Functional Proteomics Identifies Acinus L as a Direct Insulin- and Amino Acid-Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Substrate

The serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) governs growth, metabolism, and aging in response to insulin and amino acids (aa), and is often activated in metabolic disorders and cancer. Much is known about the regulatory signaling network that encompasses mTOR, but surprisingly few direct mTOR substrates have been established to date. To tackle this gap in our knowledge, we took advantage of a combined quantitative phosphoproteomic and interactomic strategy. We analyzed the insulin- and aa-responsive phosphoproteome upon inhibition of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) component raptor, and investigated in parallel the interactome of endogenous mTOR. By overlaying these two datasets, we identified acinus L as a potential novel mTORC1 target. We confirmed acinus L as a direct mTORC1 substrate by co-immunoprecipitation and MS-enhanced kinase assays. Our study delineates a triple proteomics strategy of combined phosphoproteomics, interactomics, and MS-enhanced kinase assays for the de novo-identification of mTOR network components, and provides a rich source of potential novel mTOR interactors and targets for future investigation.The serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)¹ is conserved in all eukaryotes from yeast to mammals (1). mTOR is a central controller of cellular growth, whole body metabolism, and aging, and is frequently deregulated in metabolic diseases and cancer (2). Consequently, mTOR as well as its upstream and downstream cues are prime candidates for targeted drug development to alleviate the causes and symptoms of age-related diseases (3, 4). The identification of novel mTOR regulators and effectors thus remains a major goal in biomedical research. A vast body of literature describes a complex signaling network around mTOR. However, our current comparatively detailed knowledge of mTOR''s upstream cues contrasts with a rather limited set of known direct mTOR substrates.mTOR exists in two structurally and functionally distinct multiprotein complexes, termed mTORC1 and mTORC2. Both complexes contain mTOR kinase as well as the proteins mLST8 (mammalian lethal with SEC thirteen 8) (5–7), and deptor (DEP domain-containing mTOR-interacting protein) (8). mTORC1 contains the specific scaffold protein raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mTOR) (9, 10), whereas mTORC2 contains the specific binding partners rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) (5–7), mSIN1 (TORC2 subunit MAPKAP1) (11–13), and PRR5/L (proline rich protein 5/-like) (14–16). The small macrolide rapamycin acutely inhibits mTORC1, but can also have long-term effects on mTORC2 (17, 18). More recently, ATP-analogs (19) that block both mTOR complexes, such as Torin 1 (20), have been developed. As rapamycin has already been available for several decades, our knowledge of signaling events associated with mTORC1 as well as its metabolic inputs and outputs is much broader as compared with mTORC2. mTORC1 responds to growth factors (insulin), nutrients (amino acids, aa) and energy (ATP). In response, mTORC1 activates anabolic processes (protein, lipid, nucleotide synthesis) and blocks catabolic processes (autophagy) to ultimately allow cellular growth (21). The insulin signal is transduced to mTORC1 via the insulin receptor (IR), and the insulin receptor substrate (IRS), which associates with class I phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks). Subsequent phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate (PIP3) binding leads to relocalization of the AGC kinases phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) and Akt (also termed protein kinase B, PKB) to the plasma membrane, where PDK1 phosphorylates Akt at T308 (22, 23). In response, Akt phosphorylates and inhibits the heterocomplex formed by the tuberous sclerosis complex proteins 1 and 2 (TSC1-TSC2) (24, 25). TSC1-TSC2 is the inhibitory, GTPase-activating protein for the mTORC1-inducing GTPase Ras homolog enriched in brain (rheb) (26–30), which activates mTORC1 at the lysosome. mTORC1 localization depends on the presence of aa, which in a rag GTPase-dependent manner induce mTORC1 relocalization to lysosomes (31, 32). Low energy levels are sensed by the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK), which in turn phosphorylates the TSC1-TSC2 complex (33) and raptor (34), thereby inhibiting mTORC1.mTORC1 phosphorylates its well-described downstream substrate S6-kinase (S6K) at T389, the proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) at S183, and the translational repressor 4E-binding protein (4E-BP) at T37/46 (35–41). Unphosphorylated 4E-BP binds and inhibits the translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which within the eIF4F complex mediates the scanning process of the ribosome to reach the start codon. Phosphorylation by mTORC1 inhibits 4E-BP''s interaction with eIF4E, thus allowing for assembly of eIF4F, and translation initiation (42, 43). More recently, also the IR-activating growth factor receptor-bound protein 10 (Grb10) (44, 45), the autophagy-initiating Unc-51-like kinase ULK1 (46), and the trifunctional enzymatic complex CAD composed of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase (47, 48), which is required for nucleotide synthesis, have been described as direct mTORC1 substrates.mTORC2 activation is mostly described to be mediated by insulin, and this is mediated by a PI3K variant that is distinct from the PI3K upstream of mTORC1 (49, 50). Furthermore, mTORC2 responds to aa (5, 51). In response, mTORC2 phosphorylates the AGC kinases Akt at S473 (52–55), and serum and glucocorticoid kinase SGK (56) and protein kinase C alpha (PKCalpha) (7) within their hydrophobic motifs (57, 58), to control cellular motility (5–7), hepatic glycolysis, and lipogenesis (59). In addition, mTOR autophosphorylation at S2481 has been established as an mTORC2 readout in several cell lines including HeLa cells (49).Given the multiplicity of effects via which mTOR controls cellular and organismal growth and metabolism, it is surprising that only relatively few direct mTOR substrates have been established to date. Proteomic studies are widely used to identify novel interactors and substrates of protein kinases. Two studies have recently shed light on the interaction of rapamycin and ATP-analog mTOR inhibitors with TSC2 inhibition in mammalian cells (44, 45), and one study has analyzed the effects of raptor and rictor knockouts in non-stimulated cells (48).In this work, we report a functional proteomics approach to study mTORC1 substrates. We used an inducible raptor knockdown to inhibit mTORC1 in HeLa cells, and analyzed the effect in combination with insulin and aa induction by quantitative phosphoproteomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (60). In parallel, we purified endogenous mTOR complexes and studied the interactome of mTOR by SILAC-MS. Through comparative data evaluation, we identified acinus L as a potential novel aa/insulin-sensitive mTOR substrate. We further validated acinus L by co-immunoprecipitation and MS-enhanced kinase assays as a new direct mTORC1 substrate.     

Analysis of Proteins That Rapidly Change Upon Mechanistic/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Repression Identifies Parkinson Protein 7 (PARK7) as a Novel Protein Aberrantly Expressed in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)

Many biological processes involve the mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Thus, the challenge of deciphering mTORC1-mediated functions during normal and pathological states in the central nervous system is challenging. Because mTORC1 is at the core of translation, we have investigated mTORC1 function in global and regional protein expression. Activation of mTORC1 has been generally regarded to promote translation. Few but recent works have shown that suppression of mTORC1 can also promote local protein synthesis. Moreover, excessive mTORC1 activation during diseased states represses basal and activity-induced protein synthesis. To determine the role of mTORC1 activation in protein expression, we have used an unbiased, large-scale proteomic approach. We provide evidence that a brief repression of mTORC1 activity in vivo by rapamycin has little effect globally, yet leads to a significant remodeling of synaptic proteins, in particular those proteins that reside in the postsynaptic density. We have also found that curtailing the activity of mTORC1 bidirectionally alters the expression of proteins associated with epilepsy, Alzheimer''s disease, and autism spectrum disorder—neurological disorders that exhibit elevated mTORC1 activity. Through a protein–protein interaction network analysis, we have identified common proteins shared among these mTORC1-related diseases. One such protein is Parkinson protein 7, which has been implicated in Parkinson''s disease, yet not associated with epilepsy, Alzheimers disease, or autism spectrum disorder. To verify our finding, we provide evidence that the protein expression of Parkinson protein 7, including new protein synthesis, is sensitive to mTORC1 inhibition. Using a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex, a disease that displays both epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder phenotypes and has overactive mTORC1 signaling, we show that Parkinson protein 7 protein is elevated in the dendrites and colocalizes with the postsynaptic marker postsynaptic density-95. Our work offers a comprehensive view of mTORC1 and its role in regulating regional protein expression in normal and diseased states.The mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)¹ is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is highly expressed in many cell types (1). In the brain, mTORC1 tightly coordinates different synaptic plasticities — long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) — the molecular correlates of learning and memory (2–5). Because mTORC1 is at the core of many synaptic signaling pathways downstream of glutamate and neurotrophin receptors, many hypothesize that dysregulated mTORC1 signaling underlies cognitive deficits observed in several neurodegenerative diseases (3, 6–17). For example, mTORC1 and its downstream targets are hyperactive in human brains diagnosed with Alzheimer''s disease (AD) (18–20). Additionally in animal models of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), altered mTORC1 signaling contributes to the observed synaptic dysfunction and aberrant network connectivity (13, 15, 21–27). Furthermore, epilepsy, which is common in AD and ASD, has enhanced mTORC1 activity (28–32).Phosphorylation of mTORC1, considered the active form, is generally regarded to promote protein synthesis (33). Thus, many theorize that diseases with overactive mTORC1 arise from excessive protein synthesis (14). Emerging data, however, show that suppressing mTORC1 activation can trigger local translation in neurons (34, 35). Pharmacological antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, a subtype of glutamate receptors that lies upstream of mTOR activation, promotes the synthesis of the voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv1.1, in dendrites (34, 35). Consistent with these results, in models of temporal lobe epilepsy there is a reduction in the expression of voltage-gated ion channels including Kv1.1 (30, 31, 36). Interestingly in a model of focal neocortical epilepsy, overexpression of Kv1.1 blocked seizure activity (37). Because both active and inactive mTORC1 permit protein synthesis, we sought to determine the proteins whose expression is altered when mTORC1 phosphorylation is reduced in vivo.Rapamycin is an FDA-approved, immunosuppressive drug that inhibits mTORC1 activity (38). We capitalized on the ability of rapamycin to reduce mTORC1 activity in vivo and the unbiased approach of mass spectrometry to identify changes in protein expression. Herein, we provide evidence that mTORC1 activation bidirectionally regulates protein expression, especially in the PSD where roughly an equal distribution of proteins dynamically appear and disappear. Remarkably, using protein–protein interaction networks facilitated the novel discovery that PARK7, a protein thus far only implicated in Parkinson''s disease, (1) is up-regulated by increased mTORC1 activity, (2) resides in the PSD only when mTORC1 is active, and (3) is aberrantly expressed in a rodent model of TSC, an mTORC1-related disease that has symptoms of epilepsy and autism. Collectively, these data provide the first comprehensive list of proteins whose abundance or subcellular distributions are altered with acute changes in mTORC1 activity in vivo.     

mTORC1-Activated S6K1 Phosphorylates Rictor on Threonine 1135 and Regulates mTORC2 Signaling

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that forms two functionally distinct complexes important for nutrient and growth factor signaling. While mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, mTORC2 plays an important role in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Akt. Interestingly, mTORC1 negatively regulates Akt activation, but whether mTORC1 signaling directly targets mTORC2 remains unknown. Here we show that growth factors promote the phosphorylation of Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), an essential subunit of mTORC2. We found that Rictor phosphorylation requires mTORC1 activity and, more specifically, the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). We identified several phosphorylation sites in Rictor and found that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 in vitro and in vivo, in a rapamycin-sensitive manner. Phosphorylation of Rictor on Thr1135 did not affect mTORC2 assembly, kinase activity, or cellular localization. However, cells expressing a Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt. In addition, phosphorylation of the Akt substrates FoxO1/3a and glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) was found to be increased in these cells, indicating that S6K1-mediated phosphorylation of Rictor inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling. Together, our results uncover a new regulatory link between the two mTOR complexes, whereby Rictor integrates mTORC1-dependent signaling.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionarily conserved phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related Ser/Thr kinase that integrates signals from nutrients, energy sufficiency, and growth factors to regulate cell growth as well as organ and body size in a variety of organisms (reviewed in references 4, 38, 49, and 77). mTOR was discovered as the molecular target of rapamycin, an antifungal agent used clinically as an immunosuppressant and more recently as an anticancer drug (5, 20). Recent evidence indicates that deregulation of the mTOR pathway occurs in a majority of human cancers (12, 18, 25, 46), suggesting that rapamycin analogs may be potent antineoplastic therapeutic agents.mTOR forms two distinct multiprotein complexes, the rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (mTORC1 and mTORC2), respectively (6, 47). In cells, rapamycin interacts with FKBP12 and targets the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTORC1, thereby inhibiting some of its function (13, 40, 66). mTORC1 is comprised of the mTOR catalytic subunit and four associated proteins, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), mLST8 (mammalian lethal with sec13 protein 8), PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa), and Deptor (28, 43, 44, 47, 59, 73, 74). The small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain) is a key upstream activator of mTORC1 that is negatively regulated by the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 GTPase-activating protein complex (reviewed in reference 35). mTORC1 is activated by PI3K and Ras signaling through direct phosphorylation and inactivation of TSC2 by Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p90 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK) (11, 37, 48, 53, 63). mTORC1 activity is also regulated at the level of Raptor. Whereas low cellular energy levels negatively regulate mTORC1 activity through phosphorylation of Raptor by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (27), growth signaling pathways activating the Ras/ERK pathway positively regulate mTORC1 activity through direct phosphorylation of Raptor by RSK (10). More recent evidence has also shown that mTOR itself positively regulates mTORC1 activity by directly phosphorylating Raptor at proline-directed sites (20a, 75). Countertransport of amino acids (55) and amino acid signaling through the Rag GTPases were also shown to regulate mTORC1 activity (45, 65). When activated, mTORC1 phosphorylates two main regulators of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, the AGC (protein kinase A, G, and C) family kinase p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and thus stimulates protein synthesis and cellular growth (50, 60).The second mTOR complex, mTORC2, is comprised of mTOR, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1), mLST8, PRR5 (proline-rich region 5), and Deptor (21, 39, 58, 59, 66, 76, 79). Rapamycin does not directly target and inhibit mTORC2, but long-term treatment with this drug was shown to correlate with mTORC2 disassembly and cytoplasmic accumulation of Rictor (21, 39, 62, 79). Whereas mTORC1 regulates hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of S6K1, mTORC2 has been shown to phosphorylate other members of the AGC family of kinases. Biochemical and genetic evidence has demonstrated that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 (26, 39, 68, 70), thereby contributing to growth factor-mediated Akt activation (6, 7, 52). Deletion or knockdown of the mTORC2 components mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8 has a dramatic effect on mTORC2 assembly and Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (26, 39, 79). mTORC2 was also shown to regulate protein kinase Cα (PKCα) (26, 66) and, more recently, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1) (4, 22). Recent evidence implicates mTORC2 in the regulation of Akt and PKCα phosphorylation at their turn motifs (19, 36), but whether mTOR directly phosphorylates these sites remains a subject of debate (4).Activation of mTORC1 has been shown to negatively regulate Akt phosphorylation in response to insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (reviewed in references 30 and 51). This negative regulation is particularly evident in cell culture models with defects in the TSC1/TSC2 complex, where mTORC1 and S6K1 are constitutively activated. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by mTORC1 (72) and its downstream target S6K1 has been shown to decrease its stability and lead to an inability of insulin or IGF1 to activate PI3K and Akt (29, 69). Although the mechanism is unknown, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGF-Rβ) has been found to be downregulated in TSC1- and TSC2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), contributing to a reduction of PI3K signaling (80). Interestingly, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by mTORC1 has also been observed in the presence of growth factors other than IGF-1, insulin, or PDGF, suggesting that there are other mechanisms by which mTORC1 activation restricts Akt activity in cells (reviewed in references 6 and 31). Recent evidence demonstrates that rapamycin treatment causes a significant increase in Rictor electrophoretic mobility (2, 62), suggesting that phosphorylation of the mTORC2 subunit Rictor may be regulated by mTORC1 or downstream protein kinases.Herein, we demonstrate that Rictor is phosphorylated by S6K1 in response to mTORC1 activation. We demonstrate that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 and found that a Rictor mutant lacking this phosphorylation site increases Akt phosphorylation induced by growth factor stimulation. Cells expressing the Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased Akt signaling to its substrates compared to Rictor wild-type- and T1135D mutant-expressing cells. Together, our results suggest that Rictor integrates mTORC1 signaling via its phosphorylation by S6K1, resulting in the inhibition of mTORC2 and Akt signaling.     

Site-Specific mTOR Phosphorylation Promotes mTORC1-Mediated Signaling and Cell Growth

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) functions as a rapamycin-sensitive environmental sensor that promotes cellular biosynthetic processes in response to growth factors and nutrients. While diverse physiological stimuli modulate mTORC1 signaling, the direct biochemical mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation remain poorly defined. Indeed, while three mTOR phosphorylation sites have been reported, a functional role for site-specific mTOR phosphorylation has not been demonstrated. Here we identify a new site of mTOR phosphorylation (S1261) by tandem mass spectrometry and demonstrate that insulin-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in both mTORC1 and mTORC2. Here we focus on mTORC1 and show that TSC/Rheb signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in an amino acid-dependent, rapamycin-insensitive, and autophosphorylation-independent manner. Our data reveal a functional role for mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in mTORC1 action, as S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1-mediated substrate phosphorylation (e.g., p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 [S6K1] and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1) and cell growth to increased cell size. Moreover, Rheb-driven mTOR S2481 autophosphorylation and S6K1 phosphorylation require S1261 phosphorylation. These data provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function and suggest a model whereby insulin-stimulated mTOR S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1 autokinase activity, substrate phosphorylation, and cell growth.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine protein kinase, senses and integrates signals from diverse environmental cues (14, 31, 50, 74). mTOR associates with different partner proteins to form functionally distinct signaling complexes (4). The immunosuppressive drug rapamycin acutely inhibits signaling by mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) (22), which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, raptor, and PRAS40 (24, 33, 34, 54, 67). Rapamycin fails to acutely inhibit signaling by mTORC2, which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, rictor, mSin1, and PRR5/Protor (18, 32, 47, 55, 73, 76). mTORC1 promotes various biosynthetic processes, including protein synthesis, cell growth (an increase in cell mass and size), and cell proliferation (an increase in cell number) (14, 40, 74). During growth factor (e.g., insulin) and nutrient (e.g., amino acids and glucose) sufficiency, mTORC1 phosphorylates the translational regulators p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) to coordinately upregulate protein biosynthesis (40). Both S6K1 and 4EBP1 contain a TOR signaling motif, which mediates their interaction with raptor and thus facilitates their recruitment to the mTOR kinase (10, 44, 57, 58). In addition to regulating protein synthesis, mTORC1-mediated phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4EBP also promotes cell growth and cell cycle progression (15, 16). While more recently identified and thus less well characterized than mTORC1, mTORC2 mediates the phosphorylation of AGC kinase family members (e.g., Akt [also known as protein kinase B, PKB], PKCα, and SGK1) on their hydrophobic motifs and modulates the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (20, 26, 32, 55, 56).The insulin pathway represents the best-characterized activator of mTORC1 signaling to date, and thus many signaling intermediates that link insulin receptor activation to mTORC1 have been identified (12, 31). Complementary work using Drosophila melanogaster genetics and mammalian cell culture identified TSC1 (hamartin) and TSC2 (tuberin) as upstream negative regulators of mTORC1 (27). Inactivation of either the TSC1 or TSC2 genes, whose protein products heterodimerize to form a tumor suppressor complex, causes the development of benign tumors in diverse organs in both humans and rodents, a disease known as tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (36). TSC2 contains a GTPase-activating protein domain that acts on Rheb, a Ras-like GTP binding protein that activates mTORC1 (27). Thus, in TSC-deficient cells, constitutive Rheb-GTP leads to chronically high mTORC1 signaling. While the mechanism by which Rheb-GTP activates mTORC1 remains incompletely understood, Rheb coimmunoprecipitates with mTOR and directly activates mTORC1 kinase activity in vivo and in vitro when GTP bound (2, 38, 54). Rheb has been reported to augment the activity of PLD1, an enzyme that catalyzes the production of the lipid second messenger phosphatidic acid, which contributes to the mitogenic activation of mTORC1 signaling (13, 62). Additionally, Rheb-GTP was reported to induce the dissociation of the endogenous mTOR inhibitor FKBP38 (3), although aspects of this model have been questioned (72). Insulin/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling reduces the inhibitory effect of TSC on mTORC1 via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (29, 42, 64). Additionally, Ras-regulated signaling via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and RSK also inhibits TSC via PI3K/Akt-independent phosphorylation of TSC2 (39, 51, 63). In contrast, glucose deprivation enhances TSC''s inhibitory effect on mTORC1 signaling via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (on different sites) (30). Thus, TSC functions as a central nexus of diverse physiological signals to fine-tune mTORC1 signaling depending on environmental conditions (27). While the mechanism by which amino acids promote mTORC1 signaling has remained elusive, compelling new data reveal that the Rag GTPases link amino acid sensing to mTORC1 activation (35, 52, 53). During amino acid sufficiency, GTP-bound Rag heterodimers bind raptor and recruit mTORC1 to an endomembrane compartment that contains the mTORC1 activator Rheb; thus, amino acid sufficiency may function to prime mTORC1 for subsequent growth factor-mediated activation via a dynamic subcellular redistribution mechanism (52).Despite the well-characterized regulation of mTORC1 signaling by growth factors (e.g., insulin), nutrients (e.g., amino acids and glucose), and cellular stress (e.g., hypoxia) and the identification of numerous signaling mediators of these pathways, the direct molecular mechanisms by which cellular signals modulate mTORC1 action remain obscure (31). While three phosphorylation sites (P-sites) on mTOR have been reported to date (T2446, S2448, and S2481), no function has yet been ascribed to any site (7, 43, 49, 59). Here we identify S1261 as a novel mTOR phosphorylation site in vivo in cultured mammalian cells and provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function. We show that insulin signals via the PI3K/TSC/Rheb pathway in an amino acid-dependent and rapamycin-insensitive manner to promote mTOR S1261 phosphorylation, which regulates mTORC1 autokinase activity, biochemical signaling to downstream substrates, and cell growth to increased cell size, a major cellular function of mTORC1. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation will enable us to better understand how mTORC1 senses environmental stimuli to control cellular physiology. As aberrantly upregulated mTORC1 signaling likely contributes to cancer, insulin-resistant diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, understanding mTORC1 regulation may aid in the development of novel therapeutics for these prevalent human diseases (11, 21, 28).     

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Activity Is Associated with Phosphorylation of Raptor by mTOR

mTORC1 contains multiple proteins and plays a central role in cell growth and metabolism. Raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)), a constitutively binding protein of mTORC1, is essential for mTORC1 activity and critical for the regulation of mTORC1 activity in response to insulin signaling and nutrient and energy sufficiency. Herein we demonstrate that mTOR phosphorylates raptor in vitro and in vivo. The phosphorylated residues were identified by using phosphopeptide mapping and mutagenesis. The phosphorylation of raptor is stimulated by insulin and inhibited by rapamycin. Importantly, the site-directed mutation of raptor at one phosphorylation site, Ser⁸⁶³, reduced mTORC1 activity both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the Ser⁸⁶³ mutant prevented small GTP-binding protein Rheb from enhancing the phosphorylation of S6 kinase (S6K) in cells. Therefore, our findings indicate that mTOR-mediated raptor phosphorylation plays an important role on activation of mTORC1.Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)² has been shown to function as a critical controller in cellular growth, survival, metabolism, and development (1). mTOR, a highly conserved Ser-Thr phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase, structurally forms two distinct complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), each of which catalyzes the phosphorylation of different substrates (1). The best characterized substrates for mTORC1 are eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP, also known as PHAS) and p70 S6 kinase (S6K) (1), whereas mTORC2 phosphorylates the hydrophobic and turn motifs of protein kinase B (Akt/protein kinase B) (2) and protein kinase C (3, 4). mTORC1 constitutively consists of mTOR, raptor, and mLst8/GβL (1), whereas the proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) is a regulatory component of mTORC1 that disassociates after growth factor stimulation (5, 6). Raptor is essential for mTORC1 activity by providing a substrate binding function (7) but also plays a regulatory role on mTORC1 with stimuli of growth factors and nutrients (8). In response to insulin, raptor binding to substrates is elevated through the release of the competitive inhibitor PRAS40 from mTORC1 (9, 10) because PRAS40 and the substrates of mTORC1 (4E-BP and S6K) appear to bind raptor through a consensus sequence, the TOR signaling (TOS) motif (10–14). In response to amino acid sufficiency, raptor directly interacts with a heterodimer of Rag GTPases and promotes mTORC1 localization to the Rheb-containing vesicular compartment (15).mTORC1 integrates signaling pathways from growth factors, nutrients, energy, and stress, all of which generally converge on the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC1-TSC2) through the phosphorylation of TSC2 (1). Growth factors inhibit the GTPase-activating protein activity of TSC2 toward the small GTPase Rheb via the PI3K/Akt pathway (16, 17), whereas energy depletion activates TSC2 GTPase-activating protein activity by stimulating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (18). Rheb binds directly to mTOR, albeit with very low affinity (19), and upon charging with GTP, Rheb functions as an mTORC1 activator (6). mTORC1 complexes isolated from growth factor-stimulated cells show increased kinase activity yet do not contain detectable levels of associated Rheb. Therefore, how Rheb-GTP binding to mTOR leads to an increase in mTORC1 activity toward substrates, and what the role of raptor is in this activation is currently unknown. More recently, the AMPK and p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) have been reported to directly phosphorylate raptor and regulate mTORC1 activity. The phosphorylation of raptor directly by AMPK reduced mTORC1 activity, suggesting an alternative regulation mechanism independent of TSC2 in response to energy supply (20). RSK-mediated raptor phosphorylation enhances mTORC1 activity and provides a mechanism whereby stress may activate mTORC1 independent of the PI3K/Akt pathway (21). Therefore, the phosphorylation status of raptor can be critical for the regulation of mTORC1 activity.In this study, we investigated phosphorylation sites in raptor catalyzed by mTOR. Using two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping, we found that Ser⁸⁶³ and Ser⁸⁵⁹ in raptor were phosphorylated by mTOR both in vivo and in vitro. mTORC1 activity in vitro and in vivo is associated with the phosphorylation of Ser⁸⁶³ in raptor.     

A Non-canonical MEK/ERK Signaling Pathway Regulates Autophagy via Regulating Beclin 1

Autophagy-essential proteins are the molecular basis of protective or destructive autophagy machinery. However, little is known about the signaling mechanisms governing these proteins and the opposing consequences of autophagy in mammals. Here we report that a non-canonical MEK/ERK module, which is positioned downstream of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and upstream of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), regulates autophagy by regulating Beclin 1. Depletion of ERK partially inhibited autophagy, whereas specific inhibition on MEK completely inhibited autophagy. MEK could bypass ERK to promote autophagy. Basal MEK/ERK activity conferred basal Beclin 1 by preventing disassembly of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. Activation of MEK/ERK by AMPK upon autophagy stimuli disassembled mTORC1 via binding to and activating TSC but disassembled mTORC2 independently of TSC. Inhibition of mTORC1 or mTORC2 by transiently or moderately activated MEK/ERK caused moderately enhanced Beclin 1 resulting in cytoprotective autophagy, whereas inhibition of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 by sustained MEK/ERK activation caused strongly pronounced Beclin 1 leading to cytodestructive autophagy. Our findings thus propose that the AMPK-MEK/ERK-TSC-mTOR pathway regulation of Beclin 1 represents different thresholds responsible for a protective or destructive autophagy.Autophagy is an evolutionally conserved machinery involving the degradation and turnover of cytoplasmic material in lysosomes. Autophagy plays a role in cellular homeostasis (1), antiaging (2–4), development (1, 5), protection of the genome (6), and regulation of cell size (7). Autophagy may act as a means of defense against bacterium and virus invasion and be linked to various diseases including cancer (8–10), cardiomyopathy (11), and neurodegenerative disorders (12).Autophagy starts with the formation of an autophagosome, enclosed within a double membrane that engulfs part of the cytoplasm. During periods of autophagy stimuli, cells respond to either maintain the metabolism essential for survival or execute cell death. Autophagy-essential proteins (Atg)² are the molecular basis of autophagy machinery. About 30 Atg proteins in yeast and 10 in mammals have been identified. In yeast, the protein kinase target of rapamycin (TOR) mediates autophagy via Atg1-Atg13 kinase complex. Atg1 interacts with multiple components of the autophagic machinery through direct association, phosphorylation, and/or intracellular localization (13, 14).In mammalian systems, autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes to generate autophagolysosomes, which undergo a maturation process by fusing with endocytic compartments and lysosomes (15). Because it is not known how the Atg1 homolog acts in mammals, a different mechanism may be involved in regulating autophagy. Beclin 1/Atg6, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3)/Atg8, Atg5, Atg12, and Atg13 are essential for autophagosome formation in mammalian species (5, 16–20). Atg7 and Atg3 are required in the conjugation reaction between Atg12 and Atg5 and in the lipidation of LC3. During the formation of autophagosomes in mammalian cells, LC3 is lipidated via a ubiquitylation-like system (17, 21), generating a soluble form, LC3-I. LC3-I is further modified to a membrane-bound form, LC3-II, which is subsequently localized to autophagosomes and autolysosomes until being degraded by the lysosome.Beclin 1 was initially isolated as a B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl2)-interacting tumor suppressor in mammalian cells (22). Overexpression of Bcl2 attenuates the formation of the kinase complex Beclin 1-class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3KC3) essential for the formation of autophagosomes (23). The UV radiation resistance-associated gene tumor suppressor and the activating molecule in Beclin 1-regulated autophagy protein 1 (Ambra 1) were identified as new Beclin 1-binding partners that also regulate autophagy by regulating the Beclin 1-PI3KC3 kinase complex. Association of Beclin 1 with PI3KC3 is negatively regulated by Bcl2 (22) and positively regulated by UV radiation resistance-associated gene tumor suppressor and Ambra 1 (24, 25). Beclin 1 is homoallelically deleted in many human tumors. A decreased Beclin 1 level causes defective autophagy and breast cancer, but restoration of Beclin 1 induces autophagy and inhibits tumorigenicity of human breast cancer cells (18). These reports evidence the dependence on Beclin 1 for a functional autophagy mechanism.Diverse signaling pathways have been reported in the regulation of autophagy in mammalian cells (26, 27). In contrast to yeast, mammalian cells regulate autophagy via both class I and class III PI3K. Class I PI3K plays an inhibitory role, whereas class III PI3K kinase complex, which includes Beclin 1, plays a stimulatory role in autophagy by promoting the nucleation of autophagic vesicles (28, 29). A recent study also indicates that hVps15 is required in regulation of class III PI3K in mammalian cells (30). However, the signaling mechanisms controlling autophagy-essential proteins, in particular Beclin 1, and the opposing consequences of autophagy remain to be resolved.Our present studies identified and positioned a non-canonical MEK/ERK pathway downstream of AMPK and upstream of TSC and mTOR. This MEK/ERK module regulated autophagy via regulating the Beclin 1 level through the AMPK-MEK/ERK-TSC-mTOR pathway. Moderately enhanced Beclin 1 by transient or moderate activation of MEK/ERK and subsequent inhibition on mTORC1 and mTORC2 individually caused protective autophagy. Strongly pronounced Beclin 1 by sustained or strong activation of MEK/ERK followed by dual inhibition on mTORC1 and mTORC2 caused destructive autophagy. Our results thus reveal interesting Beclin 1 thresholds in regulating autophagy.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 Complex Assembly by Phosphatidic Acid: Competition with Rapamycin

mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin, is a critical node for control of cell growth and survival and has widely been implicated in cancer survival signals. mTOR exists in two complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2. Phospholipase D (PLD) and its metabolite phosphatidic acid (PA) have been implicated in the regulation of mTOR; however, their role has been controversial. We report here that suppression of PLD prevents phosphorylation of the mTORC1 substrate S6 kinase (S6K) at Thr389 and the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473. Suppression of PLD also blocked insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 and the mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of PRAS40. Importantly, PA was required for the association of mTOR with Raptor to form mTORC1 and that of mTOR with Rictor to form mTORC2. The effect of PA was competitive with rapamycin—with much higher concentrations of rapamycin needed to compete with the PA-mTORC2 interaction than with PA-mTORC1. Suppressing PA production substantially increased the sensitivity of mTORC2 to rapamycin. Data provided here demonstrate a PA requirement for the stabilization of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes and reveal a mechanism for the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on mTOR. This study also suggests that by suppressing PLD activity, mTORC2 could be targeted therapeutically with rapamycin.It has become apparent during the past decade that a critical aspect of tumor progression is the suppression of default apoptotic programs that constitute what is likely the most important protection against cancer. Cellular signals that suppress apoptosis have come to be known as “survival signals.” A common node for survival signals is mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin (5, 13, 14, 25). mTOR exists in two distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (21), that differ in their subunit composition and sensitivity to rapamycin. mTORC1 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), whereas mTORC2 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) (13, 14). There are also mTORC2 complexes that can be distinguished by association with different isoforms of mSin1 (9). While much is known about the regulation of mTORC1 (21), very little is known about the regulation of mTORC2.mTORC1 is highly sensitive to rapamycin, whereas mTORC2 is relatively insensitive to rapamycin (21). However, it was recently reported that long-term exposure to rapamycin prevented the formation of mTORC2 complexes and blocked the phosphorylation of the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473 (24, 38). Rapamycin, in association with FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12), has been reported to interact with mTOR in a manner that is competitive with phosphatidic acid (PA), the metabolic product of phospholipase D (PLD) (2, 4). PLD, like mTOR, has been implicated in survival signals in several human cancer cell lines (1, 10, 11, 27, 32, 39). Since rapamycin-FKBP12 competes with PA for binding to mTOR, the sensitivity of mTORC2 complex formation to rapamycin suggests that PA facilitates the assembly of mTORC2—and ultimately the activation of mTORC2. We report here that the assembly of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes is dependent upon PLD and its metabolite PA. The study also provides mechanistic insight into how rapamycin impacts on mTOR-mediated signals and how PLD regulates mTOR by facilitating the formation of mTOR complexes.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Dynamics of Ribosomal Protein S1 on a Bacterial Ribosome with Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry

Ribosomal protein S1 has been shown to be a significant effector of prokaryotic translation. The protein is in fact capable of efficiently initiating translation, regardless of the presence of a Shine-Dalgarno sequence in mRNA. Structural insights into this process have remained elusive, as S1 is recalcitrant to traditional techniques of structural analysis, such as x-ray crystallography. Through the application of protein cross-linking and high resolution mass spectrometry, we have detailed the ribosomal binding site of S1 and have observed evidence of its dynamics. Our results support a previous hypothesis that S1 acts as the mRNA catching arm of the prokaryotic ribosome. We also demonstrate that in solution the major domains of the 30S subunit are remarkably flexible, capable of moving 30–50Å with respect to one another.Initiation of translation is often the rate-limiting step of protein biosynthesis (1). In prokaryotes, this process is widely recognized to be directed by the Shine-Dalgarno (S.D.)¹ sequence of mRNA and its complementation with the 3′ end of 16S rRNA (2). However, binding of the S.D. sequence to the ribosome is not obligatory for initiation. Ribosomal protein S1, widely conserved in prokaryotes, (3) has been shown to efficiently initiate translation, regardless of the presence of an S.D. sequence (4, 5).S1 is a strikingly atyptical ribosomal protein, being both the largest (61 kDa) and the most acidic (pI 4.7) (6). The protein is composed of six homologous repeats each forming beta barrel domains (3) that in solution comprise a highly elongated structure spanning up to ca. 230 Å (7). This length is comparable to the diameter of the ribosome itself. In addition to these anomalous characteristics, S1 is also one of only two ribosomal proteins that has been attributed functional significance (6). Ribosomal protein S1, for instance, has no apparent role in the assembly of the ribosome, (2) yet is critical for translation in E. coli (8, 9). The functional significance of S1 is related to its most pronounced characteristic, the ability to simultaneously bind mRNA and the ribosome. Analysis of fragments produced by limited proteolysis and chemical cleavage of S1 has shown that an N-terminal fragment of S1 (residues 1–193) binds the ribosome (10) but not RNA (11). Likewise, a C-terminal fragment (res 172–557) binds RNA (12, 13) but not the ribosome (6, 10). By nature of this bi-functional structure, S1 enhances the E. coli ribosome''s affinity for RNA ∼5000 fold (14) and can directly mediate initiation of translation by binding the 5′ UTR of mRNA (4, 5). These observations have led to the hypothesis that S1 acts as a catching arm for the prokaryotic ribosome, working to bring mRNA to the proximity of the ribosome and thereby facilitate initiation (6).Unfortunately, structural analyses capturing how S1 is able to function in this manner remain elusive. A high-resolution crystal structure of ribosome bound S1, or even free S1, does not exist, because S1 is recalcitrant to crystallography (6). Preparation of ribosomes for x-ray crystallography actually involves the deliberate removal of ribosomal protein S1 as a means to improve the reproducibility of crystallization and the quality of the ribosome crystals formed (15–17). The structure and interactions of the protein have nevertheless intrigued structural biologists for decades. However, studies completed to date have failed to convincingly demonstrate the interaction between S1 and the rest of the 30S subunit, because they were incapable of localizing the individual S1 domains (16, 18–20).We have studied the binding of S1 to the 30S subunit by combining cross-linking with mass spectrometry. Chemical cross-linking has long been appreciated as a technique to probe protein-protein interactions (21, 22). With the advent of modern mass spectrometers, it can be very effectively employed to confidently identify the exact residues involved in linkages (23–28). In most cross-linking analyses, protein residues are targeted for covalent modification with a molecule that contains two reactive groups separated by a spacer arm of known length. Only protein residues closer than the length of the spacer arm are capable of being linked. Identification of cross-linked residues thereby provides distance constraints for structural modeling. In this work, the novel amidinating protein cross-linker, DEST (diethyl suberthioimidate), was employed (29, 30). This amine reactive reagent, unlike commercially available reagents, preserves the native basicity of the residues it modifies while being effective at physiological pH. Use of the reagent is unlikely to perturb protein structure and the modifications it imparts are compatible with ionization for mass spectrometry. We have additionally shown that the cross-links it forms can be efficiently enriched from other components of proteolytic digests using strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography, (30) and that DEST cross-linking of ribosomes yields structural information in excellent agreement with x-ray crystallography (29). Although DEST is an 11Å spacer arm cross-linker, it links alpha carbons up to 24Å apart because of the length and flexibility of lysine side chains. Nevertheless, this is sufficient resolution to approximate the binding positions of the 10kDa domains of S1. Furthermore, multiple cross-linking of a single domain significantly enhances the resolution with which it can be localized.Here, through the application of protein cross-linking and high resolution mass spectrometry, we show that S1 binds to the 30S subunit near the anti-S.D. motif of the 16S rRNA, demonstrate that it is highly elongated even when bound to the ribosome, and provide evidence that its C-terminal mRNA binding region is remarkably dynamic. Our results thus indicate S1 is structurally poised, as previously hypothesized, (6) to act as the mRNA catching arm of the prokaryotic ribosome.     

Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

Characterization of the ATP-dependent Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Transporter in Rat Erythrocytes

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid signal transmitter present in blood. Blood plasma S1P is supplied from erythrocytes and plays an important role in lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. However, the S1P export mechanism from erythrocytes to blood plasma is not well defined. To elucidate the mechanism of S1P export from erythrocytes, we performed the enzymatic characterization of S1P transporter in rat erythrocytes. Rat erythrocytes constitutively released S1P without any stimulus. The S1P release was reduced by an ABCA1 transporter inhibitor, glyburide, but not by a multidrug resistance-associated protein inhibitor, MK571, or a multidrug resistance protein inhibitor, cyclosporine A. Furthermore, we measured S1P transport activity using rat erythrocyte inside-out membrane vesicles (IOVs). Although the effective S1P transport into IOVs was observed in the presence of ATP, this activity was also supported by dATP and adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate. The rate of S1P transport increased depending on S1P concentration, with an apparent K_m value of 21 μm. Two phosphorylated sphingolipids, dihydrosphingosine 1-phosphate and ceramide 1-phosphate, did not inhibit S1P transport. Similar to the intact erythrocytes, the uptake of S1P into IOVs was inhibited by glyburide and vanadate but not by the other ABC transporter inhibitors. These results suggest that S1P is exported from the erythrocytes by a novel ATP-dependent transporter.Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P),² a bioactive lipid molecule present in the blood, plays an important role in diverse cellular responses, such as migration, proliferation, and differentiation (1, 2). These processes are triggered by the binding of S1P to its specific receptors (3), of which five subtypes (S1P₁-S1P₅) have been identified in endothelial and immune cells (4). Studies using S1P₁ receptor-deficient mice showed abnormalities in lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes, spleen, and thymus (5, 6). Whereas blood plasma contains a basal level of S1P from the nanomolar to the micromolar range (7–12), lymphoid tissues maintain a low S1P environment through the activity of S1P lyase (13). It has been proposed that a higher concentration of S1P in the blood plasma than in the lymphoid organs establishes an essential gradient along which lymphocytes expressing the S1P₁ receptor on cell surfaces migrate (2, 5, 6, 13–15).The source of plasma S1P remains unclear despite its importance in the cellular responses of endothelial cells and lymphocytes. Unlike most cells, blood cells, astrocytes, and vascular endothelial cells are reported to release S1P (8, 16–18). These cells contain sphingosine kinase, which synthesizes S1P through the phosphorylation of sphingosine (16, 18, 19). Whereas platelets and mast cells release S1P in a stimulus-dependent manner (17, 20), erythrocytes, neutrophils, and mononuclear cells release S1P in a stimulus-independent manner (16). The roles of S1P derived from erythrocytes, the most abundant of these blood cells, have not been elucidated. However, recent reports suggest that S1P released from erythrocytes is a major source of plasma S1P (7, 9) and promotes lymphocyte egress to blood (9).Previously, we showed that S1P is released from rat platelets upon stimulation by thrombin or Ca²⁺ (21). We proposed that an ATP-dependent transporter plays a key role in S1P release from platelets (21). However, the detailed mechanism of S1P release is unclear because there is no way to assay the transport of S1P across the membrane. In this study we compared the properties of S1P release from erythrocytes with that of platelets and showed that S1P release from erythrocytes does not require any stimuli. We then established an assay to measure the ATP-dependent S1P uptake into inside-out membrane vesicles (IOVs) prepared from rat erythrocytes and characterized S1P transport in erythrocytes.     

Specification of Neuronal Polarity Regulated by Local Translation of CRMP2 and Tau via the mTOR-p70S6K Pathway

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an important regulator of neuronal development and functions. Although it was reported recently that mTOR signaling is critical for neuronal polarity, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we describe the molecular pathway of mTOR-dependent axon specification, in which the collapsing response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) and Tau are major downstream targets. The activity of mTOR effector 70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K) specifically increases in the axon during neuronal polarity formation. The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin suppresses the translation of some neuronal polarity proteins, including CRMP2 and Tau, thereby inhibiting axon formation. In contrast, constitutively active p70S6K up-regulates the translation of these molecules, thus inducing multiple axons. Exogenous CRMP2 and Tau facilitate axon formation, even in the presence of rapamycin. In the 5′-untranslated region of Tau and CRMP2 mRNAs, we identified a 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine tract, which mediates mTOR-governed protein synthesis. The 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine tract sequences of CRMP2 and Tau mRNAs strongly contribute to the up-regulation of their translation in the axon in response to the axonal activation of the mTOR-p70S6K pathway. Taken together, we conclude that the local translation of CRMP2 and Tau, regulated by mTOR-p70S6K, is critical for the specification of neuronal polarity.To function, developing neurons must establish axonal-dendritic polarity. The polarization processes have been well studied in cultured hippocampal neurons (1, 2). They first form lamellipodia and small protrusion veils shortly after plating (stage 1) and then extend several immature neurites within 12–24 h (stage 2). One of the neurites rapidly elongates and becomes the axon, whereas the others become dendrites (stage 3). During these processes, a number of molecules coordinately control the axon specification (3). These molecules spatially regulate cytoskeletal networks of actin filaments and microtubules for specification and maintenance of a single axon.Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)² is a serine/threonine protein kinase and mainly controls protein synthesis via phosphorylation of its downstream targets, such as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E)-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) and 70-kDa ribosomal S6 protein kinase (p70S6K) (4). In the nervous system, mTOR plays important roles in neuronal survival, dendritic arbor formation, synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory (5). Notably, in the regulation of synaptic plasticity, a number of mRNAs are locally translated via activation of the mTOR pathway in response to extracellular signals (5–7). Recently, two research groups reported that the mTOR pathway is also critical for the formation of neuronal polarity (8, 9). They proposed that the mTOR pathway controls the synthesis of polarity proteins, such as synapses of the amphid-detective (SAD) kinases (8) and Rap1 (9), and therefore regulates the neuronal polarity. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that p70S6K is necessary and sufficient for the mTOR-controlled axon formation as a downstream effector of mTOR. The mTOR-p70S6K pathway regulates translation of several neuronal polarity genes, including SAD kinases and Rap1. In particular, the expressions of collapsing response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) and microtubule-associated protein Tau are highly dependent on mTOR-governed protein synthesis. We further identified a 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine (5′-TOP) tract, which mediates mTOR-governed protein synthesis (10), in the 5′-UTRs of CRMP2 and Tau mRNAs. In the axon of developing neurons, the translation of CRMP2 and Tau mRNAs is spatially controlled by the mTOR-p70S6K pathway via the 5′-TOP sequences, resulting in accumulation of CRMP2 and Tau proteins in the axon. Thus, our study substantially improves understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the mTOR-dependent development of neuronal polarity.