以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析

目的:本研究的目的是评估以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析。方法:112例通过快速尿素酶试验和13C-尿素呼气试验证实感染了幽门螺杆菌的非溃疡性消化不良的患者入组本实验,患者被随机分为7d组(54例)和14d组(58例),接受包括雷贝拉唑(10mgb.i.d.)加左氧氟沙星(500mgq.d.)和阿莫西林(1000mgb.i.d.)的治疗,并进行6周的随访,治疗结束至少4周后通过13C-尿素呼气试验确定根除率。结果:幽门螺杆菌总的根除率为83.9%(ITT)和88.7%(PP)。7d组51名患者完成了治疗,其根除率为75.9%(ITT)、80.4%(PP),而14d组的根除率达到91.4%(ITT)、96.4%(PP),P<0.05。结论:包含雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林的三联疗法对于根除幽门螺杆菌是有效的,但相同方案的14d疗法疗效明显优于7d疗法。     

以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析

目的：本研究的目的是评估以左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效分析。方法：112例通过快速尿素酶试验和13C．尿素呼气试验证实感染了幽门螺杆菌的非溃疡性消化不良的患者入组本实验,患者被随机分为7d组（54例）和14d组（58例）,接受包括雷贝拉唑Oomgb-i．d．）加左氧氟沙星（500mgq．d．）和阿莫西林（1000mgb．i．d．）的治疗,并进行6周的随访,治疗结束至少4周后通过13C．尿素呼气试验确定根除率。结果：幽门螺杆菌总的根除率为83．9％（ITT）和88．7％（PP）。7d组51名患者完成了治疗。其根除率为75．9％（ITT）、80．4％（PP）,而14d组的根除率达到91．4％（ITT）、96．4％（PP）,P〈0．05。结论：包含雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林的三联疗法对于根除幽门螺杆菌是有效的,但相同方案的14d疗法疗效明显优于7d疗法。     

雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡100例临床疗效治疗

目的:观察雷贝拉唑联用克拉霉素、阿莫西林胶囊治疗良性溃疡疗效.方法:100例良性溃疡病人随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林治疗,对照组采用照组用奥美拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林三联疗法,4周后复查胃镜、检测Hp并复查血、尿常规及肝肾功能.结果:治疗组有效率为94％,对照组有效率为80％,两者有显著性差异(P＜0.05);治疗组Hp转阴率为88％,显著高于对照组的转阴率72％(P＜0.05).结论:雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡疗效高,无明显毒副作用,值得临床推广应用.     

不同剂量埃索美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌中的疗效观察

目的:研究不同剂量埃索美拉唑的三联疗法根治幽门螺杆菌的临床疗效。方法:选取2012年12月到2014年12月我院收治的幽门螺杆菌阳性胃炎患者100例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为高剂量组(n=50)和低剂量组(n=50),低剂量组给予阿莫西林(1 g/次)+克拉霉素(0.5 g/次)+埃索美拉唑(20 mg/次)治疗,而高剂量组埃索美拉唑改为40 mg/次,疗程均1个月。比较两组幽门螺杆菌清除率,及治疗前后发生反酸、上腹痛和腹胀的临床症状评分以及治疗后不良反应发生情况。结果:高剂量组患者的幽门螺杆菌清除率为92.0%,显著高于低剂量组的70.0%(P0.05);治疗后两组临床症状评分均显著低于治疗前(P0.05),且高剂量组显著低于低剂量组(P0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:高剂量较低剂量埃索美拉唑三联疗法能更有效根除幽门螺杆菌,改善患者的临床症状,且不会增加不良反应,值得在临床上借鉴。     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。     

益生菌联合四联疗法对幽门螺杆菌感染补救治疗的疗效分析

目的 评价联合应用益生菌在标准四联疗法的不同阶段对幽门螺杆菌（H. pylori）感染补救治疗的疗效。方法 采用回顾性研究,收集首次根除失败因病情需要接受H.pylori补救根除治疗的患者共200例,随机分为4个治疗组,所有患者均采用标准四联疗法（每次服用埃索美拉唑钠肠溶片20 mg＋枸橼酸铋钾220 mg＋阿莫西林1 000 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg）进行治疗。其中A组为单纯四联治疗,不加服金双歧;B组为四联治疗前2周服用金双歧2 000 mg/次;C组为标准四联治疗同时服用金双歧2 000 mg/次;D组为四联治疗结束后开始加用金双歧2 000 mg/次。疗程均为2周,所有患者均随访至少4周,记录其治疗期间发生的不良反应及症状。疗程结束4周后采用13C尿素呼气试验判断H. pylori是否根除。结果 A组、B组、C组和D组患者ITT分析的根除率分别为78.0%（38/50）、80.0%（40/50）、74.0%（37/50）和72.0%（36/50）,差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.096,P=0.778）;4组患者PP分析的根除率分别为81.3%（39/48）、85.1%（40/47）、78.7%（37/47）和78.3%（36/46）,差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.891,P=0.828）。4组患者7 d、14 d不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 含呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林的标准四联疗法治疗H. pylori感染根除率较高（>80％）,可作为首次根除治疗失败后的补救治疗方案,在补救治疗的不同时期加用益生菌并不能明显提高根除率,但能降低7 d、14 d治疗期间的不良反应发生率。     

雷贝拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效观察

目的:治疗雷贝拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗返流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法:108例反流性食管炎患者随机分成两组,治疗组56例和奥美拉唑对照组52例,治疗组应用雷贝拉唑和莫沙必利,对照组应用奥美拉唑和莫沙必利,观察治疗前后患者的临床症改善和内镜变化。结果:治疗8周,治疗组症状积分明显优于对照组(P<0.05),治疗组疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.05),胃镜检查结果示治疗组食管黏膜愈合情况优于对照组(P<0.5)。结论:雷贝拉唑和莫沙必利联用治疗反流性食管炎临床症状明显改善,联合用药临床疗效优于奥美拉唑。     

布拉氏酵母菌散剂联合三联疗法对儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗

目的 观察布拉氏酵母菌散剂联合以质子泵抑制剂（PPI）为基础的标准三联疗法对儿童幽门螺杆菌（H. pylori）感染的疗效,以探索根除率高且不良反应少的H. pylori根除方案。方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究,从确诊为H. pylori感染的患儿中选取120例作为研究对象,再随机分为布拉氏组和标准三联疗法组,每组各60例。标准三联疗法组口服阿莫西林［50 mg/（kg·d）,饭后分两次服］、克拉霉素［20 mg/（kg·d）,饭后分两次服］和奥美拉唑［0.7~0.8 mg/（kg·d）,饭前半小时一次服完］治疗,布拉氏组在标准三联疗法的基础上加服布拉氏酵母菌散剂（250 mg/次,2次/d）。两组患者均治疗14 d,由患儿家属记录治疗过程中发生不良反应的情况。停药后4周内不再口服任何抗生素,后行14C呼气试验以评估H. pylori根除情况。比较两组患者根除率及不良反应发生率。 结果 治疗后三联疗法组H. pylori根除率为76.7%（46/60）,布拉氏组为90.0%（54/60）,二者差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。治疗过程中布拉氏组患者腹泻发生率低于三联疗法组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 布拉酵母联合三联疗法能提高H. pylori的根除率,降低治疗过程中的不良反应。     

埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗复发性消化性溃疡临床对比研究

目的:比较埃索美拉唑三联与奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性复发性消化性溃疡的临床疗效.方法:将90例经内镜诊断并检测证实Hp阳性的复发性消化性溃疡患者随机分为两组.A组(45例):埃索美拉唑20 mg 羟氨苄青霉素l g 黄连素300 mg,每日2次,共7 d;B组(45例):奥美拉唑20 mg 羟氨苄青霉素1 g 克拉霉素500 mg,每日2次,共7 d.疗程结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及用药后的不良反应等.结果:埃索美拉唑组第1天和第2天腹痛缓解率分别为34.6%和59.6%,高于奥美拉唑组的17.3%和38.5%(P＜0.05 o埃索美拉唑组和奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为92-3%和88.5%,Hp根除率分别为88.5%和82.7%,差异无显著性(P＞0.05).两组用药后不良反应少,有较好的安全性.结论:埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的复发性消化性溃疡安全有效,腹痛缓解速度优于奥美拉唑三联疗法.     

中药芪莪合剂联合西药补救治疗H.pylori感染消化道疾病的临床疗效

观察中药芪莪合剂联合西药补救治疗幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)感染上消化道疾病的临床疗效,探讨其临床应用价值。对182例常规抗H.pylori治疗清除失败的上消化道疾病患者,随机分为单用西药组(14 d四联疗法)和中西药联合组(14 d四联疗法+中药芪莪合剂10剂),疗程结束后消化性溃疡患者继服埃索美拉唑14 d,并胃镜观察溃疡及糜烂愈合情况,随访症状缓解及不良反应情况;治疗结束后4周复查~(14)CUBT或~(13)C-UBT,观察H.pylori清除率。结果显示,H.pylori清除率按意向性治疗(ITT)和试验方案(PP)分析在中西药联合组分别为86.8%和89.8%,单用西药组分别为73.6%和78.8%,PP分析两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05);中西药联合组溃疡和糜烂治愈率分别为90.0%和80.6%,单用西药组分别为64.3%和48.5%(P0.05);中西药联合组的症状缓解率为97.7%,高于单用西药组(85.7%,P0.05);两组不良反应发生率无统计学差异(10.2%vs 15.3%,P0.05)。结果表明,采用中药芪莪合剂联合西药补救治疗能获得较高的H.pylori清除率,并能有效治愈溃疡和糜烂,缓解临床症状,且副反应发生率低。     

High Efficacy of 14‐Day Triple Therapy‐Based,Bismuth‐Containing Quadruple Therapy for Initial Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: The success rate of currently recommended 7‐day triple therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin has fallen into the unacceptable range. It is urgent to look for a new strategy to treat the infection of Helicobacter pylori. Aims: To observe the efficacy of triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori treatment. Methods: A total of 160 patients with functional dyspepsia who were Hp+ were randomly assigned into two groups. Regimen: Omeprazole 20 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Clarithromycin 500 mg and Bismuth Potassium Citrate 220 mg, twice a day. Eighty patients received 7‐day quadruple therapy and 80 patients received the same therapy for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin of clinical isolates were determined by the twofold agar dilution method. Results: Fourteen‐day therapy led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 7‐day therapy in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (93.7 vs 80.0%; p = .01), and the per‐protocol analysis (97.4 vs 82.0%; p = .0016). The H. pylori resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 42.1, 18.0 and 0%. Fourteen‐day therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusions: Addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and decrease the bacterial load. Fourteen‐day triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy achieved ITT success rate 93% and could be recommended as the first line eradication regimen.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

益生菌联合三联疗法治疗小儿幽门螺杆菌相关性胃炎的疗效及对炎性因子的影响

摘要 目的：探讨益生菌联合三联疗法治疗小儿幽门螺杆菌（HP）相关性胃炎的疗效及对炎性因子的影响。方法：选取2017年1月~2018年6月期间我院收治的HP相关性胃炎患儿93例,根据乱数表法将患儿分为研究组（n=47）、对照组（n=46）,对照组患儿给予三联疗法治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上联合益生菌治疗,比较两组患儿临床疗效、临床症状总评分、炎性因子、HP根除率、不良反应发生率及复发率。结果：治疗1个月后,研究组的临床总有效率为87.23%（41/47）,高于对照组的69.57%（32/46）（P<0.05）。两组治疗2周后、1个月后的临床症状总评分及治疗1个月后血清肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）、超敏C反应蛋白（hs-CRP）、白介素-6（IL-6）水平均下降（P＜0.05）,且研究组低于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组HP根除率高于对照组（P<0.05）。两组不良反应发生率及复发率比较无差异（P>0.05）。结论：益生菌联合三联疗法治疗小儿HP相关性胃炎的疗效确切,可改善患儿的临床症状,降低炎性因子水平,且用药安全性较好。     

Rabeprazole Can Overcome the Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Quadruple Therapy

Objectives: The prospective study was designed to clarify the impact of CYP2C19 on quadruple therapies and survey the efficacies of rabeprazole‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. Patients and Methods: From January 2007 to March 2009, 1055 H. pylori‐infected patients received standard triple regimens (proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 865 (81.9%) subjects. One hundred ninety eradication‐failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7‐day eradication therapy. Ninety‐six patients were treated with esomeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (EB), while 94 patients were treated with rabeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (RB). Follow‐up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients’ responses, CYP2C19 genotypes, and antibiotics resistances were also examined. Results: Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed that RB had better eradication rates than EB (EB: 72.9%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.9% and RB: 78.7%; 95% CI 72.5–84.9%) (p value = .543). Per‐protocol results were EB = 75.3%; 95% CI: 70.3–80.3% and RB = 85.1%; 95% CI: 80.6–89.6% (p value = .0401). Both regimens had similar compliance (p value = 0.155) and adverse events (p value = 0.219). We also surveyed those patients without resistance of any antibiotics. RB still showed better outcome than EB. Our data showed that esomeprazole‐based regimen and CYP2C19 Hom EM genotype were important predictors for eradication failure. Conclusions: In quadruple therapy, rabeprazole‐based regimens had better efficacy than esomeprazole‐based regimens. CYP2C19 polymorphism also played an important role in quadruple therapy. It seems advisable to change PPI to rabeprazole in second‐line quadruple therapy.     

序贯疗法联合布拉氏酵母菌根除儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效评价

摘要 目的：探讨布拉氏酵母菌联合序贯疗法根除儿童幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染的疗效。方法：选取2020年1月～2022年6月期间佛山市妇幼保健院就诊的Hp感染患儿100例,均进行胃镜下胃黏膜病变程度评分。按照随机数字表法将患儿分为观察组（n=50,序贯疗法联合布拉氏酵母菌）和对照组（n=50,序贯疗法）,均治疗10 d。比较两组治疗前、治疗10 d后免疫功能相关指标、炎症因子指标以及不良反应发生率,并比较治疗后4周的Hp根除率以及治疗前、治疗后4周的胃黏膜病变程度评分。结果：观察组的临床总有效率、Hp根除率高于对照组,胃黏膜病变程度评分优于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗10 d后,两组CD3⁺、CD4⁺、CD4⁺/CD8⁺升高,且观察组高于对照组,CD8⁺降低,且观察组低于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗10 d后,两组白细胞介素（IL）-10升高,且观察组高于对照组,IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）、干扰素-γ（IFN-γ）降低,且观察组低于对照组（P<0.05）。两组不良反应发生率对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：序贯疗法联合布拉氏酵母菌用于根除儿童Hp感染治疗,可减轻胃黏膜病变程度,改善患儿的免疫功能和炎症因子水平,提高Hp根除率。