Site-Specific Phosphorylation of VEGFR2 Is Mediated by Receptor Trafficking: Insights from a Computational Model

Matrix-binding isoforms and non-matrix-binding isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are both capable of stimulating vascular remodeling, but the resulting blood vessel networks are structurally and functionally different. Here, we develop and validate a computational model of the binding of soluble and immobilized ligands to VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), the endosomal trafficking of VEGFR2, and site-specific VEGFR2 tyrosine phosphorylation to study differences in induced signaling between these VEGF isoforms. In capturing essential features of VEGFR2 signaling and trafficking, our model suggests that VEGFR2 trafficking parameters are largely consistent across multiple endothelial cell lines. Simulations demonstrate distinct localization of VEGFR2 phosphorylated on Y1175 and Y1214. This is the first model to clearly show that differences in site-specific VEGFR2 activation when stimulated with immobilized VEGF compared to soluble VEGF can be accounted for by altered trafficking of VEGFR2 without an intrinsic difference in receptor activation. The model predicts that Neuropilin-1 can induce differences in the surface-to-internal distribution of VEGFR2. Simulations also show that ligated VEGFR2 and phosphorylated VEGFR2 levels diverge over time following stimulation. Using this model, we identify multiple key levers that alter how VEGF binding to VEGFR2 results in different coordinated patterns of multiple downstream signaling pathways. Specifically, simulations predict that VEGF immobilization, interactions with Neuropilin-1, perturbations of VEGFR2 trafficking, and changes in expression or activity of phosphatases acting on VEGFR2 all affect the magnitude, duration, and relative strength of VEGFR2 phosphorylation on tyrosines 1175 and 1214, and they do so predictably within our single consistent model framework.     

Neuropilin-1 binds to VEGF121 and regulates endothelial cell migration and sprouting

Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) was first described as a receptor for the axon guidance molecule, Semaphorin3A, regulating the development of the nervous system. It was later shown that NRP1 is an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), specifically VEGF(165). Much interest has been placed on the role of the various VEGF isoforms in vascular biology. Here we report that blocking NRP1 function, using a recently described antibody that inhibits VEGF(165) binding to NRP1, surprisingly reduces VEGF(121)-induced migration and sprout formation of endothelial cells. Intrigued by this observation, direct binding studies of NRP1 to various VEGF isoforms were performed. We show that VEGF(121) binds directly to NRP1; however, unlike VEGF(165), VEGF(121) is not sufficient to bridge the NRP1.VEGFR2 complex. Additionally, we show that VEGFR2 enhances VEGF(165), but not VEGF(121) binding to NRP1. We propose a new model for NRP1 interactions with various VEGF isoforms.     

r84, a Novel Therapeutic Antibody against Mouse and Human VEGF with Potent Anti-Tumor Activity and Limited Toxicity Induction

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is critical for physiological and pathological angiogenesis. Within the tumor microenvironment, VEGF functions as an endothelial cell survival factor, permeability factor, mitogen, and chemotactic agent. The majority of these functions are mediated by VEGF-induced activation of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), a high affinity receptor tyrosine kinase expressed by endothelial cells and other cell types in the tumor microenvironment. VEGF can also ligate other cell surface receptors including VEGFR1 and neuropilin-1 and -2. However, the importance of VEGF-induced activation of these receptors in tumorigenesis is still unclear. We report the development and characterization of r84, a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds human and mouse VEGF and selectively blocks VEGF from interacting with VEGFR2 but does not interfere with VEGF∶VEGFR1 interaction. Selective blockade of VEGF binding to VEGFR2 by r84 is shown through ELISA, receptor binding assays, receptor activation assays, and cell-based functional assays. Furthermore, we show that r84 has potent anti-tumor activity and does not alter tissue histology or blood and urine chemistry after chronic high dose therapy in mice. In addition, chronic r84 therapy does not induce elevated blood pressure levels in some models. The ability of r84 to specifically block VEGF∶VEGFR2 binding provides a valuable tool for the characterization of VEGF receptor pathway activation during tumor progression and highlights the utility and safety of selective blockade of VEGF-induced VEGFR2 signaling in tumors.     

Neuropilin-1-VEGFR-2 complexing requires the PDZ-binding domain of neuropilin-1

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) acts as a hierarchically high switch of the angiogenic cascade by interacting with its high affinity VEGF receptors and with neuropilin co-receptors. VEGF(165) binds to both Neuropilin-1 (NP-1) and VEGFR-2, and it is believed that ligand binding forms an extracellular bridge between both molecules. This leads to complex formation, thereby enhancing VEGFR-2 phosphorylation and subsequent signaling. We found that inhibition of VEGF receptor (VEGFR) phosphorylation reduced complex formation between NP-1 and VEGFR-2, suggesting a functional role of the cytoplasmic domain of VEGFR-2 for complex formation. Correspondingly, deleting the PDZ-binding domain of NP-1 decreased complex formation, indicating that extracellular VEGF(165) binding is not sufficient for VEGFR-2-NP-1 interaction. Synectin is an NP-1 PDZ-binding domain-interacting molecule. Experiments in Synectin-deficient endothelial cells revealed reduced VEGFR-2-NP-1 complex formation, suggesting a role for Synectin in VEGFR-2-NP-1 signaling. Taken together, the experiments have identified a novel mechanism of NP-1 interaction with VEGFR-2, which involves the cytoplasmic domain of NP-1.     

Model of competitive binding of vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor to VEGF receptors on endothelial cells

Placental growth factor (PlGF) competes with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for binding to VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 but does not bind VEGFR2. Experiments show that PlGF can augment the response to VEGF in pathological angiogenesis and in models of endothelial cell survival, migration, and proliferation. This synergy has been hypothesized to be due to a combination of the following: signaling by PlGF through VEGFR1 and displacement of VEGF from VEGFR1 to VEGFR2 by PlGF, causing increased signaling through VEGFR2. In this study, the relative contribution of PlGF-induced VEGF displacement to the synergy is quantified using a mathematical model of ligand-receptor binding to examine the effect on ligand-receptor complex formation of VEGF and PlGF acting together. Parameters specific to the VEGF-PlGF system are used based on existing data. The model is used to simulate in silico a specific in vitro experiment in which VEGF-PlGF synergy is observed. We show that, whereas a significant change in the formation of endothelial surface growth factor-VEGFR1 complexes is predicted in the presence of PlGF, the increase in the number of VEGFR2-containing signaling complexes is less significant; these results were shown to be robust to significant variation in the kinetic parameters of the model. Synergistic effects observed in that experiment thus appear unlikely to be due to VEGF displacement but to a shift from VEGF-VEGFR1 to PlGF-VEGFR1 complexes and an increase in total VEGFR1 complexes. These results suggest that VEGFR1 signaling can be functional in adult-derived endothelial cells.     

Expression of VEGF Receptors on Endothelial Cells in Mouse Skeletal Muscle

VEGFR surface localization plays a critical role in converting extracellular VEGF signaling towards angiogenic outcomes, and the quantitative characterization of these parameters is critical for advancing computational models; however the levels of these receptors on blood vessels is currently unknown. Therefore our aim is to quantitatively determine the VEGFR localization on endothelial cells from mouse hindlimb skeletal muscles. We contextualize this VEGFR quantification through comparison to VEGFR-levels on cells in vitro. Using quantitative fluorescence we measure and compare the levels of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 on endothelial cells isolated from C57BL/6 and BALB/c gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior hindlimb muscles. Fluorescence measurements are calibrated using beads with known numbers of phycoerythrin molecules. The data show a 2-fold higher VEGFR1 surface localization relative to VEGFR2 with 2,000–3,700 VEGFR1/endothelial cell and 1,300–2,000 VEGFR2/endothelial cell. We determine that endothelial cells from the highly glycolytic muscle, tibialis anterior, contain 30% higher number of VEGFR1 surface receptors than gastrocnemius; BALB/c mice display ∼17% higher number of VEGFR1 than C57BL/6. When we compare these results to mouse fibroblasts in vitro, we observe high levels of VEGFR1 (35,800/cell) and very low levels of VEGFR2 (700/cell), while in human endothelial cells in vitro, we observe that the balance of VEGFRs is inverted, with higher levels VEGFR2 (5,800/cell) and lower levels of VEGFR1 (1,800/cell). Our studies also reveal significant cell-to-cell heterogeneity in receptor expression, and the quantification of these dissimilarities ex vivo for the first time provides insight into the balance of anti-angiogenic or modulatory (VEGFR1) and pro-angiogenic (VEGFR2) signaling.     

Dimerization of VEGF receptors and implications for signal transduction: a computational study

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent cytokine involved in the induction of neovascularization. Secreted as a cysteine-linked dimer, it has two binding sites at opposite poles through which it may bind VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), receptor tyrosine kinases found on the surface of endothelial and other cells. The binding of a VEGF molecule to two VEGFR molecules induces transphosphorylation of the intracellular domains of the receptors, leading to signal transduction. The dominant mechanism of receptor dimerization is not clear: the receptors may be present in an inactive pre-dimerized form, VEGF binding first to one of the receptors, the second receptor then ideally located for dimerization; or VEGF may bind receptor monomers on the cell surface, which then diffuse and bind to available unligated receptor monomers to complete the activation. Both processes take place and one or other may dominate on different cell types. We demonstrate the impact of dimerization mechanism on the binding of VEGF to the cell surface and on the formation of active signaling receptor complexes. We describe two methods to determine which process dominates, based on binding and phosphorylation assays. The presence of two VEGF receptor populations, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, can result in receptor heterodimer formation. Our simulations predict that heterodimers will comprise 10-50% of the active, signaling VEGF receptor complexes, and that heterodimers will form at the expense of homodimers of VEGFR1 when VEGFR2 populations are larger. These results have significant implications for VEGF signal transduction and interpretation of experimental studies. These results may be applicable to other ligand-receptor pairs, in particular PDGF.     

Thrombospondin-1 inhibits VEGF receptor-2 signaling by disrupting its association with CD47

Thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) can inhibit angiogenic responses directly by interacting with VEGF and indirectly by engaging several endothelial cell TSP1 receptors. We now describe a more potent mechanism by which TSP1 inhibits VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) activation through engaging its receptor CD47. CD47 ligation is known to inhibit downstream signaling targets of VEGFR2, including endothelial nitric-oxide synthase and soluble guanylate cyclase, but direct effects on VEGFR2 have not been examined. Based on FRET and co-immunoprecipitation, CD47 constitutively associated with VEGFR2. Ligation of CD47 by TSP1 abolished resonance energy transfer with VEGFR2 and inhibited phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and its downstream target Akt without inhibiting VEGF binding to VEGFR2. The inhibitory activity of TSP1 in large vessel and microvascular endothelial cells was replicated by a recombinant domain of the protein containing its CD47-binding site and by a CD47-binding peptide derived from this domain but not by the CD36-binding domain of TSP1. Inhibition of VEGFR2 phosphorylation was lost when CD47 expression was suppressed in human endothelial cells and in murine CD47-null cells. These results reveal that anti-angiogenic signaling through CD47 is highly redundant and extends beyond inhibition of nitric oxide signaling to global inhibition of VEGFR2 signaling.     

Skeletal muscle VEGF gradients in peripheral arterial disease: simulations of rest and exercise

VEGF is a key promoter of angiogenesis and a major target of proangiogenic therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Greater understanding of VEGF angiogenic signaling and guidance by gradients for new capillaries will aid in developing new proangiogenic therapies and improving existing treatments. However, in vivo measurements of VEGF concentration gradients at the cell scale are currently impossible. We have developed a computational model to quantify VEGF distribution in extensor digitorum longus skeletal muscle using measurements of VEGF, VEGF receptor (VEGFR), and neuropilin-1 (NRP1) expression in an experimental model of rat PAD. VEGF is secreted by myocytes, diffuses through and interacts with extracellular matrix and basement membranes, and binds VEGFRs and NRP1 on endothelial cell surfaces of blood vessels. We simulate the effects of increased NRP1 expression and of therapeutic exercise training on VEGF gradients, receptor signaling, and angiogenesis. Our study predicts that angiogenic therapy for PAD may be achieved not only through VEGF upregulation but also through modulation of VEGFRs and NRP1. We predict that expression of 10(4) NRP1/cell can increase VEGF binding to receptors by 1.7-fold (vs. no NRP1); in nonexercise-trained muscle with PAD, angiogenesis is hindered due to limited VEGF upregulation, signaling, and gradients; in exercise-trained muscle, VEGF signaling is enhanced by upregulation of VEGFRs and NRP1, and VEGF signaling is strongest within the first week of exercise therapy; and hypoxia-induced VEGF release is important to direct angiogenesis towards unperfused tissue.     

Blocking autocrine VEGF signaling by sunitinib,an anti-cancer drug,promotes embryonic stem cell self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming

Maintaining the self-renewal of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) could be achieved by activating the extrinsic signaling, i.e., the use of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), or blocking the intrinsic differentiation pathways, i.e., the use of GSK3 and MEK inhibitors (2i). Here we found that even in medium supplemented with LIF, mESCs still tend to differentiate toward meso-endoderm lineages after long-term culture and the culture spontaneously secretes vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs). Blocking VEGF signaling with sunitinib, an anti-cancer drug and a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor mainly targeting VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), is capable of maintaining the mESCs in the undifferentiated state without the need for feeder cells or LIF. Sunitinib facilitates the derivation of mESCs from blastocysts, and the mESCs maintained in sunitinib-containing medium remain pluripotent and are able to contribute to chimeric mice. Sunitinib also promotes iPSC generation from MEFs with only Oct4. Knocking down VEGFR2 or blocking it with neutralizing antibody mimicks the effect of sunitinib, indicating that blocking VEGF/VEGFR signaling is indeed beneficial to the self-renewal of mESCs. We also found that hypoxia-inducible factor alpha (HIF1α) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress are involved in the production of VEGF in mESCs. Blocking both pathways inhibits the expression of VEGF and prevents spontaneous differentiation of mESCs. Interestingly, LIF may also exert its effect by downregulating HIF1α and ER stress pathways and subsequent VEGF expression. These results indicate the existence of an intrinsic differentiation pathway in mESCs by activating the autocrine VEGF signaling. Blocking VEGF signaling with sunitinib or other small molecules help to maintain the mESCs in the ground state of pluripotency.     

KRIT1 Protein Depletion Modifies Endothelial Cell Behavior via Increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling

Disruption of endothelial cell-cell contact is a key event in many cardiovascular diseases and a characteristic of pathologically activated vascular endothelium. The CCM (cerebral cavernous malformation) family of proteins (KRIT1 (Krev-interaction trapped 1), PDCD10, and CCM2) are critical regulators of endothelial cell-cell contact and vascular homeostasis. Here we show novel regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in KRIT1-depleted endothelial cells. Loss of KRIT1 and PDCD10, but not CCM2, increases nuclear β-catenin signaling and up-regulates VEGF-A protein expression. In KRIT1-depleted cells, increased VEGF-A levels led to increased VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) activation and subsequent alteration of cytoskeletal organization, migration, and barrier function and to in vivo endothelial permeability in KRIT1-deficient animals. VEGFR2 activation also increases β-catenin phosphorylation but is only partially responsible for KRIT1 depletion-dependent disruption of cell-cell contacts. Thus, VEGF signaling contributes to modifying endothelial function in KRIT1-deficient cells and microvessel permeability in Krit1^+/− mice; however, VEGF signaling is likely not the only contributor to disrupted endothelial cell-cell contacts in the absence of KRIT1.     

Selective Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor‐2 (VEGFR‐2) Identifies a Central Role for VEGFR‐2 in Human Aortic Endothelial Cell Responses to VEGF

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) are considered essential for angiogenesis. The VEGFR‐family proteins consist of VEGFR‐1/Flt‐1, VEGFR‐2/KDR/Flk‐1, and VEGFR‐3/Flt‐4. Among these, VEGFR‐2 is thought to be principally responsible for angiogenesis. However, the precise role of VEGFRs1–3 in endothelial cell biology and angiogenesis remains unclear due in part to the lack of VEGFR‐specific inhibitors. We used the newly described, highly selective anilinoquinazoline inhibitor of VEGFR‐2 tyrosine kinase, ZM323881 (5‐[[7‐(benzyloxy) quinazolin‐4‐yl]amino]‐4‐fluoro‐2‐methylphenol), to explore the role of VEGFR‐2 in endothelial cell function. Consistent with its reported effects on VEGFR‐2 [IC(50) < 2 nM], ZM323881 inhibited activation of VEGFR‐2, but not of VEGFR‐1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor. We studied the effects of VEGF on human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs), which express VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2, but not VEGFR‐3, in the absence or presence of ZM323881. Inhibition of VEGFR‐2 blocked activation of extracellular regulated‐kinase, p38, Akt, and endothelial nitric oxide synthetase (eNOS) by VEGF, but did not inhibit p38 activation by the VEGFR‐1‐specific ligand, placental growth factor (PlGF). Inhibition of VEGFR‐2 also perturbed VEGF‐induced membrane extension, cell migration, and tube formation by HAECs. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 inhibition also reversed VEGF‐stimulated phosphorylation of CrkII and its Src homology 2 (SH2)‐binding protein p130^Cas, which are known to play a pivotal role in regulating endothelial cell migration. Inhibition of VEGFR‐2 thus blocked all VEGF‐induced endothelial cellular responses tested, supporting that the catalytic activity of VEGFR‐2 is critical for VEGF signaling and/or that VEGFR‐2 may function in a heterodimer with VEGFR‐1 in human vascular endothelial cells.     

Computational Model of Gab1/2-Dependent VEGFR2 Pathway to Akt Activation

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signal transduction is central to angiogenesis in development and in pathological conditions such as cancer, retinopathy and ischemic diseases. However, no detailed mass-action models of VEGF receptor signaling have been developed. We constructed and validated the first computational model of VEGFR2 trafficking and signaling, to study the opposing roles of Gab1 and Gab2 in regulation of Akt phosphorylation in VEGF-stimulated endothelial cells. Trafficking parameters were optimized against 5 previously published in vitro experiments, and the model was validated against six independent published datasets. The model showed agreement at several key nodes, involving scaffolding proteins Gab1, Gab2 and their complexes with Shp2. VEGFR2 recruitment of Gab1 is greater in magnitude, slower, and more sustained than that of Gab2. As Gab2 binds VEGFR2 complexes more transiently than Gab1, VEGFR2 complexes can recycle and continue to participate in other signaling pathways. Correspondingly, the simulation results show a log-linear relationship between a decrease in Akt phosphorylation and Gab1 knockdown while a linear relationship was observed between an increase in Akt phosphorylation and Gab2 knockdown. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated the importance of initial-concentration ratios of antagonistic molecular species (Gab1/Gab2 and PI3K/Shp2) in determining Akt phosphorylation profiles. It also showed that kinetic parameters responsible for transient Gab2 binding affect the system at specific nodes. This model can be expanded to study multiple signaling contexts and receptor crosstalk and can form a basis for investigation of therapeutic approaches, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), overexpression of key signaling proteins or knockdown experiments.     

Tetraspanin CD63 Promotes Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2-β1 Integrin Complex Formation,Thereby Regulating Activation and Downstream Signaling in Endothelial Cells in Vitro and in Vivo

CD63 is a member of the transmembrane-4 glycoprotein superfamily (tetraspanins) implicated in the regulation of membrane protein trafficking, leukocyte recruitment, and adhesion processes. We have investigated the involvement of CD63 in endothelial cell (EC) signaling downstream of β1 integrin and VEGF. We report that silencing of CD63 in primary ECs arrested capillary sprouting and tube formation in vitro because of impaired adhesion and migration of ECs. Mechanistically, CD63 associated with both β1 integrin and the main VEGF receptor on ECs, VEGFR2. Our data suggest that CD63 serves to bridge between β1 integrin and VEGFR2 because CD63 silencing disrupted VEGFR2-β1 integrin complex formation identified using proximity ligation assays. Signaling downstream of β1 integrin and VEGFR2 was attenuated in CD63-silenced cells, although their cell surface expression levels remained unaffected. CD63 was furthermore required for efficient internalization of VEGFR2 in response to VEGF. Importantly, systemic delivery of VEGF failed to potently induce VEGFR2 phosphorylation and downstream signaling in CD63-deficient mouse lungs. Taken together, our findings demonstrate a previously unrecognized role for CD63 in coordinated integrin and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in vitro and in vivo.     

Phosphorylation of Dab2 is involved in inhibited VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling induced by downregulation of syndecan‐1 in glomerular endothelial cell

Disabled‐2 (Dab2) and PAR‐3 (partitioning defective 3) are reported to play critical roles in maintaining retinal microvascular endothelial cells biology by regulating VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling. The role of Dab2 and PAR‐3 in glomerular endothelial cell (GEnC) is unclear. In this study, we found that, no matter whether with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment or not, decreased expression of Dab2 could lead to cell apoptosis by preventing activation of VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling in GEnC, accompanied by reduced membrane VEGFR‐2 expression. And silencing of PAR‐3 gene expression caused increased apoptosis of GEnC by inhibiting activation of VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling and membrane VEGFR‐2 expression. In our previous research, we found that the silencing of syndecan‐1 gene expression inhibited VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling by modulating internalization of VEGFR‐2. And our further research demonstrated that downregulation of syndecan‐1 lead to no significant change in the expression of Dab2 and PAR‐3 both at messenger RNA and protein levels in GEnC, while phosphorylation of Dab2 was significantly increased in GEnC transfected with Dab2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) compared with control siRNA. Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) could induce phosphorylation of Dab2, thus negatively regulating VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling. And we found that decreased expression of syndecan‐1 lead to activation of aPKC, and aPKC inhibitor treatment could block phosphorylation of Dab2 in GEnC. Besides, aPKC inhibitor treatment could activate VEGF‐VGEFR‐2 signaling in GEnC transfected with syndecan‐1 siRNA in a dose‐dependent manner. In conclusion, we speculated that phosphorylation of Dab2 is involved in preventing activation of VEGF‐VEGFR‐2 signaling in GEnC transfected with syndecan‐1 siRNA. This provides a new target for the therapy of GEnC injury and kidney disease.     

Neuropilin-1 signaling through p130Cas tyrosine phosphorylation is essential for growth factor-dependent migration of glioma and endothelial cells

Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) is a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and plays an important role in mediating cell motility. However, the NRP1 signaling pathways important for cell motility are poorly understood. Here we report that p130(Cas) tyrosine phosphorylation is stimulated by hepatocyte growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor in U87MG glioma cells and VEGF in endothelial cells and is dependent on NRP1 via its intracellular domain. In endothelial cells, NRP1 silencing reduced, but did not prevent, VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) phosphorylation, while expression of a mutant form of NRP1 lacking the intracellular domain (NRP1ΔC) did not affect receptor phosphorylation in U87MG cells or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). In HUVECs, NRP1 was also required for VEGF-induced phosphorylation of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2, which was necessary for p130(Cas) phosphorylation. Importantly, knockdown of NRP1 or p130(Cas) or expression of either NRP1ΔC or a non-tyrosine-phosphorylatable substrate domain mutant protein (p130(Cas15F)) was sufficient to inhibit growth factor-mediated migration of glioma and endothelial cells. These data demonstrate for the first time the importance of the NRP1 intracellular domain in mediating a specific signaling pathway downstream of several receptor tyrosine kinases and identify a critical role for a novel NRP1-p130(Cas) pathway in the regulation of chemotaxis.     

In silico pharmacokinetic and molecular docking studies of small molecules derived from Indigofera aspalathoides Vahl targeting receptor tyrosine kinases

Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting vascular network that plays an important role in the tumor growth, invasion and metastasis. Anti-angiogenesis targeting tyrosine kinases such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) constitutes a successful target for the treatment of cancer. In this work, molecular docking studies of three bioflavanoid such as indigocarpan, mucronulatol, indigocarpan diacetate and two diterpenes namely erythroxydiol X and Y derived from Indigofera aspalathoides as PDGFRβ and VEGFR2 inhibitors were performed using computational tools. The crystal structures of two target proteins were retrieved from PDB website. Among the five compounds investigated, indigocarpan exhibited potent binding energy ΔG = -7.04 kcal/mol with VEGFR2 and ΔG = -4.82 with PDGFRβ compared to commercially available anti-angiogenic drug sorafenib (positive control). Our results strongly suggested that indigocarpan is a potent angiogenesis inhibitor as ascertained by its potential interaction with VEGFR2 and PDGFRβ. This hypothesis provides a better insight to control metastasis by blocking angiogenesis.