Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Thigmomorphogenesis in Solanum lycopersicum: Morphological and biochemical responses in stem after mechanical stimulation

The activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants by environmental stimuli is one of the most universal biochemical stress responses known. In tomato plant, rubbing applied to a young internode inhibit elongation of the rubbed internode and his neighboring one. These morphological changes were correlated with an increase in lignification enzyme activities, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidases (POD), 24 hours after rubbing of the forth internode. Furthermore, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content was detected in the rubbed internode and the upper one. Taken together, our results suggest that decrease in rubbed internode length is a consequence of IAA oxidation, increases in enzyme activities (PAL, CAD and POD), and cell wall rigidification associated with induction of lignification process.Key words: Mechanical stimulation, PAL, CAD, POD, IAAIn their environment, plants are constantly submitted to several stimuli such as wind, rain and wounding. The growth response of plants to such stimuli was termed thigmomorphogenesis and was observed in a wide range of plants.^1–3 The most common thigmomorphogenetic response is a retardation of tissue elongation accompanied by an increase in thickness.⁴ The plant response to mechanical perturbation is mainly restricted to the young developing internode, since no influence can be detected when the internode has reached its final length.^5,6 These plant growth modifications, which characterize thigmomorphogenesis, are related to biochemical events associated with lignification process⁷ and ethylene production.^8,9In tomato plant the length of internodes 4 (N4) and 5 (N5) was measured 14 days after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in Figure 1 show that rubbing led to a significant reduction of elongation of the stressed internode (N4) (decrease of N4 length from 4.3 cm in the control plant to 2.9 in the rubbed one). This effect was not limited to the rubbed area but affected also the elongation of the neighboring internodes (N5) that were shorter in rubbed plants than in control ones.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Internode lengths of control and rubbed plants measured 14 day after mechanical stress applied to the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Results reported in Figure 2 show an increase in PAL activity in both internodes N4 and N5, 24 hours after mechanical stress application as compared with corresponding controls. CAD activity was also investigated in N4 and N5, 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results presented in Figure 3 show that mechanical stress application induces a strong increase of CAD activity in the rubbed internode N4 (5.3 nkatal μg-1 protein) with an approximately two-fold increase when compared to control tomato internodes (2.3 nkatal μg-1 protein). Further, CAD activity in N5 was also increased in the rubbed internode (5.538 nkatal μg-1 protein) as compared with the control one (3.256 nkatal μg-1 protein).Open in a separate windowFigure 2PAL activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Open in a separate windowFigure 3CAD activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Syringaldazine (S-POD) and gaïacol (G-POD) peroxidase activities were measured in tomato N4 and N5. Results reported in Figure 4 show an increase in soluble peroxidase activity with both substrates in the rubbed internode N4 as compared with control plant. Enhancement in peroxidase activities in N4 was more pronounced with gaïacol (80.7 U) as an electron donor than syringaldazine (33.8 U). Similar results were observed in internode 5 as compared with control one (Fig. 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4(A) Syringaldazine-POD (Syr-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars. (B) Gaiacol-POD (G-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.IAA was quantified in control and rubbed plant internodes 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in figure 5 show that in control sample and as expected, the content of IAA was found to be higher in the younger internode (N5) as compared to the older one (N4). Rubbing led to a significant decrease in IAA levels in N4 (5.06 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹) as compared with corresponding controls (7.27 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹). Similar results were observed in internode 5, where IAA content was reduced from 16.52 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in control internode to 12.35 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in the rubbed internode (Fig. 5).Open in a separate windowFigure 5IAA Level of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.The results reported here establish an evident correlation between growth limitation of the rubbed internode and their degree of lignification, the increase in lignification enzymes activities and auxin degradation after mechanical stress application.Auxin seems to be involved in thigmomorphogenesis.¹⁰ It was proposed that MIS (Mechanically-induced stress) has opposite effects on auxin levels in the two species studied to date, Phaseolus vulgaris¹⁰ and Bryonia dioica.^11,12 Auxin level as measured by bioassay, increased in Phaseolus vulgaris following rubbing of the stem.¹⁰ It was proposed that a build up of auxin may result from the reduced polar transport of IAA at the rubbed internode, causing a build up of IAA in the stem tissue. Exogenous IAA did not reverse the MIS inhibition of growth in Phaseolus vulgaris and high levels of IAA retarded growth in non-stressed plants.¹⁰ Thus, retardation of extension growth in Phaseolus vulgaris may have been caused by high levels of endogenous auxin and the increase in stem diameter by increased ethylene production.⁴ However, ethylene increases radial growth only if auxin is present.¹³Boyer¹¹ reported a decrease in auxinlike activity in Bryonia dioica following MIS and this was confirmed in the same species by Hofinger et al.¹² who reported a decrease in IAA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Auxin catabolism was accompanied with changes in both soluble and ionically bound cell wall basic peroxidases¹⁴ and the appearance of an additional peroxidase. This can suggest that in Bryonia, auxin catabolism is hastened by mechanical stimulated peroxidase. In addition, Boyer et al.¹⁵ reported that lithium pre-treatment prevents both thigmomorphogenesis and appearance of specific cathodic isoperoxidase in Bryonia plants subjected to MIS. This is give further credence to the possibility that the peroxidase-auxin system is involved in Bryonia thigmomorphogenesis. In addition, ethylene increases peroxidase activity which reduces the auxin content in the tissue to a level low enough not to support normal growth. We have evidence that decrease of auxin level contribute to mechanism leading to tomato internode inhibition subjected to mechanical stress.Growth inhibition has been suggested to be the result of tissues lignification.⁶ As the initial enzyme in the monolignol biosynthesis pathway, PAL has a direct influence on lignin accumulation.¹⁶ The characteristics of lignin differ among cell wall tissues and plant organs.¹⁷ It comprises polyphenolic polymers derived from the oxidative polymerization of different monolignols, including p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols via a side pathway of phenylalanine metabolism leading to lignin synthesis.¹⁸ The increase in lignin content in the rubbed tomato internode could be a response mechanism to mechanical damage caused by rubbing.³ It is known that plants create a natural barrier that includes lignin and suberin synthesis, components directly linked to support systems.^19,20The increase in lignin content of rubbed tomato internode³ is paralleled by a rise in CAD activity and whilst such direct proportionality between CAD activity and lignin accumulation does not always agree with the results in the literature, it clearly is responding in ways similar to those of the other enzymes in the pathway.²¹Mechanical stress-induced membrane depolarization would generate different species of free radicals and peroxides, which in turn initiate lipid peroxidation.²² The degradation of cell membranes is suggested to bring about rapid changes in ionic flux, especially release of K⁺ which would result in an enhanced endogenous Ca/K ratio and in leakage of solutes, among them electron donors such as ascorbic acid and phenolic substances. The increased intracellular relative calcium level activated secretion of basic peroxidases²³ into the free space where, in association with the electron donors and may be with the circulating IAA, they eliminate the peroxides, and facilitated binding of basic peroxidases to membrane structures allowing a role as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-oxidases. The resulting IAA and ACC oxidase-mediated changes in ethylene production²⁴ would further induce (this time through the protein synthesis machinery) an increase in activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidases. The resulting lignification and cell wall rigidification determines the growth response of tomato internode to the mechanical stress.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Dynamic protein trafficking to the cell wall

Recently we have studied the secretion pattern of a pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) and a polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) in tobacco protoplast using the protein fusions, secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP. Both chimeras reach the cell wall by passing through the endomembrane system but using distinct mechanisms and through a pathway distinguishable from the default sorting of a secreted GFP. After reaching the apoplast, sec-GFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP undergoes endocytic trafficking. Here we describe the final localization of PGIP2-GFP in the vacuole, evidenced by co-localization with the marker Aleu-RFP, and show a graphic elaboration of its sorting pattern. A working model taking into consideration the presence of a regulated apoplast-targeted secretion pathway is proposed.Key words: cell wall trafficking, endocytosis, GPI-anchor, PGIP2, PMEI1, secretion pathway, vacuole fluorescent markerCell wall biogenesis, growth, differentiation and remodeling, as well as wall-related signaling and defense responses depend on the functionality of the secretory pathway. Matrix polysaccharides, synthesized in the Golgi stacks, and cell wall proteins, synthesized in the ER, are packaged into secretory vesicles that fuse with the plasma membrane (PM) releasing their cargo into the cell wall. Also the synthesis and deposition of cellulose itself are driven by the endomembrane system which controls the assembly, within the Golgi, and the export to the plasma membrane of rosette complexes of cellulose synthase.¹ Secretion to the cell wall has always been considered a default pathway² but recent studies have evidenced a complex regulation of wall component trafficking that does not seem to follow the default secretion model. Recent evidence that several cell wall proteins are retained in the Golgi stacks until specific signals at the N-terminal domain are proteolitically removed is a case in point.^3–5 Moreover, it has previously been reported that secretion of exogenous marker proteins (secGFP and secRGUS) and cell wall polysaccharides reach the PM through different pathways.⁶ More recently, we have reported that cell wall protein trafficking also occurs through mechanisms distinguishable from that of a secreted GFP suggesting that more complex events than the mechanisms of bulk flow control cell wall growth and differentiation.⁷ To follow cell wall protein trafficking we used a Phaseolus vulgaris polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) and an Arabidopsis pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) fused to GFP (PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1). Both apoplastic proteins are involved in the remodeling of pectin network with different mechanisms. PGIP2 specifically inhibits exogenous fungal polygalacturonases (PGs) and is involved in the plant defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi.^8,9 PMEI1 counteracts endogenous PME and takes part in the physiological synthesis and remodeling of the cell wall during growth and differentiation.^10,11 The specific functions of the two apoplastic proteins seem to be strictly related to the distinct mechanisms that control their secretion and stability in the cell wall. In fact, while secGFP-PMEI1 moves through ER and Golgi stacks linked to a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor, PGIP2-GFP moves as a cargo soluble protein. Furthermore, secGFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP, over the time, is internalized into endosomes and targeted to vacuole, likely for degradation. After reaching the cell wall, the different fate of the two proteins seems to be strictly related to the presence/absence of their physiological counteractors. PMEI regulates the demethylesterification of homogalacturonan by inhibiting pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity through the formation of a reversible 1:1 complex which is stable in the acidic cell wall environment.¹² Stable wall localization of PMEI1 is likely related to its interaction with endogenous PME, always present in the wall. Unlike PMEs, fungal polygalacturonases (PGs), the physiological interactors of PGIP2, are present in the cell wall only during a pathogen attack. The absence of PGs may determine PGIP2 internalization. Internalization events have been already reported for PM proteins,^13–16 while cell wall protein internalization is surely a less well-known event. To date, only internalization of an Arabidopsis pollen-specific PME^4,5,17 and PGIP2 ⁷ has been reported.To further confirm the internalization of PGIP2-GFP and its final localization into the vacuole, we constructed a red fluorescent variant (RFP) of the green fluorescent marker protein that accumulates in lytic or acidic vacuole because of the barley aleurain sorting determinants (Aleu-RFP).¹⁸ The localization of PGIP2-GFP was compared to that of Aleu-RFP by confocal microscopy in tobacco protoplasts transiently expressing both fusions. Sixty hours after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by complete co-localization with the vacuolar marker (Fig. 1A–D). Instead, at the same time point, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled the cell wall (Fig. 1E–H) and never reached the vacuolar compartment. To summarize PGIP2-GFP secretion pattern, a graphic elaboration of confocal images is reported describing the sorting of PGIP2GFP in tobacco protoplast (Fig. 1I). The protein transits through the endomembrane system (green) and reaches the cell wall which is rapidly regenerating as evidenced by immunostaining with the red monoclonal antibody JIM7 that binds to methylesterified pectins.¹⁹ PGIP2-GFP is then internalized in endosomes, labeled in yellow because of the co-localization with the styryl dye FM4-64, a red marker of the endocytic pathway.Open in a separate windowFigure 1PGIP2-GFP, but not secGFP-PMEI1, is internalized and reaches the vacuole in tobacco leaf protoplasts. (A) Approximately 60 h after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by co-localization with the vacuole marker Aleu-RFP (B). (C) Merged image of (A and B). (D) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of (A–C). On the contrary, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled cell wall (E). (F) No co-localization is present in the vacuole labeled by Aleu-RFP. (G) Merged image of (E and F). (H) DIC image of (E–G). (I) Graphic elaboration of confocal images describing the sorting of PGIP2. The protein is sorted by the endomembrane system (green) to the cell wall (red) that is regenerated by the protoplast. Lacking the specific ligand, it is then internalized in endosome (yellow). Details are reported in the text.In Figure 2 we propose a model of the mechanism of secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP secretion derived from the different lines of evidence previously reported in reference ⁷. SecGFPPMEI1 (Fig. 2-1), but not PGIP2-GFP (Fig. 2-2), carries a GPI-anchor, required for its secretion to the cell wall. When the anchorage of GPI is inhibited by mannosamine (Fig. 2-a) or by the fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PMEI1 (Fig. 2-b), the two non-anchored proteins accumulate in the Golgi stacks. Evidence of retention in Golgi stacks has already been reported for other two cell wall proteins.^3–5 Unlike secGFP-PMEI1, PGIP2-GFP is not stably accumulated in the cell wall and undergoes endocytic trafficking (Fig. 2-3). PGIP2-GFP internalization, likely due to the absence of PGs, might also be related with its ability to interact with homogalacturonan and oligogalacturonides,²⁰ which have been reported to internalize^21,22 (Fig. 2-4). Since SYP 121, a Qa-SNARE, is involved in the default secretion of secGFP,²³ but not in secretion of PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1, trafficking mechanisms underlying secretion into the apoplast are likely different from those underlying the default route (Figs. 2-5). Taken as a whole, evidence suggests the existence of currently undefined signals that control apoplast-targeted secretion.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic illustration for secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP trafficking. See text for details.     

ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Biphasic ethylene production during the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis: A window into defense priming mechanisms?

The hypersensitive response (HR) is a cell death phenomenon associated with localized resistance to pathogens. Biphasic patterns in the generation of H₂O₂, salicylic acid and ethylene have been observed in tobacco during the early stages of the HR. These biphasic models reflect an initial elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns followed by a second phase, induced by pathogen-encoded avirulence gene products. The first phase has been proposed to potentiate the second, to increase the efficacy of plant resistance to disease. This potentiation is comparable to the “priming” of plant defenses which is seen when plants display systemic resistance to disease. The events regulating the generation of the biphasic wave, or priming, remains obscure, however recently we demonstrated a key role for nitric oxide in this process in a HR occurring in tobacco. Here we use laser photoacoustic detection to demonstrate that biphasic ethylene production also occurs during a HR occurring in Arabidopsis. We suggest that ethylene emanation during the HR represents a ready means of visualising biphasic events during the HR and that exploiting the genomic resources offered by this model species will facilitate the development of a mechanistic understanding of potentiating/priming processes.Key words: hypersensitive response, biphasic patterns, potentiation, defense priming, ethylene, ArabidopsisThe Hypersensitive Response (HR) is a cell death process which occurs at the site of attempted pathogen attack and which has been associated with host resistance.¹ Much work on the regulation of the HR has indicated the importance of H₂O₂,² and NO.³ A feature of H₂O₂ generation during the HR is its biphasic pattern (Fig. 1A). The first rise reflects elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)⁴ and the second reflects the interaction between a pathogen-encoded avirulence (avr) gene product with a plant resistance (R) gene. A key aspect of the first rise is the initiation of salicylic acid (SA) synthesis which potentiates the second rise and hence the potency of plant defense and the HR.⁵Open in a separate windowFigure 1Patterns of defense signal generation during the Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited-hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Generation of (A) H₂O₂ (●, Mur¹⁸); (B) nitric oxide (◇; Mur¹² (C) salicylic acid (SA, ■¹⁹) and (D) ethylene (○ Mur⁹) during a HR elicited by Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psph) in tobacco cv. Samsun NN. In (A) a phase where SA acts to augment the second rise in H₂O₂—the potentiation phase—is highlighted. The potentiation phase is likely to be similar to defense “priming”.⁶ Methodological details are contained within the appropriate references. (E) A possible model for biphasic defense signal regulation during the Psph-elicited HR in tobacco. During an initial phase NO and H₂O₂ act to initiate SA biosynthesis, where SA and NO act to initiate a “H₂O₂ biphasic switch”. This could initially suppress both SA and the H₂O₂ generation but subsequently acts to potentiate a second phase of H₂O₂ generation. This in turn increases SA biosynthesis which could act with NO to initiate the “C₂H₄ biphasic switch” to potentiate ethylene production. These (and other) signals contribute to initiation of the HR and SAR.This potentiation mechanism appears to be similar to defense priming; when whole plants display systemic resistance to disease as opposed to a localized resistance against pathogens. Priming can be initiated (the “primary stimulus”) following attack with a necrotizing pathogen (leading to “systemic acquired resistance”, SAR) or non-pathogenic rhizosphere bacteria (to confer “induced systemic resistance”, ISR). In the primed state a plant stimulates a range of plant defense genes, produces anti-microbial phytoalexins and deposits cell wall strengthening molecules, but only on imposition of a “secondary stimulus”.⁶ Such secondary stimuli include SA³ or PAMPs⁷ and is likely to be mechanistically similar to the potentiation step in the biphasic pattern of H₂O₂ generation (shaded in Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the two phases in the biphasic wave represent primary and secondary stimuli in priming.Highlighting a similarity between local HR-based events and priming, adds further impetus to efforts aiming to describe the underlying mechanism(s), however both phenomena remain poorly understood. Besides SA, both jasmonates and abscisic acid (ABA) have been shown to prime defenses as have a range of non-plant chemicals, with β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) being perhaps most widely used.^6,8 Mutants which fail to exhibit BABA-mediated potentiation were defective in either a cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein, a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase or an ABA biosynthetic enzyme.⁸We have recently investigated biphasic ethylene production during the HR in tobacco elicited by the nonhost HR-eliciting bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola.⁹ As with H₂O₂ generation, this pattern reflected PAMP-and AVR-dependent elicitation events and included a SA-mediated potentiation stage. Crucially, we also showed that NO was a vital component in the SA-potentiation mechanism. When this finding is integrated with our other measurements of defense signal generation in the same host-pathogen system the complexity in the signaling network is revealed (Fig. 1). NO generation (Fig. 1B) appeared to be coincident with the first rise in H₂O₂ (Fig. 1A) which initiated SA biosynthesis^10,11 and together would contribute to the first small, but transient, rise in that hormone (Fig. 1C). In line with established models⁵ this momentary rise in SA coincides with the potentiation phase (shaded in Fig. 1A) required to augment the second rise in ROS. However, ethylene production seems to be correlated poorly with the patterns of NO, H₂O₂ and SA (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, biphasic ethylene production was found to reflect PAMP and AVR-dependent recognition and included a SA-mediated potentiation step.⁹ Hence, ethylene production could be used as a post-hoc indicator of the potentiation mechanism. Therefore, our discovery that the second wave of ethylene production—a “biphasic switch”—is influenced by NO acting with SA could also be relevant to the H₂O₂ generation. Significantly, the second phases in both H₂O₂ and ethylene production occur exactly where SA and NO production coincides; in the case of H₂O₂ generation 2–4 h post challenge and with ethylene 6 h onwards (Fig. 1E).Thus, ethylene production represents a readily assayable marker to indicate perturbations in the underlying biphasic and possible priming mechanisms. As we have demonstrated, laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD) is a powerful on-line approach to determine in planta ethylene production in tobacco^9,12 but any mechanistic investigations would be greatly facilitated if the genetic resources offered by the model species Arabidopsis could be exploited.To address this, Arabidopsis Col-0 rosettes were vacuum infiltrated with either Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) avrRpm1 (HR-eliciting), the virulent Pst strain and the non-HR eliciting and non-virulent Pst hrpA strain. Ethylene production was monitored by LAPD (Fig. 2A). Significantly, Pst avrRpm1 initiated a biphasic pattern of ethylene production whose kinetics were very similar to that seen in tobacco (compare Figs. 2A with ​with1D).1D). Inoculations with Pst and Pst hrpA only displayed the first PAMP-dependent rise in ethylene production. Thus, these data establish that Arabidopsis can be used to investigate biphasic switch mechanism(s) in ethylene production during the HR and possibly defense priming. When considering such mechanisms, it is relevant to highlight the work of Foschi et al.¹³ who observed that biphasic activation of a monomeric G protein to cause phase-specific activation of different kinase cascades. Interestingly, ethylene has been noted to initiate biphasic activation of G proteins and kinases in Arabidopsis, although differing in kinetics to the phases seen during the HR.¹⁴ Further, plant defense priming has been associated with the increased accumulation of MAP kinase protein.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ethylene in the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato elicited-hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Ethylene production from 5 week old short day (8 h light 100 µmol.m².sec⁻¹) grown Arabidopsis rosette leaves which were vacuum infiltrated with bacterial suspensions (2 × 10⁶ colony forming units.ml⁻¹) of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) strains detected using laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD). Experimental details of the ethylene detection by LAPD are detailed in Mur et al.⁹ The intercellular spaces in leaves were infiltrated with the HR-eliciting strain Pst avrRpm1, (■), the virulent strain Pst (△) or the non-virulent and non-HR eliciting derivative, Pst hrpA (◇). (B) The appearance of Arabidopsis Col-0 and etr1-1 leaves at various h following injection with 2 × 10⁶ c.f.u.mL⁻¹ with of Pst avrRpm1. (C) Explants (1 cm diameter discs) from Arabidopsis leaf areas infiltrated with suspensions of Pst avrRpm1 were placed in a 1.5 cm diameter well, bathed in 1 mL de-ionized H₂O. Changes in the conductivity of the bathing solution, as an indicator of electrolyte leakage from either wild type Col-0 (◆), mutants which were compromised in ethylene signaling; etr1-1 (□), ein2-2 (▲) or which overproduced ethylene; eto2-1 (●) were measured using a conductivity meter. Methodological details are set out in Mur et al.⁹A further point requires consideration; the role of ethylene as a direct contributor to plant defense.¹⁵ The contribution of ethylene to the HR has been disputed,¹⁶ but in tobacco we have observed that altered ethylene production influenced the formation of a P. syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited HR.⁹ In Arabidopsis, cell death in the ethylene receptor mutant etr1-1 following inoculation with Pst avrRpm1 is delayed compared to wild type (Fig. 2B). When electrolyte leakage was used to quantify Pst avrRpm1 cell death, both etr1-1 and the ethylene insensitive signaling mutant ein2-1 exhibited slower death than wild-type but in the ethylene overproducing mutant eto2, cell death was augmented (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that ethylene influences the kinetics of the HR.Taking these data together we suggest that the complexity of signal interaction during the HR or in SAR/ISR could be further dissected by combining the genetic resources of Arabidopsis with measurements of ethylene production using such sensitive approaches as LAPD.     

Co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts is a light-dependent reversible response

Co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts in plant cells has long been noticed as beneficial interactions of the organelles to active photosynthesis. Recently, we have found that mitochondria in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana expressing mitochondrion-targeted green fluorescent protein (GFP) change their distribution in a light-dependent manner. Mitochondria occupy the periclinal and anticlinal regions of palisade cells under weak and strong blue light, respectively. Redistributed mitochondria seem to be rendered static through co-localization with chloroplasts. Here we further demonstrated that distribution patterns of mitochondria, together with chloroplasts, returned back to those of dark-adapted state during dark incubation after blue-light illumination. Reversible association of the two organelles may underlie flexible adaptation of plants to environmental fluctuations.Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, blue light, chloroplast, green fluorescent protein, mesophyll cell, mitochondrion, organelle positioningHighly dynamic cell organelles, mitochondria, are responsible not only for energy production, but also for cellular metabolism, cell growth and survival as well as gene regulations.^1,2 Appropriate intracellular positioning and distribution of mitochondria contribute to proper organelle functions and are essential for cell signaling.^3,4 In plant cells operating photosynthesis, the co-localization of mitochondria with chloroplasts has been a well known phenomenon for a long period of time.^5,6,7 Physical contact of mitochondria with chloroplasts may provide a means to transfer genetic information from the organelle genome,⁸ as well as to exchange metabolite components; a process required for the maintenance of efficient photosynthesis.^9,10,11Using Arabidopsis thaliana stably expressing mitochondrion-targeted GFP,¹² we have recently examined a different aspect of mitochondria positioning. Although mitochondria in leaf mesophyll cells are highly motile under dark condition, mitochondria change their intracellular positions in response to light illumination.¹³ The pattern of light-dependent positioning of mitochondria seems to be essentially identical to that of chloroplasts.¹⁴ Mitochondria occupy the periclinal regions under weak blue light (wBL; 470 nm, 4 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹) and the anticlinal regions under strong blue light (sBL; 100 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹), respectively. A gradual increase in the number of static mitochondria located in the vicinity of chloroplasts in the periclinal regions with time period of wBL illumination clearly demonstrates that the co-localization of these two organelles is a light-induced phenomenon.¹³In the present study, to ask whether the light-dependent positioning of mitochondria is reversible or not, a time course of mitochondria redistribution was examined transferring the sample leaves from light to dark conditions. The representative results (Fig. 1) clearly show that mitochondria re-changed their positions within several hours of dark treatment. Immediately after dark adaptation, mitochondria in the palisade mesophyll cells were distributed randomly throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A and ^{ref. 13}). Chloroplasts were distributed along the inner periclinal walls and the lower half of the anticlinal walls. On the contrary, mitochondria accumulated along the outer (Fig. 1B) and inner periclinal walls when illuminated with wBL. Chloroplast position was also along the outer and inner periclinal walls. Many of the mitochondria located near the chloroplasts lost their motility. When wBL-illuminated leaves were transferred back to dark condition, the numbers of mitochondria and chloroplasts present on the periclinal regions began to decrease within several hours (Fig. 1C). After 10 h dark treatment, distribution patterns of mitochondria as well as chloroplasts almost recovered to those of dark-adapted cells (Fig. 1D).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of mitochondria and chloroplasts on the outer periclinal regions of palisade mesophyll cells of A. thaliana under different light conditions. Mitochondria (green; GFP) and chloroplasts (red; chlorophyll autofluorescence) were visualized with confocal microscopy after dark adaptation (A), immediately after wBL (470 nm, 4 µmol m⁻²s⁻¹) illumination for 4 h (B), after dark treatment for 6 h (C) and 10 h (D) following the 4-h wBL illumination, respectively. Bar = 50 µm.To our knowledge, this may be the first report that directly demonstrates that wBL regulates mitochondria and chloroplast positioning in a reversible manner, though the nuclei in A. thaliana leaf cells were also found to reverse their positions when transferred from sBL to dark conditions.¹⁵ Reversible regulation of organelle positioning in leaf cells should play critical roles in adaptation of plants to highly fluctuating light conditions in the nature. Since distribution patterns of mitochondria under wBL and sBL are identical to those of chloroplasts, we can assume that phototropins, the BL receptors for chloroplast photo-relocation movement,¹⁶ may have some role in the redistribution of mitochondria. On the other hand, we also found that red light exhibited a significant effect on mitochondria positioning (Islam et al. 2009), suggesting an involvement of photosynthesis. These possibilities are now under investigation.     

Arabidopsis glutathione reductase 1 is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol

We recently established a proteome methodology for Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes and identified more than 90 putative novel proteins of the organelle. These proteins included glutathione reductase isoform 1 (GR1), a major enzyme of the antioxidative defense system that was previously reported to be cytosolic. In this follow-up study, we validated the proteome data by analyzing the in vivo subcellular targeting of GR1 and the function of its C-terminal tripeptide, TNL>, as a putative novel peroxisome targeting signal type 1 (PTS1). The full-length protein was targeted to peroxisomes in onion epidermal cells when fused N-terminally with the reporter protein. The efficiency of peroxisome targeting, however, was weak upon expression from a strong promoter, consistent with the idea that the enzyme is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol in vivo. The reporter protein that was extended C-terminally by 10 amino acid residues of GR1 was directed to peroxisomes, characterizing TNL> as a novel PTS1. The data thus identify plant peroxisomal GR at the molecular level in the first plant species and complete the plant peroxisomal ascorbate-glutathione cycle. Moreover, GR1 is the first plant protein that is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol. The evolutionary origin and regulatory mechanisms of dual targeting are discussed.Key words: ascorbate-glutathione cycle, dual targeting, proteome analyses, reactive oxygen species, targeting signalsMassive amounts of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) are produced during photosynthesis in peroxisomes by glycolate oxidase activity as part of the photorespiratory cycle.¹ Next to catalase, the ascorbate-glutathione cycle is the secondary scavenging system for H₂O₂ detoxification.^2–4 The cycle comprises four enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase (GR). GR plays a major physiological role in maintaining and regenerating reduced glutathione in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants.⁵ Jiminez et al. (1997) provided biochemical evidence for the presence of the antioxidants ascorbate and glutathione and the enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in pea peroxisomes.^6–8 While Arabidopsis APX3, MDAR1 and MDAR4 have been characterized as peroxisomal isoforms,^9–11 the molecular identity of plant peroxisomal GR and DHAR have not been determined in any plant species to date.⁵ Arabidopsis encodes two GR and five DHAR isoforms that are either shown to be or predicted to be cytosolic, mitochondrial or plastidic.¹² We recently identified specific isoforms of GR (GR1, At3g24170) and DHAR (DHAR1, At1g19570) as being peroxisome-associated by proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes.^13,14 Both isoforms were previously reported to be or predicted to be cytosolic.¹⁵Arabidopsis GR1 terminates with TNL>, which is related to functional plant PTS1 tripeptides such as SNL> and ANL>.^16,17 Threonine (T), however, has not yet been described as an allowed residue at position −3 of PTS1s in any plant peroxisomal protein.¹⁶ Analysis of homologous plant proteins and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) shows that TNL> is generally highly conserved in putative plant GR1 orthologs (Fig. 1). A few other sequences terminate with related tripeptides, such TSL>, TTL>, NNL> and TKL>. Only a single EST (Picrorhiza kurrooa) carries the canonical PTS1, SKI> (Fig. 1). The data provide only weak additional support for peroxisome targeting of plant GR1 orthologs. However, GR homologs from green algae (chlorophyta) carry canonical PTS1 tripeptides, such as SKL> (Chlamydomonas, Volvox) and AKM> (Micromonas, Fig. 1, Suppl. Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Analysis of PTS1 conservation in plant GR1 homologs. Sequences of full-length protein (FLP) plant GR1 homologs or ESTs (“EST”) were identified by BLAST and phylogenetic analysis, aligned by ClustalX, and conserved residues were shaded by Genedoc. In addition to spermatophyta, homologs from bryophyta and chlorophyta were analyzed for PTS1 conservation. For a phylogenetic analysis of the full-length proteins, see also Supplementary Figure 1. The species abbreviations are as follows: Aa, Artemisia annua; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bn, Brassica napus; Br, Brassica rapa; Ci, Cichorium intybus; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Cs, Cynara scolymus; Fv, Fragaria vesca; Ha, Helianthus annuus; Msp, Micromonas sp. RCC 299; Mt, Medicago truncatula; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum; Os, Oryza sativa; Pk, Picrorhiza kurrooa; Ppat, Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens; Ps, Pisum sativum; Ptri, Populus trichocarpa; Rc, Ricinus communis; Rs, Raphanus sativus; Tp, Trifolium pratense; Tpus, Triphysaria pusilla; Vc, Volvox carteri f. nagariensis; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Zm, Zea mays.     

Brassinosteroid negatively regulates jasmonate inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis

Jasmonate (JA) inhibits root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. The mutation in COI1, that plays a central role in JA signaling, displays insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. To dissect JA signaling pathway, we recently isolated one mutant named psc1, which partially suppresses coi1 insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. As we identified the PSC1 gene as an allele of DWF4 that encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis, we hypothesized and demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. In our Plant Physiology paper, we analyzed effects of psc1 or exogenous BR on the inhibition of root growth by JA. Here we show that treatment with brassinazole (Brz), a BR biosynthesis inhibitor, increased JA sensitivity in both coi1-2 and wild type, which further confirms that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. Since effects of psc1, Brz and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, we suggests that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis.Key words: jasmonate signaling, root growth, brassinosteroid, brassinazole, arabidopsisJasmonate (JA) regulates many plant developmental processes and stress responses.^1,2 COI1 plays a central role in JA signaling and is required for all JA responses in Arabidopsis.^3,4 coi1-1, a strong mutation in COI1, is male sterile and exhibits loss of all JA responses tested to date, such as JA inhibition of root growth, the expression of JA-induced genes, and susceptibility to insect attack and pathogen infection, and coi1-2, a weak mutant of COI1, shows similar JA responses to coi1-1 except for partially fertile that makes it able to produce a small quantity of seeds.⁵To investigate COI1-mediated JA responses and dissect JA signaling pathway, we conducted genetic screens for suppressors of coi1-2. Previously, we identified cos1 that completely suppresses coil-2 insensitive to JA.⁶ Recently, we isolated the psc1 mutant that partially suppresses coi1-2 insensitivity to JA, and found that PSC1 is an allele of DWF4.⁷Since the DWF4 gene encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis,⁸ we hypothesized that BR is involved in JA signaling. By physiological analysis, we showed that psc1 partially restored JA inhibition of root growth in coi1-2 background and displayed JA hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background, the effects of psc1 were eliminated by exogenous BR, and that exogenous BR could attenuated JA inhibition of root growth in wild type. These findings demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and indicated that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.BR is a family of polyhydroxylated steroid hormones involved in many aspects of plant growth and development. The BR-deficient mutants exhibited severely retarded growth that was able to be rescued by exogenous BR.⁹ Brassinazole (Brz) is a BR biosynthesis inhibitor. The Arabidopsis seedlings treated with Brz displayed a BR deficient-mutant-like phenotype, which could be elimilated by exogenous BR.¹⁰To determine wether treatment with Brz affects JA inhibition of root growth, the seedlings of wild type and coi1-2 were grown in MS medium supplemented with MeJA and/or Brz. As shown in Figure 1, the relative root length was obviously reduced in both coi1-2 and wild type when treated with Brz relative to without Brz, indicating that the repression of BR biosynthesis by Brz could increase JA sensitivity. These results further confirm BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effect of Brz on JA inhibition of root growth. Brz increased JA inhibition of root growth in both coi1-2 and wild type (WT). Root length of 7-day-old seedlings grown in MS medium containing 0, 5 and 10 μM MeJA without (−) or with (+) 0.5 μM Brz was expressed as a percentage of root length in MS without (−) or with (+) 0.5 µM Brz. Error bars represent SE (n > 30).It has been demonstrated that JA connects with other plant hormones including auxin, ethylene, abscisic acid, salicylic acid and gibberellin to form complex regulatory networks modulating plant developmental and stress responses.^11–15 We found that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth, suggesting that a cross talk between JA and BR exists in planta, which extends our understandings on the JA signal transduction.COI1 is a JA receptor¹⁶ and DWF4 catalyzes the rate-limiting step in BR-biosynthesis pathway.⁸ We found that JA inhibits DWF4 expression, this inhibition was dependent on COI1,⁷ indicating that DWF4 is downregulated by JA and is located downstream of COI1 in the JA signaling pathway.Since the effects of psc1, Brz, and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, and the DWF4 expression was partially repressed by JA (Ren et al. 2009, Fig. 1), we suggest that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth, and propose a model for these regulations. As shown in Figure 2A, JA signal passes COI1 repressing substrates, such as JAZs,^17,18 i.e., JA activates degradation of substrates via SCF^COI1-26S proteasome,^16–18 whereas substrates positively regulate root growth through other regulators. JA also partially inhibits DWF4 expression through COI1, reducing BR that is required for root growth.^7,9 Mutation in COI1 interrupts JA signaling for failing in degradation of substrates and repression of DWF4 as well, resulting in JA-insensitivity (Fig. 2B). However, mutation in DWF4 or treatment with Brz causes a reduction in BR, which affects root growth, leading to JA-hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background (Fig. 2C and E) and partial restoration of JA sensitivity in coi1-2 background (Fig. 2D and F). Whereas, an application of exogenous BR could eliminate the effect of BR reduction resulted from repression of DWF4 by JA on root growth, attenuating JA sensitivity in wild type (Fig. 2G). Because the inhibition of DWF4 expression by JA is dependent on COI1, the coi1 mutant treated with exogenous BR do not show alteration in JA sensitivity (Fig. 2H).Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model for that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis. (A–D) Treatment with JA in wild type (A), coi1-2 (B), psc1 (C) and psc1coi1 (D). (E and F) Treatments with JA and Brz in wild type (E) and coi1-2 (F). (G and H) Treatments with JA and exogenous BR in wild type (G) and coi1-2 (H). Arrows indicate positive regulation or enhancement, whereas blunted lines indicate repression or negative regulation. Crosses indicate interruption or impairment. The letter “S” indicates substrates of SCF^COI1. Thicker arrows and blunted lines represent the central JA signaling pathway regulating JA inhibition of root growth. Broken arrows represent JA signaling pathway in which other regulators are involved. The intensity of gray boxes represents the degree of JA inhibition on root growth.     

Diversity in spindle morphology in Arabidopsis root tip

A primary function of the spindle apparatus is to segregate chromosomes into two equal sets in a dividing cell. It is unclear whether spindles in different cell types play additional roles in cellular regulation. As a first step in revealing new functions of spindles, we investigated spindle morphology in different cell types in Arabidopsis roots in the wild-type and the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant backgrounds. cyd1 provides cells larger than those of the wild type for testing the cell size effect on spindle morphology. Our observations indicate that cell type (shape), not cell size, is likely a factor affecting spindle morphology. At least three spindle types were observed, including small spindles with pointed poles in narrow cells, large barrel-shaped spindles (without pointed poles) in wide cells, and spindles intermediate in pole focus and size in other cells. We hypothesize that the cell-type-associated spindle diversity may be an integral part of the cell differentiation processes.Key words: spindle pole, microtubule, morphogenesis, cell type, metaphaseThe cellular apparatus for chromosome segregation during mitosis is typically described as a spindle composed of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Research on the structure and function of the spindle is usually conducted under the assumption that spindles are structurally the same or alike in different cell types in an organism. If the assumption is true, it would indicate that either the intracellular conditions in different dividing cells are very similar or the assembly and maintenance of the spindle are insensitive to otherwise variable intracellular conditions. But experimental evidence related to this assumption is relatively sparse.The root tip in Arabidopsis, as in other higher plants, contains dividing cells of different shapes and sizes. These cells include both meristem initial and derivative cells, with the former and latter being proximal and distal to the quiescent center, respectively.¹ The diversity in dividing cells in the root tip provides an opportunity for testing whether the spindles also exhibit diversity in morphology. To visualize the spindles at the metaphase stage in the root tip cells, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence labeling of the β-tubulin in single cells prepared from wild-type Arabidopsis (in Col-0 background) root tips as previously described in references ² and ³. The spindles in cells of different morphologies were then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope.³ Three types of spindle were detected. The first type (Fig. 1A) was the smallest in width and length and had the most-pointed poles among the three types. The second type (Fig. 1B) was wider and longer than the first type but with less-pointed poles than the first type. The third type (Fig. 1C) was similar in height to the second type but lacked the pointed poles. In fact, the third type is shaped more like a barrel than a spindle. The first type was found in cells narrow in the direction parallel to the equatorial plane of the spindle, a situation opposite to that of the third type whose cells were wide in the equatorial direction. The wide cells containing the barrel-shaped spindles likely belonged to the epidermal layer in the root tip.¹ The second type was found in cells intermediate in width. Examples of metaphase spindles morphologically resembling the three types of spindles in Arabidopsis root can also be found in a previous report by Xu et al. even although spindle diversity was not the subject of the report.⁴ In Xu et al.''s report, type 1- or 2-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 2B and 3A, and type 3-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 1A and 3B. These observations indicate that at least three types of spindles exist in the root cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Spindles in wild-type root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. (B) Type-2 spindle. (C) Type-3 spindle. The spots without fluorescence signals in the middle of the spindles are where the chromosomes were located. Scale bar for all the figures = 20 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Spindles in cyd1 root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. Arrows indicate the upper and lower boundaries of the cell. (B and C) Two type-2 spindles. (D and E) Two type-3 spindles. (F) DAPI-staining image corresponding to (E), showing chromosomes at the equatorial plane. Scale bar for the images = 20 µm.The above observations suggest that either the cell size or the cell type (shape) might be a factor in the type of spindle found in a specific cell. To further investigate the relationship between cell morphology and spindle morphology, we studied metaphase spindles in root cells of the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant.⁵ Because the root cells in cyd1 were larger than corresponding cells in the wild type, presumably due to abnormal polyploidization prior to the collection of the root cells,^5,6 this investigation might reveal a relationship between increasing cell size and altered spindle morphology. A pattern of different spindle types in different cell types similar to that in the wild type was observed in cyd1 (Fig. 2). Figures 2A–C show narrow cells that contained spindles with pointed poles even though the spindles differed in size and focus. Figure 2D shows a barrel-shaped spindle in a wide cell, resembling Figure 1C in overall appearance. The large number of chromosomes at metaphase (more than the diploid number of 10) in Figure 2F indicates that the cells in Figure 2 were polyploid. These figures thus demonstrate that the enlargement in cell size did not alter the pattern of types 1 and 2 spindles in narrow cells, as well as type 3 spindles in wide cells. Moreover, the edges of the spindles in Figure 2B and E were similarly distanced to the cell walls in the equatorial plane, and yet they differ greatly in shape with the former being type 2 and the latter being type 3. This finding argues against that the cell width in the equatorial direction dictates the spindle shape. On the other hand, the cells in Figure 2B and E are obviously of different types. Taken together, these observations suggest that the spindle diversity in both wild type and cyd1 is associated with cell-type diversity.It is unclear whether the different spindle types have different functions in their respective cell types, in addition to the usual role for chromosome segregation. One possibility is that, at the ensuing telophase, the pointed spindles result in compact chromosomal congregation at the poles whereas the barrel-shaped spindles result in loose chromosomal congregation at the poles, which in turn may differentially affect the shape of the subsequently formed daughter nuclei and their organization. Different nuclear shape and organization are likely to be integrated into the processes that confer cell differentiation.     

pH signature for the responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to external stimuli

Environmental and developmental signals can elicit differential activation of membrane proton (H⁺) fluxes as one of the primary responses of plant and fungal cells. In recent work,¹ we could determine that during the presymbiotic growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi specific domains of H⁺ flux are activated by clover root factors, namely host root exudates or whole root system. Consequently, activation on hyphal growth and branching were observed and the role of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase was investigated. The specific inhibitors differentially abolished most of hyphal H⁺ effluxes and fungal growth. As this enzyme can act in signal transduction pathways, we believe that spatial and temporal oscillations of the hyphal H⁺ fluxes could represent a pH signature for both early events of the AM symbiosis and fungal ontogeny.Key words: H⁺-specific vibrating probe, pH signatures, arbuscular mycorrhiza, pH signalling, Gigaspora margaritaThe 450-million-year-old symbiosis between the majority of land plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi is one of the most ancient, abundant and ecologically important symbiosis on Earth.^2,3The development of AM interaction starts before the physical contact between the host plant roots and the AM fungus. The hyphal growth and branching are induced by the root factors exudated by host plants, followed by the formation of appressorium leading to the hyphal penetration in the root system. These root factors seems to be specifically synthesized by host plants, since exudates from non-host plants are not able to promote neither hyphal differentiation nor appressorium formation.^4,5 Most root exudates contain several host signals or better, active compounds including flavonoids^6,19 and strigolactones,^7,8 however many of them are not yet known.Protons (H⁺) may have an important role on the fungal growth and host signal perception.¹ In plant and fungal cells, H⁺ can be pumped out through two different mechanisms: (1) the activity of the P-type plasma membrane (PM) H⁺-ATPase⁹ and (2) PM redox reactions.¹⁰ The proportional contribution from both mechanisms is not known, but in most plant cells the PM H⁺-ATPase seems to be the major responsible by the H⁺ efflux across plasma membrane. AM Fungal cells also energize their PM using P-type H⁺-pumps quite similar to the plant ones. Indeed, some genes codifying isoforms of P-type H⁺-ATPase have been isolated of AM fungi,^11–13 and AM fungal ATP hydrolysis activity was shown by cytochemistry, localized mainly in the first 70 µm from the germ tube tip.¹⁴ This structural evidence correlates with data obtained by H⁺-specific vibrating probe (Fig. 1A and B), which indicates that the H⁺ efflux in Gigaspora margarita is more intense in the subapical region of the lateral hyphae¹ (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the correlation between the cytosolic pH profile previously obtained by Jolicoeur et al.,¹⁵ with the H⁺ efflux pattern (erythrosine-dependent), seems to clearly indicate that an active PM H⁺-ATPase takes place at the subapical hyphal region. Using orthovanadate, we could show that those H⁺ effluxes are susceptible mainly in the subapical region, but no effect in the apical was found.¹ Recently, a method to use fluorescent marker expression in an AM fungus driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal promoters was published.³¹ It could be adjusted as an alternative to measure “in vivo” PM H⁺-ATPase expression in AM fungal hyphae and their responses to root factors.³¹Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) H⁺ flux profile along growing secondary hyphae of G. margarita in the presence (open squares) or absence (closed squares) of erythrosin B and its correlation with cytosolic pH (pHc) data described by Jolicoeur et al.,¹⁵ (dotted line). Dotted area depicts the region with higher susceptibility to erythrosin B. (B) ion-selective electrode near to AM fungal hyphae. (C) Stimulation on hyphal H⁺ efflux after incubation with root factors or whole root system. R, roots; RE, root exudates; CO₂, carbon dioxide; CWP, cell wall proteins; GR24, synthetic strigolactone. The medium pH in all treatment was monitored and remained about 5.7, including with prior CO₂ incubation. Means followed by the same letter are statistically equal by Duncan''s test at p < 5%.The H⁺ electrochemical gradient generated by PM H⁺-ATPases provides not only driving force for nutrient uptake,^9,16 but also can act as an intermediate in signal transduction pathways.¹⁸ The participation of these H⁺ pumps in cell polarity and tip growth of plant cells was recently reported,²⁷ addressing their crucial role on apical growth.²⁸ Naturally, in the absence of root factors the AM fungi have basal metabolic^8,21–23 and respiratory activity.²⁴ However when root signals are recognized and processed by AM fungal cells they might become activated.²² We thus searched for pH signatures that could reflect the alterations on fungal metabolism in response to external stimuli. In fact, preliminary analyses from our group demonstrate that AM fungal hyphae increase their H⁺ efflux in response not only to root exudates recognition, but also to other root factors (Fig. 1C). The incubation for 30 min of AM fungal hyphae with several root factors induces hyphal H⁺ efflux similar to the response to intact root system (5 days of incubation). The major increases were found with 1% CO₂ (750%) followed by root cell wall proteins (221%), root exudates (130%) and synthetic strigolactone (5%) (Fig. 1C). Those stimulations could define the transition from the state without root signals to the presymbiotic developmental stage (Fig. 1C). In the case of CO₂, the incorporation of additional carbon could represent a new source of energy, since CO₂ dark fixation takes place in Glomus intraradices germ tubes.^22,25Interestingly, after the treatment with synthetic strigolactone (10⁻⁵ M GR24), no significant stimulation was found compared to the remaining factors (Fig. 1C). It opens the question if the real effect of strigolactone is restrict to hyphal branching and does not intervene in very fast response pathways. Likewise, strigolactones need additional time to exhibit an effect, as recently discussed by Steinkellner et al.,²⁶ However, at the moment, no comprehensive electrophysiological analyses are presently available separating the effects of strigolactone and some flavonoids in AM fungal hyphae.The next target of our work is the study of ionic responses of single germ tubes or primary hyphae to root factors (Fig. 2). As reported by Ramos et al.,¹ we have been observing that the pattern of ion fluxes at the apical zone of primary hyphae is differentiated from secondary or lateral hyphae. In the primary, two interesting responses were detected in the absence of root factors: (1) a “dormant Ca²⁺ flux” and (2) Cl⁻ or anion fluxes at the same direction of H⁺ ions, suggesting a possible presence of H⁺/Cl⁻ symporters at the apex, similarly to what occurs in root hairs (Fig. 2).³⁰ In the presence of root factors such as root exudates the stimulated influxes of Cl⁻ (anion), H⁺, Na⁺ and effluxes of K⁺ and Ca²⁺ are activated. It can explain why the AM fungi hyphal tips are depolarized^20,29 during the period without root signals—“asymbiosis”—as long as K⁺ efflux and H⁺ influx occur simultaneously. Indeed, H⁺ as well as Ca²⁺ ions may act as second messengers, where extra and intracellular transient pH changes are preconditions for a number of processes, including gravity responses and possibly in plant-microbe interactions.^17,30Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ion dynamics in the apex of primary hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. It represents the Stage 1 described in Ramos et al.¹ After treatment with root factors, an activation of Ca²⁺ efflux is observed at the hyphal apex.Clearly, further data on the mechanism of action of signaling molecules such as strigolactones over the signal transduction and ion dynamics in AM fungi will be very important to improve our understanding of the molecular bases of the mycorrhization process. Future studies are necessary in order to provide basic knowledge of the ion signaling mechanisms and their role on the response of very important molecules playing at the early events of AM symbiosis.