An Alternative Non-Macrolide, Non-Imidazole Treatment Regimen for Curing Helicobacter pylori and Duodenal Ulcers: Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate Plus Amoxicillin

Background. Because patients who fail to be cured of H. pylori infection following macrolide or imidazole therapy are difficult to treat, there is a clear need for a reasonably effective and simple second-line treatment regimen. The purpose of these two studies was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus amoxicillin for the cure of H. pylori infection and for healing duodenal ulcers and preventing ulcer relapse.
Materials and Methods. Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies were conducted in patients with an H. pylori -associated duodenal ulcer. Patients were treated with either RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks plus amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks, placebo bid for 4 weeks and amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, or placebo bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks. Patients with healed ulcers after 4 weeks of treatment were eligible for entry into a 24-week observation phase for the assessment of H. pylori status (culture, histology, and CLOtest^TM) and ulcer relapse.
Results. A total of 229 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection at baseline were evaluated. Of these, 132 whose ulcers had healed entered the 24-week posttreatment observation phase. The combination of RBC plus amoxicillin resulted in higher H. pylori cure rates (55%) and higher duodenal ulcer healing (74%) than did either treatment alone. All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusions. The combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin cures H. pylori infection in more than half of the patients treated. This treatment regimen shows promise as the basis for future non-macrolide, non-imidazole triple therapy regimens for curing H. pylori infection. Such regimens may be appropriate second-line treatment for patients who are resistant to or who are unable to tolerate macrolide- or imidazole-containing therapies.     

Interaction of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Nonsteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs in Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers

Background: Gastric (GU) and duodenal ulcers (DU) are in most instances either induced by Helicobacter pylori infection or by nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Whether eradication of H. pylori is beneficial in NSAID users for preventing NSAID induced GU and DU has been the focus of different studies. Materials and Methods: Mechanisms shared by both H. pylori and NSAIDs for the induction of GU and DU were reviewed and randomized controlled trials on H. pylori eradication for prevention and healing of GU and DU in patients requiring NSAID therapy were identified by a PubMed search. Results: Key factors in the induction of GU and DU for both H. pylori and NSAIDs are a decrease in pH, imbalance between apoptosis and proliferation, reduction in mucosal blood flow, and recruitment of polymorphonucleates in distinct compartments. For primary ulcer prevention, H. pylori eradication before starting an NSAID therapy reduces the risk of NSAID induced GU and virtually abolishes the risk of DU. H. pylori eradication alone is not sufficient for secondary prevention of NSAID induced GU and DU. H. pylori infection appears to further increase the protective effects of proton‐pump inhibitors (PPI) to reduce the risk of ulcer relapse. H. pylori eradication does not influence the healing of both GU and DU if NSAID intake is discontinued. Conclusions: Duodenal ulcer is more closely related to H. pylori infection than GU in NSAID users. H. pylori eradication is recommended for primary prevention of GU and DU in patients requiring NSAID therapy. PPI therapy is mandatory for secondary prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers, and appears to further reduce the risk of ulcer relapse in the presence of H. pylori.     

Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated from Adult Patients with Gastric or Duodenal Ulcer in Italy

Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria are widespread in arthropods and are also present in filarial nematodes. Almost all filarial species so far examined have been found to harbor these endosymbionts. The sequences of only three genes have been published for nematode Wolbachia (i.e., the genes coding for the proteins FtsZ and catalase and for 16S rRNA). Here we present the sequences of the genes coding for the Wolbachia surface protein (WSP) from the endosymbionts of eight species of filaria. Complete gene sequences were obtained from the endosymbionts of two different species, Dirofilaria immitis and Brugia malayi. These sequences allowed us to design general primers for amplification of the wsp gene from the Wolbachia of all filarial species examined. For these species, partial WSP sequences (about 600 base pairs) were obtained with these primers. Phylogenetic analysis groups these nematode wsp sequences into a coherent cluster. Within the nematode cluster, wsp-based Wolbachia phylogeny matches a previous phylogeny obtained with ftsZ gene sequences, with a good consistency of the phylogeny of hosts (nematodes) and symbionts (Wolbachia). In addition, different individuals of the same host species (Dirofilaria immitis and Wuchereria bancrofti) show identical wsp gene sequences. Received: 10 January 2000 / Accepted: 22 February 2000     

Effect of Smoking and Histological Gastritis Severity on the Rate of H. pylori Eradication with Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin

Background. The combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is a common regimen against Helicobacter pylori. Several recent studies have shown that smoking, high intragastric acidity, and the degree of histological gastritis are associated with H. pylori eradication failure.
Materials and Methods. One hundred and thirty-seven H. pylori –positive patients were treated with a 1-week regimen composed of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; amoxicillin, 500 mg; and clarithromycin, 200 mg thrice daily. Success of the treatment was evaluated by histology and the ¹³C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Data about age, gender, alcohol intake, smoking habits, and previous proton pump inhibitor intake were collected in patient interviews. We evaluated fasting gastric pH and the degree of histological gastritis before eradication of H. pylori.
Results. The overall eradication of H. pylori at 4 weeks was successful in 98 of 137 patients (72%). On the multivariate analysis, a low grade of inflammation in the antrum ( p ≤ .01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34–16.75), low grade of activity in the fundus ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.31–9.65), and smoking ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.27–6.82) were the significant independent factors predicting treatment failure.
Conclusions. These findings indicate that H. pylori eradication therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is less effective in patients who smoke and more effective in patients with high scores of antral inflammation and fundal activity at baseline biopsy.     

Lafutidine versus Lansoprazole in Combination with Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin for One versus Two Weeks for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Korea

Background and Aims: Lafutidine is a novel H₂‐receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity that includes enhancement of gastric mucosal blood flow. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of 7‐ or 14‐day lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy versus a lansoprazole‐based regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: Four hundred and sixty‐three patients with H. pylori‐infected peptic ulcer disease were randomized to one of four regimens: (1) lafutidine (20 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LFT group) or (2) for 14 days (the 14LFT group); (3) lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LPZ group); or (4) for 14 days (the 14LPZ group). The eradication rates, drug compliance, and adverse effects among the four regimens were compared. Results: The eradication rates by the intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 7LFT and 7LPZ groups were 76.5% and 81.6%, and 76.9% and 82.0% (p = .94 and .95), respectively. The eradication rates by intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 14LFT and 14LPZ groups were 78.2% and 82.2%, and 80.4% and 85.9% (p = .70 and .49), respectively. The treatment duration for 7 days or 14 days did not affect the eradication rates. In addition, the adverse effect rates and discontinuation rates were similar among the four groups. Furthermore, the ulcer cure rate and symptom response rate were similar in the lafutidine and lansoprazole groups. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy was a safe and effective as lansoprazole‐based triple therapy for the eradication rate of H. pylori, and could be considered as an additional treatment option.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Using One-week Triple Therapies Combining Omeprazole with Two Antimicrobials: The MACH I Study

Background. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori provides potential cure in the majority of patients with peptic ulcer disease, and eradication rates of more than 90% have been reported, using omeprazole in combination with two antimicrobials. The choice of antimicrobials, dose regimen and duration of treatment have varied between studies, however, and an optimal treatment still has to be established.
Materials and Methods. We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving more than 100 patients in each of six treatment groups in 43 hospital gastrointestinal units in Canada, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Patients (n=787) with proved duodenal ulcer disease were randomized to treatment twice daily for 1 week with omeprazole, 20 mg (O), plus either placebo (P) or combinations of two of the following anti-microbials: amoxicillin, 1 gm (A), clarithromycin, 250 or 500 mg (C250, C500), or metronidazole, 400 mg (M). Eradication of H. pylori was evaluated by ¹³C-UBT, performed before and 4 weeks after treatment cessation.
Results. The eradication rates for the all-patients-treated analysis were 96%. OAC500; 95%, OMC250; 90%, OMC500; 84%, OAC250; 79%, OAM; and 1%, OP. OAC500 and OMC250 achieved eradication rates with lower 95% confidence interval limits exceeding 90%. All regimens were well-tolerated, 96% of patients complied with their dose regimen, and 2.3% of the patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events.
Conclusions. Omeprazole triple therapies given twice daily for 1 week produce high eradication rates, are well-tolerated, and are associated with high patient compliance. The two most effective therapies were those combining omeprazole, 20 mg, with either amoxicillin, 1 gm, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg, or metronidazole, 400 mg, plus clarithromycin, 250 mg, all given twice daily.     

Combined Activity of Azithromycin and Lansoprazole Against Helicobacter pylori

Background. Due to its unique pharmacokinetic properties, azithromycin may be an attractive combination partner for H. pylori eradication regimens. However, up to 15% of clinical isolates are primarily resistant to azithromycin as well as to other macrolide antibiotics. Combination therapy with lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor known to have intrinsic antibacterial activity against H. pylori , may be useful to counteract such resistance. We therefore evaluated the combined effects of azithromycin and lansoprazole in vitro.
Materials and Methods. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of azithromycin and lansoprazole alone and in combination were determined for 106 clinical H. pylori isolates by means of an agar dilution technique. Killing kinetics of seven isolates were also studied in fluid medium.
Results. MIC values for 50 and 90% of the isolates (MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀) were 0.19 and 0.5 mg/l for azithromycin, and 44.5 and 104 mg/l for lansoprazole. Nine strains (8.5%) had an MIC of azithromycin ≥ 16 mg/l and were regarded as resistant. An additive interaction between the two drugs was found in 72 (68%), and indifferent effects in 24 strains (23%). Three of 9 azithromycin-resistant strains regained sensitivity in the presence of lansoprazole. In fluid culture, synergism between the two drugs occurred in 6 out of 7 strains tested.
Conclusion. In the majority of strains, lansoprazole and azithromycin interacted in an additive or synergistic manner depending on the test method employed. Addition of lansoprazole restored in vitro sensitivity to azithromycin in 3 out of 9 azithromycin-resistant strains. Such effects may enhance the elimination of H. pylori during clinical eradication therapy.