Are fusion peptides a good model to study viral cell fusion?

Fusion peptides are hydrophobic and conserved sequences located within glycoprotein ectodomains that protrude from the virion surface. Direct participation of fusion peptides in the viral membrane fusion phenomenon has been inferred from genetic analyses showing that even a single residue substitution or a deletion within these sequences may completely block the process. However, the specific fusion peptide activities associated to the multi-step fusion mechanism are not well defined. Based on the assumption that fusion peptides are transferred into target membranes, biophysical methodologies have been applied to study integration into model membranes of synthetic fragments representing functional and non-functional sequences. From these studies, it is inferred that, following insertion, functional sequences generate target membrane perturbations and adopt specific structural arrangements within. Further characterization of these artificial systems may help in understanding the molecular processes that bring initial bilayer destabilizations to the eventual opening of a fusion pore.     

Is NSF a fusion protein?

N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) is an ATPase required for vesicular transport throughout the constitutive secretory and endocytic pathways. Recently, NSF has also been implicated in regulated exocytosis in synapses--based on SNAP-mediated binding in vitro to a complex of neurotoxin substrates (termed 'SNAREs'). This work has generated an hypothesis in which the interaction of SNAREs (SNAP receptors) on the vesicle membrane with those on the target membrane forms a docking complex to which SNAPs bind, thus allowing NSF to bind and elicit membrane fusion. However, current evidence supports an earlier, pre-fusion role for NSF. We speculate that this role may be as a molecular chaperone for the membrane docking/fusion machinery.     

Fungal protoplast fusion – a revisit

Protoplast fusion is a non-specific recombination technique used for transfer of cytosolic organelles including genetic material. The process involves cell wall breakdown, regeneration of protoplasts, chemofusion and electrofusion. This review article discusses all the stages involved in fusion of protoplasts and some of the applications of protoplast fusion technique in fungal systems.     

What drives membrane fusion in eukaryotes?

The fusion of biological membranes is the terminal step of all vesicular trafficking reactions in eukaryotic cells. Therefore, this fusion is fundamental for the transfer of proteins and lipids between different compartments, for exocytosis and for the structural integrity of organelles. In the past decade, many parts of the molecular machinery involved in fusion have been uncovered. Although the mechanisms responsible for mutual recognition and binding of membranes inside eukaryotes are becoming reasonably well known, there is considerable uncertainty as to what causes the actual merging of the lipid bilayer. Two classes of mechanisms have been proposed. Proximity models postulate that very close apposition of membranes suffices to induce fusion. By contrast, pore models propose that continuous proteinaceous pores between apposed membranes could be the basis for fusion.     

Intracellular membrane fusion: SNAREs only?

The past two years have seen vigorous attempts to elucidate the mechanism driving intracellular membrane fusion. Much attention was focused on the role of SNARE complexes. Their crystal structure was solved and fusion was reconstituted using proteoliposomes with purified SNAREs suggesting them to be the minimal machinery for fusion. Work on physiological membranes, however, points in another direction and has spurred a hot debate on the function of SNAREs.     

Neurotransmitter release: fusion or 'kiss-and-run'?

The clear synaptic vesicles of neurons release their contents at the presynaptic membrane and are then quickly retrieved. However, it is unclear whether a complete cycle of exocytosis and endocytosis is always involved or whether neurotransmitter can be released by a transient interaction. Recent findings in chromaffin and mast cells suggest that exocytosis is preceded by the formation of a pore that has similar conductance properties to ion channels. The content of the secretory organelle partially escapes at this early step, but the pore can close before the vesicle fuses fully. This article looks at the evidence that quantal release of neurotransmitter from clear synaptic vesicles may occur by a similar 'kiss-and-run' mechanism.     

Impaired mitophagosome–lysosome fusion mediates olanzapine-induced aging

The lifespan of schizophrenia patients is significantly shorter than the general population. Olanzapine is one of the most commonly used antipsychotic drugs (APDs) for treating patients with psychosis, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Despite their effectiveness in treating positive and negative symptoms, prolonged exposure to APDs may lead to accelerated aging and cognitive decline, among other side effects. Here we report that dysfunctional mitophagy is a fundamental mechanism underlying accelerated aging induced by olanzapine, using in vitro and in vivo (Caenorhabditis elegans) models. We showed that the aberrant mitophagy caused by olanzapine was via blocking mitophagosome–lysosome fusion. Furthermore, olanzapine can induce mitochondrial damage and hyperfragmentation of the mitochondrial network. The mitophagosome–lysosome fusion in olanzapine-induced aging models can be restored by a mitophagy inducer, urolithin A, which alleviates defective mitophagy, mitochondrial damage, and fragmentation of the mitochondrial network. Moreover, the mitophagy inducer ameliorated behavioral changes induced by olanzapine, including shortened lifespan, and impaired health span, learning, and memory. These data indicate that olanzapine impairs mitophagy, leading to the shortened lifespan, impaired health span, and cognitive deficits. Furthermore, this study suggests the potential application of mitophagy inducers as therapeutic strategies to reverse APD-induced adverse effects associated with accelerated aging.     

Oligomerization and toxicity of Aβ fusion proteins

This study has found that the Maltose binding protein Aβ42 fusion protein (MBP-Aβ42) forms soluble oligomers while the shorter MBP-Aβ16 fusion and control MBP did not. MBP-Aβ42, but neither MBP-Aβ16 nor control MBP, was toxic in a dose-dependent manner in both yeast and primary cortical neuronal cells. This study demonstrates the potential utility of MBP-Aβ42 as a reagent for drug screening assays in yeast and neuronal cell cultures and as a candidate for further Aβ42 characterization.     

Are osmotic forces involved in influenza virus-cell fusion?

The kinetics of the fusion process of unsealed and resealed erthyrocyte ghosts with influenza virus (A/PR8/34, A/Chile 1/83), were measured under hypotonic, isotonic and hypertonic conditions using a recently developed fluorescence assay (Hoekstraet al. (1984)Biochemistry 23:5675–5681]. No correlation between the external osmotic pressure and kinetics and extent of fusion was observed. Influenza viruses fuse as effectively with unsealed ghosts as with resealed ghosts. It is concluded that osmotic forces as well as osmotic swelling of cells are not necessary for virus-cell membrane fusion.     

Tracing neurons with a kinesin-β-galactosidase fusion protein

Summary We have analyzed the development of neuronal projections inDrosophila by fusing the gene encodingDrosophila kinesin, a microtubule-associated motor protein, toEscherichia coli lacZ, and employing the resulting chimeric protein as a reporter molecule for labelling cells by the enhancer-trap method. Expression of kinesin--galactosidase in neurons has afforded a detailed view of the morphologies and projections of neurons. The images of cells provided by this method will facilitate anatomical and genetic investigations of theDrosophila nervous system as well as other cell types. Correspondence to: Y.N. Jan     

Is lysosomal fusion required for the granulocyte chemiluminescence reaction?

When phagocytic leukocytes interact with soluble or particulate stimuli, the cells increase their production of oxidative metabolites. This increased production can be measured as luminol amplified light emission or chemiluminescence. From the literature it can be concluded that the chemiluminescence reaction is dependent on oxygen radicals produced by the cells and on the enzyme myeloperoxidase. Since the radical producing system and the peroxidase are localized to different subcellular compartments, it is proposed that a lysosomal fusion, bringing the two reactants together into the same subcellular compartment, is a prerequisite for the chemiluminescence reaction.     

Calcium: a fundamental regulator of intracellular membrane fusion?

For many years, it has been known that an increase in cytosolic calcium triggers the fusion of secretory granules and synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane. However, the role of calcium in the intracellular membrane-fusion reactions that coordinate the secretory and endocytic pathways has been less clear. Initially, there was accumulating evidence to indicate that a focally localized and transient calcium signal is required to trigger even those fusion events formerly classified as 'constitutive'-that is, those that normally occur in the absence of global cytosolic calcium increases. Therefore, calcium seemed to be a required fundamental co-factor underlying all biological membrane-fusion steps, perhaps with a conserved mechanism of action. However, although such unification would be gratifying, new data indicate that several intracellular fusion events do not require calcium after all. In this review, the evidence for calcium requirements and its modes of action in constitutive trafficking are discussed. As a challenging perspective, I suggest that the specific absence of calcium requirements for some transport steps in fact expands the function of calcium in trafficking, because divergent luminal calcium concentrations and requirements for fusion might increase the specificity with which intracellular membrane-fusion partners are determined.     

How can proteolipids be central players in membrane fusion?

Proton transport ATPases have been celebrated as rotating motors that energize membranes. Now studies of membrane fusion in yeast suggest that the hydrophobic subunits of the vacuolar ATPase participate in formation of fusion pores. This work confirms previous studies showing that membrane approximation by alpha-helical protein bundles is inadequate for complete intracellular fusion and reopens a debate over whether the core of the central intermediate of membrane fusion is lipidic or proteinaceous.     

A genetic model with specifically impaired autophagosome–lysosome fusion

Yeast studies identified the evolutionarily conserved core ATG genes responsible for autophagosome formation. However, the SNARE-dependent machinery involved in autophagosome fusion with the vacuole in yeast is not conserved. We recently reported that the SNARE complex consisting of Syx17 (Syntaxin 17), ubisnap (SNAP-29) and Vamp7 is required for the fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes and lysosomes in Drosophila. Syx17 mutant flies are viable but exhibit neuronal dysfunction, locomotion defects and premature death. These data point to the critical role of autophagosome clearance in organismal homeodynamics.     

“Arabidobrassica”: A novel plant obtained by protoplast fusion

Using somatic hybrid cell lines Arabidopsis thaliana+Brassica campestris, obtained by cloning individual protoplast-fusion products as starting material, shoots and flowering plants have been regenerated. Cytological, biochemical, and morphological analyses indicate that genetic material of both species is present in the resultant plants. Shoots and plants obtained from different lines and different regeneration events differed morphologically and genetically. Most regenerants show morphological abnormalities and unusual organizational patterns. Flowering forms have so far been sterile. Asymmetric hybrids (i.e., hybrids bearing most genetic material of one of the parent species and only few chromosomes of the other) were more regular in morphology. The results represent the first case of intergeneric-intertribal hybridization of flowering plants.Dedicated to the memory of G.D. Karpechenko, author of the theory of remote hybridization and creator of Raphanobrassica hybrid (1928)     

rDNA-directed integration by an HIV-1 integrase—I-PpoI fusion protein

Integrating viral vectors are efficient gene transfer tools, but their integration patterns have been associated with genotoxicity and oncogenicity. The recent development of highly specific designer nucleases has enabled target DNA modification and site-specific gene insertion at desired genomic loci. However, a lack of consensus exists regarding a perfect genomic safe harbour (GSH) that would allow transgenes to be stably and reliably expressed without adversely affecting endogenous gene structure and function. Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has many advantages as a GSH, but efficient means to target integration to this locus are currently lacking. We tested whether lentivirus vector integration can be directed to rDNA by using fusion proteins consisting of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) integrase (IN) and the homing endonuclease I-PpoI, which has natural cleavage sites in the rDNA. A point mutation (N119A) was introduced into I-PpoI to abolish unwanted DNA cleavage by the endonuclease. The vector-incorporated IN-I-PpoI_N119A fusion protein targeted integration into rDNA significantly more than unmodified lentivirus vectors, with an efficiency of 2.7%. Our findings show that IN-fusion proteins can be used to modify the integration pattern of lentivirus vectors, and to package site-specific DNA-recognizing proteins into vectors to obtain safer transgene integration.     

What is the role of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion?

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins have been at the fore-front of research on biological membrane fusion for some time. The subcellular localization of SNAREs and their ability to form the so-called SNARE complex may be integral to determining the specificity of intracellular fusion (the SNARE hypothesis) and/or serving as the minimal fusion machinery. Both the SNARE hypothesis and the idea of the minimal fusion machinery have been challenged by a number of experimental observations in various model systems, suggesting that SNAREs may have other functions. Considering recent advances in the SNARE literature, it appears that SNAREs may actually function as part of a complex fusion "machine." Their role in the machinery could be any one or a combination of roles, including establishing tight membrane contact, formation of a scaffolding on which to build the machine, binding of lipid surfaces, and many others. It is also possible that complexations other than the classic SNARE complex participate in membrane fusion.