The Role of Gcr1p in the Transcriptional Activation of Glycolytic Genes in Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

To study the interdependence of Gcr1p and Rap1p, we prepared a series of synthetic regulatory sequences that contained various numbers and combinations of CT-boxes (Gcr1p-binding sites) and RPG-boxes (Rap1p-binding sites). The ability of the synthetic oligonucleotides to function as regulatory sequences was tested using an ENO1-lacZ reporter gene. As observed previously, synthetic oligonucleotides containing both CT- and RPG-boxes conferred strong UAS activity. Likewise, a lone CT-box did not show any UAS activity. By contrast, oligonucleotides containing tandem CT-boxes but no RPG-box conferred strong promoter activity. This UAS activity was not dependent on position or orientation of the oligonucleotides in the 5'' noncoding region. However, it was dependent on both GCR1 and GCR2. These results suggest that the ability of Gcr1p to bind Gcr1p-binding sites in vivo is not absolutely dependent on Rap1p. Eleven independent mutants of GCR1 were isolated that conferred weak UAS activity to a single CT-box. Five mutants had single mutations in Gcr1p''s DNA-binding domain and displayed slightly higher affinity for the CT-box. These results support the hypothesis that Gcr1p and Gcr2p play the central role in glycolytic gene expression and that the function of Rap1p is to facilitate the binding of Gcr1p to its target.     

Highly conserved toxicity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rap1p

Budding yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) Rap1p has been expressed in fission yeast ( Schizosaccharo-myces pombe ) under the control of the regulatable fructose bisphosphatase ( fbp ) promoter. When the fbp promoter was derepressed, cells containing the complete RAP1 gene failed to show any significant growth, suggesting that Rap1p is toxic. A derivative of Rap1p that has a temperature-sensitive mutation in the DNA-binding domain was not toxic in cells grown at 37°C, a temperature at which DNA binding by rap1p ^ts is severely inhibited. Removal of a short region downstream of the DNA-binding domain, including a region previously shown to be essential for Rap1p toxicity in budding yeast, also abolished the toxic effect. The toxic effect of Rap1p has therefore been conserved between two distantly related yeasts. In budding yeast, overexpression of Rap1p also caused changes to the lengths of the telomeric repeats. No effects on telomeres were detected in fission yeast.     

Rap1‐mediated nucleosome displacement can regulate gene expression in senescent cells without impacting the pace of senescence

Cell senescence is accompanied, and in part mediated, by changes in chromatin, including histone losses, but underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We reported previously that during yeast cell senescence driven by telomere shortening, the telomeric protein Rap1 plays a major role in reprogramming gene expression by relocalizing hundreds of new target genes (called NRTS, for n ew R ap1 t argets at s enescence) to the promoters. This leads to two types of histone loss: Rap1 lowers histone level globally by repressing histone gene expression, and it also causes local nucleosome displacement at the promoters of upregulated NRTS. Here, we present evidence of direct binding between Rap1 and histone H3/H4 heterotetramers, and map amino acids involved in the interaction within the Rap1 SANT domain to amino acids 392–394 (SHY). Introduction of a point mutation within the native RAP1 locus that converts these residues to alanines (RAP1^SHY), and thus disrupts Rap1‐H3/H4 interaction, does not interfere with Rap1 relocalization to NRTS at senescence, but prevents full nucleosome displacement and gene upregulation, indicating direct Rap1‐H3/H4 contacts are involved in nucleosome displacement. Consistent with this, the histone H3/H4 chaperone Asf1 is similarly unnecessary for Rap1 localization to NRTS but is required for full Rap1‐mediated nucleosome displacement and gene activation. Remarkably, RAP1^SHY does not affect the pace of senescence‐related cell cycle arrest, indicating that some changes in gene expression at senescence are not coupled to this arrest.