Receptor subtype-specific docking of Asp6.59 with C-terminal arginine residues in Y receptor ligands

Y receptors (YRs) are G protein-coupled receptors whose Y(1)R, Y(2)R, and Y(5)R subtypes preferentially bind neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY, whereas mammalian Y(4)Rs show a higher affinity for pancreatic polypeptide (PP). Comparison of YR orthologs and paralogs revealed Asp(6.59) to be fully conserved throughout all of the YRs reported so far. By replacing this conserved aspartic acid residue with alanine, asparagine, glutamate, and arginine, we now show that this residue plays a crucial role in binding and signal transduction of NPY/PP at all YRs. Sensitivity to distinct replacements is, however, receptor subtype-specific. Next, we performed a complementary mutagenesis approach to identify the contact site of the ligand. Surprisingly, this conserved residue interacts with two different ligand arginine residues by ionic interactions; although in Y(2)R and Y(5)R, Arg(33) is the binding partner of Asp(6.59), in Y(1)R and Y(4)R, Arg(35) of human PP and NPY interacts with Asp(6.59). Furthermore, Arg(25) of PP and NPY is involved in ligand binding only at Y(2)R and Y(5)R. This suggests significant differences in the docking of YR ligands between Y(1/4)R and Y(2/5)R and provides new insights into the molecular binding mode of peptide agonists at GPCRs. Furthermore, the proposed model of a subtype-specific binding mode is in agreement with the evolution of YRs.     

Functional reconstitution of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(2) and Y(4) receptors in Sf9 insect cells

The four functionally expressed human neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes (hY(1)R, hY(2)R, hY(4)R, hY(5)R) belong to class A of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and interact with pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o)-proteins. The number of small molecules described as ligands for hY(1)R and hY(5)R exceeds by far those for hY(2)R. Potent non-peptidergic ligands for the hY(4)R are not available so far. Here, we report on the functional reconstitution of the hY(2)R and the hY(4)R in Sf9 insect cells using the baculovirus system. Sf9 cells were genetically engineered by infection with up to four different baculoviruses, combining the receptors with G-proteins of the G(i/o) family and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins to improve signal-to-noise ratio. In steady-state GTPase assays, using pNPY (Y(2)) and hPP (Y(4)), the GPCRs coupled to various G(i)/G(o)-proteins and both, RGS4 and GAIP, enhanced the signals. Co-expression systems hY(2)R + G?(i2) and hY(4)R + G?(i2)/G?(o) + RGS4, combined with G?(1)?(2), yielded best signal-to-noise ratios. hY(2)R function was validated using both agonistic peptides (NPY, PYY, NPY(13?36)) and selective non-peptidergic antagonists (BIIE0246 and derivatives), whereas the hY(4)R model was characterized with peptidergic agonists (PP, NPY, GW1229, and BW1911U90). Tunicamycin inhibited receptor N-glycosylation diminished NPY signals at hY(2)R and abolished hY(4)R function. Investigations with monovalent salts showed sensitivity of hY(4)R toward Na(+), revealing moderate constitutive activity. After validation, an acylguanidine (UR-PI284) was identified as a weak non-peptide Y(4)R antagonist. In summary, the established steady-state GTPase assays provide sensitive test systems for the characterization of Y(2) and Y(4) receptor ligands.     

Molecular dynamics of NPY Y1 receptor activation

A three-dimensional model of the human neuropeptide Y(NPY)Y₁ receptor (hY₁) was constructed, energy refined and used to simulate molecular receptor interactions of the peptide ligands NPY, [L31, P34]NPY, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and of the nonpeptide antagonist R-N²-(diphenylacetyl)-N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-argininamide (BIBP3226) and its S-enantiomer BIBP3435. The best complementarity in charges between the receptor and the peptides, and the best structural accordance with experimental studies, was obtained with amino acid 1–4 of the peptides interacting with Asp194, Asp200, Gln201, Phe202 and Trp288 in the receptor. Arg33 and Arg35 of the peptides formed salt bridges with Asp104 and Asp287, respectively, while Tyr36 interacted in a binding pocket formed by Phe41, Thr42, Tyr100, Asn297, His298 and Phe302. Calculated electrostatic potentials around NPY and hY₁ molecules indicated that ligand binding is initiated by electrostatic interactions between a highly positive region in the N- and C-terminal parts of the peptides, and a negative region in the extracellular receptor domains. Molecular dynamics simulations of NPY and BIBP3226 interactions with the receptor indicated rigid body motions of TMH5 and TMH6 upon NPY binding as mechanisms of receptor activation, and that BIBP3226 may act as an antagonist by constraining these motions.     

Identification of a novel 65-kDa cell surface receptor common to pancreatic polypeptide, neuropeptide Y and peptide YY

By affinity cross-linking and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis, we identified a novel cell surface receptor on intact rat cells, which bound, with similar dissociation constants, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY), the members of the PP family. The receptor was detected on pancreatic islet and acinar cells, hepatocytes and epithelial cells of the stomach, duodenum and small intestine. Its molecular weight was estimated to be 65,000, and the cross-linking of [125I] labeled ligands was inhibited by an excess of unlabeled PP, NPY or PYY. The results suggest that the 65-kDa molecule is a common receptor for PP family peptides.     

Determination of affinity and activity of ligands at the human neuropeptide Y Y4 receptor by flow cytometry and aequorin luminescence

Fluorescence-labeled neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been used in flow cytometric binding assays for the determination of affinity constants of NPY Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor ligands. Because the binding of fluorescent NPY is insufficient for competition studies at the human Y4 receptor (hY4R), we replaced Glu-4 in hPP with Lys for the derivatization with cyanine-5. Because cy5-[K(4)]hPP has high affinity (Kd 5.6 nM) to the hY4R, it was used as a probe in a flow cytometric binding assay. Specific binding of cy5-[K(4)]hPP to hY4R was visualized by confocal microscopy. The hY(4)R, the chimeric G protein G(qi5) and mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin were stably coexpressed in CHO cells. Aequorin luminescence was quantified in a microplate reader and by a CCD camera. By application of these methods 3-cyclohexyl-N-[(3-1H-imidazol-4-ylpropylamino)(imino)methyl]propanamide (UR-AK49) was discovered as the first nonpeptidic Y4R antagonist (pKi 4.17), a lead to be optimized in terms of potency and selectivity.     

2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP a novel Y5-receptor preferring ligand with strong stimulatory effect on food intake

Members of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family regulate many physiological processes via interaction with at least four functional, pharmacologically distinct Y-receptors. However, selective antagonists developed for several subtypes have not been useful in defining particular Y-receptor functions in vivo. To identify critical residues within members of the NPY family required for Y-receptor subtype-selectivity we have determined the contribution of each residue within NPY to receptor binding by replacing them with L-alanine. In a second study, chimeric peptides where single or stretches of residues were interchanged between members of the NPY family were generated and tested in radioligand binding studies. Overall, substituted alanine analogues exhibited similar orders of affinities at each Y-receptor subtype with no obvious subtype-selectivity. Residues of particular interest are Leu30 which exhibited selectivity for the Y4-receptor, whereas Asp16 does not appear to play any role in ligand binding. Several chimeric peptides, e.g., [K4]pancreatic polypeptide ([K4]PP) and [RYYSA(19-23)]PP clearly showed higher affinity at the Y4 and Y5 subtypes compared to the Y1 and Y2 subtypes. In addition, the transfer of a proline residue from position 14 to 13 in peptide YY decreases its affinity at the Y1-, Y4- and Y5-receptors but is unchanged at the Y2 subtype. Combining these results, and with the help of molecular modelling, second generation chimeras were designed. The most significant improvement was achieved in chimera 2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP where the affinity for the Y5 subtype increased by ninefold over that from NPY. Several of these compounds were also tested for their ability to stimulate food intake in a rat model. Interestingly, again 2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP showed the most dramatic effect with a major increase on food intake over a range of doses compared to NPY suggesting a possible synergistic effect of several Y-receptors on feeding behaviour.     

Spinal and peripheral modulation of gastric acid secretion and arterial pressure by neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, and pancreatic polypeptide in rats

Spinal and peripheral modulation of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion by the pancreatic polypeptide-fold (PP-fold) peptides, neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY), and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), in urethane-anesthetized rats was evaluated. Neuropeptide Y, PYY, and PP (400 pmol) were administered via intravenous (IV) and intrathecal (IT) injections. The ₂ antagonist, yohimbine, was used to evaluate the role of the ₂ adrenergic receptors in the modulation of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion by NPY, PYY, and PP. Peptide YY and PP (IV) rapidly increased pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Peptide YY and PP (IT) increased pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion following administration into the thoracic (T8–T10) region of the spinal cord. The ₂ adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine, did not modify the increases in pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion following PYY and PP (IV or IT) administration. Neuropeptide Y (IT) decreased pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. However, in the presence of ₂ adrenergic receptor blockade, pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion was potentiated by NPY (IT) administration. Therefore, the inhibitory effect of NPY (IT) on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion required the activation of ₂ adrenergic receptors in the spinal cord of rats. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was increased immediately following NPY and PYY (IV) administration. During the same time period, PP (IV) decreased MAP in anesthetized rats. Mean arterial blood pressure was rapidly increased by NPY and PYY (IT) in anesthetized rats. The increase in MAP following PYY (IT) was partially attenuated in the presence of yohimbine. The modulation of MAP and gastric acid secretion by the PP-fold peptides occurred by independent mechanisms at spinal and peripheral sites in the rat. The modulation of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion by PYY and PP in rats differed from that of the third member of the PP-fold family, NPY, following spinal and peripheral administration.     

Recent developments in our understanding of the physiological role of PP-fold peptide receptor subtypes

The three peptides pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) share a similar structure known as the PP-fold. There are four known human G-protein coupled receptors for the PP-fold peptides, namely Y1, Y2, Y4, and Y5, each of them being able to bind at least two of the three endogenous ligands. All three peptides are found in the circulation acting as hormones. Although NPY is only released from neurons, PYY and PP are primarily found in endocrine cells in the gut, where they exert such effects as inhibition of gall bladder secretion, gut motility, and pancreatic secretion. However, when PYY is administered in an experimental setting to animals, cloned receptors, or tissue preparations, it can mimic the effects of NPY in essentially all studies, making it difficult to study the effects of PP-fold peptides and to delineate what receptor and peptide accounts for a particular effect. Initial studies with transgenic animals confirmed the well-established action of NPY on metabolism, food-intake, vascular systems, memory, mood, neuronal excitability, and reproduction. More recently, using transgenic techniques and novel antagonists for the Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptors, NPY has been found to be a key player in the regulation of ethanol consumption and neuronal development.     

Cloning,pharmacology, and distribution of the neuropeptide Y-receptor Yb in rainbow trout

This work describes the isolation and pharmacological characterization of a neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The receptor exhibits approximately 45% amino acid sequence identity to mammalian Y1-subfamily receptors, Y1, Y4 and y6, a similar degree of identity as these subtypes display to one another. Because it displays highest sequence identity to zebrafish Yb (75%), we named it the trout Yb receptor. The receptor exhibits high binding affinity for zebrafish and human NPY and peptide YY (PYY) but not truncated forms of the peptides. Human pancreatic polypeptide (PP) also binds with high affinity. Y1 selective antagonists exhibit poor binding as is the case for Y2 and Y5 selective ligands. This binding profile supports membership in the Y1 subfamily. Sequence data also support this relationship suggesting that Yb is a fourth and separate member of the Y1 subfamily. NPY has a number of important physiological functions such as regulating food intake and reproduction. The expression of the receptor in the hypothalamus and telencephalon suggests a possible role in these processes. This and other receptors from this species have potential for improving aquaculture.     

Pancreatic polypeptide is secreted from and controls differentiation through its specific receptors in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells

Although the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family has been demonstrated to control bone metabolism, the role of pancreatic polypeptide (PP), which has structural homology with NPY and peptide YY (PYY) to share the NPY family receptors, in peripheral bone tissues has remained unknown. In the present study, we studied the regulatory roles of PP and its Y receptors using MC3T3-E1 cells, a murine transformed osteoblastic cell line, as a model for osteoblastic differentiation. We found that (1) PP mRNA was detected and increased during cell-contact-induced differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells; (2) the immunoreactivity of PP was detected by radioimmunoassay and increased in culture medium during differentiation; (3) all the types of NPY family receptor mRNAs (Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and y6) were found to increase during differentiation; (4) PP stimulated differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells in terms of ALP mRNA and BMP-2 mRNA. These findings suggested that MC3T3-E1 cells produce and secrete PP, which may in turn stimulate the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 through its specific receptors in an autocrine manner.     

The pancreatic polypeptide family and the migrating motor complex of the rat: differential effects in the duodenum and jejunum

AIM: To investigate the effects of members of the pancreatic polypeptide family on migrating myoelectric complexes in rats in vivo. METHODS: Rats were supplied with bipolar electrodes at 5 (duodenum), 15 and 25 cm (jejunum) distal to pylorus for electromyography. The natural ligands neuropeptide Y, pancreatic polypeptide, peptide YY1-36 and peptide YY3-36 were infused IV at doses of 0.5-400 pmol kg(-1) min(-1). The mechanisms of action were studied after pre-treatment with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) 1 mg kg(-1), guanethidine 3 mg kg(-1) and in bilaterally vagotomized animals. RESULTS: PP inhibited myoelectrical activity dose-dependently in both the duodenum (ED50 5.8 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) and jejunum (2.6 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)). PYY1-36 and PYY3-36 also had inhibitory effect in the jejunum (4.4 and 130 pmol kg(-1) min(-1), respectively). PYY1-36 had no significant effect in the duodenum, whereas PYY3-36 stimulated myoelectrical activity at the highest doses. NPY was without effect. In the jejunum neither L-NNA, guanethidine or vagotomy had any significant influence on the inhibitory effects of PP, PYY1-36 and PYY3-36. In the duodenum, the effect of PP was inhibited by guanethidine, but not L-NNA or vagotomy. The stimulatory effect of PYY3-36 in the duodenum was blocked by L-NNA and vagotomy, whereas guanethidine was without effect. CONCLUSION: Peptides of the PP family modulate small bowel motility differentially. Whereas their general effect is inhibitory in the jejunum, the mixing duodenal compartment is stimulated by PYY3-36, suggested to reflect receptor distribution distinction in the gut. This implicates distribution of distinct receptors in the gut being activated by either peptide.     

Blockade of pancreatic polypeptide-sensitive neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors by agonist peptides is prevented by modulators of sodium transport. Implications for receptor signaling and regulation

Ligand binding to rodent pancreatic polypeptide-responding neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors (here termed PP/NPY receptors), or to cloned Y4 or Y5 receptors, is selectively inhibited by amiloride, peptide or alkylating modulators of sodium transport. The PP/NPY and Y4 receptors are also selectively blocked by human or rat pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and the blocking peptides are not dissociated by high concentrations of alkali chlorides (which restore most of the binding of subtype-selective agonists to Y1 and Y2 sites). The PP/NPY receptors could also be blocked by NPY and related full-length peptides, including Y1-selective agonists (IC50 300-400 pM). The cloned Y(4) receptors from three species are much less sensitive to NPY or PYY. The sensitivity of both the PP/NPY sites and the Y(4) sites to Y2-selective peptides is quite low. The ligand attachment to PP/NPY sites is also very sensitive to peptidic Y1 antagonist ((Cys31,NVal34NPY27-36))2, which however blocks these sites at much higher molarities. Blockade of PP/NPY and Y4 sites by agonist peptides can be largely prevented by N5-substituted amiloride modulators of Na+ transport, and by RFamide NRNFLRF.NH2, but not by Ca2+ channel blockers, or by inhibitors of K+ transport. Protection of both PP/NPY and Y4 sites against blockade by human or rat pancreatic polypeptide is also afforded by short N-terminally truncated NPY-related peptides. The above results are consistent with a stringent and selective activity regulation for rabbit PP/NPY receptor(s) that may serve to differentiate agonists and constrain signaling, and could involve transporter-like interactants.     

Interaction of NPY compounds with the rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) reveals similarity to the NPY-Y2 receptor

The rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (rGIR) is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor awaiting pharmacological characterization. Among known receptors, rGIR exhibits highest sequence similarity to the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y(2) receptor (38-40%). The pharmacological profile of rGIR was investigated using (125)I-PYY(3-36), a Y(2)-preferring radioligand and several NPY analogs. rGIR displayed a similar displacement profile as reported for the Y(2) receptor, in that the Y(2)-selective C terminus fragments of NPY and PYY (NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36)) showed high affinity binding and activation of rGIR (low nanomolar range). The rank order potency for displacement was NPY(3-36)>PYY(3-36)=NPY>NPY(13-36)>Ac, Leu NPY(24-36)>[D-Trp(32)]-NPY>Leu(31), Pro(34)-NPY=hPP. NPY and Y(2)-selective agonists NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36) led to significant activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding to rGIR transfected cells. BIIE0246, a specific Y(2) antagonist, displaced (125)I-PYY(3-36) binding to rGIR with high affinity (95nM). Activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding by Y(2)-selective agonist in rGIR transfected cells was also completely abolished by BIIE0246. Our data report, for the first time, an interaction of NPY ligands with rGIR expressed in vitro, and indicate similarities between GIR and the NPY-Y(2) receptor.     

Analogs of pancreatic polypeptide and peptide YY with a locked PP-fold structure are biologically active

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), members of the PP-fold family share a high degree of sequence homology. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray crystallography studies have shown these peptides can adopt a tightly organized tertiary structure called the PP-fold, which has long been assumed to be the active structure of this family of peptides. To date, however, no studies have been completed with PYY and PP which confirm if the PP-fold structure is important for their physiological actions. The aim of the study was to test if PYY and PP locked into the PP-fold maintained biological activity. Therefore, we designed and produced analogs of PP and PYY in a cyclic conformation with two cysteine amino acid substitutions at the N-terminus and at position 27. These were oxidized to form a cysteine disulfide bond locking the peptides into the PP-fold structure. Studies demonstrate that the cyclic analogs have both similar in vivo activity to their parent molecules, and affinity for the Y2 and Y4 receptors. Results suggest that the proposed PP and PYY-fold is likely to be their biologically active conformation.     

Pharmacological characterization of cloned chicken neuropeptide Y receptors Y1 and Y5

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes Y1 and Y5 are involved in the regulation of feeding and several other physiological functions in mammals. To increase our understanding of the origin and mechanisms of the complex NPY system, we report here the cloning and pharmacological characterization of receptors Y1 and Y5 in the first non-mammal, chicken (Gallus gallus). The receptors display 80-83% and 64-72% amino acid sequence identity, respectively, with their mammalian orthologues. The three endogenous ligands NPY, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) have similar affinities as in mammals, i.e. NPY and PYY have subnanomolar affinity for both receptors whereas chicken PP bound with nanomolar affinity to Y5 but not to Y1. A notable difference to mammalian receptor subtypes is that the Y1 antagonist SR120819A does not bind chicken Y1, whereas BIBP3226 does. The Y5 antagonist CGP71863A binds to the chicken Y5 receptor. Anatomically, both Y1 and Y5 have high mRNA expression levels in the infundibular nucleus which is the homologous structure of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in mammals. These results suggest that some of the selective Y1 and Y5 antagonists developed in mammals can be used to study appetite regulation in chicken.     

Evolution of neuropeptide Y and its related peptides

1. The neuropeptide Y (NPY) family of peptides includes also the gut endocrine peptide YY (PYY), tetrapod pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and fish pancreatic peptide-tyrosine (PY). All peptides are 36 amino acids long.2. Sequences from many types of vertebrates show that NPY has remained extremely well conserved throughout vertebrate evolution with 92% identity between mammals and cartilaginous fishes.3. PYY has 97–100% identity between cartilaginous fishes and bony fishes, but is less conserved in amphibians and mammals (83% identity between amphibians and sharks and 75% identity between mammals and sharks).4. NPY and PYY share 70–80% identity in most species.5. Both NPY and PYY were present in the early vertebrate ancestor because both peptides have been found in lampreys.6. The tissue distribution appears to have been largely conserved between phyla, except that PYY has more widespread neuronal expression in lower vertebrates.7. Pancreatic polypeptide has diverged considerably among tetrapods leaving only 50% identity between mammals, birdsJreptiles and frogs.8. Several lines of evidence suggest that the PP gene arose by duplication of the PYY gene, probably in the early evolution of the tetrapods.9. The pancreatic peptide PY found in anglerfish and daddy sculpin may have resulted from an independent duplication of the PYY gene.10. The relationships of the recently described mollusc and worm peptides NPF and PYF with the NPY family still appear unclear.     

Ligand-mimicking Receptor Variant Discloses Binding and Activation Mode of Prolactin-releasing Peptide

The prolactin-releasing peptide receptor and its bioactive RF-amide peptide (PrRP20) have been investigated to explore the ligand binding mode of peptide G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). By receptor mutagenesis, we identified the conserved aspartate in the upper transmembrane helix 6 (Asp(6.59)) of the receptor as the first position that directly interacts with arginine 19 of the ligand (Arg(19)). Replacement of Asp(6.59) with Arg(19) of PrRP20 led to D6.59R, which turned out to be a constitutively active receptor mutant (CAM). This suggests that the mutated residue at the top of transmembrane helix 6 mimics Arg(19) by interacting with additional binding partners in the receptor. Next, we generated an initial comparative model of this CAM because no ligand docking was required, and we selected the next set of receptor mutants to find the engaged partners of the binding pocket. In an iterative process, we identified two acidic residues and two hydrophobic residues that form the peptide ligand binding pocket. As all residues are localized on top or in the upper part of the transmembrane domains, we clearly can show that the extracellular surface of the receptor is sufficient for full signal transduction for prolactin-releasing peptide, rather than a deep, membrane-embedded binding pocket. This contributes to the knowledge of the binding of peptide ligands to GPCRs and might facilitate the development of GPCR ligands, but it also provides new targeting of CAMs involved in hereditary diseases.     

Neuropeptide Y family of peptides: structure, anatomical expression, function, and molecular evolution.

Evolutionary relationships between neuroendocrine peptides are often difficult to resolve across divergent phyla due to independent duplication events in different lineages. Thanks to peptide purification and molecular cloning in many different species, the situation is beginning to clear for the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family, which also includes peptide YY (PYY), the tetrapod pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and the fish pancreatic peptide Y (PY). It has long been assumed that the first duplication to occur in vertebrate evolution generated NPY and PYY, as both of these are found in all gnathostomes as well as lamprey. Evidence from other gene families show that this duplication was probably a chromosome duplication event. The origin of a second PYY peptide found in lamprey remains to be explained. Our recent cloning of NPY, PYY and PY in the sea bass proves that fish PY is a separate gene product. We favour the hypothesis that PY is a duplicate of the PYY gene and that it may have occurred late in fish evolution, as PY has so far only been found in acanthomorph fishes. Thus, this duplication seems to be independent of the one that generate PP from PYY in tetrapods, although both tetrapod PP and fish PY are expressed in the pancreas. Studies in the sea bass and other fish show that PY, in contrast to PP, is expressed in the nervous system. We review the literature on the distribution and functional aspects of the various NPY-family peptides in vertebrates.