lon incompatibility associated with mutations causing SOS induction: null uvrD alleles induce an SOS response in Escherichia coli

The uvrD gene in Escherichia coli encodes a 720-amino-acid 3'-5' DNA helicase which, although nonessential for viability, is required for methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair and furthermore is believed to participate in recombination and DNA replication. We have shown in this study that null mutations in uvrD are incompatible with lon, the incompatibility being a consequence of the chronic induction of SOS in uvrD strains and the resultant accumulation of the cell septation inhibitor SulA (which is a normal target for degradation by Lon protease). uvrD-lon incompatibility was suppressed by sulA, lexA3(Ind(-)), or recA (Def) mutations. Other mutations, such as priA, dam, polA, and dnaQ (mutD) mutations, which lead to persistent SOS induction, were also lon incompatible. SOS induction was not observed in uvrC and mutH (or mutS) mutants defective, respectively, in excision repair and mismatch repair. Nor was uvrD-mediated SOS induction abolished by mutations in genes that affect mismatch repair (mutH), excision repair (uvrC), or recombination (recB and recF). These data suggest that SOS induction in uvrD mutants is not a consequence of defects in these three pathways. We propose that the UvrD helicase participates in DNA replication to unwind secondary structures on the lagging strand immediately behind the progressing replication fork, and that it is the absence of this function which contributes to SOS induction in uvrD strains.     

Escherichia coli uvrD mutants with thermosensitive DNA-dependent adenosine triphosphatase I (helicase II)

Three mutants producing thermosensitive DNA-dependent Adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) I were screened from a collection of temperature-sensitive mutants of Escherichia coli K12. ATPase I purified to near homogeneity from one of the mutants (JE11000) possesses both thermosensitive DNA-dependent ATPase and DNA helicase activities. We have shown that ATPase I is encoded by the uvrD gene as first suggested by Oeda et al. (1982): (i) the thermosensitive ATPase I mutation present in JE11040 lies in or very close to the uvrD gene, (ii) ATPase I activity is absent in uvrD210, uvrD156, and uvrD252 mutants. Thus the thermosensitive mutations correspond to new uvrD mutations. However, the mutation present in JE11040 confers neither UV sensitivity nor mutator phenotype at high temperature. Evidence is presented that the mutant ATPase I is stabilized in vivo at 42 degrees C.     

Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy

Many recombination, DNA repair and DNA replication mutants have high basal levels of SOS expression as determined by a sulAp-lacZ reporter gene system on a population of cells. Two opposing models to explain how the SOS expression is distributed in these cells are: (i) the 'Uniform Expression Model (UEM)' where expression is evenly distributed in all cells or (ii) the 'Two Population Model (TPM)' where some cells are highly induced while others are not at all. To distinguish between these two models, a method to quantify SOS expression in individual bacterial cells was developed by fusing an SOS promoter (sulAp) to the green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene and inserting it at attlambda on the Escherichia coli chromosome. It is shown that the fluorescence in sulAp-gfp cells is regulated by RecA and LexA. This system was then used to distinguish between the two models for several mutants. The patterns displayed by priA, dnaT, recG, uvrD, dam, ftsK, rnhA, polA and xerC mutants were explained best by the TPM while only lexA (def), lexA3 (ind-) and recA defective mutants were explained best by the UEM. These results are discussed in a context of how the processes of DNA replication and recombination may affect cells in a population differentially.     

uvrD mutations enhance tandem repeat deletion in the Escherichia coli chromosome via SOS induction of the RecF recombination pathway

It has previously been shown that recombination between tandem repeats is not significantly affected by a recA mutation in Escherichia coli . Here, we describe the activation of a RecA-dependent recombination pathway in a hyper-recombination mutant. In order to analyse how tandem repeat deletion may proceed, we searched for mutants that affect this process. Three hyper-recombination clones were characterized and shown to be mutated in the uvrD gene. Two of the mutations were identified as opal mutations at codons 130 and 438. A uvrD  ::Tn 5 mutation was used to investigate the mechanism of deletion formation in these mutants. The uvrD -mediated stimulation of deletion was abolished by a lexAind3 mutation or by inactivation of either the recA , recF , recQ or ruvA genes. We conclude that (i) this stimulation requires SOS induction and (ii) tandem repeat recombination in uvrD mutants occurs via the RecF pathway. In uvrD ⁺ cells, constitutive expression of SOS genes is not sufficient to stimulate deletion formation. This suggests that the RecF recombination pathway activated by SOS induction is antagonized by the UvrD protein. Paradoxically, we observed that the overproduction of UvrD from a plasmid also stimulates tandem repeat deletion. However, this stimulation is RecA independent, as is deletion in a wild-type strain. We propose that the presence of an excess of the UvrD helicase favours replication slippage. This work suggests that the UvrD helicase controls a balance between different routes of tandem repeat deletion.     

Long repair replication patches are produced by the short-patch pathway in a uvrD252 (recL152) mutant of Escherichia coli K-12

The uvrD252 mutation leads to increased UV sensitivity, diminished dimer excision and host cell reactivation capacity, and an increase in the average patch size after repair replication. A recA56 uvrD252 double mutant was far more resistant to UV than was a recA56 uvrB5 double mutant. Its host cell reactivation capacity was identical to that of uvrD252 single mutant and was far greater than that of the uvrB5 single mutant. The strain showed no Weigle reactivation. From these results, we concluded that the double mutant has no inducible DNA repair (including long-patch excision repair) but retains dimer excision capabilities comparable to the uvrD252 single mutant. It appears, therefore, that the long patches detected in the uvrD mutant were not identical to the recA-dependent patches seen in wild-type cells.     

PcrA is an essential DNA helicase of Bacillus subtilis fulfilling functions both in repair and rolling-circle replication

The only DNA helicase essential for Escherichia coli viability is DnaB, the chromosome replication fork helicase. In contrast, in Bacillus subtilis , in addition to the DnaB counterpart called DnaC, we have found a second essential DNA helicase, called PcrA. It is 40% identical to the Rep and UvrD DNA helicases of E. coli and 61% identical to the PcrA helicase of Staphylococcus aureus . This gene is located at 55° on the chromosome and belongs to a putative operon together with a ligase gene ( lig ) and two unknown genes named pcrB and yerH . As PcrA was essential for cell viability, conditional mutants were constructed. In such mutants, chromosomal DNA synthesis was slightly decreased upon PcrA depletion, and rolling-circle replication of the plasmid pT181 was inhibited. Analysis of the replication intermediates showed that leading-strand synthesis of pT181 was prevented upon PcrA depletion. To compare PcrA with Rep and UvrD directly, the protein was produced in rep and uvrD mutants of E. coli . PcrA suppressed the UV sensitivity defect of a uvrD mutant but not its mutator phenotype. Furthermore, it conferred a Rep⁻ phenotype on E. coli . Altogether, these results show that PcrA is an helicase used for plasmid rolling-circle replication and suggest that it is also involved in UV repair.     

Isolation of SOS constitutive mutants of Escherichia coli

The bacterial SOS regulon is strongly induced in response to DNA damage from exogenous agents such as UV radiation and nalidixic acid. However, certain mutants with defects in DNA replication, recombination, or repair exhibit a partially constitutive SOS response. These mutants presumably suffer frequent replication fork failure, or perhaps they have difficulty rescuing forks that failed due to endogenous sources of DNA damage. In an effort to understand more clearly the endogenous sources of DNA damage and the nature of replication fork failure and rescue, we undertook a systematic screen for Escherichia coli mutants that constitutively express the SOS regulon. We identified mutant strains with transposon insertions in 42 genes that caused increased expression from a dinD1::lacZ reporter construct. Most of these also displayed significant increases in basal levels of RecA protein, confirming an effect on the SOS system. As expected, this collection includes genes, such as lexA, dam, rep, xerCD, recG, and polA, which have previously been shown to cause an SOS constitutive phenotype when inactivated. The collection also includes 28 genes or open reading frames that were not previously identified as SOS constitutive, including dcd, ftsE, ftsX, purF, tdcE, and tynA. Further study of these SOS constitutive mutants should be useful in understanding the multiple causes of endogenous DNA damage. This study also provides a quantitative comparison of the extent of SOS expression caused by inactivation of many different genes in a common genetic background.     

Conserved motifs II to VI of DNA helicase II from Escherichia coli are all required for biological activity.

There are seven conserved motifs (IA, IB, and II to VI) in DNA helicase II of Escherichia coli that have high homology among a large family of proteins involved in DNA metabolism. To address the functional importance of motifs II to VI, we employed site-directed mutagenesis to replace the charged amino acid residues in each motif with alanines. Cells carrying these mutant alleles exhibited higher UV and methyl methanesulfonate sensitivity, increased rates of spontaneous mutagenesis, and elevated levels of homologous recombination, indicating defects in both the excision repair and mismatch repair pathways. In addition, we also changed the highly conserved tyrosine(600) in motif VI to phenylalanine (uvrD309, Y600F). This mutant displayed a moderate increase in UV sensitivity but a decrease in spontaneous mutation rate, suggesting that DNA helicase II may have different functions in the two DNA repair pathways. Furthermore, a mutation in domain IV (uvrD307, R284A) significantly reduced the viability of some E. coli K-12 strains at 30 degrees C but not at 37 degrees C. The implications of these observations are discussed.     

Specificity in suppression of SOS expression by recA4162 and uvrD303

Detection and repair of DNA damage is essential in all organisms and depends on the ability of proteins recognizing and processing specific DNA substrates. In E. coli, the RecA protein forms a filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage and induces the SOS response. Previous work has shown that one type of recA mutation (e.g., recA4162 (I298V)) and one type of uvrD mutation (e.g., uvrD303 (D403A, D404A)) can differentially decrease SOS expression depending on the type of inducing treatments (UV damage versus RecA mutants that constitutively express SOS). Here it is tested using other SOS inducing conditions if there is a general feature of ssDNA generated during these treatments that allows recA4162 and uvrD303 to decrease SOS expression. The SOS inducing conditions tested include growing cells containing temperature-sensitive DNA replication mutations (dnaE486, dnaG2903, dnaN159, dnaZ2016 (at 37 °C)), a del(polA)501 mutation and induction of Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs). uvrD303 could decrease SOS expression under all conditions, while recA4162 could decrease SOS expression under all conditions except in the polA strain or when DSBs occur. It is hypothesized that recA4162 suppresses SOS expression best when the ssDNA occurs at a gap and that uvrD303 is able to decrease SOS expression when the ssDNA is either at a gap or when it is generated at a DSB (but does so better at a gap).     

Construction and analysis of deletions in the structural gene (uvrD) for DNA helicase II of Escherichia coli.

DNA helicase II, the product of the uvrD gene, has been implicated in DNA repair, replication, and recombination. Because the phenotypes of individual uvrD alleles vary significantly, we constructed deletion-insertion mutations in the uvrD gene to determine the phenotype of cells lacking DNA helicase II. Deletion mutants completely lacking the protein, as well as one which contains a truncated protein retaining the ATP-binding site, remained viable. However, they were sensitive to UV light and exhibited elevated levels of homologous recombination and spontaneous mutagenesis. In addition, mutations mapping in or near rep which allow construction of rep uvrD double mutants at a high frequency were isolated.     

Identification of the gene for DNA helicase II of Escherichia coli

Using a modification of the solid-phase radioimmune assay of Broome and Gilbert [Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 75, 2746 (1978)] to screen the plaques of lambda recombinant phages for the presence of an elevated level of helicase-II-specific antigen, we have identified the gene for helicase II in a library of Escherichia coli DNA. The DNA selected was subcloned from lambda into plasmid vectors; restriction analysis located the DNA region encoding helicase II in a PvuII fragment identical in size (2900 base pairs) and restriction pattern to that which contains the uvrD gene. Plasmids carrying this DNA fragment complemented the increased sensitivity to ultraviolet irradiation and the mutator phenotype of uvrD mutants. Furthermore, uvrD502 mutant cells were found to liberate no helicase II activity upon extraction. Following transformation with the cloned DNA, active helicase II was recovered from the mutant cells. These results support the view that helicase II is encoded by uvrD.     

UvrD limits the number and intensities of RecA-green fluorescent protein structures in Escherichia coli K-12

RecA is important for recombination, DNA repair, and SOS induction. In Escherichia coli, RecBCD, RecFOR, and RecJQ prepare DNA substrates onto which RecA binds. UvrD is a 3'-to-5' helicase that participates in methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair. uvrD deletion mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation, hypermutable, and hyper-rec. In vitro, UvrD can dissociate RecA from single-stranded DNA. Other experiments suggest that UvrD removes RecA from DNA where it promotes unproductive reactions. To test if UvrD limits the number and/or the size of RecA-DNA structures in vivo, an uvrD mutation was combined with recA-gfp. This recA allele allows the number of RecA structures and the amount of RecA at these structures to be assayed in living cells. uvrD mutants show a threefold increase in the number of RecA-GFP foci, and these foci are, on average, nearly twofold higher in relative intensity. The increased number of RecA-green fluorescent protein foci in the uvrD mutant is dependent on recF, recO, recR, recJ, and recQ. The increase in average relative intensity is dependent on recO and recQ. These data support an in vivo role for UvrD in removing RecA from the DNA.     

Role of DNA replication in the induction and turn-off of the SOS response in Escherichia coli

Summary We have studied the role of DNA replication in turnon and turn-off of the SOS response in Escherichia coli using a recA::lac fusion to measure levels of recA expression.An active replication fork does not seem to be necessary for mitomycin C induced recA expression: a dnaA43 initiation defective mutant, which does not induce the SOS response at non-permissive temperature, remains mitomycin C inducible after the period of residual DNA synthesis. This induction seems to be dnaC dependent since in a dnaC325 mutant recA expression not only is not induced at 42° C but becomes mitomycin C non-inducible after the period of residual synthesis.Unscheduled halts in DNA replication, generally considered the primary inducing event, are not sufficient to induce the SOS response: no increase in recA expression was observed in dnaG(Ts) mutants cultivated at non-permissive temperature. The replication fork is nonetheless involved in induction, as seen by the increased spontaneous level of recA expression in these strains at permissive temperature.Turn-off of SOS functions can be extremely rapid: induction of recA expression by thymine starvation is reversed within 10 min after restoration of normal DNA replication. We conclude that the factors involved in induction-activated RecA (protease) and the activating molecule (effector)-do not persist in the presence of normal DNA replication.Abbreviations Ts thermosensitive - SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate - Ap ampicillin - UV ultraviolet - X-Gal 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl--D-galactoside     

Overlapping functions for recF and priA in cell viability and UV-inducible SOS expression are distinguished by dnaC809 in Escherichia coli K-12

The recF and priA genes have roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes also cause decreases in cell viability and alterations in UV-inducible sulAp–lacZ (SOS) expression. To find out if the two genes are in the same or different pathways for viability and SOS expression, the phenotypes of the double mutant strains were studied. The recF priA double mutant showed a lower viability and SOS expression level than either of the single mutants. In the case of cell viability, recF missense mutations decreased viability of a priA2 :: kan strain two to fivefold whereas recF null priA2 :: kan double mutants were not viable at all. dnaC809 , a mutation that suppresses the UV-sensitive (UV^S) and Rec⁻ phenotypes of priA2 :: kan , restored cell viability, but not UV-inducible SOS expression, to a priA recF strain. Since recF is epistatic with recO and recR ( recOR ) for UV resistance, recOR mutations were also tested with priA2 :: kan . No overlap was found between recOR and priA for viability and SOS expression. It is concluded that priA and recF have two different overlapping functions in viability and SOS expression that are distinguishable by the effects of dnaC809 . The role of recF in a priA2 :: kan strain in cell viability is a new function for recF and unlike recF  's other roles in DNA repair and recombination, is independent of recOR . A new role for priA in UV-inducible SOS expression in a recF mutant is also defined.     

RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12.

The recF, recO, and recR genes form the recFOR epistasis group for DNA repair. recF mutants are sensitive to UV irradiation and fail to properly induce the SOS response. Using plasmid derivatives that overexpress combinations of the recO+ and recR+ genes, we tested the hypothesis that high-level expression of recO+ and recR+ (recOR) in vivo will indirectly suppress the recF mutant phenotypes mentioned above. We found that overexpression of just recR+ from the plasmid will partially suppress both phenotypes. Expression of the chromosomal recO+ gene is essential for the recR+ suppression. Hence we call this RecOR suppression of recF mutant phenotypes. RecOR suppression of SOS induction is more efficient with recO+ expression from a plasmid than with recO+ expression from the chromosome. This is not true for RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity (the two are equal). Comparison of RecOR suppression with the suppression caused by recA801 and recA803 shows that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity is more effective than recA803 suppression and that RecOR suppression of UV sensitivity, like recA801 suppression, requires recJ+. We present a model that explains the data and proposes a function for the recFOR epistasis group in the induction of the SOS response and recombinational DNA repair.     

Non-mutability by ultraviolet light in uvrD recB derivatives of Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA is due to inhibition of RecA protein activation

The deficiency in UV mutagenesis in uvrD3 recB21 strains of E. coli is almost completely overcome by constitutive activation of RecA protein and expression of the SOS system (by recA730 or 43 degrees C treated recA441 lexA71). When SOS was expressed but RecA protein not self-activated (recA441 lexA71 at 30 degrees C), uvrD3 recB21 still reduced UV mutagenesis at low doses. The uvrD3 recB21 combination is therefore inhibiting activation of RecA protein. It is suggested that the DNA unwinding activity of the products of the uvrD and recB genes may be involved in generating single-stranded DNA needed to activate RecA protein both for the cleavage of LexA repressor and for a further role in UV mutagenesis.     

Characterization of DNA helicase II from a uvrD252 mutant of Escherichia coli.

The loss of DNA helicase II (UvrD) in Escherichia coli results in sensitivity to UV light and increased levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. While the effects of various uvrD alleles have been analyzed in vivo, the proteins produced by these alleles have not been examined in any detail. We have cloned one of these alleles, uvrD252, and determined the site of the mutation conferring the phenotype. In addition, the protein it encodes has been purified to homogeneity and characterized in vitro. The mutation responsible for the phenotype was identified as a glycine-to-aspartic-acid change in the putative ATP-binding domain. In comparison to wild-type DNA helicase II, the UvrD252 enzyme exhibited reduced levels of ATPase activity and a large increase in the Km for ATP. The ability of UvrD252 to unwind DNA containing single-stranded regions, as well as DNA containing only nicks, was reduced in comparison to that of the wild-type enzyme. Possible interpretations of these results in relation to the phenotypes of the uvrD252 mutant are discussed. This represents the first detailed analysis of the biochemical properties of a mutant DNA helicase II protein.     

Important role for Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrD1 in pathogenesis and persistence apart from its function in nucleotide excision repair

Mycobacterium tuberculosis survives and replicates in macrophages, where it is exposed to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that damage DNA. In this study, we investigated the roles of UvrA and UvrD1, thought to be parts of the nucleotide excision repair pathway of M. tuberculosis. Strains in which uvrD1 was inactivated either alone or in conjunction with uvrA were constructed. Inactivation of uvrD1 resulted in a small colony phenotype, although growth in liquid culture was not significantly affected. The sensitivity of the mutant strains to UV irradiation and to mitomycin C highlighted the importance of the targeted genes for nucleotide excision repair. The mutant strains all exhibited heightened susceptibility to representatives of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI). The uvrD1 and the uvrA uvrD1 mutants showed decreased intracellular multiplication following infection of macrophages. Most importantly, the uvrA uvrD1 mutant was markedly attenuated following infection of mice by either the aerosol or the intravenous route.     

Construction and characterization of two lexA mutants of Salmonella typhimurium with different UV sensitivities and UV mutabilities.

Salmonella typhimurium has a SOS regulon which resembles that of Escherichia coli. recA mutants of S. typhimurium have already been isolated, but no mutations in lexA have been described yet. In this work, two different lexA mutants of S. typhimurium LT2 have been constructed on a sulA background to prevent cell death and further characterized. The lexA552 and lexA11 alleles contain an insertion of the kanamycin resistance fragment into the carboxy- and amino-terminal regions of the lexA gene, respectively. SOS induction assays indicated that both lexA mutants exhibited a LexA(Def) phenotype, although SOS genes were apparently more derepressed in the lexA11 mutant than in the lexA552 mutant. Like lexA(Def) of E. coli, both lexA mutations only moderately increased the UV survival of S. typhimurium, and the lexA552 strain was as mutable as the lexA+ strain by UV in the presence of plasmids encoding MucAB or E. coli UmuDC (UmuDCEc). In contrast, a lexA11 strain carrying any of these plasmids was nonmutable by UV. This unexpected behavior was abolished when the lexA11 mutation was complemented in trans by the lexA gene of S. typhimurium. The results of UV mutagenesis correlated well with those of survival to UV irradiation, indicating that MucAB and UmuDCEc proteins participate in the error-prone repair of UV damage in lexA552 but not in lexA11. These intriguing differences between the mutagenic responses of lexA552 and lexA11 mutants to UV irradiation are discussed, taking into account the different degrees to which the SOS response is derepressed in these mutants.