Adaptive response and induced resistance

Cellular stress responses are upregulated following exposure to radiation and other DNA-damaging agents. Therefore radiation response can be dose dependent so that small acute exposures (and possibly exposures at very low dose rates?) are more lethal per unit dose than larger exposures above a threshold (typically 10-40 cGy) where induced radioprotection is triggered. We have termed these interlinked phenomena low-dose hypersensitivity (HRS) and induced radioresistance (IRR) as the dose increases. HRS/IRR has been recorded in cell-survival studies with yeast, bacteria, protozoa, algae, higher plant cells, insect cells, mammalian and human cells in vitro, and in studies on animal normal-tissue models in vivo. There is indirect evidence that cell survival-related HRS/IRR in response to single doses is a manifestation of the same underlying mechanism that determines the well-known adaptive response in the two-dose case and that it can be triggered by high- and low-LET radiations as well as a variety of other stress-inducing agents such as hydrogen peroxide and chemotherapeutic agents. Little is currently known about the precise nature of this underlying mechanism, but there is evidence that it operates by increasing the amount and rate of DNA repair, rather than by indirect mechanisms such as modulation of cell-cycle progression or apoptosis. Changed expression of some genes, only in response to low and not high doses, may occur within a few hours of irradiation and this would be rapid enough to explain the phenomenon of induced radioresistance although its specific molecular components have yet to be identified. Net cancer risk is a balance between cell transformation and cell kill. Our known low-dose cell-survival responses suggest that lethality may more than compensate for transformation at low radiation doses. However, adaptive reduction in sensitivity to radio-mutation has also been reported, which implies the existence also of enhanced mutation following very low single doses. So far this has not been confirmed, but provided the trigger dose for mutational protection was lower than the trigger dose for protection against cytotoxicity, cell killing would still dominate over at least the first 10 cGy of low-LET exposure. This would lead to a non-linear, threshold, dose-risk relationship and even provide some explanation for anecdotal reports of apparent 'health promoting' effects and lowered cancer risk from very low exposure to ionising radiation.     

A two-mutation model of radiation-induced acute myeloid leukemia using historical mouse data

From studies of the atomic bomb survivors, it is well known that ionizing radiation causes several forms of leukemia. However, since the specific mechanism behind this process remains largely unknown, it is difficult to extrapolate carcinogenic effects at acute high-dose exposures to risk estimates for the chronic low-dose exposures that are important for radiation protection purposes. Recently, it has become clear that the induction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in CBA/H mice takes place through two key steps, both involving the Sfpi1 gene. A similar mechanism may play a role in human radiation-induced AML. In the present paper, a two-mutation carcinogenesis model is applied to model AML in several data sets of X-ray- and neutron-exposed CBA/H mice. The models obtained provide good fits to the data. A comparison between the predictions for neutron-induced and X-ray-induced AML yields an RBE for neutrons of approximately 3. The model used is considered to be a first step toward a model for human radiation-induced AML, which could be used to estimate risks of exposure to low doses.     

Accumulation, activation and interindividual variation of the epidermal TP53 protein in response to ionizing radiation in organ cultured human skin

In this study, we examined effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on organ cultured human foreskin and, in particular, on the epidermis. Diagnostic, therapeutic, natural environmental and incidental exposures to moderate to low doses of radiation are inevitable and, although information on cultured cells continues to accumulate, little is known about the effects of low-dose radiation on human tissues. Our hypothesis is that ex vivo organ cultured foreskin is a simple and reliable model to study the biochemical effects of low-dose radiation exposure on skin. A model such as this will aid in the identification and quantification of low-dose radiation-induced changes in proteins in human skin and may be useful in the development of a precise, non-invasive, and reliable assay of exposure. In this work, several aspects of skin responses to culture conditions and radiation were examined. The responses of epidermal TP53 from organ cultured skin irradiated in medium with and without serum were found to be similar. TP53 levels in organ cultured neonatal foreskin epidermis were then examined for baseline TP53 expression. After an initial increase at 4 h, the TP53 D01 signal returned to low steady-state levels for at least 72 h. Irradiated skin samples from different individuals revealed variations in the TP53 D01 signal. The dose and temporal response of dermis and epidermis to radiation were examined by Western blotting from 0 to 24 h after exposure. After irradiation and incubation, the epidermis was removed and assayed by Western blotting and was found to have increases in the TP53 D01 epitope and the TP53 phosphoserine 15 (TP53-S15p) epitope that reached a maximum at about 3 h. In the epidermis, doses of 1-5 cGy of radiation were detectable with the TP53 D01, and CDKN1A antibodies and doses greater than 10 cGy were detectable with the TP53-S15p antibody. When the dermis was compared to epidermis, it was found that dermis had a smaller response to radiation and more phosphorylated TP53.     

Justification and optimization of radiation exposures: a new framework to aggregate arbitrary detriments and benefits

Myriad radiation effects, including benefits and detriments, complicate justifying and optimizing radiation exposures. The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework and corresponding quantitative methods to aggregate the detriments and benefits of radiation exposures to individuals, groups, and populations. In this study, concepts from the ICRP for low dose were integrated with clinical techniques focused on high dose to develop a comprehensive figure of merit (FOM) that takes into account arbitrary host- and exposure-related factors, endpoints, and time points. The study built on existing methods with three new capabilities: application to individuals, groups, and populations; extension to arbitrary numbers and types of endpoints; and inclusion of limitation, where relevant. The FOM was applied to three illustrative exposure situations: emergency response, diagnostic imaging, and cancer radiotherapy, to evaluate its utility in diverse settings. The example application to radiation protection revealed the FOM’s utility in optimizing the benefits and risks to a population while keeping individual exposures below applicable regulatory limits. Examples in diagnostic imaging and cancer radiotherapy demonstrated the FOM’s utility for guiding population- and patient-specific decisions in medical applications. The major finding of this work is that it is possible to quantitatively combine the benefits and detriments of any radiation exposure situation involving an individual or population to perform cost-effectiveness analyses using the ICRP key principles of radiation protection. This FOM fills a chronic gap in the application of radiation-protection theory, i.e., limitations of generalized frameworks to algorithmically justify and optimize radiation exposures. This new framework potentially enhances objective optimization and justification, especially in complex exposure situations.

     

Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis

The prime concern of radiation protection policy since 1959 has been protecting DNA from damage. The 1995 NCRP Report 121 on collective dose states that since no human data provides direct support for the linear no threshold hypothesis (LNT), and some studies provide quantitative data that, with statistical significance, contradict LNT, ultimately, confidence in LNT is based on the biophysical concept that the passage of a single charged particle could cause damage to DNA that would result in cancer. Current understanding of the basic molecular biologic mechanisms involved and recent data are examined before presenting several statistically significant epidemiologic studies that contradict the LNT hypothesis. Over eons of time a complex biosystem evolved to control the DNA alterations (oxidative adducts) produced by about 10(10) free radicals/cell/d derived from 2-3% of all metabolized oxygen. Antioxidant prevention, enzymatic repair of DNA damage, and removal of persistent DNA alterations by apoptosis, differentiation, necrosis, and the immune system, sequentially reduce DNA damage from about 10(6) DNA alterations/cell/d to about 1 mutation/cell/d. These mutations accumulate in stem cells during a lifetime with progressive DNA damage-control impairment associated with aging and malignant growth. A comparatively negligible number of mutations, an average of about 10(-7) mutations/cell/d, is produced by low LET radiation background of 0.1 cGy/y. The remarkable efficiency of this biosystem is increased by the adaptive responses to low-dose ionizing radiation. Each of the sequential functions that prevent, repair, and remove DNA damage are adaptively stimulated by low-dose ionizing radiation in contrast to their impairment by high-dose radiation. The biologic effect of radiation is not determined by the number of mutations it creates, but by its effect on the biosystem that controls the relentless enormous burden of oxidative DNA damage. At low doses, radiation stimulates this biosystem with consequent significant decrease of metabolic mutations. Low-dose stimulation of the immune system may not only prevent cancer by increasing removal of premalignant or malignant cells with persistent DNA damage, but used in human radioimmunotherapy may also completely remove malignant tumors with metastases. The reduction of gene mutations in response to low-dose radiation provides a biological explanation of the statistically significant observations of mortality and cancer mortality risk decrements, and contradicts the biophysical concept of the basic mechanisms upon which, ultimately, the NCRPs confidence in the LNT hypothesis is based.     

Evaluation of genetic radiation hazards in man: History,present status and perspectives

The evaluation of genetic radiation hazards in man is an ongoing scientific enterprise from about the mid-1950s. Since estimates of genetic risks are essential for providing a basis for protecting our genetical endowment and since strictly relevant human data are limited, there is no alternative at present but to use the data from mouse and certain non-human primates. This paper reviews the general principles and methods that have thus far been used, appraises the evolution of the conceptual framework, the data base and the assumptions involved, presents current estimates of genetic risks and provides some perspective of the advances that are likely to be made in the near future. Currently, risk estimates are made using the so-called “direct method” and the “doubling dose method”. Both these methods involve a number of assumptions and consequent uncertainties. With the direct method, it is now estimated that following low LET, low dose-rate or low-dose irradiation of males, there will be (i) about 10–20 cases of affected children per million births per rad of exposure, who will suffer from the effects of induced mutations having dominant effects and (ii) about 1 to 10 cases of congenitally malformed children (again per million births per rad), a consequence of the induction of reciprocal translocations. For irradiation of females under similar conditions, the estimated risks are 0–9 and 0–3 affected children per million births per rad, these being the consequence of induction of dominant mutations and of reciprocal translocations, respectively. The doubling dose method is used to estimate risks to a population under continuous irradiation. If the population is exposed to low LET irradiation at a rate of 1 rad/generation (1 generation = 30 years), the expected total increments in the frequencies of genetic diseases are about 20 cases per million births in the first generation and about 150 cases per million births at equilibrium. These expected increments are very small fractions of the spontaneous prevalence of genetic and partially genetic disorders, currently estimated to be about 10.6 %.     

Nontargeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for low-dose exposures

The traditional thinking has been that the biological effects of ionizing radiation occur in irradiated cells as a consequence of the DNA damage they incur. This implies that: 1) biological effects occur only in irratiated cells, 2) radiation traversal through the nucleus of the cell is a prerequisite to produce a biological response, and 3) DNA is the target molecule in the cell. Evidence has been emerging, however, for non-DNA targeted effects of radiation; that is, effects including mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and changes in gene expression which occur in cells that in themselves receive no radiation exposure. Two of these phenomena will be described in this paper. The first is radiation-induced genomic instability whereby biological effects, including elevated frequencies of mutations and chromosomal aberrations, arise in the distant descendants of irradiated cells. The second phenomenon has been termed the "bystander effect", whereby in a mixed population of irradiated and nonirradiated cells, biological effects arise in those cells that receive no radiation exposure. The damage signals are transmitted from cell to cell through gap junction channels, and the genetic effects observed in bystander cells appear to result from an upregulation of oxidative stress. The possible influence of these non-targeted effects of radiation of the respounse to low-dose exposures is discussed.     

Effects of acute low doses of Gamma-radiation on erythrocytes membrane

It is believed that any dose of ionizing radiation may damage cells and that the mutated cells could develop into cancer cells. Additionally, results of research performed over the past century on the effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on biological organisms show beneficial health effects, called hormesis. Much less is known about the cellular response to low doses of ionizing radiation, such as those typical for medical diagnostic procedures, normal occupational exposures or cosmic-ray exposures at flight altitudes. Extrapolating from the effects observed at higher doses to predict changes in cells after low-dose exposure is problematic. We examined the biological effects of low doses (0.01–0.3 Gy) of γ-radiation on the membrane characteristics of erythrocytes of albino rats and carried out osmotic fragility tests and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Our results indicate that the lowest three doses in the investigated radiation range, i.e., 0.01, 0.025 and 0.05 Gy, resulted in positive effects on the erythrocyte membranes, while a dose of 0.1 Gy appeared to represent the limiting threshold dose of those positive effects. Doses higher than 0.1 Gy were associated with the denaturation of erythrocyte proteins.     

Bisphenol A: a scientific evaluation

Bisphenol A (BPA) is used in the production of high-volume polycarbonate and epoxy resin compounds found in a number of consumer products, including plastic bottles and the linings of canned goods. As a result of such applications, very small amounts of BPA can migrate into food and drink. In light of reports suggesting that low doses of BPA cause estrogenic effects in laboratory animals, concerns were raised about the safety of these consumer products, particularly plastic bottles used for feeding milk to babies. To evaluate the risk, if any, from BPA, investigations were undertaken to more precisely determine human exposure levels and more carefully study the validity of the low-dose effects reported. On the basis of the most realistic studies of BPA levels in food and drink, as well as in human urine, it has been estimated that human exposures, including those of children, are very low and range from about .001 to .1 mcg/kg body weight (bw)/day. The results of the additional toxicology studies indicated that the low-dose effects could not be consistently replicated. In light of this, a number of governments and agencies brought together independent expert panels to carefully evaluate the toxicologic studies and provide regulatory guidance. These panels came to a similar conclusion, namely, that low-dose effects have not been demonstrated. They also supported the acceptable daily intake levels previously calculated on the basis of high-dose effects shown in laboratory animals. Comparing these acceptable intakes with the best exposure estimates reveals that human doses of BPA from migration of the compound into food and drink are orders of magnitude lower than acceptable daily intakes. Thus, it is very unlikely that humans, including infants and young children, are at risk from the presence of BPA in consumer products.     

Low-dose ionizing radiation: induction of differential intracellular signalling possibly affecting intercellular communication

Given the complexity of the carcinogenic process and the lack of any mechanistic understanding of how ionizing radiation at low-level exposures affects the multistage, multimechanism processes of carcinogenesis, it is imperative that concepts and paradigms be reexamined when extrapolating from high dose to low dose. Any health effect directly linked to low-dose radiation exposure must have molecular/biochemical and biological bases. On the other hand, demonstrating some molecular/biochemical or cellular effect, using surrogate systems for the human being, does not necessarily imply a corresponding health effect. Given the general acceptance of an extrapolated LNT model, our current understanding of carcinogenesis cries out for a resolution of a real problem. How can a low-level acute, or even a chronic, exposure of ionizing radiation bring about all the different mechanisms (mutagenic, cytotoxic, and epigenetic) and genotypic/phenotypic changes needed to convert normal cells to an invasive, malignant cell, given all the protective, repair, and suppressive systems known to exist in the human body? Until recently, the prevailing paradigm that ionizing radiation brings about cancer primarily by DNA damage and its conversion to gene and chromosomal mutations, drove our interpretation of radiation carcinogenesis. Today, our knowledge includes the facts both that epigenetic events play a major role in carcinogenesis and that low-dose radiation can also induce epigenetic events in and between cells in tissues. This challenges any simple extrapolation of the LNT model. Although a recent delineation of “hallmarks” of the cancer process has helped to focus on how ionizing radiation might contribute to the induction of cancers, several other hallmarks, previously ignored—namely, the stem cells in tissues as targets for carcinogenesis and the role of cell–cell communication processes in modulating the radiation effects on the target cell—must be considered, particularly for the adaptive response, bystander effects, and genomic instability phenomena.     

Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI): strategic research agenda for low dose radiation risk research

MELODI (Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative) is a European radiation protection research platform with focus on research on health risks after exposure to low-dose ionising radiation. It was founded in 2010 and currently includes 44 members from 18 countries. A major activity of MELODI is the continuous development of a long-term European Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) on low-dose risk for radiation protection. The SRA is intended to identify priorities for national and European radiation protection research programs as a basis for the preparation of competitive calls at the European level. Among those key priorities is the improvement of health risk estimates for exposures close to the dose limits for workers and to reference levels for the population in emergency situations. Another activity of MELODI is to ensure the availability of European key infrastructures for research activities, and the long-term maintenance of competences in radiation research via an integrated European approach for training and education. The MELODI SRA identifies three key research topics in low dose or low dose-rate radiation risk research: (1) dose and dose rate dependence of cancer risk, (2) radiation-induced non-cancer effects and (3) individual radiation sensitivity. The research required to improve the evidence base for each of the three key topics relates to three research lines: (1) research to improve understanding of the mechanisms contributing to radiogenic diseases, (2) epidemiological research to improve health risk evaluation of radiation exposure and (3) research to address the effects and risks associated with internal exposures, differing radiation qualities and inhomogeneous exposures. The full SRA and associated documents can be downloaded from the MELODI website (http://www.melodi-online.eu/sra.html).     

Radiobiology and radiation hygiene

From the analysis of clinical, epidemiological and radiobiological data the radiation effect levels have been determined at which nonstochastic and stochastic effects are or are not displayed during the average life of a human being. The most "noneffective" radiation does have been used in calculating the major dose thresholds of "non-harmful" exposures.     

Selective brain responses to acute and chronic low-dose X-ray irradiation in males and females

Radiation exposure is known to have profound effects on the brain, leading to precursor cell dysfunction and debilitating cognitive declines [Nat. Med. 8 (2002) 955]. Although a plethora of data exist on the effects of high radiation doses, the effects of low-dose irradiation, such as ones received during repetitive diagnostic and therapeutic exposures, are still under-investigated [Am. J. Otolaryngol. 23 (2002) 215; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 889; Curr. Opin. Neurol. 16 (2003) 129]. Furthermore, most studies of the biological effects of ionizing radiation have been performed using a single acute dose, while clinically and environmentally relevant exposures occur predominantly under chronic/repetitive conditions. Here, we have used a mouse model to compare the effects of chronic/repetitive and acute low-dose radiation (LDR) exposure (0.5Gy) to ionizing radiation on the brain in vivo. We examined the LDR effects on p42/44 MAPK (ERK1/ERK2), CaMKII, and AKT signaling-the interconnected pathways that have been previously shown to be crucial for neuronal survival upon irradiation. We report perturbations in ERK1/2, AKT, and CREB upon acute and chronic/repetitive low-dose exposure in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of mice. These studies were paralleled by the analysis of radiation effects on neurogenesis and cellular proliferation. Repetitive exposure had a much more pronounced effect on cellular signaling and neurogenesis than acute exposure. These results suggest that studies of single acute exposures might be limited in terms of their predictive value. We also present the first evidence of sex differences in radiation-induced signaling in the hippocampus and frontal cortex. We show the role of estrogens in brain radiation responses and discuss the implications of the observed changes.     

Phenomena leading to cell survival values which deviate from linear-quadratic models

For several decades, the prevailing paradigm for modeling the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on living systems was the target model with its inherent assumptions--that only those cells in the radiation path whose molecules sustained collisions with high energy particles and rays were damaged, that the damage was proportional to the energy absorbed by each cell and to the number of cells absorbing energy, and that all cells had identical sensitivities to radiation. However, evidence has accumulated that cells exhibit phenomena at low radiation exposures that appear to contradict at least one of these assumptions. Some of these phenomena currently under active study include low-dose hypersensitivity (HRS), increased radiation radioresistance (IRR), the adaptive response (AR), the bystander effect (BE), and death-inducing factor (DIE). These effects may interact to give rise to other phenomena such as hormesis, in which small amounts of otherwise toxic agent appear to be beneficial. Elucidating the cellular and molecular bases for these phenomena will lead to greater understanding of the relationships of these processes, including hormesis, to human health.     

Radiation-induced bystander effects: past history and future directions

There has been a recent upsurge of interest in the phenomenon now known as radiation-induced bystander effects. This is largely due to the increased awareness of the contribution of indirect and delayed effects, such as genomic instability, to cellular outcomes after low-dose exposures. It is also due to the availability of tools such as the microbeam and advanced cell culture systems and to the ability to study end points such as gene or protein expression at low doses which were previously difficult to study. This review looks at the history of bystander effects in the earlier literature, in which the clastogenic effect of plasma from irradiated patients was well known. The effect was known to persist for several years and to cause transgenerational effects, making it similar to what we now call genomic instability. The review then examines the current data and controversies which are now beginning to resolve the questions concerning the mechanisms underlying the induction and transmission of both bystander effects and genomic instability. Finally, the possible impact of data concerning radiation-induced bystander effects on radiotherapy and radiation protection is discussed.     

Mini-and microsatellite mutations in children from Chernobyl accident cleanup workers

Knowledge about possible genotoxic effects of low-dose radiation on the human germline is limited and relies primarily on extrapolations from high-dose exposures. To test whether ionizing radiation can cause paternal genetic mutations that are transmitted to offspring, we enrolled families of 88 Chernobyl cleanup workers exposed to ionizing radiation. We analyzed DNA isolated from lymphocytes for mutations via DNA blotting with the multi-locus minisatellite probes 33.6 and 33.15 and via PCR in a panel of six tetranucleotide repeats. Children conceived before and children conceived after their father's exposure showed no statistically significant differences in mutation frequencies. We saw an increase in germline microsatellite mutations after radiation exposure that was not statistically significant. We found no dependence of mutation rate on increasing exposure. A novel finding was that the tetranucleotide marker D7S1482 demonstrated germline hypermutability. In conclusion, our results do not support an increased level of germline minisatellite mutations but suggest a modest increase in germline mutations in tetranucleotide repeats. Small sample size, however, limited statistical power.     

Failla memorial lecture. Risk, research, and radiation protection

Radiation protection concerns the risk of stochastic late effects, especially cancer, and limits on radiation exposure both occupationally and for the public tend to be based on these risks. The risks are determined, mainly by expert committees, from the steadily growing information on exposed human populations, especially the survivors of the atomic bombs dropped in Japan in 1945. Risks of cancer estimated up to the early 1980s were in the range 1 to 5 X 10(-2)/Sv, but recent revisions in the dosimetry of the Japanese survivors and additional cycles of epidemiological information suggest values now probably at the high end of this range. These are likely to require an increase in the values used for radiation protection. A major problem with risk estimation is that data are available only for substantial doses and must be extrapolated down to the low-dose region of interest in radiation protection. Thus the shape of the dose-response curve is important, and here we must turn to laboratory research. Of importance are studies involving (1) dose rate, which affects the response to low-LET radiation and often to high-LET radiation as well; (2) radiation quality, since the shapes of the dose-response curves for high- and low-LET radiation differ and thus the RBE, the ratio between them, varies, reaching a maximum value RBEM at low doses; and (3) modifiers of the carcinogenic response, which either enhance or reduce the effect of a given dose. Radiation protection depends both on risk information, and especially also on comparisons with other occupational and public risks, and on research, not only for extrapolations of risk to low doses but also in areas where human information is lacking such as in the effects of radiation quality and in modifications of response.     

Role of apoptosis in low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity

Little is known about the mode of cell killing associated with low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, the radiation response that describes the enhanced sensitivity of cells to small doses of ionizing radiation. Using a technique that measures the activation of caspase 3, we have established a relationship between apoptosis detected 24 h after low-dose radiation exposure and low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in four mammalian cell lines (T98G, U373, MR4 and 3.7 cells) and two normal human lymphoblastoid cell lines. The existence of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in clonogenic survival experiments was found to be associated with an elevated level of apoptosis after low-dose exposures, corroborating earlier observations (Enns et al., Mol. Cancer Res. 2, 557-566, 2004). We also show that enriching populations of MR4 and V79 cells with G(1)-phase cells, to minimize the numbers of G(2)-phase cells, abolished the enhanced low-dose apoptosis. These cell-cycle enrichment experiments strengthen the reported association between low-dose hyper-sensitivity and the radioresponse of G(2)-phase cells. These data are consistent with our current hypothesis to explain low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, namely that the enhanced sensitivity of cells to low doses of ionizing radiation reflects the failure of ATM-dependent repair processes to fully arrest the progression of damaged G(2)-phase cells harboring unrepaired DNA breaks entering mitosis.