Protein import into cyanelles and complex chloroplasts

Higher-plant, green and red algal chloroplasts are surrounded by a double membrane envelope. The glaucocystophyte plastid (cyanelle) has retained a prokaryotic cell wall between the two envelope membranes. The complex chloroplasts of Euglena and dinoflagellates are surrounded by three membranes while the complex chloroplasts of chlorarachniophytes, cryptomonads, brown algae, diatoms and other chromophytes, are surrounded by 4 membranes. The peptidoglycan layer of the cyanelle envelope and the additional membranes of complex chloroplasts provide barriers to chloroplast protein import not present in the simpler double membrane chloroplast envelope. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import experiments indicate that proteins are imported directly from the cytoplasm across the two envelope membranes and peptidoglycan layer into cyanelles. Protein import into complex chloroplasts is however fundamentally different. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import into microsomal membranes has shown that translocation into the ER is the first step for protein import into complex chloroplasts enclosed by three or four membranes. In vivo pulse chase experiments and immunoelectronmicroscopy have shown that in Euglena, proteins are transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus prior to import across the three chloroplast membranes. Ultrastructural studies and the presence of ribosomes on the outermost of the four envelope membranes suggests protein import into 4 membrane-bounded complex chloroplasts is directly from the ER like outermost membrane into the chloroplast. The fundamental difference in import mechanisms, post-translational direct chloroplast import or co-translational translocation into the ER prior to chloroplast import, appears to reflect the evolutionary origin of the different chloroplast types. Chloroplasts with a two-membrane envelope are thought to have evolved through the primary endosymbiotic association between a eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic prokaryote while complex chloroplasts are believed to have evolved through a secondary endosymbiotic association between a heterotrophic or possibly phototrophic eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic eukaryote.     

Maize non-photosynthetic ferredoxin precursor is mis-sorted to the intermembrane space of chloroplasts in the presence of light

Preprotein translocation across the outer and inner envelope membranes of chloroplasts is an energy-dependent process requiring ATP hydrolysis. Several precursor proteins analyzed so far have been found to be imported into isolated chloroplasts equally well in the dark in the presence of ATP as in the light where ATP is supplied by photophosphorylation in the chloroplasts themselves. We demonstrate here that precursors of two maize (Zea mays L. cv Golden Cross Bantam) ferredoxin isoproteins, pFdI and pFdIII, show distinct characteristics of import into maize chloroplasts. pFdI, a photosynthetic ferredoxin precursor, was efficiently imported into the stroma of isolated maize chloroplasts both in the light and in the dark. In contrast pFdIII, a non-photosynthetic ferredoxin precursor, was mostly mis-sorted to the intermembrane space of chloroplastic envelopes as an unprocessed precursor form in the light but was efficiently imported into the stroma and processed to its mature form in the dark. The mis-sorted pFdIII, which accumulated in the intermembrane space in the light, could not undergo subsequent import into the stroma in the dark, even in the presence of ATP. However, when the mis-sorted pFdIII was recovered and used for a separate import reaction, pFdIII was capable of import into the chloroplasts in the dark. pFNRII, a ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase isoprotein precursor, showed import characteristics similar to those of pFdIII. Moreover, pFdIII exhibited similar import characteristics with chloroplasts isolated from wheat (Pennisetum americanum) and pea (Pisum sativum cv Alaska). These findings suggest that the translocation of precursor proteins across the envelope membranes of chloroplasts may involve substrate-dependent light-regulated mechanisms.     

Stromal Hsp70 Is Important for Protein Translocation into Pea and Arabidopsis Chloroplasts

Hsp70 family proteins function as motors driving protein translocation into mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum. Whether Hsp70 is involved in protein import into chloroplasts has not been resolved. We show here Arabidopsis thaliana knockout mutants of either of the two stromal cpHsc70s, cpHsc70-1 and cpHsc70-2, are defective in protein import into chloroplasts during early developmental stages. Protein import was found to be affected at the step of precursor translocation across the envelope membranes. From solubilized envelope membranes, stromal cpHsc70 was specifically coimmunoprecipitated with importing precursors and stoichiometric amounts of Tic110 and Hsp93. Moreover, in contrast with receptors at the outer envelope membrane, cpHsp70 is important for the import of both photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic proteins. These data indicate that cpHsc70 is part of the chloroplast translocon for general import and is important for driving translocation into the stroma. We further analyzed the relationship of cpHsc70 with the other suggested motor system, Hsp93/Tic40. Chloroplasts from the cphsc70-1 hsp93-V double mutant had a more severe import defect than did the single mutants, suggesting that the two proteins function in parallel. The cphsc70-1 tic40 double knockout was lethal, further indicating that cpHsc70-1 and Tic40 have an overlapping essential function. In conclusion, our data indicate that chloroplasts have two chaperone systems facilitating protein translocation into the stroma: the cpHsc70 system and the Hsp93/Tic40 system.     

Protein import into chloroplasts

Most chloroplastic proteins are encoded in the nucleus, synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and subsequently imported into the organelle. In general, proteins destined for the chloroplast are synthesized as precursor proteins with a cleavable N-terminal presequence that mediates routing to the inside of the chloroplast. These precursor proteins have to be targeted to the correct organellar membrane surface after their release from the ribosome and furthermore they have to be maintained in a conformation suitable for translocation across the two envelope membranes. Recognition and import of most chloroplastic precursor proteins are accomplished by a jointly used translocation apparatus. Different but complementary studies of several groups converged recently in the identification of the outer envelope proteins OEP86, OEP75, OEP70 (a Hsp 70-related protein), OEP34, and of the inner envelope protein IEP110 as components of this translocation machinery. None of these proteins, except for OEP70, shows any homology to components of other protein translocases. The plastid import machinery thus seems to be an original development in evolution. Following translocation into the organelle, chloroplastic proteins are sorted to their suborganellar destination, i.e., the inner envelope membrane, the thylakoid membrane, and the thylakoid lumen. This structural and evolutionary complexity of chloroplasts is reflected by a variety of routing mechanisms by which proteins reach their final location once inside the organelle. This review will focus on recent advances in the identification of components of the chloroplastic protein import machinery, and new insights into the pathways of inter-and intraorganellar sorting.     

Stable association of chloroplastic precursors with protein translocation complexes that contain proteins from both envelope membranes and a stromal Hsp100 molecular chaperone.

Cytoplasmically synthesized precursors interact with translocation components in both the outer and inner envelope membranes during transport into chloroplasts. Using co-immunoprecipitation techniques, with antibodies specific to known translocation components, we identified stable interactions between precursor proteins and their associated membrane translocation components in detergent-solubilized chloroplastic membrane fractions. Antibodies specific to the outer envelope translocation components OEP75 and OEP34, the inner envelope translocation component IEP110 and the stromal Hsp100, ClpC, specifically co-immunoprecipitated precursor proteins under limiting ATP conditions, a stage we have called docking. A portion of these same translocation components was co-immunoprecipitated as a complex, and could also be detected by co-sedimentation through a sucrose density gradient. ClpC was observed only in complexes with those precursors utilizing the general import apparatus, and its interaction with precursor-containing translocation complexes was destabilized by ATP. Finally, ClpC was co-immunoprecipitated with a portion of the translocation components of both outer and inner envelope membranes, even in the absence of added precursors. We discuss possible roles for stromal Hsp100 in protein import and mechanisms of precursor binding in chloroplasts.     

Transport of proteins into chloroplasts

The import of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins into chloroplasts involves an interaction between at least two components; the precursor protein, and the import apparatus in the chloroplast envelope membrane. This review summarizes the information available about each of these components. Precursor proteins consist of an amino terminal transit peptide attached to a passenger protein. Transit peptides from various precurosrs are diverse with respect to length and amino acid sequence; analysis of their sequences has not revealed insight into their mode of action. A variety of foreign passenger proteins can be imported into chloroplasts when a transit peptide is present at the amino terminus. However, foreign passenger proteins are not imported as efficiently as natural passenger proteins, and some chimeric precursor proteins are not imported into chloroplasts at all. Therefore, the passenger protein, as well as the transit peptide, influences the import process. Import begins by binding of the precursor to the chloroplast surface. It has been suggested that this binding is mediated by a receptor, but evidence to support this hypothesis remains incomplete and a receptor protein has not yet been characterized. Protein translocation requires energy derived from ATP hydrolysis, although there are conflicting reports as to where hydrolysis occurs and it is unclear how this energy is utilized. The mechanism(s) whereby proteins are translocated across either the two envelope membranes or the thylakoid membrane is not known.Abbreviations EPSP 5-enolpyruvyulshikimate-3-phosphate - LHCP Chlorophyll a/b binding protein of the light-harvesting complex - NPT-II Neomycin phosphotransferase II - PC Plastocyanin - Pr Precursor - Rubisco Ribulose-1,5,-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase - SS Small subunit of Rubisco     

Analysis of chloroplast transit peptide function using mutations in the carboxyl-terminal region

Protein import into chloroplasts requires a transit peptide, which interacts with the chloroplast transport apparatus and leads to translocation of the protein across the chloroplast envelope. While the amino acid sequences of many transit peptides are known, functional domains have been difficult to identify. Previous studies suggest that the carboxyl terminus of the transit peptide for ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit is important for both translocation across the chloroplast envelope and proper processing of the precursor protein. We dissected this region using in vitro mutagenesis, creating a set of mutants with small changes in primary structure predicted to cause alterations in secondary structure. The import behavior of the mutant proteins was assessed using isolated chloroplasts. Our results show that removal of a conserved arginine residue in this region results in impaired processing, but does not necessarily affect import rates. In contrast, substituting amino acids with low reverse turn or amphiphilic potential for other original residues affected import rate but not processing.     

Targeting of proteins to the thylakoid lumen by the bipartite transit peptide of the 33 kd oxygen-evolving protein.

Various chimeric precursors and deletions of the 33 kd oxygen-evolving protein (OEE1) were constructed to study the mechanism by which chloroplast proteins are imported and targeted to the thylakoid lumen. The native OEE1 precursor was imported into isolated chloroplasts, processed and localized in the thylakoid lumen. Replacement of the OEE1 transit peptide with the transit peptide of the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, a stromal protein, resulted in redirection of mature OEE1 into the stromal compartment of the chloroplast. Utilizing chimeric transit peptides and block deletions we demonstrated that the 85 residue OEE1 transit peptide contains separate signal domains for importing and targeting the thylakoid lumen. The importing domain, which mediates translocation across the two membranes of the chloroplast envelope, is present in the N-terminal 58 amino acids. The thylakoid lumen targeting domain, which mediates translocation across the thylakoid membrane, is located within the C-terminal 27 residues of the OEE1 transit peptide. Chimeric precursors were constructed and used in in vitro import experiments to demonstrate that the OEE1 transit peptide is capable of importing and targeting foreign proteins to the thylakoid lumen.     

From nuclear genes to chloroplast localized proteins

There is broad evidence that an endosymbiotic uptake of a cyanobacterial-type organism was the point of origin for the evolution of chloroplasts. During organelle evolution extensive gene transfer from the symbiont to the host genome occurred, which raises the question of how these gene products, namely proteins, which are still functional in chloroplasts, find their way back ‘home’. Nuclear-encoded proteins enter plastids via a complex import machinery that requires the coordinate interplay of a variety of soluble and membrane-bound factors on the cytosolic site as well as on the stromal side of the chloroplast envelope membranes. We define that the process called ‘import of chloroplast precursor proteins’ begins with the release of the polypeptide from the ribosomes and binding to cytosolic factors, such as a guidance complex, which accompanies (chaperones) proteins to chloroplasts. The translocation across the envelope membranes engages distinct translocation machineries at the outer and the inner envelope membranes. Additionally subsequent sorting events to different subcompartments within the plastids are operated by a number of distinct pathways, all of which seem to involve multiple subunits, which are largely of bacterial (symbiotic) origin. The evolutionary history of proteins mediating the import of chloroplast constituents across the envelope membranes seems more diverse. Since cyanobacteria lack a protein import pathway, it is not surprising that only a few subunits of the chloroplast translocon seem to be of symbiotic origin while others seem to be eukaryotic additions.     

Identification of Protein Transport Complexes in the Chloroplastic Envelope Membranes via Chemical Cross-Linking

Transport of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins into chloroplasts uses an import machinery present in the envelope membranes. To identify the components of this machinery and to begin to examine how these components interact during transport, chemical cross-linking was performed on intact chloroplasts containing precursor proteins trapped at a particular stage of transport by ATP limitation. Large crosslinked complexes were observed using three different reversible homobifunctional cross-linkers. Three outer envelope membrane proteins (OEP86, OEP75, and OEP34) and one inner envelope membrane protein (IEP110), previously reported to be involved in protein import, were identified as components of these complexes. In addition to these membrane proteins, a stromal member of the hsp100 family, ClpC, was also present in the complexes. We propose that ClpC functions as a molecular chaperone, cooperating with other components to accomplish the transport of precursor proteins into chloroplasts. We also propose that each envelope membrane contains distinct translocation complexes and that a portion of these interact to form contact sites even in the absence of precursor proteins.     

Internal ATP is the only energy requirement for the translocation of precursor proteins across chloroplastic membranes

The energy requirements for the import of nuclear-encoded proteins into isolated chloroplasts have been reinvestigated. We have shown that, in contrast to protein import into mitochondria, the translocation of the precursors to ferredoxin, plastocyanin (prPC) and the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (prSS) across all chloroplastic membranes is independent of a protonmotive force and requires only ATP. This extends previous works in which investigations were limited to prSS and demonstrates that our results are probably general to all chloroplastic protein precursors. Our results are particularly interesting for the import of prPC, since in addition to the two envelope membranes, this protein must traverse the energy-transducing thylakoid membranes en route to its proper location in the thylakoid lumen. This lack of involvement of a protonmotive force, specifically of a transmembrane electric potential, demonstrates that separate mechanisms operate during the import of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria. We also examined the question of whether ATP is utilized inside or outside of chloroplasts during protein import. Previous attempts to resolve this question have resulted in conflicting answers. We found, by two independent approaches, that ATP for protein import is utilized inside chloroplasts. The implications of these results on the possible mechanisms of protein import into chloroplasts are discussed.     

Energy dependence of protein translocation into chloroplasts

The translocation of in vitro synthesized precursor proteins into intact spinach chloroplasts was investigated with respect to its energy requirement. It was demonstrated that MgATP itself, and not a transmembrane electrochemical gradient across the envelope membrane, promotes protein import. By manipulating the external and the stromal level of MgATP, we provided evidence that MgATP energized the protein import not within the chloroplast but at the outside of the envelope membrane. It is postulated that an MgATP-dependent phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle at the outer membrane face was involved in the course of protein translocation into the chloroplast.     

Molecular chaperones involved in chloroplast protein import.

Transport of cytoplasmically synthesized precursor proteins into chloroplasts, like the protein transport systems of mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum, appears to require the action of molecular chaperones. These molecules are likely to be the sites of the ATP hydrolysis required for precursor proteins to bind to and be translocated across the two membranes of the chloroplast envelope. Over the past decade, several different chaperones have been identified, based mainly on their association with precursor proteins and/or components of the chloroplast import complex, as putative factors mediating chloroplast protein import. These factors include cytoplasmic, chloroplast envelope-associated and stromal members of the Hsp70 family of chaperones, as well as stromal Hsp100 and Hsp60 chaperones and a cytoplasmic 14-3-3 protein. While many of the findings regarding the action of chaperones during chloroplast protein import parallel those seen for mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum protein transport, the chloroplast import system also has unique aspects, including its hypothesized use of an Hsp100 chaperone to drive translocation into the organelle interior. Many questions concerning the specific functions of chaperones during protein import into chloroplasts still remain that future studies, both biochemical and genetic, will need to address.     

Conservative sorting in a primitive plastid. The cyanelle of Cyanophora paradoxa

Higher plant chloroplasts possess at least four different pathways for protein translocation across and protein integration into the thylakoid membranes. It is of interest with respect to plastid evolution, which pathways have been retained as a relic from the cyanobacterial ancestor ('conservative sorting'), which ones have been kept but modified, and which ones were developed at the organelle stage, i.e. are eukaryotic achievements as (largely) the Toc and Tic translocons for envelope import of cytosolic precursor proteins. In the absence of data on cyanobacterial protein translocation, the cyanelles of the glaucocystophyte alga Cyanophora paradoxa for which in vitro systems for protein import and intraorganellar sorting were elaborated can serve as a model: the cyanelles are surrounded by a peptidoglycan wall, their thylakoids are covered with phycobilisomes and the composition of their oxygen-evolving complex is another feature shared with cyanobacteria. We demonstrate the operation of the Sec and Tat pathways in cyanelles and show for the first time in vitro protein import across cyanobacteria-like thylakoid membranes and protease protection of the mature protein.     

Specific lipids influence the import capacity of the chloroplast outer envelope precursor protein translocon

Recent studies demonstrated that lipids influence the assembly and efficiency of membrane-embedded macromolecular complexes. Similarly, lipids have been found to influence chloroplast precursor protein binding to the membrane surface and to be associated with the Translocon of the Outer membrane of Chloroplasts (TOC). We used a system based on chloroplast outer envelope vesicles from Pisum sativum to obtain an initial understanding of the influence of lipids on precursor protein translocation across the outer envelope. The ability of the model precursor proteins p(OE33)titin and pSSU to be recognized and translocated in this simplified system was investigated. We demonstrate that transport across the outer membrane can be observed in the absence of the inner envelope translocon. The translocation, however, was significantly slower than that observed for chloroplasts. Enrichment of outer envelope vesicles with different lipids natively found in chloroplast membranes altered the binding and transport behavior. Further, the results obtained using outer envelope vesicles were consistent with the results observed for the reconstituted isolated TOC complex. Based on both approaches we concluded that the lipids sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (SQDG) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) increased TOC-mediated binding and import for both precursor proteins. In contrast, enrichment in digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) improved TOC-mediated binding for pSSU, but decreased import for both precursor proteins. Optimal import occurred only in a narrow concentration range of DGDG.     

Identification of intermediates in the pathway of protein import into chloroplasts and their localization to envelope contact sites

We have used a hybrid precursor protein to study the pathway of protein import into chloroplasts. This hybrid (pS/protA) consists of the precursor to the small subunit of Rubisco (pS) fused to the IgG binding domains of staphylococcal protein A. The pS/protA is efficiently imported into isolated chloroplasts and is processed to its mature form (S/protA). In addition to the mature stromal form, two intermediates in the pathway of pS/protA import were identified at early time points in the import reaction. The first intermediate represents unprocessed pS/protA bound to the outer surface of the chloroplast envelope and is analogous to a previously characterized form of pS that is specifically bound to the chloroplast surface and can be subsequently translocated in the stroma (Cline, K., M. Werner-Washburne, T. H. Lubben, and K. Keegstra. 1985. J. Biol. Chem. 260:3691-3696.) The second intermediate represents a partially translocated form of the precursor that remains associated with the envelope membrane. This form is processed to mature S/protA, but remains susceptible to exogenously added protease in intact chloroplasts. We conclude that the envelope associated S/protA is spanning both the outer and inner chloroplast membranes en route to the stroma. Biochemical and immunochemical localization of the two translocation intermediates indicates that both forms are exposed at the surface of the outer membrane at sites where the outer and inner membrane are closely apposed. These contact zones appear to be organized in a reticular network on the outer envelope. We propose a model for protein import into chloroplasts that has as its central features two distinct protein conducting channels in the outer and inner envelope membranes, each gated open by a distinct subdomain of the pS signal sequence.     

Targeting of proteins to the outer envelope membrane uses a different pathway than transport into chloroplasts.

The chloroplastic envelope is composed of two membranes, inner and outer, each with a distinct set of polypeptides. Like proteins in other chloroplastic compartments, most envelope proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and post-translationally imported into chloroplasts. Considerable knowledge has been obtained concerning protein import proteins. We isolated a cDNA clone from pea that encodes a 14-kilodalton outer envelope membrane protein. The precursor form of this protein does not possess a cleavable transit peptide and its import into isolated chloroplasts does not require either ATP or a thermolysin-sensitive component on the chloroplastic surface. These findings, together with similar observations made with a spinach chloroplastic outer membrane protein, led us to propose that proteins destined for the outer membrane of the chloroplastic envelope follow an import pathway distinct from that followed by proteins destined for other chloroplastic compartments.     

Protein targeting across the three membranes of the Euglena chloroplast envelope.

A system has been developed for the import in vitro of precursor proteins into Euglena chloroplasts, which have three envelope membranes. Preparation of functional chloroplasts with intact envelope membranes has been optimized. Import of the precursor (50 kDa) for the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis enzyme porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), and processing to the mature size (40 kDa), occurred at 25 degrees C in the light and the presence of ATP, with an estimated efficiency of 62%. Pretreatment of the chloroplasts with proteases abolished this import, suggesting the involvement of specific protein receptors. The presequence of PBGD was found to be cleaved by Escherichia coli leader peptidase to an intermediate form (46 kDa). A construct in which the first 30 residues of the presequence (presumed to be the region removed by leader peptidase) had been deleted was no longer imported. Neither prePBGD nor the truncated precursor were imported into pea chloroplasts, although both bound to the pea chloroplast envelope. Conversely, a chimeric construct, in which the mature PBGD protein was fused downstream of the transit peptide for pea ferredoxin-NADP reductase, was efficiently imported into pea chloroplasts and processed to the mature size. However, this was not imported into Euglena chloroplasts, although again it bound to them. These results provide preliminary evidence for the possibility of two functional domains within the Euglena PBGD presequence. The implications of these findings with respect to the evolution of Euglena chloroplasts are discussed.     

Protein import into chloroplasts: new aspects of a well-known topic

Protein import into plant chloroplasts is a fascinating topic that is being investigated by many research groups. Since the majority of chloroplast proteins are synthesised as precursor proteins in the cytosol, they have to be posttranslationally imported into the organelle. For this purpose, most preproteins are synthesised with an N-terminal presequence, which is both necessary and sufficient for organelle recognition and translocation initiation. The import of preproteins is facilitated by two translocation machineries in the outer and inner envelope of chloroplasts, the Toc and Tic complexes, respectively. Translocation of precursor proteins across the envelope membrane has to be highly regulated to react to the metabolic requirements of the organelle. The aim of this review is to summarise the events that take place at the translocation machineries that are known so far. In addition, we focus in particular on alternative import pathways and the aspect of regulation of protein transport at the outer and inner envelope membrane.     

Current views on chloroplast protein import and hypotheses on the origin of the transport mechanism

Most chloroplastic proteins are synthesized as precursors in the cytosol prior to their transport into chloroplasts. These precursors are generally synthesized in a form that is larger than the mature form found inside chloroplasts. The extra amino acids, called transit peptides, are present at the amino terminus. The transit peptide is necessary and sufficient to recognize the chloroplast and induce movement of the attached protein across the envelope membranes. In this review, we discuss the primary and secondary structure of transit peptides, describe what is known about the import process, and present some hypotheses on the evolutionary origin of the import mechanism.Abbreviations DHFR dihydrofolate reductase - EPSP synthase 5-enolpyrovylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase; hsp heat-shock protein - LHCP II light-harvesting chlorophylla/b binding protein - OEE 16, 23, and 33 the 16-, 23-, and 33-kDa proteins of the oxygen-evolving complex - pr precursor - rubisco ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase - SS rubisco small subunit