p63 and p73: roles in development and tumor formation

The tumor suppressor p53 is critically important in the cellular damage response and is the founding member of a family of proteins. All three genes regulate cell cycle and apoptosis after DNA damage. However, despite a remarkable structural and partly functional similarity among p53, p63, and p73, mouse knockout studies revealed an unexpected functional diversity among them. p63 and p73 knockouts exhibit severe developmental abnormalities but no increased cancer susceptibility, whereas this picture is reversed for p53 knockouts. Neither p63 nor p73 is the target of inactivating mutations in human cancers. Genomic organization is more complex in p63 and p73, largely the result of an alternative internal promoter generating NH2-terminally deleted dominant-negative proteins that engage in inhibitory circuits within the family. Deregulated dominant-negative p73 isoforms might play an active oncogenic role in some human cancers. Moreover, COOH-terminal extensions specific for p63 and p73 enable further unique protein-protein interactions with regulatory pathways involved in development, differentiation, proliferation, and damage response. Thus, p53 family proteins take on functions within a wide biological spectrum stretching from development (p63 and p73), DNA damage response via apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (p53, TAp63, and TAp73), chemosensitivity of tumors (p53 and TAp73), and immortalization and oncogenesis (DeltaNp73).     

The p73 DNA binding domain displays enhanced stability relative to its homologue, the tumor suppressor p53, and exhibits cooperative DNA binding

The p53 protein family is involved in the control of an intricate network of genes implicated in cell cycle, through to germ line integrity and development. Although the role of p53 is well-established, the intrinsic nature of its homologue p73 has yet to be fully elucidated. Here, the biochemical characterization and homology-based modeling of the p73 protein is presented and the implications for its function(s) examined. The DNA binding domains (DBDs) of p53, p63, and p73 bind to the specific target site of a 30-mer gadd45 dsDNA, as tested by EMSA. The monomeric DBDs bind cooperatively forming tetrameric complexes. However, a larger construct consisting of p73 DBD plus TET domain (p73 CT) and the corresponding p53 DBD plus TET domain (p53 CT) bind gadd45 differently than the respective DBDs. Significantly, p73 DBD exhibited enhanced thermodynamic stability relative to the p53 DBD but not compared to p63 DBD as shown by DSC, CD, and equilibrium unfolding. The p73 CT is less stable than p73 DBD. The modeling data show distinct electrostatic surfaces of p73 and p53 dimers when bound to DNA. Specifically, the p73 surface is less complementary for DNA binding, which may account for the differences in affinity and specificity for p53 REs. These stability and DNA binding data for p73 in vitro enhance and complement our understanding of the role of the p73 protein in vivo and could be exploited in designing strategies for cancer therapy in places where p53 is mutated.     

Structural diversity of p63 and p73 isoforms

AbstractThe p53 protein family is the most studied protein family of all. Sequence analysis and structure determination have revealed a high similarity of crucial domains between p53, p63 and p73. Functional studies, however, have shown a wide variety of different tasks in tumor suppression, quality control and development. Here we review the structure and organization of the individual domains of p63 and p73, the interaction of these domains in the context of full-length proteins and discuss the evolutionary origin of this protein family. Facts

• Distinct physiological roles/functions are performed by specific isoforms.
• The non-divided transactivation domain of p63 has a constitutively high activity while the transactivation domains of p53/p73 are divided into two subdomains that are regulated by phosphorylation.
• Mdm2 binds to all three family members but ubiquitinates only p53.
• TAp63α forms an autoinhibited dimeric state while all other vertebrate p53 family isoforms are constitutively tetrameric.
• The oligomerization domain of p63 and p73 contain an additional helix that is necessary for stabilizing the tetrameric states. During evolution this helix got lost independently in different phylogenetic branches, while the DNA binding domain became destabilized and the transactivation domain split into two subdomains.

Open questions

• Is the autoinhibitory mechanism of mammalian TAp63α conserved in p53 proteins of invertebrates that have the same function of genomic quality control in germ cells?
• What is the physiological function of the p63/p73 SAM domains?
• Do the short isoforms of p63 and p73 have physiological functions?
• What are the roles of the N-terminal elongated TAp63 isoforms, TA* and GTA?

Subject terms: X-ray crystallography, Solution-state NMR     

TAp63 plays compensatory roles in p53-deficient cancer cells under genotoxic stress

p53, p63, and p73 belong to the p53 family of proteins, which mediate development, differentiation, and various other cellular responses. p53 is involved in many anti-cancer mechanisms, such as cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and the maintenance of genomic integrity. The p63 gene is controlled by two promoters that direct the expression of two isoforms, one with and one without transactivating properties, known as TAp63 and ΔNp63. In this study, p53-deficient cells (Hep3B and PC-3) and p53-expressing cells (A549 and HepG2) were treated with doxorubicin to examine the possible roles of TAp63 in these cells under genotoxic stress; TAp63 expression was induced in p53-deficient cell lines, but not in p53-expressing cell lines. The ectopic expression of p53 in p53-deficient cells (Hep3B) reduced TAp63 promoter activity, and knockdown of TAp63 attenuated doxorubicin-induced cell growth arrest by promoting cell cycle progression, leading to an increase in the percentage of G(2)/M cells. Moreover, knockdown of TAp63 increased cell sensitivity to doxorubicin-induced genomic damage. Our results suggest that TAp63 may play a compensatory role in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage repair in p53-deficient cancer cells.     

The p53 family: same response, different signals?

TP53, the gene that encodes p53, is a well-defined tumor suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in human cancers. Recently, two proteins homologous to p53, termed p73 and p63, were identified. Current data indicate that both p73 and p63, like p53, can induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, suggesting that they might also be tumor suppressors. However, the physiological signals that can regulate p53, for example, DNA damage, have no effect on p73, as tested in several cell lines. Furthermore, the signaling pathways by which p73 (and possibly p63) induces cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis appear to be similar to those of p53, but also have important differences. Thus, the p53 family proteins are closely related but might have distinct physiological functions.     

The role of p63 in germ cell apoptosis in the developing testis

The fetal and neonatal development of male germ cells (gonocytes) is a poorly understood but crucial process for establishing fertility. In rodents, gonocytes go through two phases of proliferation accompanied by apoptosis and separated by a quiescent period during the end of fetal development. P63 is a member of the P53 gene family that yields six isoforms. We detected only the p63 protein and no p53 and p73 in the nucleus of the gonocytes of mouse testes. We report for the first time the ontogeny of each p63 mRNA isoform during testis development. We observed a strong expression of p63gamma mRNA and protein when gonocytes are in the quiescent period. In vitro treatment with retinoic acid prevented gonocytes from entering the quiescent period and was correlated with a reduced production of p63gamma isoform mRNA. We investigated the function of p63 by studying the testicular phenotype of P63-null mice. P63 invalidation slightly, but significantly increased the number of gonocytes counted during the quiescent period. As P63-null animals die at birth we used an original organ culture that mimicked neonatal in vivo development to study further the testicular development. P63 invalidation resulted in a sharply increased number of gonocytes during the culture period due to a decrease in spontaneous apoptosis with no change in proliferation. P63 invalidation also caused abnormal morphologies in the germ cells that were also found in P63(+/-) adult male mice. Thus, p63 appears as an important regulator of germ cell development.