The bethesda terminology for reporting thyroid cytopathology: from theory to practice in europe

Objectives: A 2007 conference held at the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md., USA, proposed a new terminology for classifying the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) - The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC). The need to standardize thyroid FNA terminology was emphasized during the 35th European Congress of Cytology in 2009. An interobserver review study to assess the new terminology for analyzing the results of thyroid FNA was organized by the scientific committee of the European Federation of Cytology Societies. Study Design: Four experts in thyroid FNA examined and classified 116 FNAs according to the 6 levels of TBSRTC which are: nondiagnostic (ND); benign; atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS); follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN), with those of Hürthle cell type reported as follicular neoplasm, Hürthle cell type/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm, Hürthle cell type (FNHCT/SFNHCT); suspicious (SUS), and malignant. Results: The total consensus was 62.1%; the cytopathologists disagreed on 44 cases, including 8 cases of AUS/FLUS and 18 of FN/SFN; 59% of the cases had no consensus. They agreed on 73 and 80% of the cases classified as benign and malignant, respectively, and on 58.3% of the SUS cases. The percentage of no consensus for each expert was between 32 and 39%. Conclusions: Disagreement regarding the use of TBSRTC terminology for classifying the results of thyroid FNA mainly occurred in the most-often criticized categories of AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN.     

Telomerase activity in thyroid fine needle aspirates

OBJECTIVE: To study the utility of telomerase activity (TA) detection in thyroid fine needle aspirates (FNAs). STUDY DESIGN: One hundred two thyroid nodules were studied: 70 in FNA samples and 32 in frozen tumors. From among FNA samples, there were 57 nodules of the goiter, 1 adenoma, 7 papillary carcinomas, 1 medullary carcinoma and 1 lymphoma. Three cases of thyroiditis were excluded. The 32 frozen tissue tumors consisted of 5 follicular adenomas, 4 follicular carcinomas and 23 papillary carcinomas. TA was analyzed by Telomerase PCR ELISA (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A.). RESULTS: TA was negative in the 57 nonneoplastic nodules and 6 follicular adenomas and positive in 3 of 4 follicular carcinomas and 10 of 30 papillary carcinomas. TA sensitivity was 41.4% and specificity 100%. Sensitivity for malignancy was higher (85.7%) in FNAs than in TA. CONCLUSION: TA seems highly specific for neoplasms of the thyroid. Further studies are needed to confirm whether TA detection could contribute to identifying neoplasms when FNAs are inconclusive for malignancy and in cases of scanty material.     

Value of Repeating A Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveTo assess the value of repeating a biopsy when the initial thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is nondiagnostic.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2003, 4,311 thyroid FNAs were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, of which 220 (5%) were nondiagnostic. Among 189 patients whose medical records were available for retrospective review, 106 underwent a repeated FNA (FNA #2), and 14 had a second repeated FNA (FNA #3). Thyroid ultrasonography was used in the evaluation in 113 FNAs.ResultsThe first and second repeated FNAs were diagnostic in 58% (62 of 106 patients) and 50% (7 of 14 patients), respectively. The rate of malignant disease in patients with no repeated FNAs versus 1 or more repeated FNAs was 4.8% (4 of 83) versus 11.3% (12 of 106), respectively. Ultrasound-guided FNA yielded a diagnosis among 33 of 113 biopsies (29.2%), and FNA without ultrasound guidance provided a diagnosis in 30 of 159 biopsies (18.9%). Thus, the use of thyroid ultrasonography significantly improved the likelihood of establishing a diagnosis (P = 0.017). We found that repeating the FNA up to 2 times provides a diagnosis in up to 60% of cases.ConclusionThe overall prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with nondiagnostic FNA is not trivial—8.5% in our study group of 189 patients. An aggressive approach toward nondiagnostic FNA biopsies is recommended, with performance of at least 2 repeated FNA biopsies, preferably with the help of ultrasound guidance. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:735-742)     

Thyroseq®V2.0 Molecular Testing: A Cost-Effective Approach for the Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Approximately 15 to 30% of thyroid nodules have indeterminate cytology. Many of these nodules are treated surgically, but only 5 to 30% are malignant. Molecular testing can further narrow the risk of malignancy of these nodules. Our objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of ThyroSeq®V2.0 compared to diagnostic thyroidectomy for the evaluation of indeterminate nodules.Methods: Cytology and histopathology slides of Bethesda category III and IV (suspicious for follicular neoplasia [SFN]) nodules obtained between January 1, 2014 and November 30, 2016 were re-reviewed by 2 endocrine cytopathologists. Costs for a diagnostic approach using ThyroSeq® were calculated and compared to those of diagnostic thyroidectomy.Results: We included 8 Bethesda category III nodules that underwent ThyroSeq® and 8 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 4 were positive for mutations and underwent thyroid surgery. The average cost per nodule evaluated was $14,669 using ThyroSeq®, compared to $23,338 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $58,674 using ThyroSeq® compared to $62,233 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. We included 13 nodules Bethesda category IV that underwent ThyroSeq® and 11 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 6 were positive for mutation and underwent thyroid surgery. The average costs per nodule evaluated were $14,641 using ThyroSeq® and $24,345 using diagnostic thyroidectomy. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $31,721 when using ThyroSeq® compared to $53,560 for diagnostic thyroidectomy.Conclusion: The use of ThyroSeq® in our institution is cost effective compared to diagnostic thyroid surgery for the evaluation of Bethesda categories III and IV (SFN) nodules.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; GEC = gene expression classifier; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasia     

Repeatedly nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspirations do not modify malignancy risk

Objective: Thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic (ND) fine-needle aspirations (FNA) typically undergo repeat sampling. While repeat FNA is often diagnostic, little is known regarding the significance of repeatedly ND aspirates. Limited data suggest there is very low, if any, risk of malignancy for repeatedly ND FNAs. Study Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of ND thyroid FNAs over a nearly 6-year period at our institution to further address this question. Results: There were 834 ND thyroid FNAs, representing 694 distinct thyroid nodules. Repeat FNA was performed after an initial ND aspirate in 52% of cases (363/694); 19% (70/363) had at least one additional ND diagnosis on repeat FNA. Surgical follow-up was available for 57 cases. Malignancy was identified histologically in 21% (9/42) of nodules after a single ND FNA and in 20% (3/15) of nodules with 2 or more repeatedly ND aspirates. Accounting for all benign cytologic follow-up, the overall risk of malignancy was 4% [12/303; 3.5% (9/255) following a single ND FNA and 6.3% (3/48) after repeated ND FNAs]. Conclusion: We observed no modification of malignancy risk when repeated FNAs were ND. Clinical management for an ND aspirate should remain repeat aspiration along with clinical and sonographic correlation.     

Timing of repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration in the management of thyroid nodules

Objective: The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) recommends repeat aspirations be done at least 3 months following the initial aspiration to prevent false-positive misinterpretations due to reactive/reparative changes. Because limited data exists, we reviewed our own data to ascertain the recommendation. Study Design: We retrospectively reviewed thyroid FNAs accessioned in the Cytology Laboratory at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Mass., USA, from January 2006 to December 2008. We identified patients with repeat aspirates of a single lesion and those with thyroidectomy specimens. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses along with time between FNAs were recorded. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the distribution among nondiagnostic, suboptimal, and adequate categories with respect to the timing of repeat FNA (p = 0.25). Forty-six percent of the lesions that were nondiagnostic/suboptimal initially yielded the same results on repeat. Twenty-eight percent of initially adequate specimens were nondiagnostic/suboptimal on repeat (p = 0.04). Nine percent of those with an initial atypical diagnosis had the same diagnosis on repeat, while 2.6% of those who did not have an initial atypical diagnosis had an atypical diagnosis on repeat (p = 0.29). False positives between early (16%) and late (12%) repeats were not statistically significant (p = 0.74). Conclusion: The diagnostic yield and accuracy of repeat FNA is independent of the time interval between procedures but may be related to the original FNA diagnosis.     

Cytologic Features of Focal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Arising within Follicular Adenoma: A Masked Cytomorphologic Analysis of 17 Cases

Background/Objective: Focal papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) arising within a follicular adenoma (PTCFA) represents a clinically significant, but rare, histopathologic subset of papillary carcinomas whose cytologic features have not been well described. This uncommon presentation of PTC may contribute to a subset of thyroid aspirates interpreted as 'atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance' (AUS/FLUS). Study Design: Seventeen fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cases diagnosed as 'PTCFA' on corresponding surgical excision were identified from the archival records of 2 large academic medical centers. A control group of 40 FNAB comprised of 20 follicular adenomas (FA) and 20 PTC was identified (based on the corresponding surgical pathology diagnosis) for comparison. All 57 FNAB were reviewed in a masked fashion and scored for a series of 31 cytomorphologic features. The intraclass correlation between diagnostic categories and overall agreement between cytopathologists was statistically evaluated. Results: Aspirates of PTCFA were originally diagnosed as 'negative' (n = 3), 'AUS/FLUS' (n = 7), 'suspicious for a follicular neoplasm' (n = 3), 'suspicious for malignancy' (n = 3), and 'malignant' (n = 1). On masked review, the most common cytomorphologic features of PTCFA were a nonmacrofollicular cytoarchitectural pattern (71%), medium-large cell size (74%), and micronucleoli (79%). Intranuclear pseudoinclusions and a papillary architecture were absent in 85 and 88% of the cases, respectively. Relative to the 2 control groups, the PTCFA cases demonstrated overlapping features between FA and PTC for the majority of the 31 examined cytomorphologic features. Conclusion: PTCFA represent a rare subset of PTC that is difficult to recognize as PTC by FNAB. Most cases exhibit overlapping features between a benign thyroid nodule and conventional PTC, and they are often interpreted as 'AUS/FLUS'.     

BRAF Mutation Testing of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens Enhances the Predictability of Malignancy in Thyroid Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance

Background/Objective: The Bethesda 2007 Thyroid Cytology Classification defines atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) as a heterogeneous category of cases that are neither convincingly benign nor sufficiently atypical for a diagnosis of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for malignancy. At our institution, we refer to these cases as 'indeterminate' and they are further subclassified into two categories. BRAF mutation occurs in 40-60% of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we examined cases in the AUS/FLUS category in correlation with BRAF mutation analysis and surgical pathology outcome. Study Design: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology specimens interpreted as 'indeterminate' were selected from our files, and available remnants of thin-layer processed specimens were used for BRAF mutation analysis. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed for the final outcomes in these patients. Results: Of the 84 indeterminate cases with BRAF mutation analysis, only 49 had follow-up with surgical intervention. Sixteen cases had BRAF mutation. All of the BRAF-positive cases had a final diagnosis of PTC. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of BRAF mutation in detecting PTC in FNA specimens with indeterminate diagnosis was 59.3 and 100%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 65.6%, respectively. The limited data supports the use of BRAF mutation analysis to predict the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid FNAs.     

Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology: an analysis of discrepant cases

OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and analyse the discrepant cases of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid. METHODS: Cases of thyroid FNAC with a corresponding histological diagnosis were reviewed regarding the original cytological diagnoses by two observers. The final cytological diagnoses (FCD) included both concordant and consensus diagnoses. The inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and efficacy of thyroid FNAC were calculated based on the FCD. RESULTS: A total of 97 FNAC cases with corresponding histopathological specimens were analysed. Although inter- and intraobserver disagreement in the cytological diagnoses occurred in about one-quarter of the cases analysed (24.7% and 23.7%, respectively), a substantial level of diagnostic interobserver (kappa = 0.71) and intraobserver (kappa = 0.66) reproducibility was observed. The efficacy of the method was 94.4%. Disagreement in the diagnosis was detected in 24 cases (24.7%), most of them (41.7%) for follicular lesions. Discordant cytological diagnoses between the two observers were represented by six (16.2%) of the 37 cases with an FCD of colloid nodule, five (41.7%) of the 12 cases of cellular follicular lesion, all three cases of follicular neoplasm, in two (6.3%) of the 32 cases of PTC, one (16.7%) of six cases of follicular neoplasm with a predominance of Hürthle cells and in one case of poorly differentiated neoplasia. Similarly, major disagreement in intraobserver cytological diagnoses was observed for the diagnosis of follicular lesions: 18 (78.3%) of a total of 23 discordant cases. CONCLUSION: As discrepancies in the cytopathological diagnosis can have repercussions in the management of patients, all cases with a cytological diagnosis of follicular lesions/neoplams should be reviewed in multidisciplinary meetings thus minimizing interobserver variability.     

Cytopathology of non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear features: A comparative study with similar patterned papillary thyroid carcinoma variants

Objective

Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear features (NIFTP) is a recently described, indolent thyroid tumor, with well‐defined histopathological diagnostic criteria. Cytology features are not well documented. We reviewed cytology of histologically proven cases of NIFTP and some of its common differentials to look for salient diagnostic features.

Methods

Cases reported on histopathology as follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC), or NIFTP between July 2015 and April 2017 having available cytology smears were retrieved and reclassified as NIFTP, FVPTC, and classical papillary thyroid carcinoma with predominant follicular pattern (PTC‐FP). Cytological features were assessed, classified as per The Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology and compared.

Results

There were 23 NIFTP cases, 18 FVPTC and 8 PTC‐FP. A microfollicle‐predominant pattern was seen in all. Nuclear score was 2 in most NIFTP cases (61%). Pseudoinclusions were absent. NIFTP showed features of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) (III) in 61%, follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) (IV) in 35% and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) (V) in 4%. Most of the FVPTCs were also called FN/SFN (IV) (56%) or AUS/FLUS (III) (22%). Nuclear features did not statistically differ from NIFTP. PTC‐FP showed high‐grade cytology in 75%, and higher nuclear score (3 in 75%) in contrast to NIFTP (P = .003).

Conclusion

NIFTP and FVPTC show a similar distribution among the Bethesda categories hence precluding conclusive distinction on cytology. PTC‐FP, in contrast, was found to have a statistically significant higher nuclear score and more commonly showed malignant cytology.

     

Thyroid Bethesda reporting category, ‘suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma’, pitfalls and clues to optimize the use of this category

A. Mahajan, X. Lin and R. Nayar Thyroid Bethesda reporting category, ‘suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma’, pitfalls and clues to optimize the use of this category Objective: The Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology classifies the indeterminate categories based on their differing risks of malignancy, as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FLUS) and suspicious for malignancy. The vast majority of cases of the last category are suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of the present study was to identify the pitfalls and clues to improve the usage of the suspicious category as well as improve its outcome of malignancy. Methods: We reviewed the cytological features on air dried Diff‐Quik® and alcohol‐fixed Papanicolaou smears from 54 thyroid fine needle aspirates (FNAs) with surgical follow‐up that were originally diagnosed as suspicious. Procedure data/specimen adequacy was correlated and follow‐up histology reports were reviewed after our cytological review was completed. Incidental PTC that was not the target of the FNA was excluded from the calculations for correlation. Results: In our cytological review, we retained a diagnosis of suspicious in 18 of the 54 cases and the remaining 36 were re‐categorized as follows: 6 malignant, 10 neoplasm (which is used in our centre instead of FLUS) and 20 AUS. The reasons for overcall of suspicious cases included pseudopapillae, syncytial sheets, nuclear grooves and pinpoint nucleoli in chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and Hürthle cell neoplasms, and intranuclear inclusions in parathyroid adenoma, hyalinizing trabecular adenoma and mesenchymal repair. The primary reasons for undercall of PTC as suspicious included cystic aspirates with minor features of PTC such as histiocytoid cells, bubblegum colloid, syncytial sheets and cellular swirls. Cases with cytoplasm similar to Hürthle cells were also noted to cause difficulty in accurate classification. Conclusions: Recognition of these pitfalls and clues can help improve diagnosis, patient treatment and consequently reduce the number of unnecessary thyroidectomies.     

Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology

N. Dincer, S. Balci, A. Yazgan, G. Guney, R. Ersoy, B. Cakir and G. Guler
Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology Objective: To report our experience of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) rate and outcome. Methods: Among 7658 patients with 19 569 nodules, 524 (2.7%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNA). After exclusion of patients with simultaneous nodules that were suspicious for follicular neoplasm or malignancy or that were malignant, 368 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. The outcome of 146 patients who had undergone surgery or repeated fine needle aspirate at the time of preparation of this study was evaluated. The original FNAs were matched to repeated FNAs and thyroidectomy or diagnostic lobectomy specimens. Results: Seventy‐two (19.6%) of the 368 patients had directly undergone surgery, either a lobectomy or a thyroidectomy: of these, 27 (37.5%) had neoplastic nodules (21 were malignant). Seventy‐four (20.1%) of the 368 patients had repeat FNA. On second FNA, 47 of 74 (63.5%) were benign, three were suspicious for follicular neoplasm, one was malignant and 23 (31.1%) were non‐diagnostic. Four patients had a third FNA: two were AUS/FLUS, one was malignant and one non‐diagnostic. One patient had a fourth FNA, which was diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Sixteen (21.6%) of 74 patients with repeat FNA had surgery: three of these had neoplastic nodules (two were malignant). Overall, 88 of the 368 (23.9%) patients had a thyroidectomy of which 30 (34.1%) were neoplastic and 23 (26.1%) malignant. The neoplastic rate for patients who were once diagnosed with AUS/FLUS was 8.2% and the malignancy rate 6.3%. The malignancy rate for patients on follow‐up at the time we prepared the study was 15.7% (23/146); 222 remained on follow‐up without surgery or repeat FNA or were managed elsewhere. Conclusions: Although in this category repeat FNA is expected rather than excision, we suggest evaluation of all AUS/FLUS patients in multidisciplinary meetings to decide management and recommend follow‐up of all patients with this diagnosis.     

Prediction of Nondiagnostic Results in Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: utility of On-Site Gross Visual Assessment of Specimens for Liquid-Based Cytology

Objective: To explore a comprehensive approach for on-site gross visual assessments of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens of thyroid nodules and determine morphologic criteria that help predict nondiagnostic rates.Methods: Two-hundred nodules from 165 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at our hospital were included in this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis. Specimens were visually assessed on-site for three morphologic categories (specimen color, specimen volume, and particle count) using a 5-point grading.Results: Twenty-two nodules (11%) showed nondiagnostic results. Regarding specimen color, nondiagnostic rates tended to be higher in grades 1 (75%) and 5 (100%) than in grades 2 (18%), 3 (8%), or 4 (17%), with a significant difference between grade 1 and grade 3 (P = .003). For specimen volume, nondiagnostic results were significantly more common in grade 1 (33%) and 5 (33%) than in grades 3 (5%) or 4 (1%) (P<.005). There was a significant negative correlation between the grading of the particle count and the nondiagnostic rate (Spearman ρ = -1.000; P<.001). The sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of nondiagnostic results were 77% and 76%, respectively, at the optimal cutoff value of 2 (grade 2 or lower).Conclusion: Particle count was an important morphologic criterion that helped predict nondiagnostic rates in LBC specimens of thyroid nodules, and the specimen color and volume were also useful adjuncts. In routine practice, on-site gross visual assessment followed by resampling (if necessary) may potentially help reduce the rates of nondiagnostic results, repeat FNAs, and the number of unnecessary needle passes.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; LBC = liquid-based cytology; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; US = ultrasonography     

Prognosis of High-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients with Pre-Ablation Stimulated TG <1 NG/ML

Objective: The prevalence of undetectable pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin (s-Tg) and its clinical implications in high-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients remain poorly described. We investigated the rate of tumor recurrence in PTC patients initially classified as high risk but with pre-ablation s-Tg <1 ng/mL and negative anti-Tg antibody (TgAb).Methods: In order to have a follow-up period of at least 5 years for each patient, PTC patients consecutively seen at our department from May 2008 to June 2013 with the following characteristics were selected: (i) classified as American Thyroid Association high risk on the basis of tumor histopathologic features; (ii) submitted to adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy after total thyroidectomy; (iii) a postoperative pre-ablation s-Tg <1 ng/mL and negative TgAb.Results: Among 767 high-risk PTC patients submitted to adjuvant ¹³¹I therapy, 69 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven patients (97.1%) were diagnosed as classical PTC, and the remaining 2 patients (2.9%) were diagnosed as follicular variant PTC. When evaluated 9 to 12 months after ¹³¹I therapy, 67 patients (97.1%) were classified as excellent response. Two (2.9%) patients had an s-Tg >1 ng/mL (<3 ng/mL) in the absence of apparent disease, as detected by imaging methods (indeterminate response). During a median follow-up duration of 5.6 years, recurrence was observed in only 2 (2.9%) patients. The 67 (97.1%) patients without tumor recurrence were not submitted to any additional therapy, and all had a suppressed Tg <1 ng/mL in the last assessment.Conclusion: High-risk PTC patients with pre-ablation s-Tg <1 ng/mL and negative TgAb had a favorable prognosis.Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; L-T4 = levothyroxine; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; SPECT/CT = single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography; s-Tg = stimulated thyroglobulin; T4 = thyroxine; TgAb = anti-thyroglobulin antibody; US = ultrasound     

Utility of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules and Correlation with Ultrasound Risk Assessment: Single Institutional Experience

Objective: We assessed our experience with Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) combined with sono-graphic risk assessment, using both the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: We identified 98 patients with 101 nodules who had a second fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and sent to Veracyte for cytopathology and subsequent Afirma GEC testing. A second FNA biopsy was performed if the initial cytopathology was either Bethesda III or IV (n = 94) or nondiagnostic (n = 7). We correlated cytopathology, histopathology, and Afirma GEC results with sonographic risk assessment using both the ATA system and TI-RADS.Results: The mean age of the cohort was 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 84% women and 60% white. Repeat FNA was benign in 51 of 101 nodules, and of the remaining 50 nodules, 18 (36%) were GEC-benign and 32 (64%) GEC-suspicious. Eighteen of the 32 GEC-suspicious nodules underwent surgery with the following results: 7 benign (39%), 1 follicular thyroid carcinoma (6%), 6 follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (33%), and 4 noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (22%). The malignancy rate among the surgical cohort was 39% (without noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]) and 61% (with NIFTP) and about 50% and 20% of this group scored in the high suspicion category by ATA and TR5 by TI-RADS, respectively.Conclusion: Afirma GEC was useful in avoiding surgery in one-third of indeterminate nodules and performed similarly to ATA and TI-RADS. However, the use of echogenicity in scoring may underestimate the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate nodules.Abbreviations:ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = Atypia of Undetermined Significance; FLUS = Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; ND = nondiagnostic; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR = TI-RADS     

Atypical follicular cells with equivocal features of papillary thyroid carcinoma is not a low-risk cytologic diagnosis

Objective: To determine whether or not significant differences in the risk of malignancy exist between subgroups of atypical follicular cells in The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in patients who underwent surgical resection. Study Design: Between 2004 and 2009, consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspirates at our institutions with a cytologic diagnosis of 'atypical follicular cells' were retrieved and subclassified using the diagnosis and diagnostic comment as: (1) atypical follicular cells with equivocal features of papillary carcinoma [cannot exclude papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)] and (2) atypical follicular cells, other patterns. The risks of malignancy for excised nodules were calculated and comparisons were made between these subgroups. Categorical analysis was performed using a 2-tailed Fisher's exact test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 7,072 thyroid fine-needle aspiration cases were retrieved, with 1,542 (21.8%) having a histologic follow-up. There were 222 (3.1%) cases of 'atypical follicular cells', with 127 (57.2%) having a histologic correlation and 33 having confirmed malignancies. Atypical follicular cells, cannot exclude PTC, have a significantly higher risk of malignancy than atypical follicular cells, other patterns (45.8 vs. 13.9%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Atypical follicular cells with equivocal features of papillary carcinoma is not a low-risk cytologic diagnosis.     

The Role of Core-Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules with Initially Nondiagnostic Fine-Needle Aspiration Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence of nondiagnostic results, diagnostic performance, and complications of core-needle biopsy (CNB) compared with repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules with previous nondiagnostic FNA findings.Methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were thoroughly searched for studies evaluating CNB or repeat FNA for thyroid nodules with initially nondiagnostic FNA results. Pooled proportions of nondiagnostic results of CNB and repeat FNA were calculated. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CNB and repeat FNA for a diagnosis of malignancy using a bivariate random-effects model. Complication rates were also evaluated.Results: A review of 52 articles identified 4 eligible articles, involving 1,028 patients with 1,028 thyroid nodules, which were included in the meta-analysis. CNB demonstrated significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic results (6.4%) than repeat FNA (36.5%) (P<.0001). In the 3 studies that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of CNB in diagnosing malignancy, CNB demonstrated significantly higher summary estimates of sensitivity (89.8%) than repeat FNA (60.6%) (P = .022), but summary specificity did not differ between CNB (99.2%) and repeat FNA (99.0%) (P = .576). None of the patients who underwent CNB or repeat FNA experienced any major complications.Conclusion: CNB demonstrates lower rates of nondiagnostic results and higher diagnostic accuracy than repeat FNA. CNB, rather than repeat FNA, can be utilized to diagnose thyroid nodules previously nondiagnostic on FNA.Abbreviations:CI = confidence intervalCNB = core-needle biopsyFNA = fine-needle aspirationSROC = summary receiver operating characteristicUS = ultrasound     

Interobserver variability in the fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of follicular lesions of the thyroid gland

OBJECTIVE: To study the degree of interobserver variability in the interpretation of fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of the thyroid, specifically in the categorization of follicular lesions (FLs), and to examine the accuracy of FNA diagnosis of FLs with surgical follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty cases were chosen with surgical follow-up and a cytologic diagnosis of either FL (21) or follicular neoplasms (29). Representative slides were selected for each case and circulated to 4 pathologists for review. Interobserver variability was assessed using pairwise K statistics. Accuracy of the cytologic diagnoses in predicting a nonneoplastic or neoplastic outcome was determined by measuring sensitivity and specificity. Likelihood ratios and receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated for each reviewer. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement between the 4 pathologists was fair to substantial (K scores, 0.199-0.617). The accuracy of the 4 pathologists' cytologic diagnoses in predicting the surgical outcome was 77-90% for follicular neoplasms and 53-74% for nonneoplastic diagnoses. CONCLUSION: FLs present diagnostic difficulties as to cytologic categorization. A wide range of interobserver agreement was found in this study of 4 pathologists from the same institution. Some pathologists make greater use of intermediate categories, such as FL, favor nonneoplastic, or FL, favor neoplastic, whereas others show more definitive categorization into benign and neoplastic groups.     

Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Cytology: The Impact of The Reclassification of Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features (NIFTP)

Objective: Noninvasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC) was recently reclassified as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). We aimed to compare the risk of malignancy (ROM) of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), before and after the reclassification, in a large cohort of patients.Methods: We analyzed 5,625 consecutive FNAC samples performed in 2012–2014 and selected category III (atypia of undetermined significance &lsqb;AUS]/follicular lesion of undetermined significance &lsqb;FLUS]), IV (follicular neoplasm &lsqb;FN]/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm &lsqb;SFN]), V (suspicious for malignancy &lsqb;SFM]), and VI (malignant) of the BSRTC. We reviewed the histology of operated patients and compared ROM before and after the introduction of the NIFTP category.Results: A total of 772 patients were identified and 45% underwent surgery (n = 348). There were 180 cases of AUS/FLUS (10 NIFTP), 114 cases of FN/SFN (2 NIFTP), 29 cases of SFM (3 NIFTP), and 25 cases of BSRTC VI (no NIFTP). Exclusion of NIFTP from malignant lesions resulted in a relative and absolute decrease in the ROM in AUS/FLUS (15.2% and 5.5%, respectively), FN/SFN (7.6% and 1.8%, respectively) and SFM (14.2% and 10.3%, respectively) categories. Among the NIFTP patients, 93% underwent total thyroidectomy and 20% received radioiodine.Conclusion: Reclassification of noninvasive EFVPTC as NIFTP resulted in a decrease in overall ROM, and the BSRTC categories most affected were III and V.Abbreviations: AUS = atypia of undetermined significance; BSRTC = Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology; EFVPTC = encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; FLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNAC = fine-needle aspiration cytology; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma; ROM = risk of malignancy; SFM = suspicious for malignancy; SFN = suspicious for a follicular neoplasm