A novel aminopeptidase associated with the 60 kDa chaperonin in the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

The chaperonins are high-molecular-weight protein complexes having a characteristic double-ring toroidal shape; they are thought to aid the folding of denatured or newly synthesized polypeptides. These proteins exist as two functionally similar but distantly related families, one including the bacterial and organellar chaperonins and the other (termed the CCT-TRiC family) including the chaperonins of the Archaea and the eukaryotes. The CCT-TRiC chaperonins, particularly their archeal members, are less well known than their bacterial counterparts, and their main cellular function is still doubtful. In this work, we report that the chaperonin of the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus interacts with several polypeptides other than the two subunits that constitute the 18-mer double-ring structure. We have cloned and sequenced the gene encoding one 90 kDa chaperonin-associated protein and have shown, using biochemical assays, that the product is an enzyme belonging to the family of zinc-dependent aminopeptidases. The Sulfolobus protein shows maximal homology to eukaryotic (yeast and mouse) aminopeptidases. It contains a leucine zipper motif and can be phosphorylated by an unidentified kinase present in the cell extracts. The possible significance of an association between an aminopeptidase and a chaperonin is discussed.     

Essential function of the built-in lid in the allosteric regulation of eukaryotic and archaeal chaperonins

Chaperonins are allosteric double-ring ATPases that mediate cellular protein folding. ATP binding and hydrolysis control opening and closing of the central chaperonin chamber, which transiently provides a protected environment for protein folding. During evolution, two strategies to close the chaperonin chamber have emerged. Archaeal and eukaryotic group II chaperonins contain a built-in lid, whereas bacterial chaperonins use a ring-shaped cofactor as a detachable lid. Here we show that the built-in lid is an allosteric regulator of group II chaperonins, which helps synchronize the subunits within one ring and, to our surprise, also influences inter-ring communication. The lid is dispensable for substrate binding and ATP hydrolysis, but is required for productive substrate folding. These regulatory functions of the lid may serve to allow the symmetrical chaperonins to function as 'two-stroke' motors and may also provide a timer for substrate encapsulation within the closed chamber.     

Type I chaperonins: not all are created equal

Type I chaperonins play an essential role in the folding of newly translated and stress-denatured proteins in eubacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. Since their discovery, the bacterial chaperonins have provided an excellent model system for investigating the mechanism by which chaperonins mediate protein folding. Due to the high conservation of the primary sequence among Type I chaperonins, it is generally accepted that organellar chaperonins function similar to the bacterial ones. However, recent studies indicate that the chloroplast and mitochondrial chaperonins possess unique structural and functional properties that distinguish them from their bacterial homologs. This review focuses on the unique properties of organellar chaperonins.     

Mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin 60 functions as a single toroidal ring.

Chaperonins are thought to participate in the process of protein folding in bacteria and in eukaryotic mitochondria and chloroplasts. While some chaperonins are relatively well characterized, the structures of the mammalian chaperonins are unknown. We have expressed a mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin 60 in Escherichia coli and purified the recombinant protein to homogeneity. Structural and biochemical analyses of this protein establish a single toroidal structure of seven subunits, in contrast to the homologous bacterial, fungal, and plant chaperonin 60s, which have double toroidal structures comprising two layers of seven identical subjects each. The recombinant mammalian chaperonin 60, together with the mammalian chaperonin 10 (but not with bacterial chaperonin 10), facilitates the formation of catalytically active ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state in the presence of K+ and MgATP. Analysis of the partial reactions involved in this in vitro reconstitution reveals that the single toroid of chaperonin 60 can form stable complexes with both unfolded or partially folded [35S]ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase and mitochondrial (but not bacterial) chaperonin 10 in the presence of MgATP. We conclude that the minimal functional unit of chaperonin 60 is a single hepatmeric toroid.     

Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese.

In vitro refolding of the monomeric mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese (thiosulfate sulfurtransferase; EC 2.8.1.1) is facilitated by molecular chaperonins. The four components: two proteins from Escherichia coli, chaperonin 60 (groEL) and chaperonin 10 (groES), MgATP, and K+, are necessary for the in vitro folding of rhodanese. These were previously shown to be necessary for the in vitro folding of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase at temperatures in excess of 25 degrees C (Viitanen, P. V., Lubben, T. H., Reed, J., Goloubinoff, P., O'Keefe, D. P., and Lorimer, G. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5665-5671). The labile folding intermediate, rhodanese-I, which rapidly aggregates at 37 degrees C in the absence of the chaperonins, can be stabilized by forming a binary complex with chaperonin 60. The discharge of the binary chaperonin 60-rhodanese-I complex, results in the formation of active rhodanese, and requires the presence of chaperonin 10. Optimal refolding is associated with a K(+)-dependent hydrolysis of ATP. At lower protein concentrations and 25 degrees C, where aggregation is reduced, a fraction of the rhodanese refolds to an active form in the absence of the chaperonins. This spontaneous refolding can be arrested by chaperonin 60. There is some refolding (approximately equal to 20%) when ATP is replaced by nonhydrolyzable analogs, but there is no refolding in the presence of ADP or AMP. ATP analogs may interfere with the interaction of rhodanese-I with the chaperonins. Nondenaturing detergents facilitate rhodanese refolding by interacting with exposed hydrophobic surfaces of folding intermediates and thereby prevent aggregation (Tandon, S., and Horowitz, P. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15615-15618). The chaperonin proteins appear to play a similar role in as much as they can replace the detergents. Consistent with this view, chaperonin 60, but not chaperonin 10, binds 2-3 molecules of the hydrophobic fluorescent reporter, 1,1'-bi(4-anilino)naphthalene-S,5'-disulfonic acid, indicating the presence of hydrophobic surfaces on chaperonin 60. The number of bound probe molecules is reduced to 1-2 molecules when chaperonin 10 and MgATP are added. The results support a model in which chaperonins facilitate folding, at least in part, by interacting with partly folded intermediates, thus preventing the interactions of hydrophobic surfaces that lead to aggregation.     

Crystal Structures of a Group II Chaperonin Reveal the Open and Closed States Associated with the Protein Folding Cycle

Chaperonins are large protein complexes consisting of two stacked multisubunit rings, which open and close in an ATP-dependent manner to create a protected environment for protein folding. Here, we describe the first crystal structure of a group II chaperonin in an open conformation. We have obtained structures of the archaeal chaperonin from Methanococcus maripaludis in both a peptide acceptor (open) state and a protein folding (closed) state. In contrast with group I chaperonins, in which the equatorial domains share a similar conformation between the open and closed states and the largest motions occurs at the intermediate and apical domains, the three domains of the archaeal chaperonin subunit reorient as a single rigid body. The large rotation observed from the open state to the closed state results in a 65% decrease of the folding chamber volume and creates a highly hydrophilic surface inside the cage. These results suggest a completely distinct closing mechanism in the group II chaperonins as compared with the group I chaperonins.     

Different mechanistic requirements for prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins: a lattice study

MOTIVATION: The folding of many proteins in vivo and in vitro is assisted by molecular chaperones. A well-characterized molecular chaperone system is the chaperonin GroEL/GroES from Escherichia coli which has a homolog found in the eukaryotic cytosol called CCT. All chaperonins have a ring structure with a cavity in which the substrate protein folds. An interesting difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins is in the nature of the ATP-mediated conformational changes that their ring structures undergo during their reaction cycle. Prokaryotic chaperonins are known to exhibit a highly cooperative concerted change of their cavity surface while in eukaryotic chaperonins the change is sequential. Approximately 70% of proteins in eukaryotic cells are multi-domain whereas in prokaryotes single-domain proteins are more common. Thus, it was suggested that the different modes of action of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins can be explained by the need of eukaryotic chaperonins to facilitate folding of multi-domain proteins. RESULTS: Using a 2D square lattice model, we generated two large populations of single-domain and double-domain substrate proteins. Chaperonins were modeled as static structures with a cavity wall with which the substrate protein interacts. We simulated both concerted and sequential changes of the cavity surfaces and demonstrated that folding of single-domain proteins benefits from concerted but not sequential changes whereas double-domain proteins benefit also from sequential changes. Thus, our results support the suggestion that the different modes of allosteric switching of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonin rings have functional implications as it enables eukaryotic chaperonins to better assist multi-domain protein folding.     

GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins-constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function-simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.     

Coexistence of group I and group II chaperonins in the archaeon Methanosarcina mazei

Two distantly related classes of cylindrical chaperonin complexes assist in the folding of newly synthesized and stress-denatured proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. Group I chaperonins are thought to be restricted to the cytosol of bacteria and to mitochondria and chloroplasts, whereas the group II chaperonins are found in the archaeal and eukaryotic cytosol. Here we show that members of the archaeal genus Methanosarcina co-express both the complete group I (GroEL/GroES) and group II (thermosome/prefoldin) chaperonin systems in their cytosol. These mesophilic archaea have acquired between 20 and 35% of their genes by lateral gene transfer from bacteria. In Methanosarcina mazei G?1, both chaperonins are similarly abundant and are moderately induced under heat stress. The M. mazei GroEL/GroES proteins have the structural features of their bacterial counterparts. The thermosome contains three paralogous subunits, alpha, beta, and gamma, which assemble preferentially at a molar ratio of 2:1:1. As shown in vitro, the assembly reaction is dependent on ATP/Mg2+ or ADP/Mg2+ and the regulatory role of the beta subunit. The co-existence of both chaperonin systems in the same cellular compartment suggests the Methanosarcina species as useful model systems in studying the differential substrate specificity of the group I and II chaperonins and in elucidating how newly synthesized proteins are sorted from the ribosome to the proper chaperonin for folding.     

Conformational rearrangements of tail-less complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1) ring complex (TRiC)-bound actin

The mechanism of chaperonins is still under intense investigation. Earlier studies by others and us on the bacterial chaperonin GroEL points to an active role of chaperonins in unfolding the target protein during initial binding. Here, a natural eukaryotic chaperonin system [tail-less complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1) ring complex (TRiC) and its target protein actin] was investigated to determine if the active participation of the chaperonin in the folding process is evolutionary-conserved. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements on four distinct doubly fluorescein-labeled variants of actin, we have obtained a fairly detailed map of the structural rearrangements that occur during the TRiC-actin interaction. The results clearly show that TRiC has an active role in rearranging the bound actin molecule. The target is stretched as a consequence of binding to TRiC and further rearranged in a second step as a consequence of ATP binding; i.e., the mechanism of chaperonins is conserved during evolution.     

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible,Possible

ABSTRACT

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins—constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function—simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.     

Cryo-EM structure of a group II chaperonin in the prehydrolysis ATP-bound state leading to lid closure

Chaperonins are large ATP-driven molecular machines that mediate cellular protein folding. Group II chaperonins use their "built-in lid" to close their central folding chamber. Here we report the structure of an archaeal group II chaperonin in its prehydrolysis ATP-bound state at subnanometer resolution using single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Structural comparison of Mm-cpn in ATP-free, ATP-bound, and ATP-hydrolysis states reveals that ATP binding alone causes the chaperonin to close slightly with a ～45° counterclockwise rotation of the apical domain. The subsequent ATP hydrolysis drives each subunit to rock toward the folding chamber and to close the lid completely. These motions are attributable to the local interactions of specific active site residues with the nucleotide, the tight couplings between the apical and intermediate domains within the subunit, and the aligned interactions between two subunits across the rings. This mechanism of structural changes in response to ATP is entirely different from those found in group I chaperonins.     

Gly-345 plays an essential role in Pyrococcus furiosus chaperonin function

Compared to the group I chaperonins, such as Escherichia coli GroEL, which facilitate protein folding, many aspects of the functional mechanism of archaeal group II chaperonins are unclear. Sequence homology between the chaperonin from Pyrococcus furiosus (PfCPN) and other group II chaperonins, together with the homo-oligomeric nature of PfCPN, suggest that PfCPN may serve as a model to clarify the role of the homologous position Gly-345 in the chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Here, we show that the purified chaperonin mutant in which the conserved residue Gly-345 is replaced by Asp (G345D) displays only about 25% ATP/ADP hydrolysis activities of the wild-type in the presence of Co²⁺ and has a reduced capacity to promote folding of denatured malate dehydrogenase in vitro. This may be a reflection that Gly-345 plays an essential role in conformational change and protein refolding by archaeal group II chaperonins.     

Archaeal group II chaperonin mediates protein folding in the cis-cavity without a detachable GroES-like co-chaperonin.

Group II chaperonins of archaea and eukaryotes are distinct from group I chaperonins of bacteria. Whereas group I chaperonins require the co-chaperonin Cpn-10 or GroES for protein folding, no co-chaperonin has been known for group II. The protein folding mechanism of group II chaperonins is not yet clear. To understand this mechanism, we examined protein refolding by the recombinant alpha or beta-subunit chaperonin homo-oligomer (alpha16mer and beta16mer) from a hyperthermoplilic archaeum, Thermococcus strain KS-1, using a model substrate, green fluorescent protein (GFP). The alpha16mer and beta16mer captured the non-native GFP and promoted its refolding without any co-chaperonin in an ATP dependent manner. A non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, AMP-PNP, induced the GFP refolding mediated by beta16mer but not by the alpha16mer. A mutant alpha-subunit chaperonin homo-oligomer (trap-alpha) could capture the non-native protein but lacked the ability to refold it. Although trap-alpha suppressed ATP-dependent refolding of GFP mediated by alpha16mer or beta16mer, it did not affect the AMP-PNP-dependent refolding. This indicated that the GFP refolding mediated by beta16mer with AMP-PNP was not accessible to the trap-alpha. Gel filtration chromatography and a protease protection experiment revealed that this refolded GFP, in the presence of AMP-PNP, was associated with beta16mer. After the completion of GFP refolding mediated by beta16mer with AMP-PNP, addition of ATP induced an additional refolding of GFP. Furthermore, the beta16mer preincubated with AMP-PNP showed the ability to capture the non-native GFP. These suggest that AMP-PNP induced one of two chaperonin rings (cis-ring) to close and induced protein refolding in this ring, and that the other ring (trans-ring) could capture the unfolded GFP which was refolded by adding ATP. The present data indicate that, in the group II chaperonin of Thermococcus strain KS-1, the protein folding proceeds in its cis-ring in an ATP-dependent fashion without any co-chaperonin.     

Chloroplast �� chaperonins from A. thaliana function with endogenous cpn10 homologs in vitro

The involvement of type I chaperonins in bacterial and organellar protein folding has been well-documented. In E. coli and mitochondria, these ubiquitous and highly conserved proteins form chaperonin oligomers of identical 60 kDa subunits (cpn60), while in chloroplasts, two distinct cpn60 α and β subunit types co-exist together. The primary sequence of α and β subunits is ~50% identical, similar to their respective homologies to the bacterial GroEL. Moreover, the A. thaliana genome contains two α and four β genes. The functional significance of this variability in plant chaperonin proteins has not yet been elucidated. In order to gain insight into the functional variety of the chloroplast chaperonin family members, we reconstituted β homo-oligomers from A. thaliana following their expression in bacteria and subjected them to a structure-function analysis. Our results show for the first time, that A. thaliana β homo-oligomers can function in vitro with authentic chloroplast co-chaperonins (ch-cpn10 and ch-cpn20). We also show that oligomers made up of different β subunit types have unique properties and different preferences for co-chaperonin partners. We propose that chloroplasts may contain active β homo-oligomers in addition to hetero-oligomers, possibly reflecting a variety of cellular roles.     

Chaperonins--keeping a lid on folding proteins

Two classes of chaperonins are known in all groups of organisms to participate in the folding of newly synthesized proteins. Whereas bacterial type I chaperonins use a reversibly binding cofactor to temporarily sequester folding substrate proteins within the cylindrical chaperonin cavity, type II chaperonins in archaea and the eukaryotic cytosol appear to have evolved a built-in lid for this purpose. Not entirely surprisingly, this has consequences for the folding modes of the two types of chaperonins.     

Transient conformational remodeling of folding proteins by GroES—individually and in concert with GroEL

The commonly accepted dogma of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system entails protein folding mediated by cycles of several ATP-dependent sequential steps where GroEL interacts with the folding client protein. In contrast, we herein report GroES-mediated dynamic remodeling (expansion and compression) of two different protein substrates during folding: the endogenous substrate MreB and carbonic anhydrase (HCAII), a well-characterized protein folding model. GroES was also found to influence GroEL binding induced unfolding and compression of the client protein underlining the synergistic activity of both chaperonins, even in the absence of ATP. This previously unidentified activity by GroES should have important implications for understanding the chaperonin mechanism and cellular stress response. Our findings necessitate a revision of the GroEL/ES mechanism.     

Rattling the cage: computational models of chaperonin-mediated protein folding

Chaperonins are known to maintain the stability of the proteome by facilitating the productive folding of numerous misfolded or aggregation-prone proteins and are thus essential for cell viability. Despite their established importance, the mechanism by which chaperonins facilitate protein folding remains unknown. Computer simulation techniques are now being employed to complement experimental ones in order to shed light on this mystery. Here we review previous computational models of chaperonin-mediated protein folding in the context of the two main hypotheses for chaperonin function: iterative annealing and landscape modulation. We then discuss new results pointing to the importance of solvent (a previously neglected factor) in chaperonin activity. We conclude with our views on the future role of simulation in studying chaperonin activity as well as protein folding in other biologically relevant confined contexts.     

The plastid chaperonin

The discovery and properties of the plastid chaperonin are described. This chaperonin is implicated in the folding and assembly of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase and in the folding of proteins imported into plastids from the cytosol. The plastid chaperonin appears to be unique in that it contains two distinct types of 60 kDa polypeptide, whereas only a single subunit type has been reported for the bacterial and mitochondrial chaperonins. The plastid chaperonin polypeptides are encoded by nuclear genes which are subject to complex regulation.     

Purification of chaperonins

The availability of protein samples of sufficient quality and in sufficient quantity is a driving force in biology and biotechnology. Protein samples that are free of critical contaminants are required for specific assays. Large amounts of highly homogeneous and reproducible material are needed for crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of protein structure. Protein-based therapeutic factors used in human medicine must not contain any contaminants that might interfere with treatment. The roles played by molecular chaperones in protein folding and in many cellular processes make these proteins very attractive candidates as biochemical reagents, and the class of chaperones called chaperonins is one of the most important candidates. Methods for successfully purifying chaperonins are needed to advance the field of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. This article outlines the strategies and methods used to obtain pure chaperonin samples from different biological sources. The objective is to help new researchers obtain better quality samples of chaperonins from many new organisms.