Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin in an in-vitro poly(ADP-ribose)-turnover system.

This paper describes the effect of an in-vitro poly(ADP-ribose) turnover system on the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin. Both poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase were highly purified and used in 4 different turnover systems: non-turnover, slow, medium and fast turnover. These turnover systems were designed to reflect possible turnover conditions in intact cells. The major protein acceptors for poly(ADP-ribose) are histones and the polymerase itself, a process referred to as automodification. The level of poly(ADP-ribose) modification of polymerase, histone H1 and core histones has been measured. The size of the polymer for each of the 3 groups of acceptor proteins has been determined by gel electrophoresis. After many turnover cycles at medium and fast turnover, the histones (H1 and core) become the main poly(ADP-ribose) acceptor proteins. The rate at which steady-state polymer levels are reached and the total accumulation of polymer in a given turnover system are both inversely proportional to the amount of glycohydrolase present. Furthermore, increasing amounts of glycohydrolase in the turnover systems reduces average polymer size. The polymer synthesized in the medium and fast turnover systems is degraded by glycohydrolase in a biphasic fashion and in these systems the half-life of polymer agreed with results found in intact cells. Our results show that the relative levels of polymerase and glycohydrolase activities can regulate the proportional poly(ADP-ribose) distribution on chromatin-associated acceptor proteins during steady-state turnover conditions. The patterns of modification of polymerase and histones under turnover conditions agree with in vivo observations.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) accessibility to poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activity on poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated nucleosomal proteins

Hydrolysis of protein-bound 32P-labelled poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase shows that there is differential accessibility of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated proteins in chromatin to poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. The rapid hydrolysis of hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated forms of histone H1 indicates the absence of an H1 dimer complex of histone molecules. When the pattern of hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated histones was analyzed it was found that poly(ADP-ribose) attached to histone H2B is more resistant than the polymer attached to histone H1 or H2A or protein A24. Polymer hydrolysis of the acceptors, which had been labelled at high substrate concentrations (greater than or equal to 10 microM), indicate that the only high molecular weight acceptor protein is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and that little processing of the enzyme occurs. Finally, electron microscopic evidence shows that hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which is dissociated from its DNA-enzyme complex, binds again to DNA after poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase action.     

Effect of DNA on poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and the degradation of histone H1-poly (ADP-ribose) complex from HeLa cell nuclei.

A poly(ADP-ribose)-H1 histone complex has been isolated from HeLa cell nuclei incubated with NAD. The rate of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase catalyzed hydrolysis of the polymer in the complex is only 1/9 that of free poly(ADP-ribose), indicating that the polymer is in a protected environment within the complex. Comparison of the rate of hydrolysis of free poly(ADP-ribose) in the presence or absence of H1 to that in the complex synthesized de novo indicates a specific mode of packaging of the complex. This is further indicated by the fact that alkaline dissociation of the complex followed by neutralization markedly exposes the associated poly(ADP-ribose) to the glycohydrolase. The complex also partially unfolds when it binds to DNA as evidenced by a 2-fold increase in the rate of glycolytic cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose). This effect of DNA is not due to a stimulation of the glycohydrolase per se since hydrolysis of free polymer by the enzyme is strongly inhibited by DNA, especially single-stranded DNA. Inhibition of glycohydrolase by DNA results from the binding of the enzyme to DNA and conditions which decrease this binding (increased ionic strength or addition of histone H1 which competes for DNA binding) relieve the DNA inhibition.     

Modulation of chromatin structure by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a nuclear enzyme that is highly conserved in eucaryotes. Its activity is totally dependent on the presence of DNA containing single or double stranded breaks. We have shown that this activation results in a decondensation of chromatin superstructure in vitro, which is caused mainly by hyper(ADP-ribosy)ation of histone H1. In core particles, the modification of histone H2B leads to a partial dissociation of DNA from core histones. The conformational change of native chromatin by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is reversible upon degradation of the histone H1-bound poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. We propose that cuts produced in vivo on DNA during DNA repair activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which then synthesizes poly(ADP-ribose) on histone H1, in particular, and contributes to the opening of the 25-nm chromatin fiber, resulting in the increased accessibility of DNA to excision repair enzymes. This mechanism is fast and reversible.     

A shuttle mechanism for DNA-protein interactions. The regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

Previously it had been shown that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase requires DNA for its activity and that this enzyme is auto-poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated. The studies reported here indicate that this self-modification inhibits the enzyme and decreases its affinity for DNA, as shown by sucrose gradient density centrifugation. The coupling of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase with poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase reactivates the polymerase by degrading poly(ADP-ribose) and restoring the polymerase-DNA complex. The assay of polymerase in the presence of glyco-hydrolase was made possible by use of a double-label assay involving release of 14C-labelled nicotinamide and the incorporation of 3H-labelled ADP-ribose from NAD+. These results provide the basis for a shuttle mechanism in which the polymerase can be moved on and off DNA by the action of these two enzymes. Mg2+ and histone H1 appear to activate the polymerase by increasing the affinity of the polymerase for DNA.     

Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Histone-specific adaptations of reaction products

The post-translational poly ADP-ribosylation of proteins by the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) involves a complex pattern of ADP-ribose polymers. We have determined how this enzyme produces the various polymer size patterns responsible for altered protein function. The results show that histone H1 and core histones are potent regulators of both the numbers and sizes of ADP-ribose polymers. Each histone induced the polymerase to synthesize a specific polymer size pattern. Various other basic and/or DNA binding proteins as well as other known stimulators of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (spermine, MgCl2, nicked DNA) were ineffective as polymer size modulators. Testing specific proteolytic fragments of histone H1, the polymer number and polymer size modulating activity could be mapped to specific polypeptide domains. The results suggest that histones specifically regulate the polymer termination reaction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.     

Properties of the complex between histone H1 and poly(ADP-ribose synthesised in HeLa cell nuclei

Preparations of H1 histone from HeLa cell nuclei incubated with [3H]NAD to permit poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis were electrophoresed on polyacrylamide gels. The incorporated radioactivity migrated as a sharply defined peak in association with a protein band which moved more slowly than H1, the major protein component. The following observations indicate that this complex is composed of two molecules of H1 and a single chain of poly(ADP-ribose) with one detectable covalent linkage of polymer to protein. 1. The [14C]arginine/[3H]lysine ratio is identical in H1 histone and in the protein moiety of the complex. 2. Protein is displaced from H1 histone to the complex during poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis. At least 90% of the protein in the complex (stainable protein and labelled protein) is derived from H1. 3. Sedimentation rate studies indicate a molecular weight of the complex about twice that of H1 histone. 4. The average chain length of the polymer is 15 ADP-ribose units and there are 7--8 ADP-ribose units for each molecule of H1 histone in the 'complex'. 5. Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase, which hydrolyses the polymer exoglycosidically from the AMP terminus, degrades the complex producing ADP-ribose and mono-ADP-ribosylated H1 histone which co-electrophoreses with unmodified H1. Although only one covalent linkage between protein and polymer has been detected, the 'complex' does not dissociate when electrophoresed on dodecylsulfate gels. Nor can the noncovalently linked H1 histone of the complex readily exchange with free H1. Complex formation does not occur when purified poly(ADP-ribose) and H1 are mixed.     

Histone shuttling by poly ADP-ribosylation

The enzymes poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase may cooperate to drive a histone shuttle mechanism in chromatin. The mechanism is triggered by binding of the N-terminal zinc-finger domain of the polymerase to DNA strand breaks, which activates the catalytic activities residing in the C-terminal domain. The polymerase converts into a protein carrying multiple ADP-ribose polymers which displace histones from DNA by specifically targeting the histone tails responsible for DNA condensation. As a result, the domains surrounding DNA strand breaks become accessible to other proteins. Poly(ADP0ribose) glycohydrolase attacks ADP-ribose polymers in a specific order and thereby releases histones for reassociation with DNA. Increasing evidence from different model systems suggests that histone shuttling participates in DNA repairin vivo as a catalyst for nucleosomal unfolding.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) degradation by glycohydrolase starts with an endonucleolytic incision

We have recently shown that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase forms poly(ADP-ribose) by adding ADP-ribose residues to the polymerase-proximal end of an enzyme-bound nascent chain. In this light we have reexamined the mode of hydrolysis of enzyme-bound poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. When the substrate has been labeled by a pulse-chase protocol, soluble glycohydrolase releases a significant amount of labeled oligomer which can only come from the enzyme-distal (2') end of the polymer. This constitutes additional evidence for the proximal growth of chains. Oligomer is infrequently released from the proximal (1") end of enzyme-bound chains. Rather, the bulk of the poly(ADP-ribose) is digested directly to ADP-ribose monomers. We conclude that poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase starts digestion with an endonucleolytic incision and then removes ADP-ribose residues processively in the 2'----1" direction. Therefore, in contrast to earlier models of polymer growth and hydrolysis, a single poly(ADP-ribose) chain may be extended at one end and simultaneously degraded at the other end. The balance between synthesis and degradation may control the quantity and distribution of polymer around the DNA break which occasions its synthesis.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) turnover in quail myoblast cells: Relation between the polymer level and its catabolism by glycohydrolase

The concerted action of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) which synthesizes the poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr) in response to DNA strand breaks and the catabolic enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) determine the level of polymer and the rate of its turnover. In the present study, we have shown that the quail myoblast cells have high levels of basal polymer as compared to the murine C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts. We have conducted this study to investigate how such differences influence polymer synthesis and its catabolism in the cells in response to DNA damage by alkylating agent. In quail myoblast cells, the presence of high MNNG concentration such as 200 \sgmaelig;M for 30 min induced a marginal decrease of 15% in the NAD content. For C3H10T1/2 cell line, 64 \sgmaelig;M MNNG provoked a depletion of NAD content by approximately 50%. The induction of the polymer synthesis in response to MNNG treatment was 6-fold higher in C3H10T1/2 cells than in quail myoblast cells notwithstanding the fact that 3-fold higher MNNG concentration was used for quail cells. The polymer synthesis thus induced in quail myoblast cells had a 4-5 fold longer half life than those induced in C3H10T1/2 cells. To account for the slow turnover of the polymer in the quail myoblast cells, we compared the activities of the polymer catabolizing enzyme (PARG) in the two cell types. The quail myoblast cells had about 25% less activity of PARG than the murine cells. This difference in activity is not sufficient to explain the large difference of the rate of catabolism between the two cell types implicating other cellular mechanisms in the regulation of pADPr turnover.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) catabolism in mammalian cells

Poly(ADP-ribose) catabolism is a complex situation involving many proteins and DNA. We have developed anin vitro turnover system where poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism is monitored in presence of different relative amounts of two principal enzymes poly(ADP-ribose) transferase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase along with other proteins and DNA. Our current results reviewed here show that the quality of polymer, i.e. chain length and complexity, as well as preference for the nuclear substrate varies depending upon the availability of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. These results are interpreted in the light of the recent data implicating poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism in DNA-repair. (Mol Cell Biochem 138: 45–52 1994)     

NAD turnover during early development of Xenopus laevis

The NAD pools of Xenopus laevis oocytes and early embryos can be radioactively labelled by microinjection of [adenine- ³H]NAD. This technique is used to study the metabolism of NAD in oocytes and during early development. The rate at which NAD is degraded in vivo has been monitored by determining the rate of transfer of adenine residues from the NAD pool into other nucleotides and polynucleotides. In oocytes, NAD turnover is extremely slow, with a half-life of about 400 h. NAD turnover increases dramatically after fertilisation, and the half-life of the compound decreases to 37 h in 5-h-old embryos and to 10 h in 40-h-old embryos. 2 mM 3-aminobenzamide, a specific inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, reduces the NAD turnover rate by about 20%, whereas 5 mM isonicotinic acid hydrazide, a specific inhibitor of NAD glycohydrolase, produces no significant inhibition. This indicates that a significant fraction of the considerable NAD turnover observed involves poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Our results indicate that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is active during early development and suggest that this activity may be involved in one or more aspects of the nuclear metabolism of the embryo.     

Modulation of chromatin superstructure induced by poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis and degradation

It has been demonstrated recently by Poirier et al. (Poirier, G. G., de Murcia, G., Jongstra-Bilen, J., Niedergang, C., and Mandel, P. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3423-3427) that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of pancreatic nucleosomes causes relaxation of the chromatin superstructure through H1 modification. The in vitro effect of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis and degradation on calf thymus chromatin was investigated by the time course incorporation of ADP-ribose, electron microscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation, and autoradiography of the protein acceptors. Purified calf thymus poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and partially purified bull testis poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were used. Degradation of ADP-ribose units on hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated H1 by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase restores the native condensed chromatin superstructure. This reversible conformational change induced by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on nucleosomal arrangement could be one of the mechanisms by which the accessibility of DNA polymerases and/or excision-repair enzymes is favored, the native structure being fully restorable.     

Histone shuttling by poly(ADP-ribosylation).

We have found that two nuclear enzymes, i.e. poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase, may cooperate to function as a histone shuttle mechanism on DNA. The mechanism involves four distinct reaction intermediates that were analyzed in a reconstituted in vitro system. In the first step, the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is activated in the presence of histone-DNA complexes and converts itself into a protein carrying multiple ADP-ribose polymers. These polymers attract histones that dissociate from the DNA as a histone-polymer-polymerase complex. The DNA assumes the electrophoretic mobility of free DNA and becomes susceptible to nuclease digestion (second step). In the third step, poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase degrades ADP-ribose polymers and thereby eliminates the binding sites for histones. In the fourth step, histones reassociate with DNA, and the histone-DNA complexes exhibit the electrophoretic mobilities and nuclease susceptibilities of the original complexes prior to dissociation. Our results are compatible with the view that the poly(ADP-ribosylation) system acts as a catalyst of nucleosomal unfolding of chromatin in DNA excision repair.     

Evidence of poly(ADP-ribosylation) in the cockroach Periplaneta americana

Poly(ADP-ribosylation) is a post-translational modification of nuclear proteins typical of most eukaryotic cells. This process participates in DNA replication and repair and is mainly regulated by two enzymes, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which is responsible for the synthesis of polymers of ADP-ribose, and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase, which performs polymer degradation. The aim of this work was to investigate in the cockroach Periplaneta americana L. (Blattaria: Blattidae) the behaviour of poly(ADP-ribosylation). In particular, we addressed: (i) the possible modulation of poly(ADP-ribosylation) during the embryonic development; (ii) the expression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and glycohydrolase in different tissues; and (iii) the role of poly(ADP-ribosylation) during spermatogenesis. In this work we demonstrated that: (i) as revealed by specific biochemical assays, active poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and glycohydrolase are present exclusively in P. americana embryos at early stages of development; (ii) an activity carrying out poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis was found in extracts from testes; and (iii) the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) occurs preferentially in differentiating spermatids/spermatozoa. Collectively, our results indicate that the poly(ADP-ribosylation) process in P. americana, which is a hemimetabolous insect, displays catalytical and structural features similar to those described in the holometabolous insects and in mammalian cells. Furthermore, this process appears to be modulated during embryonic development and spermatogenesis.     

Purification and characterization of an (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase from human erythrocytes

An (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase from human erythrocytes was purified approximately 13,000-fold and characterized. On sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel the purified enzyme appeared homogeneous and had an estimated relative molecular mass (Mr) of 59,000. Amino acid analysis showed that the enzyme had a relatively high content of acidic amino acid residues and low content of basic amino acid residues. Isoelectrofocusing showed that the enzyme was an acidic protein with pI value of 5.9. The mode of hydrolysis of (ADP-ribose)n by this enzyme was exoglycosidic, yielding ADP-ribose as the final product. The Km value for (ADP-ribose)n (average chain length, n = 15) was 5.8 microM and the maximal velocity of its hydrolysis was 21 mumol.min-1.mg protein-1. The optimum pH for enzyme activity was 7.4 KCl was more inhibitory than NaCl. The enzyme activity was inhibited by ADP-ribose and cAMP but not the dibutyryl-derivative (Bt2-cAMP), cGMP or AMP. These physical and catalytic properties are similar to those of cytosolic (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase II, but not to those of nuclear (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase I purified from guinea pig liver [Tanuma, S., Kawashima, K. & Endo, H. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 965-969]. Thus, human erythrocytes contain (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase II. The kinetics of degradation of poly(ADP-ribose) bound to histone H1 by purified erythrocyte (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase was essentially the same as that of the corresponding free poly(ADP-ribose). In contrast, the glycohydrolase showed appreciable activity of free oligo(ADP-ribose), much less activity on the corresponding oligo(ADP-ribose) bound to histone H1. The enzyme had more activity on oligo(ADP-ribose) bound to mitochondrial and cytosolic free mRNA ribonucleoprotein particle (mRNP) proteins than on oligo(ADP-ribose) bound to histone H1. It did not degrade mono(ADP-ribosyl)-stimulatory guanine-nucleotide-binding protein (Gs) and -inhibitory guanine-nucleotide-binding protein (Gi) prepared with cholera and pertussis toxins, respectively. These results suggest that cytosolic (ADP-ribose)n glycohydrolase II may be involved in extranuclear de(ADP-ribosyl)n-ation, but not in membrane de-mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation.     

Cytoplasmic poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase in AEV-transformed chicken erythroblasts

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activities were both investigated in chicken erythroblasts transformed by Avian Erythroblastosis Virus. Respectively 21% and 58% of these activities were found to be present in the post-mitochondrial supernatant (PMS). Fractionation of the PMS on sucrose gradients and poly(A⁺) mRNA detection by hybridization to [³H] poly(U) show that cytoplasmic poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is exclusively localized in free mRNP. The glycohydrolase activity sedimented mostly in the 6 S region but 1/3 of the activity was in the free mRNP zone. Seven poly(ADP-ribose) protein acceptors were identified in the PMS in the Mr 21000–120000 range. The Mr 120000 protein corresponds to automodified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. A Mr 21000 protein acceptor is abundant in PMS and a Mr 34000 is exclusively associated with ribosomes and ribosomal subunits. The existence of both poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and glycohydrolase activities in free mRNP argues in favour of a role of poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mRNP metabolism. A possible involvement of this post translational modification in the mechanisms of repression-derepression of mRNA is discussed.Abbreviations ADP-ribose adenosine (5) diphospho(5)--D ribose - poly(ADP-ribose) polymer of ADP-ribose - mRNP messenger ribonucleoprotein particles - PMSF phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride - LDS lithium dodecyl sulfate - TCA trichloroacetic acid     

Purification and characterization of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. Different modes of action on large and small poly(ADP-ribose)

Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase was purified approximately 74,000-fold to apparent homogeneity from calf thymus with a yield of 3.2%. The enzyme was a monomeric protein of Mr = 59,000, as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The action of glycohydrolase on poly(ADP-ribose) was exoglycosidic in the direction of adenosine terminus----ribose terminus; radioactive ADP-ribose monomers were immediately produced from evenly labeled poly(ADP-ribose), but not from the polymer labeled selectively at the ribose terminus. The enzymatic degradation of large poly(ADP-ribose) (greater than 20 ADP-ribose residues) proceeded in a biphasic as well as bimodal manner. In the early and rapid phase, the enzyme degraded part of large polymers successively, leaving the remainder completely intact, and accumulated ADP-ribose monomers and small polymers of the size less than half of original polymers, indicating that the enzyme action was processive up to a certain extent. In the late and 20-fold slower phase, by contrast, the enzyme degraded the accumulated small polymers gradually and evenly, i.e. in a nonprocessive manner. The Km for large polymers was approximately 100-fold lower than that for small polymers. Similar rates and processivities were observed with large and small polymers bound to various proteins. These results suggested that the glycohydrolase may regulate differentially the levels of large and small poly(ADP-ribose) in the cell.