Effect of modification of tRNA nucleotide 37 on the tRNA interaction with the A and P sites of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome

The modified nucleotide 3′ of the tRNA anticodon is an important structural element that regulates the codon-anticodon interaction in the ribosome by stacking with codon-anticodon bases. The presence and identity (pyrimidine, purine, or modified purine) of this nucleotide significantly affects the energy of stacking in the A and P sites of the ribosome. Modification of nucleotide 37 does not contribute to stacking in the A site of the 70S ribosome, while its effect is substantial in the P site. The enthalpies of tRNA interactions with the A and P sites in the ribosome are similar and considerably lower than the enthalpy of the interactions of two tRNAs with the cognate anticodons in solution, suggesting that the ribosome contributes to the enthalpy-related portion of the free energy of tRNA binding by directly forming additional interactions with tRNA or by indirectly stabilizing the conformation of the codon-anticodon complex. In addition to stacking, tRNA binding in the A and P sites is further stabilized by interactions that involve magnesium ions. The number of ions involved in the formation of the tRNA-ribosome complex depends on the identity of tRNA nucleotide 37.     

The effect of modification of nucleotide-37 on the interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA with the A-site of the 70S ribosome

To estimate the effect of modified nucleotide-37, the interaction of two yeast aminoacyl-tRNAs (Phe-tRNAK+YPhe and Phe-tRNAK-YPhe) with the A site of complex [70S.poly(U).deacylated tRNA(Phe) in the P site] was assayed at 0-20 degrees C. As comparisons with native Phe-tRNAK+YPhe showed, removal of the Y base decreased the association constant of Phe-tRNAK-YPhe and the complex by an order of magnitude at any temperature, and increased the enthalpy of their interaction by 23 kJ/mol. When the Y base was present in the anticodon loop of deacylated tRNA(Phe) bound to the P site of the 70S ribosome, twice higher affinity for the A site was observed for Phe-tRNAK-YPhe but not for Phe-tRNAK+YPhe. Thus, the modified nucleotide 3' of the Phe-tRNA(Phe) anticodon stabilized the codon-anticodon interaction both in the A and in the P sites of the 70S ribosome.     

Solution conformations of unmodified and A(37)N(6)-dimethylallyl modified anticodon stem-loops of Escherichia coli tRNA(Phe)

The modification of RNA nucleotide bases, a fundamental process in all cells, alters the chemical and physical properties of RNA molecules and broadly impacts the physiological properties of cells. tRNA molecules are by far the most diverse-modified RNA species within cells, containing as a group >80% of the known 96 chemically unique nucleic acid modifications. The greatest varieties of modifications are located on residue 37 and play a role in ensuring fidelity and efficiency of protein synthesis. The enzyme dimethylallyl (Delta(2)-isopentenyl) diphosphate:tRNA transferase catalyzes the addition of a dimethylallyl group to the exocyclic amine nitrogen (N6) of A(37) in several tRNA species. Using a 17 residue oligoribonucleotide corresponding to the anticodon arm of Escherichia coli tRNA(Phe), we have investigated the structural and dynamic changes introduced by the dimethylallyl group. The unmodified RNA molecule adopts stem-loop conformation composed of seven base-pairs and a compact three nucleotide loop. This conformation is distinctly different from the U-turn motif that characterizes the anticodon arm in the X-ray crystal structure of the fully modified yeast tRNA(Phe). The adoption of the tri-nucleotide loop by the purine-rich unmodified tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm suggests that other anticodon sequences, especially those containing pyrimidine bases, also may favor a tri-loop conformation. Introduction of the dimethylallyl modification increases the mobility of nucleotides of the loop region but does not dramatically alter the RNA conformation. The dimethylallyl modification may enhance ribosome binding through multiple mechanisms including destabilization of the closed anticodon loop and stabilization of the codon-anticodon helix.     

Yeast initiator tRNA identity elements cooperate to influence multiple steps of translation initiation

All three kingdoms of life employ two methionine tRNAs, one for translation initiation and the other for insertion of methionines at internal positions within growing polypeptide chains. We have used a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system to explore the interactions of the initiator tRNA with the translation initiation machinery. Our data indicate that in addition to its previously characterized role in binding of the initiator tRNA to eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), the initiator-specific A1:U72 base pair at the top of the acceptor stem is important for the binding of the eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit. We have also shown that the initiator-specific G:C base pairs in the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA are required for the strong thermodynamic coupling between binding of the ternary complex and mRNA to the ribosome. This coupling reflects interactions that occur within the complex upon recognition of the start codon, suggesting that these initiator-specific G:C pairs influence this step. The effect of these anticodon stem identity elements is influenced by bases in the T loop of the tRNA, suggesting that conformational coupling between the D-loop-T-loop substructure and the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA may occur during AUG codon selection in the ribosomal P-site, similar to the conformational coupling that occurs in A-site tRNAs engaged in mRNA decoding during the elongation phase of protein synthesis.     

Translocation of a tRNA with an extended anticodon through the ribosome

Coordinated translocation of the tRNA-mRNA complex by the ribosome occurs in a precise, stepwise movement corresponding to a distance of three nucleotides along the mRNA. Frameshift suppressor tRNAs generally contain an extra nucleotide in the anticodon loop and they subvert the normal mechanisms used by the ribosome for frame maintenance. The mechanism by which suppressor tRNAs traverse the ribosome during translocation is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate translocation of a tRNA by four nucleotides from the A site to the P site, and from the P site to the E site. We show that translocation of a punctuated mRNA is possible with an extra, unpaired nucleotide between codons. Interestingly, the NMR structure of the four nucleotide anticodon stem-loop reveals a conformation different from the canonical tRNA structure. Flexibility within the loop may allow conformational adjustment upon A site binding and for interacting with the four nucleotide codon in order to shift the mRNA reading frame.     

Mechanism of translation based on intersubunit complementarities of ribosomal RNAs and tRNAs

A universal rule is found about nucleotide sequence complementarities between the regions 2653-2666 in the GTPase-binding site of 23S rRNA and 1064-1077 of 16S rRNA as well as between the region 1103-1107 of 16S rRNA and GUUCG (or GUUCA) of tRNAs. This rule holds for all species in the living kingdoms except for two protista mitochondrial rRNAs of Trypanosoma brucei and Plasmodium falciparum. We found that quite similar relationships for the two species hold under the assumption presented in the present paper. The complementarity between T-loop of tRNA and the region 1103-1107 of 16S rRNA suggests that the first interaction of a ribosome with aminoacyl-tRNAEF-TuGTP ternary complex or EF-GGDP complex could occur at the region 1103-1107 of 16S rRNA with the T-loop-D-loop contact region of the ternary complex or the domain IV-V bridge region of the EF-GGDP complex. The second interaction should occur between the A-site codon and the anticodon loop or between the anticodon stem/loop of A-site tRNA and the tip of domain IV of EF-G. The above stepwise interactions would facilitate the collision of the region 1064-1077 of 16S rRNA with the region around A2660 at the alpha-sarcin/ricin loop of 23S rRNA. In this way, the universal rule is capable of explaining how spectinomycin-binding region of 16S rRNA takes part in translocation, how GTPases such as EF-Tu and EF-G can be introduced into their binding site on the large subunit ribosome in proper orientation efficiently and also how driving forces for tRNA movement are produced in translocation and codon recognition. The analysis of T-loops of all tRNAs also presents an evolutionary trend from a random and seemingly primitive sequence, as defined to be Y type, to the most developed structure, such as either 5G7 or 5A7 types in the present definition.     

Interactions of yeast tRNAPhe with ribosomes from yeast and Escherichia coli. A fluorescence spectroscopic study.

The interaction of ethidium-labeled tRNAPhe from yeast with ribosomes from yeast and Escherichia coli was studied by stead-state measurements of fluorescence intensity and polarization. The ethidium label was covalently inserted into either the anticodon or the dihydrouridine loop of the tRNA. The codon-independent formation of a tRNA-ribosome complex led to only a moderate increase of the observed fluorescence polarization indicating a considerable internal mobility of the labeled parts of the tRNA molecule in the ribosome complex. When the ribosome complex was formed in the presence of poly(U), the probes both in the dihydrouridine loop and in the anticodon loop were strongly immobilized, the latter exhibiting a substantial increase in fluorescence intensity. A smaller intensity change was observed when E. coli ribosomes were used, although the extent of immobilization was found to be similar in this case. Competition experiments with non-labeled tRNAPhe showed that the labeled tRNAPheEtd was readily released from the complex with yeast ribosomes when poly(U) was absent, whereas in the presence of poly(U) it was bound practically irreversibly. The finding that the mobility of a probe in the dihydrouridine loop is affected by the codon-anticodon interaction on the ribosome suggests a conformational change of the ribosome-bound tRNA which may involve opening of the tertiary structure interactions between the dihydrouridine and the TpsiC loop.     

Temperature jump relaxation studies on the interactions between transfer RNAs with complementary anticodons. The effect of modified bases adjacent to the anticodon triplet

We have used the temperature-jump relaxation technique to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the association between the following tRNAs pairs having complementary anticodons: tRNA(Ser) with tRNA(Gly), tRNA(Cys) with tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Trp) with tRNA(Pro). The anticodon sequence of E. coli tRNA(Ser), GGA, is complementary to the U*CC anticodon of E. coli tRNA(Gly(2] (where U* is a still unknown modified uridine base) and A37 is not modified in none of these two tRNAs. E. coli tRNA(Ala) has a VGC anticodon (V is 5-oxyacetic acid uridine) while tRNA(Cys) has the complementary GCA anticodon with a modified adenine on the 3' side, namely 2-methylthio N6-isopentenyl adenine (mS2i6A37) in E. Coli tRNA(Cys) and N6-isopentenyl adenine (i6A37) in yeast tRNA(Cys). The brewer yeast tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CmCA) differs from the wild type E. coli tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CCA) in several positions of the nucleotide sequence. Nevertheless, in the anticodon loop, only two interesting differences are present: A37 is not modified while C34 at the first anticodon position is modified into a ribose 2'-O methyl derivative (Cm). The corresponding complementary tRNA is E.coli tRNA(Pro) with the VGG anticodon. Our results indicate a dominant effect of the nature and sequence of the anticodon bases and their nearest neighbor in the anticodon loop (particularly at position 37 on the 3' side); no detectable influence of modifications in the other tRNA stems has been detected. We found a strong stabilizing effect of the methylthio group on i6A37 as compared to isopentenyl modification of the same residue. We have not been able so far to assess the effect of isopentenyl modification alone in comparison to unmodified A37. The results obtained with the complex yeast tRNA(Trp)-E.coli tRNA(Pro) also suggest that a modification of C34 to Cm34 does not significantly increase the stability of tRNA(Trp) association with its complementary anticodon in tRNA(Pro). The observations are discussed in the light of inter- and intra-strand stacking interactions among the anticodon triplets and with the purine base adjacent to them, and of possible biological implications.     

Function of Y in codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA Phe

Molar association constants of binding oligonucleotides to the anticodon loops of (yeast) tRNA^Phe, (yeast) tRNA_HCl^Phe and (E. coli) tRNA_F^Met have been determined by equilibrium dialysis. From the temperature dependence of the molar association constants, ΔF, ΔH and ΔS of oligomer-anticodon loop interaction have been determined. The data indicate that the free energy change of codon-anticodon interaction is highly influenced by the presence of a modified purine (tRNA^Phe), of an unmodified purine (tRNA_F^Met) or its absence (tRNA_HCl^Phe). Excision of the modified purine Y in the anticodon loop of tRNA^Phe results in a conformational change of the anticodon loop, which is discussed on the basis of the corresponding changes in ΔF, ΔH and ΔS.     

The effect of specific structural modification on the biological activity of E. coli arginine tRNA.

Escherichia coli arginine tRNA1 has been modified at position s2C32 with iodoacetamide and a spin labelled derivative. The small effects on the charging ability of tRNA by the modifiications suggest that the synthetase does not bind to the tRNA in this region of the anticodon loop before the anticodon. A ternary complex of elongation factor Tu, GTP and the modified Arg-tRNA, can be formed allowing future studies of enzymatic binding to the ribosome. Using the triplet binding assay the native Arg-tRNA1 decodes all 4 codons beginning with CG. The modified Arg-tRNA1 has a restricted decoding but the decoding pattern is still unusual according to the Wobble Hypothesis.     

A kinetic recognition process for tRNA at the ribosome

In order to explain the great accuracy when amino acids are selected in protein synthesis, some authors have proposed a kinetic recognition process driven out of thermodynamic equilibrium. In this work, such a process for the recognition of the tRNA anticodon at the ribosome is considered. An important feature is that the discrimination possibility is determined not only by the differences of codon-anticodon binding energy (the only specific quantity) but also by the total binding energy including non specific bonds of other tRNA groups to the ribosome. In the context of this, the effects of streptomycin, and related features of mutant ribosome proteins or tRNA's which decrease or increase the selection accuracy can be interpreted by the kinetic model.     

Idiosyncratic tuning of tRNAs to achieve uniform ribosome binding

The binding of seven tRNA anticodons to their complementary codons on Escherichia coli ribosomes was substantially impaired, as compared with the binding of their natural tRNAs, when they were transplanted into tRNA(2)(Ala). An analysis of chimeras composed of tRNA(2)(Ala) and various amounts of either tRNA(3)(Gly) or tRNA(2)(Arg) indicates that the presence of the parental 32-38 nucleotide pair is sufficient to restore ribosome binding of the transplanted anticodons. Furthermore, mutagenesis of tRNA(2)(Ala) showed that its highly conserved A32-U38 pair serves to weaken ribosome affinity. We propose that this negative binding determinant is used to offset the very tight codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA(2)(Ala). This suggests that each tRNA sequence has coevolved with its anticodon to tune ribosome affinity to a value that is the same for all tRNAs.     

The solution structure of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA and its interactions with initiation factor 2 and the ribosomal 30 S subunit

The conformation of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA has been investigated using enzymatic and chemical probes. This study was conducted on the naked tRNA and on the tRNA involved in the various steps leading to the formation of the 30 S.IF-2.GTP.fMet-tRNA.AUG complex. A three-dimensional model of the initiator tRNA is presented, which displays several differences with yeast tRNAPhe: (i) the anticodon arm is more rigid; (ii) the presence of an additional nucleotide in the D loop results in specific features in both T and D loops; (iii) C1 and A72 might form a noncanonical base pair. Aminoacylation and formylation induce subtle conformational adjustments near the 3' end, the T arm and the D loop. Initiation factor (IF) 2 interacts with a rather limited portion of the tRNA, covering the T loop and the minor groove of the T stem, and induces an increased flexibility in the anticodon arm. The specific structural features observed in the T loop are probably recognized by IF-2. In the 30 S.IF-2.GTP.fMet-tRNA.AUG complex, additional protections are observed in the acceptor stem and in the anticodon arm, resulting from a strong steric hindrance and from the codon-anticodon interaction within the subunit decoding site.     

Distinct determinants of tRNA recognition by the TrmD and Trm5 methyl transferases

TrmD and Trm5 are, respectively, the bacterial and eukarya/archaea methyl transferases that catalyze transfer of the methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet) to the N1 position of G37 in tRNA to synthesize m1G37-tRNA. The m1G37 modification prevents tRNA frameshifts on the ribosome by assuring correct codon-anticodon pairings, and thus is essential for the fidelity of protein synthesis. Although TrmD and Trm5 are derived from unrelated AdoMet families and recognize the cofactor using distinct motifs, the question of whether they select G37 on tRNA by the same, or different, mechanism has not been answered. Here we address this question by kinetic analysis of tRNA truncation mutants that lack domains typically present in the canonical L shaped structure, and by evaluation of the site of modification on tRNA variants with an expanded or contracted anticodon loop. With both experimental approaches, we show that TrmD and Trm5 exhibit separate and distinct mode of tRNA recognition, suggesting that they evolved by independent and non-overlapping pathways from their unrelated AdoMet families. Our results also shed new light onto the significance of the m1G37 modification in the controversial quadruplet-pairing model of tRNA frameshift suppressors.     

Interaction of yeast tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm with 40S ribosomal subunit of rabbit liver.

The 15-nucleotide analog of yeast tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm binds cooperatively to two sites of poly(U) programmed 40S ribosome like intact tRNA(Phe). The cooperativity coefficients appeared to be about 4 for tRNA(Phe) and 50 for its anticodon arm. Anticodon arm contributes the majority of free energy of tRNA binding to a programmed 40S ribosomal subunit. The correct codon-anticodon pairing seems to play the key role in the cooperativity origin. Contrary to the anticodon arm template independent binding of the whole tRNA to the small ribosomal subunit is revealed.     

Two tRNA-binding sites in addition to A and P sites on eukaryotic ribosomes.

The interaction of tRNA with 80 S ribosomes from rabbit liver was studied using biochemical as well as fluorescence techniques. Besides the canonical A and P sites, two additional sites were found which specifically bind deacylated tRNA. One of the sites is analogous to the E site of prokaryotic ribosomes, in that binding of tRNA is labile, does not depend on codon-anticodon interaction, does not protect the anticodon loop from solvent access, and requires the presence of the 3'-terminal adenosine of the tRNA. In contrast, the stability of the tRNA complex with the second site (S site) is high. tRNA binding to the S site is also codon-independent; nevertheless, the anticodon loop is shielded from solvent access. Removal of the 3'-terminal adenosine decreases the affinity of tRNA(Phe) for the S site approximately 50-fold. tRNA(Phe) is retained at the S site during translocation and through poly(Phe) synthesis. Thus, the S site does not seem to be an intermediate site for the tRNA during the elongation cycle. Rather, the tRNA bound to the S site may allosterically modulate the function of the ribosome.