Estrogen-related receptors-stimulated monoamine oxidase B promoter activity is down-regulated by estrogen receptors

Although there are studies published about the neuroprotective effect of estrogen, little is known about the mechanisms and cellular targets of the hormone. Recent reports demonstrate that estrogen down-regulates the expression of monoamine oxidase A and B (MAO-A and MAO-B) in the hypothalamus of the Macaques monkey, both of which are key isoenzymes in the neurotransmitter degradation pathway. Additionally, estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) up-regulates MAO-B gene expression in breast cancer cells. ERRalpha recognizes a variety of estrogen response elements and shares many target genes and coactivators with estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha). In this study, we investigate the interplay of ERs and ERRs in the regulation of MAO-B promoter activity. We demonstrate that ERRalpha and ERRgamma up-regulate MAO-B gene activity, whereas ERalpha and ERbeta decrease stimulation in both a ligand-dependent and -independent manner. Ectopically expressed ERRalpha and ERRgamma stimulate the expression of MAO-B mRNA and protein as well as increase the MAO-B enzymatic activity in ER-negative HeLa cells. The ability of ERRs to stimulate MAO-B promoter activity was reduced in ER-positive MCF-7 and T47D cells. Several AGGTCA motifs of the MAO-B promoter are responsible for up-regulation by ERRs. Interestingly, ERalpha or ERbeta alone have no effect on MAO-B promoter activity but can down-regulate the activation function of ERRs, whereas glucocorticoid receptor does not. By using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrate that ERs compete with ERRs for binding to the MAO-B promoter at selective AGGTCA motifs, thereby changing the chromatin status and cofactor recruitment to a repressed state. These studies provide new insight into the relationship between ERalpha, ERbeta, ERRalpha, and ERRgamma in modulation of MAO-B gene activity.     

The role of tyrosine at the ligand-binding site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Identification of the critical residues in a receptor's ligand-binding site provides valuable structural information important for understanding the basis for ligand recognition. The design of specific ligands targeted for receptor action will depend to a great extent on detailed structural knowledge of this kind. Although the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is perhaps the best characterized of all receptors, the detailed configuration of the ligand-binding site remains unknown. Structural comparisons of nicotinic agonists and antagonists have long predicted a negative subsite on the receptor to interact with the positively charged alkyl-ammonium moiety common to nearly all nicotinic agents. We have used intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopic analyses together with binding studies of selectively modified peptide fragments of the nAChR to suggest that one or two invariant tyrosine residues at positions 190 and 198 on the alpha-subunit provide the critical negative subsite required for ligand binding. Tyrosines may similarly be part of the negative subsite of muscarinic receptors and other neurotransmitter receptors that bind cationic ligands.     

Structural basis for distinct ligand-binding and targeting properties of the receptors DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR

Both the dendritic cell receptor DC-SIGN and the closely related endothelial cell receptor DC-SIGNR bind human immunodeficiency virus and enhance infection. However, biochemical and structural comparison of these receptors now reveals that they have very different physiological functions. By screening an extensive glycan array, we demonstrated that DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR have distinct ligand-binding properties. Our structural and mutagenesis data explain how both receptors bind high-mannose oligosaccharides on enveloped viruses and why only DC-SIGN binds blood group antigens, including those present on microorganisms. DC-SIGN mediates endocytosis, trafficking as a recycling receptor and releasing ligand at endosomal pH, whereas DC-SIGNR does not release ligand at low pH or mediate endocytosis. Thus, whereas DC-SIGN has dual ligand-binding properties and functions both in adhesion and in endocytosis of pathogens, DC-SIGNR binds a restricted set of ligands and has only the properties of an adhesion receptor.