Dynamics of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Rates of turnover for the posttranslational acetylation of core histones were measured in logarithmically growing yeast cells by radioactive acetate labeling to near steady-state conditions. On average, acetylation half-lives were approximately 15 min for histone H4, 10 min for histone H3, 4 min for histone H2B, and 5 min for histone H2A. These rates were much faster than the several hours that have previously been reported for the rate of general histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. The current estimates are in line with changes in histone acetylation detected directly at specific chromatin locations and the speed of changes in gene expression that can be observed. These results emphasize that histone acetylation within chromatin is subject to constant flux. Detailed analysis revealed that the turnover rates for acetylation of histone H3 are the same from mono- through penta-acetylated forms. A large fraction of acetylated histone H3, including possibly all tetra- and penta-acetylated forms, appears subject to acetylation turnover. In contrast, the rate of acetylation turnover for mono- and di-acetylated forms of histones H4 and H2B, and the fraction subject to acetylation turnover, was lower than for multi-acetylated forms of these histones. This difference may reflect the difference in location of these histones within the nucleosome, a difference in the spectrum of histone-specific acetylating and deacetylating enzymes, and a difference in the role of acetylation in different histones.     

Regulation of histone acetylation during macronuclear differentiation in Tetrahymena: evidence for control at the level of acetylation and deacetylation

During the postzygotic period of the sexual cycle (conjugation) in the ciliated protozoan, Tetrahymena, daughter products from a single micronuclear mitotic division develop into new macronuclei (anlagen) or new micronuclei depending upon their cytoplasmic location. In this study we have monitored the status of histone acetylation in synchronous populations of developing nuclei isolated from conjugating cells. Particular attention has been paid to the level of histone acetylation in new macronuclei following their differentiation from micronuclei. Like micronuclei isolated from vegetative cells (Vavra et al., 1982), micronuclei from conjugating cells (5 hr, 10-12 hr, and 15-16 hr) contain little if any acetylated histone and incorporate little postsynthetic acetate under any of our experimental conditions. In contrast, young new macronuclei (4C, 10-12 hr) incorporate significant amounts of acetate in vitro and in vivo provided that sodium butyrate is included during the labeling period. These results suggest that 4C anlagen contain both active acetylase and deacetylase activities even though the actual steady state level of acetylation found in these nuclei is low, more like that of micronuclei. At later stages of macronuclear maturation (8C, 15-16 hr), inner histones are hyperacetylated in a manner similar to parental, fully differentiated macronuclei. Furthermore, 8C anlagen incorporate acetate well even in the absence of sodium butyrate. Taken together these results suggest that endogenous deacetylase enzymes become either down-regulated and/or the rate of histone acetylases increases markedly during macronuclear differentiation.     

Histone rearrangements accompany nuclear differentiation and dedifferentiation in Tetrahymena

Histone synthesis and deposition into specific classes of nuclei has been investigated in starved and conjugating Tetrahymena. During starvation and early stages of conjugation (between 0 and 5 hr after opposite mating types are mixed), micronuclei selectively lose preexisting micronuclear-specific histones α, β, γ, and H3^F. Of these histones, only α appears to accumulate in micronuclear chromatin through active synthesis and deposition during the mating process. Curiously, α is not observed (by stain or label) in young macronuclear anlagen (4C, 10 hr of conjugation). Thus, young macronuclear anlagen are missing all of the histones which are known to be specific to micronuclei of vegetative cells. By 14–16 hr of conjugation, we observe active synthesis and deposition of macronuclear-specific histones, hv1, hv2, and H1, into new macronuclear anlagen (8C). Thus macronuclear differentiation seems well underway by this time of conjugation. It is also in this time period (14–16 hr) that we first detect significant amounts of micronuclear-specific H1-like polypeptides β and γ in micronuclear extracts. These polypeptides do not seem to be synthesized during this period, which suggests that β and γ are derived from a precursor molecule(s). Since these micronuclear-specific histones do not appear in micronuclear chromatin until after other micronuclei have been selected to differentiate as macronuclei, we suspect that micronuclear differentiation is also an important process which occurs in 10–16 hr mating cells. Our results also suggest that proteolytic processing of micronuclear H3^S into H3^F (which occurs in a cell cycle dependent fashion during vegetative growth) is not operative during most if not all of conjugation. Thus micronuclei of mating cells contain only H3^S which also seems consistent with the fact that some micronuclei differentiate into new macronuclei (micronuclear H3^S is indistinguishable from macronuclear H3). Interestingly, the only H3 synthesized and deposited into the former macronucleus of mating cells is the relatively minor macronuclear-specific H3-like variant, hv2. These results demonstrate that significant histone rearrangements occur during conjugation in Tetrahymena in a manner consistent with the fact that during conjugation some micronuclei eventually differentiate into new macronuclei. Our results suggest that selective synthesis and deposition of specific histones (and histone variants) plays an important role in the nuclear differentiation process in Tetrahymena. The disappearance of specific histones also raises the possibility that developmentally regulated proteolytic processing of specific histones plays an important (and previously unsuspected) role in this system.     

Micronuclei and the cytoplasm of growing Tetrahymena contain a histone acetylase activity which is highly specific for free histone H4

Salt extracts prepared from purified micronuclei and the cytoplasm of growing Tetrahymena contain a histone acetylase (also referred to as histone acetyltransferase) activity which is highly specific for H4 when tested as a free histone. With both extracts, H4 is acetylated first at position 4 (monoacetylated) or positions 4 and 11 (diacetylated), sites diagnostic of deposition-related acetylation of newly synthesized H4 in vivo. As the concentration of cytosolic extract is decreased in the in vitro reactions, acetylation of H3 is also observed. Neither activity acetylates histone in a chromatin form. These activities are distinct from a macronuclear acetylase which acetylates H3 and H4 (macro- or micronuclear) equally well as free histones and which acetylates all four core histones when mononucleosomes are used as substrate. As well, the micronuclear and cytoplasmic activities give similar thermal-inactivation profiles which are different from that of the macronuclear activity. In situ enzyme assays demonstrate a macronuclear-specific activity which acetylates endogenous macronuclear chromatin and an independent micronuclear-cytosolic activity which is able to act upon exogenously added free H4. These results argue strongly that an identical acetylase is responsible for the micronuclear and cytoplasmic activity which is either modified or altogether distinct from that in macronuclei.     

Histone acetylation and the deoxyribonuclease I sensitivity of the Tetrahymena ribosomal gene

Under appropriate conditions, up to 8.5% of the total acetate can be removed from the histones of isolated Tetrahymena macronuclei by an endogenous histone deacetylase activity. After in vitro deacetylation, the ribosomal genes are still preferentially digested by DNase I. These observations suggested that either the majority of histone-bound acetate is unnecessary to maintain the DNase I sensitive state or ribosomal chromatin (rChromatin) histones remain acetylated under these conditions. The characteristics of histones acetylation were studied in Tetrahymena rChromatin, which can be isolated in a relatively pure form. Histones associated with the presumably active, DNase I sensitive ribosomal genes have a high steady-state level of histone acetylation which, surprisingly, is maintained by very low acetate turnover rates.     

Complete displacement of somatic histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin: a model experiment.

Displacement of histones from calf thymus chromatin has been studied in an attempt to postulate the mechanisms involved in the total removal of somatic-type histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin. When chromatin is saturated with protamine (protamine/DNA, 0.5), histone I becomes displaceable at 0.15-0.3 M NaCl, suggesting that direct replacement by highly basic sperm histone could be a mechanism for its removal. While histone I is the only histone which is extensively degraded upon incubation of chromatin and, therefore, proteolysis might provide an additional mechanism for the removal of this histone, acetylation of chromatin by acetic anhydride greatly increases suscpetibility of histones IIb1, IIb2, and III to the chromosomally associated protease. These histones are extensively degraded and displaced from the DNA upon incubation of the acetylated chromatin. Although histone IV is not appreciably degraded, the proteolytic removal of acetylated histone III from chromatin weakens the interaction of acetylated histone IV to the DNA, and this histone becomes dissociable at 0.3 M NaCl. A comparison of the extent of chemical acetylation of individual histones observed in this investigation with that of enzymatic acetylation which can be achieved in vivo suggests that acetylation and proteolysis could be a mechanism for the removal of histone IIb2 and III. The displacement of histones IIb1 and IV could be explained on the basis of decreased binding to DNA as a result of their acetylation together with the proteolytic removal of their respective partner histones, IIb2 and III.     

Modification of histone binding in calf thymus chromatin and in the chromatin-protamine complex by acetic anhydride.

A relationship between side-chain modification of histones and their displaceability from DNA has been investigated using calf thymus chromatin which was chemically acetylated with acetic anhydride. When the chromatin is treated with increasingly higher concentrations of the reagent, histones become acetylated to an increasingly greater extent, attaining the modification at 23-24 sites for histone I, 5-6 for IIb1, 9-10 for IIb2, 5-6 for III and 3-4 for IV. As the chromatin becomes more acetylated, NaCl concentrations required for histone removal are lowered. Saturation binding of protamine does not bring about either an increase in the number of acetylation sites of histones in chromatin or a decrease of the NaCl requirement for dissociation of the acetylated chromatins. A comparison of the present results with the extents of histone acetylation known to occur enzymatically in vivo indicates that the complete removal of somatic histones during transformation of chromatin in spermiogenesis cannot be explained on the basis of decreased binding of the histone to DNA by acetylation or by a combination of acetylation and protamine binding, suggesting that the displacement process may require some additional processes.