CD38/cADPR/Ca2+ Pathway Promotes Cell Proliferation and Delays Nerve Growth Factor-induced Differentiation in PC12 Cells

Intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization plays an important role in a wide variety of cellular processes, and multiple second messengers are responsible for mediating intracellular Ca²⁺ changes. Here we explored the role of one endogenous Ca²⁺-mobilizing nucleotide, cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (cADPR), in the proliferation and differentiation of neurosecretory PC12 cells. We found that cADPR induced Ca²⁺ release in PC12 cells and that CD38 is the main ADP-ribosyl cyclase responsible for the acetylcholine (ACh)-induced cADPR production in PC12 cells. In addition, the CD38/cADPR signaling pathway is shown to be required for the ACh-induced Ca²⁺ increase and cell proliferation. Inhibition of the pathway, on the other hand, accelerated nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells. Conversely, overexpression of CD38 increased cell proliferation but delayed NGF-induced differentiation. Our data indicate that cADPR plays a dichotomic role in regulating proliferation and neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells.Mobilization of intracellular Ca²⁺ stores is involved in diverse cell functions, including fertilization, cell proliferation, and differentiation (1–4). At least three endogenous Ca²⁺-mobilizing messengers have been identified, including inositol trisphosphate (IP₃),³ nicotinic adenine acid dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP), and cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (cADPR). Similar to IP₃, cADPR can mobilize calcium release in a wide variety of cell types and species, from protozoa to animals. The cADPR-mediated Ca²⁺ signaling has been indicated in a variety of cellular processes (5–7), from abscisic acid signaling and regulation of the circadian clock in plants, to mediating long-term synaptic depression in hippocampus.Ample evidence shows that the ryanodine receptors are the main intracellular targets for cADPR (1, 2, 8). Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are intracellular Ca²⁺ channels widely expressed in various cells and tissues, including muscles and neurons. It is the major cellular mediator of Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release (CICR) in cells. There are three isoforms of ryanodine receptors: RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3, all of which have been implicated in the cADPR signaling (1, 2, 8). However, evidence regarding cADPR acting directly on the receptors is lacking (9). It has been suggested that accessory proteins, such as calmodulin and FK506-binding protein (FKBP), may be involved instead (10–15).cADPR is formed from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) by ADP-ribosyl cyclases. Six ADP-ribosyl cyclases have been identified so far: Aplysia ADP-ribosyl cyclase, three sea urchin homologues (16, 17), and two mammalian homologues, CD38 and CD157 (18). CD38 is a membrane-bound protein and the main mammalian ADP-ribosyl cyclase. As a novel multifunctional enzyme, CD38 catalyzes the synthesis and hydrolysis of both cADPR and NAADP, two structurally and functionally distinct Ca²⁺ messengers. Virtually all mammalian tissues ever examined have been shown to express CD38. CD38 knock-out mice exhibit multiple physiological defects, ranging from impaired immune responses, metabolic disturbances, to behavioral modifications (1, 6, 18).CD38 was originally identified as a lymphocyte differentiation antigen (18). Indeed, CD38/cADPR has been linked to cell differentiation (5). For example, in human HL-60 cells, CD38 expression and the consequential accumulation of cADPR play a causal role in mediating granulocytic differentiation (19). In addition, expression of CD38 in HeLa and 3T3 cells not only increased intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration but also induced cell proliferation by significantly reducing the S phase duration, leading to shortened cell doubling time (20). The ability of cADPR to increase cell proliferation has also been observed in human T cells (21), human hemopoietic progenitors (22), human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (23), human mesenchymal stem cells (24), and murine mesangial cells (25).The PC12 cell line was derived from rat adrenal medulla and has been used extensively as a neuronal model, since it exhibits many of the functions observed in primary neuronal cultures (26). Most importantly, PC12 cells can be induced by nerve growth factor (NGF) to differentiate into cells with extensive neurite outgrowths, resembling neuronal dendritic trees (26, 27). In contrast to NGF, numerous growth factors and neurotransmitters can induce the proliferation of PC12 cells instead (26). Both IP₃ receptor- and ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca²⁺ stores have been shown to be present in PC12 cells (28–31). The type 2 ryanodine receptor is expressed in PC12 cells and activation of the NO/cGMP pathway in PC12 cells results in calcium mobilization, which is mediated by cADPR and similar to that seen in sea urchin eggs (32). It has been demonstrated that NAADP, another Ca²⁺-mobilizing messenger, is also a potent neuronal differentiation inducer in PC12 cells, while IP₃ exhibits no such role (33, 34). Whether cADPR is involved in the proliferation and differentiation of PC12 cells is unknown.Here we show that activation of the CD38/cADPR/Ca²⁺ signaling is required for the ACh-induced proliferation in PC12 cells, while inhibition of the pathway accelerates NGF-induced neuronal differentiation. Our data indicate that cADPR is important in regulating cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells.     

Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Dynamic Interaction of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) with RNA Transport Granule Proteins Splicing Factor Proline- and Glutamine-rich (Sfpq) and Non-POU Domain-containing Octamer-binding Protein (Nono) during Neuronal Differentiation

The c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is an important mediator of physiological and pathophysiological processes in the central nervous system. Importantly, JNK not only is involved in neuronal cell death, but also plays a significant role in neuronal differentiation and regeneration. For example, nerve growth factor induces JNK-dependent neuronal differentiation in several model systems. The mechanism by which JNK mediates neuronal differentiation is not well understood. Here, we employed a proteomic strategy to better characterize the function of JNK during neuronal differentiation. We used SILAC-based quantitative proteomics to identify proteins that interact with JNK in PC12 cells in a nerve growth factor–dependent manner. Intriguingly, we found that JNK interacted with neuronal transport granule proteins such as Sfpq and Nono upon NGF treatment. We validated the specificity of these interactions by showing that they were disrupted by a specific peptide inhibitor that blocks the interaction of JNK with its substrates. Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting experiments confirmed the interaction of JNK1 with Sfpq/Nono and demonstrated that it was RNA dependent. Confocal microscopy indicated that JNK1 associated with neuronal granule proteins in the cytosol of PC12 cells, primary cortical neurons, and P19 neuronal cells. Finally, siRNA experiments confirmed that Sfpq was necessary for neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells and that it most likely acted in the same pathway as JNK. In summary, our data indicate that the interaction of JNK1 with transport granule proteins in the cytosol of differentiating neurons plays an important role during neuronal development.The members of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)¹ family are important mediators of a broad range of biological processes in the brain (1, 2). JNK belongs to the family of mitogen-activated protein kinases and is encoded by three different genes: jnk1, jnk2, and jnk3. Alternative splicing combined with alternative exon usage of the three genes leads to at least 10 different JNK isoforms (3). JNK is induced by various stimuli such as cytokines, ligands of Toll-like receptors, or growth factors (4).JNK is well known to induce neuronal cell death. However, it has become clear within the past decade that JNK plays an important role in neuronal regeneration, migration, and differentiation (5–8). JNK controls dendritic microtubule assembly and disassembly in sympathetic neurons (2, 9) and is responsible for dendritic elongation during brain development in mice (10). Furthermore, several cytoskeleton-regulating proteins such as doublecortin, superior cervical ganglion-10 protein, microtubule-associated protein 1B, microtubule-associated protein 2, and MARCKS-like protein 1 have been identified as JNK substrates (11–16). Collectively, these observations have established that JNKs not only are involved in neuronal death, but also play an important role during differentiation and regeneration. Although stress-induced pro-apoptotic JNK signaling is well characterized, the mechanisms involved in JNK-dependent neuronal differentiation remain enigmatic.Quantitative mass-spectrometry-based proteomics has emerged as a powerful technology for investigating mammalian signaling pathways (17, 18). Specifically, stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) has been shown to be a powerful approach for studying dynamic changes in protein–protein interactions during cell signaling. We reasoned that an unbiased proteomic analysis of JNK interaction partners during neuronal differentiation could provide novel insights into the mechanisms involved. For that purpose, we used PC12 cells as a well-characterized classical model for neuronal differentiation (19). Stimulation of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor (NGF) induces a major shift in phenotype, from proliferating tumor cells to non-dividing neurons showing characteristics of sympathetic neurons such as the growth of long neurites and electrical excitability (19, 20). In PC12 cells, NGF binds to neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 1, low-affinity neurotrophin receptor, and fibroblast growth factor receptors (21, 22). This leads to a coordinated activation of downstream signaling cascades such as the Ras/Raf/Erk1–2, PI3K, and JNK pathways, resulting in increased expression of genes that are involved in neuronal differentiation (23, 24). Furthermore, G-proteins including Ras, Rap, and Cdc42 have been shown to link receptor activity to downstream kinase activation (25–27).Here, we used quantitative interaction proteomics to analyze dynamic changes in JNK interaction partners during NGF-induced differentiation of PC12 cells. Our results show that JNK dynamically interacts with G-proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, and RNA binding proteins with distinct kinetic patterns. Intriguingly, several of the identified RNA binding proteins are known components of transport granules involved in mRNA localization and localized translation in neurons. Western blotting and co-localization experiments using confocal microscopy and proximity ligation assays validated the NGF-induced association of JNK1 with two RNA binding proteins, Sfpq and Nono. Furthermore, Sfpq knockdown decreased NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells, supporting the hypothesis that the interaction of JNK and Sfpq may contribute to neuronal differentiation.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Complex Lipid Requirements for SNARE- and SNARE Chaperone-dependent Membrane Fusion

Membrane fusion without lysis has been reconstituted with purified yeast vacuolar SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors), the SNARE chaperones Sec17p/Sec18p and the multifunctional HOPS complex, which includes a subunit of the SNARE-interactive Sec1-Munc18 family, and vacuolar lipids: phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidic acid (PA), cardiolipin (CL), ergosterol (ERG), diacylglycerol (DAG), and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P). We now report that many of these lipids are required for rapid and efficient fusion of the reconstituted SNARE proteoliposomes in the presence of SNARE chaperones. Omission of either PE, PA, or PI3P from the complete set of lipids strongly reduces fusion, and PC, PE, PA, and PI3P constitute a minimal set of lipids for fusion. PA could neither be replaced by other lipids with small headgroups such as DAG or ERG nor by the acidic lipids PS or PI. PA is needed for full association of HOPS and Sec18p with proteoliposomes having a minimal set of lipids. Strikingly, PA and PE are as essential for SNARE complex assembly as for fusion, suggesting that these lipids facilitate functional interactions among SNAREs and SNARE chaperones.Biological membrane fusion is the regulated rearrangement of the lipids in two apposed sealed membranes to form one bilayer while mixing lumenal contents without leakage or lysis. It is fundamental for intracellular vesicular traffic, cell growth and division, regulated secretion of hormones and other blood proteins, and neurotransmission and thus has attracted wide and sustained study (1, 2). Its fundamental mechanisms are conserved and employ a Rab-family GTPase, proteins which bind to the GTP-bound form of a Rab, termed its “effectors” (3), and SNARE³ (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) proteins (4) with their attendant chaperones. SNAREs are integral or peripheral membrane proteins with characteristic heptad-repeat domains, which can associate in 4-helical coiled-coils (5), termed “cis-SNARE complexes,” if they are all anchored to the same membrane bilayer, or “trans-SNARE complexes” if they are anchored to apposed membranes.Stable membrane proximity (docking) does not suffice for fusion. Studies in model systems have shown that fusion can be promoted by any of several agents, which promote bilayer rearrangement, such as diacylglycerol (6), high levels of calcium (7), viral-encoded fusion proteins (8, 9), or SNAREs (10, 11). These studies frequently employed liposomes or proteoliposomes of simple lipid composition, suggesting that fusion may not have stringent requirements of lipid head group species. However, each of these model fusion reactions is accompanied by substantial lysis (12–15), whereas the preservation of subcellular compartments is a hallmark of physiological membrane fusion.We have studied membrane fusion with the vacuole (lysosome) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (reviewed in Ref. 16). The fusion of isolated vacuoles requires the Rab Ypt7p, 4 SNAREs (Vam3p, Vti1p, Vam7p, and Nyv1p), the SNARE chaperones Sec17p (α-soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein)/Sec18p (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor) and the hexameric HOPS complex (17), and key “regulatory” lipids including ERG, phosphoinositides, and DAG (18). HOPS interacts physically or functionally with each component of this fusion system. HOPS stably associates with Ypt7p in its GTP-bound state (19). One HOPS subunit, Vps33p, is a member of the Sec1-Munc18 family of SNARE-binding proteins, and HOPS exhibits direct affinity for SNAREs (17, 20–22) and proofreads correct vacuolar SNARE pairing (23). HOPS also has direct affinity for phosphoinositides (17). The SNAREs on isolated vacuoles are in cis-complexes, which are disassembled by Sec17p, Sec18p, and ATP (24). Docking requires Ypt7p (25) and HOPS (17). During docking, vacuoles are drawn against each other until each has a substantial membrane domain tightly apposed to the other. Each of the proteins (26) and lipids (18) required for fusion becomes enriched in a ring-shaped microdomain, the “vertex ring,” which surrounds the two tightly apposed membrane domains. Not only do the proteins depend on each other, in a cascade fashion, for vertex ring enrichment, and the lipids depend on each other for their vertex ring enrichment as well, but the lipids and proteins are mutually interdependent for their enrichment at this ring-shaped microdomain (18, 27). Fusion occurs around the ring, joining the two organelles. The fusion of vacuoles bearing physiological fusion constituents does not cause measurable organelle lysis, although fusion supported exclusively by higher levels of SNARE proteins is accompanied by massive lysis (28), in accord with model liposome studies (14). Thus fusion microdomain assembly and the coordinate action of SNAREs with other proteins and lipids to promote fusion without lysis are central topics in membrane fusion studies.Reconstitution of fusion with pure components allows chemical definition of essential elements of this biologically important reaction. Although SNAREs can drive a slow fusion of PC/PS proteoliposomes (29), this was not stimulated by HOPS and Sec17p/Sec18p (30). SNARE proteoliposomes bearing all the vacuolar lipids (18, 31–33), PC, PE, PI, PS, CL, PA, ERG, DAG, PI3P, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂), showed rapid and efficient fusion that was fully dependent on Sec17p/Sec18p and HOPS (30). The omission of either DAG, ERG, or phosphoinositide from the liposomes caused a marked reduction in fusion (30). We now report that PE and PA are also necessary for rapid and efficient fusion, function in distinct manners, and are required for efficient assembly of newly formed SNARE complexes by the SNARE chaperones Sec17p/Sec18p and HOPS.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.