Diverging pathways for lipopolysaccharide and CD14 in human monocytes

BACKGROUND: CD14 is considered to be the major endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) binding molecule on human monocytes. It initiates cellular response, but its role in the clearance of LPS is not well understood. Under conditions that ensure totally CD14-dependent LPS binding on human monocytes, the internalization mechanisms of LPS and CD14 were studied. METHODS: The uptake and intracellular distribution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-LPS and CD14 was determined by flow cytometry, trypan blue quenching, and confocal fluorescence microscopy. Incubation of surface-biotinylated cells with LPS at 37 degrees C or 4 degrees C and subsequent subfractionation was used to further characterize CD14 internalization. The amount of the intracellular CD14 was estimated by CD14 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: The internalization rate of 10 ng/ml FITC-LPS with 1% human serum was 1% of bound endotoxin per minute, whereas CD14 expression did not decrease at the same time surface. We proved the presence of an intracellular CD14 pool (2.68 x 10(6) molecules per unstimulated monocyte) and could show that internalized FITC-LPS molecules can be found in different intracellular compartments than CD14. Subfractionation of LPS-treated biotinylated monocytes showed no change in biotinylated CD14 in the membrane fraction independently of the incubation temperature (37 degrees C or at 4 degrees C) used, indicating that these CD14 molecules were not taken up by an active process. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate the presence of a large intracellular CD14 pool in monocytes with a yet unknown function, and suggest that LPS and CD14 molecules can be internalized independently after association on the cell surface.     

Activation of human and mouse Kupffer cells by lipopolysaccharide is mediated by CD14

Upregulation of CD14 in Kupffer cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several forms of liver injury, including alcoholic liver disease. However, it remains unclear whether CD14 mediates lipopolysaccharide (LPS) signaling in this specialized liver macrophage population. In this series of experiments, we determined the role of CD14 in LPS activation of Kupffer cells by using several complementary approaches. First, we isolated Kupffer cells from human livers and studied the effects of anti-CD14 antibodies on LPS activation of these cells. Kupffer cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of LPS in the presence and absence of recombinant human LPS binding protein (LBP). With increasing concentrations of LPS, human Kupffer cell tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production (a marker for Kupffer cell activation) increased in a dose-dependent manner in the presence and absence of LBP. In the presence of anti-human CD14 antibodies, the production of TNF-alpha was significantly diminished. Second, we compared LPS activation of Kupffer cells isolated from wild-type and CD14 knockout mice. Kupffer cells from CD14 knockout mice produced significantly less TNF-alpha in response to the same amount of LPS. Together, these data strongly support a critical role for CD14 in Kupffer cell responses to LPS.     

P fimbriae-dependent, lipopolysaccharide-independent activation of epithelial cytokine responses

Cells in the mucosal barrier are equipped to sense and respond to microbes in the lumen and translate this molecular information into signals that can reach local or distant sites. The interaction of P-fimbriated Escherichia coli with human uroepithelial cells is a model to study the molecular mechanism of epithelial cell activation by mucosal pathogens. Here, we examine the role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as a co-stimulatory molecule in epithelial cell activation by P-fimbriated E. coli. P-fimbriated clinical isolates or recombinant strains were shown to trigger a fimbriae-dependent epithelial cell cytokine response. Mutational inactivation of the msbB sequences that control lipid A myristoylation drastically impaired monocyte stimulation but not epithelial responses to P-fimbriated bacteria. Polymyxin B or bactericidal/permeability increasing factor (BPI) neutralized the effects of lipid A in the monocyte assay, but did not reduce epithelial responses. Finally, isolated LPS of the smooth, rough and deep rough chemotypes were poor epithelial cell activators. The cells were shown to lack surface CD14 or CD14 mRNA as well as the CD14 co-receptor function and were also very poor LPS responders in the presence of human serum. These results demonstrate that epithelial cell responses to P-fimbriated E. coli are CD14 and LPS independent, and suggest that attaching pathogens can overcome the LPS unresponsiveness of epithelial cells by fimbriae-dependent activation mechanisms.     

Regulatory roles for CD14 and phosphatidylinositol in the signaling via toll-like receptor 4-MD-2

The complex consisting of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and associated MD-2 signals the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) when it is expressed in cell lines. We here show that normal human mononuclear cells express TLR4 and signal LPS via TLR4. CD14 is a molecule that binds to LPS and facilitates its signaling. Little is known, however, about the relationship of CD14 with TLR4-MD-2. We show that CD14 helps TLR4-MD-2 to sense and signal the presence of LPS. CD14 has also been implicated in recognition of apoptotic cells, which leads to phagocytosis without activation. Membrane phospholipids such as phosphatidylserine (PS) or phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) are thought to serve as the ligands for CD14 in apoptotic cells. We find that PtdIns acts as an LPS antagonist in the signaling via TLR4-MD-2. TLR4-MD-2 seems to discriminate LPS from phospholipids. The signaling via TLR4-MD-2 is thus regulated by CD14 and phospholipid such as PtdIns.     

MPS1: a small, evolutionarily conserved zinc finger protein from the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii

Production of tissue factor (TF) in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was examined in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) transfected with human CD14 DNA. The expression of CD14 on HUVECs dramatically enhanced the production of TF at a low concentration of LPS in the absence of fetal calf serum (FCS). On the other hand, mock-transfected HUVECs did not respond to even a high concentration of LPS. TF production in CD14-expressing HUVECs was significantly inhibited by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody. Addition of FCS to the culture of CD14-expressing HUVECs markedly augmented the LPS-induced TF production, whereas only a marginal effect was observed in mock-transfected HUVECs. The findings suggested that the integration of membrane CD14 rendered HUVECs highly sensitive to LPS in the production of TF irrespective of the presence of FCS.     

Identification of the 80-kDa LPS-binding protein (LMP80) as decay-accelerating factor (DAF, CD55)

The activation of immunocompetent cells by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) during severe Gram-negative infections is responsible for the pathophysiological reactions, possibly resulting in the clinical picture of sepsis. Monocytes recognize LPS mainly through the LPS receptor CD14, however, other cellular binding structures have been assumed to exist. In previous studies, we have described an 80-kDa LPS-binding membrane protein (LMP80), which is present on human monocytes as well as endothelial cells. Here we demonstrate that LMP80 is widely distributed and that it forms complexes together with LPS and sCD14. Furthermore, we report on the biochemical purification of LMP80 and its identification as decay-accelerating factor, CD55, by amino acid sequencing and cloning techniques. Our results imply a new feature of CD55 as a molecule which interacts with LPS/sCD14 complexes. However, the involvement of CD55 in LPS-induced signaling remains to be elucidated.     

A novel synthetic acyclic lipid A-like agonist activates cells via the lipopolysaccharide/toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathway

ER-112022 is a novel acyclic synthetic lipid A analog that contains six symmetrically organized fatty acids on a noncarbohydrate backbone. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 fibroblasts and U373 human astrocytoma cells do not respond to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the absence of CD14. In contrast, exposure to ER-112022 effectively induced activation of CHO and U373 cells under serum-free conditions. Expression of CD14 was not necessary for cells to respond to ER-112022, although the presence of soluble CD14 enhanced the sensitivity of the response. Several lines of evidence suggested that ER-112022 stimulates cells via the LPS signal transduction pathway. First, the diglucosamine-based LPS antagonists E5564 and E5531 blocked ER-112022-induced stimulation of CHO-K1, U373, and RAW264.7 cells. Second, ER-112022 was unable to activate C3H/HeJ mouse peritoneal macrophages, containing a mutation in Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, as well as HEK293 cells, an epithelial cell line that does not express TLR4. Third, ER-112022 activated NF-kappaB in HEK293 cells transfected with TLR4/MD-2. Finally, tumor necrosis factor release from primary human monocytes exposed to ER-112022 was blocked by TLR4 antibodies but not by TLR2 antibodies. Our results suggest that ER-112022 and the family of lipid A-like LPS antagonists can functionally associate with TLR4 in the absence of CD14. Synthetic molecules like ER-112022 may prove to be valuable tools to characterize elements in the LPS receptor complex, as well as to activate or inhibit the TLR4 signaling pathway for therapeutic purposes.     

MD-2 binds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide

The exact roles and abilities of the individual components of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptor complex of proteins remain unclear. MD-2 is a molecule found in association with toll-like receptor 4. We produced recombinant human MD-2 to explore its LPS binding ability and role in the LPS receptor complex. MD-2 binds to highly purified rough LPS derived from Salmonella minnesota and Escherichia coli in five different assays; one assay yielded an apparent KD of 65 nm. MD-2 binding to LPS did not require LPS-binding proteins LBP and CD14; in fact LBP competed with MD-2 for LPS. MD-2 enhanced the biological activity of LPS in toll-like receptor 4-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells but inhibited LPS activation of U373 astrocytoma cells and of monocytes in human whole blood. These data indicate that MD-2 is a genuine LPS-binding protein and strongly suggest that MD-2 could play a role in regulation of cellular activation by LPS depending on its local availability.     

Residual Endotoxin Contaminations in Recombinant Proteins Are Sufficient to Activate Human CD1c+ Dendritic Cells

Many commercially available recombinant proteins are produced in Escherichia coli, and most suppliers guarantee contamination levels of less than 1 endotoxin unit (EU). When we analysed commercially available proteins for their endotoxin content, we found contamination levels in the same range as generally stated in the data sheets, but also some that were higher. To analyse whether these low levels of contamination have an effect on immune cells, we stimulated the monocytic cell line THP-1, primary human monocytes, in vitro differentiated human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and primary human CD1c⁺ dendritic cells (DCs) with very low concentrations of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; ranging from 0.002–2 ng/ml). We show that CD1c⁺ DCs especially can be activated by minimal amounts of LPS, equivalent to the levels of endotoxin contamination we detected in some commercially available proteins. Notably, the enhanced endotoxin sensitivity of CD1c⁺ DCs was closely correlated with high CD14 expression levels observed in CD1c⁺ DCs that had been maintained in cell culture medium for 24 hours. When working with cells that are particularly sensitive to LPS, even low endotoxin contamination may generate erroneous data. We therefore recommend that recombinant proteins be thoroughly screened for endotoxin contamination using the limulus amebocyte lysate test, fluorescence-based assays, or a luciferase based NF-κB reporter assay involving highly LPS-sensitive cells overexpressing TLR4, MD-2 and CD14.     

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus activates immune cells via Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), and CD14, whereas TLR-4 and MD-2 are not involved

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) derived from Streptococcus pneumoniae, purified employing a chloroform/methanol protocol, and from Staphylococcus aureus, prepared by the recently described butanol extraction procedure, was investigated regarding its interaction with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP), CD14, Toll-like receptors (TLRs)-2 and -4, and MD-2. LTA from both organisms induced cytokine synthesis in human mononuclear phagocytes. Activation was LBP- and CD14-dependent, and formation of complexes of LTA with LBP and soluble CD14 as well as catalytic transfer of LTA to CD14 by LBP was verified by PhastGel(TM) native gel electrophoresis. Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293/CD14 cells and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were responsive to LTA only after transfection with TLR-2. Additional transfection with MD-2 did not affect stimulation of these cells by LTA. Our data suggest that innate immune recognition of LTA via LBP, CD14, and TLR-2 represents an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of systemic complications in the course of infectious diseases brought about by the clinically most important Gram-positive pathogens. However, the involvement of TLR-4 and MD-2 in this process was ruled out.     

The lipopolysaccharide-recognition mechanism in cells expressing TLR4 and CD14 but lacking MD-2

We analysed the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-recognition mechanism in cells expressing TLR4 and CD14 but lacking MD-2. When TLR4 and CD14 were transiently expressed in HEK293 cells, cell-surface expression of TLR4 was observed, although the expression level was lower than that in cells coexpressing MD-2. We found that membrane CD14-TLR4 complexes were formed in these cells in response to LPS stimulation even in the absence of MD-2 expression, although NF-kappaB-dependent reporter activity was not induced. A strong activation of NF-kappaB was observed when these cells were stimulated with LPS followed by soluble MD-2 in this order, even when excess LPS was removed after formation of the CD14-TLR4 complex by washing cells prior to sMD-2 addition. From these results, we propose an additional LPS-recognition mechanism. In cells expressing TLR4 and CD14 but lacking MD-2, LPS is first transferred to membrane CD14 with the aid of LPS binding protein, which leads to the formation of the TLR4-CD14 complex. Then, the binding of soluble MD-2 to this complex triggers the transmembrane signal transduction. Cells expressing TLR4 and CD14 but lacking MD-2, such as airway epithelial cells, may be activated in response to LPS by this mechanism.     

Type 1 fimbriae deliver an LPS- and TLR4-dependent activation signal to CD14-negative cells

Fimbriae target bacteria to different mucosal surfaces and enhance the inflammatory response at these sites. Inflammation may be triggered by the fimbriae themselves or by fimbriae-dependent delivery of other host activating molecules such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Although LPS activates systemic inflammation through the CD14 and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathways, mechanisms of epithelial cell activation by LPS are not well understood. These cells lack CD14 receptors and are unresponsive to pure LPS, but fimbriated Escherichia coli overcome this refractoriness and trigger epithelial cytokine responses. We now show that type 1 fimbriae can present an LPS- and TLR4-dependent signal to the CD14-negative epithelial cells. Human uroepithelial cells were shown to express TLR4, and type 1 fimbriated E. coli strains triggered an LPS-dependent response in those cells. A similar LPS- and fimbriae-dependent response was observed in the urinary tract of TLR4-proficient mice, but not in TLR4-defective mice. The moderate inflammatory response in the TLR4-defective mice was fimbriae dependent but LPS independent. The results demonstrate that type 1 fimbriae present LPS to CD14-negative cells and that the TLR4 genotype determines this response despite the absence of CD14 on the target cells. The results illustrate how the host "sees" LPS and other microbial products not as purified molecules but as complexes, and that fimbriae determine the molecular context in which LPS is presented to host cells.     

Lipopolysaccharide needs soluble CD14 to interact with TLR4 in human monocytes depleted of membrane CD14

Toll-like receptors recognize specific patterns of microbial components and regulate the activation of both innate and adaptive immunity. TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in monocytes/macrophages with the help of other molecules like CD14 and MD-2, which indicates that the functional LPS receptor forms a large complex. The functional relationship between the components has been the subject of debate, as have the modifications induced by the ligand in the expression of some of these components. Moreover, as for other members of this family of receptors, the possible direct interaction of receptors and their ligands is a matter of discussion. In this paper we address the question of whether the expression of some of the components influences the expression of the rest. Human monocytes in which CD14 has been downregulated through interference in the turnover of the molecule at the Golgi level, show normal membrane TLR4 expression, when compared with control cells. On the other hand, LPS alters membrane TLR4 expression by monocytes devoid of membrane CD14 only in the presence of human serum. The effect of serum is blocked by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies, which strongly suggests a functional role for soluble CD14/LPS complexes in the interaction with TLR4. Our data add information on the relationship between the components of the LPS receptor and the characteristics of the interaction of LPS and TLR4 in cells devoid of membrane CD14.     

Structure-function analysis of CD14 as a soluble receptor for lipopolysaccharide

CD14 is a glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein expressed by myeloid cells and also circulates as a plasma protein lacking the glycophosphatidylinositol anchor. Both membrane and soluble CD14 function to enhance activation of cells by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which we refer to as receptor function. We have previously reported the LPS binding and cell activation functions of a group of five deletion mutants of CD14 (Viriyakosol, S., and Kirkland, T.N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 361-368). We have now studied the functional impact of these mutations on soluble CD14. We found that some deletions that abrogated LPS binding in membrane CD14 have no effect on LPS binding in soluble CD14. In fact, some of the soluble CD14 deletion mutants bound LPS with an apparent higher affinity than wild-type CD14. Furthermore, we found that all five deletions essentially ablated soluble CD14 LPS receptor function, whereas only two of the deletions completely destroyed membrane CD14 LPS receptor function. Some of the mutants were able to compete with wild-type CD14 in soluble CD14-dependent assays of cellular activation. We concluded that the soluble and membrane forms of CD14 have different structural determinants for LPS receptor function.     

Lipopolysaccharide stimulates HepG2 human hepatoma cells in the presence of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein via CD14.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP), an opsonin for activation of macrophages by bacterial LPS, is synthesized in hepatocytes and is known to be an acute phase protein. Recently, cytokine-induced production of LBP was reported to increase 10-fold in hepatocytes isolated from LPS-treated rats, compared with those from normal rats. However, the mechanism by which the LPS treatment enhances the effect of cytokines remains to be clarified. In the present study, we examined whether LPS alone or an LPS/LBP complex directly stimulates the hepatocytes, leading to acceleration of the cytokine-induced LBP production. HepG2 cells (a human hepatoma cell line) were shown to express CD14, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored LPS receptor, by both RT/PCR and flow cytometric analyses. An LPS/LBP complex was an effective stimulator for LBP and CD14 production in HepG2 cells, but stimulation of the cells with either LPS or LBP alone did not significantly accelerate the production of these proteins. The findings were confirmed by semiquantitative RT/PCR analysis of mRNA levels of LBP and CD14 in HepG2 cells after stimulation with LPS alone and an LPS/LBP complex. In addition, two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD14 (3C10 and MEM-18) inhibited LPS/LBP-induced cellular responses of HepG2 cells. Furthermore, prestimulation of HepG2 cells with LPS/LBP augmented cytokine-induced production and gene expression of LBP and CD14. All these findings suggest that an LPS/LBP complex, but not free LPS, stimulates HepG2 cells via CD14 leading to increased basal and cytokine-induced LBP and CD14 production.     

Induction of bacterial lipoprotein tolerance is associated with suppression of toll-like receptor 2 expression

Tolerance to bacterial cell wall components including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may represent an essential regulatory mechanism during bacterial infection. Two members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, TLR2 and TLR4, recognize the specific pattern of bacterial cell wall components. TLR4 has been found to be responsible for LPS tolerance. However, the role of TLR2 in bacterial lipoprotein (BLP) tolerance and LPS tolerance is unclear. Pretreatment of human THP-1 monocytic cells with a synthetic bacterial lipopeptide induced tolerance to a second BLP challenge with diminished tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 production, termed BLP tolerance. Furthermore, BLP-tolerized THP-1 cells no longer responded to LPS stimulation, indicating a cross-tolerance to LPS. Induction of BLP tolerance was CD14-independent, as THP-1 cells that lack membrane-bound CD14 developed tolerance both in serum-free conditions and in the presence of a specific CD14 blocking monoclonal antibody (MEM-18). Pre-exposure of THP-1 cells to BLP suppressed mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation and nuclear factor-kappaB activation in response to subsequent BLP and LPS stimulation, which is comparable with that found in LPS-tolerized cells, indicating that BLP tolerance and LPS tolerance may share similar intracellular pathways. However, BLP strongly enhanced TLR2 expression in non-tolerized THP-1 cells, whereas LPS stimulation had no effect. Furthermore, a specific TLR2 blocking monoclonal antibody (2392) attenuated BLP-induced, but not LPS-induced, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 production, indicating BLP rather than LPS as a ligand for TLR2 engagement and activation. More importantly, pretreatment of THP-1 cells with BLP strongly inhibited TLR2 activation in response to subsequent BLP stimulation. In contrast, LPS tolerance did not prevent BLP-induced TLR2 overexpression. These results demonstrate that BLP tolerance develops through down-regulation of TLR2 expression.     

Negative Regulation of Toll-like Receptor-4 Signaling through the Binding of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Glycoprotein,CD14, with the Sialic Acid-binding Lectin,CD33

When monocyte-derived immature dendritic cells (imDCs) were stimulated with LPS in the presence of anti-CD33/Siglec-3 mAb, the production of IL-12 and phosphorylation of NF-κB decreased significantly. The cell surface proteins of imDCs were chemically cross-linked, and CD33-linked proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. It was CD14 that was found to be cross-linked with CD33. A proximity ligation assay also indicated that CD33 was colocalized with CD14 on the cell surface of imDCs. Sialic acid-dependent binding of CD33 to CD14 was confirmed by a plate assay using recombinant CD33 and CD14. Three types of cells (HEK293T cells expressing the LPS receptor complex (Toll-like receptor (TLR) cells), and the LPS receptor complex plus either wild-type CD33 (TLR/CD33WT cells) or mutated CD33 without sialic acid-binding activity (TLR/CD33RA cells)) were prepared, and then the binding and uptake of LPS were investigated. Although the level of LPS bound on the cell surface was similar among these cells, the uptake of LPS was reduced in TLR/CD33WT cells. A higher level of CD14-bound LPS and a lower level of TLR4-bound LPS were detected in TLR/CD33WT cells compared with the other two cell types, probably due to reduced presentation of LPS from CD14 to TLR4. Phosphorylation of NF-κB after stimulation with LPS was also compared. Wild-type CD33 but not mutated CD33 significantly reduced the phosphorylation of NF-κB. These results suggest that CD14 is an endogenous ligand for CD33 and that ligation of CD33 with CD14 modulates with the presentation of LPS from CD14 to TLR4, leading to down-regulation of TLR4-mediated signaling.