Inhibition of mutant BRAF splice variant signaling by next‐generation,selective RAF inhibitors

Vemurafenib and dabrafenib block MEK‐ERK1/2 signaling and cause tumor regression in the majority of advanced‐stage BRAF^V600E melanoma patients; however, acquired resistance and paradoxical signaling have driven efforts for more potent and selective RAF inhibitors. Next‐generation RAF inhibitors, such as PLX7904 (PB04), effectively inhibit RAF signaling in BRAF^V600E melanoma cells without paradoxical effects in wild‐type cells. Furthermore, PLX7904 blocks the growth of vemurafenib‐resistant BRAF^V600E cells that express mutant NRAS. Acquired resistance to vemurafenib and dabrafenib is also frequently driven by expression of mutation BRAF splice variants; thus, we tested the effects of PLX7904 and its clinical analog, PLX8394 (PB03), in BRAF^V600E splice variant‐mediated vemurafenib‐resistant cells. We show that paradox‐breaker RAF inhibitors potently block MEK‐ERK1/2 signaling, G1/S cell cycle events, survival and growth of vemurafenib/PLX4720‐resistant cells harboring distinct BRAF^V600E splice variants. These data support the further investigation of paradox‐breaker RAF inhibitors as a second‐line treatment option for patients failing on vemurafenib or dabrafenib.     

Receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer escape from BRAF inhibitors

The BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) induce anti-tumor responses in nearly 60% of patients with advanced ^V600BRAF-mutant melanomas but only 5% of patients with ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas. Earlier studies of how a subset of melanoma that initially responds to BRAFi but later acquires drug resistance pointed to the importance of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in drug escape. In a pair of recent reports, this RTK-mediated mechanism of acquired BRAFi resistance in melanoma is re-surfacing in the context of innate or primary BRAFi resistance in ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas, suggesting potential upfront therapeutic strategies to prevent BRAFi resistance.^V600BRAF mutations are found in >50% of melanomas, nearly 100% of hairy cell leukemias but smaller subsets of more common human malignancies (e.g., colorectal, thyroid)¹. The in-human “druggability” of mutant BRAF has been best demonstrated in metastatic BRAF mutant melanomas using the novel small-molecule BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) PLX4032/vemurafenib, producing survival benefits². Early clinical results of BRAFi in colorectal carcinoma, however, were disappointing, with only 5% of patients (1 of 21 patients) experiencing a partial response and 19% of patients (4 of 21 patients) experiencing minor responses³. This difference in the clinical results (melanoma vs. colorectal carcinoma) may relate less to their ontological origins but more to alternative states of a dynamic and plastic survival signaling network.The majority of BRAF mutant melanomas responds to BRAFi rapidly but acquires drug resistance within a median time of 6-7 months. The specific mechanisms of acquired BRAFi resistance are variegated but fall under two core pathways: 1) reactivation of RAF-MEK-ERK MAPK signaling, and 2) activation of MAPK-redundant signaling via the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-PI3K-AKT pathway, which is parallel but interconnected to the MAPK pathway. MAPK reactivation can occur via NRAS activating mutations⁴, COT overexpression⁵, ^V600BRAF alternative splicing⁶, ^V600BRAF amplification⁷, and MEK1 activating mutation^8,9. MAPK-redundant signaling via RTK overexpression has been shown to result in AKT activation and RAS-CRAF-MEK signaling, bypassing mutant BRAF^4,10,11. The repertoire of RTK overexpressed appears restricted but shares a common pattern of PDGFRβ and EGFR overexpression, at least in melanoma cell lines with acquired resistance to vemurafenib⁴. It is unclear at present how this overexpression of a select number of wild-type RTKs contributes to the molecular details of survival pathway redundancy and cooperativity. Nevertheless, understanding how melanomas acquire BRAFi resistance via core pathways may shed key insights into mechanisms of innate BRAFi resistance in multiple malignancies. Hence, it came as not a complete surprise that a pair of papers published recently implicated RTKs in innate BRAFi resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines^12,13. Both studies pointed to EGFR activation and downstream signaling as a key component to innate BRAFi resistance, at least in a majority of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines examined.Corcoran et al.¹² showed that BRAF mutant CRC cell lines, in contrast to BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, displayed innate resistance to growth inhibition by vemurafenib. An important clue implicating RTK involvement in innate vemurafenib resistance of BRAF mutant CRC cell lines came from the observation that p-ERK recovery occurred soon (hours to days) after vemurafenib treatment, unlike the kinetics of p-ERK recovery in BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines. This relatively rapid recovery of p-ERK post vemurafenib treatment in CRC cell lines is akin to that in melanoma cell lines with acquired BRAFi resistance driven by RTK overexpresion¹⁰. Corcoran et al. then traced this propensity for early p-ERK recovery to vemurafenib treatment (24 h)-dependent enhancement of (activated) RAS-GTP levels and MEK activity, parallel to elevated RAS-GTP levels in melanoma cell lines with RTK-driven, acquired BRAFi resistance⁴. In phospho-RTK arrays, they determined that the p-EGFR level (among others such as p-c-MET and p-IGF1R levels) was elevated in CRC cell lines relative to those in melanoma cells. Vemurafenib treatment (24 h) did not significantly enhance the p-EGFR level (but did elevate the p-IGFR1 level). Elevated p-EGFR levels in BRAF mutant CRC cell lines were correlated with elevated total EGFR levels (i.e., overexpressed compared with BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines). Thus, several observations correlated with innate BRAFi resistance in CRC cell lines: RTK (mostly consistently EGFR) overexpression (at baseline); upregulation of activation-associated phosphorylation of RTKs (at baseline); and upregulation of RAS-GTP levels (in response to BRAFi treatment). Curiously, although EGFR is highly phosphorylated at baseline, the RAS-GTP levels only rose in response to vemurafenib treatment.Corcoran et al. further showed that small-molecule EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) could downregulate, partially or completely, the RAS-GTP level induced by vemurafenib treatment. The combination of vemurafenib (BRAFi) and gefitnib (EGFRi) could synergistically reduce p-ERK levels and the net growth inhibition of most but not all CRC cell lines studied, suggesting that survival in some CRC cell lines may also depend on other RTKs and downstream signaling (e.g., AKT). Consistently, the combination of vemurafenib and erlotinib (EGFRi) stabilized the growth of, but did not cause significant regression of, CRC xenografts. Simultaneous inhibition or genetic knockdown of multiple RTKs was not explored, leaving unresolved the issue of how multiple RTKs may potentially play cooperative survival roles at baseline or in response to kinase inhibitor therapy.Prahallad et al.¹³ also compared CRC and melanoma cell lines and showed that EGFR expression is generally higher in CRC cell lines. Vemurafenib treatment (6 h) of the WiDr CRC cell line led to an induction in p-EGFR and p-AKT levels, concomitant with the expected suppression of p-MEK and p-ERK. MEK inhibition, by AZD6244 treatment, similarly led to the rebound phosphorylation of EGFR. Based on earlier literature showing that the ERK kinase phosphorylates Cdc25c, activating its phosphatase activity, and that Cdc25c can dephosphorylate EGFR, Prahallad et al. went on to show that Cdc25c knockdown mimicked vemurafenib treatment in inducing p-EGFR levels. As predicted, vemurafenib treatment of CRC cell line inhibited Cdc25c phosphorylation at a key threonine (Thr 48), which was previously demonstrated to be a key event for its phosphatase activity. Addition of an EGFRi (cetuximab or gefitnib) to the BRAFi vemurafenib treatment downregulated the baseline level of p-ERK and the BRAFi-induced p-AKT level (but not the baseline p-AKT level). Moreover, addition of an EGFRi sensitized CRC cell lines to growth inhibition by vemurafenib in vitro but did not induce tumor regression in vivo, again suggesting incomplete survival signaling blockade. Accordingly, it has been shown that the effect of vemurafenib in shrinking CRC tumor xenografts was enhanced by combining with an AKT inhibitor (MK-2206)¹⁴. Moreover, in this study, the addition of vemurafenib to erlotinib treatment also resulted in increased anti-tumor activity and improved survival in xenograft models. It should be pointed out that Prahallad et al. did not formally assess BRAFi and EGFRi synergy, nor did they examine the diversity of RTK overexpression/activity and its contribution to downstream survival signaling (e.g., AKT).These works, along with prior studies^4,10, highlight the importance of expression and activity level of RTKs as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines (Figure 1). An important question remains as to whether the diversity of RTK overexpression and/or upregulation participates in and contributes to the full BRAFi resistance phenotype. A recent study afforded us a systems-wide view of the RTKinome reprogramming in response to MEK inhibition in the so-called triple-negative breast cancer cell lines¹⁵. The balance of the MAPK vs. RTK network signaling may be dynamically influenced by kinase inhibitors targeting RAF or MEK. This daunting diversity of RTK expression/activity may corner us into abandoning a combination of RTK inhibitors (already approved for clinical usage) with a BRAF inhibitor. Instead, we might need to resort to downstream pathway inhibitors not yet approved for clinical usage (e.g., an inhibitor of MEK with an inhibitor of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1/2 axis) before we have a chance to corner BRAF mutant cancers into death.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase(s) (RTKs) as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines. (A) In BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, RTKs are generally expressed at very low levels and contribute minimally to survival signaling, resulting in a strong addiction to mutant BRAF signaling and sensitivity to BRAFi. When BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines acquire BRAFi resistance, they upregulate the expression and activity of PDGFRb and other RTKs, resulting in reactivation of MEK-ERK as well as MAPK-redundant PI3K-AKT survival signaling. (B) In BRAF mutant colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines, EGFR and other RTKs are upregulated by overexpression and some level of activation, resulting in MAPK-redundant survival signaling and conferring innate or primary BRAFi resistance. Treatment of CRC cell lines wth a BRAF or a MEK inhibitor can further activate EGFR and potentially other RTKs and stimulate GTP-RAS levels, consolidating innate BRAFi resistance. Red denotes mutated protein (e.g., BRAF); gray symbols denote weak signaling or interactions; multiplicity of protein symbols denotes overexpression; P in blue denotes activation-associated phosphorylation.     

SHOC2 and CRAF Mediate ERK1/2 Reactivation in Mutant NRAS-mediated Resistance to RAF Inhibitor

ERK1/2 signaling is frequently dysregulated in tumors through BRAF mutation. Targeting mutant BRAF with vemurafenib frequently elicits therapeutic responses; however, durable effects are often limited by ERK1/2 pathway reactivation via poorly defined mechanisms. We generated mutant BRAF^V600E melanoma cells that exhibit resistance to PLX4720, the tool compound for vemurafenib, that co-expressed mutant (Q61K) NRAS. In these BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K co-expressing cells, re-activation of the ERK1/2 pathway during PLX4720 treatment was dependent on NRAS. Expression of mutant NRAS in parental BRAF^V600 cells was sufficient to by-pass PLX4720 effects on ERK1/2 signaling, entry into S phase and susceptibility to apoptosis in a manner dependent on the RAF binding site in NRAS. ERK1/2 activation in BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K cells required CRAF only in the presence of PLX4720, indicating a switch in RAF isoform requirement. Both ERK1/2 activation and resistance to apoptosis of BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K cells in the presence of PLX4720 was modulated by SHOC-2/Sur-8 expression, a RAS-RAF scaffold protein. These data show that NRAS mutations confer resistance to RAF inhibitors in mutant BRAF cells and alter RAF isoform and scaffold molecule requirements to re-activate the ERK1/2 pathway.     

The BRAFV600E causes widespread alterations in gene methylation in the genome of melanoma cells

Although BRAF^V600E is well known to play an important role in the tumorigenesis of melanoma, its molecular mechanism, particularly the epigenetic aspect, has been incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the role of BRAF^V600E signaling in altering gene methylation in the genome of melanoma cells using a methylated CpG island amplification/CpG island microarray system and searched for genes coupled to the BRAF^V600Esignaling through methylation aberrations. The results indicated that a wide range of genes with broad functions were linked to BRAF^V600E signaling through their hyper- or hypomethylation. Expression of 59 genes hypermethylated upon BRAF knockdown was selectively tested and found to be largely correspondingly underexpressed, suggesting that these genes were naturally hypomethylated, and overexpressed with BRAF^V600E in melanoma. This BRAF^V600E-promoted hypomethylation was confirmed on genes selectively examined in primary melanoma tumors. Some of these genes were functionally tested and demonstrated to play a role in melanoma cell proliferation and invasion. As a mechanism of aberrant gene methylation driven by BRAF^V600E, expression of the DNA methyltransferase 1 and histone methyltransferase EZH2 was profoundly affected by BRAF^V600E. We have thus uncovered a previously unrecognized prominent epigenetic mechanism in the tumorigenesis of melanoma driven by BRAF^V600E. Many of the functionally important genes controlled by the BRAF^V600E signaling through aberrant methylation may prove to be novel therapeutic targets for melanoma.     

The BRAFV600E causes widespread alterations in gene methylation in the genome of melanoma cells

Although BRAF^V600E is well known to play an important role in the tumorigenesis of melanoma, its molecular mechanism, particularly the epigenetic aspect, has been incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the role of BRAF^V600E signaling in altering gene methylation in the genome of melanoma cells using a methylated CpG island amplification/CpG island microarray system and searched for genes coupled to the BRAF^V600E signaling through methylation aberrations. The results indicated that a wide range of genes with broad functions were linked to BRAF^V600E signaling through their hyper- or hypomethylation. Expression of 59 genes hypermethylated upon BRAF knockdown was selectively tested and found to be largely correspondingly underexpressed, suggesting that these genes were naturally hypomethylated and overexpressed with BRAF^V600E in melanoma. This BRAF^V600E-promoted hypomethylation was confirmed on genes selectively examined in primary melanoma tumors. Some of these genes were functionally tested and demonstrated to play a role in melanoma cell proliferation and invasion. As a mechanism of aberrant gene methylation driven by BRAF^V600E, expression of the DNA methyltransferase 1 and histone methyltransferase EZH2 was profoundly affected by BRAF^V600E. We have thus uncovered a previously unrecognized prominent epigenetic mechanism in the tumorigenesis of melanoma driven by BRAF^V600E. Many of the functionally important genes controlled by the BRAF^V600E signaling through aberrant methylation may prove to be novel therapeutic targets for melanoma.Key words: BRAF mutation, DNA methylation, melanoma, MAP kinase pathway, gene hypomethylation, gene hypermethylation     

Inhibition of both BRAF and MEK in BRAFV600E mutant melanoma restores compromised dendritic cell (DC) function while having differential direct effects on DC properties

Purpose

Dendritic cells (DCs) can induce strong tumor-specific T-cell immune responses. Constitutive upregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by a BRAF^V600 mutation, which is present in about 50 % of metastatic melanomas, may be linked to compromised function of DCs in the tumor microenvironment. Targeting both MEK and BRAF has shown efficacy in BRAF^V600 mutant melanoma.

Methods

We co-cultured monocyte-derived human DCs with melanoma cell lines pretreated with the MEK inhibitor U0126 or the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Cytokine production (IL-12 and TNF-α) and surface marker expression (CD80, CD83, and CD86) in DCs matured with the Toll-like receptor 3/Melanoma Differentiation-Associated protein 5 agonist polyI:C was examined. Additionally, DC function, viability, and T-cell priming capacity were assessed upon direct exposure to U0126 and vemurafenib.

Results

Cytokine production and co-stimulation marker expression were suppressed in polyI:C-matured DCs exposed to melanoma cells in co-cultures. This suppression was reversed by MAPK blockade with U0126 and/or vemurafenib only in melanoma cell lines carrying a BRAF^V600E mutation. Furthermore, when testing the effect of U0126 directly on DCs, marked inhibition of function, viability, and DC priming capacity was observed. In contrast, vemurafenib had no effect on DC function across a wide range of dose concentrations.

Conclusions

BRAF^V600E mutant melanoma cells modulate DC through the MAPK pathway as its blockade can reverse suppression of DC function. MEK inhibition negatively impacts DC function and viability if applied directly. In contrast, vemurafenib does not have detrimental effects on important functions of DCs and may therefore be a superior candidate for combination immunotherapy approaches in melanoma patients.     

Cotargeting histone deacetylases and oncogenic BRAF synergistically kills human melanoma cells by necrosis independently of RIPK1 and RIPK3

Past studies have shown that histone deacetylase (HDAC) and mutant BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) inhibitors synergistically kill melanoma cells with activating mutations in BRAF. However, the mechanism(s) involved remains less understood. Here, we report that combinations of HDAC and BRAF inhibitors kill BRAF^V600E melanoma cells by induction of necrosis. Cotreatment with the HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) or panobinostat (LBH589) and the BRAF inhibitor PLX4720 activated the caspase cascade, but caspases appeared dispensable for killing, in that inhibition of caspases did not invariably block induction of cell death. The majority of dying cells acquired propidium iodide positivity instantly when they became positive for Annexin V, suggesting induction of necrosis. This was supported by caspase-independent release of high-mobility group protein B1, and further consolidated by rupture of the plasma membrane and loss of nuclear and cytoplasmic contents, as manifested by transmission electron microscopic analysis. Of note, neither the necrosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 nor the small interference RNA (siRNA) knockdown of receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) inhibited cell death, suggesting that RIPK1 and RIPK3 do not contribute to induction of necrosis by combinations of HDAC and BRAF inhibitors in BRAF^V600E melanoma cells. Significantly, SAHA and the clinically available BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib cooperatively inhibited BRAF^V600E melanoma xenograft growth in a mouse model even when caspase-3 was inhibited. Taken together, these results indicate that cotreatment with HDAC and BRAF inhibitors can bypass canonical cell death pathways to kill melanoma cells, which may be of therapeutic advantage in the treatment of melanoma.     

Using BRAFV600E as a marker of autophagy dependence in pediatric brain tumors

Autophagy inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy in central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The BRAF^V600E mutation is known to affect autophagy. Our studies indicate CNS tumor cells with BRAF^V600E mutant cells (but not wild type) display high rates of induced autophagy, are sensitive to autophagy inhibition, and display synergy when chloroquine is combined with the RAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib or standard chemotherapeutics. Our studies also indicate chloroquine can improve vemurafenib sensitivity in intrinsically resistant cells and in a patient with induced-vemurafenib resistance. These findings suggest CNS tumors with BRAF^V600E are autophagy-dependent and that identification of BRAF^V600E may be a marker to identify pediatric patients with the best potential response to autophagy inhibition.     

Using BRAFV600E as a marker of autophagy dependence in pediatric brain tumors

Autophagy inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy in central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The BRAF^V600E mutation is known to affect autophagy. Our studies indicate CNS tumor cells with BRAF^V600E mutant cells (but not wild type) display high rates of induced autophagy, are sensitive to autophagy inhibition, and display synergy when chloroquine is combined with the RAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib or standard chemotherapeutics. Our studies also indicate chloroquine can improve vemurafenib sensitivity in intrinsically resistant cells and in a patient with induced-vemurafenib resistance. These findings suggest CNS tumors with BRAF^V600E are autophagy-dependent and that identification of BRAF^V600E may be a marker to identify pediatric patients with the best potential response to autophagy inhibition.     

MicroRNA‐125a promotes resistance to BRAF inhibitors through suppression of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway

Melanoma patients with BRAF^V600E‐mutant tumors display striking responses to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi); however, almost all invariably relapse with drug‐resistant disease. Here, we report that microRNA‐125a (miR‐125a) expression is upregulated in human melanoma cells and patient tissues upon acquisition of BRAFi resistance. We show that miR‐125a induction confers resistance to BRAF^V600E melanoma cells to BRAFi by directly suppressing pro‐apoptotic components of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, including BAK1 and MLK3. Apoptotic suppression and prolonged survival favor reactivation of the MAPK and AKT pathways by drug‐resistant melanoma cells. We demonstrate that miR‐125a inhibition suppresses the emergence of resistance to BRAFi and, in a subset of resistant melanoma cell lines, leads to partial drug resensitization. Finally, we show that miR‐125a upregulation is mediated by TGFβ signaling. In conclusion, the identification of this novel role for miR‐125a in BRAFi resistance exposes clinically relevant mechanisms of melanoma cell survival that can be exploited therapeutically.     

The BRAFV600E inhibitor,PLX4032, increases type I collagen synthesis in melanoma cells

Vertical growth phase (VGP) melanoma is frequently metastatic, a process mediated by changes in gene expression, which are directed by signal transduction pathways in the tumor cells. A prominent signaling pathway is the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk MAPK pathway, which increases expression of genes that promote melanoma progression. Many melanomas harbor a mutation in this pathway, BRAF^V600E, which constitutively activates MAPK signaling and expression of downstream target genes that facilitate tumor progression. In BRAF^V600E melanoma, the small molecule inhibitor, vemurafenib (PLX4032), has revolutionized therapy for melanoma by inducing rapid tumor regression. This compound down-regulates the expression of many genes. However, in this study, we document that blocking the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk MAPK pathway, either with an ERK (PLX4032) or a MEK (U1026) signaling inhibitor, in BRAF^V600E human and murine melanoma cell lines increases collagen synthesis in vitro and collagen deposition in vivo. Since TGFß signaling is a major mediator of collagen synthesis, we examined whether blocking TGFß signaling with a small molecule inhibitor would block this increase in collagen. However, there was minimal reduction in collagen synthesis in response to blocking TGFß signaling, suggesting additional mechanism(s), which may include activation of the p38 MAPK pathway. Presently, it is unclear whether this increased collagen synthesis and deposition in melanomas represent a therapeutic benefit or an unwanted “off target” effect of inhibiting the Ras-Raf-Erk-Mek pathway.     

NVP-LDE225, a Potent and Selective SMOOTHENED Antagonist Reduces Melanoma Growth In Vitro and In Vivo

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive cancers and its incidence is increasing worldwide. So far there are no curable therapies especially after metastasis. Due to frequent mutations in members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, this pathway is constitutively active in melanoma. It has been shown that the SONIC HEDGEHOG (SHH)-GLI and MAPK signaling pathway regulate cell growth in many tumors including melanoma and interact with each other in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival.Here we show that the SHH-GLI pathway is active in human melanoma cell lines as they express downstream target of this pathway GLI1. Expression of GLI1 was significantly higher in human primary melanoma tissues harboring BRAF^V600E mutation than those with wild type BRAF. Pharmacologic inhibition of BRAF^V600E in human melanoma cell lines resulted in decreased expression of GLI1 thus demonstrating interaction of SHH-GLI and MAPK pathways. Inhibition of SHH-GLI pathway by the novel small molecule inhibitor of smoothened NVP-LDE225 was followed by inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in human melanoma cell lines, interestingly with both BRAF^V600E and BRAF^{Wild Type} status. NVP-LDE225 was potent in reducing cell proliferation and inducing tumor growth arrest in vitro and in vivo, respectively and these effects were superior to the natural compound cyclopamine.Finally, we conclude that inhibition of SHH-GLI signaling pathway in human melanoma by the specific smoothened inhibitor NVP-LDE225 could have potential therapeutic application in human melanoma even in the absence of BRAF^V600E mutation and warrants further investigations.     

Design,synthesis, and biological evaluation of pyrazole derivatives containing acetamide bond as potential BRAFV600E inhibitors

With the increasingly acquired resistance, relapse and side effects of known marketed BRAF^V600E inhibitors, it’s significant to design the more effective and novel drugs. In this study, a series of novel pyrazole derivatives containing acetamide bond had been designed and synthesized on the basis of analysis of the endogenous ligands extracted from the known B-Raf co-crystals in the PDB database. Then, the compounds were evaluated for biological activities as potential BRAF^V600E inhibitors. The bioassay results in vitro against three human tumor cell lines revealed that some of the compounds showed very impressed antiproliferative property. Among them, the compound 5r with IC₅₀ values of 0.10?±?0.01?μM against BRAF^V600E and 0.96?±?0.10?μM against A375 cell line, showed the most potent inhibitory effect, compared with the positive-controlled agents vemurafenib (IC₅₀?=?0.04?±?0.004?μM for BRAF^V600E, IC₅₀?=?1.05?±?0.10?μM against A375). Further investigation confirmed that the compound 5r could induce A375 cell apoptosis, induce A375 cell death through changing mitochondrial membrane potential, and result in A375 cell arrest at the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Docking simulations results indicated that the compound 5r could bind tightly at the BRAF^V600E active site. Meanwhile, 3D-QSAR model suggested that these compounds may be potential anticancer inhibitors. Overall, the article provided some new molecular scaffolds for the further BRAF^V600E inhibitors.     

Recurrent BRAF kinase fusions in melanocytic tumors offer an opportunity for targeted therapy

BRAF is the most prevalent oncogene and an important therapeutic target in melanoma. In some cancers, BRAF is activated by rearrangements that fuse its kinase domain to 5′ partner genes. We examined 848 comparative genomic hybridization profiles of melanocytic tumors and found copy number transitions within BRAF in 10 tumors, of which six could be further characterized by sequencing. In all, the BRAF kinase domain was fused in‐frame to six N‐terminal partners. No other mutations were identified in melanoma oncogenes. One of the seven melanoma cell lines without known oncogenic mutations harbored a similar BRAF fusion, which constitutively activated the MAP kinase pathway. Sorafenib, but not vemurafenib, could block MAP kinase pathway activation and proliferation of the cell line at clinically relevant concentrations, whereas BRAF^V600E mutant melanoma cell lines were significantly more sensitive to vemurafenib. The patient from whom the cell line was derived showed a durable clinical response to sorafenib.     

Role of VEGFR‐1 in melanoma acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib

The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐1 (VEGFR‐1) is a tyrosine kinase receptor frequently expressed in melanoma. Its activation by VEGF‐A or placental growth factor (PlGF) promotes tumour cell survival, migration and invasiveness. Moreover, VEGFR‐1 stimulation contributes to pathological angiogenesis and induces recruitment of tumour‐associated macrophages. Since melanoma acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) has been associated with activation of pro‐angiogenic pathways, we have investigated VEGFR‐1 involvement in vemurafenib resistance. Results indicate that human melanoma cells rendered resistant to vemurafenib secrete greater amounts of VEGF‐A and express higher VEGFR‐1 levels compared with their BRAFi‐sensitive counterparts. Transient VEGFR‐1 silencing in susceptible melanoma cells delays resistance development, whereas in resistant cells it increases sensitivity to the BRAFi. Consistently, enforced VEGFR‐1 expression, by stable gene transfection in receptor‐negative melanoma cells, markedly reduces sensitivity to vemurafenib. Moreover, melanoma cells expressing VEGFR‐1 are more invasive than VEGFR‐1 deficient cells and receptor blockade by a specific monoclonal antibody (D16F7 mAb) reduces extracellular matrix invasion triggered by VEGF‐A and PlGF. These data suggest that VEGFR‐1 up‐regulation might contribute to melanoma progression and spreading after acquisition of a drug‐resistant phenotype. Thus, VEGFR‐1 inhibition with D16F7 mAb might be a suitable adjunct therapy for VEGFR‐1 positive tumours with acquired resistance to vemurafenib.     

Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Hyperactivation and Enhanced NRAS Expression Drive Acquired Vemurafenib Resistance in V600E BRAF Melanoma Cells

Although targeting the V600E activating mutation in the BRAF gene, the most common genetic abnormality in melanoma, has shown clinical efficacy in melanoma patients, response is, invariably, short lived. To better understand mechanisms underlying this acquisition of resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in previously responsive melanomas, we induced vemurafenib resistance in two V600E BRAF+ve melanoma cell lines, A375 and DM443, by serial in vitro vemurafenib exposure. The resulting approximately 10-fold more vemurafenib-resistant cell lines, A375rVem and D443rVem, had higher growth rates and showed differential collateral resistance to cisplatin, melphalan, and temozolomide. The acquisition of vemurafenib resistance was associated with significantly increased NRAS levels in A375rVem and D443rVem, increased activation of the prosurvival protein, AKT, and the MAPKs, ERK, JNK, and P38, which correlated with decreased levels of the MAPK inhibitor protein, GSTP1. Despite the increased NRAS, whole exome sequencing showed no NRAS gene mutations. Inhibition of all three MAPKs and siRNA-mediated NRAS suppression both reversed vemurafenib resistance significantly in A375rVem and DM443rVem. Together, the results indicate a mechanism of acquired vemurafenib resistance in V600E BRAF+ve melanoma cells that involves increased activation of all three human MAPKs and the PI3K pathway, as well as increased NRAS expression, which, contrary to previous reports, was not associated with mutations in the NRAS gene. The data highlight the complexity of the acquired vemurafenib resistance phenotype and the challenge of optimizing BRAF-targeted therapy in this disease. They also suggest that targeting the MAPKs and/or NRAS may provide a strategy to mitigate such resistance in V600E BRAF+ve melanoma.     

Differential Inhibition of Ex-Vivo Tumor Kinase Activity by Vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

Background

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma patients harboring BRAF(V600E) has improved drastically after the discovery of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib. However, drug resistance is a recurring problem, and prognoses are still very bad for patients harboring BRAF wild-type. Better markers for targeted therapy are therefore urgently needed.

Methodology

In this study, we assessed the individual kinase activity profiles in 26 tumor samples obtained from patients with metastatic malignant melanoma using peptide arrays with 144 kinase substrates. In addition, we studied the overall ex-vivo inhibitory effects of vemurafenib and sunitinib on kinase activity status.

Results

Overall kinase activity was significantly higher in lysates from melanoma tumors compared to normal skin tissue. Furthermore, ex-vivo incubation with both vemurafenib and sunitinib caused significant decrease in phosphorylation of kinase substrates, i.e kinase activity. While basal phosphorylation profiles were similar in BRAF wild-type and BRAF(V600E) tumors, analysis with ex-vivo vemurafenib treatment identified a subset of 40 kinase substrates showing stronger inhibition in BRAF(V600E) tumor lysates, distinguishing the BRAF wild-type and BRAF(V600E) tumors. Interestingly, a few BRAF wild-type tumors showed inhibition profiles similar to BRAF(V600E) tumors. The kinase inhibitory effect of vemurafenib was subsequently analyzed in cell lines harboring different BRAF mutational status with various vemurafenib sensitivity in-vitro.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that multiplex kinase substrate array analysis give valuable information about overall tumor kinase activity. Furthermore, intra-assay exposure to kinase inhibiting drugs may provide a useful tool to study mechanisms of resistance, as well as to identify predictive markers.     

Loss of PI(4,5)P2 5-Phosphatase A Contributes to Resistance of Human Melanoma Cells to RAF/MEK Inhibitors

Past studies have shown that the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase (PIB5PA), is commonly downregulated or lost in melanomas, which contributes to elevated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt in melanoma cells. In this report, we provide evidence that PIB5PA deficiency plays a role in resistance of melanoma cells to RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Ectopic expression of PIB5PA enhanced apoptosis induced by the RAF inhibitor PLX4720 in BRAF^V600E and by the MEK inhibitor U0126 in both BRAF^V600E and wild-type BRAF melanoma cells. This was due to inhibition of PI3K/Akt, as co-introduction of an active form of Akt (myr-Akt) abolished the effect of overexpression of PIB5PA on apoptosis induced by PLX4720 or U0126. While overexpression of PIB5PA triggered activation of Bad and down-regulation of Mcl-1, knockdown of Bad or overexpression of Mcl-1 recapitulated, at least in part, the effect of myr-Akt, suggesting that regulation of Bad and Mcl-1 is involved in PIB5PA-mediated sensitization of melanoma cells to the inhibitors. The role of PIB5PA deficiency in BRAF inhibitor resistance was confirmed by knockdown of PIB5PA, which led to increased growth of BRAF^V600E melanoma cells selected for resistance to PLX4720. Consistent with its role in vitro, overexpression of PIB5PA and the MEK inhibitor selumetinib cooperatively inhibited melanoma tumor growth in a xenograft model. Taken together, these results identify loss of PIB5PA as a novel resistance mechanism of melanoma to RAF/MEK inhibitors and suggest that restoration of PIB5PA may be a useful strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of the inhibitors in the treatment of melanoma.