Identification of the core-histone-binding domains of HMG1 and HMG2

High mobility group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins are a group of abundant, conservative and highly charged nuclear proteins whose physiological role in chromatin is still unknown. To gain insight into the interactions of HMG1 and HMG2 with the fundamental components of chromatin we have introduced the methodology of photochemical crosslinking. This technique has allowed us to study the interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 with the core histones, in the form of an H2A X H2B dimer and an (H3 X H4)2 tetramer, for an effective time of crosslinking of less than 1 ms and under very mild conditions. This is achieved by using flash photolysis. With this procedure we found that both HMG1 and HMG2 interact with H2A X H2B and also with (H3 X H4)2. In the second case, they seem to do this through histone H3. To obtain more information about the interactions, we split HMG1 and HMG2 into their peptides using staphylococcal proteinase. The peptides obtained, which reflect the domain distribution of these proteins, were then used along with the histone oligomers to elucidate their interactions by means of photochemical crosslinking. Results obtained indicate that the domain of HMG1 and HMG2 involved in the interaction with H2A X H2B histones is the highly acidic C-terminal, whereas the N-terminal is involved in the interactions with (H3 X H4)2 histones. In all cases, the interactions found appear appreciably strong. Along with other data published in the literature, these proteins appear to have at least one binding site per domain for the chromatin components.     

Differential binding of chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to superhelical DNA

The binding of chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to various DNA structures was examined by a nitrocellulose filter binding assay using a 32P labelled supercoiled plasmid. Binding assays and competition experiments indicated that HMG2 has a higher affinity than HMG1 for supercoiled DNA. Studies at various ionic strengths and pH values reveal differences in the interaction of the two proteins with DNA. The results suggest that HMG1 and HMG2 are involved in distinguishable cellular functions.     

Occurrence of five different chromosomal HMG1 proteins in various maize tissues

The nuclear HMG1 proteins of higher plants are small non-histone proteins that have DNA-bending activity and are considered architectural factors in chromatin. The occurrence of the chromosomal HMG1 proteins, HMGa, HMGc1/2 and HMGd, in various maize tissues was analyzed, and in the course of these studies a novel HMG1 protein, now termed HMGe, was identified. Purification and characterization of HMGe (M_r 13 655) and cloning of the corresponding cDNA revealed that it displays only moderate similarity to other members of the plant HMG1 protein family. The five maize HMG1 proteins could be detected in kernels, leaves, roots and suspension culture cells, indicating that these proteins can be expressed simultaneously and occur relatively ubiquitously. However, the various HMG1 proteins are present in significantly different quantities with HMGa and HMGc1/2 being the most abundant HMG1 proteins in all tissues tested. Furthermore, the relative amounts of the various HMG1 proteins differ among the tissues examined. The HMG1 proteins were found to be relatively stable proteins in vivo, with HMGc1/2, HMGd and HMGe having a half-life of ca. 50 h in cultured cells, while the half-life of the HMGa protein is ca. 65 h. Collectively, these findings are compatible with the concept that the different plant HMG1 proteins might act as general architectural proteins in concert with site-specific factors in the assembly of certain nucleoprotein structures involved in various biological processes.     

Comparative studies on microinjected high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins, HMG1 and HMG2

The nonhistone chromosomal proteins, HMG1 and HMG2, were iodinated and introduced into HeLa cells, bovine fibroblasts, or mouse 3T3 cells by erythrocyte-mediated microinjection. Autoradiographic analysis of injected cells fixed with glutaraldehyde consistently showed both molecules concentrated within nuclei. Fixation with methanol, on the other hand, resulted in some leakage of the microinjected proteins from the nuclei so that more autoradiographic grains appeared over the cytoplasm or outside the cells. Both injected and endogenous HMG1 and HMG2 partitioned unexpectedly upon fractionation of bovine fibroblasts, HeLa, or 3T3 cells, appearing in the cytoplasmic fractions. However, in calf thymus, HMG1 and HMG2 molecules appeared in the 0.35 M NaCl extract of isolated nuclei, as expected. These observations show that the binding of HMG1 and HMG2 to chromatin differs among cell types or that other tissue-specific components can influence their binding. Coinjection of [125I]HMG1 and [131I]HMG2 into HeLa cells revealed that the two molecules display virtually equivalent distributions upon cell fractionation, identical stability, identical intracellular distributions, and equal rates of equilibration between nuclei. In addition, HMG1 and HMG2 did not differ in their partitioning upon fractionation nor in their stability in growing vs. nongrowing 3T3 cells. Thus, we have not detected any significant differences in the intracellular behavior of HMG1 and HMG2 after microinjection into human, bovine, or murine cells.     

DNA binding by single HMG box model proteins

The HMG1/2 family is a large group of proteins that share a conserved sequence of ~80 amino acids rich in basic, aromatic and proline side chains, referred to as an HMG box. Previous studies show that HMG boxes can bind to DNA in a structure-specific manner. To define the basis for DNA recognition by HMG boxes, we characterize the interaction of two model HMG boxes, one a structure-specific box, rHMGb from the rat HMG1 protein, the other a sequence-specific box, Rox1 from yeast, with oligodeoxynucleotide substrates. Both proteins interact with single-stranded oligonucleotides in this study to form 1:1 complexes. The stoichiometry of binding of rHMGb to duplex or branched DNAs differs: for a 16mer duplex we find a weak 2:1 complex, while a 4:1 protein:DNA complex is detected with a four-way DNA junction of 16mers in the presence of Mg²⁺. In the case of the sequence-specific Rox1 protein we find tight 1:1 and 2:1 complexes with its cognate duplex sequence and again a 4:1 complex with four-way branched DNA. If the DNA branching is reduced to three arms, both proteins form 3:1 complexes. We believe that these multimeric complexes are relevant for HMG1/2 proteins in vivo, since Mg²⁺ is present in the nucleus and these proteins are expressed at a very high level.     

High affinity binding of proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to semicatenated DNA loops

Background  

Proteins HMG1 and HMG2 are two of the most abundant non histone proteins in the nucleus of mammalian cells, and contain a domain of homology with many proteins implicated in the control of development, such as the sex-determination factor Sry and the Sox family of proteins. In vitro studies of interactions of HMG1/2 with DNA have shown that these proteins can bind to many unusual DNA structures, in particular to four-way junctions, with binding affinities of 10⁷ to 10⁹ M^-1.     

Non-random reconstitution of HMG1 and HMG2 in chromatin. Determination of the histone contacts

We have studied how non-histone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 interact with rat liver chromatin using reconstitution and chemical cross-linking procedures. Both proteins were found to associate to chromatin only to some extent and always with a marked preference for short oligonucleosomes, mainly mono- and dinucleosomes. However, a slight reconstitution with the long polynucleosomal fraction can be observed in H1-depleted chromatin. Reconstitution is non-random and a clear preference for regions highly sensitive to staphylococcal nuclease (EC 3.1.31.1) is observed. Chemical cross-linking has allowed us to identify H1, H2A and H2B as the histones contacted by HMG1 and HMG2 upon reconstitution. Also, we present evidence that HMG1 and HMG2 interact with the nucleosomal particle without replacing H1 or any other histone.     

Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 unwind DNA double helix.

In a previous communication we have shown that both HMG1 and HMG2 nonhistone proteins change the DNA helical structure and the binding of HMG1 and HMG2 to DNA induces a net unwinding equivalent of DNA double helix (Javaherian, K., Liu, L. F. and Wang, J. C. (1978) Science, 199, 1345-1346). Employing melting absorption technique, we now show that in the presence of salt HMG1 and HMG2 destabilize DNA whereas in the absence of salt, they both stabilize DNA molecules. Consequently the folded structure of HMG must play an important role in melting DNA. Furthermore, by measuring topological winding number using competition unwinding experiments, we conclude that HMG1 has a higher affinity for a single-stranded DNA relative to double-stranded DNA. These results together suggest that HMG1 and HMG2 unwind DNA double helix by local denaturation of the DNA base pairs. The net unwinding angles have been measured to be 22 degrees and 26 degrees per molecule of HMG1 and HMG2 respectively.     

Analysis of age-associated alteration in the synthesis of HMG nonhistone proteins of the rat liver

HMG proteins were extracted with 5% PCA or 0.35 M NaCl from whole tissue, nuclei or chromatin of the liver of young (19 weeks) and old (118 weeks) male rats. They were resolved on acetic acid-urea polyacrylamide gel. The electrophoretic patterns of the major HMG proteins 1, 2, 14 and 17 of both ages are similar. The in vitro synthesis of HMG 1 and 2 decreases, but that of HMG 14 and 17 increases considerably in the liver of old rats. The synthesis of different HMG proteins is modulated differentially by spermine, butyrate, dexamethasone and 3-aminobenzamide in the liver of young and old rats. These findings suggest that HMG proteins contribute to alterations in the organization of chromatin and expression of genes during aging.     

Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 suppress the nucleosome assembly at physiological ionic strength

The effect of nonhistone protein HMG1 and HMG2 from pig thymus on the in vitro nucleosome assembly has been examined with plasmid pSV2-gpt DNA and pig thymus core histones in the presence of DNA topoisomerase I. In the absence of core histones, the direct binding of HMG proteins could induce negative superhelical turns in DNA at low ionic strength, but not at physiological ionic strength. The nucleosome formation in the higher histone-to-DNA ratios at physiological ionic strength was not facilitated by HMG proteins, in contrast to poly(L-glutamic acid). HMG proteins suppressed the nucleosome assembly in the moderate histone-to-DNA ratios, resulting in the reduction of fully supercoiled DNA topoisomers. The suppression by HMG proteins was not cancelled by poly(L-glutamic acid). These suggest that the highly acidic carboxy terminal of HMG proteins does not act as an assembly factor, and that the HMG proteins, on the contrary, suppress the nucleosome formation, probably by binding to DNA in a way to inhibit the assembly into core particles.     

Interaction of non-histone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in nucleosomes and core particles revealed by chemical cross-linking

Chemical cross-linking was used to study the interaction of the non-histone chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in H1,H5-depleted nucleosomes or core particles. Cross-linking with a 'zero-length' cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide and with a longer (cleavable) cross-linker dimethyl-3,3'-dithiobispropionimidate revealed an interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 with (or proximity to) core histones in both types of particles. These results indicated that the presence of the 40-50-base-pairs-long segment of the 'linker' DNA in nucleosomes was not necessary for the establishment of mutual contacts of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with core histones. Possible implications of the interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with histones for the structure and functioning of chromatin are discussed.     

Isolation of high-mobility-group proteins HMG1 and HMG2 in non denaturing conditions and comparison of their properties with those of acid-extracted proteins

We describe a method for isolation and purification of the chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 in non-denaturing conditions which overcomes the difficulties of the published methods concerning yield and purity. The method is based on salt extraction, selective precipitation with ammonium sulfate and DEAE-cellulose chromatography. All studied properties of these proteins (formation of protein tetramers, enhancement of micrococcal nuclease digestion of DNA and chromatin, and protection of 165-basepair DNA in chromatosome) differ significantly from the properties of HMG1 and 2 isolated under denaturing conditions.     

Characterization of HMG2 complement changes in chicken tissues

Variations in the content of nonhistone proteins high mobility group 2a (HMG2a) and HMG2b have been determined in several cell types of chicken. HMG2a was found to accumulate during erythrocyte maturation. HMG2b is the major HMG2 subtype in testis and reaches the highest proportion, detected so far, in spermatid cells obtained by centrifugal elutriation. In hepatocytes HMG2b is barely detectable and HMG2a is the major subtype. In conclusion, the pattern of HMG2 composition is different in three quiescent and terminally differentiated cell types, no correlation between the state of cell proliferation and HMG2 composition can be established.     

The HMG1 ta(i)le

We have studied structural changes in DNA/protein complexes using the CD spectroscopy, upon the interaction of HMG1-domains with calf thymus DNA at different ionic strengths. HMG1 protein isolated from calf thymus and recombinant HMG1-(A+B) protein were used. Recombinant protein HMG1-(A+B) represents a rat HMG1 lacking C-terminal acidic tail. At low ionic strength (15 mM NaCl) we observed similar behavior of both proteins upon interaction with DNA. Despite this, at higher ionic strength (150 mM NaCl) their interaction with DNA leads to a completely different structure of the complexes. In the case of HMG1-(A+B)/DNA complexes we observed the appearance of DNA fractions possessing very high optical activity. This could be a result of formation of the highly-ordered DNA structures modulated by the interaction with HMG1-domains. Thus the comparison studies of HMG1 and HMG1-(A+B) interaction with DNA show that negatively charged C-terminal tail of HMG1 modulates interaction of the protein with DNA. The striking difference of the behaviour of these two systems allows us to explain the functional role of multiple HMG1 domains in some regulatory and architectural proteins.