Mitotic chromosome size scaling in Xenopus

As rapid divisions without growth generate progressively smaller cells within an embryo, mitotic chromosomes must also decrease in size to permit their proper segregation, but this scaling phenomenon is poorly understood. We demonstrated previously that nuclear and spindle size scale between egg extracts of the related frog species Xenopus tropicalis and Xenopus laevis, but show here that dimensions of isolated mitotic sperm chromosomes do not differ. This is consistent with the hypothesis that chromosome scaling does not occur in early embryonic development when cell and spindles sizes are large and anaphase B segregates chromosomes long distances. To recapitulate chromosome scaling during development, we combined nuclei isolated from different stage Xenopus laevis embryos with metaphase-arrested egg extracts. Mitotic chromosomes derived from nuclei of cleaving embryos through the blastula stage were similar in size to replicated sperm chromosomes, but decreased in area approximately 50% by the neurula stage, reproducing the trend in size changes observed in fixed embryos. Allowing G2 nuclei to swell in interphase prior to mitotic condensation did not increase mitotic chromosome size, but progression through a full cell cycle in egg extract did, suggesting that epigenetic mechanisms determining chromosome size can be altered during DNA replication. Comparison of different sized mitotic chromosomes assembled in vitro provides a tractable system to elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms.     

Mitotic chromosome length scales in response to both cell and nuclear size

Multicellular development requires that cells reduce in size as a result of consecutive cell divisions without increase in embryo volume. To maintain cellular integrity, organelle size adapts to cell size throughout development. During mitosis, the longest chromosome arm must be shorter than half of the mitotic spindle for proper chromosome segregation. Using high-resolution time-lapse microscopy of living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, we have quantified the relation between cell size and chromosome length. In control embryos, chromosome length scaled to cell size. Artificial reduction of cell size resulted in a shortening of chromosome length, following a trend predicted by measurements from control embryos. Disturbing the RAN (Ras-related nuclear protein)-GTP gradient decoupled nuclear size from cell size and resulted in chromosome scaling to nuclear size rather than cell size; smaller nuclei contained shorter chromosomes independent of cell size. In sum, quantitative analysis relating cell, nuclear, and chromosome size predicts two levels of chromosome length regulation: one through cell size and a second in response to nuclear size.     

Mitotic chromosome structure

The various models of chromatin fiber folding that have been proposed over the years are considered and evaluated. It is concluded that the radial loop / scaffold model is strongly supported by the available evidence, although the term ‘scaffold’ may be an unfortunate one. The scaffold is not a solid rod running the length of the chromatid but rather appears to be an aggregation of discrete anchoring complexes for the loops of the fiber. Despite support for this model, there is a need for more evidence to resolve the questions that remain.     

Mitotic chromosome structure

Mounting evidence is compiling linking the physical organizational structure of chromosomes and the nuclear structure to biological function. At the base of the physical organizational structure of both is the concept of loop formation. This implies that physical proximity within chromosomes is provided for otherwise distal genomic regions and thus hierarchically organizing the chromosomes. Together with entropy many experimental observations can be explained with these two concepts. Among the observations that can be explained are the measured physical extent of the chromosomes, their shape, mechanical behavior, the segregation into territories (chromosomal and territories within chromosomes), the results from chromosome conformation capture experiments, as well as linking gene expression to structural organization.     

Mitotic chromosome condensation in vertebrates

Work from several laboratories over the past 10-15 years has revealed that, within the interphase nucleus, chromosomes are organized into spatially distinct territories [T. Cremer, C. Cremer, Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 292-301 and T. Cremer, M. Cremer, S. Dietzel, S. Muller, I. Solovei, S. Fakan, Chromosome territories-a functional nuclear landscape, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18 (2006) 307-316]. The overall compaction level and intranuclear location varies as a function of gene density for both entire chromosomes [J.A. Croft, J.M. Bridger, S. Boyle, P. Perry, P. Teague,W.A. Bickmore, Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus, J. Cell Biol. 145 (1999) 1119-1131] and specific chromosomal regions [N.L. Mahy, P.E. Perry, S. Gilchrist, R.A. Baldock, W.A. Bickmore, Spatial organization of active and inactive genes and noncoding DNA within chromosome territories, J. Cell Biol. 157 (2002) 579-589] (Fig. 1A, A'). In prophase, when cyclin B activity reaches a high threshold, chromosome condensation occurs followed by Nuclear Envelope Breakdown (NEB) [1]. At this point vertebrate chromosomes appear as compact structures harboring an attachment point for the spindle microtubules physically recognizable as a primary constriction where the two sister chromatids are held together. The transition from an unshaped interphase chromosome to the highly structured mitotic chromosome (compare Figs. 1A and B) has fascinated researchers for several decades now; however a definite picture of how this process is achieved and regulated is not yet in our hands and it will require more investigation to comprehend the complete process. From a biochemical point of view a vertebrate mitotic chromosomes is composed of DNA, histone proteins (60%) and non-histone proteins (40%) [6]. I will discuss below what is known to date on the contribution of these two different classes of proteins and their co-operation in establishing the final mitotic chromosome structure.     

Mitotic chromosome structure and condensation

Mitotic chromosome structure has been the cell biology equivalent of a 'riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma'. Observations that genetic knockout or knockdown of condensin subunits or topoisomerase II cause only minimal perturbation in overall chromosome condensation, together with analysis of early stages of chromosome condensation and effects produced by histone H1 depletion, suggest a need to reconsider textbook models of mitotic chromosome condensation and organization.     

Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro

In vitro chromosome doubling can be induced by several antimitotic agents. The most commonly used are colchicine, oryzalin and trifluralin. The process of induced chromosome doubling in vitro consists of a typical succession of sub-processes, including an induction phase and a confirmation protocol to measure the rate of success. The induction step depends on a large number of variables: media, antimitotic agents, explant types, exposure times and concentrations. Flow cytometry is the pre-eminent method for evaluation of the induced polyploidization. However, alternative confirmation methods, such as chromosome counts and morphological observations, are also used. Since polyploidization has many consequences for plant growth and development, chromosome doubling has been intensively studied over the years and has found its way to several applications in plant breeding. This review gives an overview of the common methods of chromosome doubling in vitro, the history of the technique, and progress made over the years. The applications of chromosome doubling in a broader context are also discussed.     

Mitotic chromosome formation and the condensin paradox

During cell division, the chromatin is compacted and resolved into discrete mitotic chromosomes whose proper formation is essential for the faithful distribution of the replicated genome to the daughter cells. Chromatin within mitotic chromosomes is packaged in an orderly and reproducible fashion, but the nature of this higher-order structure has remained elusive, as have the mechanisms of its establishment. Here we provide an overview of how the functional dissection of a non-histone protein complex, condensin, has contributed to our understanding of mitotic chromosomes. Recent studies have revealed that mitotic chromosome formation involves two events: chromatin compaction and establishment of a stable intrinsic higher-order structure. Surprisingly, condensin is only required for the second of these events.     

Katanin contributes to interspecies spindle length scaling in Xenopus

Bipolar spindles must separate chromosomes by the appropriate distance during cell division, but mechanisms determining spindle length are poorly understood. Based on a 2D model of meiotic spindle assembly, we predicted that higher localized microtubule (MT) depolymerization rates could generate the shorter spindles observed in egg extracts of X. tropicalis compared to X. laevis. We found that katanin-dependent MT severing was increased in X. tropicalis, which, unlike X. laevis, lacks an inhibitory phosphorylation site in the katanin p60 catalytic subunit. Katanin inhibition lengthened spindles in both species. In X. tropicalis, k-fiber MT bundles that connect to chromosomes at their kinetochores extended through spindle poles, disrupting them. In both X. tropicalis extracts and the spindle simulation, a balance between k-fiber number and MT depolymerization is required to maintain spindle morphology. Thus, mechanisms have evolved in different species to scale spindle size and coordinate regulation of multiple MT populations in order to generate a robust steady-state structure.     

Mitotic remodeling of the replicon and chromosome structure

Animal cloning by nuclear-transfer experiments frequently fails due to the inability of transplanted nuclei to support normal embryonic development. We show here that the formation of mitotic chromosomes in the egg context is crucial for adapting differentiated nuclei for early development. Differentiated erythrocyte nuclei replicate inefficiently in Xenopus eggs but do so as rapidly as sperm nuclei if a prior single mitosis is permitted. This mitotic remodeling involves a topoisomerase II-dependent shortening of chromatin loop domains and an increased recruitment of replication initiation factors onto chromatin, leading to a short interorigin spacing characteristic of early developmental stages. It also occurs within each early embryonic cell cycle and dominantly regulates initiation of DNA replication for the subsequent S phase. These results indicate that mitotic conditioning is crucial to reset the chromatin structure of differentiated adult donor cells for embryonic DNA replication and suggest that it is an important step in nuclear cloning.     

Mitotic crossing over in chromosome I disomics of Aspergillus nidulans

Summary The frequency and pattern of homologous recombination in chromsome I disomics of Aspergillus nidulans is presented. Approximately 6% of randomly selected haploid breakdown sectors are recombinant. Most of these arise from double exchange events, one of which is located in the centromere region, the other distal on the left arm. Other marked regions are rarely involved in a recombination event. Reciprocal genotypes arise in approximately equal frequencies indicating that exchange results in reciprocally recombined non-sister chromatids at the four strand stage of mitosis. Possible theories for the extreme localisation of exchange events are discussed.     

Mitotic spindle assembly around RCC1-coated beads in Xenopus egg extracts

During cell division the genetic material on chromosomes is distributed to daughter cells by a dynamic microtubule structure called the mitotic spindle. Here we establish a reconstitution system to assess the contribution of individual chromosome proteins to mitotic spindle formation around single 10 μm diameter porous glass beads in Xenopus egg extracts. We find that Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 1 (RCC1), the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) for the small GTPase Ran, can induce bipolar spindle formation. Remarkably, RCC1 beads oscillate within spindles from pole to pole, a behavior that could be converted to a more typical, stable association by the addition of a kinesin together with RCC1. These results identify two activities sufficient to mimic chromatin-mediated spindle assembly, and establish a foundation for future experiments to reconstitute spindle assembly entirely from purified components.     

Mitotic checkpoints and the maintenance of the chromosome karyotype

The goal of the mitotic cell division is the faithful transmission of chromosomes to the daughter cells. To fulfil a correct separation of sister chromatids, kinetochores of all chromosomes should be correctly attached to spindle microtubules of opposite poles and should all be under tension. These events are monitored by the spindle checkpoint, which delays mitotic progression allowing time for corrections when errors occur in the dynamic interactions between chromosomes and microtubules. The G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint constitutes an additional checkpoint preventing further proliferation of cells that have undergone massive spindle damage. This review concentrates on the key structural and protein components which are pivotal for an accurate segregation of chromosomes during anaphase: the chromosome scaffold, sister chromatid cohesion and segregation and the kinetochores in higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, recent advances in understanding spindle and G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint and how they prevent aneuploidization and polyploidization are presented. In a last part the impact of aneuploidy and polyploidy on human health and in particular on cancer development is highlighted.     

Regulation of heart size in Xenopus laevis

The region with the potential to form the heart has traditionally been called the heart field. This region can be approximated by, but is not identical to, the expression domain of the early cardiac gene Nkx2.5. The region expressing Nkx2.5 does not change in size, although there are major shape changes and a subdivision of the region into non-myogenic and myogenic lineages. Using a variety of embryo manipulations, we have sought to determine whether cellular interactions could change the size of the initial Nkx2.5-expressing region and thus change the size of the heart. We have shown that if the heart is isolated from the dorsal half of the embryo, the volume of tissue expressing myocardial differentiation markers increases, indicating that signals restricting the size of the heart come from the dorsal side. Despite the change in myocardial volume, the non-myogenic heart lineages are still present. The ability of dorsal tissues to restrict the size of the heart is further demonstrated by fusing two Xenopus embryos shortly after gastrulation, generating twinned embryos where the heart of one embryo would develop adjacent to different tissues of the second embryo. The final size of the differentiated heart was markedly reduced if it developed in close proximity to the dorso-anterior surface of the head but not if it developed adjacent to the flank or belly. In all cases, the manipulations that restricted the size of the myocardium also restricted the expression of Nkx2.5 and GATA-4, both key regulatory genes in the cardiogenic pathway. These results provide evidence for a model in which signals from dorso-anterior tissues restrict the size of the heart after gastrulation but before neural fold closure.     

Centrosome size: scaling without measuring

Centrosome size is controlled by a limiting component mechanism in which a fixed quantity of precursor protein is divided up among however many centrosomes are present. This simple scheme explains size control and scaling of centrosomes relative to cell volume.     

Genome size scaling through phenotype space

Background and Aims: Early observations that genome size was positively correlatedwith cell size formed the basis of hypothesized consequencesof genome size variation at higher phenotypic scales. This scalingwas supported by several studies showing a positive relationshipbetween genome size and seed mass, and various metrics of growthand leaf morphology. However, many of these studies were undertakenwith limited species sets, and often performed within a singlegenus. Here we seek to generalize the relationship between genomesize and the phenotype by examining eight phenotypic traitsusing large cross-species comparisons involving diverse assemblagesof angiosperm and gymnosperm species. These analyses are presentedin order of increasing scale (roughly equating to the numberof cells required to produce a particular phenotypic trait),following the order of: cell size (guard cell and epidermal),stomatal density, seed mass, leaf mass per unit area (LMA),wood density, photosynthetic rate and finally maximum plantheight. Scope: The results show that genome size is a strong predictor of phenotypictraits at the cellular level (guard cell length and epidermalcell area had significant positive relationships with genomesize). Stomatal density decreased with increasing genome size,but this did not lead to decreased photosynthetic rate. At higherphenotypic scales, the predictive power of genome size generallydiminishes (genome size had weak predictive power for both LMAand seed mass), except in the interesting case of maximum plantheight (tree species tend to have small genomes). There wasno relationship with wood density. The general observation thatspecies with larger genome size have larger seed mass was supported;however, species with small genome size can also have largeseed masses. All of these analyses involved robust comparativemethods that incorporate the phylogenetic relationships of species. Conclusions: Genome size correlations are quite strong at the cellular levelbut decrease in predictive power with increasing phenotypicscale. Our hope is that these results may lead to new mechanistichypotheses about why genome size scaling exists at the cellularlevel, and why nucleotypic consequences diminish at higher phenotypicscales.