A new NO ledge in Chlamydomonas: when the old nitrate reductase meets amidoxime reducing component to produce nitric oxide

This article comments on: A dual system formed by the ARC and NR molybdoenzymes mediates nitrite‐dependent NO production in Chlamydomonas     

Modulation of nitrate reductase activity by photosynthetic electron transport chain and nitric oxide balance in the red macroalga Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta)

Nitrate reductase (NR), a key enzyme in nitrogen metabolism, has been implicated in the production of nitric oxide (NO) in plants. The effect of photosynthetic electron transport chain inhibitors and NO scavengers or donors on NR activity of Gracilaria chilensis was studied under experimental laboratory conditions. Effective quantum yield (Φ _PSII) and NR activity were significantly diminished by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone, two photosynthetic electron flux inhibitors of photosystem (PS) II and PSI, respectively, but not by diphenyleneiodonium, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, indicating a direct dependence of NR activity on the PSII and PSI electron flux. Nitrate reductase activity was sensitive to a decrease or increase of NO levels when NO scavenger (2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide) and NO donor (sodium nitroprusside) were added. Moreover, the addition of 8Br-cGMP, a secondary signal molecule, stimulated NR activity. These results evidence a modulation of the photosynthetic electron transport chain and NO balance on G. chilensis NR activity. This association could be linked to the crucial tight modulation of nitrogen assimilation and carbon metabolism to guarantee nitrite incorporation into organic compounds and to avoid toxicity by nitrite, reactive oxygen species, or nitric oxide in the cells. Nitric oxide showed to be an important signaling molecule regulating NR activity and cGMP could participate as secondary messenger on this regulation by phosphorylation and desphosphorylation processes.     

Isolation and characterisation of nitrate reductase mutants and regulation of nitrate reductase and nitrogenase in the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum

Summary Chlorate resistant mutants of the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum isolated after N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) mutagenesis were found to be defective/blocked in nitrate reductase (NR).The parent strain possessed active NR in the presence of nitrogen as nitrate and only basal levels of activity in ammonia and N-free grown cultures. Addition of ammonia suppressed the NR activity in the parent strain whereas addition of L-methionine DL-sulphoximine (MSX) restored NR activity. A similar repression by ammonia, glutamine and derepression with MSX were also observed for nitrogenase synthesis.One class of mutants lacked NR activity (nar ^-) whereas the specific activity of NR was low in another class of mutants (nar ^def). Unlike the parent, the mutants synthesized nitrogenase and differentiated heterocysts in the presence of nitrate nitrogen. Uptake studies of nitrite and ammonia in mutants revealed that they possessed both nitrite reductase and glutamine synthetases (GS) at low levels, and the same level respectively in comparison with the parent.     

Binding of spermine and ifenprodil to a purified,soluble regulatory domain of the N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor

The binding of spermine and ifenprodil to the amino terminal regulatory (R) domain of the N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate receptor was studied using purified regulatory domains of the NR1, NR2A and NR2B subunits, termed NR1‐R, NR2A‐R and NR2B‐R. The R domains were over‐expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to near homogeneity. The K_d values for binding of [¹⁴C]spermine to NR1‐R, NR2A‐R and NR2B‐R were 19, 140, and 33 μM, respectively. [³H]Ifenprodil bound to NR1‐R (K_d, 0.18 μM) and NR2B‐R (K_d, 0.21 μM), but not to NR2A‐R at the concentrations tested (0.1–0.8 μM). These K_d values were confirmed by circular dichroism measurements. The K_d values reflected their effective concentrations at intact NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B receptors. The results suggest that effects of spermine and ifenprodil on NMDA receptors occur through binding to the regulatory domains of the NR1, NR2A and NR2B subunits. The binding capacity of spermine or ifenprodil to a mixture of NR1‐R and NR2A‐R or NR1‐R and NR2B‐R was additive with that of each individual R domain. Binding of spermine to NR1‐R and NR2B‐R was not inhibited by ifenprodil and vice versa, indicating that the binding sites for spermine and ifenprodil on NR1‐R and NR2B‐R are distinct.     

Biochemical Characterization of Soybean Mutants Lacking Constitutive NADH:Nitrate Reductase

Two nitrate reductase (NR) mutants were selected for low nitrate reductase (LNR) activity by in vivo NR microassays of M₂ seedlings derived from nitrosomethylurea-mutagenized soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr. cv Williams) seeds. The mutants (LNR-5 and LNR-6) appeared to have normal nitrate-inducible NR activity. Both mutants, however, showed decreased NR activity in vivo and in vitro compared with the wild-type. In vitro FMNH₂-dependent nitrate reduction and Cyt c reductase activity of nitrate-grown plants, and nitrogenous gas evolution during in vivo NR assays of urea-grown plants, were also decreased in the mutants. The latter observation was due to insufficient generation of nitrite substrate, rather than some inherent difference in enzyme between mutant and wild-type plants. When grown on urea, crude extracts of LNR-5 and LNR-6 lines had similar NADPH:NR activities to that of the wild type, but both mutants had very little NADH:NR activity, relative to the wild type. Blue Sepharose columns loaded with NR extract of urea-grown mutants and sequentially eluted with NADPH and NADH yielded a NADPH:NR peak only, while the wild-type yielded both NADPH: and NADH:NR peaks. Activity profiles confirmed the lack of constitutive NADH:NR in the mutants throughout development. The results provide additional support to our claim that wild-type soybean contains three NR isozymes, namely, constitutive NADPH:NR (c₁NR), constitutive NADH:NR (c₂NR), and nitrate-inducible NR (iNR).     

Nitrate reductase activity and nitrate accumulation in in vitro produced axillary shoots,plantlets and seedlings of Pinus pinaster

The initial and induced in vivo Nitrate Reductase Activity, the nitrate accumulation by in vitro-produced axillary shoots and plantlets of Pinus pinaster were compared respectively with those of shoots collected from seedlings and whole plants.The usefulness of the nitrate of the medium used for in vitro axillary shoot formation is demonstrated by the occurrence of initial NR activity in the explants. When fed in a non in vitro situation with a 50 mM KNO₃ solution, they have the same induced capacity to reduce nitrate as do shoots from seedlings, even though the latter accumulate less nitrate. Plants regenerated in vitro exhibit an ability to reduce nitrate similar to that of seedlings. In both types of plants, the Nitrate Reductase potential is greater in roots than in shoots.Abbreviation NR Nitrate Reductase - BA 6-Benzyladenine     

WD40‐REPEAT 5a functions in drought stress tolerance by regulating nitric oxide accumulation in Arabidopsis

Nitric oxide (NO) generation by NO synthase (NOS) in guard cells plays a vital role in stomatal closure for adaptive plant response to drought stress. However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of NOS activity in plants is unclear. Here, by screening yeast deletion mutants with decreased NO accumulation and NOS‐like activity when subjected to H₂O₂ stress, we identified TUP1 as a novel regulator of NOS‐like activity in yeast. Arabidopsis WD40‐REPEAT 5a (WDR5a), a homolog of yeast TUP1, complemented H₂O₂‐induced NO accumulation of a yeast mutant Δtup1, suggesting the conserved role of WDR5a in regulating NO accumulation and NOS‐like activity. This note was further confirmed by using an Arabidopsis RNAi line wdr5a‐1 and two T‐DNA insertion mutants of WDR5a with reduced WDR5a expression, in which both H₂O₂‐induced NO accumulation and stomatal closure were repressed. This was because H₂O₂‐induced NOS‐like activity was inhibited in the mutants compared with that of the wild type. Furthermore, these wdr5a mutants were more sensitive to drought stress as they had reduced stomatal closure and decreased expression of drought‐related genes. Together, our results revealed that WDR5a functions as a novel factor to modulate NOS‐like activity for changes of NO accumulation and stomatal closure in drought stress tolerance.     

The exudate from an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus induces nitric oxide accumulation in Medicago truncatula roots

Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule involved in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. While there is evidence for NO accumulation during legume nodulation, almost no information exists for arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM). Here, we investigated the occurrence of NO in the early stages of Medicago truncatula–Gigaspora margarita interaction, focusing on the plant response to fungal diffusible molecules. NO was visualized in root organ cultures and seedlings by confocal microscopy using the specific probe 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate. Five-minute treatment with the fungal exudate was sufficient to induce significant NO accumulation. The specificity of this response to AM fungi was confirmed by the lack of response in the AM nonhost Arabidopsis thaliana and by analyzing mutants impaired in mycorrhizal capacities. NO buildup resulted to be partially dependent on DMI1, DMI2, and DMI3 functions within the so-called common symbiotic signaling pathway which is shared between AM and nodulation. Significantly, NO accumulation was not induced by the application of purified Nod factor, while lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli, known to elicit defense-related NO production in plants, induced a significantly different response pattern. A slight upregulation of a nitrate reductase (NR) gene and the reduction of NO accumulation when the enzyme is inhibited by tungstate suggest NR as a possible source of NO. Genetic and cellular evidence, therefore, suggests that NO accumulation is a novel component in the signaling pathway that leads to AM symbiosis.     

Strigolactones are required for nitric oxide to induce root elongation in response to nitrogen and phosphate deficiencies in rice

The response of the root system architecture to nutrient deficiencies is critical for sustainable agriculture. Nitric oxide (NO) is considered a key regulator of root growth, although the mechanisms remain unknown. Phenotypic, cellular and genetic analyses were undertaken in rice to explore the role of NO in regulating root growth and strigolactone (SL) signalling under nitrogen‐deficient and phosphate‐deficient conditions (LN and LP). LN‐induced and LP‐induced seminal root elongation paralleled NO production in root tips. NO played an important role in a shared pathway of LN‐induced and LP‐induced root elongation via increased meristem activity. Interestingly, no responses of root elongation were observed in SL d mutants compared with wild‐type plants, although similar NO accumulation was induced by sodium nitroprusside (SNP) application. Application of abamine (the SL inhibitor) reduced seminal root length and pCYCB1;1::GUS expression induced by SNP application in wild type; furthermore, comparison with wild type showed lower SL‐signalling genes in nia2 mutants under control and LN treatments and similar under SNP application. Western blot analysis revealed that NO, similar to SL, triggered proteasome‐mediated degradation of D53 protein levels. Therefore, we presented a novel signalling pathway in which NO‐activated seminal root elongation under LN and LP conditions, with the involvement of SLs.     

Characterization of nitrate reductase-deficient barley mutants

Summary Ten nitrate reductase-deficient Hordeum vulgare mutants were characterized for NADH and FMNH₂ nitrate reductase (NR), cytochrome C reductase (CR) and nitrite reductase (NiR) activities. The mutants sort into four major groups. Group I represented by mutants Az 12, Az 23, Az 29 and Az 30 have low Nr and Cr activities. Group II represented by mutants Az 13, Az 31, Az 33 and Az 34 have low NR activities but intermediate CR activities. Group III represented by mutant Az 28 has low NR activity, but above normal CR activity. Group IV represented by Az 32 has low NADH-NR, low CR, but above normal FMNH₂-NR activity. All ten mutants have elevated NiR activities. None of the ten mutants were constitutive for nitrite reductase activity. Only Az 34 showed a definite high temperature sensitivity when the NADH nitrate reductase activity was compared in the 12 to 26° C range. The mutants Az 12, Az 13, Az 23, Az 28, Az 29, Az 30, Az 31, Az 32 and Az 33 are allelic and were assigned the locus designation nar1. Mutant Az 34 represents a different genetic locus designated nar2. The nar1 gene is codominant and the nar2 gene is recessive.Scientific Paper No. 5463. College of Agriculture Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, Project Nos. 0233 and 0430. Supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants PCM 78-07649 and PCM 78-16025     

Regulation of nitric oxide (NO) production by plant nitrate reductase in vivo and in vitro.

NO (nitric oxide) production from sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.), detached spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea L.), desalted spinach leaf extracts or commercial maize (Zea mays L.) leaf nitrate reductase (NR, EC 1.6.6.1) was continuously followed as NO emission into the gas phase by chemiluminescence detection, and its response to post-translational NR modulation was examined in vitro and in vivo. NR (purified or in crude extracts) in vitro produced NO at saturating NADH and nitrite concentrations at about 1% of its nitrate reduction capacity. The K(m) for nitrite was relatively high (100 microM) compared to nitrite concentrations in illuminated leaves (10 microM). NO production was competitively inhibited by physiological nitrate concentrations (K(i)=50 microM). Importantly, inactivation of NR in crude extracts by protein phosphorylation with MgATP in the presence of a protein phosphatase inhibitor also inhibited NO production. Nitrate-fertilized plants or leaves emitted NO into purified air. The NO emission was lower in the dark than in the light, but was generally only a small fraction of the total NR activity in the tissue (about 0.01-0.1%). In order to check for a modulation of NO production in vivo, NR was artificially activated by treatments such as anoxia, feeding uncouplers or AICAR (a cell permeant 5'-AMP analogue). Under all these conditions, leaves were accumulating nitrite to concentrations exceeding those in normal illuminated leaves up to 100-fold, and NO production was drastically increased especially in the dark. NO production by leaf extracts or intact leaves was unaffected by nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. It is concluded that in non-elicited leaves NO is produced in variable quantities by NR depending on the total NR activity, the NR activation state and the cytosolic nitrite and nitrate concentration.     

Nitric oxide emission from tobacco leaves and cell suspensions: rate limiting factors and evidence for the involvement of mitochondrial electron transport

Quantitative data on nitric oxide (NO) production by plants, and knowledge of participating reactions and rate limiting factors are still rare. We quantified NO emission from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) wild-type leaves, from nitrate reductase (NR)- or nitrite reductase (NiR)-deficient leaves, from WT- or from NR-deficient cell suspensions and from mitochondria purified from leaves or cells, by following NO emission through chemiluminescence detection. In all systems, NO emission was exclusively due to the reduction of nitrite to NO, and the nitrite concentration was an important rate limiting factor. Using inhibitors and purified mitochondria, mitochondrial electron transport was identified as a major source for reduction of nitrite to NO, in addition to NR. NiR and xanthine dehydrogenase appeared to be not involved. At equal respiratory activity, mitochondria from suspension cells had a much higher capacity to produce NO than leaf mitochondria. NO emission in vivo by NiR-mutant leaves (which was not nitrite limited) was proportional to photosynthesis (high in light +CO(2), low in light -CO(2), or in the dark). With most systems including mitochondrial preparations, NO emission was low in air (and darkness for leaves), but high under anoxia (nitrogen). In contrast, NO emission by purified NR was not much different in air and nitrogen. The low aerobic NO emission of darkened leaves and cell suspensions was not due to low cytosolic NADH, and appeared only partly affected by oxygen-dependent NO scavenging. The relative contribution of NR and mitochondria to nitrite-dependent NO production is estimated.