circRNA and gastrointestinal cancer

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of endogenous noncoding RNAs that form covalently closed continuous loops without 3′ end poly (A) tails and 5′ end caps. circRNAs are more conservative and stable than linear RNA. circRNAs can specifically bind to microRNAs as competing endogenous RNA, thereby directly or indirectly regulating the expression of related genes. circRNAs have been implicated in several cancers including gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Some circRNAs have the potential to become biological biomarkers and therapeutic targets of GI cancers. However, the multiple functional roles of circRNAs in GI cancers remain largely unclear.     

肌肉特异表达microRNA的功能研究

MicroRNA作为非编码小RNA分子在转录和后转录水平调控基因表达过程中扮演重要角色,已成为当前分子生物学的研究热点之一。近期已有研究证实,一些在肌肉细胞中特异表达microRNA包括miR-1、miR-206和miR-133可能对肌肉生长和发育很关键。众所周知,肌肉不仅是机体重要结构组织和运动器官,而且还是水产畜牧产品的重要蛋白源。聚焦这些肌肉特异myomiRs在肌肉生长和发育中的功能机理研究,不仅有助于揭示某些疾病的分子机制和解决医学上基因治疗难题;同时也为畜牧水产养殖提供科学应用理论依据。综述我们概括了miR-1, miR-206和miR-133最新研究进展,这将有助于深入了解其作用于肌肉生长和发育的功能和分子机制。       

Non-coding RNAs regulate tumor cell plasticity

Tumor metastasis is one of the most serious challenges for human cancers as the majority of deaths caused by cancer are associated with metastasis, rather than the primary tumor. Recent studies have demonstrated that tumor cell plasticity plays a critical role in tumor metastasis by giving rise to various cell types which is necessary for tumor to invade adjacent tissues and form distant metastasis. These include differentiation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), or epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse process, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that the biology of tumor cell plasticity is tightly linked to functions of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), especially microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Therefore, understanding the mechanisms how non-coding RNAs regulate tumor cell plasticity is essential for discovery of new diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets to overcome metastasis.     

Regulation of microRNAs in cancer metastasis

Metastasis is a phenomenon of crucial importance in defining prognosis in patients with cancer and is often responsible for cancer-related mortality. It is known that several steps are necessary for clonal cells to disseminate from their primary tumor site and colonize distant tissues, thus originating metastatic lesions. Therefore, investigating the molecular actors regulating this process may provide helpful insights in the development of efficient therapeutic responses. Recent evidences have indicated the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in modulating the metastatic process in solid tumors. miRNAs are small regulatory non-coding RNAs that bind to specific target mRNAs, leading to translational repression. miRNAs are known to act as negative regulators of gene expression and are involved in the regulation of biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis, both in physiological conditions and during diseases, such as tumors. In the specific field of tumorigenesis, miRNAs play an important role in mediating oncogenesis and favoring tumor progression, as a result of their ability to modulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and other series of events facilitating the formation of metastasis. The role of miRNAs in cancer development has been widely studied and has helped elucidate events such as the change in expression of oncogenes, tumor-suppressors and cancer-related proteins. This review focuses on the mechanisms underlying the role of miRNAs as part of the metastatic process.     

miR-31: A crucial overseer of tumor metastasis and other emerging roles

MicroRNAs constitute a family of pleiotropically acting short regulatory RNAs. Increasingly, specific microRNAs have been implicated as key modulators of a variety of normal physiologic processes; moreover, the aberrant activity of certain microRNAs has been linked to the pathogenesis of multiple diseases. The microRNA miR-31 has been identified as a crucial overseer of several normal and diseased phenotypes. Here, we describe current knowledge regarding the functions of miR-31, with an emphasis placed upon the role of this microRNA in neoplastic development and tumor metastasis. Additionally, we highlight a number of recent reports concerning the contributions of miR-31 to other pathological states, the role of this microRNA in normal physiology, and the upstream mechanisms by which miR-31 expression levels are regulated. Assessed collectively, existing evidence suggests that miR-31 concomitantly regulates a number of essential signaling pathways in mammalian cells. For these reasons, further elucidation of the biological actions of miR-31 may prove significant for the prognosis and remediation of various pathological states.     

Human papillomavirus genotype 31 does not express detectable microRNA levels during latent or productive virus replication

It has recently become clear that several pathogenic DNA viruses express virally encoded microRNAs in infected cells. In particular, numerous microRNAs have been identified in a range of human and animal herpesviruses, and individual microRNAs have also been identified in members of the polyoma- and adenovirus families. Although their functions remain largely unknown, it seems likely that these viral microRNAs play an important role in viral replication in vivo. Here we present an analysis of the microRNAs expressed in human cells during the latent and productive phases of the human papillomavirus genotype 31 (HPV31) replication cycle. Although over 500 cellular microRNAs were cloned and identified, not a single HPV31-specific microRNA was obtained. We therefore concluded that HPV31, and possibly human papillomaviruses in general, does not express viral microRNAs.     

Regulatory non‐coding RNAs in acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases that leads to high mortality and morbidity globally. Various therapeutic targets for AMI have been investigated in recent years, including the non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs). NcRNAs, a class of RNA molecules that typically do not code proteins, are divided into several subgroups. Among them, microRNAs (miRNAs) are widely studied for their modulation of several pathological aspects of AMI, including cardiomyocyte apoptosis, inflammation, angiogenesis and fibrosis. It has emerged that long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) also regulate these processes via interesting mechanisms. However, the regulatory functions of ncRNAs in AMI and their underlying functional mechanisms have not been systematically described. In this review, we summarize the recent findings involving ncRNA actions in AMI and briefly describe the novel mechanisms of these ncRNAs, highlighting their potential application as therapeutic targets in AMI.     

MicroRNAs targeting prostate cancer stem cells

Prostate cancer is a frequently diagnosed cancer in males with high mortality in the world. As a heterogeneous tissue, the tumor mass contains a subpopulation that is called as cancer stem cells and displays stem-like properties such as self-renewal, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and drug resistance. Cancer stem cells have been identified in variant tumors and shown to be regulated by various molecules including microRNAs. MicroRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs, which can influence tumorigenesis via different mechanisms. In this review, we focus on the functions of microRNAs on regulating the stemness of prostate cancer stem cells with different mechanisms and propose the potential roles of microRNAs in prostate cancer therapy.     

Divergent Roles for IRS-1 and IRS-2 in Breast Cancer Metastasis

The insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins are cytoplasmic docking proteins that function as essential signaling intermediates downstream of activated cell surface receptors, many of which have been implicated in breast cancer. The IRS proteins do not contain intrinsic kinase activity but rather function by organizing signaling complexes to initiate intracellular signaling cascades. IRS-1 and IRS-2 are expressed in normal mammary epithelial cells and in breast carcinoma cells, where they have been implicated in mediating signals to promote tumor cell survival, growth and motility. Although IRS-1 and IRS-2 are homologous, recent studies have revealed distinct functions for these adaptor proteins in regulating breast cancer progression. Specifically, IRS-2 is a positive regulator of metastasis, whereas IRS-1 may be a suppressor of metastasis. The observation that IRS-1 is inactivated in metastatic mammary tumors raises the possibility that IRS activity, rather than expression, may be a novel predictive indicator of metastasis. Understanding how the IRS proteins function in tumor progression is essential for future efforts aimed at developing approaches to target IRS-1 and IRS-2 in a diagnostic or therapeutic manner for the benefit of breast cancer patients.     

肿瘤转移中E-钙粘蛋白的调控

E-钙粘蛋白是参与细胞间粘附连接的主要分子,发挥着维持细胞极性和组织结构完整性的功能.肿瘤组织中E-钙粘蛋白介导的细胞间粘附力减弱,使细胞获得浸润性和游走迁移能力.在细胞迁移到新的位置后,E-钙粘蛋白重新表达,有利于肿瘤细胞在继发部位生长增殖,形成新的病灶.E-钙粘蛋白功能调控在肿瘤转移中的作用主要涉及到以下几种机制,编码基因修饰,基因转录抑制及microRNA调节.其中microRNA通过影响E-钙粘蛋白的转录或表达在肿瘤转移过程发挥了重要作用,为肿瘤转移的临床诊断和靶向治疗开辟了新的思路.本文主要就肿瘤转移过程中E-钙粘蛋白的表达变化以及相应调控机制做一综述.     

MicroRNAs: Crucial multi-tasking components in the complex circuitry of tumor metastasis

Distant metastases are the underlying cause of patient mortality in an overwhelming majority of human carcinomas. Certain microRNAs have recently been found capable of regulating the process of tumor metastasis. In this review, we highlight recent advances within this rapidly emerging field, endeavor to connect known microRNA pathways with recent conceptual advances in the larger field of metastasis research, and speculate regarding the future utility of microRNAs in the diagnosis and treatment of human cancers. Assessed collectively, current evidence suggests that the pleiotropic activities of microRNAs endow them with the capacity to function as crucial, yet previously unappreciated, nodes within already-identified metastasis regulatory circuitry. This has important implications for our understanding of the pathogenesis of high-grade malignancies.     

X‐chromosome‐located microRNAs in immunity: Might they explain male/female differences?

In this paper, we hypothesize that X chromosome-associated mechanisms, which affect X-linked genes and are behind the immunological advantage of females, may also affect X-linked microRNAs. The human X chromosome contains 10% of all microRNAs detected so far in the human genome. Although the role of most of them has not yet been described, several X chromosome-located microRNAs have important functions in immunity and cancer. We therefore provide a detailed map of all described microRNAs located on human and mouse X chromosomes, and highlight the ones involved in immune functions and oncogenesis. The unique mode of inheritance of the X chromosome is ultimately the cause of the immune disadvantage of males and the enhanced survival of females following immunological challenges. How these aspects influence X-linked microRNAs will be a challenge for researchers in the coming years, not only from an evolutionary point of view, but also from the perspective of disease etiology.     

MicroRNAs in melanocyte and melanoma biology

The importance of microRNAs as key molecular components of cellular processes is now being recognized. Recent reports have shown that microRNAs regulate processes as diverse as protein expression and nuclear functions inside cells and are able to signal extracellularly, delivered via exosomes, to influence cell fate at a distance. The versatility of microRNAs as molecular tools inspires the design of novel strategies to control gene expression, protein stability, DNA repair and chromatin accessibility that may prove very useful for therapeutic approaches due to the extensive manageability of these small molecules. However, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the microRNA network and its interactions with the other layers of regulatory elements in cellular and extracellular functions. This knowledge may be necessary before we exploit microRNA versatility in therapeutic settings. To identify rules of interactions between microRNAs and other regulatory systems, we begin by reviewing microRNA activities in a single cell type: the melanocyte, from development to disease.     

MicroRNA Profiling of Pericardial Fluid Samples from Patients with Heart Failure

Aims

Multicellular organisms maintain vital functions through intercellular communication. Release of extracellular vesicles that carry signals to even distant target organs is one way of accomplishing this communication. MicroRNAs can also be secreted from the cells in exosomes and act as paracrine signalling molecules. In addition, microRNAs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of a large number of diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, and are considered as promising candidate biomarkers due to their relative stability and easy quantification from clinical samples. Pericardial fluid contains hormones secreted by the heart and is known to reflect the cardiac function. In this study, we sought to investigate whether pericardial fluid contains microRNAs and if so, whether they could be used to distinguish between different cardiovascular pathologies and disease stages.

Methods and Results

Pericardial fluid was collected from heart failure patients during open-heart surgery. MicroRNA profiles of altogether 51 patients were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using Exiqon human panels I and II. On the average, 256 microRNAs were detected per sample, and 70 microRNAs out of 742 profiled microRNAs were detected in every sample. The five most abundant microRNAs in pericardial fluid were miR-21-5p, miR-451a, miR-125b-5p, let-7b-5p and miR-16-5p. No specific signatures for cardiovascular pathologies or clinically assessed heart failure stages could be detected from the profiles and, overall, microRNA profiles of the samples were found to be very similar despite the heterogeneity in the study population.

Conclusion

Measured microRNA profiles did not separate the samples according to the clinical features of the patients. However, several previously identified heart failure marker microRNAs were detected. The pericardial fluid microRNA profile appeared to be a result of an active and selective secretory process indicating that microRNAs may act as paracrine signalling factors by mediating the local crosstalk between cardiac cells.