Excision of 5,6-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydrothymine, 5,6-dihydrothymine, and 5-hydroxycytosine from defined sequence oligonucleotides by Escherichia coli endonuclease III and Fpg proteins: kinetic and mechanistic aspects

Oligonucleotides that contain a single modified pyrimidine, i.e., thymine glycol (Tg), 5,6-dihydrothymine (DHT), and 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OHC) were synthesized in order to investigate the substrate specificity and the excision mechanism of two Escherichia coli repair enzymes: endonuclease III and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg). Three techniques of analysis were employed. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) assay with HPLC prepurification was used to quantify the release of the modified bases, while polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) provided insights into the mechanism of oligonucleotide cleavage. Values of Vm/Km constants lead to the conclusion that the substrates are processed by endonuclease III with the following preference: Tg > 5-OHC > DHT. This confirms that Tg is an excellent substrate for endonuclease III. Fpg-mediated cleavage of the 5-OHC-containing oligonucleotide is processed at the same rate than endonuclease III. Furthermore, Fpg was found to have a little but relevant activity on DHT-containing oligonucleotide, thus broadening the substrate specificity of this enzyme to a new modified pyrimidine. While 5-OHC-containing oligonucleotides are cleaved by the two enzymes, no or a small amount of the modified base was found to be released, as determined by GC-MS. From these data it may be suggested that 5-OHC could be modified during its enzymatic excision. Finally, MALDI-MS analyses shed new light on the mechanism of action of endonuclease III: the molecular masses of the repaired fragments of 5-OHC- and DHT-containing oligonucleotides showed that endonuclease III cleaves the DNA backbone mainly through a hydrolytic process and that no beta-elimination product was detected.     

Activities involved in base excision repair of bacteriophage T4 and lambda DNA in vivo

Summary The in vivo excision repair functions of Escherichia coli exonuclease III and 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase I, and bacteriophage T4 pyrimidine dimer-DNA glycosylase were investigated. Following exposure of bacteriophage T4 or lambda to methyl methanesulfonate or ultraviolet irradiation, survival was determined by plating on E. coli have various genetic backgrounds. Although exonuclease III was shown to participate in base excision repair initiated by 3-methyladenine DNA glcosylase I, it had no detectable role in base excision repair initiated by the T4 pyrimidine dimer-DNA glycosylase. Despite its 3 apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity in vitro, T4 pyrimidine dimer-DNA glycosylase, even in large quantities, did not complement mutants defective in exonuclease III in the repair of apurinic sites generated by 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase I in vivo.     

Conformational Dynamics of DNA Repair by Escherichia coli Endonuclease III

Escherichia coli endonuclease III (Endo III or Nth) is a DNA glycosylase with a broad substrate specificity for oxidized or reduced pyrimidine bases. Endo III possesses two types of activities: N-glycosylase (hydrolysis of the N-glycosidic bond) and AP lyase (elimination of the 3′-phosphate of the AP-site). We report a pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of structural rearrangements of the DNA substrates and uncleavable ligands during their interaction with Endo III. Oligonucleotide duplexes containing 5,6-dihydrouracil, a natural abasic site, its tetrahydrofuran analog, and undamaged duplexes carried fluorescent DNA base analogs 2-aminopurine and 1,3-diaza-2-oxophenoxazine as environment-sensitive reporter groups. The results suggest that Endo III induces several fast sequential conformational changes in DNA during binding, lesion recognition, and adjustment to a catalytically competent conformation. A comparison of two fluorophores allowed us to distinguish between the events occurring in the damaged and undamaged DNA strand. Combining our data with the available structures of Endo III, we conclude that this glycosylase uses a multistep mechanism of damage recognition, which likely involves Gln⁴¹ and Leu⁸¹ as DNA lesion sensors.     

Characterisation of new substrate specificities of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae AP endonucleases

Despite the progress in understanding the base excision repair (BER) pathway it is still unclear why known mutants deficient in DNA glycosylases that remove oxidised bases are not sensitive to oxidising agents. One of the back-up repair pathways for oxidative DNA damage is the nucleotide incision repair (NIR) pathway initiated by two homologous AP endonucleases: the Nfo protein from Escherichia coli and Apn1 protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These endonucleases nick oxidatively damaged DNA in a DNA glycosylase-independent manner, providing the correct ends for DNA synthesis coupled to repair of the remaining 5′-dangling nucleotide. NIR provides an advantage compared to DNA glycosylase-mediated BER, because AP sites, very toxic DNA glycosylase products, do not form. Here, for the first time, we have characterised the substrate specificity of the Apn1 protein towards 5,6-dihydropyrimidine, 5-hydroxy-2′-deoxyuridine and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine deoxynucleotide. Detailed kinetic comparisons of Nfo, Apn1 and various DNA glycosylases using different DNA substrates were made. The apparent K_m and k_cat/K_m values of the reactions suggest that in vitro DNA glycosylase/AP lyase is somewhat more efficient than the AP endonuclease. However, in vivo, using cell-free extracts from paraquat-induced E.coli and from S.cerevisiae, we show that NIR is one of the major pathways for repair of oxidative DNA base damage.     

Enhanced activity of adenine-DNA glycosylase (Myh) by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (Ape1) in mammalian base excision repair of an A/GO mismatch

Adenine-DNA glycosylase MutY of Escherichia coli catalyzes the cleavage of adenine when mismatched with 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (GO), an oxidatively damaged base. The biological outcome is the prevention of C/G→A/T transversions. The molecular mechanism of base excision repair (BER) of A/GO in mammals is not well understood. In this study we report stimulation of mammalian adenine-DNA glycosylase activity by apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease using murine homolog of MutY (Myh) and human AP endonuclease (Ape1), which shares 94% amino acid identity with its murine homolog Apex. After removal of adenine by the Myh glycosylase activity, intact AP DNA remains due to lack of an efficient Myh AP lyase activity. The study of wild-type Ape1 and its catalytic mutant H309N demonstrates that Ape1 catalytic activity is required for formation of cleaved AP DNA. It also appears that Ape1 stimulates Myh glycosylase activity by increasing formation of the Myh–DNA complex. This stimulation is independent of the catalytic activity of Ape1. Consequently, Ape1 preserves the Myh preference for A/GO over A/G and improves overall glycosylase efficiency. Our study suggests that protein–protein interactions may occur in vivo to achieve efficient BER of A/GO.     

A novel uracil-DNA glycosylase family related to the helix-hairpin-helix DNA glycosylase superfamily

Cytosine bases can be deaminated spontaneously to uracil, causing DNA damage. Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), a ubiquitous uracil-excising enzyme found in bacteria and eukaryotes, is one of the enzymes that repair this kind of DNA damage. To date, no UDG-coding gene has been identified in Methanococcus jannaschii, although its entire genome was deciphered. Here, we have identified and characterized a novel UDG from M.jannaschii designated as MjUDG. It efficiently removed uracil from both single- and double-stranded DNA. MjUDG also catalyzes the excision of 8-oxoguanine from DNA. MjUDG has a helix–hairpin–helix motif and a [4Fe–4S]-binding cluster that is considered to be important for the DNA binding and catalytic activity. Although MjUDG shares these features with other structural families such as endonuclease III and mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase (MIG), unique conserved amino acids and substrate specificity distinguish MjUDG from other families. Also, a homologous member of MjUDG was identified in Aquifex aeolicus. We report that MjUDG belongs to a novel UDG family that has not been described to date.     

Alternative Excision Repair Pathways

Alternative excision repair (AER) is a category of excision repair initiated by a single nick, made by an endonuclease, near the site of DNA damage, and followed by excision of the damaged DNA, repair synthesis, and ligation. The ultraviolet (UV) damage endonuclease in fungi and bacteria introduces a nick immediately 5′ to various types of UV damage and initiates its excision repair that is independent of nucleotide excision repair (NER). Endo IV-type apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases from Escherichia coli and yeast and human Exo III-type AP endonuclease APEX1 introduce a nick directly and immediately 5′ to various types of oxidative base damage besides the AP site, initiating excision repair. Another endonuclease, endonuclease V from bacteria to humans, binds deaminated bases and cleaves the phosphodiester bond located 1 nucleotide 3′ of the base, leading to excision repair. A single-strand break in DNA is one of the most frequent types of DNA damage within cells and is repaired efficiently. AER makes use of such repair capability of single-strand breaks, removes DNA damage, and has an important role in complementing BER and NER.NER and base excision repair (BER) are the major excision repair pathways present in almost all organisms. In NER, dual incisions are introduced, the damaged DNA between the incised sites is then removed, and DNA synthesis fills the single-stranded gap, followed by ligation. In BER, an AP site, formed by depurination or created by a base damage-specific DNA glycosylase, is recognized by an AP endonuclease that introduces a nick immediately 5′ to the AP site, followed by repair synthesis, removal of the AP site, and final ligation. Besides these two fundamental excision repair systems, investigators have found another category of excision repair—AER—an example of which is the excision repair of UV damage, initiated by an endonuclease called UV damage endonuclease (UVDE). UVDE introduces a single nick immediately 5′ to various types of UV lesions as well as other types of base damage, and this nick leads to the removal of the lesions by an AER process designated as UVDE-mediated excision repair (UVER or UVDR). Genetic analysis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe indicates that UVER provides cells with an extremely rapid removal of UV lesions, which is important for cells exposed to UV in their growing phase.Endo IV–type AP endonucleases from Escherichia coli and budding yeast and the Exo III–type human AP endonuclease APEX1 are able to introduce a nick at various types of oxidative base damage and initiate a form of excision repair that has been designated as nucleotide incision repair (NIR). Endonuclease V (ENDOV) from bacteria to humans recognizes deaminated bases, introduces a nick 1 nucleotide 3′ of the base, and leads to excision repair initiated by the nick. These endonucleases introduce a single nick near the DNA-damage site, leaving 3′-OH termini, and initiate repair of both the DNA damage and the nick. The mechanisms of AER may be similar to those of single-strand break (SSB) repair or BER except for the initial nicking process. However, how DNA damage is recognized determines the repair process within the cell. This article discusses the mechanisms and functional roles of AER. We begin with AER of UV damage, because genetic analysis has shown functional differences between this AER and NER in S. pombe.     

Pol β associated complex and base excision repair factors in mouse fibroblasts

During mammalian base excision repair (BER) of lesion-containing DNA, it is proposed that toxic strand-break intermediates generated throughout the pathway are sequestered and passed from one step to the next until repair is complete. This stepwise process is termed substrate channeling. A working model evaluated here is that a complex of BER factors may facilitate the BER process. FLAG-tagged DNA polymerase (pol) β was expressed in mouse fibroblasts carrying a deletion in the endogenous pol β gene, and the cell extract was subjected to an ‘affinity-capture’ procedure using anti-FLAG antibody. The pol β affinity-capture fraction (ACF) was found to contain several BER factors including polymerase-1, X-ray cross-complementing factor1-DNA ligase III and enzymes involved in processing 3′-blocked ends of BER intermediates, e.g. polynucleotide kinase and tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1. In contrast, DNA glycosylases, apurinic/aprymidinic endonuclease 1 and flap endonuclease 1 and several other factors involved in BER were not present. Some of the BER factors in the pol β ACF were in a multi-protein complex as observed by sucrose gradient centrifugation. The pol β ACF was capable of substrate channeling for steps in vitro BER and was proficient in in vitro repair of substrates mimicking a 3′-blocked topoisomerase I covalent intermediate or an oxidative stress-induced 3′-blocked intermediate.     

Excision of formamidopyrimidine lesions by endonucleases III and VIII is not a major DNA repair pathway in Escherichia coli

Proper maintenance of the genome is of great importance. Consequently, damaged nucleotides are repaired through redundant pathways. We considered whether the genome is protected from formamidopyrimidine nucleosides (Fapy•dA, Fapy•dG) via a pathway distinct from the Escherichia coli guanine oxidation system. The formamidopyrimidines are produced in significant quantities in DNA as a result of oxidative stress and are efficiently excised by formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase. Previous reports suggest that the formamidopyrimidine nucleosides are substrates for endonucleases III and VIII, enzymes that are typically associated with pyrimidine lesion repair in E.coli. We investigated the possibility that Endo III and/or Endo VIII play a role in formamidopyrimidine nucleoside repair by examining Fapy•dA and Fapy•dG excision opposite all four native 2′-deoxyribonucleotides. Endo VIII excises both lesions more efficiently than does Endo III, but the enzymes exhibit similar selectivity with respect to their action on duplexes containing the formamidopyrimidines opposite native deoxyribonucleotides. Fapy•dA is removed more rapidly than Fapy•dG, and duplexes containing purine nucleotides opposite the lesions are superior substrates compared with those containing formamidopyrimidine–pyrimidine base pairs. This dependence upon opposing nucleotide indicates that Endo III and Endo VIII do not serve as back up enzymes to formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase in the repair of formamidopyrimidines. When considered in conjunction with cellular studies [J. O. Blaisdell, Z. Hatahet and S. S. Wallace (1999) J. Bacteriol., 181, 6396–6402], these results also suggest that Endo III and Endo VIII do not protect E.coli against possible mutations attributable to formamidopyrimidine lesions.     

Caught in motion: human NTHL1 undergoes interdomain rearrangement necessary for catalysis

Base excision repair (BER) is the main pathway protecting cells from the continuous damage to DNA inflicted by reactive oxygen species. BER is initiated by DNA glycosylases, each of which repairs a particular class of base damage. NTHL1, a bifunctional DNA glycosylase, possesses both glycolytic and β-lytic activities with a preference for oxidized pyrimidine substrates. Defects in human NTHL1 drive a class of polyposis colorectal cancer. We report the first X-ray crystal structure of hNTHL1, revealing an open conformation not previously observed in the bacterial orthologs. In this conformation, the six-helical barrel domain comprising the helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) DNA binding motif is tipped away from the iron sulphur cluster-containing domain, requiring a conformational change to assemble a catalytic site upon DNA binding. We found that the flexibility of hNTHL1 and its ability to adopt an open configuration can be attributed to an interdomain linker. Swapping the human linker sequence for that of Escherichia coli yielded a protein chimera that crystallized in a closed conformation and had a reduced activity on lesion-containing DNA. This large scale interdomain rearrangement during catalysis is unprecedented for a HhH superfamily DNA glycosylase and provides important insight into the molecular mechanism of hNTHL1.     

DNA base excision repair activities and pathway function in mitochondrial and cellular lysates from cells lacking mitochondrial DNA

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) contains higher steady-state levels of oxidative damage and mutates at rates significantly greater than nuclear DNA. Oxidative lesions in mtDNA are removed by a base excision repair (BER) pathway. All mtDNA repair proteins are nuclear encoded and imported. Most mtDNA repair proteins so far discovered are either identical to nuclear DNA repair proteins or isoforms of nuclear proteins arising from differential splicing. Regulation of mitochondrial BER is therefore not expected to be independent of nuclear BER, though the extent to which mitochondrial BER is regulated with respect to mtDNA amount or damage is largely unknown. Here we have measured DNA BER activities in lysates of mitochondria isolated from human 143B TK^– osteosarcoma cells that had been depleted of mtDNA (ρ⁰) or not (wt). Despite the total absence of mtDNA in the ρ⁰ cells, a complete mitochondrial BER pathway was present, as demonstrated using an in vitro assay with synthetic oligonucleotides. Measurement of individual BER protein activities in mitochondrial lysates indicated that some BER activities are insensitive to the lack of mtDNA. Uracil and 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase activities were relatively insensitive to the absence of mtDNA, only about 25% reduced in ρ⁰ relative to wt cells. Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease and polymerase γ activities were more affected, 65 and 45% lower, respectively, in ρ⁰ mitochondria. Overall BER activity in lysates was also about 65% reduced in ρ⁰ mitochondria. To identify the limiting deficiencies in BER of ρ⁰ mitochondria we supplemented the BER assay of mitochondrial lysates with pure uracil DNA glycosylase, AP endonuclease and/or the catalytic subunit of polymerase γ. BER activity was stimulated by addition of uracil DNA glycosylase and polymerase γ. However, no addition or combination of additions stimulated BER activity to wt levels. This suggests that an unknown activity, factor or interaction important in BER is deficient in ρ⁰ mitochondria. While nuclear BER protein levels and activities were generally not altered in ρ⁰ cells, AP endonuclease activity was substantially reduced in nuclear and in whole cell extracts. This appeared to be due to reduced endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in ρ⁰ cells, and not a general dysfunction of ρ⁰ cells, as exposure of cells to ROS rapidly stimulated increases in AP endonuclease activities and APE1 protein levels.     

Chemical synthesis and translesion replication of a cis-syn cyclobutane thymine-uracil dimer

The cytosine base in DNA undergoes hydrolytic deamination at a considerable rate when UV radiation induces formation of a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) with an adjacent pyrimidine base. We have synthesized a phosphoramidite building block of a cis–syn cyclobutane thymine–uracil dimer (T[]U), which is the deaminated form of the CPD at a TC site, and incorporated it into oligodeoxyribonucleotides. The previously reported method for synthesis of the thymine dimer (T[]T) was applied, using partially protected thymidylyl-(3′–5′)-2′-deoxyuridine as the starting material, and after triplet- sensitized irradiation, the configuration of the base moiety in the major product was determined by NMR spectroscopy. Presence of the cis–syn cyclobutane dimer in the obtained oligonucleotides was confirmed by UV photoreversal and reaction with T4 endonuclease V. Using a 30mer containing T[]U, translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase η was analyzed. There was no difference in the results between the templates containing T[]T and T[]U and pol η bypassed both lesions with the same efficiency, incorporating two adenylates. This enzyme showed fidelity to base pair formation, but this replication causes a C→T transition because the original sequence is TC.     

Identification of 5-formyluracil DNA glycosylase activity of human hNTH1 protein

5-Formyluracil (5-foU) is a potentially mutagenic lesion of thymine produced in DNA by ionizing radiation and various chemical oxidants. The elucidation of repair mechanisms for 5-foU will yield important insights into the biological consequences of the lesion. Recently, we reported that 5-foU is recognized and removed from DNA by Escherichia coli enzymes Nth (endonuclease III), Nei (endonuclease VIII) and MutM (formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase). Human cells have been shown to have enzymatic activities that release 5-foU from X-ray-irradiated DNA, but the molecular identities of these activities are not yet known. In this study, we demonstrate that human hNTH1 (endonuclease III homolog) has a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase activity that recognizes 5-foU in DNA and removes it. hNTH1 cleaved 5-foU-containing duplex oligonucleotides via a β-elimination reaction. It formed Schiff base intermediates with 5-foU-containing oligonucleotides. Furthermore, hNTH1 cleaved duplex oligonucleotides containing all of the 5-foU/N pairs (N = G, A, T or C). The specific activities of hNTH1 for cleavage of oligonucleotides containing 5-foU and thymine glycol were 0.011 and 0.045 nM/min/ng protein, respectively. These results indicate that hNTH1 has DNA glycosylase activity with the potential to recognize 5-foU in DNA and remove it in human cells.     

Escherichia coli Nth and human hNTH1 DNA glycosylases are involved in removal of 8-oxoguanine from 8-oxoguanine/guanine mispairs in DNA

The spectrum of DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species includes a wide variety of modifications of purine and pyrimidine bases. Among these modified bases, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is an important mutagenic lesion. Base excision repair is a critical mechanism for preventing mutations by removing the oxidative lesion from the DNA. That the spontaneous mutation frequency of the Escherichia coli mutT mutant is much higher than that of the mutM or mutY mutant indicates a significant potential for mutation due to 8-oxoG incorporation opposite A and G during DNA replication. In fact, the removal of A and G in such a situation by MutY protein would fix rather than prevent mutation. This suggests the need for differential removal of 8-oxoG when incorporated into DNA, versus being generated in situ. In this study we demonstrate that E.coli Nth protein (endonuclease III) has an 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase/AP lyase activity which removes 8-oxoG preferentially from 8-oxoG/G mispairs. The MutM and Nei proteins are also capable of removing 8-oxoG from mispairs. The frequency of spontaneous G:C→C:G transversions was significantly increased in E.coli CC103mutMnthnei mutants compared with wild-type, mutM, nth, nei, mutMnei, mutMnth and nthnei strains. From these results it is concluded that Nth protein, together with the MutM and Nei proteins, is involved in the repair of 8-oxoG when it is incorporated opposite G. Furthermore, we found that human hNTH1 protein, a homolog of E.coli Nth protein, has similar DNA glycosylase/AP lyase activity that removes 8-oxoG from 8-oxoG/G mispairs.     

Evidence for Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana

Chloroplasts are the sites of photosynthesis in plants, and they contain their own multicopy, requisite genome. Chloroplasts are also major sites for production of reactive oxygen species, which can damage essential components of the chloroplast, including the chloroplast genome. Compared with mitochondria in animals, relatively little is known about the potential to repair oxidative DNA damage in chloroplasts. Here we provide evidence of DNA glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity involved in base excision repair of oxidized pyrimidines in chloroplast protein extracts of Arabidopsis thaliana. Three base excision repair components (two endonuclease III homologs and an apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease) that might account for this activity were identified by bioinformatics. Transient expression of protein-green fluorescent protein fusions showed that all three are targeted to the chloroplast and co-localized with chloroplast DNA in nucleoids. The glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity of one of the endonuclease III homologs, AtNTH2, which had not previously been characterized, was confirmed in vitro. T-DNA insertions in each of these genes were identified, and the physiological and biochemical phenotypes of the single, double, and triple mutants were analyzed. This mutant analysis revealed the presence of a third glycosylase activity and potentially another pathway for repair of oxidative DNA damage in chloroplasts.Reactive oxygen species (ROS)² are inevitable by-products of metabolism in all aerobic organisms (1). Plants and algae are especially prone to photo-oxidative stress because of ROS generated during oxygenic photosynthesis. Several types of ROS are generated at various sites in the photosynthetic electron transport chain in chloroplasts, and their production is enhanced by such factors as excess or varying light intensities and extremes of temperature, drought, nutrient deficiencies, and herbicides (2). These ROS can damage many chloroplast constituents, including lipids, proteins, pigments, and the multicopy genome.Plants have evolved numerous mechanisms to deal with photo-oxidative stress, including dissipation of excess light energy, synthesis of antioxidant molecules and scavenging enzymes, and targeted repair (2). DNA repair of oxidized bases, such as thymine glycol (TG) or 8-oxoguanine, can be hypothesized as an important element of chloroplast photoprotection. Although there is considerable overlap in both the types of DNA lesions caused by different insults and the targeting of different DNA repair mechanisms, base excision repair (BER) is considered to be the main repair pathway for oxidative DNA damage, at least in the nucleus and mitochondrion (3, 4).BER repairs single damaged bases (because of oxidation, deamination, alkylation, etc.) in DNA by removing them, breaking the phosphodiester backbone, excising the sugar residue at the abasic site, and filling the gap (reviewed in Refs. 5, 6). BER begins with a DNA glycosylase or glycosylase-lyase. There are many types of glycosylases in any given organism and across taxa, and they are distinguishable by their substrate specificity, whether they are monofunctional (glycosylase activity only) or bifunctional (glycosylase plus apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase activities; see below), by the phylogenetic family in which they reside, and/or by conserved structural characteristics (reviewed in Refs. 6–8). The glycosylases involved in BER of oxidative DNA damage can be roughly divided into those that target either oxidized purines or oxidized pyrimidines (4, 9). For example, TG is a common type of oxidized pyrimidine, which is removed primarily by endonuclease III (Nth), endonuclease VIII (Nei), or their homologs (10). TG is only poorly mutagenic, but it strongly blocks polymerases, inducing cell cycle arrest and potentially cell death if it is not removed.After an appropriate glycosylase cleaves the N-glycosyl bond attaching a damaged base to deoxyribose, leaving an abasic site, the sugar-phosphate backbone is nicked. Bifunctional glycosylases also have an AP lyase activity that cleaves on the 3′ side of the AP site. However, the site still requires the function of a separate AP endonuclease that cuts on the 5′ side of the AP site to remove the 3′-deoxyribose residue at the nick site (11) before repair can continue. In the case of a monofunctional glycosylase, an AP endonuclease nicks the strand on the 5′ side of the AP site. Escherichia coli has two unrelated AP endonucleases, exonuclease III (Xth) and endonuclease IV (Nfo). In humans Ape1/Ref-1 is an Xth homolog, and in yeast Apn1p is an Nfo homolog (5, 12). Following generation of the AP site and nicking of the backbone, the gap is filled by a polymerase in either a short or long patch and then sealed by a ligase.BER of oxidative DNA lesions such TG has been studied intensively in E. coli, yeast, and mammals, whereas comparatively little is known about BER in plants. For example, only two genes involved in BER of oxidized pyrimidines have been characterized previously in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (13, 14), and their localization within the plant cell is unknown. An Nth homolog in Arabidopsis, AtNTH1 (At2g31450), has the expected bifunctional glycosylase-lyase activity in vitro (14). The ARP gene (At2g41460) in Arabidopsis encodes an enzyme with AP endonuclease activity (13).Here we present the results of experiments conducted to address whether there is BER of oxidized pyrimidines in the Arabidopsis chloroplast. Chloroplast protein extracts were assayed for glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity. The chloroplast localization of ARP, AtNTH1, and AtNTH2, a second Arabidopsis homolog of Nth, was tested experimentally, and the predicted activity of AtNTH2 was confirmed in vitro. In addition, an analysis of T-DNA insertion mutants affecting each of these three BER genes was performed.     

Excision of 8-oxoguanine within clustered damage by the yeast OGG1 protein

Clustered damages are formed in DNA by ionising radiation and radiomimetic anticancer agents and are thought to be biologically severe. 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a major DNA damage resulting from oxidative attack, is highly mutagenic leading to a high level of G·C→T·A transversions if not previously excised by OGG1 DNA glycosylase/AP lyase proteins in eukaryotes. However, 8-oxoG within clustered DNA damage may present a challenge to the repair machinery of the cell. The ability of yeast OGG1 to excise 8-oxoG was determined when another type of damage [dihydrothymine, uracil, 8-oxoG, abasic (AP) site or various types of single-strand breaks (SSBs)] is present on the complementary strand 1, 3 or 5 bases 5′ or 3′ opposite to 8-oxoG. Base damages have little or no influence on the excision of 8-oxoG by yeast OGG1 (yOGG1) whereas an AP site has a strong inhibitory effect. Various types of SSBs, obtained using either oligonucleotides with 3′- and 5′-phosphate termini around a gap or through conversion of an AP site with either endonuclease III or human AP endonuclease 1, strongly inhibit excision of 8-oxoG by yOGG1. Therefore, this large inhibitory effect of an AP site or a SSB may minimise the probability of formation of a double-strand break in the processing of 8-oxoG within clustered damages.     

N-terminus of the rat adenine glycosylase MYH affects excision rates and processing of MYH-generated abasic sites

Repair of most modified and mispaired bases in the genome is initiated by DNA glycosylases, which bind to their respective targets and cleave the N-glycosyl bond to initiate base excision repair (BER). The mammalian homolog of the Escherichia coli MutY DNA glycosylase (MYH) cleaves adenine residues paired with either oxidized or non-modified guanines. MYH is crucial for the avoidance of mutations resulting from oxidative DNA damage. Multiple N-terminal splice variants of MYH exist in mammalian cells and it is likely that different variants result in the production of enzymes with altered properties. To investigate whether modifications in the N-terminus are consequential to MYH function, we overexpressed intact and N-terminal-deletion rat MYH proteins and examined their activities. We found that deletion of 75 amino acids, which perturbs the catalytic core that is conserved with E.coli MutY, abolished excision activity. In contrast, deletions limited to the extended mammalian N-terminal domain, differentially influenced steady-state excision rates. Notably, deletion of 50 amino acids resulted in an enzyme with a significantly lower K_m favoring formation of excision products with 3′-OH termini. Our findings suggest that MYH isoforms divergent in the N-terminus influence excision rates and processing of abasic sites.     

Novel repair activities of AlkA (3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II) and endonuclease VIII for xanthine and oxanine,guanine lesions induced by nitric oxide and nitrous acid

Nitrosation of guanine in DNA by nitrogen oxides such as nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous acid leads to formation of xanthine (Xan) and oxanine (Oxa), potentially cytotoxic and mutagenic lesions. In the present study, we have examined the repair capacity of DNA N-glycosylases from Escherichia coli for Xan and Oxa. The nicking assay with the defined substrates containing Xan and Oxa revealed that AlkA [in combination with endonuclease (Endo) IV] and Endo VIII recognized Xan in the tested enzymes. The activity (V_max/K_m) of AlkA for Xan was 5-fold lower than that for 7-methylguanine, and that of Endo VIII was 50-fold lower than that for thymine glycol. The activity of AlkA and Endo VIII for Xan was further substantiated by the release of [³H]Xan from the substrate. The treatment of E.coli with N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine increased the Xan-excising activity in the cell extract from alkA⁺ but not alkA^– strains. The alkA and nei (the Endo VIII gene) double mutant, but not the single mutants, exhibited increased sensitivity to nitrous acid relative to the wild type strain. AlkA and Endo VIII also exhibited excision activity for Oxa, but the activity was much lower than that for Xan.