埃索美拉唑治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠球部溃疡疗效观察

目的：比较埃索关拉唑与兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Hp）阳性十二指肠球部渍疡疗效观察。方法：将84例Hp阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡随机分为三组。埃索美拉唑组（28例）：埃索美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用埃索美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天;兰索拉唑组（28例）：兰索拉唑15mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用兰索拉唑15mg,每日一次,共21天;奥美拉唑组（28例）：奥美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用奥美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天。疗效结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率,Hp根治率及药物不良反应。结果：埃索美拉唑组、兰索拉唑组和奥关拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为100％,85．7％,82．1％,HP根治率为85．7％,60．7％,64.3％,埃索美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率高于兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率无明显差异（P〉0．05）。三组用药后不良反应少,具较好的安全性。结论：埃索关拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的消化性溃疡疗效优于兰索拉唑及奥美拉唑三联疗法,值得临床广泛应用。     

埃索美拉唑治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠球部溃疡疗效观察

目的:比较埃索美拉唑与兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性十二指肠球部溃疡疗效观察。方法:将84例Hp阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡随机分为三组。埃索美拉唑组(28例):埃索美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1g+呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用埃索美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天;兰索拉唑组(28例):兰索拉唑15mg+阿莫西林1g+呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用兰索拉唑15mg,每日一次,共21天;奥美拉唑组(28例):奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1g+呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用奥美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天。疗效结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率,Hp根治率及药物不良反应。结果:埃索美拉唑组、兰索拉唑组和奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为100%,85.7%,82.1%,HP根治率为85.7%,60.7%,64.3%,埃索美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率高于兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率无明显差异(P>0.05)。三组用药后不良反应少,具较好的安全性。结论:埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的消化性溃疡疗效优于兰索拉唑及奥美拉唑三联疗法,值得临床广泛应用。     

香连片联合三联疗法根除十二指肠溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌感染的临床比较研究

目的:通过与短程三联方法比较,观察香连片联合三联疗法根除十二指肠溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染的根除率和治疗十二指肠溃疡的疗效.方法:120例经胃镜检查确诊为十二指肠溃疡活动期并经快速尿素酶试验和血清杭Hp杭体(ELASE)或病理学检查确定为Hp阳性的患者分为4组:OACX组(奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1000mg+克拉霉素250mg+香连片5片)、OMCX组(奥美拉唑20mg+甲硝唑400mg+克拉霉素250mg+香连片5片),OAC组(奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1OOOmg+克拉霉素250mg)和OMC组(奥美拉唑20mg+甲硝唑400mg+克拉霉素250mg),每日2次,连续7天.然后单独奥美拉唑20mg,每日1次,连续28天,并于用药结束后第28-56天内作13C-尿素呼气试验判断Hp根除率的效果.同时在用药后第1、2、3、7、21和35天对患者的上腹痛、反酸以及上腹烧灼感等症状进行评估.结果:108例患者完成全部治疗方案,12例失访.Hp根除率检查结果显示OACX组的Hp根除率为92.9%(26/28)OMCX组为85.7%(24/28),OAC组为66.7%(18/27)和OMC组为60.0%(15/25).4组间差异有显著性(P<0.01).症状改善情况:4组从用药第1天起均能有效改善患者的上腹痛、反酸、上腹烧灼感等症状,但是,OACX组和OMCX组的总得分下降幅度均显著高于OAC和OMC组(P<0.05-0.01).结论:OACX组和OMCX组对Hp具有相当高的根除率OACX组和OMCX组方案是适合我国国情的根除Hp行之有效的方案,而且,缓解十二指肠溃疡患者的症状,OACX组和OMCX组亦为优.     

联和用药治疗幽门螺杆菌相关性消化性溃疡的疗效比较

观察90例幽门螺杆菌（Hp)感染的消化性溃疡者随机分成A、B、C三组治疗,A组：丽珠胃三联－枸椽铋钾、克拉霉素、替硝唑;B组奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、甲硝唑、C组：奥美拉唑、克拉霉素、替硝唑;疗效均为一周。用药前及停药4周后作内镜。尿毒酶检测及病理学检测后二者Hp均阳性者定为Hp感染,均为阴性定为Hp根除,A、B、C三组Hp根除率分为别为87．5、85．2、87．0;溃疡治疗总有百分率分别为93．8、92．5、96．7。统计学上无显著差异。均有轻微副反应,停药后消失。结果表明丽珠胃三联－周治疗方案具有药物剂量小,疗效程、疗效高、价格低等特点,是较为理想的根除、治疗Hp相关消化性溃疡的药物。     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的：观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法：60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组（30例）和治疗组（30例）,其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑＋瑞巴派特＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果：①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低（P〈0.01）,且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率（43.33%）和总有效率（80.00%）,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率（P〈0.01或0.05）。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性（P〈0.05）。结论：四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗复发性消化性溃疡临床对比研究

目的:比较埃索美拉唑三联与奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性复发性消化性溃疡的临床疗效.方法:将90例经内镜诊断并检测证实Hp阳性的复发性消化性溃疡患者随机分为两组.A组(45例):埃索美拉唑20 mg 羟氨苄青霉素l g 黄连素300 mg,每日2次,共7 d;B组(45例):奥美拉唑20 mg 羟氨苄青霉素1 g 克拉霉素500 mg,每日2次,共7 d.疗程结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及用药后的不良反应等.结果:埃索美拉唑组第1天和第2天腹痛缓解率分别为34.6%和59.6%,高于奥美拉唑组的17.3%和38.5%(P＜0.05 o埃索美拉唑组和奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为92-3%和88.5%,Hp根除率分别为88.5%和82.7%,差异无显著性(P＞0.05).两组用药后不良反应少,有较好的安全性.结论:埃索美拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的复发性消化性溃疡安全有效,腹痛缓解速度优于奥美拉唑三联疗法.     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的:观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法:60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组(30例)和治疗组(30例),其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑+瑞巴派特+阿莫西林+克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果:①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低(P<0.01),且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率(43.33%)和总有效率(80.00%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率(P<0.01或0.05)。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌对Hp感染患者的疗效

为了对比分析2种含铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌胶囊分别对幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)感染患者疗效的影响。本研究随机选取200例就诊的Hp感染患者,将患者随机分为4组,每组50例。A组(埃索美拉唑,克拉霉素,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊)、B组(埃索美拉唑,呋喃唑酮,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊)、C组(埃索美拉唑,克拉霉素,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊,双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊)和D组(埃索美拉唑,呋喃唑酮,阿莫西林,枸橼酸铋钾胶囊和双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊)。分析对比四组患者的临床缓解疗效、幽门螺旋杆菌根除效率、不良反应、复发情况及成本效果比。研究表明:2种含铋剂四联疗法联合双岐三联活菌胶囊对幽门螺杆菌感染患者的临床缓解症状、幽门螺杆菌根除率效果、不良反应发生率和复发情况效果优于含铋剂四联疗法,但是D组成本效果比更具有经济学优势。埃索美拉唑、呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林、枸橼酸铋钾胶囊和双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合可促进Hp患者恢复,根除率高,降低不良反应和复发率,且具有经济学优势,值得推广应用。     

老年幽门螺杆菌相关性消化溃疡的临床特征及治疗方案研究

目的:分析研究老年幽门螺杆菌相关性消化溃疡的临床特征及治疗方案。方法:收集本院收治的240例老年消化性溃疡的患者,检查后按照Hp分组,则Hp阳性组患者206例,Hp阴性组患者36例,比较两组的年龄、溃疡部位、胃泌素和生长抑素水平。之后,将Hp阳性组患者等分为实验组和对照组,每组各103例,实验组给予埃索美拉唑三联疗法,对照组给予奥美拉唑三联疗法,治疗结束后评定临床效果。结果:Hp阳性组年龄和十二指肠溃疡率比Hp阴性组显著高,而胃溃疡率和生长抑素水平显著低(p0.05)。实验组和对照组Hp根除率、溃疡愈合率和不良反应发生率无明显差异(p0.05),但是临床症状消失时间实验组明显短于对照组(p0.05)。结论:老年幽门螺杆菌相关性消化溃疡的患者中,十二指肠溃疡的发病率高与胃溃疡,埃索美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡,临床症状消失快,值得临床推广。     

肝硬化患者幽门螺杆菌感染与血氨的关系

目的 :探讨幽门螺杆菌 (Hp)感染对肝硬化患者血氨浓度的影响。 方法 :35例肝硬化患者及 2 5例消化性溃疡患者分别测定Hp感染情况及空腹血氨浓度 ,对于Hp阳性病人口服质子泵抑制剂三联方案1周后测定空腹血氨。结果 :Hp阳性的肝硬化患者空腹血氨较Hp阴性的肝硬化患者空腹血氨显著升高(P <0 0 1)。根除Hp后 ,肝硬化患者空腹血氨浓度显著下降 (P <0 0 5 )。 结论 :Hp感染可引起肝硬化患者血氨浓度升高 ,对此类患者采用Hp根除治疗 ,可显著降低血氨浓度。抗Hp治疗可能有助于预防及治疗肝硬化患者的高氨血症及由此诱发的肝性脑病及亚临床肝性脑病。     

瑞倍三联1周疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的临床研究

目的 :观察枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁 (RanitidineBismuthCitrate ,RBC瑞倍 )为主的 1周三联疗法的幽门螺杆菌 (Helicobaterpylori,Hp)根除疗效及安全性。方法 :随机将 10 0例Hp阳性患者分为瑞倍治疗组 (A组 )与奥美拉唑三联疗法组 (B组 ) ,疗程 1周 ,14 C 尿素呼气试验及粪抗原检测判断Hp根除效果。结果 :根据意图治疗 (ITT)分析Hp根除率分别为A组 84 0 %及B组 78 0 %。根据试验方案分析 (PP)Hp根除率分别为A组 87 5 %及B组 83 0 %。A组副反应发生率 12 5 % ,B组为 6 4 %。两组变化均无统计学意义 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 ;瑞倍为主短程三联方案的Hp根除疗效与奥美拉唑为主的短程疗效相当 ,副反应发生相似     

布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑阿莫西林克拉霉素治疗顽固性幽门螺杆菌感染的临床研究

目的 探讨布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑阿莫西林克拉霉素三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)顽固性感染的治疗效果.方法 将120例H.pylori顽固性感染患者分成两组,分别采用奥美拉唑的三联疗法和布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗14 d.结果 两组患者治疗14d后,奥美拉唑三联组和布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑三联组的H.pylori清除率分别是94.6％和96.6％,两组间差异无统计学意义;在不良反应方面,奥美拉唑三联治疗组中发生16例,明显高于布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑三联组的5例(P＜0.05).结论 布拉酵母菌联合奥美拉唑三联治疗方案不仅具有良好的H.pylori清除效果,而且不良反应少,是治疗顽固性H.pylori感染患者比较好的方法.     

四联疗法和序贯疗法治疗服用非甾体类消炎药人群幽门螺杆菌感染的临 床对照研究

目的:对比四联疗法和序贯疗法对根除服用非甾体类消炎药(NSAID)人群幽门螺杆菌(Hp),改善其消化道不良症状及促进消化性溃疡愈合的临床效果。方法:对有消化不良症状的服用非甾体类消炎药物患者行胃镜检查、快速尿激酶及13C呼气试验检查,将155例幽门螺杆菌阳性合并有慢性胃炎或消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组,A组采用四联疗法,B组采用序贯疗法。A组予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林+枸橼酸铋钾治疗10天;B组前5天予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林,后5天予雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+甲硝唑。治疗结束后,予雷贝拉唑和胃黏膜保护剂治疗8周。停药4周后,复查胃镜、13C呼气试验,观察和比较两组Hp根除率、消化不良症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率。结果:A、B两组Hp根除率分别为(ITT分析:86.7%和81.9%;PP分析:87.8%和84.3%);症状缓解率为(81.9%对79.2%);胃溃疡愈合率为(68.8%对66.7%),十二指肠球部溃疡的愈合率为(68.2%对70.0%),两组患者间Hp根除率、症状缓解率及溃疡愈合率比较均未见明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。四联疗法组和序贯疗法组不良反应的发生率分别为4.9%和4.3%。两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:四联疗法和序贯疗法对长期服用非甾体类消炎药物人群的Hp根除疗效、消化不良症状的缓解及促进溃疡愈合的治疗作用均无明显差异。     

三联疗法与胃复春联合治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效评估

目的:探讨三联疗法与胃复春联合治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性胃溃疡的临床疗效。方法:选择2011年11月到2014年11月在我院就诊的240例Hp阳性胃溃疡患者,随机分为实验组(n=120)和对照组(n=120)。对照组采用三联疗法,实验组在对照组基础上加服胃复春。比较两组患者的临床疗效、Hp根除率、胃泌素、胃动素水平。结果:实验组患者的总有效率和Hp根除率均明显高于对照组,具有显著性差异(均P0.05)。实验组治疗后胃泌素水平低于治疗前,亦低于对照组治疗后,具有显著性差异(均P0.05),胃动素变化无显著性差异。结论:三联疗法联合胃复春治疗Hp阳性胃溃疡能有效根除Hp,降低胃泌素水平,治疗效果良好。     

Indications for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic overview.

OBJECTIVE: To determine (a) the advantages and disadvantages of treatment options for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and (b) whether eradication of H. pylori is indicated in patients with duodenal ulcer, nonucler dyspepsia and gastric cancer. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search for articles published in English between January 1983 and December 1992 with the use of MeSH terms Helicobacter pylori (called Campylobacter pylori before 1990) and duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer, dyspepsia and clinical trial. Six journals and Current Contents were searched manually for pertinent articles published in that time frame. STUDY SELECTION: For duodenal ulcer the search was limited to studies involving adults, studies of H. pylori eradication and randomized clinical trials comparing anti-H. pylori therapy with conventional ulcer treatment. For nonulcer dyspepsia with H. pylori infection the search was limited to placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. DATA EXTRACTION: The quality of each study was rated independently on a four-point scale by each author. For the studies of duodenal ulcer the outcome measures assessed were acute ulcer healing and time required for healing, H. pylori eradication and ulcer relapse. For the studies of nonulcer dyspepsia with H. pylori infection the authors assessed H. pylori eradication, the symptoms used as outcome measures and whether validated outcome measures had been used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight trials involving duodenal ulcer met our inclusion criteria: five were considered high quality, two were of reasonable quality, and one was weak. Six trials involving nonulcer dyspepsia met the criteria, but all were rated as weak. Among treatment options triple therapy with a bismuth compound, metronidazole and either amoxicillin or tetracycline achieved the highest eradication rates (73% to 94%). Results concerning treatment indications for duodenal ulcer were consistent among all of the studies: when anti-H. pylori therapy was added to conventional ulcer treatment acute ulcers healed more rapidly. Ulcer relapse rates were dramatically reduced after H. pylori eradication. All of the studies involving nonulcer dyspepsia assessed clearance rather than eradication of H. pylori. No study used validated outcome measures. A consistent decrease in symptom severity was no more prevalent in patients in whom the organism had been cleared than in those taking a placebo. Of the studies concerning gastric cancer none investigated the effect of eradication of H. pylori on subsequent risk of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There is sufficient evidence to support the use of anti-H. pylori therapy in patients with duodenal ulcers who have H. pylori infection, triple therapy achieving the best results. There is no current evidence to support such therapy for nonulcer dyspepsia in patients with H. pylori infection. Much more attention must be paid to the design of nonulcer dyspepsia studies. Also, studies are needed to determine whether H. pylori eradication in patients with gastritis will prevent gastric cancer.     

One year follow-up of patients after successful helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) status of patients who underwent successful eradication therapy 1 year prior to the study and to evaluate their current symptoms. METHODS: all of the patients were initially evaluated by oesophago-gastro-bulboscopy and the Hp status was determined by at least two different methods [rapid urease test, histology or urea breath test (UBT)]. The Hp infection was treated with a 1-week triple therapy protocol, and the UBT was repeated 4-6 weeks later. We invited back 110 patients who had negative post-eradication UBT results 12+/-3 months prior to the study period. UBT was repeated and a questionnaire was completed about the previous and present complaints and medication. RESULTS: 80 of the 110 patients (73%) came back for the follow-up. Twenty five patients had peptic ulcer disease, 36 patients had gastritis or duodenitis without erosive lesions, and 19 patients had erosive form of gastritis or duodenitis initially. All of the patients except one in the erosive gastritis group had negative control UBT 1 year after the eradication, which means 1.25% recurrence rate within 1 year. The eradication therapy completely revealed the symptoms of 16 patients in the ulcer group (64%), 13 patients in the gastroduodenitis group (36%, P=0.03 vs. ulcer patients), 10 patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (52%), but this was only temporary. One year after the eradication therapy seven of the ulcer patients (28%), 11 patients with gastroduodenitis (31%) and seven patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (37%) were symptom-free. Most of the patients had epigastric pain (44%), heartburn (43%) and/or abdominal distension (33%). Nine ulcer patients (36%), 10 patients with gastroduodenitis (28%) and five patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (26%) were taking H(2)-blockers regularly. CONCLUSION: the 1-month post-eradication UBT was probable true negative in all of the evaluated cases, since 79 patients (98.75%) were also negative after 1 year. The Hp recurrence rate is very low (1.25%) in a 1-year period. The symptoms were relieved shortly after eradication therapy in the majority of patients with ulcer disease or erosive lesions. However, significantly smaller portion of the patients with gastroduodenitis became symptom-free. Only about one third of the treated patients remained symptom-free 1 year after the eradication.     

Rank order of success favors longer duration of imidazole-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a randomized pilot study

Background. Studies on eradication therapy in developing countries have shown a success rate of 70–85%, which is suboptimal. Duration of therapy may be an important factor dictating eradication success in such regions. Aim. The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of increasing the treatment period on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease. Methods. A randomized trial was carried out in which 64 consecutive H. pylori‐infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. The patients were randomized to one of the three trial arms. Therapy consisted of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. The treatment period was 1 week in group I, 2 weeks in group II and 3 weeks in group III. At inclusion, patients underwent endoscopy and the presence of H. pylori was documented by a positive urease test and C14 urea breath test. Four weeks after completion of eradication therapy, the patients were subjected to repeat endoscopy to assess ulcer healing and tests for H. pylori infection. Results. Sixty‐four patients (55 male and nine female; mean age 35.5 years) were enrolled in each group. The H. pylori eradication rate for group I (1 week of therapy) was 47.6%, that for group II (2 weeks of therapy) was 80%, and that for group III (3 weeks of therapy) was 91.3% (p = .003). The ulcer healing rates were 71.4, 80 and 95.6% in groups I, II and III, respectively (p = .09). Conclusion. The 3‐week regimen significantly improved the eradication rate as compared with the 1‐week regime. Increasing the duration of therapy significantly improved the chances of eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.     

One year follow-up of patients after successful helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) status of patients who underwent successful eradication therapy 1 year prior to the study and to evaluate their current symptoms. Methods: all of the patients were initially evaluated by oesophago-gastro-bulboscopy and the Hp status was determined by at least two different methods [rapid urease test, histology or urea breath test (UBT)]. The Hp infection was treated with a 1-week triple therapy protocol, and the UBT was repeated 4–6 weeks later. We invited back 110 patients who had negative post-eradication UBT results 12±3 months prior to the study period. UBT was repeated and a questionnaire was completed about the previous and present complaints and medication. Results: 80 of the 110 patients (73%) came back for the follow-up. Twenty five patients had peptic ulcer disease, 36 patients had gastritis or duodenitis without erosive lesions, and 19 patients had erosive form of gastritis or duodenitis initially. All of the patients except one in the erosive gastritis group had negative control UBT 1 year after the eradication, which means 1.25% recurrence rate within 1 year. The eradication therapy completely revealed the symptoms of 16 patients in the ulcer group (64%), 13 patients in the gastroduodenitis group (36%, P=0.03 vs. ulcer patients), 10 patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (52%), but this was only temporary. One year after the eradication therapy seven of the ulcer patients (28%), 11 patients with gastroduodenitis (31%) and seven patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (37%) were symptom-free. Most of the patients had epigastric pain (44%), heartburn (43%) and/or abdominal distension (33%). Nine ulcer patients (36%), 10 patients with gastroduodenitis (28%) and five patients with erosive gastroduodenitis (26%) were taking H₂-blockers regularly. Conclusion: the 1-month post-eradication UBT was probable true negative in all of the evaluated cases, since 79 patients (98.75%) were also negative after 1 year. The Hp recurrence rate is very low (1.25%) in a 1-year period. The symptoms were relieved shortly after eradication therapy in the majority of patients with ulcer disease or erosive lesions. However, significantly smaller portion of the patients with gastroduodenitis became symptom-free. Only about one third of the treated patients remained symptom-free 1 year after the eradication.     

嗜酸乳杆菌(乐托尔)治疗幽门螺杆菌感染疗效

目的 :观察嗜酸乳杆菌 (乐托尔 )对人胃内幽门螺杆菌的治疗作用。方法 :经证实 Hp感染阳性的胃、十二指肠溃疡病人 ,分别给予嗜酸乳杆菌治疗组与胃三联的对照组 ,给药后观察临床症状恢复情况 ,溃疡愈合情况 ,胃粘膜 Hp感染情况 ;结果 :(1)总的临床症状改善率治疗组总有效率为 89.8% (35 / 37) ,对照组为 92 .9% (34/ 36 ) ,两组比较差异无显著性。 (2 )溃疡愈合率 :两组病人愈合治疗组与对照组分别是85 .9% (5 5 / 6 4 )和 92 .1% (71/ 77) ,两组χ2 检验比较差异无显著性 (P<0 .0 5 )。 (3) Hp转阴率 :两组在 4周末分别是治疗组 6 7.3% (33/ 4 9)和 84 .5 % (49/ 5 8) ,两组比较差异无显著性 (P>0 .0 5 )。结论 :嗜酸乳杆菌在抑制 Hp感染作用与抗菌素相仿 ,值得临床上应用 ,是临床上抗 Hp感染治疗极的前途的药物之一。