HP1 proteins are essential for a dynamic nuclear response that rescues the function of perturbed heterochromatin in primary human cells

Cellular information is encoded genetically in the DNA nucleotide sequence and epigenetically by the "histone code," DNA methylation, and higher-order packaging of DNA into chromatin. Cells possess intricate mechanisms to sense and repair damage to DNA and the genetic code. However, nothing is known of the mechanisms, if any, that repair and/or compensate for damage to epigenetically encoded information, predicted to result from perturbation of DNA and histone modifications or other changes in chromatin structure. Here we show that primary human cells respond to a variety of small molecules that perturb DNA and histone modifications by recruiting HP1 proteins to sites of altered pericentromeric heterochromatin. This response is essential to maintain the HP1-binding kinetochore protein hMis12 at kinetochores and to suppress catastrophic mitotic defects. Recruitment of HP1 proteins to pericentromeres depends on histone H3.3 variant deposition, mediated by the HIRA histone chaperone. These data indicate that defects in pericentromeric epigenetic heterochromatin modifications initiate a dynamic HP1-dependent response that rescues pericentromeric heterochromatin function and is essential for viable progression through mitosis.     

A domain model for eukaryotic DNA organization: a molecular basis for cell differentiation and chromosome evolution

A model for eukaryotic chromatin organization is presented in which the basic structural and functional unit is the DNA domain. This simple model predicts that both chromosome replication and cell type-specific control of gene expression depend on a combination of stable and dynamic DNA-nuclear matrix interactions. The model suggests that in eukaryotes, DNA regulatory processes are controlled mainly by the intranuclear compartmentalization of the specific DNA sequences, and that control of gene expression involves multiple steps of specific DNA-nuclear matrix interactions. Predictions of the model are tested using available biochemical, molecular and cell biological data. In addition, the domain model is discussed as a simple molecular mechanism to explain cell differentiation in multi-cellular organisms and to explain the evolution of eukaryotic genomes consisting mainly of repetitive sequences and "junk" DNA.     

Epigenetic regulation of immune escape genes in cancer

According to the concept of immune surveillance, the appearance of a tumor indicates that it has earlier evaded host defenses and subsequently must have escaped immunity to evolve into a full-blown cancer. Tumor escape mechanisms have focused mainly on mutations of immune and apoptotic pathway genes. However, data obtained over the past few years suggest that epigenetic silencing in cancer may be as frequent a cause of gene inactivation as are mutations. Here, we discuss the evidence that tumor immune evasion is mediated by non-mutational epigenetic events involving chromatin and that epigenetics collaborates with mutations in determining tumor progression. Since epigenetic changes are potentially reversible, the relative contribution of mutations and epigenetics, to the gene defects in any given tumor, may be a factor in determining the efficacy of treatments. We review new developments in basic chromatin mechanisms and in this context describe the rationale for the current use of epigenetic agents in cancer therapy and for a novel epigenetically generated tumor vaccine model. We emphasize that epigenetic cancer treatments are currently a ‘blunt-sword’ and suggest future directions for designing chromatin-based programs of potential value in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.     

Developmental patterns of chromatin structure and DNA methylation responsible for epigenetic expression of a maize regulatory gene

Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms heritably alter patterns of gene expression without changes in DNA sequence. Epigenetic states are often correlated with developmentally imposed alterations in genomic DNA methylation and local chromatin structure. Pl-Blotched is a stable epigenetic allele of the maize anthocyanin regulatory gene, purple plant1(pl). Pl-Blotched plants display a variegated pattern of pigmentation that contrasts sharply with the uniformly dark purple pigmentation of plants carrying the dominant Pl-Rhoades allele. Previously, we showed that the lower level of pigmentation in Pl-Blotched is correlated with lower pl mRNA levels and increased DNA methylation at some sites. To explore how DNA methylation, chromatin structure, and developmental stage might contribute to the expression of Pl-Blotched, we used methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes and DNaseI sensitivity assays to compare the methylation status and chromatin structure of Pl-Blotched and Pl-Rhoades at different stages in development. Both alleles exhibit developmentally sensitive changes in methylation. In Pl-Blotched, methylation of two diagnostic HpaII/MspI sites increases progressively, coincident with the juvenile-to-adult transition in growth. In seedlings, the chromatin encompassing the coding region of the gene is less sensitive to DNaseI digestion in Pl-Blotched than in Pl-Rhoades. Developmental maturation from seedling to adult is accompanied by expansion of this closed chromatin domain to include the promoter and downstream flanking sequences. We provide evidence to show that chromatin structure, rather than DNA methylation, is the primary epigenetic determinant for the phenotypic differences between Pl-Blotched and Pl-Rhoades.     

Plasticity and Epigenetic Inheritance of Centromere-specific Histone H3 (CENP-A)-containing Nucleosome Positioning in the Fission Yeast

Nucleosomes containing the specific histone H3 variant CENP-A mark the centromere locus on each chromatin and initiate kinetochore assembly. For the common type of regional centromeres, little is known in molecular detail of centromeric chromatin organization, its propagation through cell division, and how distinct organization patterns may facilitate kinetochore assembly. Here, we show that in the fission yeast S. pombe, a relatively small number of CENP-A/Cnp1 nucleosomes are found within the centromeric core and that their positioning relative to underlying DNA varies among genetically homogenous cells. Consistent with the flexible positioning of Cnp1 nucleosomes, a large portion of the endogenous centromere is dispensable for its essential activity in mediating chromosome segregation. We present biochemical evidence that Cnp1 occupancy directly correlates with silencing of the underlying reporter genes. Furthermore, using a newly developed pedigree analysis assay, we demonstrated the epigenetic inheritance of Cnp1 positioning and quantified the rate of occasional repositioning of Cnp1 nucleosomes throughout cell generations. Together, our results reveal the plasticity and the epigenetically inheritable nature of centromeric chromatin organization.     

Genetic and epigenetic aspects of cloning and potential effects on offspring of cloned mammals

Although the biological mechanisms by which host cytoplasm and donor nuclei interact to produce a developmentally competent reconstructed embryo remain largely unknown, some advances have been made to our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic factors involved in the of reprogramming of the donor nucleus. Genetic alterations, which comprise changes to the genetic information in both the nuclear and cytoplasm compartments, are passed on to subsequent generations at fertilization and are a potential source of variation among cloned animals and their offspring. Apart from the major chromosomal anomalies found in developmentally arrested embryos and fetuses, less detrimental rearrangements and/or mutations are likely to go unnoticed in most donor cell karyotypes, suggesting that such problems could lead to inheritable anomalies among clones and their offspring. Mitochondrial DNA is also relevant to cloning because most animals inherit most or all of their mitochondria from the host oocyte. Epigenetic alterations to the DNA or to the histone packaging proteins are independent of gene sequences. Aberrant epigenetic events may lead to variable gene expression or mitosis and consequent effects on development and phenotype. Although much of the epigenetic marking is reset during embryogenesis and development, the impact of epimutations on progeny remains unexplored.     

Epigenetic variability in plants: Heritability,adaptability, evolutionary significance

DNA methylation is the most stable epigenetic modification with a well studied maintenance mechanism in the mitotically dividing cell generations. The plant DNA is methylated at sites of three types, CG, CHG and CHH. The methylation mechanisms of these sites are different and involve functional activity of various DNA methyltransferases and their accessory factors, that largely define the genome locus specificity of methylation. The genome methylation pattern, DNA methylome, in plants is inheritable not only in the dividing cell generations but also to a considerable extent in generations of the whole plants. A great number of spontaneous epimutations, both natural and experimental ones, are known, that have discernible phenotypic manifestations and are stably inheritable in the plant generations as Mendelian traits. A fundamental distinction of such epimutations from classical mutations is their reversibility. The higher plants epigenome is much more flexible compared with their genome. The single-nucleotide epimutation frequency is hundredfolds higher than the mutation frequency. This variability is probably a main source of the plant phenotypic plasticity, that enables them to adapt to changing environment on the time scales too short for adaptive mutations to occur. A dramatic increase in the plant population epigenetic variability on a practically unchanged genetic context is observed when the essential environmental factors are rapidly changing. Being flexible enough for such adaptive changes, on the other hand, epigenome is stable enough for these adaptive variations to be inheritable between the plant generations. Obviously, the epigenetic variations, that enable plants to adapt to the fast changing environmental factors, serve as material for natural selection and other evolutionary processes on the respective time scales. A still another aspect of evolutionary significance is a capability of epigenetic mechanisms to induce transient bursts of genetic variability by transposon mobilization.     

Nuclear architecture in the light of gene expression and cell differentiation studies

It is evident that primary DNA sequences, that define genomes, are responsible for genome functions. However, the functional properties of chromatin are additionally regulated by heritable modifications known as epigenetic factors and, therefore, genomes should be also considered with respect to their 'epigenomes'. Nucleosome remodelling, DNA methylation and histone modifications are the most prominent epigenetic changes that play fundamental roles in the chromatin-mediated control of gene expression. Another important nuclear feature with functional relevance is the organization of mammalian chromatin into distinct chromosome territories which are surrounded by the interchromatin compartment that is necessary for transport of regulatory molecules to the targeted DNA. The inner structure of the chromosome territories, as well as the arrangement of the chromosomes within the interphase nuclei, has been found to be non-randomly organized. Therefore, a specific nuclear arrangement can be observed in many cellular processes, such as differentiation and tumour cell transformation.     

Stable Patterns of CENH3 Occupancy Through Maize Lineages Containing Genetically Similar Centromeres

While the approximate chromosomal position of centromeres has been identified in many species, little is known about the dynamics and diversity of centromere positions within species. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that DNA sequence has little or no impact in specifying centromeres in maize and in most multicellular organisms. Given that epigenetically defined boundaries are expected to be dynamic, we hypothesized that centromere positions would change rapidly over time, which would result in a diversity of centromere positions in isolated populations. To test this hypothesis, we used CENP-A/cenH3 (CENH3 in maize) chromatin immunoprecipitation to define centromeres in breeding pedigrees that included the B73 inbred as a common parent. While we found a diversity of CENH3 profiles for centromeres with divergent sequences that were not inherited from B73, the CENH3 profiles from centromeres that were inherited from B73 were indistinguishable from each other. We propose that specific genetic elements in centromeric regions favor or inhibit CENH3 accumulation, leading to reproducible patterns of CENH3 occupancy. These data also indicate that dramatic shifts in centromere position normally originate from accumulated or large-scale genetic changes rather than from epigenetic positional drift.     

Poly-ADP-Ribose (PAR) as an epigenetic flag

Epigenetics is the study of hereditable chromatin modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and nucleosome-remodelling, which occur without alterations to the DNA sequence. The establishment of different epigenetic states in eukaryotes depends on regulatory mechanisms that induce structural changes in chromatin in response to environmental and cellular cues. Two classes of enzymes modulate chromatin accessibility: chromatin-covalent modifiers and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes. The first class of enzymes catalyzes covalent modifications of DNA as well as the amino- and carboxy-terminal tails of histones, while the second uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to reposition nucleosomes along the chromatin fibers or to incorporate histone variants. Thus, epigenetic modifications are reversible nuclear reactions. In the last decade, many studies have strongly indicated that alterations in epigenetic modifications may contribute to the onset and progression of a variety of human diseases such as cancer. Therefore, the enzymes responsible for these chromatin changes are becoming attractive therapeutic targets.     

The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms

Background  

The phenotype of an organism is an outcome of both its genotype, encoding the primary sequence of proteins, and the developmental orchestration of gene expression. The substrate of gene expression in eukaryotes is the chromatin, whose fundamental units are nucleosomes composed of DNA wrapped around each two of the core histone types H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Key regulatory steps involved in the determination of chromatin conformations are posttranslational modifications (PTM) at histone tails as well as the assembly of histone variants into nucleosomal arrays. Although the mechanistic background is fragmentary understood, it appears that the chromatin signature of metazoan cell types is inheritable over generations. Even less understood is the conservation of epigenetic mechanisms among eukaryotes and their origins.