Multiple Regulation of Rad51-Mediated Homologous Recombination by Fission Yeast Fbh1

Fbh1, an F-box helicase related to bacterial UvrD, has been proposed to modulate homologous recombination in fission yeast. We provide several lines of evidence for such modulation. Fbh1, but not the related helicases Srs2 and Rqh1, suppressed the formation of crossover recombinants from single HO-induced DNA double-strand breaks. Purified Fbh1 in complex with Skp1 (Fbh1-Skp1 complex) inhibited Rad51-driven DNA strand exchange by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments in an ATP-dependent manner; this disruption was alleviated by the Swi5-Sfr1 complex, an auxiliary activator of Rad51. In addition, the reconstituted SCF^Fbh1 complex, composed of purified Fbh1-Skp1 and Pcu1-Rbx1, displayed ubiquitin-ligase E3 activity toward Rad51. Furthermore, Fbh1 reduced the protein level of Rad51 in stationary phase in an F-box-dependent, but not in a helicase domain-independent manner. These results suggest that Fbh1 negatively regulates Rad51-mediated homologous recombination via its two putative, unrelated activities, namely DNA unwinding/translocation and ubiquitin ligation. In addition to its anti-recombinase activity, we tentatively suggest that Fbh1 might also have a pro-recombination role in vivo, because the Fbh1-Skp1 complex stimulated Rad51-mediated strand exchange in vitro after strand exchange had been initiated.     

A failure of meiotic chromosome segregation in a fbh1Delta mutant correlates with persistent Rad51-DNA associations

The F-box DNA helicase Fbh1 constrains homologous recombination in vegetative cells, most likely through an ability to displace the Rad51 recombinase from DNA. Here, we provide the first evidence that Fbh1 also serves a vital meiotic role in fission yeast to promote normal chromosome segregation. In the absence of Fbh1, chromosomes remain entangled or segregate unevenly during meiosis, and genetic and cytological data suggest that this results in part from a failure to efficiently dismantle Rad51 nucleofilaments that form during meiotic double-strand break repair.     

SCF ensures meiotic chromosome segregation through a resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates

The SCF (Skp1-Cul1-F-box) complex contributes to a variety of cellular events including meiotic cell cycle control, but its function during meiosis is not understood well. Here we describe a novel function of SCF/Skp1 in meiotic recombination and subsequent chromosome segregation. The skp1 temperature-sensitive mutant exhibited abnormal distribution of spindle microtubules in meiosis II, which turned out to originate from abnormal bending of the spindle in meiosis I. Bent spindles were reported in mitosis of this mutant, but it remained unknown how SCF could affect spindle morphology. We found that the meiotic bent spindle in skp1 cells was due to a hypertension generated by chromosome entanglement. The spindle bending was suppressed by inhibiting double strand break (DSB) formation, indicating that the entanglement was generated by the meiotic recombination machinery. Consistently, Rhp51/Rad51-Rad22/Rad52 foci persisted until meiosis I in skp1 cells, proving accumulation of recombination intermediates. Intriguingly bent spindles were also observed in the mutant of Fbh1, an F-box protein containing the DNA helicase domain, which is involved in meiotic recombination. Genetic evidence suggested its cooperation with SCF/Skp1. Thus, SCF/Skp1 together with Fbh1 is likely to function in the resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates, thereby ensuring proper chromosome segregation.     

The F-Box DNA helicase Fbh1 prevents Rhp51-dependent recombination without mediator proteins

A key step in homologous recombination is the loading of Rad51 onto single-stranded DNA to form a nucleoprotein filament that promotes homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange. Mediator proteins, such as Rad52 and Rad55-Rad57, are thought to aid filament assembly by overcoming an inhibitory effect of the single-stranded-DNA-binding protein replication protein A. Here we show that mediator proteins are also required to enable fission yeast Rad51 (called Rhp51) to function in the presence of the F-box DNA helicase Fbh1. In particular, we show that the critical function of Rad22 (an orthologue of Rad52) in promoting Rhp51-dependent recombination and DNA repair can be mostly circumvented by deleting fbh1. Similarly, the reduced growth/viability and DNA damage sensitivity of an fbh1(-) mutant are variously suppressed by deletion of any one of the mediators Rad22, Rhp55, and Swi5. From these data we propose that Rhp51 action is controlled through an interplay between Fbh1 and the mediator proteins. Colocalization of Fbh1 with Rhp51 damage-induced foci suggests that this interplay occurs at the sites of nucleoprotein filament assembly. Furthermore, analysis of different fbh1 mutant alleles suggests that both the F-box and helicase activities of Fbh1 contribute to controlling Rhp51.     

Analysis of Scc1-deficient cells defines a key metaphase role of vertebrate cohesin in linking sister kinetochores

Cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1p/Mcd1p/Rad21 permits sister chromatid separation and is considered to trigger anaphase onset. It has also been suggested that the cohesin complex is essential for chromosome condensation and for assembling fully functional kinetochores. Here, we used vertebrate cells conditionally deficient in Scc1 to probe cohesin function in mitosis. Cells lacking cohesin arrest in prometaphase, with many chromosomes failing to align at a metaphase plate and high levels of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein, BubR1, at all kinetochores. We show that the structural integrity of chromosomes is normal in the absence of Scc1. Furthermore, specific inhibition of topoisomerase II, which is required for decatenation of replicated chromosomes, can bypass the cohesin requirement for metaphase chromosome alignment and spindle checkpoint silencing. Since the kinetochore effects of Scc1 deficiency can be compensated for by topoisomerase II inhibition, we conclude that Scc1 is not absolutely required for kinetochore assembly or function, and that its principal role in allowing the onset of anaphase is the establishment of sufficient inter-sister tension to allow biorientation.     

Fbh1 Limits Rad51-Dependent Recombination at Blocked Replication Forks

Controlling the loading of Rad51 onto DNA is important for governing when and how homologous recombination is used. Here we use a combination of genetic assays and indirect immunofluorescence to show that the F-box DNA helicase (Fbh1) functions in direct opposition to the Rad52 orthologue Rad22 to curb Rad51 loading onto DNA in fission yeast. Surprisingly, this activity is unnecessary for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination. Instead it appears to play an important role in preventing recombination when replication forks are blocked and/or broken. When overexpressed, Fbh1 specifically reduces replication fork block-induced recombination, as well as the number of Rad51 nuclear foci that are induced by replicative stress. These abilities are dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity, suggesting that Fbh1 exerts its control on recombination by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, overexpression of Fbh1 also suppresses the high levels of recombinant formation and Rad51 accumulation at a site-specific replication fork barrier in a strain lacking the Rad51 disruptase Srs2. Similarly overexpression of Srs2 suppresses replication fork block-induced gene conversion events in an fbh1Δ mutant, although an inability to suppress deletion events suggests that Fbh1 has a distinct functionality, which is not readily substituted by Srs2.Homologous recombination (HR) is often described as a double-edged sword: it can maintain genome stability by promoting DNA repair, while its injudicious action can disturb genome stability by causing gross chromosome rearrangement (GCR) or loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Both GCR and LOH are potential precursors of diseases such as cancer, and consequently there is need to control when and how HR is used.A key step in most HR is the loading of the Rad51 recombinase onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which forms a nucleoprotein filament (nucleofilament) that catalyzes the pairing of homologous DNAs and subsequent strand invasion (32). This is a critical point at which recombination can be regulated through the removal of the Rad51 filament (60). Early removal can prevent strand invasion altogether, freeing the DNA for alternative processing. Later removal may limit unnecessary filament growth, free the 3′-OH of the invading strand to prime DNA synthesis, and ultimately enable ejection of the invading strand, which is important for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA). SDSA avoids the formation of Holliday junctions that can be resolved into reciprocal exchange products (crossovers), which may result in GCR or LOH if the recombination is ectopic or allelic, respectively.One enzyme that appears to be able to control Rad51 in the aforementioned manner is the yeast superfamily 1 DNA helicase Srs2 (42). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Srs2 is recruited to stalled replication forks by the SUMOylation of PCNA, and there it appears to block Rad51-dependent HR in favor of Rad6- and Rad18-dependent postreplication repair (1, 2, 35, 50, 53, 58). In vitro Srs2 can strip Rad51 from ssDNA via its DNA translocase activity (31, 62) and therefore probably controls HR at stalled replication forks by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis has shown that Rad51 is enriched at or near replication forks in an srs2 mutant (50). Srs2 also plays an important role in crossover avoidance during DSB repair, where it is thought to promote SDSA by both disrupting Rad51 nucleofilaments and dissociating displacement (D) loops (20, 27).Srs2 is conserved in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (19, 43, 63) and has a close relative in bacteria called UvrD, which can similarly control HR by disrupting RecA nucleofilaments (61). However, an obvious homologue in mammals has not been detected. Recently, two mammalian members of the RecQ DNA helicase family, BLM and RECQL5, were shown to disrupt Rad51 nucleofilaments in vitro (11, 25), although in the case of BLM, this activity appears to be relatively weak (5, 55). Nevertheless these data have led to speculation that both BLM and RECQL5 might perform a function similar to that of Srs2 in vivo (6). Certainly mutational inactivation of either helicase results in elevated levels of HR and genome instability, with an associated increased rate of cancer (23, 25). However, BLM and RECQL5 are not the only potential Rad51 disruptases in mammals; a relative of Srs2 and UvrD called FBH1 was recently implicated in this role by genetic studies of its orthologue in S. pombe and by its ability to partially compensate for the loss of Srs2 in S. cerevisiae, which, unlike S. pombe, lacks an FBH1 orthologue (15). FBH1 is so named because of an F box near its N terminus—a feature that makes it unique among DNA helicases (28). The F box is important for its interaction with SKP1 and therefore the formation of an E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF (SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein) complex (29). The targets of this complex are currently unknown. In S. pombe, mutations within Fbh1''s F-box block interaction with Skp1 and prevent Fbh1 from localizing to the nucleus and forming damage-induced foci therein (57). Fbh1''s role in constraining Rad51 activity in S. pombe is evidenced by the increase in spontaneous Rad51 foci and accumulation of UV irradiation-induced Rad51-dependent recombination intermediates in an fbh1Δ mutant (47). Moreover, loss of both Fbh1 and Srs2 in S. pombe results in a synergistic reduction in cell viability, and like Srs2, Fbh1 is essential for viability in the absence of the S. pombe RecQ family DNA helicase Rqh1, which processes recombination intermediates (47, 48). In both cases the synthetic interaction is suppressed by deleting rad51, suggesting that Fbh1 works in parallel with Srs2 and Rqh1 to prevent the formation of toxic recombination intermediates. In yeast, Rad51-mediated recombination is dependent on Rad52 (Rad22 in S. pombe), which is believed to promote the nucleation of Rad51 onto DNA that is coated with the ssDNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (18, 32). Intriguingly, the genotoxin sensitivity and recombination deficiency of a rad22 mutant are suppressed in a Rad51-dependent manner by deleting fbh1 (48). This suggests that Fbh1 and Rad22 act in opposing ways to modulate the assembly of the Rad51 nucleofilament. Although current data indicate a role for Fbh1 in controlling HR, the only evidence so far that Fbh1 limits recombinant formation is in chicken DT40 cells, for which a modest increase in sister chromatid exchange has been noted when FBH1 is deleted (30).Here we present in vivo evidence suggesting that Fbh1 does indeed act as a Rad51 disruptase, which is dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity. We confirm predictions that this activity works in opposition to Rad22 for the loading of Rad51 onto DNA and show that Fbh1''s modulation of Rad51 activity, while not essential for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination, is critical for preventing recombination at blocked replication forks. Finally, we highlight similarities and differences between Fbh1 and Srs2, based on their mutant phenotypes and relative abilities to suppress recombination when overexpressed. Overall our data affirm that Fbh1 is one of the principal modulators of Rad51 activity in fission yeast and therefore may play a similar role in vertebrates.     

RAD51D protects against MLH1-dependent cytotoxic responses to O6-methylguanine

S_N1-type methylating agents generate O⁶-methyl guanine (O⁶-meG), which is a potently mutagenic, toxic, and recombinogenic DNA adduct. Recognition of O⁶-meG:T mismatches by mismatch repair (MMR) causes sister chromatid exchanges, which are representative of homologous recombination (HR) events. Although the MMR-dependent mutagenicity and toxicity caused by O⁶-meG has been studied, the mechanisms of recombination induced by O⁶-meG are poorly understood. To explore the HR and MMR genetic interactions in mammals, we used the Rad51d and Mlh1 mouse models. Ablation of Mlh1 did not appreciably influence the developmental phenotypes conferred by the absence of Rad51d. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) deficient in Rad51d can only proliferate in p53-deficient background. Therefore, Rad51d^?/?Mlh1^?/? Trp53^?/? MEFs with a combined deficiency of HR and MMR were generated and comparisons between MLH1 and RAD51D status were made. To our knowledge, these MEFs are the first mammalian model system for combined HR and MMR defects. Rad51d-deficient MEFs were 5.3-fold sensitive to N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) compared to the Rad51d-proficient MEFs. A pronounced G2/M arrest in Rad51d-deficient cells was accompanied by an accumulation of γ-H2AX and apoptosis. Mlh1-deficient MEFs were resistant to MNNG and showed no G2/M arrest or apoptosis at the doses used. Importantly, loss of Mlh1 alleviated sensitivity of Rad51d-deficient cells to MNNG, in addition to reducing γ-H2AX, G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Collectively, the data support the hypothesis that MMR-dependent sensitization of HR-deficient cells is specific for O⁶-meG and suggest that HR resolves DNA intermediates created by MMR recognition of O⁶-meG:T. This study provides insight into recombinogenic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and chemotherapy resulting from O⁶-meG adducts.     

A non‐canonical function of topoisomerase II in disentangling dysfunctional telomeres

The decatenation activity of topoisomerase II (Top2), which is widely conserved within the eukaryotic domain, is essential for chromosomal segregation in mitosis. It is less clear, however, whether Top2 performs the same function uniformly across the whole genome, and whether all its functions rely on decatenation. In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, telomeres are bound by Taz1, which promotes smooth replication fork progression through the repetitive telomeric sequences. Hence, replication forks stall at taz1Δ telomeres. This leads to telomeric entanglements at low temperatures (⩽20°C) that cause chromosomal segregation defects and loss of viability. Here, we show that the appearance of entanglements, and the resulting cold sensitivity of taz1Δ cells, is suppressed by mutated alleles of Top2 that confer slower catalytic turnover. This suppression does not rely on the decatenation activity of Top2. Rather, the enhanced presence of reaction intermediates in which Top2 is clamped around DNA, promotes the removal of telomeric entanglements in vivo, independently of catalytic cycle completion. We propose a model for how the clamped enzyme–DNA complex promotes proper chromosomal segregation.     

Chromosomes with Two Intact Axial Cores Are Induced by G2 Checkpoint Override: Evidence That DNA Decatenation Is not Required to Template the Chromosome Structure

Here we report that DNA decatenation is not a physical requirement for the formation of mammalian chromosomes containing a two-armed chromosome scaffold. 2-aminopurine override of G₂ arrest imposed by VM-26 or ICRF-193, which inhibit topoisomerase II (topo II)–dependent DNA decatenation, results in the activation of p34^cdc2 kinase and entry into mitosis. After override of a VM-26–dependent checkpoint, morphologically normal compact chromosomes form with paired axial cores containing topo II and ScII. Despite its capacity to form chromosomes of normal appearance, the chromatin remains covalently complexed with topo II at continuous levels during G₂ arrest with VM-26. Override of an ICRF-193 block, which inhibits topo II–dependent decatenation at an earlier step than VM-26, also generates chromosomes with two distinct, but elongated, parallel arms containing topo II and ScII. These data demonstrate that DNA decatenation is required to pass a G₂ checkpoint, but not to restructure chromatin for chromosome formation. We propose that the chromosome core structure is templated during interphase, before DNA decatenation, and that condensation of the two-armed chromosome scaffold can therefore occur independently of the formation of two intact and separate DNA helices.     

Fbxo28 promotes mitotic progression and regulates topoisomerase IIα-dependent DNA decatenation

Topoisomerase IIα is an essential enzyme that resolves topological constraints in genomic DNA. It functions in disentangling intertwined chromosomes during anaphase leading to chromosome segregation thus preserving genomic stability. Here we describe a previously unrecognized mechanism regulating topoisomerase IIα activity that is dependent on the F-box protein Fbxo28. We find that Fbxo28, an evolutionarily conserved protein, is required for proper mitotic progression. Interfering with Fbxo28 function leads to a delay in metaphase-to-anaphase progression resulting in mitotic defects as lagging chromosomes, multipolar spindles and multinucleation. Furthermore, we find that Fbxo28 interacts and colocalizes with topoisomerase IIα throughout the cell cycle. Depletion of Fbxo28 results in an increase in topoisomerase IIα?dependent DNA decatenation activity. Interestingly, blocking the interaction between Fbxo28 and topoisomerase IIα also results in multinucleated cells. Our findings suggest that Fbxo28 regulates topoisomerase IIα decatenation activity and plays an important role in maintaining genomic stability.     

Accumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication

Checkpoints are cellular surveillance and signaling pathways that regulate responses to DNA damage and perturbations of DNA replication. Here we show that high levels of sumoylated Rad52 are present in the mec1 sml1 and rad53 sml1 checkpoint mutants exposed to DNA-damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or the DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU). The kinase-defective mutant rad53-K227A also showed high levels of Rad52 sumoylation. Elevated levels of Rad52 sumoylation occur in checkpoint mutants proceeding S phase being exposed DNA-damaging agent. Interestingly, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on chip analyses revealed non-canonical chromosomal localization of Rad52 in the HU-treated rad53-K227A cells arrested in early S phase: Rad52 localization at dormant and early DNA replication origins. However, such unusual localization was not dependent on the sumoylation of Rad52. In addition, we also found that Rad52 could be highly sumoylated in the absence of Rad51. Double mutation of RAD51 and RAD53 exhibited the similar levels of Rad52 sumoylation to RAD53 single mutation. The significance and regulation mechanism of Rad52 sumoylation by checkpoint pathways will be discussed.     

The topoisomerase II-associated protein, Pat1p, is required for maintenance of rDNA locus stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The Pat1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was identified during a screen for proteins that interact with topoisomerase II. Previously, we have shown that pat1Δ mutants exhibit a slow-growth phenotype and an elevated frequency of both mitotic and meiotic chromosome mis-segregation. Here, we have studied the effects of deleting the PAT1 gene on chromosomal stability, with particular reference to rates of homologous recombination within the rDNA locus. This locus was analyzed because rDNA-specific hyperrecombination is known to occur in conditional top2 mutants. We show that pat1Δ strains mimic top2 mutants in displaying an elevated rate of intrachromosomal excision recombination at the rDNA locus, but not elsewhere in the genome. The elevated rate of recombination is dependent upon Rad52p, but not upon Rad51p or Rad54p. However, pat1Δ strains display additional manifestations of more general genomic instability, in that they show mild sensitivity to UV light and an increased incidence of interchromosomal recombination between heteroalleles.     

BRCA1 participates in DNA decatenation

The tumor suppressor BRCA1 has an important function in the maintenance of genomic stability. Increasing evidence suggests that BRCA1 regulates cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair after DNA damage. However, little is known about its normal function in the absence of DNA damage. Here we show that BRCA1 interacts and colocalizes with topoisomerase IIalpha in S phase cells. Similar to cells treated with the topoisomerase IIalpha inhibitor ICRF-193, BRCA1-deficient cells show lagging chromosomes, indicating a defect in DNA decatenation and chromosome segregation. More directly, BRCA1 deficiency results in defective DNA decatenation in vitro. Finally, topoisomerase IIalpha is ubiquitinated in a BRCA1-dependent manner, and topoisomerase IIalpha ubiquitination correlates with higher DNA decatenation activity. Together these results suggest an important role of BRCA1 in DNA decatenation and reveal a previously unknown function of BRCA1 in the maintenance of genomic stability.     

DNA Topoisomerase III Localizes to Centromeres and Affects Centromeric CENP-A Levels in Fission Yeast

Centromeres are specialized chromatin regions marked by the presence of nucleosomes containing the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A, which is essential for chromosome segregation. Assembly and disassembly of nucleosomes is intimately linked to DNA topology, and DNA topoisomerases have previously been implicated in the dynamics of canonical H3 nucleosomes. Here we show that Schizosaccharomyces pombe Top3 and its partner Rqh1 are involved in controlling the levels of CENP-A^Cnp1 at centromeres. Both top3 and rqh1 mutants display defects in chromosome segregation. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation and tiling microarrays, we show that Top3, unlike Top1 and Top2, is highly enriched at centromeric central domains, demonstrating that Top3 is the major topoisomerase in this region. Moreover, centromeric Top3 occupancy positively correlates with CENP-A^Cnp1 occupancy. Intriguingly, both top3 and rqh1 mutants display increased relative enrichment of CENP-A^Cnp1 at centromeric central domains. Thus, Top3 and Rqh1 normally limit the levels of CENP-A^Cnp1 in this region. This new role is independent of the established function of Top3 and Rqh1 in homologous recombination downstream of Rad51. Therefore, we hypothesize that the Top3-Rqh1 complex has an important role in controlling centromere DNA topology, which in turn affects the dynamics of CENP-A^Cnp1 nucleosomes.     

Tumor suppressor RecQL5 controls recombination induced by DNA crosslinking agents

RecQ family DNA helicases function in the maintenance of genome stability. Mice deficient in RecQL5, one of five RecQ helicases, show a cancer predisposition phenotype, suggesting that RecQL5 plays a tumor suppressor role. RecQL5 interacts with Rad51, a key factor in homologous recombination (HR), and displaces Rad51 from Rad51-single stranded DNA (ssDNA) filaments in vitro. However, the precise roles of RecQL5 in the cell remain elusive. Here, we present evidence suggesting that RecQL5 is involved in DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair. Chicken DT40 RECQL5 gene knockout (KO) cells showed sensitivity to ICL-inducing agents such as cisplatin (CDDP) and mitomycin C (MMC) and a higher number of chromosome aberrations in the presence of MMC than wild-type cells. The phenotypes of RECQL5 KO cells resembled those of Fanconi anemia gene KO cells. Genetic analysis using corresponding gene knockout cells showed that RecQL5 is involved in the FANCD1 (BRCA2)-dependent ICL repair pathway in which Rad51-ssDNA filament formation is promoted by BRCA2. The disappearance but not appearance of Rad51-foci was delayed in RECQL5 KO cells after MMC treatment. Deletion of Rad54, which processes the Rad51-ssDNA filament in HR, in RECQL5 KO cells increased sensitivity to CDDP and further delayed the disappearance of Rad51-foci, suggesting that RecQL5 and Rad54 have different effects on the Rad51-ssDNA filament. Furthermore, the frequency and variation of CDDP-induced gene conversion at the immunoglobulin locus were increased in RECQL5 KO cells. These results suggest that RecQL5 plays a role in regulating the incidence and quality of ICL-induced recombination.     

Dual role of topoisomerase II in centromere resolution and aurora B activity

Chromosome segregation requires sister chromatid resolution. Condensins are essential for this process since they organize an axial structure where topoisomerase II can work. How sister chromatid separation is coordinated with chromosome condensation and decatenation activity remains unknown. We combined four-dimensional (4D) microscopy, RNA interference (RNAi), and biochemical analyses to show that topoisomerase II plays an essential role in this process. Either depletion of topoisomerase II or exposure to specific anti-topoisomerase II inhibitors causes centromere nondisjunction, associated with syntelic chromosome attachments. However, cells degrade cohesins and timely exit mitosis after satisfying the spindle assembly checkpoint. Moreover, in topoisomerase II–depleted cells, Aurora B and INCENP fail to transfer to the central spindle in late mitosis and remain tightly associated with centromeres of nondisjoined sister chromatids. Also, in topoisomerase II–depleted cells, Aurora B shows significantly reduced kinase activity both in S2 and HeLa cells. Codepletion of BubR1 in S2 cells restores Aurora B kinase activity, and consequently, most syntelic attachments are released. Taken together, our results support that topoisomerase II ensures proper sister chromatid separation through a direct role in centromere resolution and prevents incorrect microtubule–kinetochore attachments by allowing proper activation of Aurora B kinase.     

Srs2 enables checkpoint recovery by promoting disassembly of DNA damage foci from chromatin

Following DNA repair, checkpoint signalling must be abated to resume cell cycling in a phenomenon known as checkpoint recovery. Although a number of genes have been implicated in the recovery process, it is still unknown whether checkpoint recovery is caused by a signalling network activated by DNA repair or whether it is the result of the loss of DNA structures that elicit the checkpoint. Here we show that checkpoint recovery can be uncoupled from bulk chromosome DNA repair if single-stranded (ss) DNA persists. This situation occurs in cells that are deficient in the Srs2 helicase, a protein that antagonizes Rad51. We report that srs2Δ cells fail to eliminate Ddc2 and RPA subnuclear foci following bulk chromosome repair due to the persistence of ssDNA. In contrast to cells with DNA double-strand breaks that remain unrepaired, srs2Δ cells remove the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp from chromatin after repair. However, despite the loss of the 9-1-1 clamp, Dpb11 remains associated with chromatin to promote checkpoint activity. Our work indicates that Srs2 promotes checkpoint recovery by removing Rad51 after DNA repair. A failure to remove Rad51 causes persistence of ssDNA and the checkpoint signal. Therefore, we conclude that cells initiate recovery when the DNA structures that elicit the checkpoint are eliminated.