From flour to flower: how Polycomb group proteins influence multiple aspects of plant development

Cell identity and differentiation are determined by patterns of regulatory gene expression. Spatially and temporally regulated homeotic gene expression defines segment identities along the anterior-posterior axis of animal embryos. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins form a cellular memory system that maintains the repressed state of homeotic gene expression. Conserved PcG proteins control multiple aspects of Arabidopsis development and maintain homeotic gene repression. In animals, PcG proteins repress their target genes by modifying histone tails through deacetylation and methylation, generating a PcG-specific histone code that recruits other chromatin remodeling proteins to establish a stable, heritable mechanism of epigenetic expression control. Plant PcG proteins might function through a similar biochemical mechanism owing to their conserved structural and functional relationship to animal PcG proteins.     

Association of trxG and PcG proteins with the bxd maintenance element depends on transcriptional activity

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins act in an epigenetic fashion to maintain active and repressive states of expression of the Hox and other target genes by altering their chromatin structure. Genetically, mutations in trxG and PcG genes can antagonize each other's function, whereas mutations of genes within each group have synergistic effects. Here, we show in Drosophila that multiple trxG and PcG proteins act through the same or juxtaposed sequences in the maintenance element (ME) of the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax. Surprisingly, trxG or PcG proteins, but not both, associate in vivo in any one cell in a salivary gland with the ME of an activated or repressed Ultrabithorax transgene, respectively. Among several trxG and PcG proteins, only Ash1 and Asx require Trithorax in order to bind to their target genes. Together, our data argue that at the single-cell level, association of repressors and activators correlates with gene silencing and activation, respectively. There is, however, no overall synergism or antagonism between and within the trxG and PcG proteins and, instead, only subsets of trxG proteins act synergistically.     

Diverse functions of Polycomb group proteins during plant development

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins play essential roles in animal and plant life cycles by controlling the expression of important developmental regulators. These structurally heterogeneous proteins form multimeric protein complexes that control higher order chromatin structure and, thereby, the expression state of their target genes. Once established, PcG proteins maintain silent gene expression states over many cell divisions providing a molecular basis for a cellular 'memory.' PcG proteins are best known for their role in the control of homeotic genes in Drosophila and mammals. In addition, they play important roles in the control of cell proliferation in vertebrate and invertebrate systems. Recent studies in plants have shown that PcG proteins regulate diverse developmental processes and, as in animals, they affect both homeotic gene expression and cell proliferation. Thus, the function of PcG proteins has been widely conserved between the plant and animal kingdoms.     

Programming of gene expression by Polycomb group proteins

Polycomb group (PcG) complexes maintain epigenetically repressed states that need to be reprogrammed when cells become committed to differentiation. In contrast to the previously held belief that PcG complexes regulate only a few selected genes, recent efforts have revealed hundreds of potential PcG targets in mammals, insects and plants. These results have changed our perception about PcG recruitment and function on chromatin. Both in animals and plants, evolutionarily conserved PcG complexes mark the chromatin of their target genes by methylation at histone H3 lysine 27. Surprisingly, however, both the proteins recognizing this mark and the mechanisms causing gene repression differ between both kingdoms. This suggests that different developmental strategies used in plant and animal development entailed the evolution of different repressive maintenance mechanisms.     

Polycomb group and trithorax group proteins in Arabidopsis

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins form molecular modules of a cellular memory mechanism that maintains gene expression states established by other regulators. In general, PcG proteins are responsible for maintaining a repressed expression state, whereas trxG proteins act in opposition to maintain an active expression state. This mechanism, first discovered in Drosophila and subsequently in mammals, has more recently been studied in plants. The characterization of several Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) components in Arabidopsis thaliana constituted a first breakthrough, revealing key roles of PcG proteins in the control of crucial plant developmental processes. Interestingly, the recent identification of plant homologues of the Drosophila trithorax protein suggests a conservation of both the PcG and trxG gene regulatory system in plants. Here, we review the current evidence for the role of PcG and trxG proteins in the control of plant development, their biochemical functions, their interplay in maintaining stable expression states of their target genes, and point out future directions which may help our understanding of PcG and trxG function in plants.     

Maintenance of the patterns of expression of homeotic genes in the development of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> by proteins of the polycomb,trithorax, and ETP groups

Proteins encoded by genes of the Polycomb (PcG), trithorax (trxG), and the Enhancer of trithorax and Polycomb (ETP) groups are important regulators of expression of most developmental genes. Data concerning all currently described genes assigned to these groups are summarized in the review. Genetic interactions of these genes and phenotypic manifestation of their mutations are described. Data on the PcG, trxG, and ETP proteins are systematized. Questions are considered concerning the formation of multimeric complexes containing proteins of these groups, recruitment of these complexes to regulatory elements of target genes, and the mechanisms of activation/repression of gene expression.     

Molecular and genetic analysis of the Polycomb group gene Sex combs extra/Ring in Drosophila

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins repress homeotic genes and other developmental regulatory genes in cells where these genes must remain inactive during development. In Drosophila and in vertebrates, PcG proteins exist in two distinct multiprotein complexes, the Esc/Eed-E(z) complex and PRC1. Drosophila PRC1 contains Polycomb, Posterior sexcombs and Polyhomeotic, the products of three PcG genes that are critically needed for PcG silencing. Formation of stable PRC1 requires Ring, the product of a gene for which no mutations have been described. Here, we show that Sex combs extra (Sce) encodes Ring and that Sce/Ring function is critically required for PcG silencing.     

Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins bind and regulate hundreds of genes. Previous evidence has suggested that long-range chromatin interactions may contribute to the regulation of PcG target genes. Here, we adapted the Chromosome Conformation Capture on Chip (4C) assay to systematically map chromosomal interactions in Drosophila melanogaster larval brain tissue. Our results demonstrate that PcG target genes interact extensively with each other in nuclear space. These interactions are highly specific for PcG target genes, because non-target genes with either low or high expression show distinct interactions. Notably, interactions are mostly limited to genes on the same chromosome arm, and we demonstrate that a topological rather than a sequence-based mechanism is responsible for this constraint. Our results demonstrate that many interactions among PcG target genes exist and that these interactions are guided by overall chromosome architecture.     

Quantitative in vivo analysis of chromatin binding of Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins reveals retention of ASH1 on mitotic chromatin

The Polycomb (PcG) and Trithorax (TrxG) group proteins work antagonistically on several hundred developmentally important target genes, giving stable mitotic memory, but also allowing flexibility of gene expression states. How this is achieved in quantitative terms is poorly understood. Here, we present a quantitative kinetic analysis in living Drosophila of the PcG proteins Enhancer of Zeste, (E(Z)), Pleiohomeotic (PHO) and Polycomb (PC) and the TrxG protein absent, small or homeotic discs 1 (ASH1). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy reveal highly dynamic chromatin binding behaviour for all proteins, with exchange occurring within seconds. We show that although the PcG proteins substantially dissociate from mitotic chromatin, ASH1 remains robustly associated with chromatin throughout mitosis. Finally, we show that chromatin binding by ASH1 and PC switches from an antagonistic relationship in interphase, to a cooperative one during mitosis. These results provide quantitative insights into PcG and TrxG chromatin-binding dynamics and have implications for our understanding of the molecular nature of epigenetic memory.     

RNAi components are required for nuclear clustering of Polycomb group response elements

Drosophila Polycomb group (PcG) proteins silence homeotic genes through binding to Polycomb group response elements (PREs). Fab-7 is a PRE-containing regulatory element from the homeotic gene Abdominal-B. When present in multiple copies in the genome, Fab-7 can induce long-distance gene contacts that enhance PcG-dependent silencing. We show here that components of the RNA interference (RNAi) machinery are involved in PcG-mediated silencing at Fab-7 and in the production of small RNAs at transgenic Fab-7 copies. In general, these mutations do not affect the recruitment of PcG components, but they are specifically required for the maintenance of long-range contacts between Fab-7 copies. Dicer-2, PIWI, and Argonaute1, three RNAi components, frequently colocalize with PcG bodies, and their mutation significantly reduces the frequency of PcG-dependent chromosomal associations of endogenous homeotic genes. This suggests a novel role for the RNAi machinery in regulating the nuclear organization of PcG chromatin targets.