Deregulated Ras signaling compromises DNA damage checkpoint recovery in S. cerevisiae

The DNA damage checkpoint maintains genome stability by arresting the cell cycle and promoting DNA repair under genotoxic stress. Cells must downregulate the checkpoint signaling pathways in order to resume cell division after completing DNA repair. While the mechanisms of checkpoint activation have been well-characterized, the process of checkpoint recovery, and the signals regulating it, has only recently been investigated. We have identified a new role for the Ras signaling pathway as a regulator of DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Here we report that in budding yeast, deletion of the IRA1 and IRA2 genes encoding negative regulators of Ras prevents cellular recovery from a DNA damage induced arrest. The checkpoint kinase Rad53 is dephosphorylated in an IRA-deficient strain, indicating that recovery failure is not caused by constitutive checkpoint pathway activation. The ira1D ira2D recovery defect requires the checkpoint kinase Chk1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) catalytic subunit Tpk2. Furthermore, PKA phosphorylation sites on the anaphase promoting complex specificity factor Cdc20 are required for the recovery defect, indicating a link between the recovery defect and PKA regulation of mitosis. This work identifies a new signaling pathway that can regulate DNA damage checkpoint recovery, and implicates the Ras signaling pathway as an important regulator of mitotic events.     

C. elegans RAD-5/CLK-2 defines a new DNA damage checkpoint protein

Background: In response to genotoxic stress, cells activate checkpoint pathways that lead to a transient cell cycle arrest that allows for DNA repair or to apoptosis, which triggers the demise of genetically damaged cells.Results: During positional cloning of the C. elegans rad-5 DNA damage checkpoint gene, we found, surprisingly, that rad-5(mn159) is allelic with clk-2(qm37), a mutant previously implicated in regulation of biological rhythms and life span. However, clk-2(qm37) is the only C. elegans clock mutant that is defective for the DNA damage checkpoint. We show that rad-5/clk-2 acts in a pathway that partially overlaps with the conserved C. elegans mrt-2/S. cerevisiae RAD17/S. pombe rad1(+) checkpoint pathway. In addition, rad-5/clk-2 also regulates the S phase replication checkpoint in C. elegans. Positional cloning reveals that the RAD-5/CLK-2 DNA damage checkpoint protein is homologous to S. cerevisiae Tel2p, an essential DNA binding protein that regulates telomere length in yeast. However, the partial loss-of-function C. elegans rad-5(mn159) and clk-2(qm37) checkpoint mutations have little effect on telomere length, and analysis of the partial loss-of-function of S. cerevisiae tel2-1 mutant failed to reveal typical DNA damage checkpoint defects.Conclusions: Using C. elegans genetics we define the novel DNA damage checkpoint protein RAD-5/CLK-2, which may play a role in oncogenesis. Given that Tel2p has been shown to bind to a variety of nucleic acid structures in vitro, we speculate that the RAD-5/CLK-2 checkpoint protein may act at sites of DNA damage, either as a sensor of DNA damage or to aid in the repair of damaged DNA.     

Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint

Following genotoxic insults, eukaryotic cells trigger a signal transduction cascade known as the DNA damage checkpoint response, which involves the loading onto DNA of an apical kinase and several downstream factors. Chromatin modifications play an important role in recruiting checkpoint proteins. In budding yeast, methylated H3-K79 is bound by the checkpoint factor Rad9. Loss of Dot1 prevents H3-K79 methylation, leading to a checkpoint defect in the G₁ phase of the cell cycle and to a reduction of checkpoint activation in mitosis, suggesting that another pathway contributes to Rad9 recruitment in M phase. We found that the replication factor Dpb11 is the keystone of this second pathway. dot1Δ dpb11-1 mutant cells are sensitive to UV or Zeocin treatment and cannot activate Rad53 if irradiated in M phase. Our data suggest that Dpb11 is held in proximity to damaged DNA through an interaction with the phosphorylated 9-1-1 complex, leading to Mec1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9. Dpb11 is also phosphorylated after DNA damage, and this modification is lost in a nonphosphorylatable ddc1-T602A mutant. Finally, we show that, in vivo, Dpb11 cooperates with Dot1 in promoting Rad9 phosphorylation but also contributes to the full activation of Mec1 kinase.     

Listeria monocytogenes induces host DNA damage and delays the host cell cycle to promote infection

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) is a human intracellular pathogen widely used to uncover the mechanisms evolved by pathogens to establish infection. However, its capacity to perturb the host cell cycle was never reported. We show that Lm infection affects the host cell cycle progression, increasing its overall duration but allowing consecutive rounds of division. A complete Lm infectious cycle induces a S-phase delay accompanied by a slower rate of DNA synthesis and increased levels of host DNA strand breaks. Additionally, DNA damage/replication checkpoint responses are triggered in an Lm dose-dependent manner through the phosphorylation of DNA-PK, H2A.X, and CDC25A and independently from ATM/ATR. While host DNA damage induced exogenously favors Lm dissemination, the override of checkpoint pathways limits infection. We propose that host DNA replication disturbed by Lm infection culminates in DNA strand breaks, triggering DNA damage/replication responses, and ensuring a cell cycle delay that favors Lm propagation.     

Initiation of DNA damage responses through XPG‐related nucleases

Lesion‐specific enzymes repair different forms of DNA damage, yet all lesions elicit the same checkpoint response. The common intermediate required to mount a checkpoint response is thought to be single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), coated by replication protein A (RPA) and containing a primer‐template junction. To identify factors important for initiating the checkpoint response, we screened for genes that, when overexpressed, could amplify a checkpoint signal to a weak allele of chk1 in fission yeast. We identified Ast1, a novel member of the XPG‐related family of endo/exonucleases. Ast1 promotes checkpoint activation caused by the absence of the other XPG‐related nucleases, Exo1 and Rad2, the homologue of Fen1. Each nuclease is recruited to DSBs, and promotes the formation of ssDNA for checkpoint activation and recombinational repair. For Rad2 and Exo1, this is independent of their S‐phase role in Okazaki fragment processing. This XPG‐related pathway is distinct from MRN‐dependent responses, and each enzyme is critical for damage resistance in MRN mutants. Thus, multiple nucleases collaborate to initiate DNA damage responses, highlighting the importance of these responses to cellular fitness.     

A novel yeast mutant that is defective in regulation of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex by the spindle damage checkpoint

The accurate segregation of sister chromatids at the metaphase to anaphase transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C). In the event of spindle damage or monopolar spindle attachment, the spindle checkpoint is activated and inhibits APC/C activity towards the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p, resulting in a cell cycle arrest at metaphase. We have identified a novel allele of a gene for an APC/C subunit, cdc16-183 , in S. cerevisiae. cdc16-183 mutants arrest at metaphase at 37°C, and are supersensitive to the spindle-damaging agent nocodazole, which activates the spindle checkpoint, at lower temperatures. This supersensitivity to nocodazole cannot be explained by impairment of the spindle checkpoint pathway, as cells respond normally to spindle damage with a stable metaphase arrest and high levels of Pds1p. Despite showing metaphase arrest at G2/M at 37°C, cdc16-183 mutants are able to perform tested G1 functions normally at this temperature. This is the first demonstration that a mutation in a core APC/C subunit can result in a MAD2-dependent arrest at the restrictive temperature. Our results suggest that the cdc16-183 mutant may have a novel APC/C defect(s) that mimics or activates the spindle checkpoint pathway.Communicated by C. P. Hollenberg     

Genetic analysis of CHK1 and CHK2 homologues revealed a unique cross talk between ATM and ATR pathways in Neurospora crassa

DNA damage checkpoint is an important mechanism for organisms to maintain genome integrity. In Neurospora crassa, mus-9 and mus-21 are homologues of ATR and ATM, respectively, which are pivotal factors of DNA damage checkpoint in mammals. A N. crassa clock gene prd-4 has been identified as a CHK2 homologue, but its role in DNA damage response had not been elucidated. In this study, we identified another CHK2 homologue and one CHK1 homologue from the N. crassa genome database. As disruption of these genes affected mutagen tolerance, we named them mus-59 and mus-58, respectively. The mus-58 mutant was sensitive to hydroxyurea (HU), but the mus-59 and prd-4 mutants showed the same HU sensitivity as that of the wild-type strain. This indicates the possibility that MUS-58 is involved in replication checkpoint and stabilization of stalled forks like mammalian CHK1. Phosphorylation of MUS-58 and MUS-59 was observed in the wild-type strain in response to mutagen treatments. Genetic relationships between those three genes and mus-9 or mus-21 indicated that the mus-9 mutation was epistatic to mus-58, and mus-21 was epistatic to prd-4. These relationships correspond to two signal pathways, ATR-CHK1 and ATM-CHK2 that have been established in mammalian cells. However, both the mus-9 mus-59 and mus-21 mus-58 double mutants showed an intermediate level between the two parental strains for CPT sensitivity. Furthermore, these double mutants showed severe growth defects. Our findings suggest that the DNA damage checkpoint of N. crassa is controlled by unique mechanisms.     

Infection with genotoxin‐producing Salmonella enterica synergises with loss of the tumour suppressor APC in promoting genomic instability via the PI3K pathway in colonic epithelial cells

Several commensal and pathogenic Gram‐negative bacteria produce DNA‐damaging toxins that are considered bona fide carcinogenic agents. The microbiota of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is enriched in genotoxin‐producing bacteria, but their role in the pathogenesis of CRC is poorly understood. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is mutated in familial adenomatous polyposis and in the majority of sporadic CRCs. We investigated whether the loss of APC alters the response of colonic epithelial cells to infection by Salmonella enterica, the only genotoxin‐producing bacterium associated with cancer in humans. Using 2D and organotypic 3D cultures, we found that APC deficiency was associated with sustained activation of the DNA damage response, reduced capacity to repair different types of damage, including DNA breaks and oxidative damage, and failure to induce cell cycle arrest. The reduced DNA repair capacity and inability to activate adequate checkpoint responses was associated with increased genomic instability in APC‐deficient cells exposed to the genotoxic bacterium. Inhibition of the checkpoint response was dependent on activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase pathway. These findings highlight the synergistic effect of the loss of APC and infection with genotoxin‐producing bacteria in promoting a microenvironment conducive to malignant transformation.     

Drosophila melanogaster: a model for the study of DNA damage checkpoint response

The cells of metazoans respond to DNA damage by either arresting their cell cycle in order to repair the DNA, or by undergoing apoptosis. This response is highly conserved across species, and many of the genes involved in this DNA damage response have been shown to be inactivated in human cancers. This suggests the importance of DNA damage response with regard to the prevention of cancer. The DNA damage checkpoint responses vary greatly depending on the developmental context, cell type, gene expression profile, and the degree and nature of the DNA lesions. More valuable information can be obtained from studies utilizing whole organisms in which the molecular basis of development has been well established, such as Drosophila. Since the discovery of the Drosophila p53 orthologue, various aspects of DNA damage responses have been studied in Drosophila. In this review, I will summarize the current knowledge on the DNA damage checkpoint response in Drosophila. With the ease of genetic, cellular, and cytological approaches, Drosophila will become an increasingly valuable model organism for the study of mechanisms inherent to cancer formation associated with defects in the DNA damage pathway.     

Deacetylase Rpd3 Facilitates Checkpoint Adaptation by Preventing Rad53 Overactivation

The DNA damage checkpoint is tightly controlled. After its activation, the checkpoint machinery is inactivated once lesions are repaired or undergoes adaptation if the DNA damage is unable to be repaired. Protein acetylation has been shown to play an important role in DNA damage checkpoint activation. However, the role of acetylation in checkpoint inactivation is unclear. Here we show that histone deacetylase Rpd3-mediated deacetylation of Rad53 plays an important role in checkpoint adaptation. Deletion of Rpd3 or inhibition of its activity impairs adaptation. RPD3 deletion also leads to a higher acetylation level and enhanced kinase activity of Rad53. Replacement of two major acetylation sites of Rad53 with arginine reduces its activity and further suppresses the adaptation defect of rpd3Δ cells, indicating that Rpd3 facilitates adaptation by preventing Rad53 overactivation. Similar to its role in adaptation, deletion of RPD3 or inhibition of its activity also suppressed checkpoint recovery. Altogether, our findings reveal an important role of Rpd3 in promoting checkpoint adaptation via deacetylation and inhibition of Rad53.     

A Rad53 Independent Function of Rad9 Becomes Crucial for Genome Maintenance in the Absence of the RecQ Helicase Sgs1

The conserved family of RecQ DNA helicases consists of caretaker tumour suppressors, that defend genome integrity by acting on several pathways of DNA repair that maintain genome stability. In budding yeast, Sgs1 is the sole RecQ helicase and it has been implicated in checkpoint responses, replisome stability and dissolution of double Holliday junctions during homologous recombination. In this study we investigate a possible genetic interaction between SGS1 and RAD9 in the cellular response to methyl methane sulphonate (MMS) induced damage and compare this with the genetic interaction between SGS1 and RAD24. The Rad9 protein, an adaptor for effector kinase activation, plays well-characterized roles in the DNA damage checkpoint response, whereas Rad24 is characterized as a sensor protein also in the DNA damage checkpoint response. Here we unveil novel insights into the cellular response to MMS-induced damage. Specifically, we show a strong synergistic functionality between SGS1 and RAD9 for recovery from MMS induced damage and for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements, which is not the case for SGS1 and RAD24. Intriguingly, it is a Rad53 independent function of Rad9, which becomes crucial for genome maintenance in the absence of Sgs1. Despite this, our dissection of the MMS checkpoint response reveals parallel, but unequal pathways for Rad53 activation and highlights significant differences between MMS- and hydroxyurea (HU)-induced checkpoint responses with relation to the requirement of the Sgs1 interacting partner Topoisomerase III (Top3). Thus, whereas earlier studies have documented a Top3-independent role of Sgs1 for an HU-induced checkpoint response, we show here that upon MMS treatment, Sgs1 and Top3 together define a minor but parallel pathway to that of Rad9.     

Deregulated Ras signaling compromises DNA damage checkpoint recovery in S. cerevisiae

The DNA damage checkpoint maintains genome stability by arresting the cell cycle and promoting DNA repair under genotoxic stress. Cells must downregulate the checkpoint signaling pathways in order to resume cell division after completing DNA repair. While the mechanisms of checkpoint activation have been well-characterized, the process of checkpoint recovery, and the signals regulating it, has only recently been investigated. We have identified a new role for the Ras signaling pathway as a regulator of DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Here we report that in budding yeast, deletion of the IRA1 and IRA2 genes encoding negative regulators of Ras prevents cellular recovery from a DNA damage induced arrest. the checkpoint kinase Rad53 is dephosphorylated in an IRA-deficient strain, indicating that recovery failure is not caused by constitutive checkpoint pathway activation. the ira1Δ ira2Δ recovery defect requires the checkpoint kinase Chk1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) catalytic subunit Tpk2. Furthermore, PKA phosphorylation sites on the anaphase promoting complex specificity factor Cdc20 are required for the recovery defect, indicating a link between the recovery defect and PKA regulation of mitosis. This work identifies a new signaling pathway that can regulate DNA damage checkpoint recovery and implicates the Ras signaling pathway as an important regulator of mitotic events.Key words: DNA damage checkpoint, Ras signaling, budding yeast, cAMP-dependent protein kinase, anaphase promoting complex, neurofibromatosis type 1     

DNA damage signaling triggers the cytoplasm-to-vacuole pathway of autophagy to regulate cell cycle progression

Budding yeast cells suffering a single unrepaired DNA double-strand break (DSB) trigger the ATR (Mec1)-dependent DNA damage checkpoint and arrest prior to anaphase for 12–15 h, following which they adapt and resume cell division. When the DNA lesion can be repaired, the checkpoint is extinguished and cells “recover” and resume mitosis. In this autophagic punctum, we report that hyperactivation of autophagy—specifically via the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway—prevents both adaptation to, and recovery from, DNA damage, resulting in the permanent arrest of cells in G₂/M. We show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae deleted for genes encoding the Golgi-associated retrograde protein transport (GARP) complex are both adaptation- and recovery-defective. GARP mutants such as vps51Δ exhibit mislocalization of the key mitotic regulator, securin (Pds1), and its degradation by the vacuolar protease Prb1. In addition, separase (Esp1), is excluded from the nucleus, accounting for pre-anaphase arrest. Pds1 is degraded via the Cvt pathway. Many of the same defects seen by deleting GARP genes can be mimicked by hyperactivation of the Cvt pathway by overexpressing an unphosphorylatable form of ATG13 or by adding the TORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. These results suggest that nuclear events such as DNA damage can have profound effects on cytoplasmic processes and further expand the burgeoning connections between DNA damage and autophagy.     

Safeguarding genetic information in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

Eukaryotic cells employ a plethora of conserved proteins and mechanisms to ensure genome integrity. In metazoa, these mechanisms must operate in the context of organism development. This mini-review highlights two emerging features of DNA damage responses in Drosophila: a crosstalk between DNA damage responses and components of the spindle assembly checkpoint, and increasing evidence for the effect of DNA damage on the developmental program at multiple points during the Drosophila life cycle.     

Studying the DNA damage response using in vitro model systems

Exogenous and endogenous insults continuously damage DNA. DNA damage must be detected in order to prevent loss of vital genetic information. Cells respond to DNA damage by activating checkpoint pathways that delay the progression through the cell cycle, promote DNA repair or induce cell death. A regulatory network of proteins has been identified that participate in DNA damage checkpoint pathways. Central to this network are ATM, ATR and the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex. Detailed biochemical analysis of ATM, ATR and the MRN dependent DNA damage responses has taken advantage of several in vitro model systems to understand the detailed mechanisms underlying their function. Here we describe some recent findings obtained analysing these pathways using in vitro model systems. In particular we focus on the studies performed in the Xenopus laevis egg cell free extract, which recapitulates the DNA damage response in the context of the cell cycle.     

Differential effects of caffeine on DNA damage and replication cell cycle checkpoints in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Caffeine potentiates the lethal effects of ultraviolet and ionising radiation on wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells. In previous studies this was attributed to the inhibition by caffeine of a novel DNA repair pathway in S. pombe that was absent in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies with radiation-sensitive S. pombe mutants suggested that this caffeine-sensitive pathway could repair ultraviolet radiation damage in the absence of nucleotide excision repair. The alternative pathway was thought to be recombinational and to operate in the G₂ phase of the cell cycle. However, in this study we show that cells held in G₁ of the cell cycle can remove ultraviolet-induced lesions in the absence of nucleotide excision repair. We also show that recombination-defective mutants, and those now known to define the alternative repair pathway, still exhibit the caffeine effect. Our observations suggest that the basis of the caffeine effect is not due to direct inhibition of recombinational repair. The mutants originally thought to be involved in a caffeine-sensitive recombinational repair process are now known to be defective in arresting the cell cycle in S and/or G₂ following DNA damage or incomplete replication. The gene products may also have an additional role in a DNA repair or damage tolerance pathway. The effect of caffeine could, therefore, be due to interference with DNA damage checkpoints, or inhibition of the DNA damage repair/tolerance pathway. Using a combination of flow cytometric analysis, mitotic index analysis and fluorescence microscopy we show that caffeine interferes with intra-S phase and G₂ DNA damage checkpoints, overcoming cell cycle delays associated with damaged DNA. In contrast, caffeine has no effect on the DNA replication S phase checkpoint in reponse to inhibition of DNA synthesis by hydroxyurea. Received: 16 June 1998 / Accepted: 13 July 1998     

DNA‐PK suppresses a p53‐independent apoptotic response to DNA damage

p53 is required for DNA damage‐induced apoptosis, which is central to its function as a tumour suppressor. Here, we show that the apoptotic defect of p53‐deficient cells is nearly completely rescued by inactivation of any of the three subunits of the DNA repair holoenzyme DNA‐dependent protein kinase (DNA‐PK). Intestinal crypt cells from p53 nullizygous mice were resistant to radiation‐induced apoptosis, whereas apoptosis in DNA‐PK_cs/p53, Ku80/p53 and Ku70/p53 double‐null mice was quantitatively equivalent to that seen in wild‐type mice. This p53‐independent apoptotic response was specific to the loss of DNA‐PK, as it was not seen in ligase IV (Lig4)/p53 or ataxia telangiectasia mutated (Atm)/p53 double‐null mice. Furthermore, it was associated with an increase in phospho‐checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2), and cleaved caspases 3 and 9, the latter indicating engagement of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. This shows that there are two separate, but equally effective, apoptotic responses to DNA damage: one is p53 dependent and the other, engaged in the absence of DNA‐PK, does not require p53.