Vesicle priming and depriming: a SNAP decision

Synapses have a limited pool of vesicles that are docked and primed for rapid release. In neuroendocrine cells, splice variants of the SNARE protein SNAP-25 and phosphorylation of SNAP-25 independently influence the size of the releasable vesicle pool, possibly by altering the rate of vesicle depriming. Pre- and posttranslational modifications of SNAP-25 may therefore affect synaptic strength.     

Vesicle pools, docking, priming, and release

The release of neurotransmitter from synaptic vesicles represents the final event by which presynapses send their chemical signal to the receiving postsynapses. Prior to fusion, synaptic vesicles undergo a series of maturation events, most notably the membrane-delimited docking and priming steps. Physiological and optical experiments with high-time resolution have allowed the distinction of vesicles in different maturation states with respect to fusion, the so-called vesicle pools. In this review, we define the various vesicle pools and discuss pathways leading into and out of these pools. We also provide an overview of an array of proteins that have been identified or are speculated to play a role in the transition between the various vesicle pools.Work in the lab of the authors is supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the European Community and by local funding (HOMFOR).     

Vesicle trafficking: a Rab family profile

A new tool-kit has been developed for profiling expression and function of?Rab?GTPases on a genome-wide scale. Use of this tool-kit has revealed unexpectedly that at least half of Drosophila Rabs have neuronal-specific expression patterns and localize to synapses.     

Shear-Induced Migration of a Transmembrane Protein within a Vesicle

Biomembranes feature phospholipid bilayers and serve as the interface between cells or organelles and the extracellular and/or cellular environment. Lipids can move freely throughout the membrane; the lipid bilayer behaves like a fluid. Such fluidity is important in terms of the actions of membrane transport proteins, which often mediate biological functions; membrane protein motion has attracted a great deal of attention. Because the proteins are small, diffusion phenomena are often in play, but flow-induced transport has rarely been addressed. Here, we used a dissipative particle dynamics approach to investigate flow-induced membrane protein transport. We analyzed the drift of a membrane protein located within a vesicle. Under the influence of shear flow, the protein gradually migrated toward the vorticity axis via a random walk, and the probability of retention around the axis was high. To understand the mechanism of protein migration, we varied both shear strength and protein size. Protein migration was induced by the balance between the drag and thermodynamic diffusion forces and could be represented by the Péclet number. These results improve our understanding of flow-induced membrane protein transport.     

Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis

Presynaptic nerve terminals release neurotransmitters by synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Membrane fusion mediating synaptic exocytosis and other intracellular membrane traffic is affected by a universal machinery that includes SNARE (for “soluble NSF-attachment protein receptor”) and SM (for “Sec1/Munc18-like”) proteins. During fusion, vesicular and target SNARE proteins assemble into an α-helical trans-SNARE complex that forces the two membranes tightly together, and SM proteins likely wrap around assembling trans-SNARE complexes to catalyze membrane fusion. After fusion, SNARE complexes are dissociated by the ATPase NSF (for “N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor”). Fusion-competent conformations of SNARE proteins are maintained by chaperone complexes composed of CSPα, Hsc70, and SGT, and by nonenzymatically acting synuclein chaperones; dysfunction of these chaperones results in neurodegeneration. The synaptic membrane-fusion machinery is controlled by synaptotagmin, and additionally regulated by a presynaptic protein matrix (the “active zone”) that includes Munc13 and RIM proteins as central components.Synaptic vesicles are uniform organelles of ∼40 nm diameter that constitute the central organelle for neurotransmitter release. Each presynaptic nerve terminal contains hundreds of synaptic vesicles that are filled with neurotransmitters. When an action potential depolarizes the presynaptic plasma membrane, Ca²⁺-channels open, and Ca²⁺ flows into the nerve terminal to trigger the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, thereby releasing their neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft (Fig. 1). Ca²⁺ triggers exocytosis by binding to synaptotagmin; after exocytosis, vesicles are re-endocytosed, recycled, and refilled with neurotransmitters. Recycling can occur by multiple parallel pathways, either by fast recycling via local reuse of vesicles (“kiss-and-run” and “kiss-and-stay”), or by slower recycling via an endosomal intermediate (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The synaptic vesicle cycle. A presynaptic nerve terminal is depicted schematically as it contacts a postsynaptic neuron. The synaptic vesicle cycle consists of exocytosis (red arrows) followed by endocytosis and recycling (yellow arrows). Synaptic vesicles (green circles) are filled with neurotransmitters (NT; red dots) by active transport (neurotransmitter uptake) fueled by an electrochemical gradient established by a proton pump that acidifies the vesicle interior (vesicle acidification; green background). In preparation to synaptic exocytosis, synaptic vesicles are docked at the active zone, and primed by an ATP-dependent process that renders the vesicles competent to respond to a Ca²⁺-signal. When an action potential depolarizes the presynaptic membrane, Ca²⁺-channels open, causing a local increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ at the active zone that triggers completion of the fusion reaction. Released neurotransmitters then bind to receptors associated with the postsynaptic density (PSD). After fusion pore opening, synaptic vesicles probably recycle via three alternative pathways: local refilling with neurotransmitters without undocking (“kiss-and-stay”), local recycling with undocking (“kiss-and-run”), and full recycling of vesicles with passage through an endosomal intermediate. (Adapted from Südhof 2004.)Due to their small size, synaptic vesicles contain a limited complement of proteins that have been described in detail (Südhof 2004; Takamori et al. 2006). Although the functions of several vesicle components remain to be identified, most vesicle components participate in one of three processes: neurotransmitter uptake and storage, vesicle exocytosis, and vesicle endocytosis and recycling. In addition, it is likely that at least some vesicle proteins are involved in the biogenesis of synaptic vesicles and the maintenance of their exquisite uniformity and stability, but little is known about how vesicles are made, and what determines their size.     

Secretory Vesicle Pools and Rate and Kinetics of Single Vesicle Exocytosis in Neurosecretory Cells

Secretory vesicles are localized in specific compartments within neurosecretory cells. Morphometric, cytochemical and electrophysiological techniques have allowed the definition of secretory vesicle compartments. These are different pools in which vesicles are in various states of releasability. The transit of vesicles between compartments is not random, but an event controlled and regulated by Ca²⁺ and the cortical F-actin network. Cortical F-actin disassembly, a Ca²⁺-dependent event, controls the transit of secretory vesicles from the reserve compartment to the release-ready vesicle pool. Furthermore, the recent development of new technical approaches (patch-clamp membrane capacitance, electrochemical detection of amines with carbon-fibre microelectrodes) has now permitted us to understand the kinetics of single vesicle exocytosis.     

Trans-generational immune priming in a social insect

Detecting functional homology between invertebrate and vertebrate immunity is of interest in terms of understanding the dynamics and evolution of immune systems. Trans-generational effects on immunity are well known from vertebrates, but their existence in invertebrates remains controversial. Earlier work on invertebrates has interpreted increased offspring resistance to pathogens as trans-generational immune priming. However, interpretation of these earlier studies involves some caveats and thus full evidence for a direct effect of maternal immune experience on offspring immunity is still lacking in invertebrates. Here we show that induced levels of antibacterial activity are higher in the worker offspring of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris L. when their mother queen received a corresponding immune challenge prior to colony founding. This shows trans-generational immune priming in an insect, with ramifications for the evolution of sociality.     

Negative priming in a joint selection task

Recent studies have suggested that the observation of another individual executing a movement activates representations of the observed movement in the observer. These representations are thought to be used by other systems to facilitate a variety of social cognitive processes, such as social searches. Previous research on social searches has primarily involved contexts where targets were presented in isolation. Typical environments, however, contain targets and non-targets and one must select the correct information for task completion. To gain insight into the processes underlying social searches, participants completed negative priming tasks alone and in pairs. Results indicated that there were no differences in the negative priming effects resulting from the participants observed or performed the preceding selection task. Further, the correlations between individual and joint negative priming suggest that similar processes were activated on these tasks. The findings support the co-representation hypothesis and provide insight into the processes underlying selection in individual and social settings.     

Vesicle trafficking in plant immune responses

In plants, perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns at the surface is the first line of defence in cellular immunity. This review summarizes recent evidence of the involvement of vesicle trafficking in the plant's immune response against pathogens. I first discuss aspects of ligand-stimulated receptor endocytosis. The best-characterized pattern-recognition receptor (PRR), FLS2, is a transmembrane leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that recognizes bacterial flagellin. FLS2 was recently shown to undergo internalization upon activation with its cognate ligand. An animal PRR, TLR4 that mediates perception of bacterial-derived lipopolysaccharides, similarly exhibits ligand-stimulated endocytosis. The second focus is N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor adaptor protein receptor (SNARE)-mediated immunity involving syntaxins and their cognate partners. One of the genes involved in basal immunity in Arabidopsis, PEN1, encodes a syntaxin that focally accumulates at fungal penetration sites, raising the possibility that induced exocytosis is important for active defence. Pathogen-triggered endocytic and exocytic processes have to be balanced to ensure host cell homeostasis. Thus, understanding how phytopathogens have evolved strategies to exploit host cell vesicle trafficking to manipulate immune responses is currently an area of intense study.     

Vesicle formation in the Golgi apparatus

In this paper we examine the mechanics of vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus. We propose a model for this process based on the notion that molecular surfactants can release the elastic energy stored in the lipid bilayer. The same physical process may drive other vesiculation processes, including coated vesicle formation and budding of enveloped viruses from the plasma membrane.     

Pore Formation in a Binary Giant Vesicle Induced by Cone-Shaped Lipids

We have investigated shape deformations of binary giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) composed of cone- and cylinder-shaped lipids. By coupling the spontaneous curvature of lipids with the phase separation, we demonstrated pore opening and closing in GUVs. When the temperature was set below the chain melting transition temperature of the cylinder-shaped lipid, the GUVs burst and then formed a single large pore, where the cone shape lipids form a cap at the edge of the bilayer to stabilize the pore. The pore closed when we increased the temperature above the transition temperature. The pore showed three types of shapes depending on the cone-shaped lipid concentration: simple circular, rolled-rim, and wrinkled-rim pores. These pore shape changes indicate that the distribution of the cone- and cylinder-shaped lipids is asymmetric between the inner and outer leaflets in the bilayer. We have proposed a theoretical model for a two-component membrane with an edge of bilayer where lipids can transfer between two leaflets. Using this model, we have reproduced numerically the observed shape deformations at the rim of pore.     

Vesicle mobility studied in cultured astrocytes

Astrocytes release many neuroactive substances, which are stored in membrane bound vesicles and may play a role in synapse modulation and in the coupling between neuronal activity and the local blood flow. However, the mobility of these vesicles in astrocytes has not been studied yet. We here used a fluorescently tagged proatrial natriuretic peptide to label single vesicles and dynamic microscopy to monitor their mobility. To track and analyze labeled vesicles, we employed a computer software. We found two modes of vesicle mobility, directional and non-directional. The mobility of non-directional vesicles is likely determined mainly by free diffusion. Only directional vesicles displayed a straight-line motion. The relationship of mean square displacement with time in directional vesicles resembled a quadratic function, indicating that in addition to free diffusion other mechanisms may contribute to vesicle movements in astrocytes, the biophysical properties of which are similar to those of neurons.     

Synapse-Assembly Proteins Maintain Synaptic Vesicle Cluster Stability and Regulate Synaptic Vesicle Transport in Caenorhabditis elegans

The functional integrity of neurons requires the bidirectional active transport of synaptic vesicles (SVs) in axons. The kinesin motor KIF1A transports SVs from somas to stable SV clusters at synapses, while dynein moves them in the opposite direction. However, it is unclear how SV transport is regulated and how SVs at clusters interact with motor proteins. We addressed these questions by isolating a rare temperature-sensitive allele of Caenorhabditis elegans unc-104 (KIF1A) that allowed us to manipulate SV levels in axons and dendrites. Growth at 20° and 14° resulted in locomotion rates that were ∼3 and 50% of wild type, respectively, with similar effects on axonal SV levels. Corresponding with the loss of SVs from axons, mutants grown at 14° and 20° showed a 10- and 24-fold dynein-dependent accumulation of SVs in their dendrites. Mutants grown at 14° and switched to 25° showed an abrupt irreversible 50% decrease in locomotion and a 50% loss of SVs from the synaptic region 12-hr post-shift, with no further decreases at later time points, suggesting that the remaining clustered SVs are stable and resistant to retrograde removal by dynein. The data further showed that the synapse-assembly proteins SYD-1, SYD-2, and SAD-1 protected SV clusters from degradation by motor proteins. In syd-1, syd-2, and sad-1 mutants, SVs accumulate in an UNC-104-dependent manner in the distal axon region that normally lacks SVs. In addition to their roles in SV cluster stability, all three proteins also regulate SV transport.     

The Vesicle Protein SAM-4 Regulates the Processivity of Synaptic Vesicle Transport

Axonal transport of synaptic vesicles (SVs) is a KIF1A/UNC-104 mediated process critical for synapse development and maintenance yet little is known of how SV transport is regulated. Using C. elegans as an in vivo model, we identified SAM-4 as a novel conserved vesicular component regulating SV transport. Processivity, but not velocity, of SV transport was reduced in sam-4 mutants. sam-4 displayed strong genetic interactions with mutations in the cargo binding but not the motor domain of unc-104. Gain-of-function mutations in the unc-104 motor domain, identified in this study, suppress the sam-4 defects by increasing processivity of the SV transport. Genetic analyses suggest that SAM-4, SYD-2/liprin-α and the KIF1A/UNC-104 motor function in the same pathway to regulate SV transport. Our data support a model in which the SV protein SAM-4 regulates the processivity of SV transport.     

The heavy chain of conventional kinesin interacts with the SNARE proteins SNAP25 and SNAP23

Recent studies on the conventional motor protein kinesin have identified a putative cargo-binding domain (residues 827-906) within the heavy chain. To identify possible cargo proteins which bind to this kinesin domain, we employed a yeast two-hybrid assay. A human brain cDNA library was screened, using as bait residues 814-963 of human ubiquitous kinesin heavy chain. This screen initially identified synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP25) as a kinesin-binding protein. Subsequently, synaptosome-associated protein of 23 kDa (SNAP23), the nonneuronal homologue of SNAP25, was also confirmed to interact with kinesin. The sites of interaction, determined from in vivo and in vitro assays, are the N-terminus of SNAP25 (residues 1-84) and the cargo-binding domain of kinesin heavy chain (residues 814-907). Both regions are composed almost entirely of heptad repeats, suggesting the interaction between heavy chain and SNAP25 is that of a coiled-coil. The observation that SNAP23 also binds to residues 814-907 of heavy chain would indicate that the minimal kinesin-binding domain of SNAP23 and SNAP25 is most likely residues 45-84 (SNAP25 numbering), a heptad-repeat region in both proteins. The major binding site for kinesin light chain in kinesin heavy chain was mapped to residues 789-813 at the C-terminal end of the heavy chain stalk domain. Weak binding of light chain was also detected at the N-terminus of the heavy chain tail domain (residues 814-854). In support of separate binding sites on heavy chain for light chain and SNAPs, a complex of heavy and light chains was observed to interact with SNAP25 and SNAP23.