The pattern of pairing that is effective for crossing over in complex B-A chromosome rearrangements in maize

The study of the mechanism of meiotic homolog pairing, approached by comparing chiasma frequencies in rearranged segments that differ in relative length and intrachromosomal location, is substantially extended here. For the first time, two kinds of evidence were found that centers specialized for alignment pairing may exist in maize chromosomes: (1) for two segments, higher than average crossover frequency per unit length was maintained when these were located in several different chromosomal positions with respect to centromere and telomere, and in fact apart from their own normal centromeres and telomeres. High crossover frequencies in these segments regardless of position are considered to reflect innate capacity for alignment pairing due to relatively strong pairing center content. (2) For a short rearranged segment, chiasma frequency was drastically reduced, and evidence suggests that all of the chiasmata found there depended upon juxtaposition made possible by the completion of the zip-up pairing process in the other arms of the translocation configuration. This short segment is thought to be essentially devoid of pairing center content. It seems possible that crossover frequency depression in short rearranged segments may usually not be due, as commonly supposed, to mechanical difficulties inherent in formation of contorted configurations, but rather to absence of pairing centers within them and the relative rarity (compared to the normal sequence situation) of enabling zip-up pairing. Evidence also indicates that pairing which leads to crossing over must frequently occur between internal translocated segments and their normal sequence counterparts in a way which cannot be dependent upon zipping-up of two-by-two pairing initiated at or near telomeres. Pairing centers in maize are probably numerous and widely dispersed, since coarse direct proportionality is found when chiasma frequency is compared for an array of segment lengths.     

Synaptic initiation and extension as prerequisites for crossing over

The effect on crossover frequency in maize of three hour heat treatment was studied when treatment was applied at zygotene (substantially later than the major DNA synthetic period) and at pachytene. Crossover frequency assay was based upon bridge and fragment frequency at anaphase I in heterozygotes for a short paracentric inversion. Effect of treatment was studied in three distinguishable synaptic classes: (1) overall crossover frequency within the inversion, (2) double crossover frequency where two separate events of pairing initiation are required (coincident crossovers within and proximal to the inversion) and (3) double crossover frequency within the inversion, where spreading of synapsis over a short distance from a single event of pairing initiation can provide the requisite pairing. Evidence is reported: (1) that overall crossover frequency within the inversion was very significantly increased by treatment at zygotene but not detectably affected by treatment at pachytene; (2) that double crossover frequency within the inversion was very significantly increased by treatment at pachytene and may have been somewhat increased by treatment at zygotene. Results are consistent with the model that most crossover sites may be established at, or approximately at, events of synaptic initiation but that establishment of infrequent second crossover sites near those formed first can follow or accompany the spreading of synapsis to adjoining regions.     

Meiotic recombination in Drosophila females depends on chromosome continuity between genetically defined boundaries

In the pairing-site model, specialized regions on each chromosome function to establish meiotic homolog pairing. Analysis of these sites could provide insights into the mechanism used by Drosophila females to form a synaptonemal complex (SC) in the absence of meiotic recombination. These specialized sites were first established on the X chromosome by noting that there were barriers to crossover suppression caused by translocation heterozygotes. These sites were genetically mapped and proposed to be pairing sites. By comparing the cytological breakpoints of third chromosome translocations to their patterns of crossover suppression, we have mapped two sites on chromosome 3R. We have performed experiments to determine if these sites have a role in meiotic homolog pairing and the initiation of recombination. Translocation heterozygotes exhibit reduced gene conversion within the crossover-suppressed region, consistent with an effect on the initiation of meiotic recombination. To determine if homolog pairing is disrupted in translocation heterozygotes, we used fluorescent in situ hybridization to measure the extent of homolog pairing. In wild-type oocytes, homologs are paired along their entire lengths prior to accumulation of the SC protein C(3)G. Surprisingly, translocation heterozygotes exhibited homolog pairing similar to wild type within the crossover-suppressed regions. This result contrasted with our observations of c(3)G mutant females, which were found to be defective in pairing. We propose that each Drosophila chromosome is divided into several domains by specialized sites. These sites are not required for homolog pairing. Instead, the initiation of meiotic recombination requires continuity of the meiotic chromosome structure within each of these domains.     

Intrachromosomal recombination between well-separated, homologous sequences in mammalian cells.

In the present study, we investigated intrachromosomal homologous recombination in a murine hybridoma in which the recipient for recombination, the haploid, endogenous chromosomal immunoglobulin mu-gene bearing a mutation in the constant (Cmu) region, was separated from the integrated single copy wild-type donor Cmu region by approximately 1 Mb along the hybridoma chromosome. Homologous recombination between the donor and recipient Cmu region occurred with high frequency, correcting the mutant chromosomal mu-gene in the hybridoma. This enabled recombinant hybridomas to synthesize normal IgM and to be detected as plaque-forming cells (PFC). Characterization of the recombinants revealed that they could be placed into three distinct classes. The generation of the class I recombinants was consistent with a simple unequal sister chromatid exchange (USCE) between the donor and recipient Cmu region, as they contained the three Cmu-bearing fragments expected from this recombination, the original donor Cmu region along with both products of the single reciprocal crossover. However, a simple mechanism of homologous recombination was not sufficient in explaining the more complex Cmu region structures characterizing the class II and class III recombinants. To explain these recombinants, a model is proposed in which unequal pairing between the donor and recipient Cmu regions located on sister chromatids resulted in two crossover events. One crossover resulted in the deletion of sequences from one chromatid forming a DNA circle, which then integrated into the sister chromatid by a second reciprocal crossover.     

Two Types of Sites Required for Meiotic Chromosome Pairing in Caenorhabditis Elegans

Previous studies have shown that isolated portions of Caenorhabditis elegans chromosomes are not equally capable of meiotic exchange. These results led to the proposal that a homolog recognition region (HRR), defined as the region containing those sequences enabling homologous chromosomes to pair and recombine, is localized near one end of each chromosome. Using translocations and duplications we have localized the chromosome I HRR to the right end. Whereas the other half of chromosome I did not confer any ability for homologs to pair and recombine, deficiencies in this region dominantly suppressed recombination to the middle of the chromosome. These deletions may have disrupted pairing mechanisms that are secondary to and require an HRR. Thus, the processes of pairing and recombination appear to utilize at least two chromosomal elements, the HRR and other pairing sites. For example, terminal sequences from other chromosomes increase the ability of free duplications to recombine with their normal homologs, suggesting that telomere-associated sequences, homologous or nonhomologous, play a role in facilitating meiotic exchange. Recombination can also initiate at internal sites separated from the HRR by chromosome rearrangement, such as deletions of the unc-54 region of chromosome I. When crossing over was suppressed in a region of chromosome I, compensatory increases were observed in other regions. Thus, the presence of the HRR enabled recombination to occur but did not determine the distribution of the crossover events. It seems most likely that there are multiple initiation sites for recombination once homolog recognition has been achieved.     

A Quality Control Mechanism Coordinates Meiotic Prophase Events to Promote Crossover Assurance

Meiotic chromosome segregation relies on homologous chromosomes being linked by at least one crossover, the obligate crossover. Homolog pairing, synapsis and meiosis specific DNA repair mechanisms are required for crossovers but how they are coordinated to promote the obligate crossover is not well understood. PCH-2 is a highly conserved meiotic AAA+-ATPase that has been assigned a variety of functions; whether these functions reflect its conserved role has been difficult to determine. We show that PCH-2 restrains pairing, synapsis and recombination in C. elegans. Loss of pch-2 results in the acceleration of synapsis and homolog-dependent meiotic DNA repair, producing a subtle increase in meiotic defects, and suppresses pairing, synapsis and recombination defects in some mutant backgrounds. Some defects in pch-2 mutants can be suppressed by incubation at lower temperature and these defects increase in frequency in wildtype worms grown at higher temperature, suggesting that PCH-2 introduces a kinetic barrier to the formation of intermediates that support pairing, synapsis or crossover recombination. We hypothesize that this kinetic barrier contributes to quality control during meiotic prophase. Consistent with this possibility, defects in pch-2 mutants become more severe when another quality control mechanism, germline apoptosis, is abrogated or meiotic DNA repair is mildly disrupted. PCH-2 is expressed in germline nuclei immediately preceding the onset of stable homolog pairing and synapsis. Once chromosomes are synapsed, PCH-2 localizes to the SC and is removed in late pachytene, prior to SC disassembly, correlating with when homolog-dependent DNA repair mechanisms predominate in the germline. Indeed, loss of pch-2 results in premature loss of homolog access. Altogether, our data indicate that PCH-2 coordinates pairing, synapsis and recombination to promote crossover assurance. Specifically, we propose that the conserved function of PCH-2 is to destabilize pairing and/or recombination intermediates to slow their progression and ensure their fidelity during meiotic prophase.     

Pairing of ZW gonosomes and the localized recombination nodule in two Z-autosome translocations in Gallus domesticus

Electron microscopic observations of synaptonemal complexes of oocytes from chickens heterozygous for two Z-autosome translocations have been used to identify and study the pairing region of the Z and W chromosomes. The two translocations, MN t(Z;1) and t(OH 10), have breakpoints in opposite arms of the Z, and the arm having the breakpoint of MN t(Z;1) is marked by the terminal C+ band. In both translocations the short arm of the W was specifically paired with the euchromatic short arm of the Z. In MN t(Z;1) only open quadrivalents (74%) and trivalents plus W univalents (26%) were observed, whereas t(OH 10) exhibited, in addition to the prevalent quadrivalents (62%), III + I (19%) and II + II (19%) configurations. The extent of W pairing was slightly decreased in MN t(Z;1) (68.4% of the W chromosomes paired) and considerably decreased in t(OH 10) (25.3% of the W chromosomes paired). Nonhomologous synapsis occurred regularly at the quadrivalent crosspoint in MN t(Z;1) and also in bivalents from t(OH 10). The recombination nodule normally located in the terminus of the pairing region in normal ZW pairs is present in both translocations without any alteration of its frequency or its strict terminal position. Based on these data and previous observations (Rahn and Solari, 1986), it is proposed that an obligatory recombination event occurs at a locus between 0.7 microns and 0.15 microns of the paired ZW telomeres, establishing a recombinational region and a pseudoautosomal region which determine partial sex-linkage and no sex-linkage, respectively. Most of the pairing region of the ZW pair is nonhomologously paired.     

The Effects of Translocations on Recombination Frequency in Caenorhabditis Elegans

In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, recombination suppression in translocation heterozygotes is severe and extensive. We have examined the meiotic properties of two translocations involving chromosome I, szT1(I;X) and hT1(I;V). No recombination was observed in either of these translocation heterozygotes along the left (let-362-unc-13) 17 map units of chromosome I. Using half-translocations as free duplications, we mapped the breakpoints of szT1 and hT1. The boundaries of crossover suppression coincided with the physical breakpoints. We propose that DNA sequences at the right end of chromosome I facilitate pairing and recombination. We use the data from translocations of other chromosomes to map the location of pairing sites on four other chromosomes. hT1 and szT1 differed markedly in their effect on recombination adjacent to the crossover suppressed region. hT1 had no effect on recombination in the adjacent interval. In contrast, the 0.8 map unit interval immediately adjacent to the szT1(I;X) breakpoint on chromosome I increased to 2.5 map units in translocation heterozygotes. This increase occurs in a chromosomal interval which can be expanded by treatment with radiation. These results are consistent with the suggestion that the szT1(I) breakpoint is in a region of DNA in which meiotic recombination is suppressed relative to the genomic average. We propose that DNA sequences disrupted by the szT1 translocation are responsible for determining the frequency of meiotic recombination in the vicinity of the breakpoint.     

Primary products of break-induced recombination by Escherichia coli RecE pathway.

Alternative models for break-induced recombination predict different distributions of primary products. The double-stranded break-repair model predicts a noncrossover product and equimolar amounts of two crossover products. The one-end pairing model predicts two crossover products, but not necessarily in equimolar amounts, and the single-stranded annealing model predicts deletion of the fragment between the pairing sequences. Depending on the structure of the recombining substrate(s) and the nature of the resectioning step that precedes strand annealing, the single-stranded annealing mechanism would yield only one or both crossover products. We tested these predictions for the RecE recombination pathway of Escherichia coli. Nonreplicating intramolecular recombination substrates with a double-stranded break (DSB) within one copy of a direct repeat were released from chimera lambda phage by in vivo restriction, and the distribution of primary circular recombination products was determined. Noncrossover products were barely detectable, and the molar ratio of the two crossover products was proportional to the length ratio of the homologous ends flanking the DSB. These results suggest an independent pairing of each end with the intact homolog and argue against the double-stranded break-repair model. However, the results do not distinguish alternative pairing mechanisms (strand invasion and strand annealing). The kinetics of heteroduplex formation and heteroduplex strand polarity were investigated. Immediately following the DSB induction, heteroduplex formation was done by pairing the strands ending 3' at the break. A slow accumulation of the complementary heteroduplex made by the pairing of the strands ending 5' at the break (5' heteroduplexes) was observed at a larger stage. The observed bias in heteroduplex strand polarity depended on DSB induction at a specific site. The 5' heteroduplexes may have been generated by reciprocal strand exchange, pairing that is not strand specific, or strand-specific pairing induced at random breaks.     

The cleavage specificity of RNase III.

We determined sites in lambda cII mRNA that are cleaved by RNase III in the presence of lambda OOP antisense RNA, using a series of OOP RNAs with different internal deletions. In OOP RNA-cII mRNA structures containing a potential region of continuous double-stranded RNA bounded by a non-complementary unpaired region, RNase III cleaved the cII mRNA at one or more preferred sites located 10 to 14 bases from the 3'-end of the region of continuous complementarity. Cleavage patterns were almost identical when the presumptive structure was the same continuously double-stranded region followed by a single-stranded bulge and a second short region of base pairing. The sequences of the new cleavage sites show generally good agreement with a consensus sequence derived from thirty-five previously determined cleavage sequences. In contrast, four 'non-sites' at which cleavage is never observed show poor agreement with this consensus sequence. We conclude that RNase III specificity is determined both by the distance from the end of continuous pairing and by nucleotide sequence features within the region of pairing.     

Illegitimate pairing of the X and Y chromosomes in Sxr mice

X/Y male mice carrying the sex reversal factor, Sxr, on their Y chromosomes typically produce 4 classes of progeny (recombinant X/X Sxr male male and X/Y non-Sxr male male, and non-recombinant X/X female female and X/Y Sxr male male) in equal frequencies, these deriving from obligatory crossing over between the chromatids of the X and Y during meiosis. Here we show that X/Y males that, exceptionally, carry Sxr on their X chromosome, rather than their Y, produce fewer recombinants than expected. Cytological studies confirmed that X-Y univalence is frequent (58%) at diakinesis as in X/Y Sxr males, but among those cells with X-Y bivalents only 38% showed normal X-Y pseudo-autosomal pairing. The majority of such cells (62%) instead showed an illegitimate pairing between the short arms of the Y and the Sxr region located at the distal end of the X, and this can be understood in terms of the known homology between the testis-determining region of the Y short arm and that of the Sxr region. This pairing was sufficiently tenacious to suggest that crossing over took place between the 2 regions, and misalignment and unequal exchange were suggested by indications of bivalent asymmetry. Metaphase II cells deriving from meiosis I divisions in which the normal X-Y exchange had not occurred were also found. The cytological data are therefore consistent with the breeding results and suggest that normal pseudo-autosomal pairing and crossing over is not a prerequisite for functional germ cell formation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A model for somatic pairing derived from somatic crossing over with third chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary X-ray induced crossing-over between the left arms of third chromosome pairs heterozygous for rearrangements was used to measure the somatic pairing of these arms. mwh spots were scored in the wing blades. A significantly reduced number of crossover spots is found in flies heterozygous for inversions or translocations located in the 3L arm. This decrease from control frequencies was experimentally demonstrated to be due to inviability of some crossover spots which are aneuploid as a result of crossing-over within the inverted sequence or between the translocation piece and its centromere. By the same token, some euploid crossover spots are produced by crossing-over outside of the inverted region or between the translocation breakpoint and the mwh locus. Thus, these results are evidence that the euchromatic non-centric portions of the 3L arms are somatically paired in the presence of rearrangements.A model of somatic pairing in which chromosomes are normally found in a hair pin configuration is proposed to account for these results and for some previous results with X-chromosomes which indicated that inversion heterozygotes did not pair somatically.Supported in part by USPHS grant GM 16096 to J.R.M.     

The pattern of pairing that is effective for crossing over in complex B-A chromosome rearrangements in maize II

The problem of meiotic homologue pairing is approached by comparing chiasma frequencies in rearranged chromosome segments that differ substantially in relative length and intrachromosomal location. Results are consistent with affirmative answers to some questions previously raised: (1) whether there may be an underlying direct relationship between frequency of pairing and length of segment, (2) whether pairing commonly can be initiated independently in intercalary regions, and (3) whether there also can be a role for extension of pairing in adjoining regions for the establishment of pairing in intercalary regions, which requires pairing partner change. In addition, results here suggest that there may be: (1) greater capacity for establishment of pairing of more distal compared to proximal regions in a way that may also be dependent on their lengths, at least when these are relatively short, and additionally in a way which cannot be attributed to special properties of telomeres, (2) nearly random distribution of pairing of any two genetically long intercalary region representatives where three are present, without regard to the matching of the remainder of the chromosomes involved, and (3) a strong tendency for change of pairing partner in long distal segments when these are present in triplicate. Although sharp heterogeneities of pairing capacity were not found, it is suggested that they may exist with spacing too close for easy detection with the resolving power available.     

Drosophila ribosomal RNA genes function as an X-Y pairing site during male meiosis

In Drosophila melanogaster males, the sex chromosomes pair during meiosis in the centric X heterochromatin and at the base of the short arm of the Y (YS), in the vicinity of the nucleolus organizers. X chromosomes deficient for the pairing region segregate randomly from the Y. In this report we show that a single ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene stimulates X-Y pairing and disjunction when inserted onto a heterochromatically deficient X chromosome by P element-mediated transformation. We also show that insert-containing X chromosomes pair at the site of insertion, that autosomal rDNA inserts do not affect X-Y pairing or disjunction, and that the strength of an X pairing site is proportional to the dose of ectopic rRNA genes. These results demonstrate that rRNA genes can promote X-Y pairing and disjunction and imply that the nucleolus organizers function as X-Y pairing sites in wild-type Drosophila males.     

Specific recognition and differential affinity of meiotic X-Y pairing sites in Lucilia cuprina males (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Meiotic pairing of X and Y chromosomes in male Lucilia cuprina was studied by cytological observation of normal, rearranged and deficient sex chromosome karyotypes in spermatogenesis. Two X-Y pairing regions located distally in each arm of the X and Y chromosomes were defined. Contrasting with findings in Drosophila melanogaster, these pairing regions show specific recognition of their partners. By studying rearranged sex chromosomes short arm pairing was localised to their distal ends, closely associated with secondary constrictions containing nucleolar organisers in both sex chromosomes. Short arm pairing is very tight and not greatly disrupted by chromosome rearrangement, deficiency for the Y chromosome long arm or the presence of supernumerary X chromosomes. The pairing region of the long arms could not be precisely localised but probably also occurs at their distal ends. Pairing between the long arm sites is much weaker and is easily disrupted by chromosome rearrangement, failing completely in flies deficient for the Y chromosome short arm. No cytologically visible pairing was seen between X chromosomes and the remainder of the Y. In males with an extra X chromosome, the ends of both X chromosomes pair to form multivalents with normal and rearranged Y chromosomes provided the Y short arm is present, otherwise an independent X chromosome bivalent is formed. The mechanism of pairing in male Lucilia sex chromosomes thus seems to depend on specific loci of distinctive structure within the X and Y heterochromatin. Comparison of cytological and genetic data shows that increasing cytological pairing failure is matched by higher genetic X-Y nondisjunction but that the former occurs at much higher levels. In some karyotypes cytologically observed X-Y pairing failure is not matched by high frequencies of nondisjunction presumably because weak pairing associations are disrupted during slide preparation.     

Timing of molecular events in meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: stable heteroduplex DNA is formed late in meiotic prophase.

To better understand the means by which chromosomes pair and recombine during meiosis, we have determined the time of appearance of heteroduplex DNA relative to the times of appearance of double-strand DNA breaks and of mature recombined molecules. Site-specific double-strand breaks appeared early in meiosis and were formed and repaired with a timing consistent with a role for breaks as initiators of recombination. Heteroduplex-containing molecules appeared about 1 h after double-strand breaks and were followed shortly by crossover products and the first meiotic nuclear division. We conclude that parental chromosomes are stably joined in heteroduplex-containing structures late in meiotic prophase and that these structures are rapidly resolved to yield mature crossover products. If the chromosome pairing and synapsis observed earlier in meiotic prophase is mediated by formation of biparental DNA structures, these structures most likely either contain regions of non-Watson-Crick base pairs or contain regions of heteroduplex DNA that either are very short or dissociate during DNA purification. Two loci were examined in this study: the normal ARG4 locus, and an artificial locus consisting of an arg4-containing plasmid inserted at MAT. Remarkably, sequences in the ARG4 promoter that suffered double-strand cleavage at the normal ARG4 locus were not cut at significant levels when present at MAT::arg4. These results indicate that the formation of double-strand breaks during meiosis does not simply involve the specific recognition and cleavage of a short nucleotide sequence.     

An asymmetric chromosome pair undergoes synaptic adjustment and crossover redistribution during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis: implications for sex chromosome evolution

Heteromorphic sex chromosomes, such as the X/Y pair in mammals, differ in size and DNA sequence yet function as homologs during meiosis; this bivalent asymmetry presents special challenges for meiotic completion. In Caenorhabditis elegans males carrying mnT12, an X;IV fusion chromosome, mnT12 and IV form an asymmetric bivalent: chromosome IV sequences are capable of pairing and synapsis, while the contiguous X portion of mnT12 lacks a homologous pairing partner. Here, we investigate the meiotic behavior of this asymmetric neo-X/Y chromosome pair in C. elegans. Through immunolocalization of the axis component HIM-3, we demonstrate that the unpaired X axis has a distinct, coiled morphology while synapsed axes are linear and extended. By showing that loci at the fusion-proximal end of IV become unpaired while remaining synapsed as pachytene progresses, we directly demonstrate the occurrence of synaptic adjustment in this organism. We further demonstrate that meiotic crossover distribution is markedly altered in males with the asymmetric mnT12/+ bivalent relative to controls, resulting in greatly reduced crossover formation near the X;IV fusion point and elevated crossovers at the distal end of the bivalent. In effect, the distal end of the bivalent acts as a neo-pseudoautosomal region in these males. We discuss implications of these findings for mechanisms that ensure crossover formation during meiosis. Furthermore, we propose that redistribution of crossovers triggered by bivalent asymmetry may be an important driving force in sex chromosome evolution.     

The effect of heterochromatin on synapsis of the sex chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)

The pairing behavior of the sex chromosomes in male and female individuals representing seven species of Peromyscus was analyzed by electron microscopy of silver-stained zygotene and pachytene configurations. Six species possess submetacentric or metacentric X chromosomes with heterochromatic short arms. Sex-chromosome pairing in these species is initiated during early pachynema at an interstitial position on the X and Y axes. Homologous synapsis then progresses in a unidirectional fashion towards the telomeres of the X short arm and the corresponding arm of the heterochromatic Y chromosome. The distinctive pattern of synaptic initiation allowed a late-synapsing bivalent in fetal oocytes to be tentatively identified as that of the X chromosomes. In contrast to the other species, Peromyscus megalops possesses an acrocentric X chromosome and a very small Y chromosome. Sex-chromosome pairing in this species is initiated at the proximal telomeric region during late zygonema, and then proceeds interstitially towards the distal end of the Y chromosome. These observations suggest that the presence of X short-arm heterochromatin and corresponding Y heterochromatin interferes with late-zygotene alignment of the pairing initiation sites, thereby delaying XY synaptic initiation until early pachynema. The pairing initiation sites are conserved in the vicinity of the X and Y centromeres in Peromyscus, and consequently the addition of heterochromatin during sex-chromosome evolution essentially displaces these sites to an interstitial position.     

The behavior and morphology of the X and Y chromosomes during prophase I in the Sitka deer mouse (Peromyscus sitkensis)

Surface-spread, silver-stained primary spermatocytes from individuals of the Sitka deer mouse (Peromyscus sitkensis) were analyzed by electron microscopy. Pairing of the X and Y chromosomes is initiated at early pachynema and is complete by mid pachynema. The pattern of sex chromosome pairing is unique in that it is initiated at an interstitial position, with subsequent synapsis proceeding in a unidirectional fashion towards the telomeres of the homologous segments. One-third the length of the X and two-thirds the length of the Y are involved in the synaptonemal complex of the sex bivalent. Various morphological complexities develop in the heteropycnotic (unpaired) segments as pachynema progresses, but desynapsis is not initiated until diplonema. Analysis of C-banded diakinetic nuclei indicated that sex chromosome pairing involves the heterochromatic short arm of the X and the long arm of the heterochromatic Y. An interstitial chiasma between the X and Y was observed in the majority of the diakinetic nuclei. The observation of a substantial pairing region and chiasma formation between the sex chromosomes of these deer mice is interpreted as indicating homology between the short arm of the X and the long arm of the Y.