Cranial neural crest cell migration in cockatiel Nymphicus hollandicus (Aves: Psittaciformes)

Parrots have developed unique jaw muscles in their evolutionary history. The M. pseudomasseter, which completely covers the lateral side of the jugal bar, is regarded as a jaw muscle unique to parrots. In a previous study, I presented a hypothesis on the relevance of modifications in the regulation of cranial neural crest cell (NCC) development to the generation of this novel jaw muscle based on histological analyses (Tokita [2004] J Morphol 259:69-81). In the present study, I investigated distribution and migration patterns of cranial neural crest cells (NCCs) through parrot embryogenesis with immunohistochemical techniques to further understand the role of cranial NCCs in the evolution of the M. pseudomasseter, and to provide new information on the relative plasticity in cranial NCC migration at early stages of avian development. The basic nature of cranial NCC development was mostly conserved between chick and parrot. In both, cranial NCCs migrated from the dorsal tip of the neural tube in a ventral direction. Three major populations were identified in their cranial NCCs. Migration pathways of these cells were almost identical between chick and parrot. The principal difference was seen in the relative timing of cranial NCC migration. In the parrot, cranial NCC migration into the first pharyngeal arch was more advanced than in the chick at early stages of development. Such a temporal shift in cranial NCC migration might influence architectural patterning of parrot jaw muscles that generates new muscle like M. pseudomasseter.     

Development of craniofacial musculature in Monodelphis domestica (marsupialia,didelphidae)

Development of craniofacial muscles of Monodelphis domestica (Marsupialia, Didelphidae) is described. In a period of 4–6 days all craniofacial muscles in M. domestica progress from myoblast condensation, to striated myofibers that are aligned in the direction of adult muscles and possess multiple, lateral nuclei. This process begins 1 to 2 days before birth and continues during the first few days after birth. Compared to other aspects of cranial development, muscle development in M. domestica is rapid. This rapid and more or less simultaneous emergence of craniofacial muscles differs from the previously described pattern of development of the cranial skeleton in marsupials, which displays a mosaic of acceleration and deceleration of regions and individual elements. Unlike the skeletal system, craniofacial muscles show no evidence of regional specialization during development. M. domestica resembles eutherian mammals in the relatively rapid and more or less simultaneous differentiation of all craniofacial muscles. It differs from eutherian taxa in that most stages of myogenesis occur postnatally, following the onset of function. The timing of the development of muscular and skeletal structures is compared and it is concluded that the relatively early development of muscle is not reflected by any particular acceleration of the differentiation or growth of skeletal structures. Finally, the difficulties in accounting for complex internal arrangements of muscles such as the tongue, given current models of myogenesis are summarized. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Patterns of spatial and temporal visceral arch muscle development in the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum)

Vertebrate head development is a classical topic that has received renewed attention during the last decade. Most reports use one of a few model organisms (chicken, mouse, zebrafish) and have focused on molecular mechanisms and the role of the neural crest, while cranial muscle development has received less attention. Here we describe cranial muscle differentiation and morphogenesis in the Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. To determine the onset of differentiation we use antibodies against desmin and optical sectioning using confocal laser scanning microscopy on whole-mount immunostained embryos. This technique makes it possible to document the cranial muscle in three dimensions while keeping the specimens intact. Desmin expression starts almost simultaneously in the first, second, and third visceral arch muscles (as in other amphibians studied). Muscle anlagen divide up early into the different elements which constitute the larval cranial musculature. We extend and refine earlier findings, e.g., by documenting a clear division between interhyoideus and interhyoideus posterior. The timing of cranial muscle differentiation differs among vertebrate groups, but seems to be constant within each group. This study provides a morphological foundation for further studies of muscle cell fate and early differentiation.     

Muscle development in the Japanese flounder,Paralichthys olivaceus,with special reference to some of the larval‐specific muscles

We investigated muscle development in the Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus, focusing primarily on the cranial muscles, using a whole mount immunohistochemical staining method. It is well established that during the very early stages of morphogenesis, until 4 days post hatching (dph), muscles required for feeding develop. Later, between 8 and 16 dph, the muscle composition in the dorsal branchial arches changes to the adult form. We discovered the presence of larval‐specific muscles in this ontogenetic period, termed the larval branchial levators 2 and 3, located in the dorsal branchial arches. The larval branchial levators 2 and 3 disappear during the course of development, whereas the others remain as levator internus 1 and levator posterior, which have also been described in adult fish. In place of these regressed muscles, the levatores externi and levator internus 2 develop and regulate the branchial arches. In addition, we found that the levator posterior, which is thought to represent the fifth levator externus, and the levatores externi exhibit different origins. We also found that at least a part of the caudal fin musculature develops from the trunk myotome. J. Morphol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Edgeworth's legacy of cranial muscle development with an analysis of muscles in the ventral gill arch region of batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea).

A series of studies by Edgeworth demonstrated that cranial muscles of gnathostome fishes are embryologically of somitic origin, originating from the mandibular, hyoid, branchial, epibranchial, and hypobranchial muscle plates. Recent experimental studies using quail-chick chimeras support Edgeworth's view on the developmental origin of cranial muscles. One of his findings, the existence of the premyogenic condensation constrictor dorsalis in teleost fishes, has also been confirmed by molecular developmental studies. Therefore, developmental mechanisms for patterning of cranial muscles, as described and implicated by Edgeworth, may serve as structural entities or regulatory phenomena responsible for developmental and evolutionary changes. With Edgeworth's and other studies as background, muscles in the ventral gill arch region of batoid fishes are analyzed and compared with those of other gnathostome fishes. The spiracularis is regarded as homologous at least within batoid fishes, but its status within elasmobranchs remains unclear; developmental modifications of the spiracularis proper are evident in some batoid fishes and in several shark groups. The peculiar ventral extension of the spiracularis in electric rays and some stingrays may represent convergence, probably facilitating ventilation and/or feeding in both groups. The evolutionary origin of the "internus" and "externus" remains uncertain, despite the fact that a variety of forms of the constrictor superficiales ventrales in batoid fishes indicates an actual medio-ventral extension of the "externus." The intermandibularis is probably present only in electric rays. The "X" muscle occurs only in electric rays and is considered to be Edgeworth's intermandibularis profundus. Its association with the adductor mandibular complex in narkinidid and narcinidid electric rays may relate to its functional role in lower jaw movement. Contrary to common belief, in most batoid fishes as well as some sharks, muscles that originate from the branchial muscle plate and extend medially in the ventral gill arches do exist: the medial extension of the interbranchiales in most batoid fishes and some sharks and the "Y" muscle in the pelagic stingrays Myliobatos and Rhinoptera. The latter is another example of the medial extension of the "internus." Whether the interbranchiales and "Y" muscle are homologous within elasmobranchs and whether homologous with the obliques ventrales and/or transversi ventrales of osteichthyan fishes await further research. Four hypobranchial muscles are recognized in batoid fishes: the coracomandibularis, coracohyoideus, coracoarcualis, and coracohyomandibularis. The coracohyoideus is discrete from the coracoarcualis; its complete structural separation from the latter occurs in several groups of batoid fishes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Skeletal development in Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae).

Postembryonic skeletal development of the pipid frog Xenopus laevis is described from cleared-and-stained whole-mount specimens and sectioned material representing Nieuwkoop and Faber developmental Stages 46-65, plus postmetamorphic individuals up to 6 months old. An assessment of variation of skeletogenesis within a single population of larvae and comparison with earlier studies revealed that the timing, but not the sequence, of skeletal development in X. laevis is more variable than previously reported and poorly correlated with the development of external morphology. Examination of chondrocranial development indicates that the rostral cartilages of X. laevis are homologous with the suprarostral cartilages of non-pipoid anurans, and suggests that the peculiar chondrocranium of this taxon is derived from a more generalized pattern typical of non-pipoid frogs. Derived features of skeletal development not previously reported for X. laevis include 1) bipartite formation of the palatoquadrate; 2) precocious formation of the adult mandible; 3) origin of the angulosplenial from two centers of ossification; 4) complete erosion of the orbital cartilage during the later stages of metamorphosis; 5) development of the sphenethmoid as a membrane, rather than an endochondral bone; and 6) a pattern of timing of ossification that more closely coincides with that of the pelobatid frog Spea than that recorded for neobatrachian species.     

Relationship between Neural Crest Cells and Cranial Mesoderm during Head Muscle Development

Background

In vertebrates, the skeletal elements of the jaw, together with the connective tissues and tendons, originate from neural crest cells, while the associated muscles derive mainly from cranial mesoderm. Previous studies have shown that neural crest cells migrate in close association with cranial mesoderm and then circumscribe but do not penetrate the core of muscle precursor cells of the branchial arches at early stages of development, thus defining a sharp boundary between neural crest cells and mesodermal muscle progenitor cells. Tendons constitute one of the neural crest derivatives likely to interact with muscle formation. However, head tendon formation has not been studied, nor have tendon and muscle interactions in the head.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Reinvestigation of the relationship between cranial neural crest cells and muscle precursor cells during development of the first branchial arch, using quail/chick chimeras and molecular markers revealed several novel features concerning the interface between neural crest cells and mesoderm. We observed that neural crest cells migrate into the cephalic mesoderm containing myogenic precursor cells, leading to the presence of neural crest cells inside the mesodermal core of the first branchial arch. We have also established that all the forming tendons associated with branchiomeric and eye muscles are of neural crest origin and express the Scleraxis marker in chick and mouse embryos. Moreover, analysis of Scleraxis expression in the absence of branchiomeric muscles in Tbx1^−/− mutant mice, showed that muscles are not necessary for the initiation of tendon formation but are required for further tendon development.

Conclusions/Significance

This results show that neural crest cells and muscle progenitor cells are more extensively mixed than previously believed during arch development. In addition, our results show that interactions between muscles and tendons during craniofacial development are similar to those observed in the limb, despite the distinct embryological origin of these cell types in the head.     

Diversity in cranial muscles: Origins and developmental programs

Cranial muscles have been the focus of many studies over the years because of their unique developmental programs and relative resistance to illnesses. In addition, head muscles possess clonal relationships with heart muscles and have been highly remodeled during vertebrate evolution. Here, we provide an overview of recent findings that have helped to redefine the boundaries and lineages of cranial mesoderm. These studies have important implications regarding the emergence of muscle connective tissues, which can share a common origin with skeletal muscle. We also highlight new regulatory networks of various muscle subgroups, particularly those derived from the most caudal arches, which remain poorly defined. Finally, we suggest future research avenues to characterize the nature of their intrinsic specificities and their emergence during evolution.     

扬子鳄胚胎发育分期

本文基于150例不同胎龄的扬子鳄胚胎,将扬子鳄胚胎发育过程分成28个时期。早期胚胎主要以外部形态如体节、体曲程度、脑泡、感觉器官、附肢、鳃弓、颜面部突起、心脏、皮肤等作为分期标准;晚期胚胎主要以器官发育的组织学指标为分期依据。发现在前20个时期中,每个时期的胎龄与密河鳄的很一致,后8个时期的胎龄与密河鳄有差异。分析认为,鳄类晚期胚胎的分期依据应增加器官发育的组织学指标,以便使不同鳄类的胚胎发育有一致的分期标准,为鳄类发育生物学后续研究提供基础资料。     

Cephalic muscle development in the Australian lungfish,Neoceratodus forsteri

Lungfishes are the extant sister group of tetrapods. As such, they are important for the study of evolutionary processes involved in the water to land transition of vertebrates. The evolution of a true neck, that is, the complete separation of the pectoral girdle from the cranium, is one of the most intriguing morphological transitions known among vertebrates. Other salient changes involve new adaptations for terrestrial feeding, which involves both the cranium and its associated musculature. Historically, the cranium has been extensively investigated, but the development of the cranial muscles much less so. Here, we present a detailed study of cephalic muscle development in the Australian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri, which is considered to be the sister taxon to all other extant lungfishes. Neoceratodus shows several developmental patterns previously described in other taxa; the tendency of muscles to develop from anterior to posterior, from their region of origin toward insertion, and from lateral to ventral/medial (outside‐in), at least in the branchial arches. The m.protractor pectoralis appears to develop as an extension of the most posterior m.levatores arcuum branchialium, supporting the hypothesis that the m.cucullaris and its derivatives (protractor pectoralis, levatores arcuum branchialium) are branchial muscles. We present a new hypothesis regarding the homology of the ventral branchial arch muscles (subarcualis recti and obliqui, transversi ventrales) in lungfishes and amphibians. Moreover, the morphology and development of the cephalic muscles confirms that extant lungfishes are neotenic and have been strongly influenced via paedomorphosis during their evolutionary history.     

Neural tube derived signals and Fgf8 act antagonistically to specify eye versus mandibular arch muscles

Recent knockout experiments in the mouse generated amazing craniofacial skeletal muscle phenotypes. Yet none of the genes could be placed into a molecular network, because the programme to control the development of muscles in the head is not known. Here we show that antagonistic signals from the neural tube and the branchial arches specify extraocular versus branchiomeric muscles. Moreover, we identified Fgf8 as the branchial arch derived signal. However, this molecule has an additional function in supporting the proliferative state of myoblasts, suppressing their differentiation, while a further branchial arch derived signal, namely Bmp7, is an overall negative regulator of head myogenesis.     

Cranial neural crest cells contribute to connective tissue in cranial muscles in the anuran amphibian, Bombina orientalis.

The contribution of cranial neural crest cells to the development and patterning of cranial muscles in amphibians was investigated in the phylogenetically basal and morphologically generalized frog, Bombina orientalis. Experimental methods included fluorescent marking of premigratory cranial neural crest and extirpation of individual migratory streams. Neural crest cells contributed to the connective tissue component, but not the myofibers, of many larval muscles within the first two branchial arches (mandibular and hyoid), and complex changes in muscle patterning followed neural crest extirpation. Connective tissue components of individual muscles of either arch originate from the particular crest migratory stream that is associated with that arch, and this relationship is maintained regardless of the segmental identity-or embryonic derivation-of associated skeletal components. These developmental relations define a pattern of segmentation in the head of larval anurans that is similar to that previously described in the domestic chicken, the only vertebrate that has been thoroughly investigated in this respect. The fundamental role of the neural crest in patterning skeleton and musculature may represent a primitive feature of cranial development in vertebrates. Moreover, the corresponding developmental processes and cell fates appear to be conserved even when major evolutionary innovations-such as the novel cartilages and muscles of anuran larvae-result in major differences in cranial form.     

Xenopus gamma-crystallin gene expression: evidence that the gamma-crystallin gene family is transcribed in lens and nonlens tissues.

Crystallins, the major gene products of the lens, accumulate to high levels during the differentiation of the vertebrate lens. Although crystallins were traditionally thought to be lens specific, it has recently been shown that some are also expressed at very low levels in nonlens tissues. We have examined the embryonic expression pattern of gamma-crystallins, the most abundant crystallins of the embryonic lens in Xenopus laevis. The expression profile of five Xenopus gamma-crystallin genes mirrors the pattern of lens differentiation in X. laevis, exhibiting on average a 100-fold increase between tailbud and tadpole stages. Four of these genes are also ubiquitously expressed outside the lens at a very low level, the first demonstration of nonlens expression of any gamma-crystallin gene; expression of the remaining gene was not detected outside the head region, thus suggesting that there may be two classes of gamma-crystallin genes in X. laevis. Predictions regarding control mechanisms responsible for this dual mode of expression are discussed. This study raises the question of whether any crystallin, on stringent examination, will be found exclusively in the lens.     

Development of mandibular,hyoid and hypobranchial muscles in the zebrafish: homologies and evolution of these muscles within bony fishes and tetrapods

Background  

During vertebrate head evolution, muscle changes accompanied radical modification of the skeleton. Recent studies have suggested that muscles and their innervation evolve less rapidly than cartilage. The freshwater teleostean zebrafish (Danio rerio) is the most studied actinopterygian model organism, and is sometimes taken to represent osteichthyans as a whole, which include bony fishes and tetrapods. Most work concerning zebrafish cranial muscles has focused on larval stages. We set out to describe the later development of zebrafish head muscles and compare muscle homologies across the Osteichthyes.