Homology model of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor: sites critical for nonclassical cannabinoid agonist interaction

Association of cannabimimetic compounds such as cannabinoids, aminoalkylindoles (AAIs), and arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide) with the brain cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor activates G-proteins and relays signals to regulate neuronal functions. A CB(1) receptor homology model was constructed using the published x-ray crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., Science, 2000, Vol. 289, pp. 739-745) in the conformation most likely to represent the "high-affinity" state for agonist binding to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A molecular docking approach that combined Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations was used to identify the putative binding conformations of nonclassical cannabinoid agonists, including AC-bicyclic CP47497 and CP55940, and ACD-tricyclic CP55244. Placement of these ligands was based upon the assumption of a critical hydrogen bond between the A-ring OH and the side chain N of Lys192 in transmembrane helix 3. We evaluated two alternative binding conformations, C3-in and C3-out, denoting the directionality of the ligand C3 side chain within the receptor with respect to the inside or the outside of the cell. Assuming both the C3-in or C3-out conformation, the calculated ligand-receptor binding energy (DeltaE(bind)) was correlated with the experimentally observed binding affinity (K(i)) for a series of nonclassical cannabinoid agonists. The C3-in conformation was marginally better than the alternative C3-out conformation in predicting the rank order of the tested nonclassical cannabinoid analogs. Adopting the C3-in conformation due to the greater number of receptor interactions with known pharmacophoric elements of the ligand, key residues were identified comprising the presumed hydrophobic pocket that interacts with the C3 side chain of cannabinoid agonists. Key hydrogen bonds would form between both K3.28(192) and E(258) and the A-ring OH, and between Q(261) and the C-ring C-12 hydroxypropyl. In summary, the present study represents one of the first attempts to construct a homology model of the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor based upon the published bovine rhodopsin x-ray crystal structure and to elucidate the putative ligand binding site for nonclassical cannabinoid agonists. We postulated sites of the CB(1) receptor critical for the ligand interaction, including the hydrophobic pocket interacting with the key pharmacophoric moiety, the C3 side chain. More work is needed to delineate between two alternative (and possibly other) binding conformations of the nonclassical cannabinoid ligands within the CB(1) receptor. The present study provides a consistent framework for further investigation of the CB(1) receptor-ligand interaction and for the study of CB(1) receptor activation.     

Characterisation of the cannabinoid receptor system in synovial tissue and fluid in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

Cannabis-based medicines have a number of therapeutic indications, including anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. The endocannabinoid receptor system, including the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) and receptor 2 (CB₂) and the endocannabinoids, are implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that cannabis-based drugs have therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the key elements of the endocannabinoid signalling system, which produces immunosuppression and analgesia, are expressed in the synovia of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or RA.

Methods

Thirty-two OA and 13 RA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. Clinical staging was conducted from x-rays scored according to Kellgren-Lawrence and Larsen scales, and synovitis of synovial biopsies was graded. Endocannabinoid levels were quantified in synovial fluid by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The expression of CB₁ and CB₂ protein and RNA in synovial biopsies was investigated. Functional activity of these receptors was determined with mitogen-activated protein kinase assays. To assess the impact of OA and RA on this receptor system, levels of endocannabinoids in the synovial fluid of patients and non-inflamed healthy volunteers were compared. The activity of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the predominant catabolic endocannabinoid enzyme, was measured in synovium.

Results

CB₁ and CB₂ protein and RNA were present in the synovia of OA and RA patients. Cannabinoid receptor stimulation of fibroblast-like cells from OA and RA patients produced a time-dependent phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1 and ERK-2 which was significantly blocked by the CB₁ antagonist SR141716A. The endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) were identified in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients. However, neither AEA nor 2-AG was detected in synovial fluid from normal volunteers. FAAH was active in the synovia of OA and RA patients and was sensitive to inhibition by URB597 (3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate).

Conclusion

Our data predict that the cannabinoid receptor system present in the synovium may be an important therapeutic target for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with OA and RA.     

The effects of beta-arrestin1 deletion on acute cannabinoid activity,brain cannabinoid receptors and tolerance to cannabinoids in mice

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have indicated a role for beta-arrestin2 in the regulation of brain cannabinoid effects and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors, but whether beta-arrestin1 has a role has not been investigated. Objective: To determine the role of beta-arrestin1 in cannabinoid activity. Materials and methods: Beta-arrestin1 ?/? mice and their wild-type (+/+) counterparts were assayed for antinociceptive and temperature-decreasing effects of two ligands, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CP55940, after both single and repeated administration. In vitro assays examined the effects of deletion on CB₁ receptor density, agonist-binding and G-protein activation. Results: Deletion of beta-arrestin1 diminished the effects of CP55940 in both antinociception (latency to tail withdrawal) and temperature-depression assays in mice. However, deleting beta-arrestin1 had no effect on the actions of THC in either assay. Antagonist radioligand ([³H]SR141716A) saturation binding indicated no difference between beta-arrestin1 +/+ and ?/? mice in the density or affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain membranes. CP55940 agonist binding in brain membranes from beta-arrestin1 +/+ mice exhibited high- and intermediate-affinity sites, but beta-arrestin1 ?/? membranes exhibited an additional site with low affinity. CP55940 produced greater stimulation of [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to membranes from whole brain of beta-arrestin1 ?/? than +/+ mice. The rates of the development of tolerance to chronic THC or CP55940 administration did not appear to be affected by genotype. Discussion: Beta-arrestin1 appeared to mediate the actions of CP55940, but did not affect the activity of THC. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin1 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptor sensitivity in an agonist-selective manner, but may not be the primary mediator of tolerance to cannabinoid agonists.     

Increased expression of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in Achilles tendinosis

Background

The endogenous cannabinoid system is involved in the control of pain. However, little is known as to the integrity of the cannabinoid system in human pain syndromes. Here we investigate the expression of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) in human Achilles tendons from healthy volunteers and from patients with Achilles tendinosis.

Methodology

Cannabinoid CB₁ receptor immunoreactivity (CB₁IR) was evaluated in formalin-fixed biopsies from individuals suffering from painful Achilles tendinosis in comparison with healthy human Achilles tendons.

Principal Findings

CB₁IR was seen as a granular pattern in the tenocytes. CB₁IR was also observed in the blood vessel wall and in the perineurium of the nerve. Quantification of the immunoreactivity in tenocytes showed an increase of CB₁ receptor expression in tendinosis tissue compared to control tissue.

Conclusion

Expression of cannabinoid receptor 1 is increased in human Achilles tendinosis suggesting that the cannabinoid system may be dysregulated in this disorder.     

Synthesis and binding study of certain 6-arylalkanamides as molecular probes for cannabinoid receptor subtypes

Tetrahydrocannabinol and other mixed cannabinoid (CB) receptors CB₁/CB₂ receptor agonists are well established to elicit antinociceptive effects and psychomimetic actions, however, their potential for abuse have dampened enthusiasm for their therapeutic development. In an effort to refine a semi-rigid structural framework for CB₂ receptors binding, we designed novel compounds based on aromatic moiety and flexible linker with various amides mimicking the outlook of the endogenous anandamide which could provide as CB₂ receptor ligand. In this direction, we developed and synthesized new aryl or arylidene hexanoic acid amides and aryl alkanoic acid diamide carrying different head groups. These new compounds were tested for their affinities for human recombinant CB receptors CB₁ and CB₂ and fatty acid amide hydrolase. Although, the preliminary screening of these compounds demonstrated weak binding activity towards CB receptor subtypes at 10 µmole, yet this template still could serve up as probes for further optimization and development of affinity ligand for CB receptors.     

Modeling of ligand binding to G protein coupled receptors: cannabinoid CB1, CB2 and adrenergic β2AR

Cannabinoid and adrenergic receptors belong to the class A (similar to rhodopsin) G protein coupled receptors. Docking of agonists and antagonists to CB₁ and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors revealed the importance of a centrally located rotamer toggle switch and its possible participation in the mechanism of agonist/antagonist recognition. The switch is composed of two residues, F3.36 and W6.48, located on opposite transmembrane helices TM3 and TM6 in the central part of the membranous domain of cannabinoid receptors. The CB₁ and CB₂ receptor models were constructed based on the adenosine A_2A receptor template. The two best scored conformations of each receptor were used for the docking procedure. In all poses (ligand-receptor conformations) characterized by the lowest ligand-receptor intermolecular energy and free energy of binding the ligand type matched the state of the rotamer toggle switch: antagonists maintained an inactive state of the switch, whereas agonists changed it. In case of agonists of β₂AR, the (R,R) and (S,S) stereoisomers of fenoterol, the molecular dynamics simulations provided evidence of different binding modes while preserving the same average position of ligands in the binding site. The (S,S) isomer was much more labile in the binding site and only one stable hydrogen bond was created. Such dynamical binding modes may also be valid for ligands of cannabinoid receptors because of the hydrophobic nature of their ligand-receptor interactions. However, only very long molecular dynamics simulations could verify the validity of such binding modes and how they affect the process of activation.     

Tumour Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor expression are additive prognostic markers for prostate cancer

Background

In cultured prostate cancer cells, down-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in mediating the antiproliferative effect of the endogenous cannabinoid (CB) ligand anandamide. Using a well-characterised cohort of prostate cancer patients, we have previously reported that expression levels of phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR-IR) and CB₁ receptor (CB₁IR) in tumour tissue at diagnosis are markers of disease-specific survival, but it is not known whether the two markers interact in terms of their influence on disease severity at diagnosis and disease outcome.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Data from a cohort of 419 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at transurethral resection for voiding difficulties was used. Scores for both tumour CB₁IR and pEGFR-IR were available in the database. Of these, 235 had been followed by expectancy until the appearance of metastases. For patients scored for both parameters, Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses using optimal cut-off scores indicated that the two measures provided additional diagnostic information not only to each other, but to that provided by the tumour stage and the Gleason score. When the cases were divided into subgroups on the basis of these cut-off scores, the patients with both CB₁IR and pEGFR-IR scores above their cut-off had a poorer disease-specific survival and showed a more severe pathology at diagnosis than patients with high pEGFR-IR scores but with CB₁IR scores below the cut-off.

Conclusions/Significance

These data indicate that a high tumour CB₁ receptor expression at diagnosis augments the deleterious effects of a high pEGFR expression upon disease-specific survival.     

Identification and Quantification of a New Family of Peptide Endocannabinoids (Pepcans) Showing Negative Allosteric Modulation at CB1 Receptors

The α-hemoglobin-derived dodecapeptide RVD-hemopressin (RVDPVNFKLLSH) has been proposed to be an endogenous agonist for the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB₁). To study this peptide, we have raised mAbs against its C-terminal part. Using an immunoaffinity mass spectrometry approach, a whole family of N-terminally extended peptides in addition to RVD-Hpα were identified in rodent brain extracts and human and mouse plasma. We designated these peptides Pepcan-12 (RVDPVNFKLLSH) to Pepcan-23 (SALSDLHAHKLRVDPVNFKLLSH), referring to peptide length. The most abundant Pepcans found in the brain were tested for CB₁ receptor binding. In the classical radioligand displacement assay, Pepcan-12 was the most efficacious ligand but only partially displaced both [³H]CP55,940 and [³H]WIN55,212-2. The data were fitted with the allosteric ternary complex model, revealing a cooperativity factor value α < 1, thus indicating a negative allosteric modulation. Dissociation kinetic studies of [³H]CP55,940 in the absence and presence of Pepcan-12 confirmed these results by showing increased dissociation rate constants induced by Pepcan-12. A fluorescently labeled Pepcan-12 analog was synthesized to investigate the binding to CB₁ receptors. Competition binding studies revealed K_i values of several Pepcans in the nanomolar range. Accordingly, using competitive ELISA, we found low nanomolar concentrations of Pepcans in human plasma and ∼100 pmol/g in mouse brain. Surprisingly, Pepcan-12 exhibited potent negative allosteric modulation of the orthosteric agonist-induced cAMP accumulation, [³⁵S]GTPγS binding, and CB₁ receptor internalization. Pepcans are the first endogenous allosteric modulators identified for CB₁ receptors. Given their abundance in the brain, Pepcans could play an important physiological role in modulating endocannabinoid signaling.     

Synthesis and pharmacology of 1-methoxy analogs of CP-47,497

Three 1-methoxy analogs of CP-47,497 (7, 8, and 19) have been synthesized and their affinities for the cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors have been determined. Although these compounds exhibit selectivity for the CB₂ receptor none have significant affinity for either receptor. Modeling and receptor docking studies were carried out, which provide a rationalization for the weak affinities of these compounds for either receptor.     

Cannabinoid-based drugs targeting CB1 and TRPV1, the sympathetic nervous system,and arthritis

Chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is accompanied by activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which can support the immune system to perpetuate inflammation. Several animal models of arthritis already demonstrated a profound influence of adrenergic signaling on the course of RA. Peripheral norepinephrine release from sympathetic terminals is controlled by cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB₁), which is activated by two major endocannabinoids (ECs), arachidonylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonylglycerol. These ECs also modulate function of transient receptor potential channels (TRPs) located on sensory nerve fibers, which are abundant in arthritic synovial tissue. TRPs not only induce the sensation of pain but also support inflammation via secretion of pro-inflammatory neuropeptides. In addition, many cell types in synovial tissue express CB₁ and TRPs. In this review, we focus on CB₁ and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1)-mediated effects on RA since most anti-inflammatory mechanisms induced by cannabinoids are attributed to cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB₂) activation. We demonstrate how CB₁ agonism or antagonism can modulate arthritic disease. The concept of functional antagonism with continuous CB₁ activation is discussed. Since fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is a major EC-degrading enzyme, the therapeutic possibility of FAAH inhibition is studied. Finally, the therapeutic potential of ECs is examined since they interact with cannabinoid receptors and TRPs but do not produce central side effects.     

The evolution and comparative neurobiology of endocannabinoid signalling

CB₁- and CB₂-type cannabinoid receptors mediate effects of the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide in mammals. In canonical endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity, 2-AG is generated postsynaptically by diacylglycerol lipase alpha and acts via presynaptic CB₁-type cannabinoid receptors to inhibit neurotransmitter release. Electrophysiological studies on lampreys indicate that this retrograde signalling mechanism occurs throughout the vertebrates, whereas system-level studies point to conserved roles for endocannabinoid signalling in neural mechanisms of learning and control of locomotor activity and feeding. CB₁/CB₂-type receptors originated in a common ancestor of extant chordates, and in the sea squirt Ciona intestinalis a CB₁/CB₂-type receptor is targeted to axons, indicative of an ancient role for cannabinoid receptors as axonal regulators of neuronal signalling. Although CB₁/CB₂-type receptors are unique to chordates, enzymes involved in biosynthesis/inactivation of endocannabinoids occur throughout the animal kingdom. Accordingly, non-CB₁/CB₂-mediated mechanisms of endocannabinoid signalling have been postulated. For example, there is evidence that 2-AG mediates retrograde signalling at synapses in the nervous system of the leech Hirudo medicinalis by activating presynaptic transient receptor potential vanilloid-type ion channels. Thus, postsynaptic synthesis of 2-AG or anandamide may be a phylogenetically widespread phenomenon, and a variety of proteins may have evolved as presynaptic (or postsynaptic) receptors for endocannabinoids.     

Role of endocannabinoids and endovanilloids in Ca signalling

Endocannabinoids and endovanilloids are, by definition, endogenous agonists at cannabinoid CB₁ or CB₂ receptors and transient receptor potential vanilloid-type-1 (TRPV1) channels, respectively. Due to the several ways through which cannabinoid receptors influence cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations, and to the fact that TRPV1 activation leads to the gating of cations, including Ca²⁺, both endocannabinoids and endovanilloids, taken separately, can strongly influence Ca²⁺ signalling. Moreover, CB₁/CB₂ receptors and TRPV1 channels are often expressed in the same or neighbouring cells, and this can lead to cross-talk between the two receptor types, which is further enriched by the fact that some endocannabinoids, like anandamide and N-arachidonoyldopamine, also activate TRPV1 channels. Finally, both endocannabinoids and endovanilloids also interact with non-cannabinoid, non-TRPV1 receptors and channels, and, although the full physiological relevance of such interactions is yet to be established, the “promiscuity” of these lipophilic molecules can increase even further the potential ways through which they affect Ca²⁺ signalling. Here we discuss the effects of endocannabinoids and endovanilloids on cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations and their potential biological consequences.     

3-Carboxamido-5-aryl-isoxazoles as new CB2 agonists for the treatment of colitis

Recent investigations showed that anandamide, the main endogenous ligand of CB₁ and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors, possesses analgesic, antidepressant and anti-inflammatory effects. In the perspective to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), our approach was to develop new selective CB₂ receptor agonists without psychotropic side effects associated to CB₁ receptors. In this purpose, a new series of 3-carboxamido-5-aryl-isoxazoles, never described previously as CB₂ receptor agonists, was designed, synthesized and evaluated for their biological activity. The pharmacological results have identified great selective CB₂ agonists with in vivo anti-inflammatory activity in a DSS-induced acute colitis mouse model.     

Probable involvement of Ca2 +-activated Cl− channels (CaCCs) in the activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors

AimsRecently, we demonstrated that peripheral antinociception induced by δ opioid receptor is dependent of Ca^2 +-activated Cl^? channels (CaCCs). Because opioid and cannabinoid receptors share some common mechanisms of action, our objective was to identify a possible relationship between CaCCs and the endocannabinoid system.Main methodsTo induce hyperalgesia, rat paws were treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂, 2 μg). Nociceptive thresholds to pressure (grams) were measured using an algesimetric apparatus 3 h following injection. Probabilities were calculated using ANOVA/Bonferroni's test, and values that were less than 5% were considered to be statistically significant.Key findingsAdministration of the cannabinoid agonist CB₁ anandamide (12.5, 25 and 50 μg/paw) and the cannabinoid agonist CB₂ PEA (5, 10 and 20 μg/paw) decreased the PGE₂-induced hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner. The possibility of the higher doses of anandamide (50 μg) and PEA (20 μg) having a central or systemic effect was excluded because the administration of the drug into the contralateral paw did not elicit antinociception in the right paw. As expected, the antinociceptive effects induced by anandamide and PEA were blocked by the CB₁ and CB₂ receptor antagonists AM251 and AM630, respectively. The peripheral antinociception was induced by anandamide but not PEA and was dose-dependently inhibited by the CaCC blocker niflumic acid (8, 16 and 32 μg).SignificanceThese results provide the first evidence for the involvement of CaCCs in the peripheral antinociception induced by activation of the CB₁ cannabinoid receptor.     

Expression,surface immobilization,and characterization of functional recombinant cannabinoid receptor CB2

Human peripheral cannabinoid receptor CB₂, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) involved in regulation of immune response has become an important target for pharmaceutical drug development. Structural and functional studies on CB₂ may benefit from immobilization of the purified and functional receptor onto a suitable surface at a controlled density and, preferably in a uniform orientation. The goal of this project was to develop a generic strategy for preparation of functional recombinant CB₂ and immobilization at solid interfaces. Expression of CB₂ as a fusion with Rho-tag (peptide composed of the last nine amino acids of rhodopsin) in E. coli was evaluated in terms of protein levels, accessibility of the tag, and activity of the receptor. The structural integrity of CB₂ was tested by ligand binding to the receptor solubilized in detergent micelles, captured on tag-specific monoclonal 1D4 antibody-coated resin. Highly pure and functional CB₂ was obtained by sequential chromatography on a 1D4- and Ni-NTA-resin and its affinity to the 1D4 antibody characterized by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Either the purified receptor or fusion CB₂ from the crude cell extract was captured onto a 1D4-coated CM4 chip (Biacore) in a quantitative fashion at uniform orientation as demonstrated by the SPR signal. Furthermore, the accessibility of the extracellular surface of immobilized CB₂ and the affinity of interaction with a novel monoclonal antibody NAA-1 was studied by SPR. In summary, we present an integral strategy for purification, surface immobilization, ligand- and antibody binding studies of functional cannabinoid receptor CB₂.     

Effects of dietary glucose and fructose upon cannabinoid CB1 receptor functionality in the rat brain: A pilot study

Aims

A high consumption of fructose leads not only to peripheral changes in insulin sensitivity and vascular function, but also to central changes in several brain regions. Given the role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the control of energy intake, we undertook a pilot study to determine whether a high fructose diet produced changes in brain CB₁ receptor functionality.

Main methods

Male rats given access ad libitum to normal chow were given either water, glucose or fructose solutions to drink. CB₁ receptor functionality was measured autoradiographically as the increase in [³⁵S]GTPγS binding produced by the agonist CP55,940.

Key findings

Seven regions were investigated: the prefrontal cortex, caudate–putamen, hippocampal CA1–CA3, dentate gyrus, amygdala, and dorsomedial and ventromedial hypothalami. Two-way robust Wilcoxon analyses for each brain region indicated that the dietary treatment did not produce significant main effects upon agonist-stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding in any of the regions, in contrast to a significant main effect upon both leptin and adiponectin levels in the blood. However, a MANCOVA of the data controlling for leptin and adiponectin as co-variables identified a significant effect of glucose and fructose treatment for five weeks upon the [³⁵S]GTPγS response in the ventromedial hypothalamus, a region of importance for regulation of appetite.

Significance

It is concluded from this pilot study that palatable solutions do not produce overt changes in brain CB₁ receptor functionality, although subtle changes in discrete brain regions may occur.     

Preneural transmitters as regulators of embryogenesis. Current state of problem

Our knowledge about the preneural neurotransmitter systems and their functions were based on the old pharmacological and biochemical data that have recently been confirmed and substantially supplemented. Specific components of the preneural serotoninergic and endocannabinoid systems were identified in developing echinoderm embryos using immunocytochemistry, Western immunoelectroblotting, and HPLC-mass spectroscopy. These data were corroborated by the results of pharmacological experiments: it was found that some ligands of serotonin receptors, as well as the agonist of cannabinoid receptors anandamide induced the appearance of abnormal embryonic phenotypes, whose expression depended on the ligand-teratogen concentration. Their appearance was prevented, correspondingly, by serotonin and its lipophilic (or hydrophilic) analogs and antagonists of cannabinoid (CB₁CB₂)-receptors.     

1-Methoxy-, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy- and 11-Hydroxy-1-methoxy-Δ-tetrahydrocannabinols: new selective ligands for the CB2 receptor

Three series of new cannabinoids were prepared and their affinities for the CB₁ and CB₂ cannabinoid recptors were determined. These are the 1-methoxy-3-(1′,1′-dimethylalkyl)-, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy-3-(1′,1′-dimethylalkyl)- and 11-hydroxy-1-methoxy-3-(1′,1′-dimethylalkyl)-Δ⁸-tetrahydrocannabinols, which contain alkyl chains from dimethylethyl to dimethylheptyl appended to C-3 of the cannabinoid. All of these compounds have greater affinity for the CB₂ receptor than for the CB₁ receptor, however only 1-methoxy-3-(1′,1′-dimethylhexyl)-Δ⁸-THC (JWH-229, 6e) has effectively no affinity for the CB₁ receptor (K_i=3134±110 nM) and high affinity for CB₂ (K_i=18±2 nM).     

Association between Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Expression and Akt Signalling in Prostate Cancer

Background

In prostate cancer, tumour expression of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors is associated with a poor prognosis. One explanation for this association comes from experiments with transfected astrocytoma cells, where a high CB receptor expression recruits the Akt signalling survival pathway. In the present study, we have investigated the association between CB₁ receptor expression and the Akt pathway in a well-characterised prostate cancer tissue microarray.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Phosphorylated Akt immunoreactivity (pAkt-IR) scores were available in the database. CB₁ receptor immunoreactivity (CB₁IR) was rescored from previously published data using the same scale as pAkt-IR. There was a highly significant correlation between CB₁IR and pAkt-IR. Further, cases with high expression levels of both biomarkers were much more likely to have a more severe form of the disease at diagnosis than those with low expression levels. The two biomarkers had additive effects, rather than an interaction, upon disease-specific survival.

Conclusions/Significance

The present study provides data that is consistent with the hypothesis that at a high CB₁ receptor expression, the Akt signalling pathway becomes operative.     

Atypical Responsiveness of the Orphan Receptor GPR55 to Cannabinoid Ligands

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors, associated with drugs of abuse, may provide a means to treat pain, mood, and addiction disorders affecting widespread segments of society. Whether the orphan G-protein coupled receptor GPR55 is also a cannabinoid receptor remains unclear as a result of conflicting pharmacological studies. GPR55 has been reported to be activated by exogenous and endogenous cannabinoid compounds but surprisingly also by the endogenous non-cannabinoid mediator lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI). We examined the effects of a representative panel of cannabinoid ligands and LPI on GPR55 using a β-arrestin-green fluorescent protein biosensor as a direct readout of agonist-mediated receptor activation. Our data demonstrate that AM251 and SR141716A (rimonabant), which are cannabinoid antagonists, and the lipid LPI, which is not a cannabinoid receptor ligand, are GPR55 agonists. They possess comparable efficacy in inducing β-arrestin trafficking and, moreover, activate the G-protein-dependent signaling of protein kinase CβII. Conversely, the potent synthetic cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 acts as a GPR55 antagonist/partial agonist. CP55,940 blocks GPR55 internalization, the formation of β-arrestin GPR55 complexes, and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2; CP55,940 produces only a slight amount of protein kinase CβII membrane recruitment but does not stimulate membrane remodeling like LPI, AM251, or rimonabant. Our studies provide a paradigm for measuring the responsiveness of GPR55 to a variety of ligand scaffolds comprising cannabinoid and novel compounds and suggest that at best GPR55 is an atypical cannabinoid responder. The activation of GPR55 by rimonabant may be responsible for some of the off-target effects that led to its removal as a potential obesity therapy.The CB₁² and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors comprise a two-member subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are notable as the targets of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) derivatives found in marijuana. More recently CB₁ receptors along with other GPCRs have been promoted as therapeutic pharmacological targets in the billion dollar weight loss market for controversial drugs such as rimonabant (SR141716A) and Fen-phen. Thus, an important utility of cannabinoid family receptors to society appears to arise from their role in regulating a broad spectrum of addiction-based behaviors, and the addition of new members to the cannabinoid receptor family may have social and economic implications that reach far beyond the initial scientific discovery. As a consequence, the re-classification of an orphan GPCR as a cannabinoid family member should be done with caution requiring strict criteria of receptor activation by THC derivatives or endogenous cannabinoid compounds and a widespread agreement of the results by the scientific community.Marijuana, one of the most widely abused substances (1), mediates many of its psychotropic effects by targeting CB₁ receptors in the central nervous system, but studies with CB₁ and CB₂ knock-out mice indicate that the complex pharmacological properties on pain, mood, and memory exhibited by exogenous cannabinoids and the endogenous arachidonic acid-based endo-cannabinoids, including anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), are not fully explained by their activation of CB₁ and CB₂ (2–4). The CB₁ and CB₂ receptors are 44% identical and signal through G_i/o-mediated pathways. Activation of either receptor is inhibitory for cAMP production via adenylyl cyclase and stimulatory for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (extracellular-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2)) activation (5). However, the failure of these two receptors to account for the full complement of physiological effects observed with cannabinoid ligands has led to the hypothesis that additional cannabinoid-like receptors exist.The orphan GPCR, GPR55, which exhibits only 10–15% homology to the two human cannabinoid receptors (6), is one of a number of plausible cannabinoid family member candidates (7). GPR55 was first identified and mapped to human chromosome 2q37 a decade ago (8). In the human central nervous system, it is predominantly localized to the caudate, putamen, and striatum (8), coupling to Gα₁₃ (9, 10), Gα₁₂, or Gα_q (11).GPR55 has been tested against a number of cannabinoid ligands with mixed results. Observations using a GTPγS functional assay indicate that GPR55 is activated by nanomolar concentrations of the endocannabinoids 2-AG, virodhamine, noladin ether, and palmitoylethanolamine (10) and the atypical cannabinoids Abn-CBD and O-1602 (12) as well as by the drugs CP55,950, HU210, and Δ⁹-THC (11). Exposure of GPR55 to the cannabinoids THC and JWH015 in dorsal root ganglion neurons and in receptor-transfected HEK293 cells correlates with increases of intracellular Ca²⁺ (11). In contrast, GPR55 is insensitive to the CB₁ inverse agonist AM281 and the potent cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 but is antagonized by the marijuana constituent CBD (9, 10). However, Oka et al. (13) reported that GPR55 is not a typical cannabinoid receptor, as numerous endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids, including many mentioned above, had no effect on GPR55 activity. They present compelling data suggesting that the endogenous lipid LPI and its 2-arachidonyl analogs are agonists at GPR55 as a result of their abilities to phosphorylate extracellular-regulated kinase and induce calcium signaling (13, 14). Further studies indicate that LPI and the rimonabant-like CB₁ inverse agonist AM251 induce oscillatory Ca²⁺ release through Gα₁₃ and RhoA (9). These reports were all performed in HEK 293 cells, yet each documented a distinct and conflicting chemical space of agonists that recognized GPR55. To resolve these inconsistencies in classification, an alternative approach for identifying GPR55 ligands that is insensitive to the endogenous complement of cellular receptors could circumvent many of the challenges that have arisen in the measurements of G-protein signaling.β-Arrestins are intracellular proteins that bind and desensitize activated GPCRs and in the process form stable receptor/arrestin signaling complexes (15, 16). β-Arrestin redistribution to the activated membrane-bound receptor represents one of the early intracellular events provoked by agonist binding and, consequently, is less prone to a false positive or negative readout as compared with studying a downstream signaling event as a readout of receptor activation. β-arrestin-green fluorescent chimeras can make this process attractive to monitor by forming remarkably sensitive and specific probes of GPCR activation that are independent of downstream G-protein-mediated signaling (17–19). We have determined GPR55 responsiveness to a representative panel of cannabinoid ligands and LPI in the presence (and absence) of a β-arrestin2-green fluorescent protein (βarr2-GFP) biosensor. Our data demonstrate that LPI, the CB₁ inverse agonist/antagonists SR141716A, and AM251 are GPR55 agonists, and the CB₁ agonist CP55940 is a GPR55 antagonist/partial agonist. These data together with our inability to observe activation of GPR55 by Δ⁹-THC and endocannabinoids indicate that GPR55 should be classified as an atypical cannabinoid receptor at best.