共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Kuo-Liang Su Ya-Fan Liao Hui-Chih Hung Guang-Yaw Liu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(39):26768-26777
Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is the first enzyme involved in polyamine biosynthesis, and it catalyzes the decarboxylation of ornithine to putrescine. ODC is a dimeric enzyme, whereas antizyme inhibitor (AZI), a positive regulator of ODC that is homologous to ODC, exists predominantly as a monomer and lacks decarboxylase activity. The goal of this paper was to identify the essential amino acid residues that determine the dimerization of AZI. The nonconserved amino acid residues in the putative dimer interface of AZI (Ser-277, Ser-331, Glu-332, and Asp-389) were substituted with the corresponding residues in the putative dimer interface of ODC (Arg-277, Tyr-331, Asp-332, and Tyr-389, respectively). Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis was used to determine the size distribution of these AZI mutants. The size-distribution analysis data suggest that residue 331 may play a major role in the dimerization of AZI. Mutating Ser-331 to Tyr in AZI (AZI-S331Y) caused a shift from a monomer configuration to a dimer. Furthermore, in comparison with the single mutant AZI-S331Y, the AZI-S331Y/D389Y double mutant displayed a further reduction in the monomer-dimer Kd, suggesting that residue 389 is also crucial for AZI dimerization. Analysis of the triple mutant AZI-S331Y/D389Y/S277R showed that it formed a stable dimer (Kd value = 1.3 μm). Finally, a quadruple mutant, S331Y/D389Y/S277R/E332D, behaved as a dimer with a Kd value of ∼0.1 μm, which is very close to that of the human ODC enzyme. The quadruple mutant, although forming a dimer, could still be disrupted by antizyme (AZ), further forming a heterodimer, and it could rescue the AZ-inhibited ODC activity, suggesting that the AZ-binding ability of the AZI dimer was retained.Polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine) have been shown to have both structural and regulatory roles in protein and nucleic acid biosynthesis and function (1–3). Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC,3 EC 4.1.1.17) is a central regulator of cellular polyamine synthesis (reviewed in Refs. 1, 4, 5). This enzyme catalyzes the pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP)-dependent decarboxylation of ornithine to putrescine, and it is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis (2, 3, 6, 7). ODC and polyamines play important roles in a number of biological functions, including embryonic development, cell cycle, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (8–15). They also have been associated with human diseases and a variety of cancers (16–26). Because the regulation of ODC and polyamine content is critical to cell proliferation (11), as well as in the origin and progression of neoplastic diseases (23, 24), ODC has been identified as an oncogenic enzyme, and the inhibitors of ODC and the polyamine pathway are important targets for therapeutic intervention in many cancers (6, 11).ODC is ubiquitously found in organisms ranging from bacteria to humans. It contains 461 amino acid residues in each monomer and is a 106-kDa homodimer with molecular 2-fold symmetry (27, 28). Importantly, ODC activity requires the formation of a dimer (29–31). X-ray structures of the ODC enzyme reveal that this dimer contains two active sites, both of which are formed at the interface between the N-terminal domain of one monomer, which provides residues involved in PLP interactions, and the C-terminal domain of the other subunit, which provides the residues that interact with substrate (27, 32–41).ODC undergoes a unique ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation via a direct interaction with the regulatory protein antizyme (AZ). Binding of AZ promotes the dissociation of the ODC homodimers and targets ODC for degradation by the 26 S proteasome (42–46). Current models of antizyme function indicate that increased polyamine levels promote the fidelity of the AZ mRNA translational frameshift, leading to increased concentrations of AZ (47). The AZ monomer selectively binds to dimeric ODC, thereby inactivating ODC by forming inactive AZ-ODC heterodimers (44, 48–50). AZ acts as a regulator of polyamine metabolism that inhibits ODC activity and polyamine transport, thus restricting polyamine levels (4, 5, 51, 52). When antizymes are overexpressed, they inhibit ODC and promote ubiquitin-independent proteolytic degradation of ODC. Because elevated ODC activity is associated with most forms of human malignancies (1), it has been suggested that antizymes may function as tumor suppressors.In contrast to the extensive studies on the oncogene ODC, the endogenous antizyme inhibitor (AZI) is less well understood. AZI is homologous to the enzyme ODC. It is a 448-amino acid protein with a molecular mass of 50 kDa. However, despite the homology between these proteins, AZI does not possess any decarboxylase activity. It binds to antizyme more tightly than does ODC and releases ODC from the ODC-antizyme complex (53, 54). Both the AZI and AZ proteins display rapid ubiquitin-dependent turnover within a few minutes to 1 h in vivo (5). However, AZ binding actually stabilizes AZI by inhibiting its ubiquitination (55).AZI, which inactivates all members of the AZ family (53, 56), restores ODC activity (54), and prevents the proteolytic degradation of ODC, may play a role in tumor progression. It has been reported that down-regulation of AZI is associated with the inhibition of cell proliferation and reduced ODC activity, presumably through the modulation of AZ function (57). Moreover, overexpression of AZI has been shown to increase cell proliferation and promote cell transformation (58–60). Furthermore, AZI is capable of direct interaction with cyclin D1, preventing its degradation, and this effect is at least partially independent of AZ function (60, 61). These results demonstrate a role for AZI in the positive regulation of cell proliferation and tumorigenesis.It is now known that ODC exists as a dimer and that AZI may exist as a monomer physiologically (62). Fig. 1 shows the dimeric structures of ODC (Fig. 1A) and AZI (Fig. 1B). Although structural studies indicate that both ODC and AZI crystallize as dimers, the dimeric AZI structure has fewer interactions at the dimer interface, a smaller buried surface area, and a lack of symmetry of the interactions between residues from the two monomers, suggesting that the AZI dimer may be nonphysiological (62). In this study, we identify the critical amino acid residues governing the difference in dimer formation between ODC and AZI. Our preliminary studies using analytical ultracentrifugation indicated that ODC exists as a dimer, whereas AZI exists in a concentration-dependent monomer-dimer equilibrium. Multiple sequence alignments of ODC and AZI from various species have shown that residues 277, 331, 332, and 389 are not conserved between ODC and AZI (Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Crystal structure and the amino acid residues at the dimer interface of human ornithine decarboxylase (hODC) and mouse antizyme inhibitor (mAZI). A, homodimeric structure of human ODC with the cofactor PLP analog, LLP (Protein Data Bank code 1D7K). B, putative dimeric structure of mouse AZI (Protein Data Bank code 3BTN). The amino acid residues in the dimer interface are shown as a ball-and-stick model. The putative AZ-binding site is colored in cyan. This figure was generated using PyMOL (DeLano Scientific LLC, San Carlos, CA).
Open in a separate window 相似文献
TABLE 1
Amino acid residues at the dimer interface of human ODC and AZIHuman ODC | Residue | Human AZI |
---|---|---|
Nonconserved | ||
Arg | 277 | Ser |
Tyr | 331 | Ser |
Asp | 332 | Glu |
Tyr | 389 | Asp |
Conserved | ||
Asp | 134 | Asp |
Lys | 169 | Lys |
Lys | 294 | Lys |
Tyr | 323 | Tyr |
Asp | 364 | Asp |
Gly | 387 | Gly |
Phe | 397 | Phe |
2.
Martijn W. H. Pinkse Dirk T. S. Rijkers Wolfgang R. Dostmann Albert J. R. Heck 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(24):16354-16368
The inhibitor peptide DT-2 (YGRKKRRQRRRPPLRKKKKKH) is the most potent and selective inhibitor of the cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) known today. DT-2 is a construct of a PKG tight binding sequence (W45, LRKKKKKH, KI = 0.8 μm) and a membrane translocating sequence (DT-6, YGRKKRRQRRRPP, KI = 1.1 μm), that combined strongly inhibits PKG catalyzed phosphorylation (KI = 12.5 nm) with ∼1000-fold selectivity toward PKG over protein kinase A, the closest relative of PKG. However, the molecular mechanism behind this inhibition is not entirely understood. Using a combination of photoaffinity labeling, stable isotope labeling, and mass spectrometry, we have located the binding sites of PKG-specific substrate and inhibitor peptides. Covalent linkage of a PKG-specific substrate analogue was localized in the catalytic core on residues 356–372, also known as the glycine-rich loop, essential for ATP binding. By analogy, the individual inhibitor peptides W45 and DT-6 were also found to cross-link near the glycine-rich loop, suggesting these are both substrate competitive inhibitors. A bifunctional photoreactive analogue of DT-2 was found to generate dimers of PKG. This cross-linking induced covalent PKG dimerization was not observed for an N-terminal deletion mutant of PKG, which lacks the dimerization domain. In addition, non-covalent mass spectrometry was used to determine binding stoichiometry and binding order of the inhibitor peptides. Dimeric PKG binds two W45 and DT-6 peptides, whereas only one DT-2 molecule was observed to bind to the dimeric PKG. Taken together, these findings imply that (i) the two individual components making up DT-2 are both targeted against the substrate-binding site and (ii) binding of a single DT-2 molecule inactivates both PKG monomers simultaneously, which is an indication that (iii) in cGMP-activated PKG the catalytic centers of both subunits may be in each other''s proximity.Among the superfamily of protein kinases the two cyclic nucleotide-regulated protein kinases, cAMP-dependent protein kinase and cGMP-dependent protein kinase, form a closely related subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases (1–4). Both proteins share several structural elements, such as the N-terminal dimerization domain, an autoinhibition site, two in-tandem cyclic nucleotide-binding sites, and a highly conserved catalytic core (Fig. 1, A and B). Despite these similarities, these two enzymes display differences, which account for their unique properties. Whereas PKA2 is nearly ubiquitous, PKG is primarily found in the lung, cerebellum, and smooth muscles (5, 6). From a structural point of view these cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases differ as well. The holoenzyme of PKA is a tetramer composed of two regulatory and two catalytic subunits. The catalytic subunits are non-covalently attached to the regulatory subunit dimer. Upon interaction with cAMP, the catalytic subunits dissociate from the holoenzyme and are free to catalyze heterophosphorylation (Fig. 1C). The mammalian type I PKGs are homodimeric cytosolic proteins containing two identical polypeptides of ∼76 kDa. Alternative mRNA splicing produces type Iα and type Iβ PKG, which are identical proteins apart from their first ∼100 N-terminal residues (7). Each PKG subunit is composed of a regulatory and a catalytic domain on a single polypeptide chain. Consequently, when cGMP activates PKG, the catalytic and regulatory components remain physically attached (Fig. 1D). Within the catalytic domain PKA and PKG share a strong primary sequence homology (8). Not surprisingly, these enzymes also exhibit overlapping substrate specificities, a feature that often interferes with efforts to elucidate their distinct biological pathways. Peptide substrates with a primary amino acid sequence motif RRX(S/T)X are in general recognized by both PKA and PKG (9). Besides this strong overlapping substrate specificity, several studies report on subtle differences in determinants that discriminate for PKA and PKG substrate specificity (10–16). To specifically discriminate between PKG and PKA activity in biological assays a highly specific PKG peptide inhibitor was developed (17). This peptide, YGRKKRRQRRRPPLRKKKKKH (DT-2), is the most potent and selective PKG inhibitor known today. Recently, the validity of DT-2 as a superior inhibitor of PKG in terms of potency, selectivity, and membrane permeability has been demonstrated (18–24). The inhibitor is a construct of a substrate competitive sequence, LRKKKKKH (W45), derived from a library screen that selected for tight PKG binding sequences, with a significant specificity toward PKG over PKA, and a membrane translocating signal peptide, YGRKKRRQRRRPP (DT-6). DT-2 strongly inhibits PKG-catalyzed phosphorylation (Ki = 12.5 nm), however, the molecular nature of DT-2 inhibition is not entirely understood (25). Because high resolution structural data are not available for PKG, one of our goals is to elucidate binding sites for PKG-specific substrates and inhibitors in more detail using a combination of mass spectrometric techniques and photoaffinity labeling. To further delineate the nature of inhibition we have developed photoaffinity analogues of DT-2 and related inhibitory peptides, as well as a high affinity peptide substrate. The method of photoaffinity labeling enables the direct probing of target proteins through a covalent bond, which is photochemically introduced between a ligand and its specific receptor (26). In combination with modern mass spectrometric techniques this is a powerful approach for the characterization of peptide-protein interactions (27). Substrate and inhibitor peptides containing photoactivatable analogues of phenylalanine, 4-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine (Phe(Bz)) or 4′-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)-l-phenylalanine (Phe(Tmd)) were synthesized and used to locate their substrate/inhibitor-binding sites on PKG. These measurements indicate that the substrate peptide resides near the glycine-rich loop within the catalytic domain and that the inhibitor peptides are directed similarly toward this substrate-binding site, thereby acting as competitive inhibitors. In addition, nanoflow electrospray ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) was performed to study the interaction between DT-2 and PKG in more detail. ESI-MS has proven to be a useful tool to analyze the non-covalent interaction of proteins with ligands, oligonucleotides, peptides, or other proteins (28–31). Using this technique, important information on conformational changes (32–35), measurement of relative dissociation constants (36, 37), and sequential binding order and cooperativity (38, 39) can be obtained. ESI-MS confirms that PKG is primarily a homodimer and is able to bind four cGMP molecules. Binding of DT-2 was strongly enhanced in the presence of cGMP. Surprising is the observation that only one DT-2 molecule binds to dimeric PKG. The information derived from these measurements allows for molecular modeling and structural refinements of the next generation of PKG-selective inhibitors.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Linear arrangement of the functional domains of the regulatory and catalytic subunit of PKA (A) and PKG (B) type I and schematic representation of the current working models of the activation process of PKA (C) and PKG (D) type 1. Binding of cAMP to the PKA induces a conformational change that results in the dissociation of the catalytic subunits. Binding of cGMP to PKG also induces a conformational change, which exposes the catalytic domains, but both catalytic domains remain near each other via the N-terminal dimerization domain. (Images adapted from Scholten et al. (4).)
Open in a separate window 相似文献
TABLE 1
Inhibition contants (KI) of PKA- or PKG-specific peptide inhibitors and the PKA/PKG specificity indexPeptide | Sequence | PKGKi | PKAKi | Specificity index (PKA/PKG) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
μm | μm | ||||
PKI(5–24) | TTYDFIASGRTGRRNAIHD-NH2 | 150 | 0.003 | 0.0002 | (11) |
WW21 | TQAKRKKALAMA-NH2 | 7.5 | 750 | 100 | (11) |
W45 | LRKKKKKH | 0.82 ± 0.33 | 559 | 680 | (17) |
DT-6 | YGRGGRRQRRRPP | 1.1 ± 0.22 | 26 ± 4 | 23.6 | (17) |
DT-2 | YGRKKRRQRRRPPLRKKKKKH | 0.0125 ± 0.003 | 16.5 ± 3.8 | 1320 | (17) |
3.
Stephen W. Ragsdale 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(28):18571-18575
Of the eight known nickel enzymes, all but glyoxylase I catalyze the use and/or production of gases central to the global carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen cycles. Nickel appears to have been selected for its plasticity in coordination and redox chemistry and is able to cycle through three redox states (1+, 2+, 3+) and to catalyze reactions spanning ∼1.5 V. This minireview focuses on the catalytic mechanisms of nickel enzymes, with an emphasis on the role(s) of the metal center. The metal centers vary from mononuclear to complex metal clusters and catalyze simple hydrolytic to multistep redox reactions.Seven of the eight known nickel enzymes (1). CODH2 interconverts CO and CO2; ACS utilizes CO; the nickel ARD produces CO; hydrogenase generates/utilizes hydrogen gas; MCR generates methane; urease produces ammonia; and SOD generates O2.
Open in a separate windowThe nickel sites in enzymes exhibit extreme plasticity in nickel coordination and redox chemistry. The metal center in SOD must be able to redox processes with potentials that span from +890 to −160 mV (2), whereas in MCR and CODH, it must be able to reach potentials as low as −600 mV (3); thus, nickel centers in proteins perform redox chemistry over a potential range of ∼1.5 V!Because natural environments contain only trace amounts of soluble Ni2+, attaining sufficiently high intracellular nickel concentrations to meet the demand of the nickel enzymes requires a high affinity nickel uptake system(s) (4), molecular and metallochaperones (5), and sensors and regulators of the levels of enzymes involved in nickel homeostasis (6). However, space limitations prevent coverage of these pre-catalytic events. 相似文献
TABLE 1
Nickel-containing enzymesEnzyme | Reaction | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Glx I (EC 4.4.1.5) | Methylglyoxal → lactate + H2O (Reaction 1) | 7 |
ARD (EC 1.13.11.54) | 1,2-Dihydroxy-3-oxo-5-(methylthio)pent-1-ene + O2 → HCOOH + methylthiopropionate + CO (Reaction 2) | 9, 10 |
Ni-SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) | 2H+ + 2O2−̇ → H2O2 + O2 (Reaction 3) | 16, 19 |
Urease (EC 3.5.1.5) | H2N-CO-NH2 + 2H2O → 2NH3 + H2CO3 (Reaction 4) | 22, 23 |
Hydrogenase (EC 1.12.X.X) | 2H+ + 2e− ⇌ H2 (ΔE0′ = −414 mV) (Reaction 5) | 25, 26 |
MCR (EC 2.8.4.1) | CH3-CoM + CoBSH → CH4 + CoM-SS-CoB (Reaction 6) | 42, 43 |
CODH (EC 1.2.99.2) | 2e− + 2H+ + CO2 ⇌ CO + H2O (E0′ = −558 mV) (Reaction 7) | 30, 31 |
ACS (EC 2.3.1.169) | CH3-CFeSP + CoASH + CO → CH3-CO-SCoA + CFeSP (Reaction 8) | 30, 31 |
4.
5.
Denise W?tzlich Markus J. Br?cker Frank Uliczka Markus Ribbe Simone Virus Dieter Jahn Jürgen Moser 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(23):15530-15540
Nitrogenase-like light-independent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (DPOR) is involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Bacteriochlorophyll formation additionally requires the structurally related chlorophyllide oxidoreductase (COR). During catalysis, homodimeric subunit BchL2 or ChlL2 of DPOR transfers electrons to the corresponding heterotetrameric catalytic subunit, (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2. Analogously, subunit BchX2 of the COR enzymes delivers electrons to subunit (BchYZ)2. Various chimeric DPOR enzymes formed between recombinant subunits (BchNB)2 and BchL2 from Chlorobaculum tepidum or (ChlNB)2 and ChlL2 from Prochlorococcus marinus and Thermosynechococcus elongatus were found to be enzymatically active, indicating a conserved docking surface for the interaction of both DPOR protein subunits. Biotin label transfer experiments revealed the interaction of P. marinus ChlL2 with both subunits, ChlN and ChlB, of the (ChlNB)2 tetramer. Based on these findings and on structural information from the homologous nitrogenase system, a site-directed mutagenesis approach yielded 10 DPOR mutants for the characterization of amino acid residues involved in protein-protein interaction. Surface-exposed residues Tyr127 of subunit ChlL, Leu70 and Val107 of subunit ChlN, and Gly66 of subunit ChlB were found essential for P. marinus DPOR activity. Next, the BchL2 or ChlL2 part of DPOR was exchanged with electron-transferring BchX2 subunits of COR and NifH2 of nitrogenase. Active chimeric DPOR was generated via a combination of BchX2 from C. tepidum or Roseobacter denitrificans with (BchNB)2 from C. tepidum. No DPOR activity was observed for the chimeric enzyme consisting of NifH2 from Azotobacter vinelandii in combination with (BchNB)2 from C. tepidum or (ChlNB)2 from P. marinus and T. elongatus, respectively.Chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis, as well as nitrogen fixation, are essential biochemical processes developed early in the evolution of life (1). During biological fixation of nitrogen, nitrogenase catalyzes the reduction of atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia (2). Enzyme systems homologous to nitrogenase play a crucial role in the formation of the chlorin and bacteriochlorin ring system of chlorophylls (Chl)2 and bacteriochlorophylls (Bchl) (3, 4) (Fig. 1a). For the synthesis of both Chl and Bchl, the stereospecific reduction of the C-17-C-18 double bond of ring D of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) catalyzed by the nitrogenase-like enzyme light-independent (dark-operative) protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (DPOR) results in the formation of chlorophyllide (Chlide) (Fig. 1a, left) (5, 6). DPOR enzymes consist of three protein subunits which are designated BchN, BchB and BchL in Bchl-synthesizing organisms and ChlN, ChlB and ChlL in Chl-synthesizing organisms. A second reduction step at ring B (C-7-C-8) unique to the synthesis of Bchl converts the chlorin Chlide into a bacteriochlorin ring structure to form bacteriochlorophyllide (Bchlide) (Fig. 1a, right, Bchlide). This reaction is catalyzed by another nitrogenase-like enzyme, termed chlorophyllide oxidoreductase (COR) (7). COR enzymes are composed of subunits BchY, BchZ, and BchX.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Comparison of the three subunit enzymes DPOR, COR, and nitrogenase. a, during Chl and Bchl biosynthesis, ring D is stereospecifically reduced by the nitrogenase-like enzyme DPOR (subunit composition BchL2/(BchNB)2 or ChlL2/(ChlNB)2) leading to the chlorin Chlide. Subunits N, B, and L are named ChlN, ChlB, and ChlL in Chl-synthesizing organisms and BchN, BchB, and BchL in Bchl-synthesizing organisms. The synthesis of Bchl additionally requires the stereospecific B ring reduction by a second nitrogenase-like enzyme called COR, with the subunit composition BchX2/(BchYZ)2. COR catalyzes the formation of the bacteriochlorin Bchlide. Subunits Y, Z, and X of the COR enzyme are named BchY, BchZ, and BchX. b, the homologous nitrogenase complex has the subunit composition NifH2/(NifD/NifK)2. Rings A–E and the carbon atoms are designated according to IUPAC nomenclature (41). R is either a vinyl or an ethyl moiety. The position marked by an asterisk indicates either a vinyl or a hydroxyethyl moiety (42).All subunits share significant amino acid sequence homology to the corresponding subunits of nitrogenase, which are designated NifD, NifK, and NifH, respectively (1) (compare Fig. 1, a and b). Whereas subunits BchL or ChlL, BchX and NifH exhibit a sequence identity at the amino acid level of ∼33%, subunits BchN or ChlN, BchY, NifD, and BchB or ChlB, BchZ, and NifK, respectively, show lower sequence identities of ∼15% (1). For all enzymes a common oligomeric protein architecture has been proposed consisting of the heterotetrameric complexes (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2, (BchYZ)2, and (NifD/NifK)2, which are completed by a homodimeric protein subunit BchL2 or ChlL2, BchX2, and NifH2, respectively (compare Fig. 1, a and b) (3, 7, 8).Nitrogenase is a well characterized protein complex that catalyzes the reduction of nitrogen to ammonia in a reaction that requires at least 16 molecules of MgATP (2, 9, 10). During nitrogenase catalysis, subunit NifH2 (Fe protein) associates with and dissociates from the (NifD/NifK)2 complex (MoFe protein). Binding, hydrolysis of MgATP and structural rearrangements are coupled to sequential intersubunit electron transfer. For this purpose, NifH2 contains an ATP-binding motif and an intersubunit [4Fe-4S] cluster coordinated by two cysteine residues from each NifH monomer (1, 11). Electrons from this [4Fe-4S] cluster are transferred via a [8Fe-7S] cluster (P-cluster) onto the [1Mo-7Fe-9S-X-homocitrate] cluster (MoFe cofactor). Both of the latter clusters are located on (NifD/NifK)2, where dinitrogen is reduced to ammonia (10). Three-dimensional structures of NifH2 in complex with (NifD/NifK)2 revealed a detailed picture of the dynamic interaction of both subcomplexes (8, 12).Based on biochemical and bioinformatic approaches, it has been proposed that the initial steps of DPOR reaction strongly resemble nitrogenase catalysis. Key amino acid residues essential for DPOR function have been identified by mutagenesis of the enzyme from Chlorobaculum tepidum (formerly denoted as Chlorobium tepidum) (3). The catalytic mechanism of DPOR includes the electron transfer from a “plant-type” [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin onto the dimeric DPOR subunit, BchL2, carrying an intersubunit [4Fe-4S] redox center coordinated by Cys97 and Cys131 in C. tepidum. Analogous to nitrogenase, Lys10 in the phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) and Leu126 in the switch II region of DPOR were found essential for DPOR catalysis. Moreover, it was shown that the BchL2 protein from C. tepidum does not form a stable complex with the catalytic (BchNB)2 subcomplex. Therefore, a transient interaction responsible for the electron transfer onto protein subunit (BchNB)2 has been proposed (3).The subsequent [Fe-S] cluster-dependent catalysis and the specific substrate recognition at the active site located on subunit (BchNB)2 are unrelated to nitrogenase. The (BchNB)2 subcomplex was shown to carry a second [4Fe-4S] cluster, which was proposed to be ligated by Cys21, Cys46, and Cys103 of the BchN subunit and Cys94 of subunit BchB (C. tepidum numbering) (3). No evidence for any type of additional cofactor was obtained from biochemical and EPR spectroscopic analyses (5, 13). Thus, despite the same common oligomeric architecture, the catalytic subunits (BchNB)2 and (ChlNB)2 clearly differ from the corresponding nitrogenase complex, as no molybdenum-containing cofactor or P-cluster equivalent is employed (5, 14). From these results it was concluded that electrons from the [4Fe-4S] cluster of (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2 are transferred directly onto the Pchlide substrate at the active site of DPOR.The second nitrogenase-like enzyme, COR, catalyzes the reduction of ring B of Chlide during the biosynthesis of Bchl (7). Therefore, an accurate discrimination of the ring systems of the individual substrates is required. COR subunits share an overall amino acid sequence identity of 15–22% for BchY and BchZ and 31–35% for subunit BchX when compared with the corresponding DPOR subunits (supplemental Figures S2–S4). In amino acid sequence alignments of BchX proteins with the closely related BchL or ChlL subunits of DPOR, both cysteinyl ligands responsible for [4Fe-4S] cluster formation and residues for ATP binding are conserved (1). Furthermore, all cysteinyl residues characterized as ligands for a catalytic [4Fe-4S] cluster in (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2 are conserved in the sequences of subunits BchY and BchZ of COR (7). These findings correspond to a recent EPR study in which a characteristic signal for a [4Fe-4S] cluster was obtained for the COR subunit BchX2 as well as for subunit (BchYZ)2 (15). These results indicate that the catalytic mechanism of COR strongly resembles DPOR catalysis. In vitro assays for nitrogenase as well as for DPOR and COR make use of the artificial electron donor dithionite in the presence of high concentrations of ATP (7, 16, 17).
Open in a separate windowIn this study, we investigated the transient interaction of the dimeric subunit BchL2 or ChlL2 with the heterotetrameric (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2 complex, which is essential for DPOR catalysis. We make use of the individually purified DPOR subunits BchL2 and (BchNB)2 from the green sulfur bacterium C. tepidum and ChlL2 and (ChlNB)2 from the prochlorophyte Prochlorococcus marinus and from the cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus. The individual combination of (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2 complexes and BchL2 or ChlL2 proteins from these organisms resulted in catalytically active chimeras of DPOR. These results enabled us to propose conserved regions of the postulated docking surface, which were subsequently verified in a mutagenesis study. To elucidate the potential evolution of the electron-transferring subunit of nitrogenase and nitrogenase-like enzymes, we also analyzed chimeric enzymes consisting of DPOR subunits (BchNB)2 or (ChlNB)2 in combination with subunits BchX2 from C. tepidum and R. denitrificans of the COR enzyme and with subunit NifH2 of nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii, respectively. 相似文献
TABLE 1
Amino acid sequence identities of the individual subunits of DPOR, COR, and nitrogenaseAmino acid sequences of the individual subunits of DPOR, COR, and nitrogenase employed in the present study (compareFig. 3A) were aligned by using the ClustalW method in MegAlign (DNASTAR), and sequence identities were calculated.DPOR | COR | Nitrogenase | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | B | L | Y | Z | X | NifD | NifK | NifH | |
DPOR | |||||||||
N | 37–58 | 15–18 | 12–20 | ||||||
B | 34–62 | 15–22 | 14–18 | ||||||
L | 51–69 | 31–35 | 31–38 | ||||||
COR | |||||||||
Y | 35–78 | 13–15 | |||||||
Z | 39–81 | 11–16 | |||||||
X | 42–83 | 29–36 | |||||||
Nitrogenase | |||||||||
NifD | 17–70 | ||||||||
NifK | 37–58 | ||||||||
NifH | 67–75 |
6.
Raheleh Masoudi Maria S. Ioannou Michael D. Coughlin Promila Pagadala Kenneth E. Neet Oliver Clewes Shelley J. Allen David Dawbarn Margaret Fahnestock 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(27):18424-18433
Nerve growth factor (NGF) is produced as a precursor called pro-nerve growth factor (proNGF), which is secreted by many tissues and is the predominant form of NGF in the central nervous system. In Alzheimer disease brain, cholinergic neurons degenerate and can no longer transport NGF as efficiently, leading to an increase in untransported NGF in the target tissue. The protein that accumulates in the target tissue is proNGF, not the mature form. The role of this precursor is controversial, and both neurotrophic and apoptotic activities have been reported for recombinant proNGFs. Differences in the protein structures, protein expression systems, methods used for protein purification, and methods used for bioassay may affect the activity of these proteins. Here, we show that proNGF is neurotrophic regardless of mutations or tags, and no matter how it is purified or in which system it is expressed. However, although proNGF is neurotrophic under our assay conditions for primary sympathetic neurons and for pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells, it is apoptotic for unprimed PC12 cells when they are deprived of serum. The ratio of tropomyosin-related kinase A to p75 neurotrophin receptor is low in unprimed PC12 cells compared with primed PC12 cells and sympathetic neurons, altering the balance of proNGF-induced signaling to favor apoptosis. We conclude that the relative level of proNGF receptors determines whether this precursor exhibits neurotrophic or apoptotic activity.Nerve growth factor (NGF)3 regulates neuronal survival, neurite outgrowth, and differentiation in the peripheral and central nervous systems (1). The mature form of NGF forms a non-covalent homodimer and binds with high affinity (kd ≈ 10−11 m) to tropomyosin-related kinase A (TrkA) and with low affinity (kd ≈ 10−9 m) to the common neurotrophin receptor p75NTR (p75 neurotrophin receptor) (2). NGF promotes cell survival and growth in cells expressing TrkA through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway and the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (3, 4). p75NTR plays diverse roles, ranging from cell survival to cell death depending on the cellular context in which it is expressed. Through activation of the NF-κB pathway, p75NTR can contribute to cell survival in sensory neurons (5), it is involved in axonal growth via regulation of Rho activity (6), and it can interact with Trks to enhance neurotrophin affinity (at low concentration of ligand) and specificity of binding to Trks (7–9). High levels of p75NTR expression can induce apoptosis when there are low levels of Trk or when Trk is absent (10, 11). Apoptosis occurs through increased ceramide production (12), activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK1), and p53 (10, 13). p75NTR requires a co-receptor called sortilin to induce cell death (14).NGF is produced as a precursor called pro-nerve growth factor (proNGF) (15). ProNGF is secreted by many tissues such as prostate cells, spermatids, hair follicles, oral mucosal keratinocytes, sympathetic neurons, cortical astrocytes, heart, and spleen (16–20). ProNGF is the predominant form of NGF in the central and peripheral nervous systems, whereas little or no mature NGF can be detected (21–24). In Alzheimer disease brain, retrograde transport from the cortex and hippocampus to basal forebrain cholinergic neurons is reduced as these neurons degenerate, with concomitant proNGF accumulation in the cortex and hippocampus (21, 23). This suggested that proNGF mediates biological activity besides its prodomain function of promoting protein folding and regulation of neurotrophin secretion (25–28). To study the role of proNGF protein in vitro, point mutations were inserted at the cleavage site used by furin, a proprotein convertase known to cleave proNGF (29), to minimize the conversion of proNGF to mature NGF. The resulting recombinant, cleavage-resistant proNGFs reportedly exhibit either apoptotic activity (30, 31) or neurotrophic activity (32, 33). These recombinant proteins differ in several ways (ProNGF(R−1G) ProNGFhis ProNGFE ProNGF123 WT-NGFhis Mutations −1 (R to G) −2 and −1 (RR to AA), 118 and 119 (RR to AA) −1 and +1 (RS to AA) −73 and −72 (RR to AA), −43 and −42 (KKRR to KAAR), −2 and −1 (KR to AA) None: cleavable proNGF Tag No tag Histidine tag No tag No tag Histidine tag Expression system Insect cells Insect cells, mammalian cells Bacteria Insect cells Insect cells, mammalian cells Purification No purification Nickel column Refolded from inclusion bodies, FPLC Cation exchange chromatography, immunoaffinity chromatography Nickel column