The C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA does not bind DNA directly but regulates damage-specific DNA binding

In prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair, UvrA recognizes DNA perturbations and recruits UvrB for the recognition and processing steps in the reaction. One of the most remarkable aspects of UvrA is that it can recognize a wide range of DNA lesions that differ in chemistry and structure. However, how UvrA interacts with DNA is unknown. To examine the role that the UvrA C-terminal zinc finger domain plays in DNA binding, an eleven amino acid deletion was constructed (ZnG UvrA). Biochemical characterization of the ZnG UvrA protein was carried out using UvrABC DNA incision, DNA binding and ATPase assays. Although ZnG UvrA was able to bind dsDNA slightly better than wild-type UvrA, the ZnG UvrA mutant only supported 50-75% of wild type incision. Surprisingly, the ZnG UvrA mutant, while retaining its ability to bind dsDNA, did not support damage-specific binding. Furthermore, this mutant protein only provided 10% of wild-type Bca UvrA complementation for UV survival of an uvrA deletion strain. In addition, ZnG UvrA failed to stimulate the UvrB DNA damage-associated ATPase activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was used to monitor UvrB loading onto damaged DNA with wild-type UvrA or ZnG UvrA. The ZnG UvrA protein showed a 30-60% reduction in UvrB loading as compared with the amount of UvrB loaded by wild-type UvrA. These data demonstrate that the C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA is required for regulation of damage-specific DNA binding.     

Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli UvrA protein localizes domains for DNA binding, damage recognition, and protein-protein interactions.

The UvrA protein is the DNA binding and damage recognition subunit of the damage-specific UvrABC endonuclease. In addition, it is an ATPase/GTPase, and the binding energy of ATP is linked to dimerization of the UvrA protein. Furthermore, the UvrA protein interacts with the UvrB protein to modulate its activities, both in solution and in association with DNA, where the UvrAB complex possesses a helicase activity. The domains of the UvrA protein that sponsor each of these activities were localized within the protein by studying the in vitro properties of a set of purified deletion mutants of the UvrA protein. A region located within the first 230 amino acids was found to contain the minimal region necessary for interactions with UvrB, the UvrA dimerization interface was localized to within the first 680 amino acids, and the DNA binding domain lies within the first 900 amino acids of the 940-amino acid UvrA protein. Two damage recognition domains were detected. The first domain, which coincides with the DNA binding region, is required to detect the damage. The second domain, located on or near the C-terminal 40 amino acids, stabilizes the protein-DNA complex when damage is encountered.     

DNase I footprint of ABC excinuclease

The incision and excision steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli are mediated by ABC excinuclease, a multisubunit enzyme composed of three proteins, UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. To determine the DNA contact sites and the binding affinity of ABC excinuclease for damaged DNA, it is necessary to engineer a DNA fragment uniquely modified at one nucleotide. We have recently reported the construction of a 40 base pair (bp) DNA fragment containing a psoralen adduct at a central TpA sequence (Van Houten, B., Gamper, H., Hearst, J. E., and Sancar, A. (1986a) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14135-14141). Using similar methodology a 137-bp fragment containing a psoralen-thymine adduct was synthesized, and this substrate was used in DNase I-footprinting experiments with the subunits of ABC excinuclease. It was found that the UvrA subunit binds specifically to the psoralen modified 137-bp fragment with an apparent equilibrium constant of K8 = 0.7 - 1.5 X 10(8) M-1, while protecting a 33-bp region surrounding the DNA adduct. The equilibrium constant for the nonspecific binding of UvrA was Kns = 0.7 - 2.9 X 10(5) M-1 (bp). In the presence of the UvrB subunit, the binding affinity of UvrA for the damaged substrate increased to K8 = 1.2 - 6.7 X 10(8) M-1 while the footprint shrunk to 19 bp. In addition the binding of the UvrA and UvrB subunits to the damaged substrate caused the 11th phosphodiester bond 5' to the psoralen-modified thymine to become hypersensitive to DNase I cleavage. These observations provide evidence of an alteration in the DNA conformation which occurs during the formation of the ternary UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex. The addition of the UvrC subunit to the UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex resulted in incisions on both sides of the adduct but did not cause any detectable change in the footprint. Experiments with shorter psoralen-modified DNA fragments (20-40 bp) indicated that ABC excinuclease is capable of incising a DNA fragment extending either 3 or 1 bp beyond the normal 5' or 3' incision sites, respectively. These results suggest that the DNA beyond the incision sites, while contributing to ABC excinuclease-DNA complex formation, is not essential for cleavage to occur.     

Site-specific mutagenesis of conserved residues within Walker A and B sequences of Escherichia coli UvrA protein.

UvrA is the ATPase subunit of the DNA repair enzyme (A)BC excinuclease. The amino acid sequence of this protein has revealed, in addition to two zinc fingers, three pairs of nucleotide binding motifs each consisting of a Walker A and B sequence. We have conducted site-specific mutagenesis, ATPase kinetic analyses, and nucleotide binding equilibrium measurements to correlate these sequence motifs with activity. Replacement of the invariant Lys by Ala in the putative A sequences indicated that K37 and K646 but not K353 are involved in ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, substitution of the invariant Asp by Asn in the B sequences at positions D238, D513, or D857 had little effect on the in vivo activity of the protein. Nucleotide binding studies revealed a stoichiometry of 0.5 ADP/UvrA monomer while kinetic measurements on wild-type and mutant proteins showed that the active form of UvrA is a dimer with 2 catalytic sites which interact in a positive cooperative manner in the presence of ADP; mutagenesis of K37 but not of K646 attenuated this cooperativity. Loss of ATPase activity was about 75% in the K37A, 86% in the K646A mutant, and 95% in the K37A-K646A double mutant. These amino acid substitutions had only a marginal effect on the specific binding of UvrA to damaged DNA but drastically reduced its ability to deliver UvrB to the damage site. We find that the deficient UvrB loading activity of these mutant UvrA proteins results from their inability to associate with UvrB in the form of (UvrA)2(UvrB)1 complexes. We conclude that UvrA forms a dimer with two ATPase domains involving K37 and K646 and that the work performed by ATP hydrolysis is the delivery of UvrB to the damage site on DNA.     

Dynamics of the UvrABC nucleotide excision repair proteins analyzed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.     

UvrB domain 4, an autoinhibitory gate for regulation of DNA binding and ATPase activity

UvrB, a central DNA damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair, has weak affinity for DNA, and its ATPase activity is activated by UvrA and damaged DNA. Regulation of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis by UvrB is poorly understood. Using atomic force microscopy and biochemical assays, we found that truncation of domain 4 of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB (UvrBDelta4) leads to multiple changes in protein function. Protein dimerization decreases with an approximately 8-fold increase of the equilibrium dissociation constant and an increase in DNA binding. Loss of domain 4 causes the DNA binding mode of UvrB to change from dimer to monomer, and affinity increases with the apparent dissociation constants on nondamaged and damaged single-stranded DNA decreasing 22- and 14-fold, respectively. ATPase activity by UvrBDelta4 increases 14- and 9-fold with and without single-stranded DNA, respectively, and UvrBDelta4 supports UvrA-independent damage-specific incision by Cho on a bubble DNA substrate. We propose that other than its previously discovered role in regulating protein-protein interactions, domain 4 is an autoinhibitory domain regulating the DNA binding and ATPase activities of UvrB.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

Isolation and characterization of functional domains of UvrA.

The sequence of Escherichia coli UvrA protein suggests that it may fold into two functional domains each possessing DNA binding and ATPase activities. We have taken two approaches to physically isolate polypeptides corresponding to the two putative domains. First, a 180 base pair DNA segment encoding multiple collagenase recognition sequences was inserted into UvrA's putative interdomain hinge region. This UvrA derivative was purified and digested with collagenase, and the resulting 70-kDa N-terminal and 35-kDa C-terminal fragments were purified. Both fragments possessed nonspecific DNA binding activity, but only the N-terminal domain retained its nucleotide binding capacity as evidence by measurements of ATP hydrolysis and by ATP photo-cross-linking. Together, the two fragments failed to substitute for UvrA in reconstituting (A)BC excinuclease and, therefore, were presumed to be unable to load UvrB onto damaged DNA. Second, the DNA segments encoding the two domains were fused to the beta-galactosidase gene. The UvrA N-terminal domain-beta-galactosidase fusion protein was overproduced and purified. This fusion protein had ATPase activity, thus confirming that the amino-terminal domain does possess an intrinsic ATPase activity independent of any interaction with the carboxy terminus. Our results show that UvrA has two functional domains and that the specificity for binding to damaged DNA is provided by the proper three-dimensional orientation of one zinc finger motif relative to the other and is not an intrinsic property of an individual zinc finger domain.     

Role of the insertion domain and the zinc-finger motif of Escherichia coli UvrA in damage recognition and ATP hydrolysis

UvrA is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each protomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase domains, that belong to the family of ATP-binding cassette domains. Three structural domains are inserted in these ATPase domains: the insertion domain (ID) and UvrB binding domain (in ATP domain I) and the zinc-finger motif (in ATP domain II). In this paper we analyze the function of the ID and the zinc finger motif in damage specific binding of Escherichia coli UvrA. We show that the ID is not essential for damage discrimination, but it does stabilize UvrA on the DNA, most likely by forming a clamp around the DNA helix. We present evidence that two conserved arginine residues in the ID contact the phosphate backbone of the DNA, leading to strand separation after the ATPase-driven movement of the ID's. Remarkably, deletion of the ID generated a phenotype in which UV-survival strongly depends on the presence of photolyase, indicating that UvrA and photolyase form a ternary complex on a CPD-lesion. The zinc-finger motif is shown to be important for the transfer of the damage recognition signal to the ATPase of UvrA. In the absence of this domain the coupling between DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis is completely lost. Mutation of the phenylalanine residue in the tip of the zinc-finger domain resulted in a protein in which the ATPase was already triggered when binding to an undamaged site. As the zinc-finger motif is connected to the DNA binding regions on the surface of UvrA, this strongly suggests that damage-specific binding to these regions results in a rearrangement of the zinc-finger motif, which in its turn activates the ATPase. We present a model how damage recognition is transmitted to activate ATP hydrolysis in ATP binding domain I of the protein.     

Role of the Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair proteins in DNA replication

DNA polymerase I (PolI) functions both in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and in the processing of Okazaki fragments that are generated on the lagging strand during DNA replication. Escherichia coli cells completely lacking the PolI enzyme are viable as long as they are grown on minimal medium. Here we show that viability is fully dependent on the presence of functional UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD (helicase II) proteins but does not require UvrC. In contrast, delta polA cells grow even better when the uvrC gene has been deleted. Apparently UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD are needed in a replication backup system that replaces the PolI function, and UvrC interferes with this alternative replication pathway. With specific mutants of UvrC we could show that the inhibitory effect of this protein is related to its catalytic activity that on damaged DNA is responsible for the 3' incision reaction. Specific mutants of UvrA and UvrB were also studied for their capacity to support the PolI-independent replication. Deletion of the UvrC-binding domain of UvrB resulted in a phenotype similar to that caused by deletion of the uvrC gene, showing that the inhibitory incision activity of UvrC is mediated via binding to UvrB. A mutation in the N-terminal zinc finger domain of UvrA does not affect NER in vivo or in vitro. The same mutation, however, does give inviability in combination with the delta polA mutation. Apparently the N-terminal zinc-binding domain of UvrA has specifically evolved for a function outside DNA repair. A model for the function of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD proteins in the alternative replication pathway is discussed.     

Amplification and purification of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli

The UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli are subunits of a DNA repair enzyme, ABC exci nuclease. In order to amplify these proteins, we have joined the artificial canonical promoter tac (Amann E., Brosius, J., and Ptashne, M. (1983) Gene (Amst.) 25, 167-178) to the uvr genes to obtain plasmids that express these genes under the control of the lac repressor. When cells carrying the tac-uvr plasmids are induced by the gratuitous lac inducer isopropyl-beta-D-galactoside the Uvr proteins are overproduced reaching a level of 10-20% of total cellular proteins after 6-8 h of induction. We have developed methods to purify all three Uvr proteins, UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC, in milligram quantities and to near homogeneity from these overproducing cells. The purified UvrA protein is an ATPase but UvrB and UvrC proteins are not. However, UvrB protein stimulates the ATPase activity of UvrA protein by a factor of 1.5 in the presence of double-stranded DNA and by a factor of about 2.6 in the presence of UV-irradiated DNA but not in the absence of DNA.     

Involvement of a cryptic ATPase activity of UvrB and its proteolysis product, UvrB* in DNA repair

The incision of damaged DNA by the Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease requires ATP hydrolysis. Although the deduced sequence of the UvrB protein suggests a putative ATP binding site, no nucleoside triphosphatase activity is demonstrable with the purified UvrB protein. The UvrB protein is specifically proteolyzed in E. coli cell extracts to yield a 70 kD fragment, referred to as UvrB*, which has been purified and is shown to possess a single-strand DNA dependent ATPase activity. Substrate specificity and kinetic analyses of UvrB* catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis indicate that the stimulation in DNA dependent ATPase activity following formation of the UvrAB complex results from the activation of the normally sequestered UvrB associated ATPase. Using nucleotide analogues, it can be shown that this activity is essential to the DNA incision reaction carried out by the UvrABC complex.     

The nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB, a helicase-like enzyme with a catch

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a universal DNA repair mechanism found in all three kingdoms of life. Its ability to repair a broad range of DNA lesions sets NER apart from other repair mechanisms. NER systems recognize the damaged DNA strand and cleave it 3', then 5' to the lesion. After the oligonucleotide containing the lesion is removed, repair synthesis fills the resulting gap. UvrB is the central component of bacterial NER. It is directly involved in distinguishing damaged from undamaged DNA and guides the DNA from recognition to repair synthesis. Recently solved structures of UvrB from different organisms represent the first high-resolution view into bacterial NER. The structures provide detailed insight into the domain architecture of UvrB and, through comparison, suggest possible domain movements. The structure of UvrB consists of five domains. Domains 1a and 3 bind ATP at the inter-domain interface and share high structural similarity to helicases of superfamilies I and II. Not related to helicase structures, domains 2 and 4 are involved in interactions with either UvrA or UvrC, whereas domain 1b was implicated for DNA binding. The structures indicate that ATP binding and hydrolysis is associated with domain motions. UvrB's ATPase activity, however, is not coupled to the separation of long DNA duplexes as in helicases, but rather leads to the formation of the preincision complex with the damaged DNA substrate. The location of conserved residues and structural comparisons with helicase-DNA structures suggest how UvrB might bind to DNA. A model of the UvrB-DNA interaction in which a beta-hairpin of UvrB inserts between the DNA double strand has been proposed recently. This padlock model is developed further to suggest two distinct consequences of domain motion: in the UvrA(2)B-DNA complex, domain motions lead to translocation along the DNA, whereas in the tight UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex, they lead to distortion of the 3' incision site.     

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA·UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a diverse set of lesions. In bacteria, the initial steps are carried out by three proteins: UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. The UvrA·UvrB complex conducts surveillance of DNA and recognizes damage. Having located a lesion, UvrA “loads” UvrB onto the DNA at the damaged sites and then dissociates. Damage searching, formation of the UvrB·DNA “preincision” complex, and dissociation of UvrA are regulated by ATP (1). UvrB subsequently recruits the endonuclease UvrC, which catalyzes incisions on either side of the lesion (2, 3). Following incision, UvrC and the damage-containing oligonucleotide are removed by UvrD (helicase II), whereas UvrB remains bound to the gapped DNA and recruits DNA polymerase I for repair synthesis. Sealing of the single-stranded nick completes the repair process and restores the original DNA sequence (4).Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, bacterial nucleotide excision repair has been extensively studied, resulting in a large body of work that describes the protein components and the details of how they operate. Notwithstanding the trove of genetic and biochemical data, several key questions remain unanswered. For example, how does the same set of proteins handle a diverse set of lesions while maintaining specificity? How do UvrA and UvrB cooperate during damage recognition, and what is the precise role of ATP? Ongoing studies in the field, including those described below, aim to address these issues.Recently, we reported the structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus UvrA and the identification of binding sites for DNA and UvrB (5). We also established that the identified UvrB-binding domain is necessary and sufficient to mediate the UvrA-UvrB interaction and that the isolated interaction domains of UvrA (5) and UvrB (6) bind to each other in solution.To understand the interaction between UvrA and UvrB, we have determined the crystal structure of the complex between the two isolated interaction domains. The structure revealed that UvrA-UvrB interaction interface is largely polar, mediated by several highly conserved charged residues. Site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the mutant proteins confirmed the importance of the observed interactions. Based on the interaction domain complex structure, we have constructed a structural model for the full-length UvrA·UvrB ensemble and propose two models for lesion recognition that will serve as a basis for future experiments.     

Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui: Development of a multiplex PCR assay for their detection and differentiation using specific primers derived from HAT-RAPD

Specific primers for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui were investigated by using the HAT-RAPD PCR method. Fourteen arbitrary primers (Operon Technologies) were performed for the generation of polymorphic DNA profiles. The results showed that a 319 bp fragment generated from the OPA-04 primer was expected to be O. viverrini-specific while a 256 bp fragment generated from the OPP-11 primer was considered to be H. taichui-specific. Based on each sequence data, two pairs of specific primers were designed and sequences of each primer were as follows; H. taichui; Hapt_F5′-GGCCAACGCAATCGTCATCC-3′and Hapt_R1 5′-CTCTCGACCTCCTCTAGAAT-3′ which yielded a 170 bp PCR product. For O. viverrini, OpV-1F: 5′-AATCGGGCTGCATATTGACCGAT-3′ and OpV-1R: 5′-CGGTGTTGCTTATTTTGCAGACAA-3′ which generated a 319 bp PCR product. These specific primers were tested for efficacy and specific detection for all parasites DNA samples. The results showed that 170 and 319 bp specific PCR products were generated as equivalent to positive result in H. taichui and O. viverrini, respectively by having no cross-reaction with any parasites tested. PCR conditions are recommended at 68 °C annealing temperature and with 0.5 mM magnesium chloride (Mg Cl₂). Additionally, specific primers developed in this study were effective to determine the presence of both parasites in fish and snail intermediate hosts, which the DNA of O. viverrini was artificially spiked since it is rarely found in northern Thailand.The H. taichui and O. viverrini-specific primers successfully developed in this study can be use for epidemiological monitoring, preventing management and control programs.     

The beta -hairpin motif of UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage processing, and UvrC-mediated incisions.

UvrB plays a major role in recognition and processing of DNA lesions during nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure of UvrB revealed a similar fold as found in monomeric DNA helicases. Homology modeling suggested that the beta-hairpin motif of UvrB might be involved in DNA binding (Theis, K., Chen, P. J., Skorvaga, M., Van Houten, B., and Kisker, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6899-6907). To determine a role of the beta-hairpin of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB, we have constructed a deletion mutant, Deltabetah UvrB, which lacks residues Gln-97-Asp-112 of the beta-hairpin. Deltabetah UvrB does not form a stable UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex and is inactive in UvrABC-mediated incision. However, Deltabetah UvrB is able to bind to UvrA and form a complex with UvrA and damaged DNA, competing with wild type UvrB. In addition, Deltabetah UvrB shows wild type-like ATPase activity in complex with UvrA that is stimulated by damaged DNA. In contrast to wild type UvrB, the ATPase activity of mutant UvrB does not lead to a destabilization of the damaged duplex. These results indicate that the conserved beta-hairpin motif is a major factor in DNA binding.     

ATPase activity of the UvrA and UvrAB protein complexes of the Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease.

We have analyzed the ATPase activity exhibited by the UvrABC DNA repair complex. The UvrA protein is an ATPase whose lack of DNA dependence may be related to the ATP induced monomer-dimer transitions. ATP induced dimerization may be responsible for the enhanced DNA binding activity observed in the presence of ATP. Although the UvrA ATPase is not stimulated by dsDNA, such DNA can modulate the UvrA ATPase activity by decreases in Km and Vm and alterations in the Ki for ADP and ATP-gamma-S. The induction of such changes upon binding to DNA may be necessary for cooperative interactions of UvrA with UvrB that result in a DNA stimulated ATPase for the UvrAB protein complex. The UvrAB ATPase displays unique kinetic profiles that are dependent on the structure of the DNA effector. These kinetic changes correlate with changes in footprinting patterns, the stabilization of protein complexes on DNA damage and with the expression of helicase activity.     

Potential role of proteolysis in the control of UvrABC incision

UvrB is specifically proteolyzed in Escherichia coli cell extracts to UvrB*. UvrB* is capable of interacting with UvrA in an aparently similar manner to the UvrB, however UvrB* is defective in the DNA strand displacement activity normally displayed by UvrAB. Whereas the binding of UvrC to a UvrAB-DNA complex leads to DNA incision and persistence of a stable post-incision protein-DNA complex, the binding of UvrC to UvrAB* leads to dissociation of the protein complex and no DNA incision is seen. The factor which stimulates this proteolysis has been partially purified and its substrate specificity has been examined. The protease factor is induced by “stress” and is under control of the htpR gene. The potential role of this proteolysis in the regulation of levels of active repair enzymes in the cell is discussed.     

Functional characterization of orchardgrass endoplasmic reticulum-resident Hsp90 (DgHsp90) as a chaperone and an ATPase

Hsp90 proteins are essential molecular chaperones regulating multiple cellular processes in distinct subcellular organelles. In this study, we report the functional characterization of a cDNA encoding endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident Hsp90 from orchardgrass (DgHsp90). DgHsp90 is a 2742 bp cDNA with an open reading frame predicted to encode an 808 amino acid protein. DgHsp90 has a well conserved N-terminal ATPase domain and a C-terminal Hsp90 domain and ER-retention motif. Expression of DgHsp90 increased during heat stress at 35 °C or H₂O₂ treatment. DgHsp90 also functions as a chaperone protein by preventing thermal aggregation of malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37) and citrate synthase (EC 2.3.3.1). The intrinsic ATPase activity of DgHsp90 was inhibited by geldanamycin, an Hsp90 inhibitor, and the inhibition reduced the chaperone activity of DgHsp90. Yeast cells overexpressing DgHsp90 exhibited enhanced thermotolerance.     

Complete mtDNA of Meretrix lusoria (Bivalvia: Veneridae) reveals the presence of an atp8 gene, length variation and heteroplasmy in the control region

The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the clam Meretrix lusoria (Bivalvia: Veneridae) was determined. It comprises 20,268 base pairs (bp) and contains 13 protein-coding genes, including ATPase subunit 8 (atp8), two ribosomal RNAs, 22 transfer RNAs, and a non-coding control region. The atp8 encodes a protein of 39 amino acids. All genes are encoded on the same strand. A putative control region (CR or D-loop) was identified in the major non-coding region (NCR) between the tRNA^Gly and tRNA^Gln. A 1087 bp tandem repeat fragment was identified that comprises nearly 11 copies of a 101 bp motif and accounts for approximately 41% of the NCR. The 101 bp tandem repeat motif of the NCR can be folded into a stem–loop secondary structure. Samples of eight individuals from Hainan and Fujian provinces were collected and their NCR regions were successfully amplified and sequenced. The data revealed a highly polymorphic VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) associated with high levels of heteroplasmy in the D-loop region. The size of the CR ranged from 1942 to 3354 bp depending upon the copy number of the repeat sequence.