Potent vasodilator responses to human urotensin-II in human pulmonary and abdominal resistance arteries

The peptide human urotensin-II (hUT-II) and its receptor have recently been cloned. The vascular function of this peptide in humans, however, has yet to be determined. Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator responses to hUT-II were investigated in human small muscular pulmonary arteries [approximately 70 microm internal diameter (ID)] and human abdominal resistance arteries (approximately 200 microm ID). Vasodilator responses were investigated in endothelin-1 (3 nM) precontracted vessels and, in the small pulmonary vessels, compared with the known vasodilators adrenomedullin, sodium nitroprusside, and acetylcholine. In human small pulmonary arteries, hUT-II did not induce vasoconstriction but was a potent vasodilator [-log M concentration causing 50% of the maximum vasodilator effect (pIC(50)) 10.4 +/- 0.5; percentage of reduction in tone (E(max)) 81 +/- 8% (vs. 23 +/- 11% in time controls), n = 5]. The order of potency for vasodilation was human urotensin-II = adrenomedullin (pIC(50) 10.1 +/- 0.4, n = 6) > sodium nitroprusside (pIC(50) 7.4 +/- 0.2, n = 6) = acetylcholine (pIC(50) 6.8 +/- 0.3, n = 6). In human abdominal arteries, hUT-II did not induce vasoconstriction but was a potent vasodilator [pIC(50) 10.3 +/- 0.7; E(max) 96 +/- 8% (vs. 43 +/- 16% in time controls), n = 4]. This is the first report that hUT-II is a potent vasodilator but not a vasoconstrictor of human small pulmonary arteries and systemic resistance arteries.     

2-Aminomethyl piperidines as novel urotensin-II receptor antagonists

A series of 2-aminomethyl piperidines has been discovered as novel urotensin-II receptor antagonists. The synthesis, initial structure-activity relationships, and optimization of the initial hit that resulted in the identification of potent, cross-species active, and functional urotensin-II receptor antagonists such as 1a and 11a are described.     

Design,synthesis, conformational analysis,and biological studies of urotensin-II lactam analogues

Human urotensin II (hU-II; H-Glu-Thr-Pro-Asp-cyclo[Cys-Phe-Trp-Lys-Tyr-Cys]-Val-OH) is a disulfide bridged undecapeptide recently identified as the ligand of an orphan G protein-coupled receptor. hU-II has been described as the most potent vasoconstrictor compound identified to date. With the aim of replacing the disulfide bridge by a chemically more stable moiety, we have synthesized and tested a series of lactam analogues of hU-II minimum active fragment, that is hU-II(4-11). The contractile activity of the synthetic analogues on the rat isolated thoracic aorta was found to be dependent upon the dimension of the lactam bridge. The most active peptide, H-Asp-cyclo[Orn-Phe-Trp-Lys-Tyr-Asp]-Val-OH (3), is approximately 2 logs less potent than hU-II (pD(2)=6.3 vs 8.4). A conformational analysis in solution of the active peptide 3, one of the inactive analogues, and hU-II was performed, using NMR and molecular modelling techniques. A superposition of the calculated structures of hU-II and 3 clearly shows that three out of four key residues (i.e., Phe(6), Lys(8) and Tyr(9)) maintain the same side- chain orientation, while the fourth one, Trp(7), cannot be superimposed. This observation could explain the reduced biological activity of the synthetic analogue.     

Ligand-supported homology modeling of the human angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor: insights into the molecular determinants of telmisartan binding

Angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor belongs to the super-family of G-protein-coupled receptors, and antagonists of the AT(1) receptor are effectively used in the treatment of hypertension. To understand the molecular interactions of these antagonists, such as losartan and telmisartan, with the AT(1) receptor, a homology model of the human AT(1) (hAT(1)) receptor with all connecting loops was constructed from the 2.6 A resolution crystal structure (PDB i.d., 1L9H) of bovine rhodopsin. The initial model generated by MODELLER was subjected to a stepwise ligand-supported model refinement. This protocol involved initial docking of non-peptide AT(1) antagonists in the putative binding site, followed by several rounds of iterative energy minimizations and molecular dynamics simulations. The final model was validated based on its correlation with several structure-activity relationships and site-directed mutagenesis data. The final model was also found to be in agreement with a previously reported AT(1) antagonist pharmacophore model. Docking studies were performed for a series of non-peptide AT(1) receptor antagonists in the active site of the final hAT(1) receptor model. The docking was able to identify key molecular interactions for all the AT(1) antagonists studied. Reasonable correlation was observed between the interaction energy values and the corresponding binding affinities of these ligands, providing further validation for the model. In addition, an extensive unrestrained molecular dynamics simulation showed that the docking-derived bound pose of telmisartan is energetically stable. Knowledge gained from the present studies can be used in structure-based drug design for developing novel ligands for the AT(1) receptor.     

Molecular interactions of nonpeptide agonists and antagonists with the melanocortin-4 receptor

The melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor is a potential therapeutic target for obesity and cachexia, for which nonpeptide agonists and antagonists are being developed, respectively. The aim of this study was to identify molecular interactions between the MC4 receptor and nonpeptide ligands, and to compare the mechanism of binding between agonist and antagonist ligands. Nonpeptide ligand interaction was affected by mutations that reduce peptide ligand binding (D122A, D126A, S190A, M200A, F261A, and F284A), confirming overlapping binding determinants for peptide and nonpeptide ligands. The common halogenated phenyl group of nonpeptide ligands was a determinant of F261A and F284A mutations' affinity-reducing effect, implying this group interacts with the aromatic side chains of these residues. All affected compounds contain this group, the mutations reduced binding of 2,4-dichloro-substituted compounds more than 4-chloro-substituted-compounds, and F284A mutation eliminated the affinity-enhancing effect of 2-chloro-substitution. F261A and F284A mutations reduced the affinity of antagonists more than agonists, suggesting that the stronger ligand interaction with these residues, the lower the ligand efficacy. Supporting this hypothesis, F261A mutation increased the efficacy of nonpeptide antagonist and partial agonist ligands. D122A and D126A mutations reduced nonpeptide ligand interaction. Removing the ligands' derivatized amide group eliminated the effect of the mutations. Interaction of agonists, which bear a common amine within this group, was strongly reduced by D126A mutation (550-3300-fold), suggesting an electrostatic interaction between the amine and the acidic group of D126. These postulated interactions with aromatic and acidic regions of the MC4 receptor are consistent with a molecular model of the receptor. Furthermore, the strength of interaction with the aromatic pocket, and potentially the acidic pocket, controls the signaling efficacy of the ligand.     

Solution structure of urotensin-II receptor extracellular loop III and characterization of its interaction with urotensin-II

Urotensin-II (U-II) is a vasoactive hormone that acts through a G-protein-coupled receptor named UT. Recently, we have shown, using the surface plasmon resonance technology that human U-II (hU-II) interacts with the hUT(281-300) fragment, a segment containing the extracellular loop III (EC-III) and short extensions of the transmembrane domains VI and VII (TM-VI and TM-VII). To further investigate the interaction of UT receptor with U-II, we have determined the solution structure of hUT(281-300) by high-resolution NMR and molecular modeling and we have examined, also using NMR, the binding with hU-II at residue level. In the presence of dodecylphosphocholine micelles, hUT(281-300) exhibited a type III beta-turn (Q285-L288), followed by an -helical structure (A289-L299), the latter including a stretch of transmembrane helix VII. Upon addition of hU-II, significant chemical shift perturbations were observed for residues located just on the N-terminal side of the beta-turn (end of TM-VI/beginning of EC-III) and on one face of the -helix (end of EC-III/beginning of TM-VII). These data, in conjunction with intermolecular NOEs, suggest that the initiation site of EC-III, as well as the upstream portion of helix VII, would be involved in agonist binding and allow to propose points of interaction in the ligand-receptor complex.     

Nonpeptide Urotensin-II receptor agonists and antagonists: review and structure-activity relationships

Human Urotensin-II (hU-II) is a cyclic 11-amino acid peptide that plays a role in cardiovascular homeostasis. Its receptor is a member of the class A of G-protein-coupled receptors, called GPR14. In recent years, several nonpeptide ligands have been reported in the literature. Most were identified by high-throughput screening and optimized by medicinal chemistry methods. Other nonpeptide ligands were discovered starting from the 3D structure of hU-II or other ligands. They were identified by a virtual screening approach based on a 3D pharmacophore or by structural similarity with others cyclic peptides. In this review, nonpeptide agonists and antagonists are presented in relation to structure-activity relationships.     

Aminoalkoxybenzyl pyrrolidines as novel human urotensin-II receptor antagonists

High throughput screening of the corporate compound collection led to the discovery of a novel series of substituted aminoalkoxybenzyl pyrrolidines as human urotensin-II receptor antagonists. The synthesis, initial structure-activity relationships, and optimization of the initial hit that led to the identification of a truncated sub-series, represented by SB-436811 (1a), are described.     

Potent and selective small-molecule human urotensin-II antagonists with improved pharmacokinetic profiles

Lead compound 1 was successfully redesigned to provide compounds with improved pharmacokinetic profiles for this series of human urotensin-II antagonists. Replacement of the 2-pyrrolidinylmethyl-3-phenyl-piperidine core of 1 with a substituted N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethanamine core as in compound 7 resulted in compounds with improved oral bioavailability in rats. The relationship between stereochemistry and selectivity for hUT over the kappa-opioid receptor was also explored.     

Preliminary mutational analysis of the human kinin B2 receptor for nonpeptide antagonist ligands recognition

FR173657, LF16,0335, and LF16,0687 are nonpeptide antagonists, endowed with high affinity and selectivity for the human kinin B2 receptor. The kinin B2 receptor belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane (TM) helices. In the present study, we aimed, through computer-assisted modeling and mutagenesis, to identify residues in the human B2 receptor (hB2R) amino acid sequence that are involved in nonpeptide antagonist binding in order to build up experimental data as a first step towards a molecular model of nonpeptide ligands binding site. Fourteen amino acid residues within the TM segments were mutated to alanine. The wild type and mutant receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (dhfr-) cells and tested for their ability to bind agonist ([3H]bradykinin) and peptide antagonist ([3H]MENI 1270) radioligands. The affinity of nonpeptide ligands was determined by heterologous competition experiments using the above radioligands. We found that some mutations in TM2 (W86A) and TM7 (Y295A, N297A) impair the binding affinity of the three nonpeptide antagonists. On the other hand, some mutated residues in TM3 (S1 17A) and TM6 (W256A) reduce the affinity of LF16,0335 and LF16,0687 only. Results are discussed in order to build up a hypothesis for the likely different interactions of various nonpeptide ligands with the B2 receptor.     

Elevated plasma levels of human urotensin-II immunoreactivity in congestive heart failure

Human urotensin-II (hU-II) is the most potent endogenous cardiostimulant identified to date. We therefore determined whether hU-II has a possible pathological role by investigating its levels in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Blood samples were obtained from the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery from CHF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and the aortic root from patients undergoing investigative angiography for chest pain who were not in heart failure. Immunoreactive hU-II (hU-II-ir) levels were determined with radioimmunoassay. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients (230.9 +/- 68.7 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts (22.7 +/- 6.1 pg/ml, n = 18). This increase was attributed to cardiopulmonary production of hU-II-ir because levels were lower in the pulmonary artery (38.2 +/- 6.1 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) than in the aortic root. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (142.1 +/- 51.5 pg/ml, n = 10; P < 0.05) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts without coronary artery disease (27.3 +/- 12.4 pg/ml, n = 7) and CHF patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (311.6 +/- 120.4 pg/ml, n = 11; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts and coronary artery disease (19.8 +/- 6.6 pg/ml, n = 11). hU-II-ir was significantly higher in the aortic root than in the pulmonary artery and femoral vein, with a nonsignificant trend for higher levels in the aortic root than in the femoral artery. The findings indicated that hU-II-ir is elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients and that hU-II-ir is cleared at least in part from the microcirculation.     

Building a MCHR1 homology model provides insight into the receptor-antagonist contacts that are important for the development of new anti-obesity agents

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) regulates feeding and energy homeostasis through interaction with its receptor, the melanin-concentrating receptor 1 (MCHR1), making it a target in the treatment of obesity. Molecular modeling and docking studies were performed in order to find a binding model for the docking of two new series of MCHR1 antagonists to the receptor. Results suggested interactions between the ligands and two glutamines (Gln5.42 and Gln6.55) not conserved in many of the GPCRs family members. Histamine 3 receptor (HRH3) presents two apolar residues in the aforementioned positions and the available biological data against this receptor supported the role of the two glutamines in the binding of antagonists to the MCHR1. This knowledge could be useful in the development of new, more active and more selective MCHR1 antagonists.     

Molecular modelling of human 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT2A) and virtual screening studies towards the identification of agonist and antagonist molecules

The serotonin receptors, also known as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors, are a group of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ligand-gated ion channels found in the central and peripheral nervous systems. GPCRs have a characteristic feature of activating different signalling pathways upon ligand binding and these ligands display several efficacy levels to differentially activate the receptor. GPCRs are primary drug targets due to their central role in several signal transduction pathways. Drug design for GPCRs is also most challenging due to their inherent promiscuity in ligand recognition, which gives rise to several side effects of existing drugs. Here, we have performed the ligand interaction study using the two prominent states of GPCR, namely the active and inactive state of the 5-HT_2A receptor. Active state of 5-HT_2A receptor model enhances the understanding of conformational difference which influences the ligand-binding site. A 5-HT_2A receptor active state model was constructed by homology modelling using active state β₂-adrenergic receptor (β₂-AR). In addition, virtual screening and docking studies with both active and inactive state models reveal potential small molecule hits which could be considered as agonist-like and antagonist-like molecules. The results from the all-atom molecular dynamics simulations further confirmed that agonists and antagonists interact in different modes with the receptor.     

Arginine 336 and asparagine 333 of the human cholecystokinin-A receptor binding site interact with the penultimate aspartic acid and the C-terminal amide of cholecystokinin.

The cholecystokinin-A receptor (CCK-AR) is a G protein-coupled receptor that mediates important central and peripheral cholecystokinin actions. Residues of the CCK-AR binding site that interact with the C-terminal part of CCK that is endowed with biological activity are still unknown. Here we report on the identification of Arg-336 and Asn-333 of CCK-AR, which interact with the Asp-8 carboxylate and the C-terminal amide of CCK-9, respectively. Identification of the two amino acids was achieved by dynamics-based docking of CCK in a refined three-dimensional model of CCK-AR using, as constraints, previous results that demonstrated that Trp-39/Gln-40 and Met-195/Arg-197 interact with the N terminus and the sulfated tyrosine of CCK, respectively. Arg-336-Asp-8 and Asn-333-amide interactions were pharmacologically assessed by mutational exchange of Arg-336 and Asn-333 in the receptor or reciprocal elimination of the partner chemical functions in CCK. This study also allowed us to demonstrate that (i) the identified interactions are crucial for stabilizing the high affinity phospholipase C-coupled state of the CCK-AR.CCK complex, (ii) Arg-336 and Asn-333 are directly involved in interactions with nonpeptide antagonists SR-27,897 and L-364,718, and (iii) Arg-336 but not Asn-333 is directly involved in the binding of the peptide antagonist JMV 179 and the peptide partial agonist JMV 180. These data will be used to obtain an integrated dynamic view of the molecular processes that link agonist binding to receptor activation.     

Modeling and docking of the three-dimensional structure of the human melanocortin 4 receptor

A three-dimensional structure of the human melanocortin 4 receptor (hMC4R) is constructed in this study using a computer-aided molecular modeling approach. Human melanocortin 4 receptor is a G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR). We structurally aligned transmembrane helices with bovine rhodopsin transmembrane domains, simulated both intracellular and extracellular loop domains on homologous loop regions in other proteins of known 3D structure and modeled the C terminus on the corresponding part of bovine rhodopsin. Then tandem minimization and dynamics calculations were run to refine the crude structure. The simulative model was tested by docking with a triplet peptide (RFF) ligand. It was found that the ligand is located among transmembrane regions TM3, TM4, TM5, and TM6 of hMC4R. In consistence with mutational and biochemical data, binding site is mainly formed as a hydrophobic and negatively charged pocket. The model constructed here might provide a structural framework for making rational predictions in relevant fields.     

Theoretical evidence of a salt bridge disruption as the initiating process for the alpha1d-adrenergic receptor activation: a molecular dynamics and docking study

This study reports the building of the three-dimensional structure of the rat alpha1d-adrenergic receptor through a topology approach based on the structure of the rhodopsin receptor from cryoelectron microscopy. The validity and reliability of the receptor model were assessed through exhaustive molecular dynamics and docking studies. Some interesting ligand-receptor interactions were identified along with significant differences between the binding mode of agonists and antagonists. The importance of the disruption of a salt bridge as a possible initial event leading to receptor activation is discussed on the basis of data from mutagenesis and molecular dynamics studies.     

Species selectivity of nonpeptide antagonists of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor is determined by residues in extracellular loops II and III and the amino terminus

Efforts to develop orally available gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists have led to the discovery of several classes of potent nonpeptide antagonists. Here we investigated molecular interactions of three classes of nonpeptide antagonists with human, rat, and macaque GnRH receptors. Although all are high affinity ligands of the human receptor (K(i) <5 nm), these compounds show reduced affinity for the macaque receptor and bind only weakly (K(i) >1 microm) to the rat receptor. To identify residues responsible for this selectivity, a series of chimeric receptors and mutant receptors was constructed and evaluated for nonpeptide binding. Surprisingly, 4 key residues located in the amino terminus (Met-24) and extracellular loops II (Ser-203, Gln-208) and III (Leu-300) of the GnRH receptor appear to be primarily responsible for species-selective binding. Comparisons of reciprocal mutations suggest that these may not be direct contacts but rather may be involved in organizing extracellular portions of the receptor. These data are novel because most previous reports of residues involved in binding of nonpeptide ligands to peptide-activated G protein-coupled receptors, including the GnRH receptor as well as mono-amine receptors, have identified binding sites in the transmembrane regions.     

Homology modelling and molecular dynamics study of human fatty acid amide hydrolase

The three-dimensional (3D) model of the human fatty acid amide hydrolase (hFAAH) was constructed based on the crystal structure of the rat FAAH (PDB code 1MT5) in complex with a substrate using Modeller9v2 program. With the aid of molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics method, the last model was obtained and further assessed by Profile-3D, Prosa2003 and Procheck, which confirms that the refined model is reliable. Furthermore, the docking results of propofol and its structural analogue into the active site of hFAAH indicate that 2,6-di-sec-butyl phenol is a more preferred ligand than others, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. From the docking studies, we also suggest that Phe192, Ile238, Thr377, Leu380, Phe381, Phe388 and Leu404 in the hFAAH are seven important determinant residues in binding as they have strong van der Waal interactions with the ligand.     

In Silico Study of the Structurally Similar ORL1 Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Pairs Reveal Possible Mechanism of Receptor Activation

An opioid receptor like (ORL1) receptor is a member of a family of G-protein coupled receptors. It is a new pharmaceutical target with broad therapeutic potential in the regulation of important biological functions such as nociception, mood disorders, drug abuse, learning or cardiovascular control. The crystal structure of this receptor in complex with an antagonist was determined recently (PDB ID: 4EA3). By removing the ligand and subjecting the empty receptor to molecular dynamics simulation in a solvated lipid membrane we obtained an optimized ORL1 receptor structure which could be used in a subsequent docking study of two structurally similar agonist–antagonist ligand pairs. Ligands were docked to the empty ORL1 receptor (with and without the third intracellular loop, IC3) in different orientations, and the resulting complexes were monitored during molecular dynamics simulation in order to see how the subtle differences in structure of agonists and antagonists might affect ligand–receptor interactions and trigger receptor activation. It was established that agonists and antagonists bound to the same, relatively large, binding site in the receptor, created by residues from transmembrane helices TM2, TM3, TM5, TM6 and TM7 and close to the extra cellular end of the receptor bundle. The key difference between these two types of ligands is interaction with residue Val283^6.55 and a flexibility of ligand molecules. Ligands that cannot easily avoid this interaction will initiate movement of the intracellular end of TM6 (by a mechanism which involves Met134^3.36 and several aminoacids of TM5) and possibly activate the receptor when assisted by G-protein.