Netrin-1 signaling for sensory axons: Involvement in sensory axonal development and regeneration

During development, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend their axons toward the dorsolateral part of the spinal cord and enter the spinal cord through the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). After entering the spinal cord, these axons project into the dorsal mantle layer after a “waiting period” of a few days. We revealed that the diffusible axonal guidance molecule netrin-1 is a chemorepellent for developing DRG axons. When DRG axons orient themselves toward the DREZ, netrin-1 proteins derived from the ventral spinal cord prevent DRG axons from projecting aberrantly toward the ventral spinal cord and help them to project correctly toward the DREZ. In addition to the ventrally derived netrin-1, the dorsal spinal cord cells adjacent to the DREZ transiently express netrin-1 proteins during the waiting period. This dorsally derived netrin-1 contributes to the correct guidance of DRG axons to prevent them from invading the dorsal spinal cord. In general, there is a complete lack of sensory axonal regeneration after a spinal cord injury, because the dorsal column lesion exerts inhibitory activities toward regenerating axons. Netrin-1 is a novel candidate for a major inhibitor of sensory axonal regeneration in the spinal cord; because its expression level stays unchanged in the lesion site following injury, and adult DRG neurons respond to netrin-1-induced axon repulsion. Although further studies are required to show the involvement of netrin-1 in preventing the regeneration of sensory axons in CNS injury, the manipulation of netrin-1-induced repulsion in the CNS lesion site may be a potent approach for the treatment of human spinal injuries.Key words: netrin-1, dorsal root ganglion, axon guidance, chemorepellent, Unc5, spinal cord, axon regenerationDeveloping axons navigate to their targets by responding to attractive and repulsive guidance cues working in a contact-dependent or diffusible fashion in their environment (reviewed in ref. ¹). During early development of the primary sensory system, centrally projecting sensory axons from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend toward the dorsolateral region of the spinal cord (Fig. 1A and C), where they enter the spinal cord exclusively through the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ), and never orient themselves toward the notochord or the ventral spinal cord (Fig. 1A; reviewed in ref. ²). We previously showed that the notochord but not the ventral spinal cord secretes semaphorin 3A (Sema3A), which is known to be a chemorepellent for DRG axons at early developmental stages (Fig. 1A).³ This is the reason why DRG axons never project toward the notochord. Along the same line, it is highly possible that the ventral spinal cord may secrete some chemorepulsive cue other than Sema3A for DRG axons.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Netrin-1 plays a critical role in sensory axonal guidance as an axon chemorepellent. (A) A schematic diagram of a thoracic transverse section of an E10 mouse embryo, summarizing the possible mechanism of netrin-1 action in early DRG axonal guidance. When DRG axons project toward the DREZ in the dorsal spinal cord (dSC), ventrally derived netrin-1 chemorepels DRG axons to prevent them from orienting aberrantly toward the ventral spinal cord (vSC) (upper). NC; notochord. In netrin-1-deficient embryos, some DRG axons misorient themselves toward the ventral spinal cord, because of the absence of netrin-1 proteins in the ventral spinal cord (lower). (B) At E12.5 when DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally (arrows) to form the dorsal funiculus (DF), netrin-1 proteins are transiently expressed in a subpopulation of dorsal spinal cord cells adjacent to the dorsal funiculus (upper). In netrin-1-deficient embryos, the dorsal funiculus is disorganized because DRG axons are no longer waiting for invading the dorsal mantle layer (lower). (C) Gain-of-function experiments by electroporation confirm the repulsive activity of netrin-1 toward DRG axons. When netrin-1 is misexpressed in the dorsal spinal cord, the number of DRG axons that enter the DREZ is significantly reduced compared with the control, because some DRG axons fail to project toward the DREZ and turn in the wrong direction.After entering the spinal cord, DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally to form the dorsal funiculus without projecting to the dorsal mantle layer for a few days (this delay of the axonal projection to the mantle layer is referred to as the ‘waiting period;’ Fig. 1B). A few days later, proprioceptive afferents of DRGs begin to send collaterals into the dorsal layers, and cutaneous afferents project ventrally through the dorsal layers.⁴ This evidence raises the possibility that some repulsive cues transiently prevent the collaterals of DRGs from penetrating the dorsal spinal cord during this waiting period.Netrins are a family of secreted proteins that play a key role in axonal guidance, cell migration, morphogenesis and angiogenesis.⁵ Netrin-1 is a bifunctional axonal guidance cue, attracting some axons including commissural axons via the Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) receptor and repelling others via Unc5 receptors (reviewed in ref. ⁶). However, it has not been clear whether netrin-1 plays a role in sensory axonal guidance during development.Several observations strongly suggest a role for netrin-1 in DRG axonal guidance as a repulsive guidance cue during development.^7,8 First, in the mouse embryo at embryonic day (E) 10–11.⁵ when many DRG axons orient themselves to reach the DREZ, netrin-1 is strongly expressed in the floor plate of the ventral spinal cord but not in the dorsal spinal cord (Fig. 1A). Second, at E12.5 when DRG neurons extend their axons longitudinally along the dorsolateral margin of the spinal cord, netrin-1 is expressed in the dorsolateral region adjacent to the DREZ (Fig. 1B), but its expression is down-regulated in the dorsal spinal cord at E13.5 when many collaterals have entered the mantle layer. Third, repulsive netrin-1 receptor Unc5c is expressed in the DRG neurons during development.These observations motivated us to explore whether netrin-1/Unc5c signaling contributes to DRG axonal guidance. We used cell and tissue cultures combined with tissues from netrin-1-deficient mice. We clearly showed that netrin-1 exerts a chemorepulsive activity toward developing DRG axons and that the ventral spinal cord-derived repulsive activity depends on netrin-1 in vitro.⁸ Additional evidence for a chemorepulsive role of netrin-1 came from the observation of DRG axonal trajectories in netrin-1-deficient mice.^7,8 In netrin-1-deficient embryos at E10, we showed that some DRG axons became misoriented toward the ventral spinal cord, probably because of the absence of netrin-1 proteins in the ventral spinal cord (Fig. 1A). In addition, at E12.5 when DRG axons grow to the marginal zone of the spinal cord longitudinally to form the dorsal funiculus, the dorsal funiculus is disorganized in netrin-1-deficient embryos, because in the absence of netrin-1 DRG axons are not waiting for invading the dorsal mantle layer adjacent to the dorsal funiculus (Fig. 1B). Gain-of-function experiments further confirmed the repulsive activity of netrin-1 toward DRG axons (Fig. 1C). These lines of evidence lead us to the conclusion that dorsally derived netrin-1 plays an important role in providing the ‘waiting period’ for extension of collaterals from sensory afferents and that ventrally derived netrin-1 prevents sensory axons from misorienting themselves toward the ventral spinal cord.At later developmental stages (E13.5), DRG axons still possess a weak responsiveness to the chemorepulsive activity of netrin-1 in vitro.⁸ In addition, both postnatal and adult DRG neurons respond to netrin-1-induced axon inhibition.⁹ Consistent with these results, DRG neurons at not only later developmental stages (E13.5) but also postnatal stages express the repulsion-mediating netrin-1 receptor Unc5c.^8,9Generally, lesioning of the dorsal column projection of sensory axons results in a complete lack of regeneration. The possible explanation for the complete lack of regeneration is that the environment, the lesion site itself and/or oligodendrocytes adjacent to the lesion, may be non-permissive for regenerating axons.¹⁰ Sema3A and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) are candidates as major inhibitors of sensory axonal regeneration in the spinal cord, because they are expressed in the lesion site and can inhibit DRG axonal growth in vitro.^3,11–14 Recently, Kaneko et al. showed that a selective inhibitor of Sema3A also enhances axonal regeneration and functional recovery in a subpopulation of sensory neurons after lesioning of the dorsal column.¹² More recently, McMahon''s group clearly demonstrated that enzymatic degradation of CSPGs on the dorsal column lesion of the spinal cord promotes sensory axonal regeneration and functional recovery.^13,14 Although these treatments greatly improved functional recovery, complete sensory axonal growth and functional recovery have not been yet achieved after the spinal cord injury. To promote further recovery of sensory axonal regeneration in the CNS, we should focus on other candidate inhibitors of CNS injury sites.Following spinal cord injury, the expression of the attraction- mediating netrin-1 receptor DCC decreases, while the expression level of the repulsive receptor Unc5c returns to normal.¹⁵ Levels of netrin-1 expression also stay unchanged in neurons and oligodendrocytes adjacent to the lesion site. Together with the in vitro evidence described above, these data strongly suggest a possible role for netrin-1 as a novel inhibitor of CNS myelin for regenerating DRG axons in the dorsal column-lesioned spinal cord. Further studies will be required to show directly the functional recovery of sensory axons in the spinal cord by perturbation of netrin-1 in and around the lesion site after spinal cord injury.     

Genetic Study of Axon Regeneration with Cultured Adult Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons

It is well known that mature neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) cannot regenerate their axons after injuries due to diminished intrinsic ability to support axon growth and a hostile environment in the mature CNS^1,2. In contrast, mature neurons in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) regenerate readily after injuries³. Adult dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons are well known to regenerate robustly after peripheral nerve injuries. Each DRG neuron grows one axon from the cell soma, which branches into two axonal branches: a peripheral branch innervating peripheral targets and a central branch extending into the spinal cord. Injury of the DRG peripheral axons results in substantial axon regeneration, whereas central axons in the spinal cord regenerate poorly after the injury. However, if the peripheral axonal injury occurs prior to the spinal cord injury (a process called the conditioning lesion), regeneration of central axons is greatly improved⁴. Moreover, the central axons of DRG neurons share the same hostile environment as descending corticospinal axons in the spinal cord. Together, it is hypothesized that the molecular mechanisms controlling axon regeneration of adult DRG neurons can be harnessed to enhance CNS axon regeneration. As a result, adult DRG neurons are now widely used as a model system to study regenerative axon growth^5-7.Here we describe a method of adult DRG neuron culture that can be used for genetic study of axon regeneration in vitro. In this model adult DRG neurons are genetically manipulated via electroporation-mediated gene transfection^6,8. By transfecting neurons with DNA plasmid or si/shRNA, this approach enables both gain- and loss-of-function experiments to investigate the role of any gene-of-interest in axon growth from adult DRG neurons. When neurons are transfected with si/shRNA, the targeted endogenous protein is usually depleted after 3-4 days in culture, during which time robust axon growth has already occurred, making the loss-of-function studies less effective. To solve this problem, the method described here includes a re-suspension and re-plating step after transfection, which allows axons to re-grow from neurons in the absence of the targeted protein. Finally, we provide an example of using this in vitro model to study the role of an axon regeneration-associated gene, c-Jun, in mediating axon growth from adult DRG neurons⁹.     

The receptor guanylyl cyclase Npr2 is essential for sensory axon bifurcation within the spinal cord

Sensory axonal projections into the spinal cord display a highly stereotyped pattern of T- or Y-shaped axon bifurcation at the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). Here, we provide evidence that embryonic mice with an inactive receptor guanylyl cyclase Npr2 or deficient for cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase I (cGKI) lack the bifurcation of sensory axons at the DREZ, i.e., the ingrowing axon either turns rostrally or caudally. This bifurcation error is maintained to mature stages. In contrast, interstitial branching of collaterals from primary stem axons remains unaffected, indicating that bifurcation and interstitial branching are processes regulated by a distinct molecular mechanism. At a functional level, the distorted axonal branching at the DREZ is accompanied by reduced synaptic input, as revealed by patch clamp recordings of neurons in the superficial layers of the spinal cord. Hence, our data demonstrate that Npr2 and cGKI are essential constituents of the signaling pathway underlying axonal bifurcation at the DREZ and neuronal connectivity in the dorsal spinal cord.     

Netrin-1 signaling for sensory axons

During development, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend their axons toward the dorsolateral part of the spinal cord and enter the spinal cord through the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). After entering the spinal cord, these axons project into the dorsal mantle layer after a ‘waiting period’ of a few days. We revealed that the diffusible axonal guidance molecule netrin-1 is a chemorepellent for developing DRG axons. When DRG axons orient themselves toward the DREZ, netrin-1 proteins derived from the ventral spinal cord prevent DRG axons from projecting aberrantly toward the ventral spinal cord and help them to project correctly toward the DREZ. In addition to the ventrally derived netrin-1, the dorsal spinal cord cells adjacent to the DREZ transiently express netrin-1 proteins during the waiting period. This dorsally derived netrin-1 contributes to the correct guidance of DRG axons to prevent them from invading the dorsal spinal cord. In general, there is a complete lack of sensory axonal regeneration after a spinal cord injury, because the dorsal column lesion exerts inhibitory activities toward regenerating axons. Netrin-1 is a novel candidate for a major inhibitor of sensory axonal regeneration in the spinal cord; because its expression level stays unchanged in the lesion site following injury, and adult DRG neurons respond to netrin-1-induced axon repulsion. Although further studies are required to show the involvement of netrin-1 in preventing the regeneration of sensory axons in CNS injury, the manipulation of netrin-1-induced repulsion in the CNS lesion site may be a potent approach for the treatment of human spinal injuries.     

Cortical axons branch to multiple subcortical targets by interstitial axon budding: implications for target recognition and "waiting periods"

We are studying how axons branch in vivo. Individual cortical neurons send axons to both the spinal cord and the basilar pons. Here we show that the corticopontine projection develops by an interstitial budding of collaterals from parent axons rather than a reported mechanism of axon branching, growth cone bifurcation. This mechanism is used regardless of whether the parent axon's postpontine segment, which forms the corticospinal projection, is permanent (motor cortex) or transient (visual cortex). Budding occurs days after the parent axons grow spinally past the pons, accounting for the "waiting period" reported in this system in contrast to an alternative explanation that the growth cones pause outside of their target. Timing and location of pontine collateral budding vary with cortical origin of the parent axon and are correlated with the temporal ordering of axon arrival.     

The Adhesive Role of Acetylcholinesterase (AChE): Detection of AChE Binding Proteins in Developing Rat Spinal Cord

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is expressed by dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons during developmental periods when their central axons are growing into and through the spinal cord. Importantly, our previous studies have shown that AChE induces DRG axonal outgrowth by an adhesive mechanism and thus, have now employed a blot overlay technique to screen for potential AChE binding proteins in the developing spinal cord. Our results show that: (1) AChE binds to proteins with apparent molecular weights of 200, 110, 35, and 33k Da; (2) these proteins are developmentally expressed during periods of axonal outgrowth from DRG neurons; (3) all four proteins are synthesized by astrocytes; and (4) AChE binding to these proteins is highly dependent on ionic strength supporting an electrostatic mechanism of adhesion. Taken together, these data provide further documentation for the participation of AChE in adhesive interactions during morphogenesis of the central nervous system and suggest a role for astrocytes in regulating AChE-mediated axonal growth.Special issue dedicated to Lawrence. F. Eng.     

Regeneration of dorsal column fibers into and beyond the lesion site following adult spinal cord injury.

Regeneration is abortive following adult mammalian CNS injury. We have investigated whether increasing the intrinsic growth state of primary sensory neurons by a conditioning peripheral nerve lesion increases regrowth of their central axons. After dorsal column lesions, all fibers stop at the injury site. Animals with a peripheral axotomy concomitant with the central lesion show axonal growth into the lesion but not into the spinal cord above the lesion. A preconditioning lesion 1 or 2 weeks prior to the dorsal column injury results in growth into the spinal cord above the lesion. In vitro, the growth capacity of DRG neurite is also increased following preconditioning lesions. The intrinsic growth state of injured neurons is, therefore, a key determinant for central regeneration.     

Developmental expression of the axonal glycoprotein TAG-1: differential regulation by central and peripheral neurons in vitro.

TAG-1 is a 135,000 Mr axonal glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin superfamily that promotes axon extension in vitro. One distinguishing feature of TAG-1 is its transient expression on subsets of axons in the developing nervous system. To examine the mechanisms that regulate TAG-1, we have monitored the expression of this protein by developing central and peripheral neurons in vitro. TAG-1 was detected on the surface of a subset of E11 to E13 spinal cord neurons in vitro and was also released by these neurons. Expressions of TAG-1 on the cell surface was transient but it was possible to detect a released form of TAG-1 at all times in vitro. Spinal cord neurons isolated from older embryos did not express surface TAG-1 when they regenerated axons in vitro. Changes in the environment of spinal cord neurons did not alter the time course of TAG-1 expression, suggesting that regulation of the protein is cell autonomous. In contrast to these results with spinal cord neurons, surface expression of TAG-1 by DRG neurons persisted in vitro and adult DRG neurons re-expressed TAG-1 when grown in vitro. The cell surface and released forms of TAG-1 therefore appear to be regulated differently by central and peripheral neurons.     

An Ex Vivo Laser-induced Spinal Cord Injury Model to Assess Mechanisms of Axonal Degeneration in Real-time

Injured CNS axons fail to regenerate and often retract away from the injury site. Axons spared from the initial injury may later undergo secondary axonal degeneration. Lack of growth cone formation, regeneration, and loss of additional myelinated axonal projections within the spinal cord greatly limits neurological recovery following injury. To assess how central myelinated axons of the spinal cord respond to injury, we developed an ex vivo living spinal cord model utilizing transgenic mice that express yellow fluorescent protein in axons and a focal and highly reproducible laser-induced spinal cord injury to document the fate of axons and myelin (lipophilic fluorescent dye Nile Red) over time using two-photon excitation time-lapse microscopy. Dynamic processes such as acute axonal injury, axonal retraction, and myelin degeneration are best studied in real-time. However, the non-focal nature of contusion-based injuries and movement artifacts encountered during in vivo spinal cord imaging make differentiating primary and secondary axonal injury responses using high resolution microscopy challenging. The ex vivo spinal cord model described here mimics several aspects of clinically relevant contusion/compression-induced axonal pathologies including axonal swelling, spheroid formation, axonal transection, and peri-axonal swelling providing a useful model to study these dynamic processes in real-time. Major advantages of this model are excellent spatiotemporal resolution that allows differentiation between the primary insult that directly injures axons and secondary injury mechanisms; controlled infusion of reagents directly to the perfusate bathing the cord; precise alterations of the environmental milieu (e.g., calcium, sodium ions, known contributors to axonal injury, but near impossible to manipulate in vivo); and murine models also offer an advantage as they provide an opportunity to visualize and manipulate genetically identified cell populations and subcellular structures. Here, we describe how to isolate and image the living spinal cord from mice to capture dynamics of acute axonal injury.     

Peripheral Nerve Injury Modulates Neurotrophin Signaling in the Peripheral and Central Nervous System

Peripheral nerve injury disrupts the normal functions of sensory and motor neurons by damaging the integrity of axons and Schwann cells. In contrast to the central nervous system, the peripheral nervous system possesses a considerable capacity for regrowth, but regeneration is far from complete and functional recovery rarely returns to pre-injury levels. During development, the peripheral nervous system strongly depends upon trophic stimulation for neuronal differentiation, growth and maturation. The perhaps most important group of trophic substances in this context is the neurotrophins (NGF, BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4/5), which signal in a complex spatial and timely manner via the two structurally unrelated p75^NTR and tropomyosin receptor kinase (TrkA, Trk-B and Trk-C) receptors. Damage to the adult peripheral nerves induces cellular mechanisms resembling those active during development, resulting in a rapid and robust increase in the synthesis of neurotrophins in neurons and Schwann cells, guiding and supporting regeneration. Furthermore, the injury induces neurotrophin-mediated changes in the dorsal root ganglia and in the spinal cord, which affect the modulation of afferent sensory signaling and eventually may contribute to the development of neuropathic pain. The focus of this review is on the expression patterns of neurotrophins and their receptors in neurons and glial cells of the peripheral nervous system and the spinal cord. Furthermore, injury-induced changes of expression patterns and the functional consequences in relation to axonal growth and remyelination as well as to neuropathic pain development will be reviewed.     

De- and regeneration of the bulbospinal serotonin neurons in the rat following 5,6-or 5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine treatment

Summary In an attempt to determine the conditions which permit central 5-HT neurons to respond to a chemical injury of their axons by sprouting and regeneration, the pattern and time-course of recovery of 5-HT concentrations and regrowth of bulbospinal 5-HT axons were evaluated in rats subjected to intraventricular treatment with either 75 g 5,6- or 150 g 5,7-DHT. While 5,6-DHT treatment is followed by a significant recovery of 5-HT concentrations in the telodiencephalon, brainstem and upper part of the spinal cord within 3 months, there is no significant restoration of the severely depleted 5-HT levels in the telodiencephalon and spinal cord, and only limited recovery in 5-HT content of the brainstem preparation after 5,7-DHT.These differences conform to the observation of widespread and effective regrowth and regeneration of the bulbospinal 5-HT neurons in the 5,6-DHT treated lower brainstem and upper spinal cord but restricted and localized sprouting efforts in the 5,7-DHT treated lower medulla oblongata. This could be explained by a cell body near lesion of the non-terminal indoleamine axons by 5,7-DHT which results in a late retrograde, irreversible degeneration of most of the indoleamine pericarya from group B1 and many of group B3.It is concluded that the preservation of a critical length of the main axon and part of its collaterals is necessary for the neuron's survival, and that the individual pattern of the neuropil architecture of brain centres which are invaded by the axonal sprouts may significantly influence their growth characteristics and thus either favour or impede their chance to reestablish connections with their original effector. Aberrant, localized, intense sprouting of drug-damaged axons may in itself reflect the need of the neuron—deprived of most of its axonal tree—to reestablish its original total axonal length by multiple branching.Supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The authors are indebted to Rolf Franck for his technical assistance.Supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (No. 04 X-3874 and 04 X-56).     

The Nogo receptor, its ligands and axonal regeneration in the spinal cord; A review

At least three proteins present in CNS myelin, Nogo, MAG and OMgp are capable of causing growth cone collapse and inhibiting neurite outgrowth in vitro. Surprisingly, Nogo and OMgp are also strongly expressed by many neurons (including neocortical projection cells). Nogo expression is increased by some cells at the borders of CNS lesion sites and by cells in injured peripheral nerves, but Nogo and CNS myelin are largely absent from spinal cord injury sites, which are none the less strongly inhibitory to axonal regeneration. Nogo is found on growing axons during development, suggesting possible functions for neuronal Nogo in axon guidance. Although Nogo, MAG and OMgp lack sequence homologies, they all bind to the Nogo receptor (NgR), a GPI-linked cell surface molecule which, in turn, binds p75 to activate RhoA. NgR is strongly expressed by cerebral cortical neurons but many other neurons express NgR weakly or not at all. Some neurons, such as DRG cells, respond to Nogo and CNS myelin in vitro although they express little or no NgR in vivo which, with other data, indicates that other receptors are available for NgR ligands. NgR expression is unaffected by injury to the nervous system, and there is no clear correlation between NgR expression by neurons and lack of regenerative ability. In the injured spinal cord, interactions between NgR and its ligands are most likely to be important for limiting regeneration of corticospinal and some other descending tracts; other receptors may be more important for ascending tracts. Antibodies to Nogo, mainly the poorly-characterised IN-1 or its derivatives, have been shown to enhance recovery from partial transections of the spinal cord. They induce considerable plasticity from the axons of corticospinal neurons, including sprouting across the midline and, to a limited extent, regeneration around the lesion. Regeneration of corticospinal axons induced by Nogo antibodies has not yet been demonstrated after complete transections or contusion injuries of the spinal cord. It is not clear whether antibodies against Nogo act on oligodendrocytes/myelin or by binding to neuronal Nogo, or whether they can stimulate regeneration of ascending axons in the spinal cord, most of which express little or no NgR. Despite these uncertainties, however, NgR and its ligands offer important new targets for enhancing plasticity and regeneration in the nervous system.     

Coordinate regulation of the expression of axonal proteins by the axonal microenvironment

The axonal functions that act in the formation of the neuronal network have been shown to occur in close interdependence with the tissue that surrounds the growing axons. However, little is known about the molecular building blocks underlying axonal functions, although more than 400 axonal proteins have been identified. In view of the existence of such a large number of axonal proteins, we have initiated a project to determine the molecules involved in the implementation of particular axonal functions by a selective approach. On the assumption that plasticity in the expression of axonal functions in response to specific features of the local axonal environment may be based on changes in the expression of particular axonal proteins, the axonal proteins of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons were screened for those whose expression responds to environmental influences. DRG neurons were grown in a compartmental cell system that offers separate access to neuronal somas and to their axons and the axons were locally exposed to different populations of cells from the peripheral or central nervous system. The axonal proteins were metabolically labeled and subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Computerized quantitation of the individual axonal proteins revealed that the cocultured cells modulate the synthesis of a few axonal proteins of DRG neurons differentially. The data on the abundance of the newly expressed proteins under varying local environmental conditions were condensed as expression profiles. Comparison of expression profiles and cluster analysis of quantitative gel analysis data revealed that the environmentally modulated proteins subdivide into clusters with common distinct expression profiles under the influence of nonneuronal cells from the peripheral nervous system, nonneuronal cells of the central nervous system, and spinal cord cells, which are composed of neurons and nonneuronal cells. By means of this new, characteristic attribute assigned to environmentally modulated axonal proteins, working hypotheses were made as to their functional role.     

P2X receptors in the rat uterine cervix,lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia,and spinal cord during pregnancy

ATP, an intracellular energy source, is released from cells during tissue stress, damage, or inflammation. The P2X subtype of the ATP receptor is expressed in rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, spinal cord dorsal horn, and axons in peripheral tissues. ATP binding to P2X receptors on nociceptors generates signals that can be interpreted as pain from damaged tissue. We have hypothesized that tissue stress or damage in the uterine cervix during late pregnancy and parturition can lead to ATP release and sensory signaling via P2X receptors. Consequently, we have examined sensory pathways from the cervix in nonpregnant and pregnant rats for the presence of purinoceptors. Antiserum against the P2X₃-receptor subtype showed P2X₃- receptor immunoreactivity in axon-like structures of the cervix, in small and medium-sized neurons in the L6/S1 DRG, and in lamina II of the L6/S1 spinal cord segments. Retrograde tracing confirmed the projections of axons of P2X₃-receptor-immunoreactive DRG neurons to the cervix. Some P2X₃-receptor-positive DRG neurons also expressed estrogen receptor- immunoreactivity and expressed the phosphorylated form of cyclic AMP response-element-binding protein at parturition. Western blots showed a trend toward increases of P2X₃-receptor protein between pregnancy (day 10) and parturition (day 22–23) in the cervix, but no significant changes in the DRG or spinal cord. Since serum estrogen rises over pregnancy, estrogen may influence purinoceptors in these DRG neurons. We suggest that receptors responsive to ATP are expressed in uterine cervical afferent nerves that transmit sensory information to the spinal cord at parturition.     

Lamina VII and VIII neurons of the S2 segment bilaterally projecting to the C6 segment of the spinal cord in the cat

Intracellular and extracellular recordings of antidromic action potentials were applied to invetigate neurons of the S2 segment projecting to the C6 segment of the cat spinal cord. The cell bodies were located in laminae VII and VIII of the gray matter while axons ascended in lateral funiculi. Thirty-two out of the total 45 neurons were found to project to the C6 segment bilaterally, seven ipsilaterally and six contralaterally. The axonal conduction velocities were in the 42–96 m/s range and in some neurons were significantly lower in distal parts of axons, supposing that some neurons may give off collateral branches to various segments of the spinal cord. It is discussed if the investigated neurons form a part of the propriospinal system or if their cervical projections are only collaterals of long tracts ascending to supraspinal levels. The organisation of the presented connections between spinal enlargements indicates their contribution in complex mechanisms of co-ordination of movements of the limbs.