Two faces of the prokaryote concept.

Bacteria had remained undefined when, in 1962, Roger Y. Stanier and C.B. van Niel published their famed paper 'The concept of a bacterium.' The articulation of the prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy was a vital moment in the history of biology. This article provides a brief overview of the context in which the prokaryote concept was successfully launched in the 1960s, and what it was meant to connote. Two concepts were initially distinguished within the prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy at that time. One was organizational and referred to comparative cell structure; the other was phylogenetic and referred to a 'natural' classification. Here, I examine how the two concepts became inseparable; how the prokaryotes came to signify a monophyletic group that preceded the eukaryotes, and how this view remained unquestioned for 15 years, until the birth of molecular evolutionary biology and coherent methods for bacteria phylogenetics based on 16S rRNA. Today, while microbial phylogeneticists generally agree that the prokaryote is a polyphyletic group, there is no agreement on whether the term should be maintained in an organizational sense.     

Bacterial glycoproteins: functions,biosynthesis and applications

Although widely distributed in eukaryotic cells glycoproteins appear to be rare in prokaryotic organisms. The prevalence of the misconception that bacteria do not glycosylate their proteins has been a subject matter of discussion for a long time. Glycoconjugates that are linked to proteins or peptides, generated by the ribosomal translational mechanism have been reported only in the last two to three decades in a few prokaryotic organisms. Most studied prokaryotic glycoproteins are the S-layer glycoproteins of Archeabacteria. Apart from these, membrane-associated, surface-associated, secreted glycoproteins and exoenzymes glycoproteins are also well documented in both, Archea and Eubacteria. From the recent literature, it is now clear that prokaryotes are capable of glycosylating proteins. In general, prokaryotes are deprived of the cellular organelles required for glycosylation. In prokaryotes many different glycoprotein structures have been observed that display much more variation than that observed in eukaryotes. Besides following similar mechanisms in the process of glycosylation, prokaryotes have also been shown to use mechanisms that are different from those found in eukaryotes. The knowledge pertaining to the functional aspects of prokaryotic glycoproteins is rather scarce. This review summarizes developments and understanding relating to characteristics, synthesis, and functions of prokaryotic glycoproteins. An extensive summary of glycosylation that has been reported to occur in bacteria has also been tabulated. Various possible applications of these diverse biomolecules in biotechnology, vaccine development, pharmaceutics and diagnostics are also touched upon.     

Cell Biology of Prokaryotic Organelles

Mounting evidence in recent years has challenged the dogma that prokaryotes are simple and undefined cells devoid of an organized subcellular architecture. In fact, proteins once thought to be the purely eukaryotic inventions, including relatives of actin and tubulin control prokaryotic cell shape, DNA segregation, and cytokinesis. Similarly, compartmentalization, commonly noted as a distinguishing feature of eukaryotic cells, is also prevalent in the prokaryotic world in the form of protein-bounded and lipid-bounded organelles. In this article we highlight some of these prokaryotic organelles and discuss the current knowledge on their ultrastructure and the molecular mechanisms of their biogenesis and maintenance.The emergence of eukaryotes in a world dominated by prokaryotes is one of the defining moments in the evolution of modern day organisms. Although it is clear that the central metabolic and information processing machineries of eukaryotes and prokaryotes share a common ancestry, the origins of the complex eukaryotic cell plan remain mysterious. Eukaryotic cells are typified by the presence of intracellular organelles that compartmentalize essential biochemical reactions whereas their prokaryotic counterparts generally lack such sophisticated subspecialization of the cytoplasmic space. In most cases, this textbook categorization of eukaryotes and prokaryotes holds true. However, decades of research have shown that a number of unique and diverse organelles can be found in the prokaryotic world raising the possibility that the ability to form organelles may have existed before the divergence of eukaryotes from prokaryotes (Shively 2006).Skeptical readers might wonder if a prokaryotic structure can really be defined as an organelle. Here we categorize any compartment bounded by a biological membrane with a dedicated biochemical function as an organelle. This simple and broad definition presents cells, be they eukaryotes or prokaryotes, with a similar set of challenges that need to be addressed to successfully build an intracellular compartment. First, an organism needs to mold a cellular membrane into a desired shape and size. Next, the compartment must be populated with the proper set of proteins that carry out the activity of the organelle. Finally, the cell must ensure the proper localization, maintenance and segregation of these compartments across the cell cycle. Eukaryotic cells perform these difficult mechanistic steps using dedicated molecular pathways. Thus, if connections exist between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organelles it seems likely that relatives of these molecules may be involved in the biogenesis and maintenance of prokaryotic organelles as well.Prokaryotic organelles can be generally divided into two major groups based on the composition of the membrane layer surrounding them. First are the cellular structures bounded by a nonunit membrane such a protein shell or a lipid monolayer (Shively 2006). Well-known examples of these compartments include lipid bodies, polyhydroxy butyrate granules, carboxysomes, and gas vacuoles. The second class consists of those organelles that are surrounded by a lipid-bilayer membrane, an arrangement that is reminiscent of the canonical organelles of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Therefore, this article is dedicated to a detailed exploration of three prokaryotic lipid-bilayer bounded organelle systems: the magnetosomes of magnetotactic bacteria, photosynthetic membranes, and the internal membrane structures of the Planctomycetes. In each case, we present the most recent findings on the ultrastructure of these organelles and highlight the molecular mechanisms that control their formation, dynamics, and segregation. We also highlight some protein-bounded compartments to present the reader with a more complete view of prokaryotic compartmentalization.     

The prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy: meanings and mythology.

Drawing on documents both published and archival, this paper explains how the prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy of the 1960s was constructed, the purposes it served, and what it implied in terms of classification and phylogeny. In doing so, I first show how the concept was attributed to Edouard Chatton and the context in which he introduced the terms. Following, I examine the context in which the terms were reintroduced into biology in 1962 by Roger Stanier and C. B. van Niel. I study the discourse over the subsequent decade to understand how the organizational dichotomy took on the form of a natural classification as the kingdom Monera or superkingdom Procaryotae. Stanier and van Niel admitted that, in regard to constructing a natural classification of bacteria, structural characteristics were no more useful than physiological properties. They repeatedly denied that bacterial phylogenetics was possible. I thus examine the great historical irony that the "prokaryote," in both its organizational and phylogenetic senses, was defined (negatively) on the basis of structure. Finally, we see how phylogenetic research based on 16S rRNA led by Carl Woese and his collaborators confronted the prokaryote concept while moving microbiology to the center of evolutionary biology.     

Where is the root of the universal tree of life?

The currently accepted universal tree of life based on molecular phylogenies is characterised by a prokaryotic root and the sisterhood of archaea and eukaryotes. The recent discovery that each domain (bacteria, archaea, and eucarya) represents a mosaic of the two others in terms of its gene content has suggested various alternatives in which eukaryotes were derived from the merging of bacteria and archaea. In all these scenarios, life evolved from simple prokaryotes to complex eukaryotes. We argue here that these models are biased by overconfidence in molecular phylogenies and prejudices regarding the primitive nature of prokaryotes. We propose instead a universal tree of life with the root in the eukaryotic branch and suggest that many prokaryotic features of the information processing mechanisms originated by simplification through gene loss and non-orthologous displacement.     

Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes and between prokaryotes and eukaryotes

The evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes and between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is examined based on protein sequence data. Phylogenies and common signature sequences in some of the most conserved proteins point to a close evolutionary relationship between Archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria. The monophyletic nature and distinctness of the Archaebacterial domain is not supported by many of the phylogenies. Within Gram-negative bacteria, cyanobacteria are indicated as the deepest branching lineage, and a clade consisting of Archaebacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and cyanobacteria is supported by signature sequences in many proteins. However, the division within the prokaryotic species viz. Archaebacteria Gram-positive bacteria Cyanobacteria other groups of Gram-negative bacteria, is indicated to be not very rigid but, instead is an evolutionary continuum. It is expected that certain species will be found which represent intermediates in the above transitions. By contrast to the evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes, the eukaryotic species, which are structurally very different, appear to have originated by a very different mechanism. Protein phylogenies and signature sequences provide evidence that the eukaryotic nuclear genome is a chimera which has received major contributions from both an Archaebacterium and a Gram-negative bacterium. To explain these observations, it is suggested that the ancestral eukaryotic cell arose by a symbiotic fusion event between the above parents and that this fusion event led to the origin of both nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum. The monophyletic nature of all extant eukaryotic species further suggests that a 'successful primary fusion' between the prokaryotic species that gave rise to the ancestral eukaryotic cell took place only once in the history of this planet.     

The evolutionary repertoires of the eukaryotic-type ABC transporters in terms of the phylogeny of ATP-binding domains in eukaryotes and prokaryotes

ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporters play an important role in the communication of various substrates across cell membranes. They are ubiquitous in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and eukaryotic types (EK-types) are distinguished from prokaryotic types (PK-types) in terms of their genes and domain organizations. The EK-types and PK-types mainly consist of exporters and importers, respectively. Prokaryotes have both the EK-types and the PK-types. The EK-types in prokaryotes are usually called "bacterial multidrug ABC transporters," but they are not well characterized in comparison with the multidrug ABC transporters in eukaryotes. Thus, an exhaustive search of the EK-types among diverse organisms and detailed sequence classification and analysis would elucidate the evolutionary history of EK-types. It would also help shed some light on the fundamental repertoires of the wide variety of substrates through which multidrug ABC transporters in eukaryotes communicate. In this work, we have identified the EK-type ABC transporters in 126 prokaryotes using the profiles of the ATP-binding domain (NBD) of the EK-type ABC transporters from 12 eukaryotes. As a result, 11 clusters were identified from 1,046 EK-types ABC transporters. In particular, two large novel clusters emerged, corresponding to the bacterial multidrug ABC transporters related to the ABCB and ABCC families in eukaryotes, respectively. In the genomic context, most of these genes are located alone or adjacent to genes from the same clusters. Additionally, to detect functional divergences in the NBDs, the Kullback-Leibler divergence was measured among these bacterial multidrug transporters. As a result, several putative functional regions were identified, some corresponding to the predicted secondary structures. We also analyzed a phylogeny of the EK-type ABC transporters in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, which revealed that the EK-type ABC transporters in prokaryotes have certain repertoires corresponding to the conventional ABC protein groups in eukaryotes. On the basis of these findings, we propose an updated evolutionary hypothesis in which the EK-type ABC transporters in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes consisted of several kinds of ABC transporters in putative ancestor cells before the divergence of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.     

A New Aspect to the Origin and Evolution of Eukaryotes

One of the most important omissions in recent evolutionary theory concerns how eukaryotes could emerge and evolve. According to the currently accepted views, the first eukaryotic cell possessed a nucleus, an endomembrane system, and a cytoskeleton but had an inefficient prokaryotic-like metabolism. In contrast, one of the most ancient eukaryotes, the metamonada Giardia lamblia, was found to have formerly possessed mitochondria. In sharp contrast with the traditional views, this paper suggests, based on the energetic aspect of genome organization, that the emergence of eukaryotes was promoted by the establishment of an efficient energy-converting organelle, such as the mitochondrion. Mitochondria were acquired by the endosymbiosis of ancient α-purple photosynthetic Gram-negative eubacteria that reorganized the prokaryotic metabolism of the archaebacterial-like ancestral host cells. The presence of an ATP pool in the cytoplasm provided by this cell organelle allowed a major increase in genome size. This evolutionary change, the remarkable increase both in genome size and complexity, explains the origin of the eukaryotic cell itself. The loss of cell wall and the appearance of multicellularity can also be explained by the acquisition of mitochondria. All bacteria use chemiosmotic mechanisms to harness energy; therefore the periplasm bounded by the cell wall is an essential part of prokaryotic cells. Following the establishment of mitochondria, the original plasma membrane-bound metabolism of prokaryotes, as well as the funcion of the periplasm providing a compartment for the formation of different ion gradients, has been transferred into the inner mitochondrial membrane and intermembrane space. After the loss of the essential function of periplasm, the bacterial cell wall could also be lost, which enabled the naked cells to establish direct connections among themselves. The relatively late emergence of mitochondria may be the reason why multicellularity evolved so slowly. Received: 29 May 1997 / Accepted: 9 October 1997     

Cytokinesis in prokaryotes and eukaryotes: common principles and different solutions.

Cytokinesis requires duplication of cellular structures followed by bipolarization of the predivisional cell. As a common principle, this applies to prokaryotes as well as eukaryotes. With respect to eukaryotes, the discussion has focused mainly on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Escherichia coli and to a lesser extent Bacillus subtilis have been used as prokaryotic examples. To establish a bipolar cell, duplication of a eukaryotic origin of DNA replication as well as its genome is not sufficient. Duplication of the microtubule-organizing center is required as a prelude to mitosis, and it is here that the dynamic cytoskeleton with all its associated proteins comes to the fore. In prokaryotes, a cytoskeleton that pervades the cytoplasm appears to be absent. DNA replication and the concomitant DNA segregation seem to occur without help from extensive cytosolic supramacromolecular assemblies but with help from the elongating cellular envelope. Prokaryotic cytokinesis proceeds through a contracting ring, which has a roughly 100-fold-smaller circumference than its eukaryotic counterpart. Although the ring contains proteins that can be considered as predecessors of actin, tubulin, and microtubule-associated proteins, its macromolecular composition is essentially different.     

Cytokinesis in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes: Common Principles and Different Solutions

Cytokinesis requires duplication of cellular structures followed by bipolarization of the predivisional cell. As a common principle, this applies to prokaryotes as well as eukaryotes. With respect to eukaryotes, the discussion has focused mainly on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Escherichia coli and to a lesser extent Bacillus subtilis have been used as prokaryotic examples. To establish a bipolar cell, duplication of a eukaryotic origin of DNA replication as well as its genome is not sufficient. Duplication of the microtubule-organizing center is required as a prelude to mitosis, and it is here that the dynamic cytoskeleton with all its associated proteins comes to the fore. In prokaryotes, a cytoskeleton that pervades the cytoplasm appears to be absent. DNA replication and the concomitant DNA segregation seem to occur without help from extensive cytosolic supramacromolecular assemblies but with help from the elongating cellular envelope. Prokaryotic cytokinesis proceeds through a contracting ring, which has a roughly 100-fold-smaller circumference than its eukaryotic counterpart. Although the ring contains proteins that can be considered as predecessors of actin, tubulin, and microtubule-associated proteins, its macromolecular composition is essentially different.     

FtsZ and the division of prokaryotic cells and organelles

Binary fission of many prokaryotes as well as some eukaryotic organelles depends on the FtsZ protein, which self-assembles into a membrane-associated ring structure early in the division process. FtsZ is homologous to tubulin, the building block of the microtubule cytoskeleton in eukaryotes. Recent advances in genomics and cell-imaging techniques have paved the way for the remarkable progress in our understanding of fission in bacteria and organelles.     

Bacterial actins? An evolutionary perspective

According to the conventional wisdom, the existence of a cytoskeleton in eukaryotes and its absence in prokaryotes constitute a fundamental divide between the two domains of life. An integral part of the dogma is that a cytoskeleton enabled an early eukaryote to feed upon prokaryotes, a consequence of which was the occasional endosymbiosis and the eventual evolution of organelles. Two recent papers1, 2 present compelling evidence that actin, one of the principal components of a cytoskeleton, has a homolog in Bacteria that behaves in many ways like eukaryotic actin. Sequence comparisons reveal that eukaryotic actin and the bacterialhomolog (mreB protein), unlike many other proteins common to eukaryotes and Bacteria, have very different and more highly extended evolutionary histories.     

The evolution of the cytoskeleton

The cytoskeleton is a system of intracellular filaments crucial for cell shape, division, and function in all three domains of life. The simple cytoskeletons of prokaryotes show surprising plasticity in composition, with none of the core filament-forming proteins conserved in all lineages. In contrast, eukaryotic cytoskeletal function has been hugely elaborated by the addition of accessory proteins and extensive gene duplication and specialization. Much of this complexity evolved before the last common ancestor of eukaryotes. The distribution of cytoskeletal filaments puts constraints on the likely prokaryotic line that made this leap of eukaryogenesis.     

Cytoskeletal elements in bacteria

It has become clear recently that bacteria contain all of the cytoskeletal elements that are found in eukaryotic cells, demonstrating that the cytoskeleton has not been a eukaryotic invention, but evolved early in evolution. Several proteins that are involved in cell division, cell structure and DNA partitioning have been found to form highly dynamic ring structures or helical filaments underneath the cell membrane or throughout the length of the cell. These exciting findings indicate that several highly dynamic processes occur within prokaryotic cells, during growth or differentiation, that are vital for a wide range of cellular tasks.     

Glycoproteins in prokaryotes

Rather recently it has become clear that prokaryotes (Archaea and Bacteria) are able to glycosylate proteins. A literature survey revealed the different types of glycoproteins. They include mainly surface layer (S-layer) proteins, flagellins, and polysaccharide-degrading enzymes. Only in a few cases is structural information available. Many different structures have been observed that display much more variation than that observed in eukaryotes. A few studies have given evidence for the function of the prokaryotic glycoprotein glycans. Also from the biosynthetic point of view, information is rather scarce. Due to their different cell structure, prokaryotes have to use mechanisms different from those found in eukaryotes to glycosylate proteins. However, from the fragmented data available for the prokaryotic glycoproteins, similarities with the eukaryotic system can be noticed. Received: 24 February 1997 / Accepted: 13 May 1997     

Argonaute Proteins and Mechanisms of RNA Interference in Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes

Noncoding RNAs play essential roles in genetic regulation in all organisms. In eukaryotic cells, many small non-coding RNAs act in complex with Argonaute proteins and regulate gene expression by recognizing complementary RNA targets. The complexes of Argonaute proteins with small RNAs also play a key role in silencing of mobile genetic elements and, in some cases, viruses. These processes are collectively called RNA interference. RNA interference is a powerful tool for specific gene silencing in both basic research and therapeutic applications. Argonaute proteins are also found in prokaryotic organisms. Recent studies have shown that prokaryotic Argonautes can also cleave their target nucleic acids, in particular DNA. This activity of prokaryotic Argonautes might potentially be used to edit eukaryotic genomes. However, the molecular mechanisms of small nucleic acid biogenesis and the functions of Argonaute proteins, in particular in bacteria and archaea, remain largely unknown. Here we briefly review available data on the RNA interference processes and Argonaute proteins in eukaryotes and prokaryotes.     

Origin of phagotrophic eukaryotes as social cheaters in microbial biofilms

Background  

The origin of eukaryotic cells was one of the most dramatic evolutionary transitions in the history of life. It is generally assumed that eukaryotes evolved later then prokaryotes by the transformation or fusion of prokaryotic lineages. However, as yet there is no consensus regarding the nature of the prokaryotic group(s) ancestral to eukaryotes. Regardless of this, a hardly debatable fundamental novel characteristic of the last eukaryotic common ancestor was the ability to exploit prokaryotic biomass by the ingestion of entire cells, i.e. phagocytosis. The recent advances in our understanding of the social life of prokaryotes may help to explain the origin of this form of total exploitation.     

Calcium signalling in bacteria

Whereas the importance of calcium as a cell regulator is well established in eukaryotes, the role of calcium in prokaryotes is still elusive. Over the past few years, there has been an increased interest in the role of calcium in bacteria. It has been demonstrated that as in eukaryotic organisms, the intracellular calcium concentration in prokaryotes is tightly regulated ranging from 100 to 300 nM. It has been found that calcium ions are involved in the maintenance of cell structure, motility, transport and cell differentiation processes such as sporulation, heterocyst formation and fruiting body development. In addition, a number of calcium-binding proteins have been isolated in several prokaryotic organisms. The characterization of these proteins and the identification of other factors suggest the possibility that calcium signal transduction exists in bacteria. This review presents recent developments of calcium in bacteria as it relates to signal transduction.