At a crossroads: human DNA tumor viruses and the host DNA damage response

Human DNA tumor viruses induce host cell proliferation in order to establish the necessary cellular milieu to replicate viral DNA. The consequence of such viral-programmed induction of proliferation coupled with the introduction of foreign replicating DNA structures makes these viruses particularly sensitive to the host DNA damage response machinery. In fact, sensors of DNA damage are often activated and modulated by DNA tumor viruses in both latent and lytic infection. This article focuses on the role of the DNA damage response during the life cycle of human DNA tumor viruses, with a particular emphasis on recent advances in our understanding of the role of the DNA damage response in EBV, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus and human papillomavirus infection.     

DNA oxidative damage in mammalian spermatozoa: where and why is the male nucleus affected?

Gamete DNA integrity is one key parameter conditioning reproductive success as well as the quality of life for the offspring. In particular, damage to the male nucleus can have profound negative effects on the outcome of fertilization. Because of the absence of repair activity of the quiescent mature spermatozoa it is easily subjected to nuclear damage, of which oxidative damage is by far the most prominent. In relation to the organization of the mammalian sperm nucleus we show here that one can correlate the nuclear regions of lower compaction with areas preferentially showing oxidative damage. More precisely, we show that oxidative DNA damage targets primarily histone-rich and nuclear matrix-attached domains located in the peripheral and basal regions of the mouse sperm nucleus. These particular sperm DNA domains were recently shown to be enriched in genes of paramount importance in postfertilization DNA replication events and in the onset of the embryonic developmental program. We propose that monitoring of sperm DNA oxidation using the type of assay presented here should be considered in clinical practice when one wants to estimate the integrity of the paternal nucleus along with more classical assays that essentially analyze DNA fragmentation and nucleus compaction.     

Oxidative stress,DNA damage,and the telomeric complex as therapeutic targets in acute neurodegeneration

Oxidative stress has been identified as an important contributor to neurodegeneration associated with acute CNS injuries and diseases such as spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and ischemic stroke. In this review, we briefly detail the damaging effects of oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, etc.) with a particular emphasis on DNA damage. Evidence for DNA damage in acute CNS injuries is presented along with its downstream effects on neuronal viability. In particular, unchecked oxidative DNA damage initiates a series of signaling events (e.g. activation of p53 and PARP-1, cell cycle re-activation) which have been shown to promote neuronal loss following CNS injury. These findings suggest that preventing DNA damage might be an effective way to promote neuronal survival and enhance neurological recovery in these conditions. Finally, we identify the telomere and telomere-associated proteins (e.g. telomerase) as novel therapeutic targets in the treatment of neurodegeneration due to their ability to modulate the neuronal response to both oxidative stress and DNA damage.     

Histone H3 K56 acetylation, chromatin assembly, and the DNA damage checkpoint

The role of chromatin and its modulation during DNA repair has become increasingly understood in recent years. A number of histone modifications that contribute towards the cellular response to DNA damage have been identified, including the acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 56. H3 K56 acetylation occurs normally during S phase, but persists in the presence of DNA damage. In the absence of this modification, cellular survival following DNA damage is impaired. Two recent reports provide additional insights into how H3 K56 acetylation functions in DNA damage responses. In particular, this modification appears to be important for both normal replication-coupled nucleosome assembly as well as nucleosome assembly at sites of DNA damage following repair.     

Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.     

Basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage, DNA repair efficacy and mutagen sensitivity in breast cancer

Impaired DNA repair may fuel up malignant transformation of breast cells due to the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in target genes and increasing susceptibility to exogenous carcinogens. Moreover, the effectiveness of DNA repair may contribute to failure of chemotherapy and resistance of breast cancer cells to drugs and radiation. The breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA repair. To evaluate further the role of DNA repair in breast cancer we determined: (1) the kinetics of removal of DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide and the anticancer drug doxorubicin, and (2) the level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage before and during/after chemotherapy in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. The level of DNA damage and the kinetics of DNA repair were evaluated by alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Oxidative and alkylative DNA damage were assayed with the use of DNA repair enzymes endonuclease III (Endo III) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), recognizing oxidized DNA bases and 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) recognizing alkylated bases. We observed slower kinetics of DNA repair after treatment with hydrogen peroxide and doxorubicin in lymphocytes of breast cancer patients compared to control individuals. The level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage was higher in breast cancer patients than in the control and the difference was more pronounced when patients after chemotherapy were engaged, but usually the level of DNA damage in these patients was too high to be measured with our system. Our results indicate that peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients have more damaged DNA and display decreased DNA repair efficacy. Therefore, these features can be considered as risk markers for breast cancer, but the question whether they are the cause or a consequence of the illness remains open. Nevertheless, our results suggest that research on the mutagen sensitivity and efficacy of DNA repair could impact the development of new diagnostic and screening strategies as well as indicate new targets to prevent and cure cancer. Moreover, the comet assay may be applied to evaluate the suitability of a particular mode of chemotherapy to a particular cancer patient.     

Strand-specific binding of RPA and XPA to damaged duplex DNA

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is a major pathway used to repair bulky adduct DNA damage. Two proteins, xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA), have been implicated in the role of DNA damage recognition in the NER pathway. The particular manner in which these two damage recognition proteins align themselves with respect to a damaged DNA site was assessed using photoreactive base analogues within specific DNA substrates to allow site-specific cross-linking of the damage recognition proteins. Results of these studies demonstrate that both RPA and XPA are in close proximity to the adduct as measured by cross-linking of each protein directly to the platinum moiety. Additional studies demonstrate that XPA contacts both the damaged and undamaged strands of the duplex DNA. Direct evidence is presented demonstrating preferential binding of RPA to the undamaged strand of a duplex damaged DNA molecule.     

Chromatin plasticity in response to DNA damage: The shape of things to come

DNA damage poses a major threat to cell function and viability by compromising both genome and epigenome integrity. The DNA damage response indeed operates in the context of chromatin and relies on dynamic changes in chromatin organization. Here, we review the molecular bases of chromatin alterations in response to DNA damage, focusing on core histone mobilization in mammalian cells. Building on our current view of nucleosome dynamics in response to DNA damage, we highlight open challenges and avenues for future development. In particular, we discuss the different levels of regulation of chromatin plasticity during the DNA damage response and their potential impact on cell function and epigenome maintenance.     

Role of SUMO/Ubc9 in DNA Damage Repair and Tumorigenesis

DNA damage repair is an important cell function for genome integrity and its deregulation can lead to genomic instability and development of malignancies. Sumoylation is an increasingly important ubiquitin-like modification of proteins affecting protein stability, enzymatic activity, nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, and protein-protein interactions. In particular, several important DNA repair enzymes are subject to sumoylation, which appears to play a role in copping with DNA damage insults. Recent reports indicate that Ubc9, the single SUMO E2 enzyme catalyzing the conjugation of SUMO to target proteins, is overexpressed in certain tumors, such as lung adenocarcinoma, ovarian carcinoma and melanoma, suggestive of its clinic significance. This review summarizes the most important DNA damage repair pathways which are potentially affected by Ubc9/SUMO and their role in regulating the function of several proteins involved in the DNA damage repair machinery.     

Inactivating UBE2M Impacts the DNA Damage Response and Genome Integrity Involving Multiple Cullin Ligases

Protein neddylation is involved in a wide variety of cellular processes. Here we show that the DNA damage response is perturbed in cells inactivated with an E2 Nedd8 conjugating enzyme UBE2M, measured by RAD51 foci formation kinetics and cell based DNA repair assays. UBE2M knockdown increases DNA breakages and cellular sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, further suggesting heightened genomic instability and defective DNA repair activity. Investigating the downstream Cullin targets of UBE2M revealed that silencing of Cullin 1, 2, and 4 ligases incurred significant DNA damage. In particular, UBE2M knockdown, or defective neddylation of Cullin 2, leads to a blockade in the G1 to S progression and is associated with delayed S-phase dependent DNA damage response. Cullin 4 inactivation leads to an aberrantly high DNA damage response that is associated with increased DNA breakages and sensitivity of cells to DNA damaging agents, suggesting a DNA repair defect is associated. siRNA interrogation of key Cullin substrates show that CDT1, p21, and Claspin are involved in elevated DNA damage in the UBE2M knockdown cells. Therefore, UBE2M is required to maintain genome integrity by activating multiple Cullin ligases throughout the cell cycle.     

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in regulation of chromatin structure and the DNA damage response

Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) is a post-translational modification of proteins and is synthesised by PAR polymerases (PARPs), which have long been associated with the coordination of the cellular response to DNA damage, amongst other processes. Binding of some PARPs such as PARP1 to broken DNA induces a substantial wave of PARylation, which results in significant re-structuring of the chromatin microenvironment through modification of chromatin-associated proteins and recruitment of chromatin-modifying proteins. Similarly, other DNA damage response proteins are recruited to the damaged sites via PAR-specific binding modules, and in this way, PAR mediates not only local chromatin architecture but also DNA repair. Here, we discuss the expanding role of PAR in the DNA damage response, with particular focus on chromatin regulation.     

Chromatin dynamics after DNA damage: The legacy of the access–repair–restore model

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into chromatin, which is the physiological substrate for all DNA transactions, including DNA damage and repair. Chromatin organization imposes major constraints on DNA damage repair and thus undergoes critical rearrangements during the repair process. These rearrangements have been integrated into the “access–repair–restore” (ARR) model, which provides a molecular framework for chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage. Here, we take a historical perspective on the elaboration of this model and describe the molecular players involved in damaged chromatin reorganization in human cells. In particular, we present our current knowledge of chromatin assembly coupled to DNA damage repair, focusing on the role of histone variants and their dedicated chaperones. Finally, we discuss the impact of chromatin rearrangements after DNA damage on chromatin function and epigenome maintenance.     

The DNA helicase and adenosine triphosphatase activities of yeast Rad3 protein are inhibited by DNA damage. A potential mechanism for damage-specific recognition.

Purified Rad3 protein from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase and also acts as a DNA helicase on partially duplex DNA. In this study we show that the DNA helicase activity is inhibited when a partially duplex circular DNA substrate is exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Inhibition of DNA helicase activity is sensitive to the particular strand of the duplex region which carries the damage. Inhibition is retained if the single-stranded circle is irradiated prior to annealing to an unirradiated oligonucleotide, but not if a UV-irradiated oligonucleotide is annealed to unirradiated circular single-stranded DNA. UV irradiation of single-stranded DNA or deoxyribonucleotide homopolymers also inhibits the ability of these polynucleotides to support the hydrolysis of ATP by Rad3 protein. UV radiation damage apparently blocks translocation of Rad3 protein and results in the formation of stable Rad3 protein-UV-irradiated DNA complexes. As a consequence, Rad3 protein remains sequestered on DNA, presumably at sites of base damage. The sensitivity of Rad3 protein to the presence of DNA damage on the strand along which it translocates provides a potential mechanism for damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair and may explain the absolute requirement for Rad3 protein for damage-specific incision of DNA in yeast.     

The oxidative DNA damage response: A review of research undertaken with Tsinghua and Xiangya students at the University of Pittsburgh

Endogenous stress and exogenous toxicants (chemicals and UV light) alter genetic information either directly or indirectly through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby driving genomic instability in cells and promoting tumorigenesis. All living cells try to faithfully preserve and transmit their genomic information from one generation to the next using DNA repair mechanisms to repair oxidative DNA damage to prevent cancer or premature aging. Oxidative DNA damage comprises a mixture of DNA lesions including base damage, DNA single strand breaks (SSBs), and DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). This review summarizes some of the studies on DNA damage response at a defined genome locus that are performed by students from the Tsinghua University School of Medicine and the School of Medicine of Central South University (Xiangya Hospital) at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. A summary of their work highlights the continuous contribution of the students to a particular research program and exemplifies the achievements of this China-U.S. collaborative training program.     

DNA Damage Leaves its Mark on Chromatin

DNA organization into chromatin has a major influence on the cellular response to DNA damage. Recent studies in various systems ranging from yeast to human cells stress the importance of chromatin not simply as a barrier to DNA repair processes but also as an active contributor to the DNA damage response. Indeed, modulations of chromatin organization involving various degrees of rearrangements, such as histone modifications and even nucleosome displacement, can promote efficient repair and also participate in checkpoint signaling. Here, we survey recent progress in delineating how chromatin rearrangements provide crosstalk with the DNA damage response. In particular, we highlight new data on histone dynamics at damage sites and discuss their functional importance for the stable propagation of specific chromatin states.     

Dynamics of plant histone modifications in response to DNA damage

DNA damage detection and repair take place in the context of chromatin, and histone proteins play important roles in these events. Post-translational modifications of histone proteins are involved in repair and DNA damage signalling processes in response to genotoxic stresses. In particular, acetylation of histones H3 and H4 plays an important role in the mammalian and yeast DNA damage response and survival under genotoxic stress. However, the role of post-translational modifications to histones during the plant DNA damage response is currently poorly understood. Several different acetylated H3 and H4 N-terminal peptides following X-ray treatment were identified using MS analysis of purified histones, revealing previously unseen patterns of histone acetylation in Arabidopsis. Immunoblot analysis revealed an increase in the relative abundance of the H3 acetylated N-terminus, and a global decrease in hyperacetylation of H4 in response to DNA damage induced by X-rays. Conversely, mutants in the key DNA damage signalling factor ATM (ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED) display increased histone acetylation upon irradiation, linking the DNA damage response with dynamic changes in histone modification in plants.     

Fission yeast Drp1 is an essential protein required for recovery from DNA damage and chromosome segregation

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most critical types of DNA damage that can leads to chromosomal aberrations, genomic instability and cancer. Several genetic disorders such as Xeroderma pigmentosum are linked with defects in DNA repair. Human Rint1, a TIP1 domain containing protein is involved in membrane trafficking but its role in DNA damage response is elusive. In this study we characterized the role of Drp1 (damage responsive protein 1), a Rint1 family protein during DNA damage response in fission yeast. We identified that Drp1 is an essential protein and indispensable for survival and growth. Using in vitro random mutagenesis approach we isolated a temperature sensitive mutant allele of drp1 gene (drp1-654) that exhibits sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, in particular to alkylation damage and UV associated DNA damage. The drp1-654 mutant cells are also sensitive to double strand break inducing agent bleomycin. Genetic interaction studies identified that Rad50 and Drp1 act in the same pathway during DNA damage response and the physical interaction of Drp1 with Rad50 was unaffected in drp1-654 mutant at permissive as well as non permissive temperature. Furthermore Drp1 was found to be required for the recovery from MMS induced DNA damage. We also demonstrated that the Drp1 protein localized to nucleus and was required to maintain the chromosome stability.     

Phenylbutyrate inhibits homologous recombination induced by camptothecin and methyl methanesulfonate

Homologous recombination is accompanied by extensive changes to chromatin organization at the site of DNA damage. Some of these changes are mediated through acetylation/deacetylation of histones. Here, we show that recombinational repair of DNA damage induced by the anti-cancer drug camptothecin (CPT) and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) is blocked by sodium phenylbutyrate (PBA) in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In particular, PBA suppresses CPT- and MMS-induced genetic recombination as well as DNA double-strand break repair during mating-type interconversion. Treatment with PBA is accompanied by a dramatic reduction in histone H4 lysine 8 acetylation. Live cell imaging of homologous recombination proteins indicates that repair of CPT-induced DNA damage is redirected to a non-recombinogenic pathway in the presence of PBA without loss in cell viability. In contrast, the suppression of MMS-induced recombination by PBA is accompanied by a dramatic loss in cell viability. Taken together, our results demonstrate that PBA inhibits DNA damage-induced homologous recombination likely by mediating changes in chromatin acetylation. Moreover, the combination of PBA with genotoxic agents can lead to different cell fates depending on the type of DNA damage inflicted.