Effect of the transmembrane electric field on the photochemical and quenching properties of photosystem II in vivo.

The intermediate phase of fluorescence relaxation (lms-ls) (Joliot, P., Joliot, A., Bouges, B, and Barbieri, G. (1971) Photochem. Photobiol. 14, 287-305), following a single saturating flash, is shown to be controlled by a slow phase of the reoxidation of Q- by a secondary acceptor and, in vivo, by the transmembrane electric field. The kinetics of reoxidation of Q- are slowed by lowering the pH. This slowing effect is interpreted in terms of the reversible formation at low pH of QH which is not oxidizable by the secondary acceptor. The electric field transforms Photosystem II centers into a non-quenching photochemically inactive state that cannot be attributed to an accumulation of Q-. Centers are unequally sensitive to the field. A critical field strength can be defined for each center above which that center is blocked and below which the center is photochemically active. The transformation from the active to inactive state occurs over a narrow range of field strength. Sensitive centers are blocked by the field in less than 1 ms and become active again in less than 10 ms as the field strength falls. Two hypotheses are proposed for the mechanism of blockage of centers by the field: (1) a field induced conformational change in the centers, (2) the formation or suppression of a dipole critical to the function of a center. The activity of the ATP synthetase, determining the rate of relaxation of the field, was controlled by a light-dark treatment or by a chemical method using p-benzoquinone.     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II. II. Redox titration at various pH values of the flash-induced formation of C550 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary quinone electron acceptor

Redox titrations of the flash-induced formation of C550 (a linear indicator of Q^?) were performed between pH 5.9 and 8.3 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary electron acceptor, B. One-third of the reaction centers show a pH-dependent midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) = ? 30 mV) for redox couple $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$, which varies by ?60 mV/pH unit. Two-thirds of the centers show a pH-independent midpoint potential (E_mm = + 10 mV) for this couple. The elevated pH-independent E_m suggests that in the latter centers the environment of Q has been modified such as to stabilize the semiquinone anion, Q^?. The midpoint potentials of the centers having a pH-dependent E_m are within 20 mV of those observed in chloroplasts having a secondary electron acceptor. It appears therefore that the secondary electron acceptor exerts little influence on the E_m of $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. An EPR signal at g 1.82 has recently been attributed to a semiquinone-iron complex which comprises Q^?. The similar redox behavior reported here for C550 and reported by others (Evans, M.C.W., Nugent, J.H.A., Tilling, L.A. and Atkinson, Y.E. (1982) FEBS Lett. 145, 176–178) for the g 1.82 signal in similar Photosystem II particles confirm the assignment of this EPR signal to Q^?. At below ?200 mV, illumination of the Photosystem II particles produces an accumulation of reduced pheophytin (Ph^?). At ?420 mV Ph^? appears with a quantum yield of 0.006–0.01 which in this material implies a lifetime of 30–100 ns for the radical pair P-680⁺Ph^?.     

Picosecond kinetics in reaction centers of Rps. sphaeroides and the effects of ubiquinone extraction and reconstitution.

Following picosecond light activation, the bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin complement of $\text{Rps.}\text{sphaeroides}$ reaction centers depleted of ubiquinone behaves as though it has no primary electron acceptor; the excited intermediary $\text{BChl}\text{BPh}{}^2$ state formed in <10 ps lasts >1 ns. Addition of ubiquinone-10 reconstitutes the very rapid electron transfer rates from the excited intermediary $\text{BCh}\text{BPh}$ state to ubiquinone; the kinetics and rate are similar to that encountered in the untreated reaction centers. Interpretation of the data presented suggests that ubiquinone is the immediate electron acceptor from BPh^?. This is consistent with the model for the primary reactions leading to [(BChl)₂^?BPh]Q^?.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

The existence of a high photochemical turnover rate at the reaction centers of System II in Tris-washed chloroplasts

In Tris-washed chloroplasts the kinetics of the primary electron acceptor X 320 of reaction center II has been investigated by fast repetitive flash spectroscopy with a time resolution of $\text{≈ 1 μs}$. It has been found that X 320 is reduced by a flash in $\text{? 1 μs}$. The subsequent reoxidation in the dark occurs mainly by a reaction with a 100–200 μs kinetics. The light-induced difference spectrum confirms X 320 to be the reactive species. From these results it is concluded that in Tris-washed chloroplasts the reaction centers of System II are characterized by a high photochemical turnover rate mediated either via rapid direct charge recombination or via fast cyclic electron flow.     

Interaction of exogenous benzoquinone with Photosystem II in chloroplasts. The semiquinone form acts as a dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive secondary acceptor

Chloroplasts were submitted to a sequence of saturating short flashes and then rapidly mixed with dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU). The amount of singly reduced secondary acceptor (B^?) present was estimated from the DCMU-induced increase in fluorescence in the dark caused by the reaction: QB^?

Q^?B. By varying the time interval between the preillumination and the mixing, the time course of B^? reoxidation by externally added benzoquinone was investigated. It was found that benzoquinone oxidizes B^? in a bimolecular reaction, and does not interact directly with Q^?. When a sufficient delay after the preillumination was allowed in order to let benzoquinone reoxidize B^? before the injection of DCMU, the fluorescence increase caused by one subsequent flash fired in the presence of DCMU was followed by a fast decay phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 100 μ}\text{s}$). The amplitude of this phase was proportional to the amount of B^? produced by the preillumination. This fast decay was observed only after the first flash in the presence of DCMU. These results are interpreted by assuming a binding of the singly reduced benzoquinone to Photosystem II where it acts as an efficient, DCMU-insensitive, secondary (exogenous) acceptor.     

Properties of inactive Photosystem II centers

A fraction (usually in the range of 10–25%) of PS II centers is unable to transfer electrons from the primary quinone acceptor Q_A to the secondary acceptor Q_B. These centers are inactive with respect to O₂ evolution since their reopening after photochemical charge separation to the S₂O_A ^- state involves predominantly a back reaction to S₁Q_A in the few seconds time range (slower phases are also occurring). Several properties of these centers are analyzed by fluorescence and absorption change experiments. The initial rise phase F_o-F_pl of fluorescence induction under weak illumination reflects both the closure of inactive centers and the modulation of the fluorescence yield by the S-states of the oxygen-evolving system: We estimate typical relative amplitudes of these contributions as, respectively, 65 and 35% of the F_o-F_pl amplitude. The half-rise time of this phase is significantly shorter than for the fluorescence induction in the presence of DCMU (in which all centers are involved). This finding is shown to be consistent with inactive centers sharing the same light-harvesting antenna as normal centers, a view which is also supported by comparing the dependence of the fluorescence yield on the amount of closed active or inactive centers estimated through absorption changes. It is argued that the exponential kinetics of the F_o-F_pl phase does not indicate absence of excitation energy transfer between the antennas of inactive and active centers. We show that the acceptor dichlorobenzoquinone does not restore electron transfer in inactive centers, in disagreement with previous suggestions. We confirm, however, the enhancement of steady-state electron flow caused by this quinone and suggest that it acts by relieving a blocking step involved in the reoxidation of a fraction of the plastoquinone pool. Part of the discrepancies between the present results and those from previous literature may arise from the confusion of inactive centers characterized on a single turnover basis and PS II centers that become blocked under steady-state conditions because of deficient reoxidation of their secondary acceptors.Abbreviations DCBQ 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - DMQ 2,5-dimethyl-p-benzoquinone - PS photosystem     

Turnover kinetics of Photosystem I measured by the electrochromic effect in Chlorella

The rise kinetics of the absorption changes induced at 515 nm and 480 nm by a flash were studied using two types of xenon flashes of different durations. The ‘slow’ rise of the absorption change ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 15–20 μ}\text{s}$) observed by Cox and Delosme (1978 C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D 282, 775–778) and Joliot P., Delosme, R. and Joliot, A. ((1977) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 459, 47–57) was found to be due to double hits occurring in the reaction centers of System I during the flash.The turnover kinetics of the reaction centers of System I after a short flash were studied by a double flash method. They are in agreement with a second order reaction between P⁺-700 and its electron donor.     

Light-dependent modification of Photosystem II in spinach leaves

In dark-adapted spinach leaves approximately one third of the Photosystem II (PS II) reaction centers are impaired in their ability to transfer electrons to Photosystem I. Although these inactive PS II centers are capable of reducing the primary quinone acceptor, Q_A, oxidation of Q_A ^– occurs approximately 1000 times more slowly than at active centers. Previous studies based on dark-adapted leaves show that minimal energy transfer occurs from inactive centers to active centers, indicating that the quantum yield of photosynthesis could be significantly impaired by the presence of inactive centers. The objective of the work described here was to determine the performance of inactive PS II centers in light-adapted leaves. Measurements of PS II activity within leaves did not indicate any increase in the concentration of active PS II centers during light treatments between 10 s and 5 min, showing that inactive centers are not converted to active centers during light treatment. Light-induced modification of inactive PS II centers did occur, however, such that 75% of these centers were unable to sustain stable charge separation. In addition, the maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence associated with inactive PS II centers decreased substantially, despite the lack of any overall quenching of the maximum fluorescence yield. The effect of light treatment on inactive centers was reversed in the dark within 10–20 mins. These results indicate that illumination changes inactive PS II centers into a form that quenches fluorescence, but does not allow stable charge separation across the photosynthetic membrane. One possibility is that inactive centers are converted into centers that quench fluorescence by formation of a radical, such as reduced pheophytin or oxidized P680. Alternatively, it is possible that inactive PS II centers are modified such that absorbed excitation energy is dissipated thermally, through electron cycling at the reaction center.Abbreviations A518 absorbance change at 518 nm, reflecting the formation of an electric field across the thylakoid membrane - A_FL1 amplitude of the fast (<100 ms) phase of A518 induced by the first of two saturating, single-turnover flashes spaced 30 ms apart - A_FL2 amplitude of the fast (<100 ms) phase of A518 induced by the second of two saturating, single-turnover flashes spaced 50 ms apart - DCBQ 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone - Fo yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully oxidized - Fm yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully reduced - Fx yield of chlorophyll fluorescence when Q_A is fully reduced at inactive PS II centers, but fully oxidized at active PS II centers - Pheo pheophytin - P680 the primary donor of Photosystem II - PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density - Q_A Primary quinone acceptor of PS II - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor of PS II     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II I. Redox titration of the flash-induced carotenoid band shift,of C550 and of the variable fluorescence yield in spinach chloroplasts

Redox titration of the electrochromic carotenoid band shift, detected at 50 μs after a saturating actinic flash, in spinach chloroplasts, shows that only one electron acceptor in Photosystem II participates in a transmembrane primary electron transfer. This species, the primary quinone acceptor, Q, shows only one midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) of approx. 0 V and is undoubtedly equivalent to the fluorescence quencher, Q_H. A second titration wave is observed at low potential ($\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext><mtext>,7.5</mtext>}}\text{? ? 240}\text{mV}$) and at greater than 3 ms after a saturating actinic flash. This wave has an action spectrum different from that of Photosystem II centers containing Q and could arise from a secondary but not primary electron transfer. A low-potential fluorescence quencher is observed in chloroplasts which largely disappears in a single saturating flash at ? 185 mV and which does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This low-potential quencher (probably equivalent to fluorescence quencher, Q_L) and Q are altogether different species. Redox titration of C550 shows that if electron acceptor Q_β is indeed characterized by an E_m,7 of + 120 mV, then this acceptor does not give rise to a C550 signal upon reduction and does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This titration also shows that C550 is not associated with Q_L.     

Heterogeneity of system II secondary electron acceptors in Tris-washed chloroplasts

Tris-washed chloroplasts were submitted to saturating short flashes, and then rapidly mixed with dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU). The amount of singly reduced secondary acceptor was estimated from the DCMU-induced increase in fluorescence, caused by the reverse electron flow from secondary to primary acceptor. The back-transfer from the singly reduced secondary acceptor to the primary acceptor Q induced by DCMU addition affects only a part (60%) of the variable fluorescence (ΔF_max). As previously shown, the quenchers involved in this phenomenon, ‘B-type’ quenchers, are different from those controlling the complementary part of the fluorescence, the non-B-type. In this report, we show that at pH 8.5 in the B-type systems, there exist two kinds of secondary electron acceptors: B, a two-electron acceptor, the corresponding Q accounting for 40% of the variable fluorescence; B′, a one-electron acceptor, the corresponding Q accounting for 20% of the variable fluorescence. The lifetimes of B^? and B′^? in the absence of DCMU are 40 and 1 s, respectively. The primary acceptors of the B and B′ systems can be considered as corresponding to the Q₁s defined previously (Joliot, P. and Joliot, A. (1981) in Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Photosynthesis (Akoynoglou, G., ed.), pp. 885–899, Balaban International Science Services, Philadelphia). The B′ centers seems to be equivalent to the Q_β centers as defined by other workers (Van Gorkom, H.J., Thielen, A.P.G.M. and Gorren, A.C.F. (1982) in The Function of Quinones in Energy Conserving Systems (Trumpower, B.L., ed.), Academic Press, New York, in the press).     

Analysis of absorption changes in the ultraviolet related to charge-accumulating electron carriers in Photosystem II of chloroplasts

Spinach chloroplasts were dark adapted and then submitted to a sequence of short saturating flashes. The resulting absorption changes in the near ultraviolet were analyzed and attributed to the donor and acceptor sides of Photosystem II. Our results provide a spectroscopic support to some current models of these parts of the photosynthetic electron transport.In Tris-treated chloroplasts (supplied with artificial donors) the absorption changes are largely due to the acceptor side. After each flash the signal decays with a fast phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.2}\text{ms at}\text{9 °}\text{C}$) leaving a stationary level (on a 100-ms time scale). The fast phase has a small amplitude after odd-numbered flashes, whereas the stationary level behaves in a complementary fashion. The non-decaying signal is attributed mostly to the reduced secondary acceptor (A₂^?) and the fast phase to the simultaneous reoxidation of A₂^? and of the reduced primary acceptor (A₁^?). The effect of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea and of redox mediators (ascorbate, ferricyanide) also support this assignment. A fraction of A₂ is shown to be reduced in dark-adapted chloroplasts, as proposed by Velthuys and Amesz (Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1974) 333, 85–94). The difference spectra support the view that A₁^? and A₂^? are plastoquinone radical anions. There are also some absorption changes that we cannot identify.In untreated chloroplasts a non-decaying absorption change (“slow phase”) occurs with a 4-flash periodicity. It is attributed to the transitions among the S states associated with the O₂-evolving complex. A fast phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.2}\text{ms}$) in the decay following the first two flashes behaves like in Tris-treated chloroplasts, so that the assignment is tentatively the same. After the third flash, however, the magnitude of this fast phase is too large according to the hypothesis, so that there may be some contribution from the donor side. The fast phases become slower at lower pH (5.5 instead of 7.6), although there is no evidence for a protonation A₁^? or A₂^?.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

Photosystem II heterogeneity: the acceptor side

It is well known that two photosystems, I and II, are needed to transfer electrons from H₂O to NADP⁺ in oxygenic photosynthesis. Each photosystem consists of several components: (a) the light-harvesting antenna (L-HA) system, (b) the reaction center (RC) complex, and (c) the polypeptides and other co-factors involved in electron and proton transport. First, we present a mini review on the heterogeneity which has been identified with the electron acceptor side of Photosystem II (PS II) including (a) L-HA system: the PS II and PS II units, (b) RC complex containing electron acceptor Q₁ or Q₂; and (c) electron acceptor complex: Q_A (having two different redox potentials Q_L and Q_H) and Q_B (Q_B-type; Q'_B type; and non-Q_B type); additional components such as iron (Q-400), U (E_m,7=–450 mV) and Q-318 (or Aq) are also mentioned. Furthermore, we summarize the current ideas on the so-called inactive (those that transfer electrons to the plastoquinone pool rather slowly) and active reaction centers. Second, we discuss the bearing of the first section on the ratio of the PS II reaction center (RC-II) and the PS I reaction center (RC-I). Third, we review recent results that relate the inactive and active RC-II, obtained by the use of quinones DMQ and DCBQ, with the fluorescence transient at room temperature and in heated spinach and soybean thylakoids. These data show that inactive RC-II can be easily monitored by the OID phase of fluorescence transient and that heating converts active into inactive centers.Abbreviations DCBQ 2,5 or 2,6 dichloro-p-benzoquinone - DMQ dimethylquinone - Q_A primary plastoquinone electron acceptor of photosystem II - Q_B secondary plastoquinone electron acceptor of photosystem II - IODP successive fluorescence levels during time course of chlorophyll a fluorescence: O for origin, I for inflection, D for dip or plateau, and P for peak     

Electronic interactions between iron and the bound semiquinones in bacterial photosynthesis. EPR spectroscopy of oriented cells of Rhodopseudomonas viridis

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of the iron-semiquinone complex in photosynthetic bacterial cells and chromatophores of Rhodopseudomonas viridis is reported. Magnetic fields are used to orient the prolate ellipsoidal-shaped cells which possess a highly ordered internal structure, consisting of concentric, nearly cylindrical membranes. The field-oriented suspension of cells exhibits a highly dichroic EPR signal for the iron-semiquinone complex, showing that the iron possesses a low-symmetry ligand field and exists in a preferred orientation within the native reaction-center membrane complex. The EPR spectrum is analyzed utilizing a spin hamiltonian formalism to extract physical information describing the electronic structure of the iron and the nature of its interaction with the semiquinones. Exact numerical solutions and analytical expressions for the transition frequencies and intensities derived from a perturbation theory expansion are presented, and a computer-simulated spectrum is given. It has been found that, for a model which assumes no preferred orientation within the plane of the membranes, the orientation of the Fe²⁺ ligand axis of largest zero-field splitting (Z, the principal magnetic axis) is titled 64±6° from the membrane normal. The ligand field for Fe²⁺ has low symmetry, with zero-field splitting parameters of |D₁|=7.0±1.3 cm^?1 and |E₁|=1.7±0.5 cm^?1 and $\text{|}\text{E}{}_1\text{D}{}_1\text{|=0.26}$ for the redox state Q₁^?Fe²⁺Q^2?. The rhombic character of the ligand field is increased in the redox state Q₁Fe²⁺Q^?₂, where $\text{0.33>|}\text{E}{}_2\text{D}{}_2\text{|>0.26}$. This indicates that the redox state of the quinones can influence the ligand field symmetry and splitting of the Fe²⁺. There exists an electron-spin exchange interaction between Fe²⁺ and Q^?₁ and Q^?₂, having magnitudes |J₁|=0.12±0.03 cm^?1 and $\text{|J}{}_2\text{|?0.06}\text{cm}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, respectively. Such weak interactions indicate that a proper electronic picture of the complex is as a pair of immobilized semiquinone radicals having very little orbital overlap (probably fostered by superexchange) with the Fe²⁺ orbitals. The exchange interaction is analyzed by comparison with model systems of paramagnetic metals and free radicals to indicate an absence of direct coordination between Fe²⁺ and Q^?₁ and Q^?₂. Selective line-broadening of some of the EPR transitions, involving Q^? coupling to the magnetic sublevels of the Fe²⁺ ground state, is interpreted as arising from an electron-electron dipolar interaction. Analysis of this line-broadening indicates a distance of 6.2–7.8 ? between Fe²⁺ and Q^?₁, thus placing Q₁ outside the immediate coordination shell of Fe²⁺.     

Hydrophobic ion probe studies of membrane dipole potentials

Hydrophobic anions of dipicrylamine and of sodium tetraphenylborate have been employed as probes of interfacial dipole potential variations in lipid bilayer membranes. Systematic variation of dipole potentials has been achieved by introduction of compounds incorporating N⁺ and B^? charge centers. Distribution of hydrophilic and and hydrophobic groups relative to these charge centers has been shown to control the orientation in the membrane/solution interface of the electric dipole moment formed by these centers. Thus triphenyl-[4-trimethylphenylammonium] borate orients with the B^? center, surrounded by phenyl groups, embedded in the membrane, while the smaller methylated N⁺ center is directed toward the aqueous phases. This orientation has been confirmed using dipicrylamine probe ions. Results obtained in this system have been interpreted quantitatively using a previously developed model incorporating discrete charge effects. A second class of compounds, $\text{tri}\text{-n-}\text{alkylamine}$ borane (T_nAB) complexes having the generic formula (C_nH_{$\text{2n+1}$})₃N⁺B^?H₃, have also been synthesized for this study, using even-carbon alkyls ranging from ethyl to decyl. Molecular orientation of the complex is with the N⁺ center and its associated alkyl groups directed into the membranes, while the protonated B^? center is directed toward the aqueous phases, as confirmed by use of tetraphenylborate ions as probes.     

Enthalpy and volume changes accompanying electron transfer from P-870 to quinones in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides reaction centers

A capacitor microphone was used to measure the enthalpy and volume changes that accompany the electron transfer reactions, $\text{PQ}{}_{\mathrm{A}}\text{→}\text{hv}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}{}_{\mathrm{A}}\text{and PQ}{}_{\mathrm{A}}\text{Q}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{→}\text{hv}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{Q}{}_{\mathrm{A}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}{}_{\mathrm{B}}$, following flash excitation of photosynthetic reaction centers isolated from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. P is a bacteriochlorophyll dimer (P-870), and Q_A and Q_B are ubiquinones. In reaction centers containing only Q_A, the enthalpy of P⁺Q^?_A is very close to that of the PQ_A ground state (ΔH_r = 0.05 ± 0.03 eV). The free energy of about 0.65 eV that is captured in the photochemical reaction evidently takes the form of a substantial entropy decrease. In contrast, the formation of P⁺Q_AQ^?_B in reaction centers containing both quinones has a ΔH_r of 0.32 ± 0.02 eV. The entropy change must be near zero in this case. In the presence of o-phenanthroline, which blocks electron transfer between Q^?_A and Q_B, ΔH_r for forming P⁺Q^?_AQ_B is 0.13 ± 0.03 eV. The influence of flash-induced proton uptake on the results was investigated, and the ΔH_r values given above were measured under conditions that minimized this influence. Although the reductions of Q_A and Q_B involve very different changes in enthalpy and entropy, both reactions are accompanied by a similar volume decrease of about 20 ml/mol. The contraction probably reflects electrostriction caused by the charges on P⁺ and Q^?_A or Q^?_B.     

The location of redox centers in the profile structure of a reconstituted membrane containing a photosynthetic reaction center-cytochrome c complex by resonance X-ray diffraction

The technique of resonance X-ray diffraction (Blasie, J.K. and Stamatoff, J. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 10, 451–452) utilizing synchrotron radiation was used to determine the locations of the cytochrome c heme iron atom and the photosynthetic reaction center iron atom within the profile of a reconstituted membrane. The accuracy of these determinations was better than ±2 ?. The cytochrome c heme iron atom → reaction center iron atom vector was determined to have a magnitude of approx. 44 ? projected onto the membrane profile and to span most of the lipid hydrocarbon core of the membrane profile. Since the reaction center iron atom interacts magnetically with the primary quinone electron acceptor Q_I over a distance of less than 10 ?, the primary light-induced electron-transfer reactions for this system generate the electric charge separation between oxidized cytochrome c⁺ and Fe-Q^?_I across most (approx. $\text{2}\text{3}$) of the membrane profile including most or all of the lipid hydrocarbon core of the membrane.     

EPR studies on a Hipip type iron-sulfur center in the succinate dehydrogenase segment of the respiratory chain

In addition to the two species of ferredoxin-type iron-sulfur centers (Centers S-1 and S-2), a Hipip-type iron-sulfur center (Center S-3) has been detected in the reconstitutively active soluble succinate dehydrogenases. E_m7,4 determined in a particulate, antimycin A sensitive succinate-cytochrome $\text{c}$ reductase is +60 ± 15 mV. This center is extremely labile towards oxygen in a manner similar to the reconstitutive activity of the dehydrogenase. Even freshly prepared reconstitutively active enzyme shows a considerably diminished content of Center S-3 relative to flavin and displays a partly modified spectra. All reconstitutively inactive dehydrogenases give rise to a highly modified or no Center S-3 spectra at all. These observations indicate that Center S-3 is a constituent of succinate dehydrogenase and plays a role in the physiological function of the enzyme, $\text{i.e.}$ transferring electrons most probably to ubiquinone.