Gene activation at a distance and telomeric silencing are not affected by yeast histone H1

Until recently, it was believed that the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has no histone H1 gene. However, a search of the yeast genome database revealed a possible H1 homologue of 258 amino acids, termed yeast histone H1 (HHO1). The protein shows 36% identity to the human H1 core domain over a stretch of 93 amino acids. Unlike other H1 proteins, Hho1p has a second possible core domain which shows 43% identity to the first core domain. Since vertebrate H1 histone had been implied in gene repression as well as gene activation at a distance, we tested the effect of deleting the yeast H1-like gene on remote activation of a modified GAL1 promoter, which contains a synthetic GAL4 binding site close to the TATA box, and the natural UAS_G, consisting of four GAL4 binding sites. Different spacing up to 1.8 kb between the proximal binding site and the distal UAS_G enhancer revealed no differences in gene activation between wild-type and knockout strains. Overexpression of a heterologous histone H1 from sea urchin showed an overall inhibition of gene activation by the GAL1 promoter, whereas overexpression of the yeast histone H1 had no effect. Also, the expression of A1, ALPHA2 or SUC2 genes, all of which are known to be responsive to an altered chromatin structure, was unchanged in HHO1 knockout or HHO1-overexpressing strains when compared to wild-type cells. We also considered the possibility that HHO1 was involved in forming the heterochromatin at telomeres. On testing for telomeric silencing of a URA reporter gene introduced 1.3 kb away from the chromosomal end, we again observed no differences between wild-type and knockout strains. Thus, the yeast histone H1-like gene appears to have no role in gene activation at a distance or in silencing under the conditions tested. It remains to be seen whether the yeast H1 histone is a gene-specific regulator rather than a general chromatin-associated protein. Received: 16 April 1997 / Accepted: 4 July 1997     

Sir2 deacetylates histone H3 lysine 56 to regulate telomeric heterochromatin structure in yeast

At telomeric heterochromatin in yeast, the Sir protein complex spreads from Rap1 sites to silence adjacent genes. This cascade is believed to occur when Sir2, an NAD(+)-dependent enzyme, deacetylates histone H3 and H4 N termini, in particular histone H4 K16, enabling more Sir protein binding. Lysine 56 of histone H3 is located at the entry-exit points of the DNA superhelix surrounding the nucleosome, where it may control DNA compaction. We have found that K56 substitutions disrupt silencing severely without decreasing Sir protein binding at the telomere. Our in vitro and in vivo data indicate that Sir2 deacetylates K56 directly in telomeric heterochromatin to compact chromatin and prevent access to RNA polymerase and ectopic bacterial dam methylase. Since the spread of Sir proteins is necessary but not sufficient for silencing, we propose that silencing occurs when Sir2 deacetylates H3 K56 to close the nucleosomal entry-exit gates, enabling compaction of heterochromatin.     

RAG1-mediated ubiquitylation of histone H3 is required for chromosomal V(D)J recombination

RAG1 and RAG2 proteins are key components in V(D)J recombination. The core region of RAG1 is capable of catalyzing the recombination reaction; however, the biological function of non-core RAG1 remains largely unknown. Here, we show that in a murine-model carrying the RAG1 ring-finger conserved cysteine residue mutation (C325Y), V(D)J recombination was abrogated at the cleavage step, and this effect was accompanied by decreased mono-ubiquitylation of histone H3. Further analyses suggest that un-ubiquitylated histone H3 restrains RAG1 to the chromatin by interacting with the N-terminal 218 amino acids of RAG1. Our data provide evidence for a model in which ubiquitylation of histone H3 mediated by the ring-finger domain of RAG1 triggers the release of RAG1, thus allowing its transition into the cleavage phase. Collectively, our findings reveal that the non-core region of RAG1 facilitates chromosomal V(D)J recombination in a ubiquitylation-dependent pathway.     

Extraction of histones H2A,H3 and H4 from yeast nuclei: Measurement of the extent of yeast histone acetylation following one-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Yeast histones H2A, H3 and H4 were specifically extracted from purified nuclei using a 2% NaCl/75% ethanol solution. The extraction resulted in the complete removal of H2A, H3 and H4 from the nuclear pellet, as monitored by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the protein. The relative absence of nonhistone proteins from this histone subset simplifies the determination of the extent of histone modification in yeast. Levels of H4 acetylation were measured directly on Coomassie blue-stained Triton acid-urea gels and the levels verified by gel fluorography of the [³H]acetate-labeled histone.     

Recognition of multivalent histone states associated with heterochromatin by UHRF1 protein

Histone modifications and DNA methylation represent two layers of heritable epigenetic information that regulate eukaryotic chromatin structure and gene activity. UHRF1 is a unique factor that bridges these two layers; it is required for maintenance DNA methylation at hemimethylated CpG sites, which are specifically recognized through its SRA domain and also interacts with histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 9 (H3K9me3) in an unspecified manner. Here we show that UHRF1 contains a tandem Tudor domain (TTD) that recognizes H3 tail peptides with the heterochromatin-associated modification state of trimethylated lysine 9 and unmodified lysine 4 (H3K4me0/K9me3). Solution NMR and crystallographic data reveal the TTD simultaneously recognizes H3K9me3 through a conserved aromatic cage in the first Tudor subdomain and unmodified H3K4 within a groove between the tandem subdomains. The subdomains undergo a conformational adjustment upon peptide binding, distinct from previously reported mechanisms for dual histone mark recognition. Mutant UHRF1 protein deficient for H3K4me0/K9me3 binding shows altered localization to heterochromatic chromocenters and fails to reduce expression of a target gene, p16(INK4A), when overexpressed. Our results demonstrate a novel recognition mechanism for the combinatorial readout of histone modification states associated with gene silencing and add to the growing evidence for coordination of, and cross-talk between, the modification states of H3K4 and H3K9 in regulation of gene expression.     

H2B ubiquitylation: the end is in sight

Historically, the first eukaryotic protein found to be modified by ubiquitin was H2A, originally isolated from HeLa cells in 1975 by Harrison Busch and coworkers as a histone-like, nonhistone chromosomal protein called A24. Ubiquitylated histones have subsequently been found in many eukaryotic species, and to date, the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, the linker histone H1, and the histone variant H2A.Z are known to carry this modification. Although first on the scene, it was only recently that studies on histone ubiquitylation have enjoyed a renaissance. Part of the reason for the relatively slow pace of research on this fascinating histone modification was the absence of a good genetic system with which to study its cellular roles. This changed in 2000, when histone H2B was found to be ubiquitylated in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, an organism with a low histone gene copy number and highly tractable genetics. Another factor was the almost exclusive focus of research on the role of polyubiquitylation in protein turnover. Because histones are generally monoubiquitylated, a form of the modification that is not associated with protein degradation, the significance of this minimalist ubiquitin conjugation was not heavily pursued. But perhaps the key reason for the renewed interest in histone ubiquitylation was the unexpected discovery of the past year that ubiquitylated H2B plays an important role in the trans-histone methylation of histone H3, a modification with close ties to the regulation of gene expression. This review will highlight some of the recent findings on the regulation and cellular roles of H2B ubiquitylation in yeast.     

Isolation of yeast histone genes H2A and H2B

Analysis of cloned sequences for yeast histone genes H2A and H2B reveals that there are only two copies of this pair of genes within the haploid yeast genome. Within each copy, the genes for H2A and H2B are separated by approximately 700 bp of spacer DNA. The two copies are separated from one another in the yeast genome by a minimum distance of 35-60 kb. Sequence homology between the two copies is restricted to the genes for H2A and H2B; the spacer DNA between the genes is nonhomologous. In both copies, the genes for H2A and H2B are divergently transcribed. In addition, both plasmids code for other nonhistone proteins. Sequences coding for histones H3 and H4 have not been detected in the immediate vicinity of the genes for H2A and H2B.     

C2H2 zinc finger-SET histone methyltransferase is a plant-specific chromatin modifier

Histone modification represents a universal mechanism for regulation of eukaryotic gene expression underlying diverse biological processes from neuronal gene expression in mammals to control of flowering in plants. In animal cells, these chromatin modifications are effected by well-defined multiprotein complexes containing specific histone-modifying activities. In plants, information about the composition of such co-repressor complexes is just beginning to emerge. Here, we report that two Arabidopsis thaliana factors, a SWIRM domain polyamine oxidase protein, AtSWP1, and a plant-specific C2H2 zinc finger-SET domain protein, AtCZS, interact with each other in plant cells and repress expression of a negative regulator of flowering, FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) via an autonomous, vernalization-independent pathway. Loss-of-function of either AtSWP1 or AtCZS results in reduced dimethylation of lysine 9 and lysine 27 of histone H3 and hyperacetylation of histone H4 within the FLC locus, in elevated FLC mRNA levels, and in moderately delayed flowering. Thus, AtSWP1 and AtCZS represent two main components of a co-repressor complex that fine tunes flowering and is unique to plants.     

Regulation of histone H2A and H2B deubiquitination and Xenopus development by USP12 and USP46

Post-translational histone modifications play important roles in regulating gene expression programs, which in turn determine cell fate and lineage commitment during development. One such modification is histone ubiquitination, which primarily targets histone H2A and H2B. Although ubiquitination of H2A and H2B has been generally linked to gene silencing and gene activation, respectively, the functions of histone ubiquitination during eukaryote development are not well understood. Here, we identified USP12 and USP46 as histone H2A and H2B deubiquitinases that regulate Xenopus development. USP12 and USP46 prefer nucleosomal substrates and deubiquitinate both histone H2A and H2B in vitro and in vivo. WDR48, a WD40 repeat-containing protein, interacts with USP12 and USP46 and is required for the histone deubiquitination activity. Overexpression of either gene leads to gastrulation defects without affecting mesodermal cell fate, whereas knockdown of USP12 in Xenopus embryos results in reduction of a subset of mesodermal genes at gastrula stages. Immunohistochemical staining and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that USP12 regulates histone deubiquitination in the mesoderm and at specific gene promoters during Xenopus development. Taken together, this study identifies USP12 and USP46 as histone deubiquitinases for H2A and H2B and reveals that USP12 regulates Xenopus development during gastrula stages.     

Sir2 regulates histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast

Hypoacetylated histones are a hallmark of heterochromatin in organisms ranging from yeast to humans. Histone deacetylation is carried out by both NAD(+)-dependent and NAD(+)-independent enzymes. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, deacetylation of histones in heterochromatic chromosomal domains requires Sir2, a phylogenetically conserved NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, NAD(+)-independent histone deacetylases are required for the formation of heterochromatin, but the role of Sir2-like deacetylases in this process has not been evaluated. Here, we show that spSir2, the S. pombe Sir2-like protein that is the most closely related to the S. cerevisiae Sir2, is an NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase that efficiently deacetylates histone H3 lysine 9 (K9) and histone H4 lysine 16 (K16) in vitro. In sir2 Delta cells, silencing at the donor mating-type loci, telomeres, and the inner centromeric repeats (imr) is abolished, while silencing at the outer centromeric repeats (otr) and rDNA is weakly reduced. Furthermore, Sir2 is required for hypoacetylation and methylation of H3-K9 and for the association of Swi6 with the above loci in vivo. Our findings suggest that the NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase Sir2 plays an important and conserved role in heterochromatin assembly in eukaryotes.     

Self-interaction of heterochromatin protein 1 is required for direct binding to histone methyltransferase,SUV39H1

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) binds to the nucleosome via a methylated lysine residue 9 of histone H3 which is catalyzed by a histone methyltransferase such as SUV39H1. Although co-localization of HP1 and SUV39H1 has been evident in immunostaining and immunoprecipitation experiments, direct protein-protein interactions have remained to be characterized. We examined interactions between mouse HP1 alpha (mHP1 alpha) and SUV39H1 in yeast and in vitro. A yeast two-hybrid and a glutathione S-transferase pull-down study indicated that the chromo shadow domain of mHP1 alpha directly interacts with the N-terminal 39 amino acid stretch of SUV39H1. The IY165/168EE mutation in the chromo shadow domain of mHP1 alpha abrogated a self-interaction and this mutant did not interact with SUV39H1. The 13-mer peptide containing a consensus sequence for binding to the dimer surface formed by the chromo shadow domains inhibited interaction between mHP1 alpha and SUV39H1. It seems that self-interaction through the chromo shadow domain of HP1 is crucial for recruitment of SUV39H1 onto nucleosomes.