Methyl-accepting protein associated with bacterial sensory rhodopsin I.

In vivo radiolabeling of Halobacterium halobium phototaxis mutants and revertants with L-[methyl-3H] methionine implicated seven methyl-accepting protein bands with apparent molecular masses from 65 to 150 kilodaltons (kDa) in adaptation of the organism to chemo and photo stimuli, and one of these (94 kDa) was specifically implicated in phototaxis. The lability of the radiolabeled bands to mild base treatment indicated that the methyl linkages are carboxylmethylesters, as is the case in the eubacterial chemotaxis receptor-transducers. The 94-kDa protein was present in increased amounts in an overproducer of the apoprotein of sensory rhodopsin I, one of two retinal-containing phototaxis receptors in H. halobium. It was absent in a strain that contained sensory rhodopsin II and that lacked sensory rhodopsin I and was also absent in a mutant that lacked both photoreceptors. Based on the role of methyl-accepting proteins in chemotaxis in other bacteria, we suggest that the 94-kDa protein is the signal transducer for sensory rhodopsin I. By [3H]retinal labeling studies, we previously identified a 25-kDa retinal-binding polypeptide that was derived from photochemically reactive sensory rhodopsin I. When H. halobium membranes containing sensory rhodopsin I were treated by a procedure that stably reduced [3H]retinal onto the 25-kDa apoprotein, a 94-kDa protein was also found to be radiolabeled. Protease digestion confirmed that the 94-kDa retinal-labeled protein was the same as the methyl-accepting protein that was suggested above to be the signal transducer for sensory rhodopsin I. Possible models are that the 25- and 94-kDa proteins are tightly interacting components of the photosensory signaling machinery or that both are forms of sensory rhodopsin I.     

Different modes of proton translocation by sensory rhodopsin I.

The membrane-bound complex between sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and its transducer HtrI forms the functional photoreceptor unit that allows transmission of light signals to the flagellar motor. Although being a photosensor, SRI, the mutant SRI-D76N and the HtrI-SRI complex can transport protons, as we demonstrate by using the sensitive and ion-specific black lipid membrane technique. SRI sustains an orange light-driven (one-photon-driven) outward proton transport which is enhanced by additional blue light (two-photon-driven). The vectoriality of the two-photon-driven transport could be reversed at neutral pH from the outward to the inward direction by switching the cut-off wavelength of the long wavelength light from 550 to 630 nm. The cut-off wavelength determining the reversal point decreases with decreasing pH. The currents could be enhanced by azide. A two-photon-driven inward proton transport by SRI-D76N (catalyzed by azide) and by the complex HtrI-SRI is demonstrated. The influence of pH and azide concentration on the rise and decay kinetics of the SRI380 intermediate is analyzed. The different modes of proton translocation of the SRI species are discussed on the basis of a general model of proton translocation of retinal proteins and in the context of signal transduction.     

Spectral tuning in sensory rhodopsin I from Salinibacter ruber

Organisms utilize light as energy sources and as signals. Rhodopsins, which have seven transmembrane α-helices with retinal covalently linked to a conserved Lys residue, are found in various organisms as distant in evolution as bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. One of the most notable properties of rhodopsin molecules is the large variation in their absorption spectrum. Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) function as photosensors and have similar properties (retinal composition, photocycle, structure, and function) except for their λ(max) (SRI, ～560 nm; SRII, ～500 nm). An expression system utilizing Escherichia coli and the high protein stability of a newly found SRI-like protein, SrSRI, enables studies of mutant proteins. To determine the residue contributing to the spectral shift from SRI to SRII, we constructed various SRI mutants, in which individual residues were substituted with the corresponding residues of SRII. Three such mutants of SrSRI showed a large spectral blue-shift (>14 nm) without a large alteration of their retinal composition. Two of them, A136Y and A200T, are newly discovered color tuning residues. In the triple mutant, the λ(max) was 525 nm. The inverse mutation of SRII (F134H/Y139A/T204A) generated a spectral-shifted SRII toward longer wavelengths, although the effect is smaller than in the case of SRI, which is probably due to the lack of anion binding in the SRII mutant. Thus, half of the spectral shift from SRI to SRII could be explained by only those three residues taking into account the effect of Cl(-) binding.     

Primary structure of sensory rhodopsin I, a prokaryotic photoreceptor.

The gene coding for sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) has been identified in a restriction fragment of genomic DNA from the Halobacterium halobium strain L33. Of the 1014 nucleotides whose sequence was determined, 720 belong to the structural gene of SR-I. In the 5' non-coding region two putative promoter elements and a ribosomal binding site have been identified. The 3' flanking region bears a potential terminator structure. The SR-I protein moiety carries no signal peptide and is not processed at its N terminus. The C terminus, however, lacks the last aspartic acid residue encoded by the gene. Analysis of the primary structure of SR-I reveals no consistent homology with the eukaryotic photoreceptor rhodopsin, but 14% homology with the halobacterial ion pumps, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and halorhodopsin (HR). Residues conserved in all three proteins are discussed with respect to their contribution to secondary structure, retinal binding and ion translocation. The aspartic acid residue which mediates in BR the reprotonation of the Schiff base (D96) is replaced in SR-I by a tyrosine (Y87). This amino acid replacement is proposed to be of crucial importance in the evolution of the slow-cycling photosensing pigment SR-I.     

Functional expression of His-tagged sensory rhodopsin I in Escherichia coli

Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) from Halobacterium salinarum was functionally expressed in Escherichia coli and subsequently purified to homogeneity using a C-terminal His-tag anchor. Yields of 3-4 mg SRI/l cell culture can be obtained. The absorption and photocycle properties of SRI were similar if not indistinguishable from those of the homologously expressed SRI. A global fit analysis of the photocycle data and the calculation of the spectra of states provided strong evidence for the existence of an N-like intermediate.     

Transducer protein HtrI controls proton movements in sensory rhodopsin I

Sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I lambda(max) 587 nm) is a phototaxis receptor in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. Photoisomerization of retinal in SR-I generates a long-lived intermediate with lambda(max) 373 nm which transmits a signal to the membrane-bound transducer protein HtrI. Although SR-I is structurally similar to the electrogenic proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR), early studies showed its photoreactions do not pump protons, nor result in membrane hyperpolarization. These studies used functionally active SR-I, that is, SR-I complexed with its transducer HtrI. Using recombinant DNA methods we have expressed SR-I protein containing mutations in ionizable residues near the protonated Schiff base, and studied wild-type and site-specifically mutated SR-I in the presence and absence of the transducer protein. UV-Vis kinetic absorption spectroscopy, FT-IR, and pH and membrane potential probes reveal transducer-free SR-I photoreactions result in vectorial proton translocation across the membrane in the same direction as that of BR. This proton pumping is suppressed by interaction with transducer which diverts the proton movements into an electroneutral path. A key step in this diversion is that transducer interaction raises the pK(a) of the aspartyl residue in SR-I (Asp76) which corresponds to the primary proton-accepting residue in the BR pump (Asp85). In transducer-free SR-I, our evidence indicates the pK(a) of Asp76 is 7.2, and ionized Asp76 functions as the Schiff base proton acceptor in the SR-I pump. In the SR-I/HtrI complex, the pK(a) of Asp76 is 8.5, and therefore at physiological pH (7.4) Asp76 is neutral. Protonation changes on Asp76 are clearly not required for signaling since the SR-I mutants D76N and D76A are active in phototaxis. The latent proton-translocation potential of SR-I may reflect the evolution of the SR-I sensory signaling mechanism from the proton pumping mechanism of BR.     

Conformational changes in sensory rhodopsin I: similarities and differences with bacteriorhodopsin, halorhodopsin, and rhodopsin

FTIR difference spectra have been obtained for the sR587----S373 phototransition of sensory rhodopsin I (sR-I), a signal-transducing protein of Halobacterium halobium. The vibrational modes of the sR587 chromophore have frequencies close to those of the bacteriorhodopsin bR568 chromophore, confirming that the two chromophores have very similar structures and environments. However, the sR-I Schiff base C = N stretch frequency is downshifted relative to bR, consistent with weaker hydrogen bonding with its counterion(s). The carboxyl (COOH) stretch modes of sR-I and halorhodopsin (hR) are at the same frequencies. On the basis of sequence homologies, these bands can be assigned to Asp-106 in helix D and/or Asp-201 in helix G. In contrast, no band was found that could be assigned to the protonation of Asp-76. In bR, the homologous residue Asp-85 serves as the acceptor group for the Schiff base proton. Bands appear in the amide I and II regions at similar frequencies in sR-I, hR, and bR, indicating that despite their different functions they all undergo closely related structural changes. Bands are also detected in the C-H stretch region, possibly due to alterations in the membrane lipids. Similar spectral features are also observed in the lipids of rhodopsin-containing photoreceptor membrane upon light activation.     

Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin: sensory rhodopsin I-like protein from a eubacterium

Halobacterium salinarum sensory rhodopsin I (HsSRI), a dual receptor regulating both negative and positive phototaxis in haloarchaea, transmits light signals through changes in protein-protein interactions with its transducer, halobacterial transducer protein I (HtrI). Haloarchaea also have another sensor pigment, sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), which functions as a receptor regulating negative phototaxis. Compared with HsSRI, the signal relay mechanism of SRII is well characterized because SRII from Natronomonus pharaonis (NpSRII) is much more stable than HsSRI and HsSRII, especially in dilute salt solutions and is much more resistant to detergents. Two genes encoding SRI homologs were identified from the genome sequence of the eubacterium Salinibacter ruber. Those sequences are distantly related to HsSRI ( approximately 40% identity) and contain most of the amino acid residues identified as necessary for its function. To determine whether those genes encode functional protein(s), we cloned and expressed them in Escherichia coli. One of them (SrSRI) was expressed well as a recombinant protein having all-trans retinal as a chromophore. UV-Vis, low-temperature UV-Vis, pH-titration, and flash photolysis experiments revealed that the photochemical properties of SrSRI are similar to those of HsSRI. In addition to the expression system, the high stability of SrSRI makes it possible to prepare large amounts of protein and enables studies of mutant proteins that will allow new approaches to investigate the photosignaling process of SRI-HtrI.     

Effects of modifications of the retinal beta-ionone ring on archaebacterial sensory rhodopsin I.

Ring desmethyl and acyclic analogues of all-trans retinal were incorporated into the apoprotein of the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) in Halobacterium halobium membranes. All modified retinals generate SR-I analogue pigments which exhibit "opsin shifts," i.e., their absorption spectra are shifted to longer wavelengths compared with model protonated Schiff bases of the same analogues. Each SR-I pigment analogue exhibits cyclic photochemical reactions as monitored by flash spectroscopy, but the analogue photocycles differ from that of native SR-I by exhibiting pronounced biphasic recovery of flash-induced absorption changes and abnormal flash-induced absorption difference spectra. Despite perturbations in the photochemical properties, the SR-I pigment analogues are capable of both attractant (single photon) and repellent (two photon) phototaxis signaling in cells. Our interpretation is that the hydrophobic ring substituents interact with the binding pocket to maintain the correct configuration for native SR-I absorption and photochemistry, but these interactions are not essential for the physiological function of SR-I as a dual attractant/repellent phototaxis receptor. These results support the conclusion emerging from several studies that the photoactivation process that triggers the conformation changes of SR-I and the related proton pump bacteriorhodopsin is conserved despite the different biological functions of their photoactivation.     

Time-resolved absorption and photothermal measurements with sensory rhodopsin I from Halobacterium salinarum

An expansion accompanying the formation of the first intermediate in the photocycle of transducer-free sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) was determined by means of time-resolved laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy. For the native protein (SRI-WT), the absolute value of the expansion is approximately 5.5 mL and for the mutant SRI-D76N, approximately 1.5 mL per mol of phototransformed species (in 0.5 M NaCl), calculated by using the formation quantum yield for the first intermediate (S610) of Phi610 = 0.4 +/- 0.05 for SRI-WT and 0.5 +/- 0.05 for SRI-D76N, measured by laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy and by laser flash photolysis. The similarity in Phi610 and in the determined value of the energy level of S610, E610 = (142 +/- 12) kJ/mol for SRI-WT and SRI-D76N indicates that Asp76 is not directly involved in the first step of the phototransformation. The increase with pH of the magnitude of the structural volume change for the formation of S610 in SRI-WT and in SRI-D76N upon excitation with 580 nm indicates also that amino acids other than Asp76, and other than those related to the Schiff base, are involved in the process. The difference in structural volume changes as well as differences in the activation parameters for the S610 decay should be attributed to differences in the rigidity of the cavity surrounding the chromophore. Except for the decay of the first intermediate, which is faster than in the SRI-transducer complex, the rate constants of the photocycle for transducer-free SRI in detergent suspension are strongly retarded with respect to wild-type membranes (this comparison should be done with great care because the preparation of both samples is very different).     

Circular dichroism of halorhodopsin: comparison with bacteriorhodopsin and sensory rhodopsin I

Circular dichroic (CD) spectra of three related protein pigments from Halobacterium halobium, halorhodopsin (HR), bacteriorhodopsin (BR), and sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I), are compared. In native membranes the two light-driven ion pumps, HR and BR, exhibit bilobe circular dichroism spectra characteristic of exciton splitting in the region of retinal absorption, while the phototaxis receptor, SR-I, exhibits a single positive band centered at the SR-I absorbance maximum. This indicates specific aggregation of protein monomers of HR, as previously noted [Sugiyama, Y., & Mukohata, Y. (1984) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 96, 413-420], similar to the well-characterized retinal/retinal exciton interaction in the purple membrane. The absence of this interaction in SR-I indicates SR-I is present in the native membrane as monomers or that interactions between the retinal chromophores are weak due to chromophore orientation or separation. Solubilization of HR and BR with nondenaturing detergents eliminates the exciton coupling, and the resulting CD spectra share similar features in all spectral regions from 250 to 700 nm. Schiff-base deprotonation of both BR and HR yields positive CD bands near 410 nm and shows similar fine structure in both pigments. Removal of detergent restores the HR native spectrum. HR differs from BR in that circular dichroic bands corresponding to both amino acid and retinal environments are much more sensitive to external salt concentration and pH. A theoretical analysis of the exciton spectra of HR and BR that provides a range of interchromophore distances and orientations is performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

His166 is critical for active-site proton transfer and phototaxis signaling by sensory rhodopsin I.

Photoinduced deprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base in the sensory rhodopsin I transducer (SRI-Htrl) complex results in formation of the phototaxis signaling state S373. Here we report identification of a residue, His166, critical to this process, as well as to reprotonation of the Schiff base during the recovery phase of the SRI photocycle. Each of the residue substitutions A, D, G, L, S, V, or Y at position 166 reduces the flash yield of S373, to values ranging from 2% of wild type for H166Y to 23% for H166V. The yield of S373 is restored to wild-type levels in Htrl-free H166L by alkaline deprotonation of Asp76, a Schiff base proton acceptor normally not ionized in the SRI-Htrl complex, showing that proton transfer from the Schiff base in H166L occurs when an acceptor is made available. The flash yield and rate of decay of S373 of the mutants are pH dependent, even when complexed with Htrl, which confers pH insensitivity to wild-type SRI, suggesting that partial disruption of the complex has occurred. The rates of S373 reprotonation at neutral pH are also prolonged in all H166X mutants, with half-times from 5 s to 160 s (wild type, 1 s). All mutations of His166 tested disrupt phototaxis signaling. No response (H166D, H166L), dramatically reduced responses (H166V), or inverted responses to orange light (H166A, H166G, H166S, and H166Y) or to both orange and near-UV light (H166Y) are observed. Our conclusions are that His166 1) plays a role in the pathways of proton transfer both to and from the Schiff base in the SRI-Htrl complex, either as a structurally important residue or possibly as a participant in proton transfers; 2) is involved in the modulation of SRI photoreaction kinetics by Htrl; and 3) is important in phototaxis signaling. Consistent with the involvement of the His imidazole moiety, the addition of 10 mM imidazole to membrane suspensions containing H166A receptors accelerates S373 decay 10-fold at neutral pH, and a negligible effect is seen on wild-type SRI.     

Deletion mapping of the sites on the HtrI transducer for sensory rhodopsin I interaction.

The phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) transmits signals through a membrane-bound transducer protein, HtrI. The genes for the receptor and transducer, sopI and htrI, respectively, are normally cotranscribed; however, previous work has established that fully functional interacting proteins are produced when htrI is expressed from the chromosome and sopI is expressed from a different promoter on a plasmid. In this report we show that in the membrane, concentrations of SRI from plasmid expression of wild-type sopI are negligible in the absence of HtrI protein in the cell. This requirement for HtrI is eliminated when sopI is extended at the 5'-end with 63 nucleotides of the bop gene, which encodes the N-terminal signal sequence of the bacteriorhodopsin protein. The signal is cleaved from the chimeric protein, and processed SRI is stable in the HtrI-free membrane. These results suggest a chaperone-like function for HtrI that facilitates membrane insertion or proper folding of the SRI protein. Six deletion constructs of HtrI were examined to localize the interaction sites for its putative chaperone function and for HtrI control of the SRI photocycle, a phenomenon described previously. The smallest HtrI fragment identified, which contained interaction sites for both SRI stability and photocycle control, consisted of the N-terminal 147 residues of the 536-residue HtrI protein. The active fragment is predicted to contain two transmembrane helices and the first approximately 20% of the cytoplasmic portion of the protein.     

Structure of the retinal chromophore in sensory rhodopsin I from resonance Raman spectroscopy

Sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) is a retinal-containing pigment which functions as a phototaxis receptor in Halobacterium halobium. We have obtained resonance Raman vibrational spectra of the native membrane-bound form of SR587 and used these data to determine the structure of its retinal prosthetic group. The similar frequencies and intensities of the skeletal fingerprint modes in SR587, bacteriorhodopsin (BR568), and halorhodopsin (HR578) as well as the position of the dideuterio rocking mode when SR-I is regenerated with 12,14-D2 retinal (915 cm-1) demonstrate that the retinal chromophore has an all-trans configuration. The shift of the C = N stretching mode from 1628 cm-1 in H2O to 1620 cm-1 in D2O demonstrates that the chromophore in SR587 is bound to the protein by a protonated Schiff base linkage. The small shift of the 1195 cm-1 C14-C15 stretching mode in D2O establishes that the protonated Schiff base bond has an anti configuration. The low value of the Schiff base stretching frequency together with its small 8 cm-1 shift in D2O indicates that the Schiff base proton is weakly hydrogen bonded to its protein counterion. This suggests that the red shift in the absorption maximum of SR-I (587 nm) compared with HR (578 nm) and BR (568 nm) is due to a reduction of the electrostatic interaction between the protonated Schiff base group and its protein counterion.     

Molecular mechanism of spectral tuning in sensory rhodopsin II.

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) is unique among the archaeal rhodopsins in having an absorption maximum near 500 nm, blue shifted roughly 70 nm from the other pigments. In addition, SRII displays vibronic structure in the lambda(max) absorption band, whereas the other pigments display fully broadened band maxima. The molecular origins responsible for both photophysical properties are examined here with reference to the 2.4 A crystal structure of sensory rhodopsin II (NpSRII) from Natronobacterium pharaonis. We use semiempirical molecular orbital theory (MOZYME) to optimize the chromophore within the chromophore binding site, and MNDO-PSDCI molecular orbital theory to calculate the spectroscopic properties. The entire first shell of the chromophore binding site is included in the MNDO-PSDCI SCF calculation, and full single and double configuration interaction is included for the chromophore pi-system. Through a comparison of corresponding calculations on the 1.55 A crystal structure of bacteriorhodopsin (bR), we identify the principal molecular mechanisms, and residues, responsible for the spectral blue shift in NpSRII. We conclude that the major source of the blue shift is associated with the significantly different positions of Arg-72 (Arg-82 in bR) in the two proteins. In NpSRII, this side chain has moved away from the chromophore Schiff base nitrogen and closer to the beta-ionylidene ring. This shift in position transfers this positively charged residue from a region of chromophore destabilization in bR to a region of chromophore stabilization in NpSRII, and is responsible for roughly half of the blue shift. Other important contributors include Asp-201, Thr-204, Tyr-174, Trp-76, and W402, the water molecule hydrogen bonded to the Schiff base proton. The W402 contribution, however, is a secondary effect that can be traced to the transposition of Arg-72. Indeed, secondary interactions among the residues contribute significantly to the properties of the binding site. We attribute the increased vibronic structure in NpSRII to the loss of Arg-72 dynamic inhomogeneity, and an increase in the intensity of the second excited (1)A(g)(-) -like state, which now appears as a separate feature within the lambda(max) band profile. The strongly allowed (1)B(u)(+)-like state and the higher-energy (1)A(g)(-) -like state are highly mixed in NpSRII, and the latter state borrows intensity from the former to achieve an observable oscillator strength.     

Chromophore of sensory rhodopsin II from Halobacterium halobium.

The photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin II (sR-II) was enriched 120-fold from cell membranes of Halobacterium halobium. The final preparation yields sR-II with a specific content of 3 nmol of sR-II/mg of protein. The spectroscopic measurements were performed on the enriched photoreceptor solubilized in digitonin. In the absolute absorption spectrum of the partially purified receptor, the main peak in the visible range corresponded to sR-II with a maximum at 488 nm. Cytochromes contributed to the spectrum only in a minor band at 415 nm. The extinction coefficient of sR-II was estimated from difference spectra during bleaching with hydroxylamine to be 48,000 M-1 cm-1. The reduced chromophore displayed a pronounced fine structure which is due to the coplanarity of the retinyl residue. The isomeric composition of the chromophore from the enriched photoreceptor was determined in retinal extracts in HPLC. The dark-adapted sR-II contains 80% all-trans- and 20% 13-cis-retinal. After illumination, the ratio changed to 1:1, indicating a trans-cis isomerization during the photocycle of sR-II.     

Demonstration of a sensory rhodopsin in eubacteria

We report the first sensory rhodopsin observed in the eubacterial domain, a green light-activated photoreceptor in Anabaena (Nostoc) sp. PCC7120, a freshwater cyanobacterium. The gene encoding the membrane opsin protein of 261 residues (26 kDa) and a smaller gene encoding a soluble protein of 125 residues (14 kDa) are under the same promoter in a single operon. The opsin expressed heterologously in Escherichia coli membranes bound all-trans retinal to form a pink pigment (lambda max 543 nm) with a photochemical reaction cycle of 110 ms half-life (pH 6.8, 18 degrees C). Co-expression with the 14 kDa protein increased the rate of the photocycle, indicating physical interaction with the membrane-embedded rhodopsin, which we confirmed in vitro by affinity enrichment chromatography and Biacore interaction. The pigment lacks the proton donor carboxylate residue in helix C conserved in known retinylidene proton pumps and did not exhibit detectable proton ejection activity. We detected retinal binding to the protein in Anabaena membranes by SDS-PAGE and autofluorography of 3H-labelled all-trans retinal of reduced membranes from the organism. We conclude that Anabaena rhodopsin functions as a photosensory receptor in its natural environment, and suggest that the soluble 14 kDa protein transduces a signal from the receptor. Therefore, unlike the archaeal sensory rhodopsins, which transmit signals by transmembrane helix-helix interactions with membrane-embedded transducers, the Anabaena sensory rhodopsin may signal through a soluble cytoplasmic protein, analogous to higher animal visual pigments.     

Identification of distinct domains for signaling and receptor interaction of the sensory rhodopsin I transducer, HtrI.

The phototaxis-deficient mutant of Halobacterium salinarium, Pho81, lacks both sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) and its putative transducer protein HtrI, according to immunoblotting and spectroscopic criteria. From restriction analysis and selected DNA sequencing, we have determined that the SR-I- HtrI- phenotype results from an insertion of a 520-bp transposable element, ISH2, into the coding region of the SR-I apoprotein gene sopI and deletion of 11 kbp upstream of ISH2 including the first 164 bp of sopI and the entire htrI gene. SR-I and HtrI expression as well as full phototaxis sensitivity are restored by transformation with a halobacterial plasmid carrying the htrI-sopI gene pair and their upstream promoter region. An internal deletion of a portion of htrI encoding the putative methylation and signaling domains of HtrI (253 residues) prevents the restoration of phototaxis, providing further evidence for the role of HtrI as a transducer for SR-I. Analysis of flash-induced photochemical reactions of SR-I over a range of pH shows that the partially deleted HtrI maintains SR-I interactions sites responsible for modulation of the SR-I photocycle.     

Phototaxis of Halobacterium salinarium requires a signalling complex of sensory rhodopsin I and its methyl-accepting transducer HtrI.

Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) is a photoreceptor that mediates phototaxis in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. Receptor excitation is relayed to the motility system of the cell by the methyl-accepting transducer protein HtrI. In membranes prepared from cells that lack HtrI the absorbance difference maximum of SRI was shifted from 587 to 565 nm. The thermal decay of the metastable photocycle intermediate SRI373 was measured as time-dependent recovery of the absorbance at 590 nm. In the absence of HtrI the decay was slowed down by two orders of magnitude. When SRI was overproduced in cells that contained normal levels of HtrI, the decay of SRI373 was biexponential indicating two kinetically distinct species. Spectroscopic measurements on intact cells revealed the same effect of HtrI on SRI photocycling as found in isolated membranes. By transient exposure of membranes from wild-type cells to low ionic strength, the decay of SR373 was slowed to the same value found for untreated membranes in the absence of HtrI. In parallel, the absorbance difference maximum was shifted to 565 nm indicating that a physical interaction of HtrI and SRI had been irreversibly destroyed. Overproduction of SRI in the presence of wild-type amounts of HtrI did not increase the light sensitivity of the cells to orange light step down stimulation. It is concluded that SRI and HtrI form a stable complex in the cell membrane that signals to the flagellar motor and defines absorbance maximum, photocycling rate and photochemical efficiency of SRI.