Regulation of plasmid R1 replication: PcnB and RNase E expedite the decay of the antisense RNA, CopA

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is controlled by an unstable antisense RNA, CopA, which, by binding to its complementary target, blocks translation of the replication rate-limiting protein RepA. Since the degree of inhibition is directly correlated with the intracellular concentration of CopA, factors affecting CopA turnover can also alter plasmid copy number. We show here that PcnB (PAP I — a poly(A)polymerase of Escherichia coli  ) is such a factor. Previous studies have shown that the copy number of ColE1 is decreased in pcnB mutant strains because the stability of the RNase E processed form of RNAI, the antisense RNA regulator of ColE1 replication, is increased. We find that, analogously, the twofold reduction in R1 copy number caused by a pcnB lesion is associated with a corresponding increase in the stability of the RNase E-generated 3' cleavage product of CopA. These results suggest that CopA decay is initiated by RNase E cleavage and that PcnB is involved in the subsequent rapid decay of the 3' CopA stem-loop segment. We also find that, as predicted, under conditions in which CopA synthesis is unaffected, pcnB mutation reduces RepA translation and increases CopA stability to the same extent.     

Bulged-out nucleotides in an antisense RNA are required for rapid target RNA binding in vitro and inhibition in vivo.

Naturally occurring antisense RNAs in prokaryotes are generally short, highly structured and untranslated. Stem-loops are always present, and loop regions serve as primary recognition structures in most cases. Single-stranded tails or internal unstructured regions are required for initiation of stable pairing between antisense and target RNA. Most antisense RNAs contain bulged-out nucleotides or small internal loops in upper stem regions. Here we investigated the role of the bulged-out nucleotides of CopA (the copy number regulator of plasmid R1) in determining the binding properties of this antisense RNA to its target in vitro and the efficiency of a translational inhibition in vivo. The introduction of perfect helicity in the region of the two bulges in CopA decreased pairing rate constants by up to 180-fold, increased equilibrium dissociation constants of the 'kissing intermediate' up to 14-fold, and severely impaired inhibition of repA expression. A previously described loop size mutant of CopA showed decreased pairing rates, but, in contrast to the bulge-less mutant CopAs, shows a decreased dissociation constant of the 'kissing complex'. We conclude that removal of the specific bulges/internal loops within the stem-loop II of CopA impairs the inhibitor, and that creation of an internal loop at a different position does not restore activity, emphasizing the optimal folding of wild-type CopA. The accompanying paper shows that an additional function of bulges can be protection from RNase III cleavage.     

Bulged-out nucleotides protect an antisense RNA from RNase III cleavage.

Bulged-out nucleotides or internal loops are present in the stem-loop structures of several antisense RNAs. We have used the antisense/target RNA system (CopA/CopT) that controls the copy number of plasmid R1 to examine the possible biological function of bulged-out nucleotides. Two regions within the major stem-loop of the antisense RNA, CopA, carry bulged-out nucleotides. Base pairing in either one or both of these regions of the stem was restored by site-specific mutagenesis and in one case a new internal loop was introduced. The set of mutant and wild-type CopA variants was characterized structurally in vitro. The results reported here indicate a possible function of the bulges: their presence protects CopA RNA from being a substrate for the double-strand-specific enzyme RNase III. In vitro cleavage rates were drastically increased when either the lower or both bulges were absent. This is paralleled by a similar, but not identical, effect of the bulges on metabolic stability of the CopA RNAs in vivo. The degradation pathways of wild-type and mutant CopA in various strain backgrounds are discussed. In the accompanying paper, we address the significance of bulges in CopA for binding to the target RNA in vitro and for its inhibitory efficiency in vivo.     

Translational control by antisense RNA in control of plasmid replication

Control of replication of plasmids involves two processes: measurement of the copy number of the plasmid and adjustment of the replication frequency accordingly. For both these processes IncFII plasmids use an antisense RNA (CopA RNA) that forms a duplex with the upstream region (CopT) of the mRNA of the rate-limiting RepA protein. The kinetics of duplex formation was measured in vitro for the wild type and for a cop mutant plasmid; the mutant showed a reduction in the second-order rate constant for the formation of the RNA duplex and a similar increase in copy number. Hence, the kinetics of duplex formation and the concentration of CopA RNA determines the copy number of the plasmid.     

An antisense/target RNA duplex or a strong intramolecular RNA structure 5' of a translation initiation signal blocks ribosome binding: the case of plasmid R1.

Antisense RNAs in prokaryotic systems often inhibit translation of mRNAs. In some cases, this involves sequestration of Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences and start codons. In other cases, antisense/target RNA duplexes do not overlap these signals, but form upstream. We have performed toeprinting analyses on repA mRNA of plasmid R1, both free and in duplex with the antisense RNA, CopA. An intermolecular RNA duplex 2 nt upstream of the tap SD prevents ribosome binding. An intrastrand stem-loop at this location yields the same inhibition. Thus, stable secondary structures immediately upstream of the tap SD sequence inhibit translation, as shown by toeprinting in vitro and repA-lacZ expression in vivo. Previous work showed that repA (initiator protein) expression requires tap (leader peptide) translation. Toeprinting data confirm that the tap ribosome binding site (RBS) is accessible, whereas the repA RBS, which is sequestered by a stable stem-loop, is weakly recognized by the ribosome. Truncated CopA RNA (CopI) is unable to pair completely with target RNA, but proceeds normally to a kissing intermediate. This mutant RNA species inhibits repA expression in vivo. By a kinetic toeprint inhibition protocol, we have shown that the structure of the kissing complex is sufficient to sterically prevent ribosome binding. These results are discussed in comparison with the effect of RNA structures elsewhere in the ribosome-binding region of an mRNA.     

PcnB is required for the rapid degradation of RNAI, the antisense RNA that controls the copy number of CoIE1-related plasmids

The replication of CoIE1-related plasmids is controlled by an unstable antisense RNA, RNAI, which can interfere with the successful processing of the RNAII primer of replication. We show here that a host protein, PcnB, supports replication by promoting the decay of RNAI. In bacterial strains deleted for pcnB a stable, active form of RNAI, RNAI*, which appears to be identical to the product of 5′-end processing by RNAse E, accumulates. This leads to a reduction in plasmid copy number. We show, using a GST- PcnB fusion protein, that PcnB does not interfere with RNAI/RNAII binding in vitro. The fusion protein, like PcnB, has polyadenylating activity and is able to polyadenylate RNAI (and also another antisense RNA, CopA) in vitro.     

Bulged residues promote the progression of a loop-loop interaction to a stable and inhibitory antisense-target RNA complex

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA–CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop–loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop–loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop–loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.     

Real time kinetic studies of the interaction between folded antisense and target RNAs using surface plasmon resonance

Antisense RNAs interact with their complementary target RNAs as folded structures. The formation of early binding intermediates is the most important step in determining the overall rates of stable complex formation in vitro and the efficiency of control in vivo. In the case of CopA and CopT (antisense/target RNA pair of plasmid R1), recent studies have identified a four-way junction structure as the major binding intermediate. Previously, the kinetics of antisense/target RNA interaction was studied by indirect methods. Here we have used surface plasmon resonance to follow the binding of CopI (a truncated variant of CopA) to CopT in real time. A protocol was developed that permitted the determination of association and dissociation rate constants for wild-type and mutant CopI-CopT pairs. The K(D)-values calculated from these rate constants were in good agreement with the results obtained by indirect methods. In comparison to earlier model studies of interactions between simple complementary nucleic acids, we observe a different temperature dependence for dissociation rate constants. This may be indicative of the complexity of the steps required for interacting folded RNAs; intramolecular structure competes with intermolecular helix progression during complex formation. The association rate constants were not significantly dependent on temperature. The analysis presented shows that the stability of a kissing complex is not the primary determinant of the rate of stable CopA/CopT complex formation.     

The effects of RNA degradation enzymes on antisense RNAI controlling ColE2 plasmid copy number

Replication of the ColE2 plasmid requires a plasmid-coded initiator protein (Rep). Rep expression is controlled by antisense RNA (RNAI), which prevents the Rep mRNA translation. In this paper, we examined the effects of RNA degradation enzymes on the degradation pathways of RNAI of the ColE2 plasmid. In the DeltapcnB strain lacking the poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I) the RNAI degradation intermediate (RNAI(*)) accumulates much more than that in the wt strain. RNAI(*) is produced by the RNase E cleavage. RNase II and PNPase are involved in further degradation of RNAI(*) and PAP I is necessary for efficient degradation. The degradation process of ColE2 RNAI is similar to those of R1 CopA RNA and ColE1 RNAI, although the nucleotide sequences and fine secondary structures of these three RNAs are different. ColE2 RNAI is cleaved at multiple positions in the 5' end region by RNase E. The degradation pathway of ColE2 RNAI shown here is quite different from that of the ColE2 Rep mRNA which we have previously reported. In the DeltapcnB strain used for RNA analysis the copy number of the ColE2 plasmid decreases to about a half as compared with that in the isogenic wt strain.     

Analysis of dominant copy number mutants of the plasmid pMB1.

We characterize two dominant copy number mutants of a derivative of plasmid pMB1. One of the two mutations maps in the -35 region of the primer promoter and results in increased promoter activity. The analysis of the secondary structure in the proximity of the mutant sequence suggests a possible mechanism which could be the basis of the promoter-up phenotype. By comparing the properties of the mutant and the wild type plasmid in an in vitro system, we confirm that the primer and not its coding sequence is the target of RNA I inhibition. The second mutation affects the sequence of the primer so that it is less sensitive to inhibition by RNA I. We propose that this mutation stabilizes a secondary structure necessary for primer formation.