Puzzling Chromosome Behavior in Triploid Females of Drosophila melanogaster

Based on a particular formation of the chromocenter and trivalents in triploid Drosophila females, as well as on asynapsis in pericentromeric regions (which is a result of trivalent competition), an explanation for the increased frequency of crossing over and nonrandom segregation of the X chromosomes and autosomes in the first meiotic division is suggested. It is proposed that a delay in pairing of the pericentromeric heterochromatic chromosome regions combined into a single chromocenter leads to the following: (1) formation of the heteroduplex structures (X structures) takes more time and, consequently, their number and the frequency of crossing over in the paired chromosome regions increases; (2) in nonhomologous chromosomes, the chromocentral connections, which normally degrade in prometaphase, are retained to fulfill a function of coorientation during the first meiotic division.     

Puzzling chromosome behavior in triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster

Based on a particular formation of the chromocenter and trivalents in triploid Drosophila females, as well as on asynapsis in pericentromeric regions (which is a result of trivalent competition), an explanation for the increased frequency of crossing over and nonrandom segregation of the X chromosomes and autosomes in the first meiotic division is suggested. It is proposed that a delay in pairing of the pericentromeric heterochromatic chromosome regions combined into a single chromocenter leads to the following: (1) formation of the heteroduplex structures (X structures) takes more time and, consequently, their number and the frequency of crossing over in the paired chromosome regions increases; (2) in nonhomologous chromosomes, the chromocentral connections, which normally degrade in prometaphase, are retained to fulfill a function of coorientation during the first meiotic division.     

Compound Autosomes in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: The Meiotic Behavior of Compound Thirds

Studies of the meiotic distribution of compound-3 chromosomes in males and females of Drosophila melanogaster provided the following results. (1) From females homozygous for the standard arrangement of all chromosomes other than C(3L) and C(3R), less than 5% of the gametes recovered were nullosomic or disomic for compound-3 chromosomes. The frequency of nonsegregation differed between strains, but within a given strain it remained relatively constant. (2) According to egg-hatch frequencies, C(3L) and C(3R) segregate independently during spermatogenesis. (3) In females, structurally heterozygous second chromosomes occasion a marked increase in the recovery of nonsegregational progeny; in males, rearranged seconds have no apparent influence on the distribution of compound thirds. (4) The highest frequencies of nonsegregational progeny were recovered from C(3L);C(3R) females carrying compound-X (plus free Y) chromosomes. (5) In comparing the recovery of nonsegregating compound thirds to the recovery of rearranged heterologs, a definite nonrandom distribution was realized in several crosses. These results are examined in reference to the concepts of distributive pairing (Grell 1962). Moreover, considering the structural nature of compound autosomes, we propose that nonhomologous (distributive) pairing is a property of the centromeric region and suggest that rearrangements involving breaks in this region possibly alter the effectiveness of distributive pairing forces.     

Origin of reciprocal translocations and their effect in Clarkia speciosa

Reciprocal translocations occur in high frequencies in Clarkia speciosa and closely related species. Observations from C. speciosa suggest this species is predisposed to translocations involving breaks in or adjacent to the centrochromatin (centromeric chromatin) due to the characteristic association of all nonhomologous centrochromatin in the genome during early meiotic prophase. Translocation heterozygote multiples involving six different breaks were examined for homologous pairing and in each case the euchromatic arms were completely paired, the change in homologous pairing occuring within the nonhomologous centrochromatic association. Such a proximal exchange point precludes the possibility of a structurally determined interstitial or differential region and, therefore, any genetically differential regions that might exist must be maintained solely by means of distal localization of crossing over. — The frequency of chromosomal nondisjunction (adjacent segregation) was found to be positively correlated with the number of chromosomes in the translocation multiple. Rings of four chromosomes had an average disjunction of over 99% and therefore had little affect on fertility whereas the largest multiples of 16 chromosomes had an average disjunction of about 10% and correspondingly low fertility.     

Evidence for the Single Phase Pairing Theory of Meiosis

The segregation pattern of an attached X chromosome with several Y-autosome translocations conflicts with the expectations based on the distributive pairing hypothesis because the chromosomes segregating from the translocation configuration include both exchange and non-exchange chromosomes. The results of the second experiment involving three compound chromosomes go even further; they suggest that the essential association which determines the segregation of nonhomologous elements is in fact set up prior to the time of crossing over.     

Meiotic Chromosome Behavior Influenced by Mutation-Altered Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Females

The effects of a female-specific meiotic mutation, altered disjunction (ald: 361), are described. Although ald females show normal levels of meiotic exchange, sex- and 4th-chromosome nondisjunction occurs at an elevated level. A large proportion of the nondisjunction events is the result of nonhomologous disjunction of the sex and 4th chromosomes. These nonhomologous disjunction events, and probably all nondisjunction events occurring in ald females, are the result of two anomalies in chromosome behavior: (1) X chromosomes derived from exchange tetrads undergo nonhomologous disjunction and (2) the 4th chromosomes nonhomologously disjoin from larger chromosomes. There is at best a marginal effect of ald on the meiotic behavior of chromosomes 2 or 3. The results suggest that the ald⁺ gene product acts to prevent the participation of exchange X chromosomes and all 4th chromosomes in nonhomologous disjunction events. The possible role of ald⁺ in current models of the disjunction process is considered.     

Meiotic mutations from natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster

Two meiotic genes from natural populations are described. A female meiotic mutation,mei(1)g13, mapped to 17.4 on the X chromosome, causes nondisjunction of all homologs except for the fourth chromosomes. In addition, it reduces recombination by 10% in the homozygotes and causes 18% increased recombination in the heterozygotes. A male meiotic mutation,mei-1223 ^m144 , is located on the third chromosome. Although this mutation causes nondisjunction of all chromosomes, each chromosome pair exhibits a different nondisjunction frequency. Large variations in the sizes of the premature sperm heads observed in the homozygotes may reflect irregular meiotic pairing and the subsequent abnormal segregation, resulting in aneuploid chromosome complements.     

Sexual maldevelopment and sex reversal, chromosomal causes

The SRY gene on the Y chromosome is the testis determining factor (TDF). It is therefore the initial male determining factor. However, phenotypic sex determination includes a cascade of genes located on autosomes as well as sex chromosomes. Aberrations of these genes may cause sexual maldevelopment or sex reversal. Abnormalities may include single gene mutations and gene loss or gain-changes may involve only sex organs or may be part of syndromes. These changes may also arise as chromosome abnormalities involving contiguous genes. Eight cases with chromosomal abnormalities involving different causative mechanisms are described herein. The most common cause is nondisjunction, including loss or gain of sex chromosomes. Less common causes are mispairing and crossing over in meiosis, chromosome breaks with repair, nonhomologous pairing due to low copy repeats and crossing over, and translocation (familial or de novo) with segregation. Cases include: [see: text].     

Cytogenetic Analysis of a Segment of the Y Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Males carrying a large deficiency in the long arm of the Y chromosome known to delete the fertility gene kl-2 are sterile and exhibit a complex phenotype: (1) First metaphase chromosomes are irregular in outline and appear sticky; (2) spermatids contain micronuclei; (3) the nebenkerns of the spermatids are nonuniform in size; (4) a high molecular weight protein ordinarily present in sperm is absent; and (5) crystals appear in the nucleus and cytoplasm of spermatocytes and spermatids. In such males that carry Ste⁺ on their X chromosome the crystals appear long and needle shaped; in Ste males the needles are much shorter and assemble into star-shaped aggregates. The large deficiency may be subdivided into two shorter component deficiencies. The more distal is male sterile and lacks the high molecular weight polypeptide; the more proximal is responsible for the remainder of the phenotype. Ste males carrying the more proximal component deficiency are sterile, but Ste ⁺ males are fertile. Genetic studies of chromosome segregation in such males reveal that (1) both the sex chromosomes and the large autosomes undergo nondisjunction, (2) the fourth chromosomes disjoin regularly, (3) sex chromosome nondisjunction is more frequent in cells in which the second or third chromosomes nondisjoin than in cells in which autosomal disjunction is regular, (4) in doubly exceptional cells, the sex chromosomes tend to segregate to the opposite pole from the autosomes and (5) there is meiotic drive; i.e., reciprocal meiotic products are not recovered with equal frequencies, complements with fewer chromosomes being recovered more frequently than those with more chromosomes. The proximal component deficiency can itself be further subdivided into two smaller component deficiencies, both of which have nearly normal spermatogenic phenotypes as observed in the light microscope. Meiosis in Ste ⁺ males carrying either of these small Y deficiencies is normal; Ste males, however, exhibit low levels of sex chromosome nondisjunction with either deficient Y. The meiotic phenotype is apparently sensitive to the amount of Y chromosome missing and to the Ste constitution of the X chromosome.     

Chromocentral nature of interchromosome connections coorienting nonhomologous chromosomes in meiosis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> females

Data are presented in favor of universal significance of physical connections between pericentromeric regions of homologs in their orientation to the opposite poles of the first meiotic division in Drosophila melanogaster. Disturbances in the formation of such connections caused by structural or locus mutations are compensated for by the presence of pericentromeric chiasmata between homologs or (in the case of their absence) by chromocentral connections between nonhomologs being preserved up to the prometaphase. In the latter case, an interchromosome effect on chromosome disjunction and nonhomologous pairing is registered by genetic methods. Inhibition of the formation of the division spindle fibers during prometaphase of meiosis 1 by the long-term action of colcemide promotes the retention of connections between paired nonexchanged homologs and between nonhomologous chromosomes with abnormal homologous pairing because of heterozygosity for numerous inversions and transpositions (X and autosome 2). These connections are registered cytologically. Cytologically registered are also connections between normal X chromosomes and metacentric compounds by the arms of autosome 2 (C(2L)RM, C(2R)RM), which is the known case of the interchromosome effect on chromosome nondisjunction. It is supposed that cytologically detected associations between compounds are realized through a normal mechanism, as a result of interaction and formation of orienting connections between the homologous pericentromeric regions of these compounds. Cytological evidence is presented for colocation of compounds in the chromocentrally organized nucleus of somatic and germline cells.     

All paired up with no place to go: pairing, synapsis, and DSB formation in a balancer heterozygote

The multiply inverted X chromosome balancer FM7 strongly suppresses, or eliminates, the occurrence of crossing over when heterozygous with a normal sequence homolog. We have utilized the LacI-GFP: lacO system to visualize the effects of FM7 on meiotic pairing, synapsis, and double-strand break formation in Drosophila oocytes. Surprisingly, the analysis of meiotic pairing and synapsis for three lacO reporter couplets in FM7/X heterozygotes revealed they are paired and synapsed during zygotene/pachytene in 70%–80% of oocytes. Moreover, the regions defined by these lacO couplets undergo double-strand break formation at normal frequency. Thus, even complex aberration heterozygotes usually allow high frequencies of meiotic pairing, synapsis, and double-strand break formation in Drosophila oocytes. However, the frequencies of failed pairing and synapsis were still 1.5- to 2-fold higher than were observed for corresponding regions in oocytes with two normal sequence X chromosomes, and this effect was greatest near a breakpoint. We propose that heterozygosity for breakpoints creates a local alteration in synaptonemal complex structure that is propagated across long regions of the bivalent in a fashion analogous to chiasma interference, which also acts to suppress crossing over.     

From the phenomenon of nondisjunction to the problem of chromosome co-orientation (75th anniversary of Bridges' article]

The concepts of the mechanism of chromosome nondisjunction in Drosophila are described in a historical retrospective. Evidences are given for the appropriateness of the term co-orientation in the traditional sense used by geneticists treating nondisjunction. There are 6 variants of co-operation in Drosophila meiosis depending upon the number and particular chromosomes involved in co-orientation. The classical chromosome nondisjunction is a variant of co-orientation in the bivalent composed of two homologous chromosomes. By comparing the different variants of pairing (pairing in bi- and multivalents) resulting in co-orientation, the elementary events preceding co-orientation may be identified. The author reviews his recent data concerning the similarities of the co-orientation of two homologs and the co-orientation of two nonhomologs in Drosophila meiosis. The concept of the role of pairing in the precentromeric heterochromatic region during chromosome co-orientation is considered, and the hypothesis of delayed pairing in this region during meiotic prophase is put forward. Based on the suggested hypothesis clarified are (i) the relationship of pairing, crossing over, and disjunction of homologous chromosomes (ii) the relationship of crossing over and co-orientation of nonhomologous chromosomes, and (iii) the time when the contact resulting in nonhomolog co-orientation takes place.     

The morphological sequence of XY pairing in the Norway rat Rattus norvegicus

The sequence of XY pairing at meiotic prophase in the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus, has been studied in spread preparations of spermatocytes obtained from pubertal males. As in most mammals, sex chromosome pairing is delayed in relation to that of the autosomes. At one stage in pachytene, the Y is fully paired in synaptonemal complex association with about one-third of the X. Observation in spread preparations at pachytene and diplotene and in air-dried metaphase I preparations indicates that the long arm of the Y pairs with the short arm of the X. Pairing of the Y with both ends of the X is seen in about 4% of pachytene spermatocytes. The possibility that XY pairing in the rat may be nonhomologous (Ashley 1983) is considered, and the view is expressed that the XY synaptonemal complex may be incomplete in fine structural detail, thus not providing for the effective pairing required in true reciprocal recombination. The same mechanism that excludes crossing over from heterochromatic regions of autosomes may also operate to minimize or prevent crossing over in the sex pair of mammals.     

The mechanism of secondary nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females

Bridges (1916) observed that X chromosome nondisjunction was much more frequent in XXY females than it was in genetically normal XX females. In addition, virtually all cases of X nondisjunction in XXY females were due to XX <--> Y segregational events in oocytes in which the two X chromosomes had failed to undergo crossing over. He referred to these XX <--> Y segregation events as "secondary nondisjunction." Cooper (1948) proposed that secondary nondisjunction results from the formation of an X-Y-X trivalent, such that the Y chromosome directs the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosomes to opposite poles on the first meiotic spindle. Using in situ hybridization to X and YL chromosomal satellite sequences, we demonstrate that XX <--> Y segregations are indeed presaged by physical associations of the X and Y chromosomal heterochromatin. The physical colocalization of the three sex chromosomes is observed in virtually all oocytes in early prophase and maintained at high frequency until midprophase in all genotypes examined. Although these XXY associations are usually dissolved by late prophase in oocytes that undergo X chromosomal crossing over, they are maintained throughout prophase in oocytes with nonexchange X chromosomes. The persistence of such XXY associations in the absence of exchange presumably facilitates the segregation of the two X chromosomes and the Y chromosome to opposite poles on the developing meiotic spindle. Moreover, the observation that XXY pairings are dissolved at the end of pachytene in oocytes that do undergo X chromosomal crossing over demonstrates that exchanges can alter heterochromatic (and thus presumably centromeric) associations during meiotic prophase.     

Orientation Disruptor (ord): A Recombination-Defective and Disjunction-Defective Meiotic Mutant in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The effects of a semidominant autosomal meiotic mutant, orientation disruptor (symbol: ord), located at 2–103.5 on the genetic map and in region 59B-D of the salivary map, have been examined genetically and cytologically. The results are as follows. (1) Crossing over in homozygous females is reduced to about seven percent of controls on all chromosomes, with the reduction greatest in distal regions. (2) Crossing over on different chromosomes is independent. (3) Reductional nondisjunction of any given chromosome is increased to about thirty percent of gametes from homozygous females. The probability of such nondisjunction is the same among exchange and nonexchange tetrads with the exception that a very proximal exchange tends to regularize segregation. (4) Equational nondisjunction of each chromosome is increased to about ten percent of gametes in homozygous females; this nondisjunction is independent of exchange. (5) The distributive pairing system is operative in homozygous females. (6) In homozygous males, reductional nondisjunction of each chromosome is increased to about ten percent, and equational nondisjunction to about twenty percent, of all gametes. (7) Cytologically, two distinct meiotic divisions occur in spermatocytes of homozygous males. The first division looks normal although occasional univalents are present at prophase I and a few lagging chromosomes are seen at anaphase I. However, sister chromatids of most chromosomes have precociously separated by metaphase II. Possible functions of the ord⁺ gene are considered.     

The Genetic Analysis of Distributive Segregation in Drosophila Melanogaster. I. Isolation and Characterization of Aberrant X Segregation (Axs), a Mutation Defective in Chromosome Partner Choice

We describe the isolation and characterization of Aberrant X segregation (Axs), a dominant female-specific meiotic mutation. Although Axs has little or no effect on the frequency or distribution of exchange, or on the disjunction of exchange bivalents, nonexchange X chromosomes undergo nondisjunction at high frequencies in Axs/+ and Axs/Axs females. This increased X chromosome nondisjunction is shown to be a consequence of an Axs-induced defect in distributive segregation. In Axs-bearing females, fourth chromosome nondisjunction is observed only in the presence of nonexchange X chromosomes and is argued to be the result of improper X and fourth chromosome associations within the distributive system. In XX females bearing a compound fourth chromosome, the frequency of nonhomologous disjunction of the X chromosomes from the compound fourth chromosome is shown to account for at least 80% of the total X nondisjunction observed. In addition, Axs diminishes or ablates the capacity of nonexchange X chromosomes to form trivalents in females bearing either a Y chromosome or a small free duplication for the X. Axs also impairs compound X from Y segregation. The effect of Axs on these segregations parallels the defects observed for homologous nonexchange X chromosome disjunction in Axs females. In addition to its dramatic effects on the X chromosome, Axs exerts a similar effect on the segregation of a major autosome. We conclude that Axs defines a locus required for proper homolog disjunction within the distributive system.     

On the Control of the Distribution of Meiotic Exchange in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The effects of eight recombination-defective meiotic mutants on crossing over within the X heterochromatin were examined. Since none permit substantial frequencies of exchange within heterochromatin although six lessen or abolish constraints on the location of exchanges within euchromatin, the systems that prohibit exchange within heterochromatin and that govern where exchanges will occur in euchromatin are under separate genetic control.—A minor component of the effects of mei-218 is the production of nonhomologous exchanges; of mei-9 is the recovery of deleted chromatids; and of mei-41 is the recovery of deleted chromatids and/or a low frequency of heterochromatic exchanges.     

Nondisjunction Mutants of the Nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

The frequency of males (5AA; XO) among the self progeny of wild-type Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites (5AA; XX) is about one in 500. Fifteen him (for "high incidence of males") mutations have been identified that increase this frequency by a factor of ten to 150, as a result of increased X-chromosome nondisjunction. The mutations define ten complementation groups, which have been mapped: nine are autosomal, and one sex linked. Most of the mutants are superficially wild type in anatomy and behavior; however, him-4 mutants display gonadal abnormalities, and unc-86 mutants, which have a Him phenotype, exhibit a variety of anatomical and behavioral abnormalities. All the mutants segregate fertile 3X hermaphrodite progeny as well as XO male progeny. Some produce large numbers of inviable zygotes. Mutants in all ten genes produce diplo-X and nullo-X exceptional ova, and in the four strains tested, diplo-X and nullo-X exceptional sperm are produced by 2X "transformed" males. It appears likely that most of the mutants have defects in both gamete lines of the hermaphrodite. XO males of him strains other than him-4 and unc-86 are similar to wild-type males in anatomy and behavior, and all produce equal or almost equal numbers of haplo-X and nullo-X sperm, and no diplo-X sperm. Male fertility is reduced to varying extents in all him mutants. In four of the strains, nondisjunction during oogenesis has been shown to occur at a reductional division, and in three of these strains, abnormalities in recombination have been demonstrated. One mutant also exhibits autosomal nondisjunction, but many of the others probably do not. Therefore, the X chromosome of C. elegans may differ from the autosomes in the mechanisms controlling its meiotic behavior.——3X hermaphrodites are shorter and less fertile than 2X hermaphrodites, and they produce many inviable zygotes among their self progeny: these are probably 4X zygotes. Haplo-X and diplo-X ova are produced in 2:1 ratio by 3X hermaphrodites. him mutations are expressed in these animals, increasing the frequency of self-progeny males and 2X hermaphrodites.     

Sex Chromosome Meiotic Drive in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Males

In Drosophila melanogaster males, deficiency for X heterochromatin causes high X-Y nondisjunction and skewed sex chromosome segregation ratios (meiotic drive). Y and XY classes are recovered poorly because of sperm dysfunction. In this study it was found that X heterochromatic deficiencies disrupt recovery not only of the Y chromosome but also of the X and autosomes, that both heterochromatic and euchromatic regions of chromosomes are affected and that the "sensitivity" of a chromosome to meiotic drive is a function of its length. Two models to explain these results are considered. One is a competitive model that proposes that all chromosomes must compete for a scarce chromosome-binding material in Xh(-) males. The failure to observe competitive interactions among chromosome recovery probabilities rules out this model. The second is a pairing model which holds that normal spermiogenesis requires X-Y pairing at special heterochromatic pairing sites. Unsaturated pairing sites become gametic lethals. This model fails to account for autosomal sensitivity to meiotic drive. It is also contradicted by evidence that saturation of Y-pairing sites fails to suppress meiotic drive in Xh(- ) males and that extra X-pairing sites in an otherwise normal male do not induce drive. It is argued that meiotic drive results from separation of X euchromatin from X heterochromatin.