Localization of pan-cadherin immunoreactivity in adult rat tissues

Cadherins, being responsible for selective cell recognition and normal tissue integrity in adults, regulate morphogenesis in a variety of organs during development. In this study, anti-rat pan-cadherin antibody, specific to all subgroups of the cadherin family, was used to map the distribution of the pan-cadherin immunoreactivity in adult rat organs. Pan-cadherin immunoreactivity positive tissues were: secretory cells of the adenohypophysis, autonomic nerve, corneal epithelium, oesophageal nerve plexus, stomach and pyloric glandular cells, epithelium of the ileum and its nerve plexus, alveolar cells of the lung, proximal convoluted tubules of the kidney, islet cells of Langerhans, and the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas. For the first time, positive pan-cadherin immunoreactivity was demonstrated in the epithelial cells of the corpus ciliaris and in the nerve plexus of corpus cavernosum of the penis. In conclusion, our results suggest that cells in many tissues and organs of the adult rat synthesize cadherins.     

ARVCF catenin controls force production during vertebrate convergent extension

1. Download : Download high-res image (206KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Historical review of the discovery of cadherin,in memory of Tokindo Okada

The cadherin family of cell–cell adhesion molecules plays a pivotal role in animal tissue formation. Discovery of this molecular family can be traced back to some unexpected observations of strange cell behavior that were made around 1970 in the Kyoto University laboratory of Tokindo Okada, and then in the Department of Embryology at the Carnegie Institution of Washington (currently the Carnegie Institution for Science). This article looks back on these discoveries, and recalls how these observations led to the identification of important cell‐cell adhesion molecules known as cadherins.     

The path leading to the discovery of cadherin: In retrospect

Problems of adhesion between cells are undoubtedly one of the key major issues in developmental biology and its related field. It is little doubt that cell adhesion is one of the most fundamental mechanisms underlying the morphogenesis in multicellular animals and that it is intrinsically related to the metastasis of cancer cells as well. The historical source of adhesion studies can be traced to Wilson's work using sponges published in 1907. The present article starts to outline briefly the conceptual history up to a rise of cell adhesion in the 1950s as a problem for understanding morphogenesis in general. A crucial landmark to a recent burst of the interest to adhesion mechanisms in terms of adhesion molecules is the discovery of a group of major molecules functioning cell-to-cell adhesion, cadherins, from a research group at Kyoto University, Japan, which was initiated by myself and very successfully continued by Takeichi. A main part of the present review is to record the path leading to this important discovery based on my own personal experience, including some retrospective anecdotes. The path was initiated with a series of very simple experiments of a naïve question; that is, to examine whether or not different divalent cations were required for cell adhesion in qualitatively different manners.     

Cadherin tales: Regulation of cadherin function by endocytic membrane trafficking

Cadherins are the primary adhesion molecules in adherens junctions and desmosomes and play essential roles in embryonic development. Although significant progress has been made in understanding cadherin structure and function, we lack a clear vision of how cells confer plasticity upon adhesive junctions to allow for cellular rearrangements during development, wound healing and metastasis. Endocytic membrane trafficking has emerged as a fundamental mechanism by which cells confer a dynamic state to adhesive junctions. Recent studies indicate that the juxtamembrane domain of classical cadherins contains multiple endocytic motifs, or “switches,” that can be used by cellular membrane trafficking machinery to regulate adhesion. The cadherin‐binding protein p120‐catenin (p120) appears to be the master regulator of access to these switches, thereby controlling cadherin endocytosis and turnover. This review focuses on p120 and other cadherin‐binding proteins, ubiquitin ligases, and growth factors as key modulators of cadherin membrane trafficking.      

Correlation between expression of cadherin and gap junctional communication in human lung carcinoma cells

ＣａｄｈｅｒｉｎｓａｒｅｍｅｍｂｒａｎｏｕｓＣａ2+ｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔ,ｈｏｍｏｐｈｉｌｉｃ,ａｄｈｅｓｉｏｎｍｏｌｅｃｕｌｅｓｔｈａｔａｒｅａｓｓｕｍｅｄｔｏｐｌａｙｅｓｓｅｎｔｉａｌｒｏｌｅｓｉｎｃｅｌｌｒｅｃｏｇｎｉｔｉｏｎ,ｃｅｌｌｓｏｒｔｉｎｇ,ｅｍｂｒｙｏｎｉｃｍｏｒｐｈｏｇｅｎｅｓｉｓａｎｄｓｉｇｎａｌｔｒａｎｓｄｕｃｔｉｏｎ[1,2].ＴｈｅｓｅｔｒａｎｓｍｅｍｂｒａｎｅｍｏｌｅｃｕｌｅｓｆｏｒｍａｐｌａｑｕｅｔｈｒｏｕｇｈｉｔｓｃｙｔｏｐｌａｓｍｉｃｄｏｍａｉｎａｔＣｔａｉｌｗｉｔｈｔｈｅ…     

Exogenous cadherin microdisplay can interfere with endogenous signaling and reprogram gene expression in cultured hepatocytes

We recently found that the basal micro substrate presentation of E-cadherin, a key cell-cell adhesion molecule in the liver, can modulate hepatocellular proliferative potential and differentiated function (Brieva and Moghe, in press). In the current study, we established a similar experimental model involving rat hepatocytes cultured on collagen and incorporated 5 microm polystyrene microbeads functionalized with Protein A-anchored E-cadherin/human lgG Fc chimeric fusion constructs. We investigated the cadherin governed dose-response of cell proliferative potential and quantified the underlying changes in intracellular gene signaling processes. Hepatocellular proliferative potential was found to be intensified with an increase in the microdisplay of acellular cadherins and this effect was offset by increased cell seeding density. Notably, we report that following overnight exposure to acellular cadherins, the expression of genes known to mediate the control of cell proliferation, cyclin D1 and c-myc, was upregulated, while the expression of differentiation-related genes, namely albumin and cytochrome p450 II B1, was reduced. The exposure of cell cultures to exogenous cadherins was found to markedly disrupt the localization of endogenous E-cadherin and beta-catenin to junctions at cell-cell contacts and cause a quantitative decrease in the endogenous cadherin protein levels. Based on all of our observations, we propose that the acellular presentation of E-cadherin chimeras competitively disrupts endogenous cadherin containing complexes at cell-cell junctions and increases intracellular cadherin turnover, thereby promoting beta-catenin mediated signaling, which ultimately engenders an increase in cell proliferative potential and a decrease in differentiated function.     

Altered expression of the catenin p120 in human cancer: implications for tumor progression

Tumor progression in epithelial tissues is characterized by a series of genetic and epigenetic changes that lead ultimately to metastasis. Alterations in E-cadherin and its cytoplasmic regulators, the catenins, have been implicated as central to this process. Here, we focus on p120-catenin and its rising incidence in the pathology literature as a molecule altered in human tumors. The data show that p120 is frequently altered and/or lost in tumors of the colon, bladder, stomach, breast, prostate, lung, and pancreas. Moreover, in some cases p120 loss appears to be an early event in tumor progression, possibly preceding loss of E-cadherin. Potential roles of p120 as a tumor suppressor or metastasis promoter are discussed.     

E‐cadherin can limit the transforming properties of activating β‐catenin mutations

Wnt pathway deregulation is a common characteristic of many cancers. Only colorectal cancer predominantly harbours mutations in APC, whereas other cancer types (hepatocellular carcinoma, solid pseudopapillary tumours of the pancreas) have activating mutations in β‐catenin (CTNNB1). We have compared the dynamics and the potency of β‐catenin mutations in vivo. Within the murine small intestine (SI), an activating mutation of β‐catenin took much longer to achieve Wnt deregulation and acquire a crypt‐progenitor cell (CPC) phenotype than Apc or Gsk3 loss. Within the colon, a single activating mutation of β‐catenin was unable to drive Wnt deregulation or induce the CPC phenotype. This ability of β‐catenin mutation to differentially transform the SI versus the colon correlated with higher expression of E‐cadherin and a higher number of E‐cadherin:β‐catenin complexes at the membrane. Reduction in E‐cadherin synergised with an activating mutation of β‐catenin resulting in a rapid CPC phenotype within the SI and colon. Thus, there is a threshold of β‐catenin that is required to drive transformation, and E‐cadherin can act as a buffer to sequester mutated β‐catenin.     

The Membrane-proximal Region of the E-Cadherin Cytoplasmic Domain Prevents Dimerization and Negatively Regulates Adhesion Activity

Cadherins are transmembrane glycoproteins involved in Ca²⁺-dependent cell–cell adhesion. Deletion of the COOH-terminal residues of the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain has been shown to abolish its cell adhesive activity, which has been ascribed to the failure of the deletion mutants to associate with catenins. Based on our present results, this concept needs revision. As was reported previously, leukemia cells (K562) expressing E-cadherin with COOH-terminal deletion of 37 or 71 amino acid residues showed almost no aggregation. Cells expressing E-cadherin with further deletion of 144 or 151 amino acid residues, which eliminates the membrane-proximal region of the cytoplasmic domain, showed E-cadherin–dependent aggregation. Thus, deletion of the membrane-proximal region results in activation of the nonfunctional E-cadherin polypeptides. However, these cells did not show compaction. Chemical cross-linking revealed that the activated E-cadherin polypeptides can be cross-linked to a dimer on the surface of cells, whereas the inactive polypeptides, as well as the wild-type E-cadherin polypeptide containing the membrane-proximal region, can not. Therefore, the membrane-proximal region participates in regulation of the adhesive activity by preventing lateral dimerization of the extracellular domain.     

μ2‐Dependent endocytosis of N‐cadherin is regulated by β‐catenin to facilitate neurite outgrowth

Circuit formation in the brain requires neurite outgrowth throughout development to establish synaptic contacts with target cells. Active endocytosis of several adhesion molecules facilitates the dynamic exchange of these molecules at the surface and promotes neurite outgrowth in developing neurons. The endocytosis of N‐cadherin, a calcium‐dependent adhesion molecule, has been implicated in the regulation of neurite outgrowth, but the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we identified that a fraction of N‐cadherin internalizes through clathrin‐mediated endocytosis (CME). Two tyrosine‐based motifs in the cytoplasmic domain of N‐cadherin recognized by the μ2 subunit of the AP‐2 adaptor complex are responsible for CME of N‐cadherin. Moreover, β‐catenin, a core component of the N‐cadherin adhesion complex, inhibits N‐cadherin endocytosis by masking the 2 tyrosine‐based motifs. Removal of β‐catenin facilitates μ2 binding to N‐cadherin, thereby increasing clathrin‐mediated N‐cadherin endocytosis and neurite outgrowth without affecting the steady‐state level of surface N‐cadherin. These results identify and characterize the mechanism controlling N‐cadherin endocytosis through β‐catenin‐regulated μ2 binding to modulate neurite outgrowth.      

A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase

Centrosomes nucleate microtubules and contribute to mitotic spindle organization and function. They also participate in cytokinesis and cell cycle progression in ways that are poorly understood. Here we describe a novel human protein called centriolin that localizes to the maternal centriole and functions in both cytokinesis and cell cycle progression. Centriolin silencing induces cytokinesis failure by a novel mechanism whereby cells remain interconnected by long intercellular bridges. Most cells continue to cycle, reenter mitosis, and form multicellular syncytia. Some ultimately divide or undergo apoptosis specifically during the protracted period of cytokinesis. At later times, viable cells arrest in G1/G0. The cytokinesis activity is localized to a centriolin domain that shares homology with Nud1p and Cdc11p, budding and fission yeast proteins that anchor regulatory pathways involved in progression through the late stages of mitosis. The Nud1p-like domain of centriolin binds Bub2p, another component of the budding yeast pathway. We conclude that centriolin is required for a late stage of vertebrate cytokinesis, perhaps the final cell cleavage event, and plays a role in progression into S phase.     

The sequence determinants of cadherin molecules

The sequence and structural analysis of cadherins allow us to find sequence determinants-a few positions in sequences whose residues are characteristic and specific for the structures of a given family. Comparison of the five extracellular domains of classic cadherins showed that they share the same sequence determinants despite only a nonsignificant sequence similarity between the N-terminal domain and other extracellular domains. This allowed us to predict secondary structures and propose three-dimensional structures for these domains that have not been structurally analyzed previously. A new method of assigning a sequence to its proper protein family is suggested: analysis of sequence determinants. The main advantage of this method is that it is not necessary to know all or almost all residues in a sequence as required for other traditional classification tools such as BLAST, FASTA, and HMM. Using the key positions only, that is, residues that serve as the sequence determinants, we found that all members of the classic cadherin family were unequivocally selected from among 80,000 examined proteins. In addition, we proposed a model for the secondary structure of the cytoplasmic domain of cadherins based on the principal relations between sequences and secondary structure multialignments. The patterns of the secondary structure of this domain can serve as the distinguishing characteristics of cadherins.     

Distribution of the cadherin-catenin complex in normal human thyroid epithelium and a thyroid carcinoma cell line

E-cadherin is the major cell-cell adhesion molecule expressed by epithelial cells. Cadherins form a complex with three cytoplasmic proteins, α-, β-, and γ-catenin, and the interaction between them is crucial for anchoring the actin cytoskeleton to the intercellular adherens junctions. The invasive behavior of cancer cells has been attributed to a dysfunction of these molecules. In this study, we examined the distribution of the cadherin-catenin complex in a Chinese human thyroid cancer cell line, CGTH W-2, compared with that in normal human thyroid epithelial cells. In the normal cells, using immunofluorescence staining, E-cadherin and α-, β-, and γ-catenin were found to be localized at the intercellular junction and appeared as 135, 102, 90, and 80 kD proteins on Western blots. In CGTH W-2 cells, no E-cadherin and γ-catenin immunoreactivity was detected by immunofluorescence or Western blotting; α- and β-catenin were detected as 102 and 90 kD proteins on blots but gave a diffuse cytoplasmic immunofluorescence staining pattern in most cells, while β-catenin was also distributed throughout the cytoplasm in most cells but was found at the cell junction in some, where it colocalized with α-actinin. The present data indicate that the loss of cell adhesiveness in these cancer cells may be due to incomplete assembly of the cadherin-catenin complex at the cell junction. However, this defect did not affect the linkage of actin bundles to vinculin-enriched intercellular junctions. J. Cell. Biochem. 70:330–337, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Regulation of cadherin expression in nervous system development

This review addresses our current understanding of the regulatory mechanisms for classical cadherin expression during development of the vertebrate nervous system. The complexity of the spatial and temporal expression patterns is linked to morphogenic and functional roles in the developing nervous system. While the regulatory networks controlling cadherin expression are not well understood, it is likely that the multiple signaling pathways active in the development of particular domains also regulate the specific cadherins expressed at that time and location. With the growing understanding of the broader roles of cadherins in cell–cell adhesion and non-adhesion processes, it is important to understand both the upstream regulation of cadherin expression and the downstream effects of specific cadherins within their cellular context.