内江地区慢性乙型肝炎患者的基因型及拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯抗病毒治疗效果

目的 探讨内江地区慢性乙型肝炎患者的基因型及拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯抗病毒的治疗效果。方法 将201例慢性乙型肝炎患者进行HBV基因型的测定,其中120例HBeAg（+）慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为三组：A组、B组和C组,每组40例。A组给予拉米夫定(LAM)治疗;B组给予恩替卡韦(ETV)治疗;C组给予LAM联合阿德福韦酯(ADV)治疗,比较治疗情况。结果 201例慢性乙型肝炎患者中B型119例（59.2%）,C型68例（33.8%）,B/C混合型10例（5.0%）,未知型4例（2.0%）,各分型之间的性别、年龄差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。C型感染者HBeAg阳性率为86.8%,显著高于B型的51.3%（P＜0.05）。HBeAg（+）的3组患者治疗12、24和48周时,B组和C组患者的ALT复常率、HBV DNA阴转率及48周时的HBeAg血清转换率均显著高于A组（P＜0.05）;C组患者与B组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。治疗期间均未见不良反应发生。C组患者（包括B型19例、C型21例）中B型的HBV DNA阴转率及HBeAg血清转换率显著高于C型（P＜0.05）。结论 地处西南方的内江地区慢性乙型肝炎患者主要以B型为主,C型次之,B型和C型共占93.0%,其他型别仅占较少部分。ETV方案或LAM联合ADV方案治疗HBeAg（+）慢性乙肝疗效优于LAM治疗。初始LAM联合ADV治疗基因B型HBeAg（+）慢性乙型肝炎疗效优于C型。     

拉米夫定联合胸腺肽A1 治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察

目的:探讨拉米夫定(LAM)联合胸腺肽α1(Tα1)治疗慢性乙型肝炎的长期疗效和安全性。方法:72例慢性乙肝患者(HBV-DNA和HBeAg均阳性),按1:1随机分配进入联合治疗组(LAM+Tα1组)和单用拉米夫定组(LAM组)。结果:治疗1年时LAM+Tα1组HBeAg血清转换率(44.4%,16/36例)明显高于LAM组(5.6%,2/36例),P<0.01。停药1年后,持续的HBeAg血清转换率分别为36.1%(13/36例)和8.3%(3/36例),P<0.01。治疗过程中及停药后,两组HBV-DNA水平均明显下降,但两组的HBV-DNA转阴率相仿。治疗后1年ALT复常率联合治疗组与拉米夫定组相似,分别为75%(27/36例)和66.7%(24/36例)、随访1年时ALT复常率联合治疗组明显高于拉米夫定组,分别为58.3%(21/36例)和16.7%(6/36例)。在治疗过程中,未发现严重的不良反应。结论:LAM联合Tα1治疗慢性乙肝,不良反应少,疗效优于单一LAM用药组。     

Deep Sequencing Analysis of HBV Genotype Shift and Correlation with Antiviral Efficiency during Adefovir Dipivoxil Therapy

Background

Viral genotype shift in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients during antiviral therapy has been reported, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive.

Methods

38 CHB patients treated with ADV for one year were selected for studying genotype shift by both deep sequencing and Sanger sequencing method.

Results

Sanger sequencing method found that 7.9% patients showed mixed genotype before ADV therapy. In contrast, all 38 patients showed mixed genotype before ADV treatment by deep sequencing. 95.5% mixed genotype rate was also obtained from additional 200 treatment-naïve CHB patients. Of the 13 patients with genotype shift, the fraction of the minor genotype in 5 patients (38%) increased gradually during the course of ADV treatment. Furthermore, responses to ADV and HBeAg seroconversion were associated with the high rate of genotype shift, suggesting drug and immune pressure may be key factors to induce genotype shift. Interestingly, patients with genotype C had a significantly higher rate of genotype shift than genotype B. In genotype shift group, ADV treatment induced a marked enhancement of genotype B ratio accompanied by a reduction of genotype C ratio, suggesting genotype C may be more sensitive to ADV than genotype B. Moreover, patients with dominant genotype C may have a better therapeutic effect. Finally, genotype shifts was correlated with clinical improvement in terms of ALT.

Conclusions

Our findings provided a rational explanation for genotype shift among ADV-treated CHB patients. The genotype and genotype shift might be associated with antiviral efficiency.     

Clinical and virological response to adefovir dipovixil for lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-negative hepatitis B

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), a new nucleotide analogue, has demonstrated activity against lamivudine-resistant HBV both in vivo and in vitro. Herein, we present eight lamivudine-resistant patients with chronic anti-HBe positive hepatitis B treated orally with adefovir dipivoxil at 10 mg/die to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drug and to determine the possible development of clinical ADV resistance. After 48 weeks of therapy, 4/8 (50%) patients demonstrated a complete response with normalization of alaninoaminotransferase levels (ALT, normal value < 40 IU/L) and undetectable serum HBV- DNA (< 100 copies/ml tested by a PCR assay). In 3/8 subjects (37.5%), we observed a partial response with a > 50% reduction of both ALT and HBV DNA levels. Only one patient did not respond. Adefovir was well-tolerated and no patient presented adverse events related to treatment; there were no changes in renal parameters. We conclude that in patients with anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B resistant to lamivudine, a 48-week ADV treatment resulted in significant biochemical and virological improvement without major adverse effects.     

替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯与恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效比较

目的 评价替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯与恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效及安全性.方法 138例患者单盲分组,替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯组69例,恩替卡韦组69例,比较两组患者在治疗的第4、8、12、24、52周时HBV-DNA转阴率、ALT复常率,12、24和52周HBeAg转阴及血清学转换率,及24、52周完全应答率.结果 与基线相比,两组患者治疗4、8、12、24和52周时的不同时间阶段HBV-DNA转阴率及ALT复常率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).治疗24、52周替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯组患者的HBeAg转阴率及血清学转换率均优于恩替卡韦组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).总有效率在治疗第24、52周时进行两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).两组安全性及耐受性均相似,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯组与恩替卡韦组均具有强效的HBV-DNA抑制作用,在4、8、12、24和52周的不同时间阶段抗病毒疗效均相似.替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯组具有更显著的HBeAg转阴率及血清转换率和完全应答率,在治疗第24、52周尤为明显,两组ALT复常率相似,替比夫定联合阿德福韦酯和恩替卡韦均具有良好的安全性和耐受性.     

阿德福韦酯联合乙肝免疫球蛋白预防HBV 相关性终末期肝病肝移植术 后复发的临床研究

目的:探讨阿德福韦酯(HDV)联合乙肝免疫球蛋白(HBIg)预防HBV相关性终末期肝病患者肝移植术后HBV复发的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2005年6月～2009年6月北京市解放军第302医院因HBV相关性终末期肝病接受肝移植的60例患者的临床资料。60例患者根据治疗方法分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发,对照组采用拉米夫定(LAM)联合HBIg预防HBV复发。结果:两组患者随访期内未出现肾毒性表现。治疗组平均随访时间为(21.67±5.37)月,随访期内无复发。对照组平均随访时间为(21.83±6.02)月,随访期内有2例复发。两组术后复发率比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发近期疗效优于LAM联合HBIg。     

恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg 阳性乙型肝炎临床观察

目的:探讨恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙型肝炎的疗效与安全性。方法:140例慢性乙肝患者随机分为2组:观察组予恩替卡韦0.5 mg/d,对照组予拉米夫定100 mg/d,疗程均为48周。观察两组HBV DNA阴转率、ALT复常率、HbeAg血清转换率以及不良反应发生情况。结果:在治疗12周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA阴转率分别为47.1%、22.9%(P<0.01),ALT复常率分别为51.4%、31.4%(P<0.05),在治疗48周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA阴转率分别为88.6%、48.6%(P<0.01),ALT复常率分别为90.0%、72.9%(P<0.01)。HbeAg血清转换率无统计学差异,两组患者未见严重不良反应。结论:恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙肝患者,较拉米夫定起效快、作用强,且安全性好。     

阿德福韦酯联合乙肝免疫球蛋白预防HBV相关性终末期肝病肝移植术后复发的临床研究

目的：探讨阿德福韦酯（HDV）联合乙肝免疫球蛋白（HBIg）预防HBV相关性终末期肝病患者肝移植术后HBV复发的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析2005年6月-2009年6月北京市解放军第302医院因HBV相关性终末期肝病接受肝移植的60例患者的临床资料。60例患者根据治疗方法分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用HDV联合HBk预防肝移植术后HBV复发,对照组采用拉米夫定（LAM）联合HBIg预防HBV复发。结果：两组患者随访期内未出现肾毒性表现。治疗组平均随访时间为（21．67±5．37）月,随访期内无复发。对照组平均随访时间为（21．83±6．02）月,随访期内有2例复发。两组术后复发率比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。结论：HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发近期疗效优于LAM联合HBIg。     

恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙型肝炎临床观察

目的：探讨恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙型肝炎的疗效与安全性。方法：140例慢性乙肝患者随机分为2组：观察组予恩替卡韦0．5mg／d,对照组予拉米夫定100mg／d,疗程均为48周。观察两组HBVDNA阴转率、ALT复常率、HbeAg血清转换率以及不良反应发生情况。结果：在治疗12周后,观察组与对照组HBVDNA阴转率分别为47．1％、22．9％（P〈0．01）,ALT复常率分别为51．4％、31．4％（P〈0．05）,在治疗48周后,观察组与对照组HBVDNA阴转率分别为88．6％、48．6％（P〈0．01）,ALT复常率分别为90．0％、72．9％（P〈0．01）。HbeAg血清转换率无统计学差异,两组患者未见严重不良反应。结论：恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙肝患者,较拉米夫定起效快、作用强,且安全性好。     

The Efficacy and Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Patients with Spontaneous Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Spontaneous acute exacerbation (AE) of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is often detrimental but sometimes leads to sustained immune control and disease remission. The efficacy and safety of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in patients with spontaneous AE of CHB remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of NAs in patients with spontaneous AE of CHB. We calculated pooled effects of NAs in these patients of each study and conducted quantitative meta-analysis, displaying results using Forest plots.

Results

15 studies were included and substantial heterogeneity was noted in the inclusion/exclusion criteria and controls. Pooled data showed no benefit of lamivudine (LAM) vs. untreated controls for transplant-free survival in patients with spontaneous AE of CHB (OR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.50–1.92; P = 0.956)), hepatic decompensation (OR = 0.94 (95% CI, 0.47–1.88; P = 0.862)) and liver failure owing to AE (OR = 2.30 (95% CI, 0.35–15.37; P = 0.387)) at 3 months. Entecavir achieved even higher short-term mortality than LAM. NAs led to rates of ALT normalization, undetectable HBV DNA, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion and drug resistance at 1 year in 88%, 61%, 46%, 35% and 5%. Pooled data also showed benefit favoring LAM vs. untreated controls for ALT normalization (OR = 1.98 (95% CI, 1.03–3.80; P = 0.039)) and undetectable HBV DNA (OR = 38.50 (95% CI, 7.68–192.99; P<0.001)) at 3 months. All NAs were relatively safe and well tolerated.

Conclusion

NAs had no obvious impact on short-term survival in patients with AE of CHB, despite of possible better antiviral responses. We suggest additional studies to evaluate the efficacy of other NAs and early introduction of immunosuppressant in combination with NAs. We highlight developing prognostic models to identify predictors of mortality and disease progression for AE of CHB.     

干扰素α-1b联合阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎疗效分析

目的：探讨干扰素α-1b联合阿德福韦酯（Adefovir Dipivoxil Tablets,ADV）治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎（ChronichepatitisB,CHB）患者临床疗效。方法：随即将120例CHB患者分为3组：单用ADV组（A组）40例;单用IFNa-1b组（B组）40例;IFNα-1b和ADV联合治疗组（c组）40例,疗程48周。分别于治疗12周、24周和48周时查ALT复常率,HIhAg血清转换率,乙型肝炎病毒（hepatitisBvirus,HBV）DNA阴转率。其中各组中10人于治疗前及治疗48周行肝穿刺活检术,观察病理改变,根据炎症活动度（G）和纤维化程度（S）进行计分,同时采用纤维化半定量计分系统（sss）评分。结果：A组和B组ALT复常率,24周：X^2=4．80、7．92,48周：X^2=3．97、6．51,P均〈0．05;HBeAg转换率,24周：X^2=12.25、4．17,48周：X^2=-14．57、4．94。P均〈0．01;HBVDNA转阴率。24周：X2=-3．74、9．77,48周：X^2=6．98、11．95,P均〈0．05。c组24周和48周后ALT复常率分别为65．0％和87．5％,HBeAg转换率为35．0％和45．0％,HBVDNA阴转率为75．5％和92．5％,显著高于A组和B组。组织学肝纤维化各项评分结果联合治疗组均优于单药组,差异有统计学意Y,．（SSS：t=-23．26、48．98;G：t=-53．88、94．30;S：t=-60．00、82．05,P均〈0．01）。结论：IFN联合ADV治疗CHB患者可协同抑制HBV复制,显著提高抗HBV疗效,且无明显不良反应。是一种有效的治疗方法。     

复方鳖甲软肝片联合阿德福韦酯对乙肝肝硬化患者肝功能和乙肝血清标 志物水平的影响

目的:探讨复方鳖甲软肝片联合阿德福韦酯对乙肝肝硬化患者肝功能和乙肝血清标志物水平的影响。方法:选择我院进行治疗的乙肝肝硬化患者60例,随机分为实验组与对照组,每组30例。对照组患者给予阿德福韦酯治疗,实验组患者在对照组基础上给予复方鳖甲软肝片治疗。比较治疗前后两组患者血浆白蛋白(ALB)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、血清总胆红素(TBIL)及凝血酶源时间(PT)水平、不良反应、HBe Ag转阴率、HBV-DNA转阴率及HBe Ag血清转化率。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后的血清ALB水平均升高,血清ALT、TBIL及PT水平均降低(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者的血清ALB水平、HBe Ag转阴率、HBV-DNA转阴率及HBe Ag血清转化率较高,血清ALT、TBIL、PT水平、不良反应发生率较低(P0.05)。结论:复方鳖甲软肝片联合阿德福韦酯较单用阿德福韦酯可更有效改善乙肝肝硬化患者的肝功能,并抑制病毒的复制,且安全性较高。     

恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽α1治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效研究

目的：观察和比较恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽α1治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效。方法：选取我院58例HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者分成联合组和对照组。联合组28例,初始同时使用恩替卡韦及胸腺肽αl24周,之后停胸腺肽αl继续用恩替卡韦至48周。对照组30例,单用恩替卡韦0．5mg／d,48周。定期检测ALT复常率,HBVDNA转阴率,HBeAg／抗HBe血清转换率,肝纤维化组合,Fibroscan评分两组在治疗结束时进行疗效评价。结果：24周时两组ALT复常率无差异显著性（P〉0．05）,联合组和对照组HBVDNA阴转率在24周、48周时均差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。联合组与单用组HBeAg血清转换率在第24周、48周时,两组比较差异均有显著性（P〈0．05）。肝纤维化组合各指标（HA,LN,PIIIP,Ⅳ型胶原）,Fibroscan评分两组治疗48周后比较差异均有显著性（P〈0．05）,且两组治疗前后差异联合组更显著。治疗过程中,未发现明显副作用。结论：恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽d1治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎,安全性与耐受性良好,联合组在ALT复常率,HBeAg血清转换率和HBVDNA转阴率,抗肝纤维仲韵井种P昂荽楫干蕈闱凰巷卡韦组．     

抗原抗体复合物型治疗性疫苗(乙克)临床研究中患者血清乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原下降的分析与启示

近年来全球慢性乙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis B,CHB)防治指南提出了“功能性治愈”(functional cure)的概念,即患者经过治疗达到血清乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(hepatitis B virus surface antigen,HBsAg)消失,但现有抗病毒治疗很难实现这一目标。本研究对既往临床试验中经抗原抗体复合物型治疗性疫苗(乙克)治疗后的CHB患者HBsAg下降情况进行了归纳分析,结果显示,经乙克治疗随访后达到乙型肝炎e抗原(hepatitis B e antigen,HBeAg)血清学转换者的HBsAg下降高达0.95log₁₀IU/mL,显著高于未达到HBeAg血清学转换者的0.32log₁₀IU/mL(P<0.01),而经氢氧化铝佐剂治疗随访后发生HBeAg血清学转换(0.49log₁₀IU/mL)者与未发生HBeAg血清学转换者(0.36log₁₀IU/mL)之间HBsAg下降无统计学差异。乙克组治疗过程中,丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)骤升(ALT flare)在HBsAg下降>1.0log₁₀IU/mL者中较多见,氢氧化铝组未观察到此现象。回归分析显示,乙克治疗后HBsAg下降的影响因素有患者出现HBeAg血清学转换、感染的HBV为B基因型、治疗过程中ALT出现10倍增高,以及基线血清HBsAg为高水平。结果提示,乙克诱导的特异性免疫对降低CHB患者血清HBsAg水平有一定效果,采用“抗病毒药物治疗＋针对HBsAg的中和性抗体被动免疫＋乙克主动免疫”的“三明治”治疗策略可能会提高“功能性治愈”率。     

聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b治疗61例e抗原阳性慢性乙型肝炎临床分析

目的探讨聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b治疗e抗原(HBeAg)阳性慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效和不良反应,同时探讨影响应答的相关因素。方法用聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b治疗61例HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎,治疗期间定期监测血常规、生物化学指标、病毒学标志、甲状腺功能等。结果 48周,表面抗原(HBsAg)和HBeAg血清学转换率分别为5.26%、31.2%;血清HBV DNA阴转率为59.6%;ALT复常率为64.9%。随访半年,HBV DNA复发率为17.4%;HBeAg血清学转换者维持应答。治疗前ALT>5 ULN时,48周时HBeAg血清学转换率和HBV DNA阴转率明显高于ALT<5 ULN时,二者比较差异有统计学意义;而血清HBV DNA水平与其无明显相关性。结论聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b具有免疫调节和抗病毒双重作用,48周时HBeAg血清学转换率和HBV DNA阴转率与治疗前血清ALT水平与相关,停药后具有持续应答效应。     

Association between hepatic steatosis and entecavir treatment failure in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B

Background

The coexistence of HBV infection and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) becomes characteristic of liver disease in China, with unknown bilateral influence. We aimed to investigate the effect of hepatic steatosis, a common hepatocyte change in NAFLD, on antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods and Findings

We carried out a prospective nested case control study in CHB patients receiving Entecavir for initial antiviral therapy, by recording demographic, anthropometric and clinical data at baseline, 24^wk, 48^wk and 96^wk. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were applied to find out independent factors of hepatic steatosis and Entecavir treatment failure. The rates of HBV-DNA clearance, HBeAg seroconversion and ALT normalization were compared between CHB patients with and without steatosis by post hoc analysis. A total of 267 Chinese patients with CHB entered final analysis, with overall percentages of hepatic steatosis and HBeAg positive as 30.5% and 62.4%. Multivariate analysis showed waist circumference, serum TG and uric acid levels were independent factors of hepatic steatosis. The response rates to Entecavir were 54.9%, 63.8%, 74.2% at 24^wk, 48^wk and 96^wk. Hepatic steatosis was revealed as an independent factor of Entecavir treatment failure by multivariate logistic regression at 24^wk, 48^wk and 96^wk. In CHB patients with hepatic steatosis, HBV-DNA clearance and HBeAg seroconversion were both lower throughout the follow-up, but only the former reached statistical significance. Besides, ALT normalization was also significantly lower at 24^wk and 48^wk.

Conclusion

Hepatic steatosis is significantly associated with Entecavir treatment failure and metabolic factors are independent factors of hepatic steatosis in CHB patients, which called for a specified antiviral strategy in CHB patients with NAFLD.     

苦参碱联合恩替卡韦抗乙型肝炎病毒感染的作用及其机制

目的:探讨苦参碱联合恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的疗效并初步探讨其作用机制。方法:选择2014年9月-2016年8月我院收治的HBeAg阳性乙肝患者98例,按治疗方法分为对照组和观察组,每组49例。对照组患者给予恩替卡韦治疗,观察组患者在对照组基础上应用苦参碱联合治疗。分别在治疗后12、24、48周观察和比较两组患者的HBeAg转阴率、ALT复常率、HBV DNA转阴率、血清球蛋白水平。结果:观察组在治疗后24、48周的HBeAg转阴率、ALT复常率、HBV DNA转阴率均显著高于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组血清球蛋白水平明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组间不良反应发生情况比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:苦参碱联合恩替卡韦对于HBV具有较好的协同治疗作用,且安全性较好,可能与苦参碱降低血清转氨酶水平,增强患者免疫功能有关。     

五酯丸联合阿德福韦酯对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝功能及血清细胞因子IL-17、IL-22的影响

目的:探讨五酯丸联合阿德福韦酯对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝功能及血清细胞因子白介素-17(IL-17)、白介素-22(IL-22)的影响。方法:选取2016年3月2018年3月期间我院收治的CHB患者118例,根据随机数字表法分为对照组(n=59)和研究组(n=59),对照组患者给予阿德福韦酯治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上联合五酯丸治疗,比较两组患者疗效、肝功能指标[门冬氨酸氨基转氨酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBIL)]、血清细胞因子IL-17、IL-22、乙肝病毒基因(HBV-DNA)以及乙型肝炎病毒e抗原(HBeAg)阴转情况,记录两组治疗期间不良反应情况。结果:研究组治疗6个月后的临床总有效率为93.22%(55/59),高于对照组患者的79.66%(47/59)(P<0.05)。两组治疗6个月后ALT、AST、TBIL均下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗6个月后IL-17、IL-22均下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者HBV-DNA、HbeAg阴转率比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组不良反应发生率对比未见统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:五酯丸联合阿德福韦酯治疗CHB患者,虽不会增加抗病毒应答,但可改善机体肝功能,降低血清细胞因子IL-17、IL-22水平。     

基线HBsAg和ALT水平是替比夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者e抗原血清学转换的重要预测因素

目的评价初治、单药使用替比夫定治疗HBeAg阳性的慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者48周的e抗原血清学转换的基线预测因素。方法97例HBeAg阳性CHB患者分别以基线HBsAg、ALT和HBVDNA水平高低分组,对比两组治疗48周时生化学、病毒学和血清学应答情况。结果基线HBsAg-101500IU／mL组e抗原阴转率和血清学转换率均为42．3％,基线HBsAg〉1500IU／mL组分别为20％和17．8％,两组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;基线ALT〉5ULN组e抗原阴转率和血清学转换率均为45．1％,基线ALT05ULN组分别17．4％和15．2％,两组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;基线HBVDNA〈8．0log-10copies／mL组和基线HBVDNA≥8．0log-10copies／mL组e抗原阴转率和血清学转换率相比,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;基线水平HBsAg≤1500IU／mL且ALT〉5ULN的CHB患者共40例作为观察组,其余57例患者作为对照组,治疗48周时观察组e抗原阴转率和血清学转换率均为45％,对照组分别为22．8％和21．1％,两组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论基线HBsAg水平≤1500IU／mL和ALT水平〉5ULN的HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者,在接受替比夫定治疗48周时,有较高的e抗原转阴率和血清学转换率;基线HBsAg和ALT水平是替比夫定治疗e抗原血清学转换的重要预测因素。     

双歧三联活菌片与小儿止泻安颗粒对急性腹泻患儿血清IL-7、心肌酶及同工酶水平的影响

目的:探讨双歧三联活菌片联合小儿止泻安颗粒对小儿急性腹泻患儿血清IL-7、心肌酶及同工酶水平的影响。方法:收集我院就诊的120例小儿急性腹泻患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组60例。对照组患者给予双歧三联活菌片口服治疗;实验组在对照组基础上给予小儿止泻安颗粒口服治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、白介素-7(IL-7)以及临床治疗有效率。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后AST、ALT、LDH、CK、CK-MB水平均显著下降,IL-7水平明显升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者的血清AST、ALT、LDH、CK、CK-MB水平较低,IL-7水平较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者的临床治疗有效率较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:双歧三联活菌片联合小儿止泻安颗粒能够降低小儿急性腹泻患者血清心肌酶、同工酶水平,升高IL-7水平,临床疗效较好。