A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Eukaryotic chromosomes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete higher order chromatin domains. This organization is believed to be important not only in the compaction of the chromatin fiber, but also in the utilization of genetic information. Each domain would define an independent unit of gene activity, insulated from the regulatory influences of adjacent domains. Critical to this model of chromosome organization and function are the domain boundaries: the special nucleoprotein structures that delimit each higher order domain and segregate the chromosome into units of independent gene activity. In the work reported here we have tested whether two putative domain boundaries, scs and scs', from the Drosophila 87A7 heat shock locus can establish a domain of independent gene activity in vivo and insulate against chromosomal position effects.     

Roles of DNA looping in enhancer-blocking activity

Enhancer-promoter interactions in eukaryotic genomes are often controlled by sequence elements that block the actions of enhancers. Although the experimental evidence suggests that those sequence elements contribute to forming loops of chromatin, the molecular mechanism of how such looping affects the enhancer-blocking activity is still largely unknown. In this article, the roles of DNA looping in enhancer blocking are investigated by numerically simulating the DNA conformation of a prototypical model system of gene regulation. The simulated results show that the enhancer function is indeed blocked when the enhancer is looped out so that it is separated from the promoter, which explains experimental observations of gene expression in the model system. The local structural distortion of DNA caused by looping is important for blocking, so the ability of looping to block enhancers can be lost when the loop length is much larger than the persistence length of the chain.     

Chromatin domain boundary element search tool for Drosophila

Chromatin domain boundary elements prevent inappropriate interaction between distant or closely spaced regulatory elements and restrict enhancers and silencers to correct target promoters. In spite of having such a general role and expected frequent occurrence genome wide, there is no DNA sequence analysis based tool to identify boundary elements. Here, we report chromatin domain Boundary Element Search Tool (cdBEST), to identify boundary elements. cdBEST uses known recognition sequences of boundary interacting proteins and looks for 'motif clusters'. Using cdBEST, we identified boundary sequences across 12 Drosophila species. Of the 4576 boundary sequences identified in Drosophila melanogaster genome, >170 sequences are repetitive in nature and have sequence homology to transposable elements. Analysis of such sequences across 12 Drosophila genomes showed that the occurrence of repetitive sequences in the context of boundaries is a common feature of drosophilids. We use a variety of genome organization criteria and also experimental test on a subset of the cdBEST boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay and show that 80% of them indeed function as boundaries in vivo. These observations highlight the role of cdBEST in better understanding of chromatin domain boundaries in Drosophila and setting the stage for comparative analysis of boundaries across closely related species.     

An Organizational Hub of Developmentally Regulated Chromatin Loops in the Drosophila Antennapedia Complex

Chromatin boundary elements (CBEs) are widely distributed in the genome and mediate formation of chromatin loops, but their roles in gene regulation remain poorly understood. The complex expression pattern of the Drosophila homeotic gene Sex combs reduced (Scr) is directed by an unusually long regulatory sequence harboring diverse cis elements and an intervening neighbor gene fushi tarazu (ftz). Here we report the presence of a multitude of CBEs in the Scr regulatory region. Selective and dynamic pairing among these CBEs mediates developmentally regulated chromatin loops. In particular, the SF1 boundary plays a central role in organizing two subsets of chromatin loops: one subset encloses ftz, limiting its access by the surrounding Scr enhancers and compartmentalizing distinct histone modifications, and the other subset subdivides the Scr regulatory sequences into independent enhancer access domains. We show that these CBEs exhibit diverse enhancer-blocking activities that vary in strength and tissue distribution. Tandem pairing of SF1 and SF2, two strong CBEs that flank the ftz domain, allows the distal enhancers to bypass their block in transgenic Drosophila, providing a mechanism for the endogenous Scr enhancer to circumvent the ftz domain. Our study demonstrates how an endogenous CBE network, centrally orchestrated by SF1, could remodel the genomic environment to facilitate gene regulation during development.     

Characterization of new regulatory elements within the Drosophila bithorax complex

The homeotic Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene expression depends on a modular cis-regulatory region divided into discrete functional domains (iab) that control the expression of the gene in a particular segment of the fly. These domains contain regulatory elements implicated in both initiation and maintenance of homeotic gene expression and elements that separate the different domains. In this paper we have performed an extensive analysis of the iab-6 regulatory region, which regulates Abd-B expression at abdominal segment A6 (PS11), and we have characterized two new polycomb response elements (PREs) within this domain. We report that PREs at Abd-B cis-regulatory domains present a particular chromatin structure which is nuclease accessible all along Drosophila development and both in active and repressed states. We also show that one of these regions contains a dCTCF and CP190 dependent activity in transgenic enhancer-blocking assays, suggesting that it corresponds to the Fab-6 boundary element of the Drosophila bithorax complex.     

The 5' boundary of the human apolipoprotein B chromatin domain in intestinal cells

The 5' boundary of the chromosomal domain of the human apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene in intestinal cells has been localized and characterized. It is composed of two kinds of boundary elements; the first, functional boundary is an insulator activity exhibited by a 1.8 kb DNA fragment located between -58 and -56 kb upstream of the human apoB promoter. In this region, an enhancer-blocking activity has been mapped to a CTCF binding site that is located upstream of two apoB intestinal enhancers (IEs), the 315 IE and the 485 IE. The CTCF site represents a boundary between two types of chromatin structure: an open, DNaseI-sensitive region 3' of the CTCF site containing the intestinal regulatory elements and a closed, DNaseI-resistant region 5' of the CTCF site. The 1.8 kb fragment harboring the CTCF site also insulated mini-white transgenes against position effects in Drosophila melanogaster. The second, structural boundary is represented by a nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR), situated about 3 kb 5' of the CTCF site. This MAR may represent the 5' anchorage site for a chromosomal loop that functions to bring the intestinal regulatory elements closer to the apoB promoter.     

Linker scanner mutagenesis of the Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene promoter.

We have assayed a series of linker scanner mutants which cover the Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene promoter at approximately ten base pair intervals. All of these mutations adversely affect promoter activity with the exception of one mutation which stimulates activity. Thus, none are neutral. We show that most of the mutations can be partially rescued by ligating a block of enhancer elements upstream of the promoter. In addition, we have made extracts from liver nuclei which produce DNaseI protection footprints over the promoter. Analysis of both strands reveals a prominent footprinting domain from about -5 to -30. However, lesser changes in the digestion pattern are detected over most of the promoter. Previously published analyses have suggested that this promoter might be composed of three functional domains. The experiments presented here suggest that either 1) the three putative domains are so closely arranged that the boundaries are difficult to discern, or 2) the situation is more complex.