组蛋白翻译后修饰与DNA损伤响应蛋白招募的调控

组蛋白翻译后修饰是细胞DNA损伤早期应答反应的重要内涵,一方面是松弛、开放染色质结构的必要分子调节事件,以便DNA损伤响应蛋白能接近DNA损伤位点;另一方面直接参与DNA损伤修复蛋白招募过程的调控。综述了在DNA损伤信号激发下,发生的组蛋白主要修饰类型,异组蛋白H2AX、H2A.Z在DNA损伤部位与组蛋白置换,及其对DNA损伤响应蛋白招募的调节作用和机制。     

The multi-functionality of UHRF1: epigenome maintenance and preservation of genome integrity

During S phase, the cooperation between the macromolecular complexes regulating DNA synthesis, epigenetic information maintenance and DNA repair is advantageous for cells, as they can rapidly detect DNA damage and initiate the DNA damage response (DDR). UHRF1 is a fundamental epigenetic regulator; its ability to coordinate DNA methylation and histone code is unique across proteomes of different species. Recently, UHRF1’s role in DNA damage repair has been explored and recognized to be as important as its role in maintaining the epigenome. UHRF1 is a sensor for interstrand crosslinks and a determinant for the switch towards homologous recombination in the repair of double-strand breaks; its loss results in enhanced sensitivity to DNA damage. These functions are finely regulated by specific post-translational modifications and are mediated by the SRA domain, which binds to damaged DNA, and the RING domain. Here, we review recent studies on the role of UHRF1 in DDR focusing on how it recognizes DNA damage and cooperates with other proteins in its repair. We then discuss how UHRF1’s epigenetic abilities in reading and writing histone modifications, or its interactions with ncRNAs, could interlace with its role in DDR.     

Protein degradation in DNA damage response

DNA damage is a major threat to genome integrity. To reduce its deleterious effects, cells have developed coordinated responses, collectively referred to as the "DNA damage response" pathway (DDR). In multicellular organisms, the DDR pathway has a critical role in preventing tumorigenesis, which accounts for the wide use of drugs targeting DDR factors in anti-cancer therapy. Post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, acetylation, sumoylation are integral part of the DDR pathway. Ubiquitylation of DDR-related factors has recently emerged both as a switch initiating signaling cascades and as a proteolytic signal coordinating recruitment and disassembly of those proteins. In this review we will present evidence supporting an increasingly important role for the ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation in regulating DDR at different levels.     

Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response

A timely and accurate cellular response to DNA damage requires tight regulation of the action of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins at lesions. A multitude of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of chromatin and chromatin‐associated proteins coordinates the recruitment of critical proteins that dictate the appropriate DNA repair pathway and enable the actual repair of lesions. Phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, neddylation, poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation, acetylation, and methylation are among the DNA damage‐induced PTMs that have taken center stage as important DDR regulators. Redundant and multivalent interactions of DDR proteins with PTMs may not only be a means to facilitate efficient relocalization, but also a feature that allows high temporal and spatial resolution of protein recruitment to, and extraction from, DNA damage sites. In this review, we will focus on the complex interplay between such PTMs, and discuss the importance of their interconnectivity in coding DNA lesions and maintaining the integrity of the genome.     

A novel single‐cell method provides direct evidence of persistent DNA damage in senescent cells and aged mammalian tissues

The DNA damage response (DDR) arrests cell cycle progression until DNA lesions, like DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs), are repaired. The presence of DSBs in cells is usually detected by indirect techniques that rely on the accumulation of proteins at DSBs, as part of the DDR. Such detection may be biased, as some factors and their modifications may not reflect physical DNA damage. The dependency on DDR markers of DSB detection tools has left questions unanswered. In particular, it is known that senescent cells display persistent DDR foci, that we and others have proposed to be persistent DSBs, resistant to endogenous DNA repair activities. Others have proposed that these peculiar DDR foci might not be sites of damaged DNA per se but instead stable chromatin modifications, termed DNA‐SCARS. Here, we developed a method, named ‘DNA damage in situ ligation followed by proximity ligation assay’ (DI‐PLA) for the detection and imaging of DSBs in cells. DI‐PLA is based on the capture of free DNA ends in fixed cells in situ, by ligation to biotinylated double‐stranded DNA oligonucleotides, which are next recognized by antibiotin anti‐bodies. Detection is enhanced by PLA with a partner DDR marker at the DSB. We validated DI‐PLA by demonstrating its ability to detect DSBs induced by various genotoxic insults in cultured cells and tissues. Most importantly, by DI‐PLA, we demonstrated that both senescent cells in culture and tissues from aged mammals retain true unrepaired DSBs associated with DDR markers.     

组蛋白泛素化修饰及其在DNA损伤应答中的作用

泛素化修饰是真核生物细胞内重要的翻译后修饰类型,通过调节蛋白质活性、稳定性和亚细胞定位广泛参与细胞内各项信号传导与代谢过程,对维持正常生命活动具有重要意义。组蛋白作为染色质中主要的蛋白成分,与DNA复制转录、修复等行为密切相关,是研究翻译后修饰的热点。DNA损伤后,组蛋白泛素化修饰通过调节核小体结构、激活细胞周期检查点、影响修复因子的招募与装配等诸多途径参与损伤应答。同时,组蛋白泛素化修饰还能调节其他位点翻译后修饰,并通过这种串扰(crosstalk)作用调节DNA损伤应答。本文介绍了组蛋白泛素化修饰的主要位点和相关组分(包括E3连接酶、去泛素化酶与效应分子),以及这些修饰作用共同编译形成的信号网络在DNA损伤应答中的作用,最后总结了目前该领域研究所面临的一些问题,以期为科研人员进一步探索组蛋白密码在DNA损伤应答中的作用提供参考。     

Chromatin modulation and the DNA damage response

The ability to sense and respond appropriately to genetic lesions is vitally important to maintain the integrity of the genome. Emerging evidence indicates that various modulations to chromatin structure are centrally important to many aspects of the DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we discuss recently described roles for specific post-translational covalent modifications to histone proteins, as well as ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling, in DNA damage signalling and repair of DNA double strand breaks.     

SET8 methyltransferase activity during the DNA double-strand break response is required for recruitment of 53BP1

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) activate a signaling pathway known as the DNA damage response (DDR) which via protein–protein interactions and post-translational modifications recruit signaling proteins, such as 53BP1, to chromatin flanking the lesion. Depletion of the SET8 methyltransferase prevents accumulation of 53BP1 at DSBs; however, this phenotype has been attributed to the role of SET8 in generating H4K20 methylation across the genome, which is required for 53BP1 binding to chromatin, prior to DNA damage. Here, we report that SET8 acts directly at DSBs during the DNA damage response (DDR). SET8 accumulates at DSBs and is enzymatically active at DSBs. Depletion of SET8 just prior to the induction of DNA damage abrogates 53BP1’s accumulation at DSBs, suggesting that SET8 acts during DDR. SET8’s occupancy at DSBs is regulated by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Finally, SET8 is functionally required for efficient repair of DSBs specifically via the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ). Our findings reveal that SET8’s active role during DDR at DSBs is required for 53BP1’s accumulation.     

Post-translational Modification in Control of SIRT1 Stability during DNA Damage Response

SIRT1 (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1), a class III histone deacetylase, is known to participate in multiple steps of the DNA damage response (DDR) by deacetylating several key DDR proteins. At present, the mechanisms regulating SIRT1 protein stability upon DNA damage have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, we reveal that, under severe DNA damage, SIRT1 undergoes two forms of post-translational modifications (PTMs): (i) increased polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation mediated by TRIM28 (tripartite motif-containing protein 28), a RING-domain E3 ligase; and (ii) cleavage at C-terminal mediated by caspases. Importantly, there is reciprocal effects between these forms of PTMs: while suppression of proteasome reduces caspases-mediated cleavage, the cleaved SIRT1 has enhanced interaction with TRIM28, thus facilitating the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of SIRT1. Functionally, SIRT1 works as an anti-apoptotic protein in DDR, and the above-mentioned PTMs of SIRT1 subsequently enhances cell death induced by DNA damage agents. Thus, our study has uncovered a pivotal role of SIRT1 post-translational regulation in determining cell fate in DDR.     

Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response

The regulatory networks of the DNA damage response (DDR) encompass many proteins and posttranslational modifications. Here, we use mass spectrometry-based proteomics to analyze the systems-wide response to DNA damage by parallel quantification of the DDR-regulated phosphoproteome, acetylome, and proteome. We show that phosphorylation-dependent signaling networks are regulated more strongly compared to acetylation. Among the phosphorylated proteins identified are many putative substrates of DNA-PK, ATM, and ATR kinases, but a majority of phosphorylated proteins do not share the ATM/ATR/DNA-PK target consensus motif, suggesting an important role of downstream kinases in amplifying DDR signals. We show that the splicing-regulator phosphatase PPM1G is recruited to sites of DNA damage, while the splicing-associated protein THRAP3 is excluded from these regions. Moreover, THRAP3 depletion causes cellular hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Collectively, these data broaden our knowledge of DNA damage signaling networks and highlight an important link between RNA metabolism and DNA repair.     

丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶与DNA损伤应答

DNA损伤应答(DNA damage response,DDR)是维持基因组稳定性的核心机制,对DDR的研究不仅有助于阐明癌症发生发展的机理,同时也为癌症治疗和抗癌新药开发提供生物学基础。蛋白质翻译后修饰,尤其是蛋白激酶介导的磷酸化修饰和蛋白磷酸酶介导的去磷酸化修饰,参与调控绝大多数的生命活动过程,包括DDR。对蛋白激酶ATM/ATR/CHK2/CHK1介导的DDR的研究已经比较透彻,但是对蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能研究还有待加强和深入。比较全面地综述丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能并探讨在抗癌新药开发中的前景。     

A novel role for Greatwall kinase in recovery from DNA damage

Activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for genomic integrity and tumor suppression. The occurrence of DNA damage quickly evokes the DDR through ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction, which promotes DNA repair and activates the checkpoint to halt cell cycle progression. The shut off process of the DDR upon satisfaction of DNA repair, also known as “checkpoint recovery,” involves deactivation of DDR elements, but the mechanism is poorly understood. Greatwall kinase (Gwl) has been identified as a key element in the G₂/M transition and helps maintain M phase through inhibition of PP2A/B55δ, the principal phosphatase for Cdk-phosphorylated substrates. Here, we show that Gwl also promotes recovery from DNA damage and is itself directly inhibited by the DNA damage response (DDR). In Xenopus egg extracts, immunodepletion of Gwl increased the DDR to damaged DNA, whereas addition of wild-type, but not kinase-dead Gwl, inhibited the DDR. The removal of damaged DNA from egg extracts leads to recovery from checkpoint arrest and entry into mitosis, a process impaired by Gwl depletion and enhanced by Gwl overexpression. Moreover, activation of Cdk1 after the removal of damaged DNA is regulated by Gwl. Collectively, these results defines Gwl as a new regulator of the DDR, which plays an important role in recovery from DNA damage.Key words: Greatwall,; DNA damage; checkpoint recovery     

The first Sino-German Symposium on DNA Repair and Human Diseases

The first Sino-German Symposium on DNA Repair and Human Diseases was held in the Capital Normal University, Beijing, China, from October 9th to 11th, 2010. It was initiated and organized by Xingzhi Xu and Zhao-Qi Wang with strong support from top scientists in the field from China, Germany and the United States. Financially, it was fully supported by the Sino-German Center for Science Promotion jointly founded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). This report summarizes 35 plenary lectures presented during this three-day symposium, with topics ranging from DNA damage checkpoint signaling, DNA repair, posttranslational protein modifications in DNA damage response (DDR) to DDR in ageing and cancer. This symposium stimulated extensive discussions on science and potential collaboration among the 230 participants.